<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2017.76058</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-77336</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Petrology and Geochemical Properties of the Granitoid Complex of Chahar-Gonbad, Southeast Iran
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdolhamid</surname><given-names>Ansari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seyed</surname><given-names>Jamal Sheikh Zakariaii</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sara</surname><given-names>Dargahi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohsen</surname><given-names>Arvin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Geology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Geology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>j.Sheikhzakria@gmail.com(SJSZ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>847</fpage><lpage>858</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>7,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>27,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Chargonbad batholite is located in Sirjan and southeast of magmatic zone of Urumieh-Dokhtar. The main volume of this rocks consisted of Granodiorite and Monzogranite, but it’s also consists of Quartzdiorite, Tonalite and Syenogranite. They have allotrimorphic granular texture with subordinate porphyritic texture. Their enclaves consist of: xenoliths enclaves, microgranular mafic enclaves (Diorite to Quartzdiorite in composition) and autolite enclaves (Tonalite, granodiorite and monzogranite in composition). The Chargonbad batholite rocks are also cut by different types of dykes which are mainly consisted of dykes and veins of pegmatic stage, microgranular dykes (andesit and andesit basaltic in composition) and microgranular dykes that are similar to mafic enclaves. Evidence shows that regional examples represent properties of granitoids type I. As well as, Granite of Granitoid body of this area has magnesium nature and shows the cordellarian granites features. Based on the tectonomagmatic environment determination diagrams, all samples from the Chahargonbad study area located in the arc island setting due to subduction and show the characteristic of active continental margin setting.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Petrology and Geochemical Properties Granitoid Complex</kwd><kwd> Southeast Iran</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Chahar Gonbad granitoid mass is situated in geographic longitudes (56˚10' - 56˚21') and latitudes (29˚34' - 29˚34') at 80 km distant from northeast of Sirjan zone and 32 km at northwest of Belord county in Kerman province and with respect to structural-sedimentary divisions of Iran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref1">1</xref>] and it is located at southeast of Uremia-Dokhtar magmatic belt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref2">2</xref>] . Most of granitoids is composed of granitoid to granodiorite at southwest of Kerman and they are metaluminous and calc-alkaline [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref3">3</xref>] . The rocks which include this granitoid mass are Eocene volcanic-sedimentary complex that is the oldest rock unit in this zone and it is well visible at south and east of this region. Given the granitic rocks have only crossed Eocene rocks one can attribute these rocks at least to post-Eocene magmatism in terms of age where they have intrude and placed due to performance of Chahar Gonbad fault. Several dikes have crossed this plutonic mass where their array has also crossed Eocene volcanic-sedimentary complex as well. The studied rocks in Chahar Gonbad zone were divided into four groups of extrusive and intrusive igneous rocks, xenolith, and clastic igneous rocks. The extrusive igneous rocks are as follows: 1) andesite, 2) rhyolite, and 3) dolerite. Intrusive igneous rocks include i) diorite with quartz content, ii) tonalite, iii) granodiorite, and iv) granite (monzogranite and syenogranite). Rocks in xenolith groups and clastic igneous group of rocks comprise of tuffs. We will examine the evidences of magmatic evolution in granitoid rocks in this zone in the following. This study is intended to explore petrographic and geochemical evidences of magmatic evolution in granitoid rocks in Chahar Gonbad zone and determine tectonic environment of rocks in this zone.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geostrategic</title><p>Tectonic factors in the westward and SW of Iran could be classified such 1) UDMC, 2) Sirjan-Sanadaj Region and 3) Zagros Fold-Thrust [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The UDMC includes Eocene-Quaternary plutonic and volcanic stones 4 km thicknesses and 50 km long [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref5">5</xref>] . But, the utmost of the magmatic action happened at Eocene which contains different of volcanic stones. However, Cretaceous parts were discernible in this region north too (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The volcanic action was expelled in Upper Miocene and extended by Pliocene-Quaternary and identified by basaltic dacites and andesites as lava runs and heads and volcanic detritus flow. The emplacement age of these stones has not been delimited via geochronological period, however, according to stratigraphical investigations; the mentioned stones are fresher than Miocene. Apparently, the present volcanic action started in the late Miocene and extended by Pliocene. The UD volcanic stones have several, chemical, mechanical and petrological from acidic to primary and so creation conditions from continental to low marine depth. The acidic igneous masses were in sufficient associated via average till primary stones and frequently made because of continental shell melting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Tafresh region is a section of the UDMC found in the center Iran. The UDMC is a portion of the Alpe-Himalayan orogenic belt and located within Arabian and Eurasian range in the same bias via Sirjan-Sanandaj changed region (North- west, East south). The magmatic of the proposed belt is a debated issue, as some of the researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref7">7</xref>] correlate it to the intracontinental cracks. Whereas other reserachers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref9">9</xref>] offer the subduction of the Neotethyan oceanic lithosphere</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Schematic of Iran map, displaying the division of the main sedimentary and tectonic parts. The Urumieh- Dokhtar magmatic arc is of regularly Eocene-Miocene age, some of the other volcanic stones are older</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x3.png"/></fig><p>under the center Iran plate as the cause of the magmatic.