<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Climate Change</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9495</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajcc.2017.62017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC-77020</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Dimethylsulfide and Coral Bleaching: Links to Solar Radiation, Low Level Cloud and the Regulation of Seawater Temperatures and Climate in the Great Barrier Reef
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>Jones</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mark</surname><given-names>Curran</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hilton</surname><given-names>Swan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elisabeth</surname><given-names>Deschaseaux</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Marine Ecology Research Centre, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Graham.Jones@scu.edu.au(GJ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>04</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>328</fpage><lpage>359</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>14,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>17,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  Coral reefs produce atmospheric dimethylsulfide (DMSa) which oxidises to non-sea-salt (nss) sulfate aerosols, precursors of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and low level cloud (LLC), reducing solar radiation and regulating sea surface temperatures (SSTs). Here we report measurements of solar radiation, SST, LLC, DMS flux, 
  <img src="Edit_ccc16ac7-c59b-4fbc-8077-38bcfc653ba8.bmp" alt="" />, and rainfall before, during and after a major coral bleaching event at Magnetic Island in the central Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Measurements are compared with those made at the nearby fringing reef of Or-pheus Island where coral bleaching did not occur. Extreme solar radiation levels occurred from November to late January and could have reflected cloud radiative effects that increased downwelling of solar radiation. High levels of LLC often coincided with high periodic fluxes of DMS from the unbleached coral reef at Orpheus Island (e.g. 14 - 20 μmol
  &#183;m
  <sup>-2</sup>
  &#183;d
  <sup>-1</sup>), in direct contrast to the very low fluxes of DMS that were emitted from the bleached, human-impacted Magnetic Island fringing reef (nd-0.8 μmol
  &#183;m
  <sup>-2</sup>
  &#183;d
  <sup>-1</sup>) when SSTs were &gt;30
  &#176;C. Continuous SSTs measurements at the Magnetic Island reef revealed various heating and cooling periods, interspersed with stable SSTs. Cooling periods (negative climate feedback) ranged from -1
  &#176;C to -3
  &#176;C (7 day mean -1.6
  &#176;C), and often seemed to occur during low tides, periodic pulses of DMS flux and LLC, keeping SSTs &lt; 30
  &#176;C. In contrast warming periods of +1
  &#176;C to +3
  &#176;C (positive climate feedback, 7 day mean +1.52
  &#176;C), seemed to occur during increasing tides, decreasing DMS flux and low to medium levels of LLC which increased solar radiation and caused SSTs over 30
  &#176;C and corals to bleach. Alternation between these two states or types of feedback is indicated in this research and may be a function of enhanced scattering of solar radiation from nss-sulfate aerosols that originate from oxidation of DMS
  <sub>a</sub> produced from the coral reefs in the GBR. The net radiative forcing from clouds can be as high as four times as large as the radiative forcing from a doubling of CO
  <sub>2</sub> levels in the atmosphere, which needs to be taken into account when ascribing coral bleaching events in the GBR solely to GHG warming. Further studies are needed to more critically assess the importance of this GBR coral reef-cloud feedback to the climate of northern Australia and the western Pacific, where the greatest biomass of coral reefs occurs.
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dimethylsulfide</kwd><kwd> Low Level Cloud</kwd><kwd> Climate Feedback</kwd><kwd> Coral Bleaching</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Reef-building corals contain high concentrations of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref6">6</xref>] that can be enzymatically converted to dimethylsulfide (DMS), a trace sulfur gas that oxidizes in the atmosphere to form nss-sulfate aerosol particles and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The growth</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The climate feedback involving production of DMS that can occur from coral reefs and adjacent ocean waters of the Great Barrier Reef. Oceanic phytoplankton and coral reefs produce seawater DMS which is transferred by air-sea transfer to the atmosphere where it oxidises to non-sea sulfate aerosol and methane sulfonate (MSA). The tiny sulfate aerosol particles grow to produce cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) forming low level cumulous and stratocumulous clouds, thus decreasing solar radiation levels, SSTs, and increasing rainfall. [Adapted from Charlson et al. 1987 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] and Jones and Gabric, 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref8">8</xref>] ]. Low tides and convective rainfall can increase the flux of DMS to the reef atmosphere, whilst wind speed over the ocean affects DMS transfer to the ocean atmosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x3.png"/></fig><p>of CCN can lead to the formation of low level cloud (LLC) such as cumulous and stratocumulus clouds, decreasing solar radiation and sea surface temperatures (SST), thus influencing climate as a negative climate feedback [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref11">11</xref>] . Atmospheric DMS can be oxidized to nss-sulfate aerosol by hydroxyl (OH) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub>) radicals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref12">12</xref>] , although O<sub>3</sub>, HO<sub>2</sub>, and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> can also be involved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref13">13</xref>] . The products of this oxidation produce SO<sub>2</sub>, methanesulfonate acid (MSA) and gas-phase sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) which can then condense onto aerosol particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref14">14</xref>] , or nucleate to form new sulfuric acid particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref15">15</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The climate impact of atmospheric DMS (DMS<sub>a</sub>) depends on the ability of its oxidation products to increase CCN, cloud droplet concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref13">13</xref>] , LLC and rainfall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>The CLAW hypothesis (named after Charlson, Lovelock, Andrea and Warren) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] states that because the albedo of low level clouds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), and thus the Earth’s radiation budget is sensitive to CCN number; biological regulation of the climate is possible through the effects of sea surface temperature (SST) and sunlight on phytoplankton population and DMS production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] . This climate regulation is also thought to occur over coral reefs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref20">20</xref>] . Variations in solar radiation can increase or decrease phytoplankton activity which in turn can increase or decrease seawater and atmospheric DMS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref21">21</xref>] . This may increase or decrease the albedo of LLC cover in the marine boundary layer (0 - 1000 m), which will decrease or increase SSTs, thus regulating climate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] . Charlson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] hypothesized that as temperatures increase from GHG warming, phytoplankton DMS production will increase, thus increasing CCN and cloud albedo, decreasing solar radiation and lowering SSTs, keeping global temperatures relatively constant; a negative climate feedback (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Such a cloud cover-SST feedback occurs in the NE Pacific [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref22">22</xref>] , and over coral reefs in the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref23">23</xref>] , but it is not known whether DMS is implicated in these feedbacks. An increasing amount of evidence now suggests that a LLC climate feedback involving enhanced production of DMS<sub>a</sub> and other aerosols from coral reefs could occur in the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref20">20</xref>] , and indeed over reefs in the western Pacific warm pool (WPWP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref25">25</xref>] . For example, air masses that travel over coral reefs in the southern GBR contain ammonium sulfate aerosols (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) derived mainly from the oxidation of DMS<sub>a</sub> which are likely produced from the GBRs coral reefs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] . Modini et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] have characterised these freshly formed aerosol particles that consist of 60% ammonium sulfate and 40% organic material. These measurements are the first direct observation of aerosol particle formation over the GBR, and compare with earlier observations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref27">27</xref>] . Mean aerosol particle concentrations averaged 3200 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup> and consisted of broad pulses of aerosol particles emitted in the morning and afternoon, with a small discrete aerosol burst at mid-day [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] , a distribution similar to that measured for DMS<sub>a</sub> over coral reefs in the central GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] . Periodic pulses of DMS<sub>a</sub> often occur over coral reefs during very low tides and rising tides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref30">30</xref>] . It is apparent that natural stress events (e.g. low tides, high SSTs, rainfall) cause the coral to utilize intracellular DMSP to cope with the resultant osmotic, solar radiation and temperature stresses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref33">33</xref>] , and in the process produce enhanced levels of seawater and atmospheric DMS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref34">34</xref>] .</p><p>These periodic pulses of DMS<sub>a</sub> at low tides may be capable of increasing LLC cover over coral reefs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), keeping SSTs &lt; 30˚C, thus decreasing the incidence of coral bleaching and significantly affecting regional climate in the GBR, western and central Pacific Ocean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref35">35</xref>] . However, the increased frequency of coral bleaching in the GBR in the last two decades could suggest that the strength of this feedback is decreasing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>This article discusses the potential of a “coral reef-DMS-cloud” feedback involving reef production of DMS<sub>a</sub> to constrain SSTs in the GBR, and could be the reason why coral reefs in the WPWP have not bleached so frequently over a period of 25 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref24">24</xref>] . In early January 1994 very high seawater temperatures (&gt;33˚C), coupled with high air temperatures (44.3˚C), associated with hot westerly winds, occurred at Nelly Bay reef, Magnetic Island off Townsville in the central GBR. Many colonies of corals at this location bleached to a pale colour and colonies of some species (mainly Acropora and Pocillopora) bleached to a bone-white colour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref41">41</xref>] . In contrast, no coral bleaching was recorded at Pioneer Bay, Orpheus Island 70 km to the north of Townsville, reflecting the lower SSTs at this study site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] . Prior, during and after the severe bleaching event at Nelly Bay seawater DMS and DMS fluxes were measured at both Pioneer Bay and Nelly Bay fringing coral reefs. The DMS database gathered during these bleaching events are unique in that it is the only DMS database we have before, during and after a coral bleaching event in the GBR. Given that DMS could have such an important role in the development of LLC cover over coral reefs, thus regulating SSTs, the aims of this paper are: 1) To highlight the changes in dissolved or seawater DMS<sub>w</sub>, dissolved NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and DMS flux, solar radiation and SST before, during and after the bleaching event. 