<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2017.56016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-77238</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Analysis of Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Effluents from Beverage Industry in Ethiopia
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Birhanu</surname><given-names>Hayelom Abrha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yingjun</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>UN Environment-Tongji Institute of Environment for Sustainable Development, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>brema2015@yahoo.com(BHA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>182</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>March</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>25,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Beverage industries are one of the most polluting industries producing huge amount of wastewater effluents. These industries have been recognized to cause pollution by discharging effluent into receiving environment especially to the nearby rivers. The aim of this study is to determine the status of waste water effluent discharge of beverage industry in Ethiopia. Samples were collected from 8 beverage industries’ wastewater effluent discharge end pipe and examined for different physico-Chemical parameters such as: COD, BOD
  <sub>5</sub>, TSS, ammonia, total nitrogen, PH and phosphate. The observed values were ranged between 9 - 397.5 mg/L for TSS, 0.185 - 69.7 mg/l for phosphate, 0.265 - 71 mg/l for ammonia, 226 - 1975 mg/l for COD, 15 - 576 mg/L for BOD, 4 - 86.6 mg/l for total nitrogen and 5.21 - 12.37 for PH. The finding of the study revealed that most of the beverage industries were extremely high amount of total suspended solids (TSS), BOD and COD effluent discharge were found above the Ethiopian beverage industry effluent discharge limit value. Half of the sampled beverage industries’ effluent discharge of PH, total nitrogen, ammonia and phosphate were found within the limit value while the rest of the industries are still discharging their effluent above the national standard limit value. The continuous discharge of effluents into rivers without any additional treatment raises the level of pollution and toxicity, which have significantly adverse impact on the aquatic environment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Beverage</kwd><kwd> Wastewater</kwd><kwd> Effluent</kwd><kwd> Pollution</kwd><kwd> Physico-Chemical</kwd><kwd> Ethiopia</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Water pollution is serious problem globally involving the discharge of dissolved or suspended substances into groundwater, streams, rivers and oceans. A major source of pollution in developing countries is industrial activities and this has gradually increased the problem of waste disposal. Increased industrial activities have led to pollution stress on surface water both from industrial, agricultural and domestic sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref1">1</xref>] . The beverage industries were pin pointed as major consumers of water and became economic source in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref3">3</xref>] . Beer is about 95% water in composition; however, the amount of water used to produce a container of beer is far greater than the amount of water contained in the beer that is actually packaged and shipped out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref4">4</xref>] . The bottle washing causes most of the water consumption. Modern bottle-washers need 150 - 200 ml per bottle; where as an older one consumes up to 600 ml [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In addition to the water used in production, wastewater generation and disposal present another improvement opportunity for brewers. Most breweries discharge 70% of their incoming water as effluent. In most cases, brewery effluent disposal costs are much higher than water supply costs. In many communities, breweries may be the largest consumer of water and the largest source of organic effluent that must be treated by the municipal treatment plant. This presents unique supply and cost concerns. When combining that cost with treatment (physical and chemical) and effluent disposal costs, brewers are presented with a reflection of the true or full cost of water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref4">4</xref>] . The beverage industry brewing process generates large amounts of wastewater effluent and solid wastes that must be disposed of or treated in the least costly way to meet strict discharge regulations set by government entities. Brewery wastewater typically has a high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from all the organic components (sugars, soluble starch, ethanol, volatile fatty acids, etc). Brewery wastewater usually has temperatures ranging from 25˚C to 38˚C. The pH levels can range between 2 and 12 and are influenced by the amount and type of chemicals used in cleaning and sanitation (e.g., caustic soda, phosphoric acid, nitric acid, etc.). Nitrogen and phosphorus levels are mainly dependent on the raw material and the amount of yeast present in the effluent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref6">6</xref>] . However, the beverage industries action without any adequate treatment facilities have led to discharge of effluents into nearby rivers.</p><p>The wastewater generation and management in beverages industries become a serious threat to freshwater bodies, aquatic biota and human health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref7">7</xref>] . The continuous discharge of effluents into streams and rivers raises the level of trace and toxic metals, which have considerably adverse effect on fresh water bodies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref9">9</xref>] . In most developing countries particularly in Africa waste water discharge from beverage industry is high because the industries lacks adequate waste water treatment plants. This is the same situation in Ethiopia. According to AAEPA report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref10">10</xref>] there are more than 2500 industries in Addis Ababa city, 90 per cent of which lack onsite waste water treatment facilities. These industries discharge waste into nearby stream courses and open ditches and the Akaki River is heavily polluted. The estimated volume of wastewater discharged from industries into the rivers at around 4.8 million∙m<sup>3</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref11">11</xref>] . Therefore this study aims to determine the status of wastewater effluent discharge of beverage industry in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>Study area</p><p>The study was conducted in Addis