<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NJGC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>New Journal of Glass and Ceramics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7554</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/njgc.2017.73005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NJGC-77368</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  DC Electrical Conductivity Studies of GeO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Doped Lead Vanadate Glass System
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>P.</surname><given-names>Tejeswararao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>D.</surname><given-names>L. Sastry</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, GITAM Institute of Science and Technology, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>teja_msc_phy@yahoo.co.in(PT)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>57</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>30,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Temperature dependent DC electrical conductivity studies of GeO2 substituted lead vanadate glass systems xGeO
  <sub>2</sub>
  (50-x)PbO:50V
  <sub>2</sub>
  O
  <sub>5</sub>
   (x = 5, 10, 15 mole%) were carried out and the results are reported. X-ray diffraction results reveal that all samples are perfect amorphous in nature. DSC results indicate that the substituent GeO
  <sub>2</sub>
   is replacing PbO in the glass network in such a way that the eutectic composition is maintained. DC electrical conductivity studies of the glass samples indicate that the systems are characterized by different activation energies in different temperature ranges which in turn depend on the annealing temperature. These results are interpreted in terms of temperature dependent microstructural changes in these glass systems.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>XRD</kwd><kwd> DSC</kwd><kwd> DC Conductivity</kwd><kwd> Semiconducting Glasses</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In view of their potential applications, research on amorphous semi-conductors in thin film or bulk form has been receiving increased attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref2">2</xref>] . Semi- conducting oxide glasses like lead vanadate form an important class of the amorphous semiconductors and are being studied in great detail [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref4">4</xref>] . In addition to their applications, basic understanding of the physical properties of these materials is of a great fundamental importance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref6">6</xref>] in research on these materials. Considering the enormous variation in their composition, the scope for research on these materials is also very wide. Recent studies in this laboratory have indicated that lead metavanadate glass systems exhibit interesting changes in their physical properties depending on the substitution of different metal oxides in the place of lead oxide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref8">8</xref>] . In the conventional silicate based glasses, electrical conduction takes place due to ionic transport. In semi-conducting glasses the electrical conduction is due to the transport of electrons. These vanadate glasses are known to contain V<sup>4+</sup> and V<sup>5+</sup> ions and conduction is attributed to hopping of a 3d<sup>1</sup> electron from V<sup>4+</sup> to V<sup>5+</sup> site. Among vanadate glasses, PbO:V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> has received greater attention because of its wider glass-forming region in the phase diagram. The present paper, the results obtained in the dc electrical conductivity and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements carried out on lead vanadate glass system in which PbO was systematically substituted by GeO<sub>2</sub> are discussed. Although vanadium based glasses have been studied extensively, most of the reports in literature are found on the binary glass systems like GeO<sub>2</sub>-V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref9">9</xref>] and GeO<sub>2</sub>-PbO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref10">10</xref>] but so far no investigation has been reported on the GeO<sub>2</sub>-PbO-V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass system. The results are expected to be interesting since GeO<sub>2</sub> is also a glass former.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>A series of glass samples with the molar formula xGeO<sub>2</sub>(50−x)PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (x = 5, 10, 15 in molar ratio) were prepared. Appropriate amounts of reagent grade GeO<sub>2</sub>, PbO and V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> were well mixed and melted in silica crucibles using an electrical furnace at a temperature ranging between 950˚C - 1000˚C range, depending on the glass composition. The melt was stirred frequently to ensure the homogeneity molten compound. The melts were quenched on a large stainless steel block maintained at room temperature (≈30˚C) and constituting of 9 mm cylindrical cavities to get circular disc shaped samples of 2 to 3 mm width. The glass samples were annealed at 150˚C below the glass transition temperature for nearly 2 hours. The samples were washed with an acetone and dried. The glasses were stored in desiccators until required.</p><p>In the present studies, XRD recordings of the powdered glass samples were recorded with the help of a PAN Alytic X’Pert-PRO diffractrometer using Cu Kα radiation at 1.5418 Ǻ and diffractrometer settings in the 2θ range from 10˚C - 70˚C by changing the 2θ with a step size of 0.02˚. The density (D) was determined at room temperature using Archimedes principle. The samples were weighed using an electrical balance (Dhona Model 200D) of 0.0001 gm accuracy. The weight loss was measured in an acetone (Aldrich) of 99.5% Purity and density 0.789 gm/cm<sup>3</sup>. The molar volume (V<sub>m</sub>) was calculated using the formula given below</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77368-formula1"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here M<sub>i</sub> is the molecular mass for component i and n<sub>i</sub> is molar ratio and D is density of the sample.