2) To examine the changes in LLC cover with low tides and rainfall before, during and after the bleaching event. 3) To examine any correlations or links between LLC cover, solar radiation, SST, rainfall and the sulfur substances measured in order to throw more light on this possible coral reef climate feedback in the GBR. Whilst further studies are necessary on the physics and chemistry of sulfate aerosol, CCN and LLC formation over coral reefs in the GBR, the study described here provides more momentum for such studies to take place and may provide more insights into the frequency and intensity of this coral reef-climate feedback, as well as it’s sustainability in the face of GHG warming and increased coral bleaching.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Study Areas and Coral Bleaching</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Nelly Bay-Magnetic Island</title><p>Nelly Bay is one of the larger embayments on the eastern coast of Magnetic Island approximately 7 km from Townsville and faces SE into Cleveland Bay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The approximate size of the reef at Nelly Bay is 43 hectares. Within Nelly Bay the reef rises sharply from the general Cleveland Bay floor to form a wide</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Map of the study area showing locations of Nelly Bay fringing reef on the NE coast of Magnetic Island and the Pioneer Bay reef site at Orpheus Island north of Townsville</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x4.png"/></fig><p>reef flat that dries at lowest low tides (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The reef slope area contains areas of abundant coral cover mixed with other areas dominated by brown algae. The study site (146˚51'N, 19˚10.5'E) was approximately 700 m directly offshore. This site was chosen since it could be easily accessed from the shore, and contained many species of corals that contained high concentrations of DMSP, and so produced high concentrations of DMS<sub>w</sub> compared with phytoplankton production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref3">3</xref>] . Human impacts such as increased suspended sediments from dredging and enhanced nutrient levels from sewage discharge into Cleveland Bay affect this site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref43">43</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Pioneer Bay-Orpheus Island</title><p>Orpheus Island (lat. 18˚35'S, long. 146˚29'E) is ~70 km NE of Townsville on the east coast of Queensland (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). A major seasonal study was conducted at this site over 19 months, with 18 regular visits to the James Cook University marine research station at Pioneer Bay Reef between 7 December 1992 and 25 February 1994, and one further visit on 19 July 1994 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] . The DMS results of this study are summarised here in order to make comparisons with Nelly Bay reef, and because the two reefs together give a more accurate idea of the flux of DMS from coral reefs in the local area during the study period. The sampling location for the present study was at the edge of the fringing coral reef in the northern part of Pioneer Bay. The fringing reef flat is ~400 m wide and the sampling site was specifically chosen because both the flooding and ebbing tide travel parallel with the coast over a significant amount of reef before reaching the sampling point [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] . At this site, there was enough water above the reef that even at the lowest of tides, the reef was just covered, enabling water sampling at all tidal heights. The reef flat and slope at Pioneer Bay contain a diverse assemblage of corals, although the coral community is likely impoverished because of human impacts from the marine station.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Coral Bleaching</title><p>The 1994 coral bleaching event at Nelly Bay, Magnetic Island was first observed by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) on 16<sup>th</sup> January [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] . Underwater observations of the 1994 bleaching event at Nelly Bay from 28<sup>th</sup> January to 14<sup>th</sup> February have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref45">45</xref>] . Jones (1995) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] observed that the most pronounced bleaching occurred at this site in the arborescent and tabulate acroporids, the montiporids and the pocilloporids from 8<sup>th</sup> January. In some cases heavily bleached colonies were observed immediately adjacent to normal coloured colonies of the same species. In the heavily bleached branching coral species, there were usually slight tinges of yellow/brown colour on the undersides of the branches, especially those in the interior of the colonies. Preferential loss of colour on the upward facing surfaces of the corals repre- sented a frequent bleaching response and indicated an effect from increased levels of solar radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref46">46</xref>] . The first signs of recovery from the bleaching event were noted on a dive conducted on 24<sup>th</sup> February 1994 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] . Mottled or paler patches on partially bleached colonies appeared slightly browner and colonies readily regained their colouration in the 3 - 4 months after the bleaching event. By May 1994 few discoloured colonies could be observed at Nelly Bay, although pale yellow colonies of Pocillopora damicornis were observed as late in the year as July 1994 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref45">45</xref>] . Many colonies of P. damicornis lost in excess of 90% of their zooxanthellae, and bleached to a bone white colour. Six months after the bleaching event many colonies of P. damicornis were still bleached with zooxanthellae densities up to 10 times lower than unbleached colonies (1.22 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> compared to 2.67 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> cm<sup>−2</sup>). Changes in intracellular DMSP concentrations in this coral have been recently reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] . In contrast to Nelly Bay no bleaching of corals at Pioneer Bay was observed during our study period.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methods</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sea and Air Temperatures, Solar Radiation, Cloud Cover, Rainfall and Wind Speed</title><p>Continuous sea surface temperatures (SST) were measured at Geoffrey Bay (next bay to Nelly Bay), Magnetic Island by staff from AIMS which enabled heating and cooling periods to be expressed as degree heating week (DHW) or degree cooling weeks (DCW) over the November to March period. Average daily air temperatures, cloud cover and rainfall were recorded by the Townsville Bureau of Meteorology (TBM). Daily global solar radiation and low level cloud (LLC) cover was measured at Townsville airport, about 5 km from Nelly Bay by the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) and downloaded from the BoM website. LLC was the amount of the sky covered by cloud present in the marine boundary layer (MBL = upper 500 - 1000 m) and is an estimate of marine cumulous and stratocumulus cloud which DMS<sub>a</sub> is reputed to form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] . LLC measurements were made every 3 hours and averaged to give daily mean values. The daily global solar exposure is the total solar energy for a day falling on a horizontal surface. It is measured from midnight to midnight. The BoM’s computer radiation model uses visible images from geostationary meteorological satellites to estimate daily global solar exposures at ground level. At each location the image brightness is used to provide an estimate of the solar irradiance at the ground or sea surface. Essentially, the irradiance at the surface can be calculated from the irradiance at the top of the earth’s atmosphere, the amount absorbed in the atmosphere (dependent on the amount of water vapour present), the amount reflected from the surface (surface albedo) and the amount reflected from clouds (cloud albedo). These instantaneous irradiance values are integrated over the day to give daily solar exposure in MJ・m<sup>−2</sup> and are clearly a reflection of cloud cover, aerosol concentrations and water vapour in the atmosphere. Both LLC and solar radiation measurements whilst measured at Townsville airport are assumed to reflect conditions in the local geographical area.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. DMS<sub>w</sub>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and DMS Flux Measurements</title><p>Water samples from Nelly Bay, Magnetic Island were collected via a small boat about 700 m offshore and over the coral reef. The site was marked by a small buoy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref43">43</xref>] . Seawater was gently filtered using a 50 mL silanized glass syringe, with Teflon plunger, through a pre-rinsed 0.45 &#181;m cellulose acetate filter (Minisart, Sartorius). Water samples from Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay were collected and analysed for DMS<sub>w</sub> according to procedures already described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref46">46</xref>] . The flux of DMS from Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay fringing reefs was calculated using the method of Liss and Merlivat (1986) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref9">9</xref>] and calculated as reported in Curran and Jones (2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref47">47</xref>] . More continuous measurements of DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux at Nelly Bay reef were obtained by using the regression equations between DMS<sub>w</sub> and SSTs (DMS<sub>w</sub> = 0.5539 SST − 12.074; r<sup>2</sup> = 0.44, p &lt; 0.001), and DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux (DMS flux = 2.247 DMS<sub>w</sub> − 1.6945; r<sup>2</sup> = 0.67, p &lt; 0.01), enabling comparison with actual measurements. Calculated DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux values compared very favorably with values obtained from seawater DMS measurements and application of the transfer velocity equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref9">9</xref>] (in prepn.). Samples collected from Nelly Bay were analyzed for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by AIMS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref43">43</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Zooxanthellae Densities in Acropora formosa Coral</title><p>Zooxanthellae densities in A. formosa have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] . They are replotted here as a proxy of the stresses that affected corals at Nelly Bay and provide some insights on the influence of A. formosa on DMS in seawater given that coral zooxanthellae produce large amounts of DMS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref20">20</xref>] . Zooxanthellae densities in Pocillopera damicornis, which was still bleached at Nelly Bay in June 1994, have recently been reported, as well as intracellular levels of DMSP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>SPSS 11 was used for the statistical analysis of the data sets. For the seawater data, statistically significant differences between treatments were tested using a Pearson’s Product Linear Correlation analysis (parametric, normally distributed) with significance determined at the 0.01 to 0.001 level.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Solar Radiation and Air Temperatures</title><p>Periods of very high solar radiation levels occurred over 29 days (&gt;29 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>) in November (DOY 1-31), December (DOY 31-61) and early January (DOY 62- 72), with 9 consecutive days of extreme solar radiation levels from 27<sup>th</sup> November to 5<sup>th</sup> December (DOY 27-36) when values ranged from 29.2 to 30.9 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 30.3) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)). From 1<sup>st</sup> to 6<sup>th</sup> January (DOY 62-71) prior to the bleaching event on 8<sup>th</sup> January (DOY 69), extreme solar radiation levels ranged from 28.3 to 29.9 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 29.4). The mean solar radiation levels over Nelly Bay reef in January (mean = 26.7 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>), with the early January and late November to early December values, were higher than the mean January levels for the 1990-2012 period (24.7 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>), and higher than the highest monthly mean for all 22 years (28.4 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) (BoM online data). From 4-9<sup>th</sup> January (DOY 65-70), daily air temperatures averaged over 30˚C, and included a series of exceptionally high maximum daytime temperatures in excess of 36˚C recorded by the Townsville Bureau of Meteorology (TBM). On 7<sup>th</sup> January 1994, the maximum air temperature was 44.3˚C, the highest air temperature recorded at the time by the TBM since 1942 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] . From 19<sup>th</sup>-23<sup>rd</sup> January</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Solar radiation levels in MJ・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, (b) Mean daily low level cloud cover (oktas), versus day of year (DOY), (c) SST (˚C), lowest nightime tides (m), LLC (oktas) and rainfall (mm) recorded from November to April by the BoM at Townsville airport and Nelly Bay.