<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2017.98064</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-77475</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessment of Surface Water Quality of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya Gold Mining Area (East-Cameroon)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Felaniaina</surname><given-names>Rakotondrabe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jules</surname><given-names>Remy Ndam Ngoupayou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zakari</surname><given-names>Mfonka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eddy</surname><given-names>Harilala Rasolomanana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexis</surname><given-names>Jacob Nyangono Abolo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Banakeng</surname><given-names>Lucian Asone</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Andrew</surname><given-names>Ako Ako</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Miora</surname><given-names>Harivony Rakotondrabe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institute of Geological and Mining Research (IRGM), Hydrological Research Centre, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mines, Advanced School of Engineering of Antananarivo, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rak.fleur@gmail.com(FR)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>960</fpage><lpage>984</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>16,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>4,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>7,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  
    To assess the water quality in the locality of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya affected by an intensive artisanal and semi mechanized mining activities, 71 samples were collected from sixteen points during the 2015-2016 hydrological year. These points include: three in Lom river which is the main stream of the study area, five in Mari river which is one of the left bank tributaries of the Lom, in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya and eight in the left and the right bank of Mari. Different physicochemical parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), alkalinity, turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), cyanide (CN
   <sup>-</sup>), major elements and heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Cd, Fe, Cu, As, Mn and Cr) were analyzed. Water Quality Indices (WQI), Heavy metal Pollution Index (HPI), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and percent sodium (Na%) were also computed to evaluate the suitability of water for drinking and irrigation. The results showed that the surface water from B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya was acidic to basic (5.40 &lt; pH &lt; 8.84), weakly mineralized (11.60 &lt; EC &lt; 122.10 μS/cm) with a high concentration of TSS (2 &lt; TSS &lt; 8996.00 mg/L) and turbidity (1.22 to 4758.00 NTU). The WQI scores show excellently to unsuitable quality in almost all the sampling sites. The water quality is found to be most deteriorated in Lom river and in the downstream of Mari river where an extensive mining activity is carried out, with the high WQI value of 5137.40. Based on heavy metal pollution index, the mean value was 1195.36 and thus under the critical pollution index. We thus notice a serious physical degradation by organic and mineral suspended particles as well as chemical degradation by heavy metals. This results from mining activities in the Lom river and its main tributaries such as the Mari river in the upstream part of the Sanaga basin. According to the percentage of sodium and SAR, these waters can be used for irrigation purposes in almost all types of soils. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>B&#233;tare-Oya in East Cameroon</kwd><kwd> Hydrochemistry</kwd><kwd> Gold Mining</kwd><kwd> Water Quality Index</kwd><kwd> Heavy Metal Pollution Index</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In Cameroon, surface water resources (streams, lakes, swamps) play a very vital role in the economy of this country since it is used for drinking, domestic activities, agriculture (irrigation), industries, hydroelectricity, mining activities, fishing, tourism and leisure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref2">2</xref>] . Concerning water supply, it is mostly done by tapping at water points (taps, wells and boreholes) in rural areas especially in the northern part of Cameroon essentially made up of sedimentary formations. This is the contrary in the southern part particularly in urban areas, mostly made up of basement formations, where water tapping is mainly done by capturing of surface water, followed by their physical and chemical treatment as well as water from boreholes. However, these surface waters regularly experience a quantitative and qualitative deterioration due to human activities (urbanization, agriculture, industries and mining activities), to which can be added the phenomenon of climate change/variability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref5">5</xref>] . Among these human activities, a more attention will be laid on the impact of mining on water resources, particularly on surface water.</p><p>As in most developing countries, Cameroon has experienced a great progress in mining, mainly in the Adamaoua and East regions (Batouri, Colomines, Yokadouma, Meiganga and B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref7">7</xref>] . In the latter, gold-bearing sites are exploited in an artisanal to semi-mechanized manner, thus predisposing the surface water to serious environmental pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Most studies in the East region have mainly concerned rocks, soils and gold mineralization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref10">10</xref>] . No studies exist yet on water resource quality in relation to mining activities in this area. The aim of the present study is to assess surface water quality in the B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold mining area (East Cameroon) through hydrochemical analyses using water quality indices (WQI) and heavy metal pollution index. Water quality index (WQI) is an effective technique for assessing drinking water quality suitability in any area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref12">12</xref>] . Heavy metal pollution index (HPI) is used to evaluate the hazardous metal pollution in drinking water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref14">14</xref>] . The Betar&#233;-Oya site retained for this study is found to the north of the Lom-Pangar dam at the upstream part of the Sanaga basin (the largest and most important basin in Cameroon with a surface area of 133,000 km<sup>2</sup>). The solid, liquid, physical and chemical waste resulting from artisanal and semi-mechanized exploitation of gold deposits in the area could lead to the degradation of the quality of water in the Sanaga, and could have a negative impact on the rich aquatic fauna of this ecosystem, on the project of supplying potable water for the inhabitants of Yaounde tapped at Batschenga. This therefore induces us to carry out a study in this regard.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold district is located in the Sanaga basin between latitudes 5˚30 '07'' and 5˚46'01'' North, and longitudes 14˚04'04'' and 14˚28'06'' East (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The study area varies from 665 m to 1050 m altitude. The climate is a typical equatorial transition type, characterized by two seasons consisting of a long rainy season from March to November, a short dry season from December to February. The hydrologic regime of the river Lom in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya is controlled by rainfall, the lowest monthly flow rate is observed in February (56 m<sup>3</sup>/s), while the maximum flow rate is observed in October (328 m<sup>3</sup>/s). In the 2015-2016 hydrologic year, the mean annual flow rate was 150 m<sup>3</sup>/s, corresponding to a specific discharge of 13.50 l/s/km<sup>−2</sup>. This corresponds to runoff which flows at 397.55 mm for a flow coefficient of 28%; with an average annual rainfall of 1440 mm. The average inter-annual temperature is 24.58˚C. The hottest month is March with an average temperature of 26.00˚C and the coldest month is in July (23.50˚C).