</p><p>In the present studies, DuPont, USA make model 2000 thermal analyzer was used to determine the glass transformation temperature (T<sub>g</sub>), crystallization temperature (T<sub>c</sub>) and melting temperature (T<sub>m</sub>). DSC scans were conducted using 5 - 10 mg ground as-cast glass specimens which are heated with heating rate of 10˚C/min between 0˚C and 600˚C in a platinum crucible. Alumina powder was used as the reference material. The DC electrical conductivity studies were carried out by using a two probe technique. A homemade muffle furnace using a super kanthal wire as a heating element was used for temperature variation studies in the range 300 K - 500 K. Temperatures of the furnace as well as the sample are monitored by using a Cr-Al thermocouples. The resistance of the samples was measured using a Keithaly (Model 614) digital electrometer. The conductivity was calculated from knowledge of the geometry of the sample using the expression.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77368-formula2"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x3.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where R<sub>X</sub> is the resistance, t is the thickness and A is the area of the sample.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The X-ray diffractograms of samples annealed at 150˚C show no trace of crystallinity and are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(A). The annealing of the samples up to 225˚C did not induce any change in the diffractograms showing that the samples remained amorphous as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(B) for the case of the sample containing x = 15 mole% of GeO<sub>2</sub>. Baiochi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref11">11</xref>] and Calestani et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref12">12</xref>] identified metastable phases in the 1:1 molar system. These metastable phases are a modification of the lead metavanadate (PbV<sub>2</sub>O<sub>6</sub>) or lead pyrometavanadte (PbV<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>). All the metastable phases convert to stable lead metavanadate before eutectic melting. DSC recordings of the GeO<sub>2</sub>-PbO-V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass systems are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. These are different when compared to those of the unsubstituted system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref13">13</xref>] . Values of glass transition temperature T<sub>g</sub>, crystallization temperature T<sub>c</sub>, melting temperature T<sub>m</sub>, and glass forming tendency K<sub>g</sub> obtained from the DSC recordings are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. There is a slight change in the T<sub>g</sub> along with an increase in the number of crystallization peaks, the T<sub>g</sub> values decrease with increasing GeO<sub>2</sub> contents, these results suggest that GeO<sub>2</sub> acts as a network modifier where as PbO acts as a network former. Crystallization temperature T<sub>c</sub> is the maximum of the crystallization peak and onset of crystallization temperature, T<sub>x</sub> is the temperature at the beginning of the first exothermic reaction where the crystallization starts.</p><p>As seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, up to x = 15 mole% there is only one endothermic peak corresponding to the melting point. This indicates that the substituted samples behave like the eutectic composition up to x = 15 mole%, the endothermic peak corresponding to melting exhibits a small shoulder when the amount of GeO<sub>2</sub> substitution exceeds 15 mole%. DSC patterns showed a splitting of the melting point peak (not included in the present studies) which indicates the probability of new phases being formed when the samples contain GeO<sub>2</sub> higher than 15 mole%. It can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> that there is an increase in the number of peaks corresponding to T<sub>c</sub> which is an indication of an increase in the number of metastable phases being formed which finally transforms to a single stable phase. In order to understand the devitrification tendency and thermal stability of the glasses, glass forming tendency values K<sub>g</sub> are calculated using the equation given below [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> (A) X-ray diffractograms of xGeO<sub>2</sub>(50−x)PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass system annealed at 150˚C. (a) x = 5 mole% (b) x = 10 mole% (c) x = 15 mole%; (B) X-ray diffractograms of 15GeO<sub>2</sub>35PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass system annealed at 225˚C.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label> (B)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x4.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x5.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Differential scanning calorimetry curves of xGeO<sub>2</sub>(50−x)PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass system. (A) x = 5 mole% (B) x = 10 mole% (C) x = 15 mole%</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x6.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.77368-formula3"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These values are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Lower K<sub>g</sub> value suggests higher tendency of crystallization and lower thermal stability. K<sub>g</sub> represents the temperature interval during nucleation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77368-ref15">15</xref>] . From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, it can be seen that that the 15GeO<sub>2</sub>35PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glasses, with a K<sub>g</sub> value of 0.123, have the lowest thermal stability among all the four compositions. The densities and molar volumes of xGeO<sub>2</sub>(50−x)PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (x = 5, 10 and 15 mole %) samples determined in the present studies are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The densities seem to decrease with an increase in GeO<sub>2</sub> substitution.</p><p>The temperature dependence of logarithmic conductivity of the samples annealed at 150˚C is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. It can be seen that the temperature dependent conductivity of the 50PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> sample shows Arrhenius variation, where as GeO<sub>2</sub> doped samples indicate slight departure from Arrhenius type of variation. The log<sub>10</sub>𝜎 vs 1/T plot approaches straight line behaviour as GeO<sub>2</sub> concentration is increased from 5 mole% to 15 mole%. The activation energies were calculated for two temperature ranges, for which the log<sub>10</sub>𝜎 Vs 1/T variation is almost a straight line being characterized by single activation energy. The two temperature ranges chosen were (i) 300 K - 350 K (ii) 350 K - 500 K. The activation energies calculated in the respective temperature ranges are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. In the higher temperature region i.e., temperature range 350 K - 500 K, the activation energies for GeO<sub>2</sub> doped samples are less than the activation energy of undoped 50PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass sample.