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x8.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x9.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>(DOY 80-84), daily air temperatures also averaged over 30˚C, and included a series of unusually high minimum daily temperatures, including the second highest minimum air temperature (29˚C) recorded locally since 1942. Daily air temperatures then fell sharply from 29.3˚C on 24<sup>th</sup> January, to 24.8˚C on 31<sup>st</sup> January 1994 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Low Level Clouds, SST and Rainfall</title><p>Regular pulses of LLC cover occurred in November and December that lasted for about a week (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). From November-December mean daily LLC generally averaged 2 - 3 oktas with pulses often coinciding with low tides and rainfall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). These pulses of LLC coincided with relatively stable SSTs of 27.5˚C - 29.5˚C (mean 28.37˚C), except from 19-28<sup>th</sup> December when SSTs reached 30.3˚C. From the 2<sup>nd</sup> to 9<sup>th</sup> January (DOY 63-70) mean daily LLC cover markedly decreased (~1 okta) and coincided with the extreme solar radiation levels that caused corals to bleach white on their upper surfaces at Nelly Bay reef [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] with SSTs increasing to 32˚C - 34˚C which continued to 23<sup>rd</sup> January (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). From 10<sup>th</sup> January to 26<sup>th</sup> February (DOY 71-118) increasing pulses of LLC cover occurred (2 - 6 oktas) as the corals slowly recovered, and then remained low and relatively constant (daily mean ~2 - 3 oktas) up to 9<sup>th</sup> March (DOY 118-129). As LLC increased in February, and low tides increased in height from February-March, SSTs gradually decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). Stable SSTs often coincided with significant rainfall that occurred in November (monthly mean 102 mm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)), with lower, but more regular, and smaller amounts falling in December (monthly mean 44 mm), which often fell during low tides. On the 10<sup>th</sup> and 12<sup>th</sup> January 54 and 12 mm of rain occurred, with 70 mm falling on 31<sup>st</sup> January, yielding a monthly mean rainfall of 149 mm. In February very high rainfall occurred on 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> February (66, 25 mm), with smaller amounts occurring throughout the month, yielding a monthly mean of 212 mm. From 9-13<sup>th</sup> March (DOY 129-133) mean daily LLC cover rapidly decreased to zero and then rapidly increased to ~ 4.5 oktas over 9 days to 22<sup>nd</sup> March (DOY 142) when the mean daily LLC cover decreased gradually to about 1.5 oktas on 31<sup>st</sup> March (DOY 151) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). No rainfall occurred in March, and in April only 0.6 mm of rainfall was recorded on 28<sup>th</sup> April.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Variation in DMS<sub>w</sub>, DMS Flux, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and Coral Zooxanthellae</title><p>DMS<sub>w</sub> concentrations at Nelly Bay Reef ranged from nd-3.9 nM (mean 2.2 nM) with generally elevated concentrations (&gt;1 &#181;M) occurring from 6<sup>th</sup> November to the 3<sup>rd</sup> February, decreasing to very low concentrations (&lt;1 &#181;M) from 13<sup>th</sup> February to 2<sup>nd</sup> May (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)). During mid-February to early May DMS<sub>w</sub> concentrations were particularly low at Nelly Bay (nd-0.6 nM, mean = 0.2 nM) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)). DMS flux concentrations ranged from nd-4.8 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 1.64) with high values before the bleaching event (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)), and elevated flux levels after the bleaching event on 21<sup>st</sup> January, decreasing to nd-0.8 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> from 3<sup>rd</sup> February to 2<sup>nd</sup> May. A measure of DMS emitted from coral reefs in the wider local region was obtained by combining the DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux measurements from the fringing coral reef at Nelly Bay fringing reef (Magnetic Island) with those of Pioneer Bay (Orpheus Island) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). These measurements again highlight increasing pulses of DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux that occurred at these two reefs over the period November to the end of February. For example from 4<sup>th</sup> November-17<sup>th</sup> November DMS flux emitted from these two coral reefs ranged from 0.4 - 4.4 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean = 2.4). From 8<sup>th</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February much more DMS was emitted from Pioneer Bay reef than Nelly Bay reef with fluxes ranging from 0.4 - 14 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 4.1). On the 24<sup>th</sup> January the huge pulse of DMS<sub>a</sub> emitted from Pioneer Bay reef (14 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) occurred when significant rainfall occurred in the region (10 mm at Townsville airport on 23<sup>rd</sup> January) and low tides occurred at night (0.9 m) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)).</p><p>Similarly on 25<sup>th</sup> February an even higher flux of DMSa was emitted from the fringing reef at Pioneer Bay ranging from 19 - 20 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 19.5), when medium low tides occurred (0.8 m) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). These huge fluxes of DMS emitted from Pioneer Bay reef were in contrast to the very low fluxes of DMS that were emitted from 3<sup>rd </sup>February to 2<sup>nd</sup> May from the Nelly Bay fringing reef (nd-0.8 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) where coral bleaching occurred (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)), and calculated fluxes from 10th January to 23rd January (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). As the lowest nighttime tides decreased at both Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay reefs seawater</p><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) DMS<sub>w</sub> (nM), DMS flux (&#181;mol・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and lowest nightime tide (m) at Nelly Bay reef. (b) DMS<sub>w</sub> (nM), DMS flux (&#181;mol・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and lowest nightime tide (m) at Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay fringing reefs. (c) Seawater DMS<sub>w</sub> (nM) plotted against lowest nightime tide (m) for the two reef sites. (d) Calculated DMS<sub>w</sub> (nM) and DMS flux (&#181;mol・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) for Nelly Bay fringing reef. (e) Dissolved <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (&#181;M) at Nelly Bay fringing reef. (f) Zooxanthellae concentrations (zooxs polyp<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>) in green and seawater DMS<sub>W</sub> (nM) in blue for Nelly Bay reef.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x12.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x11.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x14.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x16.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x15.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>DMS<sub>w</sub> increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)), suggesting that DMS fluxes increase from reefs as more of the reefs are exposed at low tides. Ammonium concentrations in Nelly Bay from 6<sup>th</sup> November 1993 to 2<sup>nd</sup> May 1994 ranged from 0.03 - 1.83 &#181;M (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(e)), with elevated levels in early November, decreasing to very low levels in early to mid-December, and then a huge increase from the 8<sup>th</sup> January (1.83 &#181;M) during the coral bleaching period. Very high concentrations (&gt;1 &#181;M) occurred up to 31<sup>st</sup> March, with levels decreasing again to very low levels in April and May (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(e)). Zooxanthellae densities in Acropora formosa started to rapidly decrease on 8<sup>th</sup> January as this coral started to bleach, reaching lowest levels on 13<sup>th</sup> February [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). On 31<sup>st</sup> March as SSTs decreased to 27˚C at Nelly Bay, zooxanthellae densities reached 6.5 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> zooxanthellae per polyp, and then slowly increased their numbers, stabilizing at 10.5 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> zooxanthellae per polyp on 2<sup>nd</sup> May (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). These concentrations are still very low for this coral suggesting this coral had not completely recovered from the bleaching, and may even have been bleaching in November to December. At Pioneer Bay, Orpheus Island no bleaching of corals was reported.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Continuous SST Record</title><p>A continuous record of SSTs was recorded by AIMS at Geoffrey Bay (Magnetic Island) at 2.1 m depth on the reef flat. Several warming, cooling and stable periods of SSTs were evident over the November to March period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). For example, from 1<sup>st</sup>-9<sup>th</sup> November SSTs increased from 27.55˚C - 28.81˚C at a rate of 0.11˚C per day. SSTs then remained relatively stable from 9<sup>th</sup>-17<sup>th</sup> November</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> SST (˚C) for Magnetic Island reef flat seawater from November-April. Heating and cooling periods, together with stable SST periods are highlighted, with the thickness of the arrows indicating the magnitude of the cooling and warming</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x18.png"/></fig><p>(mean 28.61˚C &#177; 0.16˚C) until another warming period occurred from 17<sup>th</sup>-22<sup>nd</sup> November with a heating rate of 0.17˚C per day. From 22<sup>nd</sup>-25<sup>th</sup> November another stable SST period occurred (mean 29.49˚C &#177; 0.11˚C), followed by a cooling period from 25<sup>th</sup> November to 1<sup>st</sup> December when SSTs cooled from 29.52˚C to 27.31˚C at a rate of 0.28˚C per day. This was followed by yet another period of stable SSTs from 2<sup>nd</sup>-10<sup>th</sup> December (Mean 28.11˚C &#177; 0.38˚C). From 10<sup>th</sup>-14<sup>th</sup> December another cooling period occurred with SSTs decreasing from 28.32˚C to 27.2˚C at a cooling rate of 0.22˚C per day. From 15<sup>th</sup>-19<sup>th</sup> December SSTs were relatively stable at 27.54˚C &#177; 0.25˚C. From the 18<sup>th</sup> December to 27<sup>th</sup> December, a period of 10 days, SSTs increased from 27.37˚C to 30.32˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) increasing at a rate of ~0.30˚C per day. From 28<sup>th</sup> to 31<sup>st</sup> December a stable period of SSTs again occurred ranging from 28.02˚C - 29.40˚C (mean = 28.71˚C &#177; 0.6˚C). SSTs from 2<sup>nd</sup> to 9<sup>th</sup> January rapidly increased from 30.3˚C to 34˚C (mean 31.7˚C) at a rate of ~0.46˚C per day. From 10<sup>th</sup>-15<sup>th</sup> January SSTs cooled significantly (0.38˚C per day) to 30.71˚C on 15<sup>th</sup> January. Another stable but high SST period then occurred from 15<sup>th</sup> to 21<sup>st</sup> January, with SSTs stabilizing at 31.87˚C &#177; 0.25˚C (above the coral bleaching threshold), followed by a short, sharp warming period from 21<sup>st</sup>-23<sup>rd</sup> January when SSTs reached 31.95˚C (increasing at 0.22˚C per day). A sustained and rapid cooling period then occurred from 23<sup>rd</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February, decreasing to 27.75˚C at a rate of 0.20˚C per day (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). From 3<sup>rd</sup>-6<sup>th</sup> February SSTs rapidly increased at the highest warming rate of 0.39˚C per day, peaking at 29.56˚C on 6<sup>th</sup> February. This was followed by the longest stable period of SST s from 6<sup>th</sup> February to 23<sup>rd</sup> February (mean 29.30˚C &#177; 0.28˚C) when more regular pulses of LLC occurred (DOY 98-125; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)), and when significant amounts of rain fell over this period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)). From 24<sup>th</sup> February to 12<sup>th</sup> March a second warming period occurred at a much lower warming rate of 0.1˚C per day (28.72˚C - 30.46˚C), followed by decreasing SSTs from 12<sup>th</sup> March (30.26˚C) to 29<sup>th</sup> March (25.81˚C). SSTs then cooled to 24.9˚C on 4<sup>th</sup> May.