Ababa city which is the capital city of Ethiopia. It is situated 9.02 latitude and 38.75 longitude and it is located at elevation 2405 meters above sea level. Addis Ababa is the economic, industrial powerhouse and political capital of the country as well as the seat of the African union (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). However, most of its rivers are polluted due to discharge of huge amount of wastewater from industry and municipal solid and liquid wastes. Beverage industries has a great contribution for the discharge of wastewater effluent to the nearby rivers. The polluted river water is used by downstream residents to grow vegetables, which are sold and consumed by inhabitants of the city. The city’s rivers are contaminated with different organic and inorganic pollutants. The shallow groundwater and springs are also contaminated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Method of data Analysis</p><p>Sample of the beverage industries effluent was taken on effluent discharge flow from the treatment plant. The physico-chemical parameters which were examined are the following: PH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen dissolved (BOD), Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>), total nitrogen, total suspended solids (TSS) and phosphate (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and their comparison to wastewater quality standard according to the Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value standard methods. The name of the selected factories for the analysis and their sample identification number are presented in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) and the method used for the analysis of the collected samples is also provided in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The national Beverage’s Effluent standards are attached in Appendix A.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result and Discussion</title><p>The laboratory results of investigation of beverage industries’ effluent for various physical and chemical parameter and comparison with the Ethiopian alcohol</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geographical location of the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x3.png"/></fig><p>standard effluent discharge limit value is presented in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and the graphical analysis were analyzed using MS excel data sheet.</p><p>PH and Total Suspended Solid (TSS)</p><p>The observed PH values in some of beverage industries in Addis Ababa city are shown in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The measured values indicated that the PH value of F8 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) was above the upper limit value of 9. In addition, among eight industries, the PH value of F4 (factory four) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> was below the lower limit of 6. In general the PH value of the two factories, out of 8 factories, surpassed the countries standard limit value. The observed ranges of the values</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Name of the alcohol beverage factories effluent collection and the identification no. of samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Collected Sample ID (Factory ID)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name of the Factories</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meskerm Liquo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Awash Wine</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BGI</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >National Alcohol Meken</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asnak Alcohols</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liyu Addis Alcohols</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mola Maru</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >National Alcohol Mexico</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> instruments or methods used for the determination of the parameters of effluents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >SI No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abbreviations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Method of Analysis</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >----</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PH Meter</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chemical Oxygen Demand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Titrimetric Method</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biological Oxygen Demand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Microbiological Titration Method</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Suspended Solid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravimetric Method</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Nitrogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colorimetric Method</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colorimetric Method</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molybdo-Vanadophosphoric Acid Method</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Results of effluent discharge values versus the standard limit value</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Name of the Beverage Industries</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Limit Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meskerm Liquor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Awash Wine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BGI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. Alcohol Meken</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asnak Alcohol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liyu Addis Alcohol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mola Maru</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. Alcohol Mixico</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.785</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 mg/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PO4<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.905</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 mg/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 mg/l</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Nitrogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 mg/l</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1200.