</p><p>In the lower temperature region i.e., in the temperature range 300 K - 350 K the activation energies of 5 mole% and 10 mole% GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted samples are</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Temperature dependence of logarithmic conductivity of xGeO<sub>2</sub>(50−x)PbO: 50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass system annealed at 150˚C</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Values of glass transition temperature (T<sub>g</sub>), crystallization temperature (T<sub>c</sub>), melting temperature (T<sub>m</sub>), glass forming tendency (K<sub>g</sub>), Density (D) and molar volume (V<sub>m</sub>) for the xGeO<sub>2</sub>(1−x)PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content<sub> </sub> (mole %)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PbO content (mole %)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GeO<sub>2</sub> content (mole %)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>g </sub> (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>c </sub> (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>m </sub> (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>g </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>m</sub> (cm<sup>3</sup>/mol)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300,412</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.075</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >327,397,420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >494</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.079</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325,394,419</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.923</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >295,308,388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.656</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Activation energies obtained at different temperature regions by fitting Mott’s model for GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted lead Vanadate glasses</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Glass composition (mole%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Activation energies of the samples annealed at 150˚C W (eV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Activation energies of the samples annealed at 225˚C W (eV)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >PbO</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >GeO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Temperature range (K)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Temperature range (K)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 - 350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350 - 500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 - 350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350 - 420</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.143</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.398</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.396</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.425</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>more than that of the unsubstituted 50PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass sample. As the concentration of GeO<sub>2</sub> substitution is increased to 15 mole% the activation energy decreases becoming less than that of the unsubstituted sample. Even though there is no marked increase in conductivity when compared to that of the unsubstituted sample, the decrease in the activation energy for the GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted samples in the temperature range 350 K - 500 K indicates that the participation of GeO<sub>2</sub> in the glass network assists polaron hopping by decreasing the energy barrier between polaron hopping sites. To understand if the conductivity of the samples is influenced by the annealing temperature, the samples were annealed at 225˚C, a temperature which was below the glass transition temperature and conductivity measurements were carried out. The log<sub>10</sub>𝜎 vs 1/T plots in this case are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. It can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> the conductivities of all the samples increased in the temperature range of study.</p><p>The undoped 50PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> sample still indicated Arrhenius behavior in its conductivity plot, being characterized by activation energy of 0.143 eV which is slightly smaller than the 0.175 eV of the sample annealed at 150˚C. However GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted samples indicated a temperature dependence of conductivity which can be divided into three regions with temperature ranges (i) 300 K - 340 K (ii) 350 K - 420 K (iii) 420 - 500 K. The activation energies obtained in the ranges (i) and (iii) are closer to the activation energy of the undoped samples whereas in the region characterized by temperature range (ii), the activation energies of GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted samples are higher. All the GeO<sub>2</sub> doped samples are characterized by higher conductivities and lower activation energies when compared to those of the undoped 50PbO:50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> sample. The present results also indicate that GeO<sub>2</sub> substitution for PbO in the amorphous xGeO<sub>2</sub>(50−x)PbO: 50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> samples affects the glass network differently at different annealing temperatures. At a given annealing temperature the GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted samples exhibit different activation energies in different temperature ranges indicating that GeO<sub>2</sub> participation in the glass network affects the Polaron hopping energy differently in different temperature ranges. As the annealing temperature is increased there may be a change in the value of C i.e. Concentration of V<sup>4+</sup> ions (C = No. of V<sup>4+</sup> ions/total no. of vanadium ions).