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Low Level Clouds and Links to Low Tides and Rainfall</title><p>Mean daily LLC cover over Cleveland Bay reefs was compared with changes in the lowest nighttime and daytime tides (Figures 6(a)-(e)), and presence of rainfall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)), as these natural factors can release large amounts of DMS<sub>a</sub> from coral reefs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref29">29</xref>] . These large pulses of DMS<sub>a</sub> can potentially assist LLC formation (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Increasing pulses of LLC occurred from 1-25<sup>th</sup> November and often coincided with very low nighttime tides (−0.1 to 0.8 m) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a)), with 25 mm rain falling between 13<sup>th</sup>-17<sup>th</sup> November during some of the lowest nighttime tides of the month (−0.1 - 0.5 m) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). Pulses of LLC cover also occurred from 16<sup>th</sup>-21<sup>st</sup> November on rising tides of 0.2 m to 1 m (no rainfall), whilst from 23<sup>rd</sup>-26<sup>th</sup> November a large pulse of LLC occurred during low nighttime tides of 0.5 - 0.6 m and high rainfall (77 mm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). On 30<sup>th</sup> November high levels of LLC coincided with a low nighttime tide of 0.5 m and 4 mm of rainfall. The lowest daytime tides from November-February were always higher than the lowest nighttime tides with both low tides often coinciding with elevated LLC (Figures 6(a)-(e)). In December, tides were again very low, mostly at night. Pulses of LLC cover often coincided with decreasing lowest nighttime tides (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b)) and very high DMS fluxes of 6 - 8.6 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)), in the more continuous flux profile, and more regular rainfall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). Rainfall was not as high as in November but occurred intermittently throughout December and often occurred during periods of the lowest nighttime tides (−0.1 to 0.6 m; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). In the first week of January when corals bleached at Nelly Bay there was almost no LLC cover in the Townsville region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c)), whilst DMS fluxes were low ranging from 0.4 - 3.4 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) during medium low nighttime tides of ~1 m. From 9<sup>th</sup> January increasing pulses of LLC cover occurred over coral reefs in the Townsville region and again often occurred during periods of the lowest nighttime tides (0.3 and 0.4 m) and intense bursts of tropical rainfall on 10<sup>th</sup> January (54.4 mm) and 12<sup>th</sup> January (9.8 mm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). From 22<sup>nd</sup> to 30<sup>th</sup> January rainfall ranged from 0.2 mm to 10.4 mm with the highest rainfall occurring on a 1m low tide on 23<sup>rd</sup> January (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). On 31<sup>st</sup> January to 2<sup>nd</sup> February the highest levels of LLC cover occurred (3 - 5 oktas) during intense bursts of tropical rainfall and coincided with relatively high nighttime low tides (1 - 1.3 m) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). More regular pulses of LLC cover</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Mean low level cloud (LLC) in oktas and lowest daytime and nighttime tides (m) for the Townsville-Cleveland Bay region from November to March (a)-(e)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x19.png"/></fig><p>often occurred during low tides after 2<sup>nd</sup> February, and often coincided with rainfall bursts of &lt;10 mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)). Smaller differences in low tides occurred between the lowest nighttime tides and lowest daytime tides in February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)) and these prolonged periods of low tides and heavy rainfall (&gt;70 mm) may have caused the extremely large DMS fluxes (20 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) from Pioneer Bay on 25<sup>th</sup> February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). In March the lowest nighttime tides ranged from 0.6 - 0.8 m with pulses of LLC cover often coinciding with lowest tides from 1<sup>st</sup>-6<sup>th</sup> March (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(e)), whilst high LLC cover occurred in the third week of March during decreasing daytime and nighttime low tides (1.5 m - 0.5 m) (e.g. 18<sup>th</sup>-24<sup>th</sup> March). No rainfall occurred in March.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Alternating Warming and Cooling Periods</title><p>The heating and cooling periods of the Nelly Bay reef flat over the 5 month period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) were first calculated as changes in SST per day and then were scaled up to “Degree Heating Week” (DHW) or “Degree Cooling Week” (DCW) as coral ecologists often use a similar index to compare coral bleaching events around the world. We have done this so that we can compare each warming and cooling period over a standard amount of time (i.e. 7 days). For example, the first heating period from 1-9<sup>th</sup> November (DHW +0.77˚C) was followed by relatively stable SSTs from 9-17<sup>th</sup> November (28.61˚C &#177; 0.16˚C) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). This was followed by a heating period from 17-22<sup>nd</sup> November with a DHW of +1.19˚C followed by a SST stabilization period from 22-25<sup>th</sup> November of 29.49˚C &#177; 0.10˚C, followed by a significant cooling period from 25<sup>th</sup> November to 1<sup>st</sup> December with a DCW of −1.96˚C which surprisingly was equal to the sum of the two previous DHWs (i.e. +0.77 +1.19 = +1.96˚C). These SST heating and cooling periods in November (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) were generally accompanied by elevated levels of DMS<sub>w</sub>, DMS flux at Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)), elevated LLC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a)) and intermittent rainfall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)), during periods of low daytime and nighttime tides (0.26 - 0.83 m, mean 0.59 m) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a)). Over 9 days from 2-10<sup>th</sup> December (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) another SST stabilization period occurred (28.11˚C &#177; 0.38˚C). From 10-14<sup>th</sup> December another cooling period occurred with a DCW of −1.54˚C, which was again followed by a SST stabilization period from 15-19<sup>th</sup> December (27.54˚C &#177; 0.25˚C) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). From 19-28<sup>th</sup> December the second highest warming event occurred (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) giving a DHW of +2.31˚C, with SSTs at 30.3˚C, just over the thermal bleaching threshold of Acropora. This was followed by a SST stabilization period from 28-31<sup>st</sup> December when SSTs were ~28.7˚C. From 15<sup>th</sup>-31<sup>st</sup> December DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux gradually increased at Nelly Bay reef (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)) in the more continuous record, whilst LLC increased from 17-23<sup>rd</sup> and 28-31<sup>st</sup> December (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b)). These periods of enhanced DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux in December often occurred during the lowest nighttime tides (0.1 - 0.7 m; mean 0.52 m) and periods of high LLC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b)). From 2-9<sup>th</sup> January mean SSTs reached 31.7˚C with a DHW of +1.4˚C, followed by a short rapid cooling period from 10-15<sup>th</sup> January of</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> DCW (white) and DHW (red) in ˚C week<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and stable SSTs (green) (˚C) for Magnetic Island reef flat waters at 2.1 m depth for the summer period November to March</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x20.png"/></fig><p>−2.66˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). This was followed by high mean SSTs from 15-21<sup>st</sup> January of 31.9˚C and relatively high DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS fluxes from the reefs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)).</p><p>From 21-23<sup>rd</sup> January a short warming period occurred with a DHW of +1.54˚C coinciding with enhanced DMS fluxes from Pioneer Bay reef (14 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)), and increasing levels of LLC from 21<sup>st</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)). This was followed by a similar magnitude cooling period from 23<sup>rd</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February of −1.4˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). A short intense warming period from 3-6<sup>th</sup> February recorded the highest DHW of +2.73˚C when DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS fluxes were very low on 3<sup>rd</sup> February (0.7 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) and corals were still stressed as evidenced by low zooxanthellae counts in Acropora (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). From 6<sup>th</sup>-23<sup>rd</sup> February an exceptionally long period of stable SSTs of 29.3˚C &#177; 0.28˚C occurred (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), coinciding with regular pulses of LLC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)) and high DMS fluxes at Pioneer Bay reef (14 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) in late January, and on 25<sup>th</sup> February) (20 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)), and in the more continuous flux record (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). The Pioneer Bay reef did not experience bleaching since SSTs were &lt; 30˚C over the 19 month study, whilst at Nelly Bay reef in early to mid-February DMS flux was very low at ~0.4 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> and SSTs were exceptionally high 30˚C - 34˚C. A small warming period of +0.7˚C DHW occurred from 24 February-12<sup>th</sup> March, followed by a cooling period of −0.42˚C as the region exited the warm summer months.</p></sec><sec id="s4_7"><title>4.7. Regression Analysis</title><p>Solar radiation was significantly positively correlated with DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux (p &lt; 0.05) indicating that as solar radiation increases both DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux also increase (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). One of the most interesting findings in this work was</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Regression analysis and level of significance for Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Equation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Regression</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Significance</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub>-SR (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub> = 0.56 SR − 13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.73 (9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS Flux-SR (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS flux = 0.054 SR<sup>2</sup> − 2.29 SR + 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.72 (9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS Flux-SR (NB + PB)<sup>#</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS flux = −0.15 SR<sup>2</sup> + 1.9 SR + 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48 (13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub>-SST (PB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub> = 0.55 SST − 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.44 (76)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.001*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub>-SST (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub> = 0.9 SST − 23.