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1975</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250 mg/l</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >576</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 mg/l</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>were found between 5.21 - 12.37 pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). PH of wastewater effluent discharge of the beverage industry is generally towards basic side. Extremes of pH of wastewater are generally not acceptable as excesses of pH cause difficulties to persistence of ecological life. Water with high or low pH is not appropriate for irrigation and other agricultural purposes. Although stricter limits are often set, greater tolerance is shown towards higher pH since carbon dioxide from the atmosphere or from biological processes in healthy surface water systems tends to lower pH levels very effectively to neutral conditions. If the surface water pH shifts too far either way from the pH range of 6.5 - 7.5, sensitive fish and plant life are susceptible to loss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>TSS: Total suspended solids is one of the prime concern effluent discharge for the beverage industries. The study results revealed that maximum concentration of suspended solid was observed in F2 (397.5 mg/l) and the lowest observed value of 9 mg/l in F7 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Except the two factories, the measured value of suspended solid in all other six beverage industries was above the standard limit value of 50 mg/l. The observed ranges of the values were between</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between effluent PH and Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between effluent TSS and Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x6.png"/></fig><p>9 - 397.5 mg/L (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Total suspended solids are the slice of solids that typically residues on the filter paper. Suspended solids encompass of silt, clay, fine particles of organic and inorganic matter, which is viewed as a type of pollution because water high in concentration of suspended solid may harmfully affect growth and reproduction rates of aquatic fauna and flora. Thus, it generates impact on osmoregulation of water and also lessens solubility of gasses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Reactive Phosphate, Total Nitrogen and Ammonia</p><p>Phosphate: the experimental result revealed that, among eight beverage industries, the maximum concentration of phosphors was observed in F3 (69.7 mg/l) and the lowest observed value of 0.185 mg/l was found in factory 6 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. Three factories were surpassed the available national standard limit value of 5 mg/l for phosphors. The observed values were ranged between 0.185 - 69.7 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Phosphors concentration of the other five industries was found within the limit value.</p><p>Total Nitrogen: The expermental result for total nitrogen indicated that except the two industries, the concentration of Nitrogen in others industries effluent were within (below) the standard 40 mg/l (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The maximum observed value 86.6 mg/l total nitrogen was found in F2 and the minimum 4 mg/l was in F1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. The experimental values were ranged between 4 - 86.6 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The high levels released by substances containing nitrogen over-stimulate plant growth. Water-based plants and algae grow too rapidly, whereupon waterways become clogged and flows are impaired. As the plants die, a disproportionately high amount of organic matter has to be broken down. If the load outstrips the natural supply of oxygen from the river, plants, fish and aerobic bacteria die and ultimately anaerobic conditions develop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Total Ammonia: The study’s investigation reveals the highest total ammonia concentration was found in the two industries that was extremely higher than the available national standard limit value of 20 mg/l <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The maximum concentration of ammonia was 71 mg/l and the minimum observed value was found 0.265 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The detected values were ranged between 0.265 - 71 mg/l <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. Discharging of effluent with excess amount of nitrogen, ammonia</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between effluent phosphate and Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between effluent total nitrogen and Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between effluent ammonia and Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x9.png"/></fig><p>and phosphors to the environment without any additional treatment is disaster. Excess of these chemicals create algal bloom in rivers and lakes that facilitate the depletion of age of the lakes. These wastes pose serious threat to associated environment including human health risks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref15">15</xref>] . The formation of eutrophication in water bodies is also because of these chemicals.</p><p>Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)</p><p>It’s obvious that the fineness of water quality, both COD and BOD5 were the determinant critical factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref16">16</xref>] . BOD and COD indicate the pollution of water by oxygen depletion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77238-ref17">17</xref>] . The study revealed that both COD and BOD levels of the beverage industries effluent were severely higher than the standard limit value. It is noted that comparison of the laboratory results was done with the effluent standards limit values of beverage industries and it indicated that all the measured values of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand) were above the standard of 250 mg/l, except one industry which was found within the limit value (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The Maximum COD value 1975 mg/l was found in F6 and the lowest value 226 mg/l was observed in F8 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The observed values were ranged between 226 - 1975 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Discharging of extremely high COD effluent to the water bodies may contain very high amounts of organic matter and it can cause whole diminution of dissolved oxygen leading to the mortality of aquatic organisms.</p><p>Like COD, BOD observed value of all except two beverage industries effluent discharge were extremely higher than the national standard limit value of 60 mg/l shown in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The highest BOD Value was found in F2 (576 mg/l) and the minimum observed value was found in F7 (15 mg/l) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. The observed ranges of the values were between 15 - 576 mg/l <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. Extremely high BOD effluents are well-known to deplete the oxygen content of a receiving water body which in return has adverse effect on aquatic species and aquatic chemistry.