</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Temperature dependence of logarithmic conductivity of xGeO<sub>2</sub>(50−x)PbO: 50V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> glass system annealed at 225˚C</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1030166x9.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Perfect vitrification has been achieved for all the glass samples as can be seen from the X-ray diffractograms of the as prepared samples after annealing at 150˚C or 225˚C for two hours. DSC recordings show that eutectic composition of the lead meta vanadate has been maintained for all the glass systems upto 15 mole% of substitution. Only in the case of 15 mole% GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted samples there is a tendency for deviation from eutectic melting as is evidenced by the appearance of a small shoulder above the peak corresponding to eutectic melting in its DSC thermogram. The DSC data also indicate that all the GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted glass systems are characterized by more than one crystallization peak. This can be thought that of as an evidence for the existence of more than one meta stable phase in the glass systems. The dopant GeO<sub>2</sub> is not divalent oxides like PbO. Besides GeO<sub>2</sub> is known to be glass former unlike PbO which is considered to be a glass modifier. In spite of these differences, the present observations indicate that the substituent is replacing PbO in the glass network in such way that the eutectic composition is maintained and the final devitrified system has a crystal structure that is similar to that of lead meta vanadate. The temperature dependent DC electrical conductivity studies of the glass samples annealed at 150˚C indicate that the GeO<sub>2</sub> substituted glass samples are characterized by slightly different activation energies in different temperature regions. When these systems were annealed at a higher temperature of 225˚C the temperature dependent DC electrical conductivity studies revealed the existence of three different temperature regions characterized by different activation energies. These differences are attributed to not only a change in the value of C (Concentration of V<sup>4+</sup>) but also a change in the microstructure of the glass system.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tejeswararao, P. and Sastry, D.L. (2017) DC Electrical Conductivity Studies of GeO<sub>2</sub> Doped Lead Van- adate Glass System. New Journal of Glass and Ceramics, 7, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.4236/njgc.2017.73005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.77368-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghosh, A. (1988) Memory Switching in Bismuth-Vanadate Glasses. Journal of Applied Physics, 64, 2652-2655. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.341605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirashima, H., Ide, M. and Yoshida, Ts. (1986) Memory switching of V2O5-TeO2 Glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 86, 327-335.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(86)90021-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mustafa, Y.M., Mansour, E., El-Damrawi, G.M., Abd El-Maksoud, S. and Doweidar, H. (2001) Memory Switching of Fe2O3-BaO-V2O5 Glasses. Physica B, 305, 242-249  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(01)00622-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sujatha, B. and Reddy, C.N. (2006) Electrical Switching Behaviour in Lead Phosphovanadate Glasses. Turkish Journal of Physics, 30, 189-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szu, S. and Lu, S.G. (2007) AC Impedance Studies of Image Containing Glasses. Physica B, 391, 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2006.09.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghosh, A. and Sen, S. (1999) Structure and Other Physical Properties of Magnesium Vanadate Glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 258, 29-33.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(99)00562-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tejeswararao, P., Ramesh, K.V. and Sastry, D.L. (2012) Electrical and Spectroscopic Studies of the CdO Substituted Lead Vanadate Glass System vs Crystalline Form. New Journal of Glass and Ceramics, 2, 34-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tejeswararao, P., Ramesh, K.V. and Sastry, D.L. (2016) ESR and DC Electrical Properties of Bi2O3-PbO-V2O5 Glass System. Physics and Chemistry of Glasses— European Journal of Glass Science and Technology Part B, 57, 279-284.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M.N., Khawaja, E.E., Save, D., Kutub, A.A. and Hogarth, C.A. (2007) Electrical Conductivity of Semiconducting V2O5-GeO2 Glasses. International Journal of Electronics, 56, 395-401.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Topping, J.A. (1974) Elastic Properties of Glasses in the System PbO-GeO2. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 57, 455.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baiocchi, E., Bettinelli, M., Motenero, A. and Disipio, A. (1982) New Phases in Equimolar PbO-V2O5 System. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 43, 63.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(82)90215-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calestani, G., Andreeti, G.D., Montenero, A. and Bettinelli, M. (1985) Structures of Metastable Lead Metavanadates: The Orthorhombic PbV2O6 (III) Modification. Acta Crystallographica Section C, C41, 179-182.  
https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270185003237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramesh, K.V. (2000) Thermal, Electrical and Spectroscopic Studies of CuO, ZnO and TiO2 Substituted for PbO in Eutectic Lead Vanadate Glass System. Ph.D. Thesis, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kozmidis-Petrovic, A.F. (2010) Theoretical Analysis of Relative Changes of the Hruby, Weinberg, and Lu-Liu Glass Stability Parameters with Application on Some Oxide and Chalcogenide Glasses. Themochimica Acta, 499, 54-60.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2009.10.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77368-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murugan, G.S. and Ohishi, Y. (2004) TeO2-BaO-SrO-Nb2O5 Glasses: A New Glass System for Waveguide Devices Applications. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 341, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.04.006</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>