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.83 (8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS Flux-SST (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS flux = −0.46 SST<sup>2</sup> + 26 SST − 373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.80 (19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.001*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS Flux-SST (NB)<sup>##</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS flux = 1.14 SST − 25.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.67 (13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub>-<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub> = −1.67 <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> + 3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.99 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.001*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-SST (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>= 0.19 SST − 4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.56 (12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub>-Zoox (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub> = 0.29 Zoox − 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.43 (12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &gt; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zoox-DMS Flux (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zoox. = 0.81 DMS Flux + 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.42 (12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &gt; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-Zoox (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>= −0.14 Zoox + 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.50 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub>-LNT (NB + PB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LNT = 0.016 DMS<sub>w</sub><sup>2</sup> − 0.22 DMS<sub>w</sub> + 1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.57 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS Flux-DMS<sub>w</sub> (NB + PB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS flux = 2.25 DMS<sub>w</sub> − 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.67 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.001*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub>-LLC (NB + PB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMS<sub>w</sub> = 0.34 LLC<sup>2</sup> + 2.28. LLC − 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.70 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.001*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SR-LLC (NB)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SR = −0.88 LLC<sup>2</sup> + 2.4 LLC + 26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r<sup>2</sup> = 0.38 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p &lt; 0.001*</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Units: DMS<sub>w</sub> = seawater DMS (nM). SR = Solar radiation (MJ・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>). DMS flux = &#181;mol・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>= &#181;mol. Zooxanthellae concentration = zooxanthellae polyp<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>. LLC = Low Level Cloud (oktas). LNT = Lowest night-time tide (m). NB = Nelly Bay. PB = Pioneer Bay. * = highly significant. # = Highest DMS flux values for PB omitted in correlation. ## = SST &lt; 30˚C.</p><p>the very significant positive correlation of DMS<sub>w</sub> with SST (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.44, p &lt; 0.001) for Pioneer Bay fringing reef (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). However, there was no significant correlation of DMS<sub>w</sub> and SSTs for Nelly Bay reef if we included SSTs &gt; 30˚C. However, when SSTs &gt; 30˚C are excluded there was a significant positive correlation between DMS<sub>w</sub> and SSTs for Nelly Bay reef (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.83, p &lt; 0.01). Interestingly almost the same linear regression equation was obtained for the DMS<sub>w</sub>- solar radiation correlation for Nelly Bay reef as the DMS<sub>w</sub>-SST correlation for Pioneer Bay reef (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). However, the DMS<sub>w</sub>-SST linear regression equation for Nelly Bay had a much greater slope by as much as 162%, compared with Pioneer Bay. It is interesting that the regression equation that correlates the lowest nighttime tide with DCW and DHW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)), although just short of significance at p &gt; 0.1, indicates that cooling of reef flat waters generally occurs during low nighttime tides that ranged from 0.5 - 0.9 m (mean 0.5 m). In contrast warming of reef flat waters generally occurred during tides that ranged from 0.7 - 1.4 m (mean 0.97 m) which seems the reverse of what you might expect. Also the regression equation that describes the significant (p &lt; 0.10) relationship between DMS flux and DCW and DHW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)) indicates that cooling of reef flat waters generally occurred at lower DMS fluxes that ranged from 0.1 - 7.48 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 4.8), whilst warming of reef flat waters generally occurred at slightly higher DMS fluxes that ranged from 4.4 - 7.8 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 6.4). DMS flux decreased linearly with DCW, although the correlation was not significant at p &gt; 0.10 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). DMS flux was very significantly (p &lt; 0.001) correlated with reef flat SSTs (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.80) for SSTs ranging</p><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Results for Nelly Bay fringing reef flat. (a) DHW and DCW plotted against the lowest nighttime tides (m). (b) DMS flux (&#181;mol・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) versus DCW/DHW (˚C week<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>). (c) DMS flux (&#181;mol・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) versus reef flat SSTs (˚C). (d) LLC versus DMS flux (&#181;mol・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x28.png"/></fig><p>from 27.5˚C to 33.3˚C, with the correlation described by a polynomial equation (n = 2) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)). As SSTs breached the coral bleaching threshold and reached maximum SSTs of 33.3˚C, DMS flux decreased to nd levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)). When SSTs &gt; 30˚C were omitted from the correlation DMS flux was significantly (p &lt; 0.01) linearly correlated with increases in SSTs from 27.5˚C to 29.68˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)). Seawater <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> was also significantly positively correlated with SSTs at Nelly Bay reef (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.56, p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). DMS<sub>w</sub> measured at Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay reefs was significantly positively correlated with the lowest nighttime tides (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.57, p &lt; 0.02) with the correlation predicting that as the lowest nighttime tide decreases, DMS<sub>w</sub> often increases. Also of interest was the highly significant positive correlation of DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux for Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.67, p &lt; 0.001) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Whilst the correlation between zooxanthellae counts in Acropora formosa and DMS flux was not quite significant (p &gt; 0.10), more data points may establish a statistically significant correlation. However, the correlation suggests that as zooxanthellae counts decrease in Acropora coral the flux of DMS from reefs decreases. There was also a significant correlation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with zooxanthellae counts (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.50, p &lt; 0.10), and an almost significant correlation between DMS<sub>w</sub> and zooxanthellae counts (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.43, p &gt; 0.10). Whilst the overall correlation between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and DMS<sub>w</sub> was not significant, when data points from the 13<sup>th</sup> February are not included (i.e. when Acropora reached it’s lowest zooxanthellae concentrations) the correlation was highly statistically significant (r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.99, p &lt; 0.001). Whilst more data points are needed the DMS<sub>w</sub>-LLC correlation is highly significant (p &lt; 0.001) and suggests that as DMS<sub>w</sub> in reef environments increases LLC cover also increases (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The correlation between DMS flux and LLC is also highly significant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(d)) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Different LLC-SST correlations occurred for different cooling and heating periods experienced at the Nelly Bay fringing reef. For example, for cooling periods not affected by coral bleaching (i.e. cooling periods 1, 2, 5), increasing levels of LLC from ~0.5 - 4.5 oktas were positively correlated with SSTs (p &lt; 0.001) when SSTs were &lt; 30˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(a)). However, for cooling periods after coral bleaching (i.e. cooling periods 3, 4), SSTs were negatively correlated with LLC (p &lt; 0.01) and indicated that SSTs could be extremely high (&gt;30˚C) at very low levels of LLC cover (i.e. 2 - 3 oktas) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(b)). The regression equation also indicated that this cooling took some time to reduce SSTs to &lt; 30˚C. For the heating periods (i.e. periods 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) that did not include the coral bleaching period 4 (i.e. 2-9<sup>th</sup> January), increasing LLC was significantly positively correlated with increased SSTs up to 33.5˚C (p &lt; 0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(c)). For heating periods that included the coral bleaching event (i.e. periods 1, 2, 3, 4, 7), but not period 5 (21-23<sup>rd</sup> January) and period 6 (the highest heating rate from the 3<sup>rd</sup>-6<sup>th</sup> February), decreasing levels of LLC were accompanied by increases in SSTs as you might expect (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(d)). Solar radiation levels were significantly correlated with LLC (p &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). However, although increasing LLC generally attenuated solar radiation there were clearly occasions when extreme</p><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> LLC (oktas) plotted against SSTs for different cooling (a, b) and heating periods (c, d) for Nelly Bay reef flat waters</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x32.png"/></fig><p>solar radiation (~29 - 30 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>) occurred at both low levels of LLC (&lt;2 oktas) and medium levels of LLC (3 - 4 oktas) (circled area, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>A detailed comparison of mean daily LLC with the lowest daytime and nighttime tides indicated that on many occasions high levels of LLC often occurred on days</p><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Mean daily solar radiation levels in MJ・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>・d<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> are plotted against LLC cover at Townsville airport for the November-April period. [Circled area = values of extreme solar radiation at low and medium LLC]</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x33.png"/></fig><p>with the lowest daytime and nighttime tides from November-February (Figures 6(a)-(d)), and often coincided with high sporadic pulses of DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS fluxes (Figures 4(a)-(d)). For example, from November-December high levels of LLC often occurred during low tides and high DMS flux (Figures 4(a)-(d), Figures 6(a)-(d)). However, in the first week of January when corals were bleaching at Nelly Bay low levels of LLC occurred (&lt;2 okta) when DMS fluxes from Pioneer Bay and Nelly Bay reefs were very low (0.4 - 1.4 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)), coinciding with high solar radiation levels and high SSTs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). From 9<sup>th</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February the flux of DMS emitted from the two reefs ranged from 0.2 - 14 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 5), with the highest flux emitted from the more pristine Pioneer Bay reef on 24<sup>th</sup> January (14 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) after significant rainfall in the region (10 mm at Townsville airport on 23<sup>rd</sup> January), and when a nighttime low tide of 0.9 m occurred (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c)).