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Geological Setting</title><p>B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya belongs to the Panafrican belt of Cameroon, limited to the North by the Adamawa shear zone and to the South, by the Sanaga shear zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location of the study area in the Sanaga basin</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x2.png"/></fig><p>The geological formations are dominated by meta-sedimentary rocks, metavolcanics and intrusive granites known as the “Lom series” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref17">17</xref>] . They consist of schists, micaschists, orthogneiss of Wakaso and Ndokayo, quartzites, cross-cut by Pan-African granitoids and conglomerates of Mari, post-tectonic granite of Ngibi and Kongolo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref19">19</xref>] . These lithological units have a NE-SW steeply dipping foliation reflecting a dextral and senestral shear direction that is related to the central shear zone of Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref19">19</xref>] . The Lom series is also well known for its gold mineralization as well as other minerals associated with granitic intrusions such as Pb, Bi and Mo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref21">21</xref>] . Two types of gold mineralization are known in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref16">16</xref>] : (1) mineralization in quartz veins associated with pyrite and (2) alluvial and eluvial deposits, which have been intensively exploited in the area. The latter are located in the flats of the River Lom and its tributaries such as Mari, Nakoyo, Mbal. The geological formations of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya are overlain mainly by thick ferrallitic soils with brown or red color. Hydromorphic soils occur in marshy areas as well as alluvial flats and the dark color on the upper part of the profile is indicative of the abundance of organic matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sampling and Analytical Procedure</title><p>The river Lom and some of its tributaries (Mari, Mbal, Nakoyo) drain the vast majority of the B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya mining sites. In the present study, sampling was carried out in the Lom, Mari and some of its tributaries which drains a representative area of all the mining sites in the locality. Sixteen sampling points were identified in Lom River and the Mari River and its tributaries. The points include:</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Geological map of Cameroon (modified after [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref21">21</xref>] ; (b) Regional geological map of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya (modified after [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref15">15</xref>] ))</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x3.png"/></fig><p>three on the Lom River, five points on the main Mari River, three and five points respectively on the left and right bank of Mari (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). These points were identified using Global Positioning System (GPS) materialized on a SRTM satellite image with 30 m of resolution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). All these points were selected based on criteria such as accessibility and their proximity or not in the vicinity of the mining sites. All of the sixteen sample points were used for physicochemical analysis (EC, turbidity, TSS, Na<sup>+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, F<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and four of them were selected for the control of heavy metals and cyanide. This includes two points of the Mari River and it right bank (MMR<sub>3</sub>, MMR<sub>5</sub>) and two points from the Lom River (LOM<sub>2</sub>, LOM<sub>3</sub>). These points are either located close to the mining sites or around the area where washing and panning is carried out. A total of 71 samples were collected from April 2015 to February 2016, taking into account the different seasons of the hydrological year of the study area.</p><p>Samples were collected manually once time at &lt;1 m depth at the centre of the river preferentially where the flow velocity was high enough to allow a good homogenization of the solid particles and dissolved materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref5">5</xref>] . The samples were collected in 1.5 L polyethylene bottles washed with ultrapure acid, previously rinsed with distilled and MilliQ deionized waters, and finally rinsed three</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> DEM map of B&#233;tay&#233;-Oya showing sampling points in the Lom River, Mari and its tributaries as well as the mining sites of the locality</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geographical coordinates of the sixteen sample points</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Site description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample points</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Altitude (m)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Lom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lom upstream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >687</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lom middle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0874</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6332</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >682</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lom downstream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0379</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >683</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Mari main river</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mari main river upstream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMR<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >877</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mari main river downstream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMR<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6460</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >818</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mari main river downstream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMR<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6575</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >793</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mari main river downstream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMR<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >702</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mari main river downstream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMR<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >688</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Mari tributary on the right bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bissiri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MRB<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6537</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >904</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bissiri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MRB<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >953</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B&#233;oudou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MRB<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >899</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Mari tributary on the left bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mombal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLB<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >918</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B&#233;ri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLB<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5474</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >897</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pawara</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLB<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0897</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5766</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >779</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B&#233;d&#233;r&#233;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLB<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Littoro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLB<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >688</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>times with sampling water according to standard procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Some in-situ parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity (EC) were measured on unfiltered water using calibrated WTW 315i instruments. The samples for trace elements analysis were filtered on-site through filters on acetate cellulose 0.45 μm into 250 ml polyethylene bottle and immediately acidified to pH &lt; 2 with ultrapure nitric acid. All samples were stored in an ice-chest at temperature less than 4˚C until they were transported to the laboratories in Yaound&#233; (Cameroon) and analyzed within ten days. Chemical analyses of water samples were performed in the Laboratory of Geochemical and Water Analysis (LAGE) at Nkolbisson (Cameroon). The major cations (Na<sup>+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>) was performedby Dionex ICS-90 ion chromatography and major anions (Cl<sup>−</sup>, F<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) by Dionex ICS-1100 ion chromatography. The turbidity was measured using the turbid meter 966 Orbeco Hellige model. Alkalinity was measured by automatic titration 862 Compact Metrohm model. Total suspended solids (TSS) were obtained by filtration and weighing. The ultrapure water (MQ) with the resistivity of 18.2 MΩ・cm was used for all analyses also used as blank. Reagent and procedural blanks were determined in parallel to the sample treatments using identical procedures. Each calibration curve was evaluated by analyses of the quality control standards before, during and after the analyses of a set of samples. The chemical results were only accepted when the charge balance error was within &#177;5%. The essential trace metals (Cr, Cd, Zn, Fe, Cu, Pb, As, Mn) and CN<sup>−</sup>, were determined using MACHEREY-NAGEL photometric method at the ‘‘Cabinet d’&#233;tude SOS environement’’ in Soa, Cameroon. Arsenic was determined by Quantofix method, Pb and Cd by Nanocolor and Cu, Zn, Cr, Mn, Fe and CN<sup>−</sup> by Visocolor ECO.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Management</title><p>Data obtained in this study was processed using standard method of hydrochemistry (Diagram software) and the calculation of Water Quality Index (WQI) and Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI). The parameters such as SAR and percent sodium (Na%) were also calculated to evaluate the suitability of the water quality for agricultural purposes.