</p><p>The principal purposes of the current research are to show geochemical aspects, as well as recognized area links of the Chahar-Gonbad complex, to characterize igneous magmatism, discover it’s the main source and the tectonic situation in the Sirjan-Sanandej District and to cast light on the Rocky history and associated magnates in Iran. The information in the present work is essential for the recognition of the appearance of a subduction region in South-west of Iran over the Cenozoic.</p>Context of Geological<p>The Chahar-Gonbad granitoid complex is located 80 km north east of Sirjan city, Kerman province, southeast of Iran, which lies between 29˚34'N - 29˚42'N and between 56˚10'E - 56˚21'E (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Chahar-Gonbad granitoids contain quartz diorite, Tonalite, synogranite, granodiorite and monzogranite. The granodiorites were extensive through the region and the largest interference in the region. They are white, gray to pinkish and commonly medium to coarse-grained stones and have a granular to porphyritic form presenting a plain Mineralogy: Plagioclase (35 - 45 percent mod.), K-feldspar (9 - 20 percent mod.), Quartez (21 - 40 percent mod.), Biotite (more than ten percent mod.) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Materials and Methods</title><p>Approximately 100 examples of the granitoid stones gathered from various facies. To correctly characterize their chemical structures, 20 fresh specimens were taken for principal, track, and rare-earth-elements (REE) investigation. Principal and track factor wealth were discovered by inductively joined plasma atomic effusion and inductively joined plasma-mass spectrometries at the Karaj Standard labs in Iran. The scientific methods are explained in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Geochemical properties</p><p>The SiO<sub>2</sub> amount of cases changes between 53 by 76 wt percent (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Large share of cases make approximate linear to curvilinear biases of reducing MnO, TiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>*, MgO, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, and CaO, and developing Na<sub>2</sub>O and K<sub>2</sub>O via growing SiO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The models of these in the Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, CaO, MgO, FeO, TiO<sub>2</sub> versus SiO<sub>2</sub> figures show decreasing trend versus increased SiO<sub>2</sub> plot. These models recommend that fractionation and crystallization of plagioclase, hornblende, a Ti-bearing state, and apatite should have performed functions in the stones.</p><p>Harker pictures of the principal factors show amazing biases recommending</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Total Akkali versus SiO<sub>2</sub> f for major factors of the Chahar- Gonbad Granitoid complex</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x4.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Molar <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>diagram, (b) Granitoied type identification by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Vs. SiO<sub>2</sub>.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x5.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x8.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>obviously that the monzogranites and granodiorites might be related to fractional crystallization procedures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>In the microscopic <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>[A/CNK versus A/NK] figure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref11">11</xref>] the quartz-diorites structure, granodiorites, monzogranites scheme to the meta luminous area. The rate of The molecular A/CNK of these rocks are in the range of [1 - 1.1] of A/CNK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)), so the stones were of I-kind in the presence of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref12">12</xref>] , so, these rocks fall in magnesian type of granitoieds and related to cordillerian types of grnitic rocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>All samples shown low-K affiliation based on the K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> figure of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref14">14</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)) and are sub-alkaline relation and relate to the calc-alkaline set from the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref15">15</xref>] distribution system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)).</p><p>Tectonic context of emplacement and magma generation</p><p>The Chahar-Gonbad Granitic Complex is normally made of a Medium-K calk-alkaline set (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)) in that quartz-diorite, monzogranite, and granodiorite were the predominant stone models. Area associations, geochemistry, and petrography these stones present community to interventions standard of the dynamic continental boundaries. Various investigations recommend that trace parts could be utilized to distinguish among the various tectonic contexts of granitoid magmas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref13">13</xref>] . The Chahar-Gonbad granitoid in the geotectonic distribution of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref15">15</xref>] are incorporated as volcanic arc stones (Figures 6(a)-(d)). Moreover, as explained beforehand, granitoid of the Chahar-Gonbad field improved in LILE like Rb and Cs, concerning the HFSE, particularly Nb and Ti (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Magmas via these geochemical characteristics are frequently ascribed to the subduction-associated conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref16">16</xref>] . High Th/Yb rates related via special rates for Th/Yb are compatible via continental arc magmas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Harker figures for major factors of the Chahar-Gonbad Granitoid complex</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x15.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The Chahar-Gonbad complex can be described as follows according to the evidence:</p><p>- A majority of the plutonic rocks are granites and granodiorites.</p><p>- Hydrothermal alterations have affected the intrusions.</p><p>- The study of the variation of the major elements shows that the samples of the three studied intrusions all formed in a similar setting.</p><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> (a) K<sub>2</sub>O Versus. SiO<sub>2</sub> plots via area; (b) AFM plot via are delineated after.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x17.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x16.