</p><p>From late January to early December mean daily LLC increased dramatically reaching levels as high as 5 - 6 oktas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)). Regular pulses of high LLC then occurred for the rest of February, often occurring during low tides and sporadic pulses of very high DMS flux at the Pioneer Bay reef (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). For example, on 25<sup>th</sup> February extremely high fluxes of DMS<sub>a</sub> were emitted from the fringing reef at Pioneer Bay ranging from 19 - 20 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup> (mean 19.5), when medium low tides again occurred (0.8 m) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). These huge fluxes of DMS emitted sporadically from Pioneer Bay reef were in contrast to the very low fluxes of DMS that were emitted from 13<sup>th</sup> February to 2<sup>nd</sup> May from the Nelly Bay fringing reef (nd-0.8 &#181;mol・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) where coral bleaching occurred and zooxanthellae counts in Acropora formosa reached their lowest concentrations on 13<sup>th</sup> February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). Whilst high levels of LLC in the summer can lower solar radiation levels and SSTs thus protecting coral reefs from the full effects of high solar radiation levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref24">24</xref>] optically thin LLC can also increase solar radiation levels in the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><p>For example, elevated LLC (&gt;4 oktas) can clearly attenuate solar radiation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0), but extreme solar radiation levels (~30 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>) occurred in the local region at both low (1 - 2 oktas) and medium (3 - 4 oktas) levels of LLC (see circled area in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0), suggesting a positive radiative effect from low and medium levels of LLC as reported for this region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref47">47</xref>] . From November to early January over a period of 29 days solar radiation levels were often extreme (&gt;29 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>). From 19<sup>th</sup>-28<sup>th</sup> December solar radiation levels often ranged from 29 - 30 MJ・m<sup>−2</sup>・d<sup>−1</sup>, contributing to the second highest DHW of +2.31˚C in Magnetic Island reef flat waters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), with SSTs ranging from 27.33˚C - 31.76˚C, strongly suggesting that coral bleaching could have occurred earlier than the first week of January. This suggestion is supported by the extremely low levels of zooxanthellae in Acropora formosa at Nelly Bay from 6<sup>th</sup> November to 16<sup>th</sup> December (1.2 - 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> zooxanthellae polyp<sup>−1</sup>), compared with zooxanthellae counts in recovering Pocillopera damicornis colonies of 2.67 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> at the same location in July [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] . Bleaching of A. formosa in early January further reduced zooxanthellae concentrations to 0.5 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> zooxanthellae polyp<sup>−1</sup> on 13<sup>th</sup> February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). The solar radiation levels over Nelly Bay reef in January were exceptional and bleached the upper surfaces of Acropora coral at Nelly Bay reef [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref46">46</xref>] . These high levels of solar radiation undoubtedly contributed to the very high SSTs of 30.5˚C - 33.3˚C at Nelly Bay in the first week of January [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] and most probably led to the corals bleaching more severely, with corals continuing to loose zooxanthellae right up to mid-February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(f)). However, directly after the bleaching from the 10<sup>th</sup>-15<sup>th</sup> January Magnetic Island surface waters cooled significantly with a DCW of −2.66˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), most probably aided by the high levels of LLC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c)), which periodically reached 4 - 6 oktas (mean of 3 hourly observations) and produced 64 mm of rainfall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). From 19<sup>th</sup>-23<sup>rd</sup> January, daily air temperatures included a series of unusually high minimum daily temperatures, including the second highest minimum air temperature (29˚C) recorded locally since 1942 at the time and which coincided with increasing levels of LLC during the nighttime (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] . Daily air temperatures then fell sharply from 29.3˚C on 24<sup>th</sup> January, to 24.8˚C on 31<sup>st</sup> January 1994, aided by very high levels of LLC from 21<sup>st</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)).</p><p>As solar radiation levels increased so did DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux and were significantly and directly correlated with each other (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), possibly reflecting increased photosynthesis of reef organisms that produce DMS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref49">49</xref>] , and/or effects of SST and tidal stress that releases DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS<sub>a</sub> from coral reefs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref33">33</xref>] . Production of coral mucus enriches reefs with extremely high DMS concentrations, particularly when stressed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref49">49</xref>] , and together with other volatile organic substances such as isoprene from corals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref50">50</xref>] can rapidly enhance the oxidation of DMS<sub>a</sub>. As solar radiation levels increased over coral reefs so did DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux and explains why there is such a good correlation of DMS<sub>w</sub> with increasing SST for Pioneer Bay reef (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). However, no such correlation occurred for Nelly Bay reef when SSTs &gt; 30˚C were included. When SSTs &gt; 30˚C were excluded a significant DMS-SST correlation was also observed for Nelly Bay reef (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>concentrations were also significantly positively correlated with increasing SSTs and significantly negatively correlated with DMS<sub>w</sub> (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) as previously reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref1">1</xref>] . The huge increase of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> concentrations from January to February often coincided with high sporadic fluxes of DMS from Nelly Bay and Pioneer Bay reefs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(e)) and could explain the high (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> concentrations (sulfate aerosol) that occur periodically in marine air masses over healthy coral reefs in the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] . This evidence strongly suggests there may be a link between DMS<sub>a</sub> emitted from coral reefs in the GBR, sulfate aerosol particles from oxidation of DMS<sub>a</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] , and the elevated levels of condensation nuclei (CN) measured over the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref51">51</xref>] which are precursors of CCN and LLC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The chemical composition of CCN is predominantly sulfate neutralized to varying degrees by ammonium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref52">52</xref>] . Once a cloud droplet is formed it will scavenge ammonia (Liss and Galloway, 1993 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref53">53</xref>] ). This production of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2360470x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is vital to the formation of sulfate aerosol since it charge balances the sulfate in the atmosphere (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Much of the light scattering properties of sulfate aerosol has a range of compositions from H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> to (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, which can enhance solar radiation levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] . The interaction of the sulfur and reduced nitrogen cycles in the atmosphere over the GBR can influence the productivity of the GBR. The more sulfate aerosols present in the atmosphere, the greater the rate of nitrogen deposition due to scavenging of ammonia by sulfuric acid. In this way sulfate aerosols can essentially act as a carrier of nutrient nitrogen into GBR waters which could be greater than land-inputs of nitrogen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref53">53</xref>] . Further studies are urgently needed to quantify this atmospheric nitrogen and sulfur input to the GBR [J. Ivey; PhD studies].</p><p>Continuous SSTs measurements for Magnetic Island reef flat waters revealed various heating and cooling periods, interspersed with stable SSTs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The most extreme heating occurred in late December and early February when solar radiation levels were extreme and LLC was high (Figures 3(a)-(c)). Most cooling periods (negative climate feedback) occurred during low tides (&lt;0.8 m) and decreasing DMS fluxes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)), whilst most heating periods were often associated with higher low tides (&gt;0.8 m) and elevated DMS fluxes, solar radiation and LLC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)). Alternation between these two states or types of feedback (cooling and warming) is indicated in this research (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). A cooling period (period 4 in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) of DCW −1.4˚C, associated with a low tide of 0.8 m coincided with high levels of LLC and rainfall of 163 mm during the 23<sup>rd</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)). The combination of low spring tides and rainfall on the aerially exposed reef flat could result in extremely high DMS fluxes from the two coral reefs and could explain the high levels of LLC over reefs in the region from 23<sup>rd</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February (Figures 6(c)-(d)), causing lowered SSTs. In our study the cooling and heating periods identified were significantly correlated with DMS fluxes from the two reefs (p &lt; 0.10) and suggest that as the flux of DMS from coral reefs increases cooling of reef flat waters occurs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)). This could reflect increases in reef-generated DMS<sub>a</sub> and oxidation to sulfate aerosol and CCN formation (Modini et al. 2009), leading to enhanced LLC and periodic rainfall (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Whilst detailed atmospheric measurements still need to be carried out over the GBR to more fully understand this climate feedback there is now more evidence that SST cooling by LLC does in fact occur in the wider GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref23">23</xref>] , thus implicating reef emissions of DMS<sub>a</sub>.</p><p>This cooling trend in the central GBR has been examined across all study summers and shelf positions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref23">23</xref>] . Leahy et al. found SSTs exhibited distinct drops during periods of high cloud cover, and conversely SST increases during periods of low cloud cover, with a 3-day temporal lag between a change in cloud cover and a subsequent change in SST. The relationship was strongest in both El Nino (2005) and La Nina (2008) study summers, at the inner-shelf position in those study summers, where the LLC cover tends to accumulate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref23">23</xref>] . Interestingly these authors found occasions when SSTs decreased by ~0.5˚C - 1.5˚C during cloud cover increases (January and March), and situations where SSTs increased (February), a situation we have found in our study.