</p><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Calculation of Water Quality Index (WQI)</title><p>Initially, water quality index (WQI) was developed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref25">25</xref>] in United States by selecting 10 most commonly used water quality variables like dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, coli forms, specific conductance, alkalinity and chloride etc. and has been widely applied and accepted in European, African and Asian countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref27">27</xref>] . Furthermore, a new WQI similar to Horton’s index has also been developed by the group of Brown et al., (1970) and then by Cude, (2001) which was based on weights to individual parameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref26">26</xref>] . The WQI, which is considered to be a powerful tool that can present a comprehensive picture of river water quality, is the rate that reflects the integrated impact of different water quality variables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref12">12</xref>] . It is calculated as follows: each chemical parameter was assigned different weights (w<sub>i</sub>) in a scale of 1 (least effect on water quality) to 5 (highest effect on water quality) based on their perceived effects on primary health and according to its relative importance in the drinking water quality. The highest weight of 5 was assigned to parameters that have critical health effects and whose presence above the critical concentration limits could limit the usability of the resource for domestic and drinking purposes (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>); the minimum weight of 1 was assigned to K<sup>+</sup> because of its insignificant role in water quality assessment. Other parameters such as pH, EC, TSS, turbidity, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, F<sup>−</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, were assigned weights between 2 and 4 based on their relative significance in the water quality evaluation. The relative weight (W<sub>i</sub>) is computed from the following equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula469"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, W<sub>i</sub> is the relative weight, w<sub>i</sub> is the weight of each parameter, and n is the number of parameters. The calculated relative weight (W<sub>i</sub>) values of each parameter are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The quality rating (q<sub>i</sub>) for each parameter is assigned by dividing its concentration in each water sample by its limits values given by the WHO (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref28">28</xref>]</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Relative weight of chemical parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >WHO standards (2011)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weight (wi)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Relative weight (wi)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 - 8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;S/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NTU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.079</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125 - 130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.079</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>and the result multiplied by 100.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula470"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, q<sub>i</sub> is the quality rating, C<sub>i</sub> is the concentration of each chemical parameter in each water sample in mg/L, and S<sub>i</sub> is the drinking water standard for each chemical parameter in milligrams per liter according to the guidelines of the WHO (2011).</p><p>To calculate WQI, SI<sub>i</sub> value should be determined with the following equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula471"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula472"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, SI<sub>i</sub> is the sub-index of i<sup>th</sup> parameter; q<sub>i</sub> is the quality rating based on concentration of i<sup>th</sup><sup> </sup>parameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref11">11</xref>] . The computed WQI values are classified into five categories as follows (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Calculation of Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI)</title><p>The HPI is a very useful tool in evaluating overall pollution of water bodies with respect to heavy metals. This method is based on weighted arithmetic quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref30">30</xref>] . In this indexing, weights (w<sub>i</sub>) between 0 and 1 were assigned for each metal and the critical pollution index value is 100 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref31">31</xref>] . The rating is based on the relative importance individual quality considerations and defined as inversely proportional to the recommended standard (S<sub>i</sub>) for each parameter. The calculation of HPI involves the following steps. First, the calculation of weightage</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The WQI categories [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref32">32</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Range</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Quality</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Excellent water</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good water</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 - 200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor water</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 - 300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very poor water</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unsuitable for drinking</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(W<sub>i</sub>) of i<sup>th</sup> parameter using the formula above:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula473"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k is the proportionality constant and S<sub>i</sub> is the standard permissible value of i<sup>t</sup><sup>h</sup> parameter (adopted standard is the WHO limit 2011).</p><p>Second, the calculation of the quality (Q<sub>i</sub>) rating for each of the heavy metal.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula474"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, Q<sub>i</sub> is the sub index of i<sup>th</sup> parameter, V<sub>i</sub> is the monitored value of the i<sup>th</sup> parameter in μg/L and S<sub>i</sub> the standard or permissible limit for the i<sup>t</sup><sup>h</sup> parameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><p>After completion of the result, the concentration of each pollutant was converted into HPI.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula475"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Calculation of Sodium Percentage and Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)</title><p>To understand the water quality for irrigation purposes, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and percent sodium (Na%) are used with Wilcox and Riverside diagram. The% Na is computed with respect to relative proportions of cations present in water, where the concentrations of ions are expressed in meq/l, using the following formula:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula476"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The SAR is calculated from the ratio of sodium to calcium and magnesium, using the following formula:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77475-formula477"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>There is a close relationship between SAR value in irrigation and the extent to which Na<sup>+</sup> is absorbed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref34">34</xref>] . In fact, high concentration of dissolved ions in water can affect plants, physicochemical properties of soils and can lead to lower productivity and destruction of soil structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref35">35</xref>] .</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physicochemical Characteristics</title><p>The summary statistics of the physicochemical parameters in the study area are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The trends of seasonal variation are represented by Box plots in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The pH values of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya varied from 5.77 to 8.84 in the dry season and 5.42 to 7.58 during the wet seasons. These results show that water samples from rivers have acidic to basic properties. In general, high pH values were observed at the sampling sites LOM<sub>1</sub>, LOM<sub>3</sub> and MLB<sub>5</sub>. These basic pH values could be linked to the high gold mining activities which is carried out in the upstream portion, which experiences oil spills or leakages from excavation machinery and transportation vehicles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref37">37</xref>] . Additionally, samples taken in the dry period have high pH values compared to the wet period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)). This difference is due to a high concentration of chemical products used during exploitation which are often diffused during the rainy season. The basic to acidic pH in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya are generally higher than those observed in the other forest areas of South Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref39">39</xref>] . They are of the same order like those in gold</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical summary of physico-chemical parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Wet period</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Dry period</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Med</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Med</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;Sm/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NTH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4758.