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> (a)-(d). Rb vs. (Yb + Ta), Rb versus (Nb + Y), Rb versus (Ta + Yb), Ta versus V and Ta versus Yb plots of Pearce (1984).</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x19.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x18.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x21.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x20.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Th/Yb ratios vs. Th/Yb are compatible via continental arc magmas. (b) Ta/Hf ratios vs. Th/Hf Pearce (2008).</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x23.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig7_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1210661x22.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>- The granitic magmas show typical calc-alkaline trends.</p><p>- The intrusions are post orogenic granitoids and shown within plate granite features.</p><p>So, the Chahar-Gonbad Granitoid Complex is composed of some factors containing monzogranite, quartz diorite, and granodiorite. The geochemical properties, mineralogy, and petrography of these stones are relative to the standard I-kind stones. The Complex refers to metal luminous, a medium-K calk-sub alkaline range, and presents geochemical features standard of volcanic arc stones compared to an actual continental border. The geochemical records for the Chahar-Gonbad granitoid are a descent from a screen origin, and it can be recommended that the granitoid started by partial melting of mantle protoliths having various structures in a deforming operating border. The obtained results are compatible via the common pattern of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77336-ref17">17</xref>] that considered that the Sirjan-Sanandaj calc-alkaline magmatic arc made over a high angle subducting oceanic plate in the Neotethyan subduction region.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ansari, A., Zakariaii, S.J.S., Dargahi, S. and Arvin, M. (2017) Petrology and Geochemical Properties of the Granitoid Complex of Chahar-Gonbad, Southeast Iran. Open Journal of Geology, 7, 847-858. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2017.76058</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.77336-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caillat, C., Dehlavi, P. and Martel Jantin, B. (1978) Geologie de la region de Saveh (Iran). Contribution a l’etude du volcanism et du plutonismtertiaresde la zone de I Irancentral. These de doctorat de specialities.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chappell, B.W. and White, A.J.R. (1974) Two Contrasting Granite Types. Pacific Geology, 8, 173-174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chappell, B.W. and White, A.J.R. (1992) I and S-Type Granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 83, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263593300007720</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alavi, M. (1994) Tectonics of the Zagros Orogenic Belt of Iran: New Data and Interpretations. Tectonophysics, 229, 211-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)90030-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berberian, M. and King, G.C. (1981) Towards a Palaeogeography and Tectonics Evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18, 210-265. https://doi.org/10.1139/e81-019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Berberian, F. and Berberian, M. (1981) Tectono-Plutonic Episodes in Iran. In: Gupta, H.K. and Delany, F.M., Eds., Zagros Hindukosh, Himalaya Geodynamic Evolution. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1029/GD003p0005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chappell, B.W. (1999) Aluminium Saturation in I- and S-Type Granites and the Characterization of Fractionated Haplogranites. Lithos, 46, 535-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00086-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cotton, J. and Le Dez, A. (1995) Origin of Anomalous Rare Earth Element and Yitrium Enrichment in Subaerially Exposed Basalts: Evidence from France Polynesia. Chemical Geology, 119, 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)00102-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dargahi (2007) Post-Collisional Miocene Magmatism in the Sarcheshmeh-Shahrebabak Region NW of Kerman: Istopic Study, Petrogenetic Analysis and Geodynamic Pattern of Granitoid Intrusive and the Role of Adakitic Magmatism in Development of Copper Mineralization. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Shahid Bahonar of University Kerman, 310 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pearce, J.A. and Harris, N.B.W. (1984) Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks. Journal of Petrology, 25, 956-983. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/25.4.956</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pearce, J.A. (1983) Role of the Sub-Continental Lithosphere in Magma Genesis at Active Continental Margins. In: Hawkesworth, C.J. and Norry, M.J., Eds., Continental Basalts and Mantle Xenoliths, Shiva Publishing, Nantwich, 158-185.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pearce, J.A. (2008) Geochemical Fingerprinting of Oceanic Basalts with Applications to Ophiolite Classification and the Search for Archean Oceanic Crust. Lithos, 100, 14-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shahabpour, J. (2007) Island-Arc Affinity of the Central Iranian Volcanic Belt. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 30, 652-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Stocklin, J. (1981) A Brief Report on Geodynamics in Iran. In: Gupta, H.K. and Delany, F.M., Eds., Zagros, Hindu Kush, Himalaya Geodynamic Evolution, American Geophysical Union, Geodynamics Series, Vol. 3, 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1029/GD003p0070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ronald, F.B., Barnes, C.G., Collins, W.J., Arculus, R.J., Allis, D.J. and Frost, C.D. (2001) A Geochemical Classification for Granitic Rocks. Journal of Petrology, 42, 2033-2048. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/42.11.2033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Harris, N.B.W. and Pearce, J.A. (1986) Geochemical Characteristics of Collision-Zone Magmatism. In: Coward, M.P. and Ries, A.C., Eds., Collision Tectonics, Geological Society London, Special Publication, 19, 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1986.019.01.04</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77336-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irvine, T.N. and Baragar, W.R.A. (1971) A Guide to the Chemical Classification of the Common Volcanic Rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8, 523-548. https://doi.org/10.1139/e71-055</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>