</p><p>In our study different LLC-SST correlations occurred for different cooling and heating periods. For cooling periods in late November, mid-December, and almost all of March (periods not affected by coral bleaching), increasing levels of LLC were significantly correlated (p &lt; 0.001) with decreases in SSTs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(a)). However, in mid-January very high SSTs ranging from 31˚C - 33˚C occurred in Magnetic Island reef flat seawater and coincided with very low levels of LLC cover (&lt;2.5 oktas) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)). For a cooling period from 23<sup>rd</sup> January to 3<sup>rd</sup> February, high levels of LLC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)) reduced SSTs to below 30˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), coinciding with enhanced DMS fluxes from Pioneer Bay reef within this period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). During almost all heating periods two correlations again occurred between LLC and SSTs. For example, for heating periods that did not include the coral bleaching event in the first week of January (i.e. periods 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(c)), increasing levels of LLC were accompanied by increases in SSTs. For heating periods 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 (which included the coral bleaching period 4 from 2-9<sup>th</sup> January) decreases in LLC were accompanied by increases in SSTs as one might expect (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(d)). It is thought that these contrasting effects on the LLC-SST correlation reflect the high solar radiation levels that can occur when LLC contains high concentrations of small diameter (nm) sulfate aerosol particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] , generated by the oxidation of DMS<sub>a</sub> produced from the reefs during low tides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref29">29</xref>] . These increases in DMS<sub>a</sub> have been observed as spikes or pulses, lasting from ~1 to 8.5 h, at Heron Island coral cay in the southern GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] . These researchers have also observed that when convective rain falls onto exposed coral reefs in the GBR at low tides even higher spikes of DMS<sub>a</sub> can occur over reefs, possibly caused by intracellular changes in DMSP in corals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] . It is thought that these natural stress events (low tides, high SSTs, rainfall) cause the coral to utilize intracellular DMSP to cope with the resultant osmotic, solar radiation and temperature stresses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref33">33</xref>] , and in the process produce enhanced levels of seawater and atmospheric DMS. Swan et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref50">50</xref>] have proposed that CCN produced from coral reef-derived DMS<sub>a</sub> oxidation products could contribute to cloud formation in the southern GBR as part of the convective internal boundary layer (CIBL) produced over Heron Reef [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref54">54</xref>] . These sporadic spikes of enhanced fluxes of DMS<sub>a</sub> occurred intermittently over the Heron Reef and were 2 to 30 times the DMS flux from the adjacent ocean surrounding the coral reef [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref55">55</xref>] . According to Swan et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] the island cay could assist the convective upward movement of DMS and its oxidation products via the CIBL to form localized convection clouds which may precipitate over the island and surrounding reef. Pro- cesses such as this could generate the proposed coral reef climate feedback described in this paper. Such a process would lower reef flat SSTs, which has been observed in this study at Magnetic Island.</p><p>In contrast, the high SSTs that accompany low or medium levels of LLC, could reflect increased scattering of solar radiation from a build-up of these small diameter sulfate aerosols in the marine boundary layer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref18">18</xref>] and could explain the presence of optically thin clouds that are often observed during coral bleaching in the GBR (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> in Elvidge et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref56">56</xref>] ). Changes in nss-sulfate aerosol number and LLC cloud amount could increase the long-wave and short-wave cloud radiative forcing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref57">57</xref>] over coral reefs in the GBR, as suggested by the good correlations between DMS<sub>w</sub> and DMS flux and solar radiation (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), and could exacerbate coral bleaching events from this increased scattering of solar radiation. The emission of aerosol particles from the 1,000 km length of reefs in the GBR has been calculated to be 10<sup>19</sup> particles s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, comparable with emissions from land surfaces and forest fires [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref51">51</xref>] . These aerosol particles over the GBR consist of 60% ammonium sulfate and 40% non-DMS volatile organics, oxidation products of DMS<sub>a</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] . The results of Modini et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref26">26</xref>] are the first direct observation of aerosol particle formation over the GBR with exceptionally high growth rates and very high aerosol particle concentrations. In light of our recent research these high aerosol concentrations could clearly reflect enhanced levels of DMS<sub>a</sub> emitted from coral reefs in the GBR during low tides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref29">29</xref>] . Oxidation of DMS<sub>a</sub> to sulfate aerosols then occurs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and these aerosols grow to form CN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref51">51</xref>] , precursors of CCN, potentially leading to increases in LLC cover which could increase net downwelling solar radiation and SSTs in the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref57">57</xref>] , causing cooling and warming of SSTs during the summer season.</p><p>An important parameter that governs the relative scattering and absorption of solar radiation and thus the net downwelling solar radiation is the single scattering albedo (SSA), which refers to the ratio of scattering to the sum of scattering and absorption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref59">59</xref>] . Aerosols have a net negative surface-cooling effect when SSA &lt; 0.95, and a net positive surface warming effect when SSA &gt; 0.95 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref60">60</xref>] . The net effect can change from a negative to larger positive forcing depending on the cloud fraction, surface albedo, and vertical aerosol concentration and cloud distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref59">59</xref>] . Aerosols, in particular sulfates (from the oxidation of DMS, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), larger than ~0.05 &#181;m provide the nuclei for most cloud droplets. Cloud droplets are the most important factor controlling the albedo of clouds and hence the temperature of our planet. Newly formed CN scatter radiation, but when they grow larger, acting as CCN (5 - 10 &#181;m), their scattering cross-section increases 10<sup>7</sup>. Under these conditions channeling effects occur where direct radiation is reflected by the clouds and solar UV radiation is enhanced. Such a situation has been observed in the Townsville region of the central GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref48">48</xref>] , in the wider GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref61">61</xref>] and during coral bleaching at Keppel Islands and Heron Island in the central and southern GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref56">56</xref>] , and could have accentuated the mass coral bleaching events in the GBR in 1998, 2002, and 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref40">40</xref>] . Low tides have a major and variable impact on emissions of DMS<sub>a</sub> from coral reefs in the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref55">55</xref>] with oxidation forming variable sulfate aerosol concentrations that would affect the net downwelling solar radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref54">54</xref>] . Under light winds and low tides in summer at the Heron Island reef flat, daily net downwelling shortwave solar radiation can exceed +800 W・m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>; with up to 95% of the net radiation during the morning heating the water column and benthic coral cover [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref54">54</xref>] . These extreme solar radiation levels caused heating of the reef which was exacerbated by a mid-afternoon low tide when the shallow reef water reached 34˚C and near-bottom temperatures 33˚C, exceeding the thermal tolerance of corals at Heron Island, causing coral bleaching [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref54">54</xref>] . Enhanced scattering of solar radiation from nss-sulfate aerosols derived from oxidation of DMS<sub>a</sub> produced from coral reefs, and associated cloud radiative effects, may have a bearing on the severity of coral bleaching events in the GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref63">63</xref>] and may reflect variation in the liquid water depth of the aerosols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref62">62</xref>] . This net radiative forcing from clouds can be as high as four times as large as the radiative forcing from a doubling of CO<sub>2</sub> levels in the atmosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref57">57</xref>] and needs to be taken into account when ascribing coral bleaching events in the GBR solely to GHG warming.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Our research has provided preliminary evidence suggesting that variations in the flux of DMS<sub>a</sub> from coral reefs in the GBR may enhance the scattering of solar radiation from nss-sulfate aerosols derived from oxidation of DMS<sub>a</sub>, which could be responsible for the extreme solar radiation and SSTs observed during mass coral bleaching events. Changes in the LLC-SST relationship for the Magnetic Island fringing coral reef could indicate that the cooling and warming effects observed at this reef in summer may be due to changes in cloud radiative effects in the solar UV and thermal IR affecting downwelling radiation to the coral reef. These cloud radiative effects, as suggested by the different LLC-SST correlations, may have a bearing on the increased frequency of mass coral bleaching events we are now seeing in the GBR as SSTs increase from global warming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77020-ref63">63</xref>] . Global warming in combination with cloud radiative effects from aerosols produced from the coral reef marine environment may partly explain the mass coral bleaching in February 2016 when one third of coral reefs in the northern GBR experienced severe bleaching decimating hundreds of coral reefs. Clearly more in-depth studies are needed in the GBR on this coral reef-climate feedback in order to critically assess the factors that affect cooling and warming of inshore GBR waters from aerosols produced from the coral reefs and how this may affect the climate of northern Australia and the western Pacific.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Thanks are extended to the staff of the Orpheus Island research station for their assistance and to Advan Muslim who collected samples from Nelly Bay reef. Dr Ray Berkelmans (AIMS) is thanked for providing the SST data from Magnetic Island. The completion of this research was assisted by a grant to Associate Professor Graham Jones by ARC Discovery Project grant (ARCDP) DP150101649 with Professor Zoran Ristovski of the Queensland Institute of Technology.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Jones, G., Curran, M., Swan, H. and Deschaseaux, E. (2017) Dimethylsulfide and Coral Bleaching: Links to Solar Radiation, Low Level Cloud and the Regulation of Seawater Temperatures and Climate in the Great Barrier Reef. Ame- rican Journal of Climate Change, 6, 328- 359. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2017.62017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.77020-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Jones, G.B., Curran, M.A.J. and Broadbent, A.D. (1994) Dimethylsulfide in the South Pacific. In: Bellwood, O., Choat, H. and Saxena, N., Eds., Recent Advances in Marine Science and Technology’94, Pacon International and James Cook University, 183-194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hill, R.W., Dacey, J.W.H. and Krupp, D.A. (1995) Dimethylsulphoniopropionate in Reef Corals. Bulletin Marine Science, 57, 489-494.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broadbent, A.D., Jones, G.B. and Jones, R.J. (2002) DMSP in Corals and Benthic Algae from the Great Barrier Reef. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science, 55, 547-555.  