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >669.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >276.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >733.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >927.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >648.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >693.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8996.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1215.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4886.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >480.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1244.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; DL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; DL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TZ<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >845.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >580.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; DL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >276.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; DL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; DL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; DL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; DL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >733.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >927.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >648.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >693.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TZ<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;eq/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >859.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >182.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >971.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >670.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >740.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Min.: minimum, Max: maximum, Std: standard deviation, Med: median.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Trend of seasonal variation of water quality parameters in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x36.png"/></fig><p>mining basins of Lower Pra in Ghana and in the South eastern part of Senegal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>The EC values varied within a range of 12.50 - 62.90 μS/cm in dry period and 11.60 - 122.10 μS/cm in wet period. This type of water is very weakly to weakly mineralized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref40">40</xref>] like most of the water in the forest part of South Cameroon flowing on the plutono-metamorphic basement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref42">42</xref>] . The maximum EC values were determined at MLB<sub>4</sub>, MMR<sub>4</sub>, MLB<sub>5</sub> sites, during the wet period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)), and appear to depend on increasing ion contents related to pollutants from extensive mining activity in the study area. It is also important to note that EC varies from one point to another. This spatial variation is due to the importance and the intensity of mining activities around each sampling point.</p><p>The turbidity and the TSS of the studied water varied respectively from 1.22 to 276.00 NTU and from 6.60 to 4886.00 mg/L, in the dry period. During the wet season, these elements varied between 2.30 to 4758.00 NTU and 2.00 to 8996.00 mg/L. The variation of TSS is sensibly proportional to that of turbidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref43">43</xref>] . The high turbidity and TSS mainly observed around mining sites, such as MMR<sub>4</sub>, MMR<sub>5</sub> and MLB<sub>4</sub> especially in wet period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). Around these sample points, the river bed dug by excavators are washed and panned to extract gold. However, TSS and turbidity decreases in the Lom, particularly in LOM<sub>2</sub> and LOM<sub>3</sub> points, found in the mining zones. This decrease in turbidity and TSS in the Lom could be due to a high dilution. The TSS of thepresent study are higher than those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref45">45</xref>] in the Nyong, Ntem, Dja and Boumba respectively (6 ≤ TSS ≤ 30 mg/L), similar to values in forest zone of South Cameroon. The TSS and turbidity are equally higher than those of streams in the forest/savana contact zone such as the Sanaga and the Mbam (5 ≤ TSS ≤ 82 mg/L and 6 ≤TSS ≤ 350 mg/L respectively) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref5">5</xref>] . On the contrary, the high TSS and turbidity values are similar to those found in the mining sites of Amazonia, 318 &lt; TSS &lt; 2468 mg/L and 424 &lt; Turb &lt; 2874 NTU [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref46">46</xref>] . It can therefore be said that these high TSS and turbidity values were presumably a result of the activities of gold miners in this zone alongside deforestation, digging of river beds, dumping of solid and liquid waste resulting from gold washing (panning) and the high soil leaching as well as the barren materials during the rainy season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref47">47</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Major Ions</title><p>The seasonal distribution of physico-chemical parameters are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Generally, the decreasing order of magnitude of cations in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya were in the following order Na<sup>+</sup> &gt; Mg<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Ca<sup>2+</sup> &gt; K<sup>+</sup> &gt;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Sodium was the dominant cation with concentrations up to 310.27 &#181;eq/L, several times higher than other major cations. The total cationic charge TZ<sup>+</sup> varied from 72.52 to 845.16 μeq/L for an arithmetic mean of 243.10 &#177; 165.65 μeq/L. Bicarbonates and nitrates were major anions with concentrations up to 927.87 μeq /L and 276.59 μeq/L respectively. The concentration of anions decreases in the order: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>&gt; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> &gt; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> &gt; Cl<sup>−</sup> &gt; F<sup>−</sup> &gt;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The value of major equivalent anions (TZ<sup>−</sup>) varied between 37.65 μeq/L and 977.40 μeq/L with an average value of 339.86 &#177; 260.47 μeq/L.</p><p>When comparing the wet period analysis results with dry period, higher concentrations were measured in the wet period for all major ions except for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, K<sup>+</sup> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that showed high concentrations during the dry season than rainy season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(k) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(l)). This phenomenon is related to materials issued from the atmosphere, vegetation or from an anthropogenic source as the case of nitrate ions during the raining season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><p>Charge balance error was calculated for all the samples. In general the charge balance errors less than &#177;5% were accepted. According to the present study, 48% of samples have charge balances between 5 and 10%. Meanwhile, 52% of samples have ion balance slightly higher than 10% with a cationic deficit. In these cases, the deviations are attributed to an anion excess caused by a suspended contaminated load from mining and neighbouring agricultural zones around the study area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref49">49</xref>] . These results are different from those obtained in the southern Cameroon forest area by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref42">42</xref>] where anionic deficiencies are attributed to organic anions.</p><p>Two main water types have been revealed in the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) using the Piper Trilinear diagram [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref50">50</xref>] . The CaMg-HCO<sub>3</sub> water type represents 66% and NaK-HCO<sub>3</sub> type represents 34%. The predominance of these water types is indicative of the process of mineral dissolution particularly the silicate minerals. The predominance of CaMg-HCO<sub>3</sub> and NaK-HCO<sub>3</sub> is in accordance with those</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Piper diagram showing the chemical composition of surface water samples for this study from 2015-2016</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x44.png"/></fig><p>of several authors who have worked in the same geological environments in Africa and in some parts of the world.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Heavy Metals and CN<sup>−</sup></title><p>The concentration of the eight heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As, Zn, Cu, Cr, Mn, Fe) and CN<sup>−</sup> in Betare-Oya gold mining area are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. The order of abundance was: Fe &gt; Mn &gt; Pb &gt; Cr &gt; Cu &gt; Zn &gt; Cd &gt; As &gt; CN. Among them, only concentrations of As, Cu, Zn and CN<sup>−</sup> do not exceed WHO 2011 guidelines for water intended for human consumption. The metal concentrations were significantly different between sampling locations. The high concentration of heavy metals was along the streams where the separation mined minerals was carried out (gold washing pool).