</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between effluent COD and Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between effluent BOD and Ethiopian beverage effluent discharge limit value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x11.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Beverage industries consume vast amount of water for processing their product. It is expected that due to the nature of the sector huge amount of waste water is released to the environment. Thus, this study is conducted on eight industries to analyze their physico-chemical parameters. This research illustrates that the sampled industries are releasing extremely high amount of effluent which contaminate the surrounding environment specially the nearby rivers. The BOD, COD and suspended solids are oxygen demanding components of organic matter. Most of the industries effluent is directly discharged into the nearby river and therefore the river dissolved oxygen is consumed by the pollutants released from the factories. As a result, the river water becomes contaminated and no longer support aquatic life since its oxygen content is depleted by the contaminants. To solve the problem in a sustainable way, these factories should have to apply secondary and tertiary treatment plants in good manner and follow the right procedures to treat the waste water by applying accurate amounts of chemicals, good maintenance, preparing good environmental management plan and continuous checking and evaluation before releasing their effluent to the nearby rivers.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Environment and Forest Ethiopia and the UN Environment―Tongji Institute of Environment for sustainable development staffs for their continuous support during this study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Abrha, B.H. and Chen, Y.J. (2017) Analysis of Physico-Che- mical Characteristics of Effluents from Beverage Industry in Ethiopia. Journal of Geo- science and Environment Protection, 5, 172- 182. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.56016</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Supporting Information</title><p>Appendix A. Ethiopian effluent discharge limit value for beverage industries (malting, brewing, distiling, production of wines and other alcoholic liquours industries).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77238-formula23"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-2170418x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Submit or recommend next manuscript to SCIRP and we will provide best service for you:</p><p>Accepting pre-submission inquiries through Email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.</p><p>A wide selection of journals (inclusive of 9 subjects, more than 200 journals)</p><p>Providing 24-hour high-quality service</p><p>User-friendly online submission system</p><p>Fair and swift peer-review system</p><p>Efficient typesetting and proofreading procedure</p><p>Display of the result of downloads and visits, as well as the number of cited articles</p><p>Maximum dissemination of your research work</p><p>Submit your manuscript at: http://papersubmission.scirp.org/</p><p>Or contact gep@scirp.org</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.77238-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ajayi, S.O. and Osibanjo, O. (1981) Pollution Studies on Nigeria Rivers, II. Water Quality of Some Nigeria Rivers. Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical, 2, 87-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fillaudeau, L., Blanpain-Avet, P. and Daufin, G. (2006) Water, Wastewater and Waste Management in Brewing Industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haroon, H., Waseem, A.A. and Mahmood, Q. (2013) Treatment and Reuse of Wastewater from Beverage Industry. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan, 35, 5-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brewers Association (2016) New Guidance on Wastewater Management Guidance Manual for Breweries.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Camperos, E.R., Nacheva, P.M. and Tapia, E.D. (2004) Waste Water Reclamation and Reuse IV. IWA Publishing, London, SW1H 0QS, UK.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goldammer, T. (2008) The Brewer’s Handbook: A Complete Book to Brewing Beer. 2nd Edition, Apex Publishers, Centreville, Virginia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hussain, R., Sattar, S., Khan, M.H. and Nafees, M. (2013) Low Cost Wastewater Treatment at Beverage Industry, Hattar Industrial Estate, Pakistan—A Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Protection, 3, 23-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Besselievre, E.B. (1976) The Treatment of Industrial Waste. McGraw-Hill Publisher, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nafees, M. (2010) Role of Kabul River in Socio-Economic Activities and Associated Environmental Problems. Central Asia Journal, No. 67, 101-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EPA (2005) Assessment of the Akaki River Pollution Status. Addis Ababa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C.S.A. (2007) The 2007 Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alemayehu, T., Legesse, D., Ayenew, T., Tadesse, Y., Waltenegus, N. and Mohammed, S. (2005) Hydrogeology, Water Quality and the Degree of Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bosnic, M., Buljan, J. and Daniels, R.P. (2000) Pollutants in Tannery Effluents. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azike, R.O. and Odisu, T.U. (2011) Monitoring of Some Flow-Stations in the Niger Delta States of Nigeria Effluent. Journal of Environmental Science and research management, 3, 231-243.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alao, O., Arojojoy, O., Ogunlaja, O. and Famuyiwa, A. (2010) Impact Assessment of Brewery Effluent on Water Quality in Majawe, Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. Researcher, 2, 21-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lokhande, R.S., Singare, P.U. and Pimple, D.S. (2011) Toxicity Study of Heavy Metals Pollutants in Waste Water Effluent Samples Collected from Taloja Industrial Estate of Mumbai, India. Resources and Environment, 1, 13-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77238-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gouafo, C. and Yerima, B.P.K. (2013) Evaluation and Mitigation of Industrial Wastewater Pollutants from Soap Factories and Breweries in the Bafoussam City Vicinity (Western Highlands of Cameroon). Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 5, 529-536.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>