</p><p>Generally, the tailings from gold extraction are a major source of heavy metals in the water as well as chemical products used during the separation of gold and excavating machines (excavators and heavy duty trucks) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref52">52</xref>] . However, sometimes these elements can be derived from geological units, e.g. Cd exists in spharelite (ZnS) accompanied by Zn. Zinc also occurs in gold ore bodies in the form of sphalerite (ZnS) which is often associated with galena. Arsenic from oxidation of sulfide minerals pyrite (FeS<sub>2</sub>), arsenopyrite (FeAsS) in gold bearing rock [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref53">53</xref>] .</p><p>Given the fact that their contents were above the WHO standards, of some elements, its origin can be influenced by anthropogenic activities such as mining. Metals such as Mn. Cd, Cr, Pb are mostly leached from tailing waste, gold mine effluents or materials used during exploitation. Pb and Cr could be from exhaust pipes of heavy duty trucks, vehicles andmining machinery, Cd could be from the Ni-Cd batteries that are used in gold mining sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref51">51</xref>] . Iron generally results from the leaching of ferrallitic soils with strong complexation with humic acids. This explains the high contents of Fe in surface water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref39">39</xref>] . CN<sup>−</sup> mainly originates from artisanal small-scale mining</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Metal level in surface water of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya (&#181;/L) compared to WHO water guidelines (WHO 2011)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MRB<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MMR<sub>4</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >WHO (&#181;g/L)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >850</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >850</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CN<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(semi-mechanized manner) from gold processing (cyanidation process) which consists of leaching gold from the ore as a gold-cyanide complex and recovering the gold by precipitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref54">54</xref>] .</p><p>However, the solubility of these heavy metals is strongly governed by pH through precipitation of their oxides and hydroxides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref55">55</xref>] . In the study area most of the pH values tend to neutral-alkaline which does not allow the phenomenon of acid mine drainage but rather contaminated neutral drainage. These phenomena may contribute to significant concentrations of metals in these samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref56">56</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Processes Controlling Surface Water Chemistry</title><p>To understand the mineralization process of the water in the Mari catchment, twomethods have been applied. These are Gibbs’ model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref57">57</xref>] and saturation indices (SI).</p><sec id="s3_4_1"><title>3.4.1. Gibbs Model</title><p>The data plotted on the Gibbs’ diagram [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref57">57</xref>] in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> (TDS vs. Na<sup>+</sup> + K/(Na<sup>+</sup> + K + Ca<sup>2+</sup>) and TDS vs. Cl/Cl+HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) suggests that chemical weathering of</p><p>rocks is the major mechanism controlling the hydrochemistry in the area. The lithology consists of mostly schist, quartzite, granites, and gneisses, Na and K are mainly derived from silicate rock weathering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref58">58</xref>] . Rainwater also can contribute little amounts of Na to surface waters. The bicarbonate was the most abundant in the river water, despite the absence of a dominant carbonate lithology in the study area. The HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> could be derived from weathering of silicates rocks and CO<sub>2</sub> from soil and organic material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref59">59</xref>] . In this study, alkalinity is mainly in the form of bicarbonates. Similar results have been obtained in the southern part of Cameroon by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref39">39</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_2"><title>3.4.2. Saturation Indices (SI)</title><p>Saturation indices (SI) are used to investigate the different forms of mineral phases such as precipitated, dissolved and adsorbed phases. The result summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> showed that all the water in the Mari and Lom Rivers were undersaturated with respect to carbonate minerals (aragonite, calcite, and dolo- mite), sulfate minerals (gypsum and anhydrite), CO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O and O<sub>2</sub>, during all the study period<sub>. </sub>This indicating the tendency of waters to dissolve more of these mineral phases and/or suggesting that these mineral phases are less abundant in the corresponding host rock [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref59">59</xref>] . However, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref60">60</xref>] , the IS value in the Tawa River Central India situated in the humid tropical zone varied from negative in the monsoon, to positive values in the pre-monsoon season. They concluded that during the non-monsoon, calcite precipitation occurs and is washed off during the monsoon season. These results show that the saturation indices are a function of climate and lithology.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Water Quality Index (WQI)</title><p>To assess water quality of the river, pH, EC, Turbidity, TSS, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Major natural processes controlling water chemistry in the study area Adapted from Gibbs (1970)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x47.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of saturation indices (SI) obtained from geochemical calculations with DIAGRAMME software</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling point</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mineral phase</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Anhydrite</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aragonite</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Calcite</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dolomite</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gypsum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub> (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>O (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>2</sub> (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Halite</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CO<sub>2</sub> (g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >LOM1-LOM3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−25.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−41.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−20.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−31.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−22.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−39.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >MMR1−MMR5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−23.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−44.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−12.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−19.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−36.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−21.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−40.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >MLB1−MLB5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−9.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−25.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−42.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−20.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−33.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−21.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−39.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >MRB1−MRB3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−23.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−45.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−12.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−18.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−35.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−21.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−40.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Min: minimuim; Max: maximuim; Std: standard deviation.</p><p>Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, F<sup>−</sup> were taken into account for calculations of Water Quality Index (WQI) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). Furthermore, the World Health Organization (WHO, 2011) limits were used as standard. The computed values of WQI for the 71 water samples are between 12.589 and 5137.40; the water quality varied from “excellent” to “unsuitable for drinking”. 34% of samples represent excellent water; 17% represents good water; 21% is poor water; 11% and 17% respectively for the very poor and unsuitable water for drinking. Highest WQI values were recorded at site MMR<sub>3</sub>; MMR<sub>4</sub>; MMR<sub>5</sub>; MLB<sub>5</sub>; LOM<sub>2</sub> where an extensive mining activity is carried out. The spatial variations of WQI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) suggested significant decrease of the water quality from upstream to downstream along the Mari and Lom rivers during the study period. The WQI value for each group of samples (Lom and Mari) shows that the sites in the Lom River (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)) and the main Mari River (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)) were the two most polluted sites in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya. These results suggest that water quality in all of the above sites is controlled mainly by TSS and turbidity.</p><p>The water quality of the left tributary of Mari (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(d)) appear more deteriorated in relation to the right bank which has 66% of “excellent water” (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)). This zone is not affected by mining activities (deforestation, digging of river beds, dumping of solid and liquid waste resulting from gold washing). Similar results were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref16">16</xref>] in the Nile river in Egypt. According to this author, the water quality goes from good in the upstream to unsuitable for drinking in the down-stream, reflecting the impact of industrial activity domination on the deterioration of Nile water quality.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI)</title><p>For the HPI, the weightage (Wi) for all the four sampling points are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>. The overall heavy metal pollution index of the Mari and</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Spatial distribution of the water quality index (WQI) in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold mining area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x49.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Statistic values of WQI in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold mining area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling point</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Med</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >River Lom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>1</sub>-LOM<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >471.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mari main river</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMR1-MMR<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5137.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >527.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >River Mari right bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MRB<sub>1</sub>-MRB<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >River Mari left bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLB<sub>1</sub>-MLB<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >804.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.68</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Min: minimuim; Max: maximuim; VC: variation coefficient.</p><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Graphical data representation of WQI in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold mining area (a): Lom River; (b): Mari Main River; (c): Mari right bank; (d): Mari left bank</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x50.png"/></fig><p>Lom rivers was found to be 1195 on average, greater than the critical pollution index value of 100, above which the overall pollution level should be considered unacceptable. At all sampling points, HPI calculated is far above the critical in- dex limit of 100 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>). This indicates that the water is critically polluted with respect to heavy metals. Similar results were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref31">31</xref>] in India; and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref61">61</xref>]</p><p>in Nigeria.</p><p>Fe has the highest concentration in the Mari catchment and Lom River. Nevertheless, the weightage (Wi) given to Fe is very small. Therefore, in evaluation of HPI, this parameter does not contribute much on HPI value. However, heavy metals like Pb, Cd, As, and Cr have been given no relaxation in drinking water standard and have been given high weightage (Wi) value in HPI calculation by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref31">31</xref>] . Hence, even their smaller concentration in water samples makes the water of poor quality and gives high values of HPI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref33">33</xref>] . The presence of these undesirable elements constitutes a potential danger to human health, to the aquatic biodiversity of this area and even to the water supply project for the town of Yaounde, from the river Sanaga.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Water Quality for Irrigation Purposes</title><p>According to the percentage of sodium and electrical conductivity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(a)), all samples are suitable (excellent) for irrigation. The SAR data plotted on the US Salinity Diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(b)) showed that 99% of the samples were categorized in low, class indicating low sodium and low to moderate salinity water, which can be used safely for irrigation purposes in almost all types of soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref62">62</xref>] .</p><p>However, the presence of some metallic elements in low contents in the surface water of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya can be phytotoxic or could become phytotoxic when their concentrations eventually become higher [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77475-ref63">63</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The present study assesses the surface water quality in the B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold min</p><fig-group id="fig9"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Classification of irrigation waters (a) Wilcox, after Wilcox 1948; (b) Riverside, after US Salinity Laboratory Staff 1954.</title></caption><fig id ="fig9_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x51.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig9_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-9403194x52.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Relative weight of heavy metal pollution in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold mining area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy metals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >wi (k)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit weightage (Wi)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard permissible value (Si)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> HPI values in B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya gold mining area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling site</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wi &#215; Qi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HPI</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MRB<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >667.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1191.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMR<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >670.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1198.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >668.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1194.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOM<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >670.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1198.11</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ing area in East-Cameroon. Based on physicochemical characteristics the water is acidic to basic (5.42 &lt; pH &lt; 8.84) and very weakly to weakly mineralized. Two water types were identified: CaMg-HCO<sub>3</sub> (66%) and NaK-HCO<sub>3</sub> (34%). All the water is undersaturated with regard to carbonate and sulphate minerals indicating the tendency of water to dissolve more of these mineral phases and/or suggesting that these mineral phases are less abundant in the corresponding host rock. According to the water quality, the computed WQI values are between 12.59 and 5137.40, thus ranging from excellent to unsuitable water quality for drinking. The main pollutant sources are gold mining activities (excavating, deforestation, digging of river beds, dumping of solid and liquid waste resulting from gold washing, high soil leaching as well as the barren materials during rainy season) and agriculture. The effects of water quality parameters on the WQI map show that the highest value belongs to the TSS and Turbidity parameters compared with the other parameters. The overall HPI calculated based on the concentration of heavy metal showed that the water samples from the Mari and Lom rivers are critically contaminated with respect to heavy metals (HPI value is far above the critical index limit of 100). Based on the classification of irrigation water according to SAR and % Na values, all the sample locations are suitable for irrigation purposes. However, attention must be paid to the presence of some metallic elements in low contents in the surface water of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya. These results provide a baseline reference on the future monitoring of the Sanaga basin and its tributaries such as Mari, Mbal, Nakoyo and Lom rivers. It is also suggested that strategies of water pollution prevention should be implemented continuously for proper management in the mining areas around East Cameroon particularly in the Betare Oya zone.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This write up constitutes part of data generated during the Ph.D study of the corresponding author, in the University of Yaound&#233; I (Cameroon) in collabo- ration with the University of Antananarivo (Madagascar) and was supported by AFIMEGQ project “Africa For Innovation, Mobility, Exchange, Globalization and Quality” grant No. AF13FD0038. The authors also thank: Professor Mbacham Wilfred of the University of Yaound&#233; I for his support, the Geosciences Labora- tory of Superficial Formations and Applications, Faculty of Science, University of Yaound&#233; I and the Laboratory of Geochemical Analysis of Water (LAGE) of the Institute of Geological and Mining Research (IRGM), Nkolbisson, Cameroon where analyses were carried out.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rakotondrabe, F., Ngoupayou, J.R.N., Mfonka, Z., Rasolomanana, E.H., Abolo, A.J.N., Asone, B.L., Ako, A.A. and Rakotondrabe, M.H. (2017) Assessment of Surface Water Quality of B&#233;tar&#233;-Oya Gold Mining Area (East-Cameroon). Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 960- 984. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.98064</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.77475-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MINEE, GWP-Cmr (2009) Etat des Lieux du Secteur de L’eau au Cameroun: Eau et Environnement (Tome 1). Technical Report, Yaoundé, 235.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MINEE, GWP-Cmr (2009) Etat des Lieux du Secteur de L’eau au Cameroun: Connaissances et Usages de Ressources en Eau (Tome 2). Technical Report, Yaoundé, 184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fantong, W.Y., Kamtchueng, B.T., Ketchemen-Tandia, B., Kuitcha, D., Ndjama, J., Fouepe, A.T., Takem, G.E.I., Wirmvem, M.J., Djomou, B.S.L., Ako, A.A., Nkeng, G.E., Kusakabe, M. and Ohba, T. (2016) Variation of Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Water in Surface Flows, Shallow Wells, and Boreholes in the Coastal City of Douala (Cameroon). Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61, 2916-2929. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1173789</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liénou, G. (2007) Impact Anthropiques et Climatiques sur L’Evolution Recente de Quelques Bassins Versant Representatifs au Cameroun: Climatologie, Hydrologie, Erosion, Transport des Matieres. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngoupayou, N.J.R., Dzana, J.G., Kpoumie, A., Ghogomu, T.R., Takounjou, F.A., Braun, J.J. and Ekodeck, G.E. (2016) Present-Day Sediment Dynamics of the Sanaga Catchment (Cameroon): From the Total Suspended Sediment (TSS) to Erosion Balance. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61, 1080-1093. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.968572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakia, M. (2014) East Cameroon’s Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Bonanza: How Long Will It Last? The Futures of Small-Scale Mining in Sub-Saharan Africa. Futures, 62, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.10.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Centre d’Appui et de Promotion des Activités Minières (CAPAM) (2016) Mission de suivi environnemental des sites d’exploitations minières artisanales dans les régions de l’Est et de l’Adamaoua 44 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fon, A.F., Bih, V.C. and Cheo, E.S. (2012) Application of Electrical Resistivity and Chargeability Data on a GIS Platform in Delineating Auriferous Structures in a Deeply Weathered Lateritic Terrain, Eastern Cameroon. International Journal of Geosciences, 2, 960-971. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2012.325097</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tehna, N., Nguene, F.D., Etame, J., Ekodo, M.J.M., Tang, N.S., Suh, E.C. and Bilong, P. (2015) Impending Pollution of Betare Oya Opencast Mining Environment (Eastern Cameroon). Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 4, 37-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vishiti, A., Suh, C.E., Lehmann, B., Egbe, J.A. and Shemang, E.M. (2015) Gold Grade Variation and Particle Microchemistry in Exploration Pits of the Batouri Gold District, SE Cameroon. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 111, 1-13. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.07.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramakrishnaiah, C.R., Sadashivaiah, C. and Ranganna, G. (2009) Assessment of Water Quality Index for the Ground-Water in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India. E-Journal of Chemistry, 6, 523-530. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/757424</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Mashagbah, A.F. (2015) Assessment of Surface Water Quality of King Abdullah Canal, Using Phy-Sico-Chemical Characteristics and Water Quality Index, Jordan. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7, 339-352. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2015.74027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdel-Satar, A.M., Ali, M.H. and Goher, M.E. (2017) Indices of Water Quality and Metal Pollution of Nile River. Egypt Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 43, 21-29. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2016.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reza, R. and Singh, G. (2010) Heavy Metal Contamination and Its Indexing Approach for River Water. International Journal of Environmental Sciences Technology, 7, 785-792. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngako, V., Affaton, P., Nnange, J.M. and Njanko, T. (2003) Pan-African Tectonic Evolution in Central and Southern Cameroon: Transpression and Transtension during Sinistral Shear Movements. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 36, 207-214. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(03)00023-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kankeu, B. (2008) Anisotropie de la Susceptibilite Magnetique (ASM) et Fabriques des Roches Neoproterozoiques des Regions de Garga-Sarali et Betare-Oya a L’Est de Cameroun: Implications Geodynamiques pour L’Evolution de la Chaine Pan-Africaine de L’Afrique Centrale. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kankeu, B., Greiling, R.O. and Nzenti, J.P. (2009) Pan-African Strike-Slip Tectonics in Eastern Cameroon-Magnetic Fabrics (AMS) and Structure in the Lom Basin and Its Gneissic Basement. Precambrian Research, 174, 258-272. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2009.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soba, D. (1989) La Serie de Lom: Etude Geologique et Geochronologique D’un Bassin Volcano-Sedimentaire de la Chaine Panafricaine a L’Est de Cameroun. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toteu, S.F., Penaye, J., Deloule, E., Van Schmus, W.R. and Tchameni, R. (2006) Diachronous Evolution of Volcano-Sedimentary Basins North of the Congo Craton: Insights from U-Pb Ion Microprobe Dating of Zircons from the Poli, Lom and Yaounde’ Groups (Cameroon). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44, 428-442. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freyssinet, P., Lecomte, P. and Edimo, A. (1989) Dispersion of Gold and Base Metals in the Mborguéné Lateritic Profile, East Cameroun. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 32, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(89)90050-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toteu, S.F., Van, S.W.R., Penaye, J. and Michard, A. (2001) New U-Pb and Sm-Nd Data from North-Central Cameroon and Its Bearing on the Pre-Pan African History of Central Africa. Precambrian Research, 108, 45-73. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(00)00149-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Segalen</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1967</year>)<article-title>Les Sols et la Geomorphologie du Cameroun</article-title><source> Cahier ORSTOM Series Pédologique</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage>137</fpage>-<lpage>187</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nollet, L.M.L. (2007) Hand Book of Water Analysis. 2nd Edition, Taylor &amp; Francis Group, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodier, J. (2009) L’analyse de L’eau Naturelle, Eaux Résiduaires, Eau de Mer. 9th Edition, Dunod, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Horton</surname><given-names> R.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1965</year>)<article-title>An Index-Number System for Rating Water Quality</article-title><source> Journal of Water Pollution</source><volume> 37</volume>,<fpage> 300</fpage>-<lpage>306</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aenab, A.M., Singh, S.K. and Al-Rubaye, A.A.M. (2012) Evaluation of Tigris River by Water Quality Index Analysis Using C++ Program. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 4, 523-527. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2012.47061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ewaid, S.H. and Abed, S.A. (2017) Water Quality Index for Al-Gharraf River, Southern Iraq. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2017.03.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Recommandations. 4th Edition, World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasad, B. and Sangita, K. (2008) Heavy Metal Pollution Index of Ground Water of an Abandoned Open Cast Mine Filled with Fly Ash: a Case Study. Mine Water and the Environment, 27, 265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-008-0050-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, G. and Rakesh, K.K. (2016) Heavy Metal Contamination and Its Indexing Approach for Groundwater of Goa Mining Region, India. Applied Water Sciences, 7, 1479-1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0430-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhardwaj, R., Gupta, A. and Garg, J.K. (2017) Evaluation of Heavy Metal Contamination Using Environmetrics and Indexing Approach for River Yamuna, Delhi Stretch, India. Water Sciences, 31, 52-66. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsj.2017.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Batabyal, A.K. and Chakraborty, S. (2015) Hydrogeochemistry and Water Quality Index in the Assessment of Groundwater Quality for Drinking Uses. Water Environment Research, 87, 7. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14212658613956</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohan, S.V., Nithila, P. and Reddy, S.J. (1996) Estimation of Heavy Metal in Drinking Water and Development of Heavy Metal Pollution Index. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, A-31, 283-289. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529609376357</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilcox, L.V. (1948) Classification and Use of Irrigation Waters. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 962.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">US Salinity Laboratory Staff (1954) Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Agricultural Handbook No. 60. United States Department Of Agriculture, Washington DC, 160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahialey, E.K., Serfoh-Armah, Y. and Kortatsi, B.K. (2010) Hydrochemical Analysis of Groundwater in the Lower Pra Basin of Ghana. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2, 864-871. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2010.210103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahima, M., Moctar, D., Maguette, D.N., Diakher, M.H., Malick, N.P. and Serigne, F. (2015) Evaluation of Water Resources Quality in Sabodala Gold Mining Region and Its Surrounding Area (Senegal). Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7, 247-263. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2015.73020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Viers, J., Dupre, B., Braun, J.J., Deberdt, S., Angeletti, B., Ngoupayou, N.J.R. and Michard, A. (2000) Major and Trace Element Abundances, and Strontium Isotopes in the Nyong Basin Rivers Cameroon Constraints on Chemical Weathering Processes and Elements Transport Mechanisms in Humid Tropical Environments. Chemical Geology, 169, 211-241. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00298-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braun, J.J., Marechal, J.C., Riotte, J., Boeglin, J.L. and Bedimo, B.J.P. (2012) Elemental Weathering Fluxes and Saprolite Production Rate in a Central African Lateritic Terrain (Nsimi, South Cameroon). Geochimica et Cosmochimica, 99, 243-270. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.09.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Detay, M. (1993) Le Forage D’eau, Réalisation, Entretien, Réhabilitation. Masson, Paris, 375.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boeglin, J.L., Ndam, J.R. and Braun, J.J. (2003) Composition of the Different Reservoir Waters in a Tropical Humid Area: Example of the Nsimi Catchment (Southern Cameroon). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 37, 103-110. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(03)00041-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braun, J.J., Ngoupayou, N.J.R., Viers, J., Dupre, B., Bedimo, B.J.P., Boeglin, J.L., Robain, H., Nyeck, B., Freydier, R., Nkamdjou, S.L., Rouiller, J. and Muller, J.P. (2005) Present Weathering Rates in a Humid Tropical Watershed: Nsimi Site (South Cameroon). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 357-387. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2004.06.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rügner, H., Schwientek, M., Beckingham, B., Kuch, B. and Grathwohl, P. (2013) Turbidity as a Proxy for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Particle Facilitated Pollutant Transport in Catchments. Environmental Earth Sciences, 69, 373-380. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2307-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sigha, L. (1994) Fonctionnement Hydrochimique D’un Ecosysteme Forestier de L’Afrique Centrale: La Ngoko a Mouloundou (Sud-Est du Cameroun). Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris XI Orsay, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olivry, J.C. (1977) Transports Solides en Suspension au Cameroun. In: Erosion and Solid Matter Transport in Inland Water, Paris, International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publisher, Potsdam, 134-141.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mol, J.H. and Ouboter, P.E. (2004) Downstream Effects of Erosion from Small-Scale Gold. Conservation Biology, 18, 201-214. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00080.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Betancourt, O., Narvaez, A. and Roulet, M. (2005) Southern Ecuador: A Study of Environmental Impacts and Human Exposures. EcoHealth, 2, 323-332. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-005-8462-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woocay, A. and Walton, J. (2008) Multivariate Analyses of Water Chemistry: Surface and Ground Water Interactions. Ground Water, 3, 437-449. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00404.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aranguren, S.M.M., Probst, A., Roulet, M. and Isaure, M.P. (2008) Contamination of Surface Waters by Mining Wastes in the Milluni Valley (Cordillera Real, Bolivia): Mineralogical and Hydrological Influences. Applied Geochemistry, 23, 1299-1324. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.11.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piper, A.M. (1944) A Graphic Procedure in the Geochemical Interpretation of Water Analyses. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 25, 914-923. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pahimi, H., Panda, C.R., Ngassoum, M.B. and Tchameni, R. (2015) Environmental Impacts of Mining in the Volcano-Sedimentary Basins of Cameroon: Case Study of Artisanal Gold Mine Tailings (Betare Oya, East-Cameroon). International Journal of Energy, Sustainability and Environmental Engineering, 2, 5-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J., Li, F., Liu, Q. and Zhang, Y. (2014) Trace Metal in Surface Water and Groundwater and Its Transfer in a Yellow River Alluvial Fan: Evidence from Isotopes and Hydrochemistry. Science of the Total Environment, 472, 979-988. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y.Z., Abuduwaili, J. and Feng, Q.J. (2015) Heavy Metal Contamination, Sources, and Pollution Assessment of Surface Water in the Tianshan Mountains of China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 33. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4191-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jdid, E.A. and Blazy, P. (2006) Métallurgie de L’or-Procédés. Techniques de L’ingénieur, 1, 16 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, X., Sillanpaa, M., Gjessing, E.T. and Peraniemi, V.R.D. (2010) Environmental Impact of Mining Activities on the Surface Water Quality in Tibet: Gyama Valley. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 4177-4184. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plante, B., Bussière, B. and Benzaazoua, M. (2014) Lab Tofield Scale Effects on Contaminated Neutral Drainage Prediction from the TIO Mine Waste Rocks. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 137, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gibbs, R.J. (1970) Mechanisms Controlling World Water Chemistry. Science, 17, 1088-1090. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.170.3962.1088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamtchueng, B.T., Fantong, W.Y., Wirmvem, M.J., Tiodjio, R.E., Takounjou, A.F., Ndam Ngoupayou, J.R., Kusakabe, M., Zhang, J., Ohba, T., Tanyileke, G., Hell, J.V. and Ueda, A. (2016) Hydrogeochemistry and Quality of Surface Water and Groundwater in the Vicinity of Lake Monoun, West Cameroon: Approach from Multivariate Statistical Analysis and Stable Isotopic Characterization. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188, 524. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5514-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youmbi, T.J.G., Feumba, R., Wethe, J., Ekodeck, G.E. and Marsily, G. (2012) Evaluation of Groundwater Suitability for Domestic and Irrigational Purposes: A Case Study from Mingoa River Basin, Yaounde, Cameroon. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 4, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2012.45031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehto, A. and Chakrapani, G.J. (2013) Spatio-Temporal Variation in the Hydrochemistry of Tawa River, Central India: Effect of Natural and Anthropogenic Factors. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 9789. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3291-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ameh, E.G. and Akpah, F.A. (2011) Heavy Metal Pollution Indexing and Multivariate Statistical Evaluation of Hydrogeochemistry of River Povpov in Itakpe Iron-Ore Mining Area Kogi State, Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research, 2, 33-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Richards, L.A. (1954) Diagnostics and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soil. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77475-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, B. (2016) Natural Water Quality and Its Suitability for Drinking and Irrigation Purposes in the Jungar Basin, Central Asia. Journal of Civil &amp; Environmental Engineering, 6, 232. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-784X.1000232</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>