https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2002.1021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Alstyne, K., Schupp, P. and Slattery, M. (2006) The Distribution of Dimethylsulphoniopropionate (DMSP) in Tropical Pacific Coral Reef Invertebrates. Coral Reefs, 25, 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-006-0114-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yost, D.M., Jones, R.J., Rowe, C.L. and Mitchelmore, C.L. (2012) Quantification of Total and Particulate Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) in Five Bermudian Coral Species across a Depth Gradient. Coral Reefs, 31, 561-570.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0870-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yost, D.M., Jones, R.J. and Mitchelmore, C.L. (2010) Alterations in Dimethylsulphoniopropionate (DMSP) Levels in the Coral Montastraea franksi in Response to Copper Exposure. Aquatic Toxicology, 98, 367-373.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Charlson, R.J., Lovelock, J.E., Andrea, M.O. and Warren, S.G. (1987) Oceanic Phytoplankton, Atmospheric Sulphur, Cloud Albedo and Climate. Nature, 326, 655.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/326655a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, G.B. and Gabric, A. (2006) Sulphur Aerosols Released from Melting Sea Ice May Influence Antarctic Climate. Australian Antarctic Magazine, 10, 28 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Liss, P.S. and Merlivat, L. (1986) Air-Sea Exchange Rates: Introduction and Synthesis. In: Buat-Menard, P., Ed., The Role of Air-Sea Exchange in Geochemical Cycling, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 113-127 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4738-2_5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swan, H.B., Jones, G.B., Deschaseaux, E.S.M. and Eyre, B.D. (2017) Coral Reef Origins of Atmospheric Dimethylsulfide at Heron Island, Southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Biogeosciences, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-229-2017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grandey, B.S. and Wang, C. (2015) Enhanced Sulphur Emissions Offset Global Warming and Impact Rainfall. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 13055.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koga, K. and Tanaka, H. (1999) Modelling the Methansulfonate to Non-Sea-Salt Sulfate Molar Ratio and Dimethylsulfide Oxidation in the Atmosphere. Journal Geophysical Research, 104, 13735-13747. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carslaw, K.S., Boucher, O., Spracklen, D.V., Mann, G.W., Rae, J.G.L., Woodward, S. and Kulmala, K. (2010) A Review of Natural Aerosol Interactions and Feedbacks within the Earth System. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 1701-1737.  
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pham, M., Boucher, O. and Hauglustaine, D. (2005) Changes in Atmospheric Sulphur Burdens and Concentrations and Resulting Radiative Forcings under IPCC SRES Emission Scenarios for 1990-2100. Journal Geophysical Research, 110, DO 6112. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005125</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A and Pirjola, L. (1998) Parameterisation for Sulphuric Acid/Water Nucleation Rates. Journal Geophysical Research, 103, 8301-8307.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03718</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Z., Niu, F., Fan, J., Liu, Y., Rosenfeld, D. and Ding, Y. (2011) Long-Term Impacts of Aerosols on the Vertical Development of Clouds and Precipitation. Nature Geoscience, 4, 888-894. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koren, I., Altaratz, O., Remer, L.A., Feingold, G., Vanderlei Martins, J. and Heiblum, R.H. (2012) Aerosol-Induced Intensification of Rain from the Tropics to the Mid-Latitudes. Nature Geoscience, 5, 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1364</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Jones, G.B. (2015) Chapter 3: The Reef Sulphur Cycle: Influence on Climate and Ecosystem Services. In: Narchi, N.E. and Price, L.L., Eds., Ethnobiology of Coral and Coral Reefs, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 27-57 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23763-3_3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deschaseaux, E.S.M., Jones, G.B. and Swan, H.B. (2015) Dimethylated Sulfur Compounds in Coral-Reef Ecosystems. Environmental Chemistry, 13, 239-251.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fischer, E. and Jones, G.B. (2012) Atmospheric Dimethylsulfide Production from Corals in the Great Barrier Reef and Links to Solar Radiation, Climate and Coral Bleaching. Biogeochemistry, 110, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9719-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vallina, S.M. and Simo, R. (2007) Strong Relationship between DMS and the Solar Radiation Dose over the Global Surface Ocean. Science, 315, 506-508.  
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clement, A.C., Burgman, R. and Norris, J.R. (2009) Observational and Model Evidence for Positive Low-Level Cloud Feedback. Science, 325, 460-464.  
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leahy, S.M., Kingsford, M.J. and Steinberg, C.R. (2013) Do Clouds Save the Great Barrier Reef? Satellite Imagery Elucidates the Cloud-SST Relationship at the Local Scale. PLoS ONE, 8, e70400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070400</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kleypas, J.O., Danabasoglu, G. and Lough, J.M. (2008) Potential Role of the Ocean Thermostat in Determining Regional Differences in Coral Bleaching Events. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L03613. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl032257</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takahashi, Y., Okazaki, Y., Sato, M., Miyahara, H., Sakanoi, K., Hong, P.K. and Hoshino, N. (2010) 27 Day Variation in Cloud Amount in the Western Pacific Warm Pool Region and Relationship to the Solar Cycle. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 1557-1584. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1577-2010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Modini, R.L., Ristovski, Z.D., Johnson, G.R., He, C., Surawski, N., Morawska, L., Suni, T. and Kulmala, M. (2009) New Particle Formation and Growth at a Remote, Sub-Tropical Coastal Location. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 9, 12101-12139. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-9-12101-2009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leck, C. and Bigg, E.K. (2008) Comparison of Sources and Nature of the Tropical Aerosol with the Summer High Arctic Aerosol. Tellus, 60, 118-126.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00315.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, G.B., Curran, M.A.J., Broadbent, A.D., King, S., Fischer, E. and Jones, R. (2007) Factors Affecting the Cycling of Dimethylsulfide and Dimethylsulphonio-Propionate in Coral Reef Waters of the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Chemistry, 4, 310-322.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, G.B. and Trevena, A.J. (2005) The Influence of Coral Reefs on Atmospheric Dimethylsulfide over the Great Barrier Reef, Coral Sea, Gulf of Papua and Solomon and Bismarck Seas. Marine and Freshwater Research, 56, 85-93.  
https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04097</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hopkins, F.E., Bell, T.G., Yang, M., Suggett, D.J. and Steinke, M. (2016) Air Exposure of Coral Is a Significant Source of Dimethylsulfide (DMS) to the Atmosphere. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 36031.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, G.B., Fischer, E., Deschaseaux, E.S.M. and Harrison, P.L. (2014) The Effect of Coral Bleaching on the Cellular Concentration of Dimethylsulphoniopropionate in Reef Corals. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 460, 19-31.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2014.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, G.B. and King, S. (2015) Dimethylsulphoniopropionate (DMSP) as an Indicator of Bleaching Tolerance in Scleractinian Corals. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 3, 444-465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse3020444</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deschaseaux, E.S.M., Jones, G.B., Deseo, M.A., Shepherd, K.M., Kiene, R.P., Swan, H.B., Harrison, P.L. and Eyre, B.D. (2014) Effects of Environmental Factors on Dimethylated Sulfur Compounds and Their Potential Role in the Antioxidant System of the Coral Holobiont. Limnology and Oceanography, 59, 758-768.  
https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.3.0758</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broadbent, A.D. and Jones, G.B. (2004) DMS and DMSP in Mucus Ropes, Coral Mucus, Surface Films and Sediment Pore Waters from Coral Reefs in the Great Barrier Reef. Marine and Freshwater Research, 55, 849-855.  
https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mumby, P.J., Chisholm, J.R.M., Edwards, A.J., Andrefouet, S. and Jaubert, J. (2011) Cloudy Weather May Have Saved Society Island Reef Corals during the 1998 ENSO Event. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 222, 209-216.  
https://doi.org/10.3354/meps222209</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oliver</surname><given-names> J.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1985</year>)<article-title>Recurrent Seasonal Bleaching and Mortality of Corals on the Great Barrier Reef</article-title><source> Proceedings of 5th International Coral Reef Congress</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 77</fpage>-<lpage>95</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berkelmans, R. and Oliver, J.K. (1999) Large Scale Bleaching of Corals on the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs, 18, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380050154</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (1999) Climate Change, Coral Bleaching and the Future of the World’s Coral Reefs. Marine and Freshwater Research, 50, 217-224.  
https://doi.org/10.1071/MF99078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berkelmans, R. and van Oppen, M.J. (2006) The Role of Zooxanthellae in the Thermal Tolerance of Corals: A “Nugget of Hope” for Coral Reefs in an Era of Climate Change. Proceedings Royal Society, Series B, Biological Sciences, 1599, 2305-2312. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3567</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berkelmans, R., De’ath, G., Kinninmonth, S. and Skirving, W.J.A. (2004) Comparison of the 1998 and 2002 Coral Bleaching Events on the Great Barrier Reef: Spatial Correlation, Patterns and Predictions. Coral Reefs, 23, 74-83.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0353-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, R.J., Berkelmans, R. and Olive, J.K. (1997) Recurrent Bleaching of Corals at Magnetic Island (Australia) Relative to Air and Seawater Temperature. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 158, 289-292. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps158289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reichelt, A. and Jones, G.B. (1994) Trace Metals as Tracers of Dredging Activity in Cleveland Bay: Field and Laboratory Studies. Australian Journal Marine and Freshwater Research, 48, 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf9941237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muslim, I. and Jones, G.B. (2003) The Seasonal Variation of Dissolved Nutrients, Chlorophyll a and Suspended Sediments at Nelly Bay, Magnetic Island. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science, 57, 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00373-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, R.J. (1995) Sub-Lethal Stress Assessment in Scleractinia and the Regulatory Biology of the Coral-Algal Symbiosis. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broadbent, A.D. (1997) Dimethylsulfide (DMS) in the Great Barrier Reef: An Assessment of the Factors Regulating Its Production in Reef Waters. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Curran, M.A.J. (1996) The Spatial and Seasonal Distribution of Dimethylsulfide and Dimethylsulphonio-Propionate in the Great Barrier Reef, North Tasman Sea, and Southern Ocean Regions. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Curran, M.A.J. and Jones, G.B. (2000) Dimethylsulfide in the Southern Ocean: Seasonality and Flux. Journal Geophysical Research, 105, 20451-20459.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900176</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barton, I.J. and Paltridge, G.W. (1979) The Australian Climatology of Biologically Effective Ultraviolet Irradiation. Australian Journal of Dermatology, 20, 68.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.1979.tb00165.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broadbent, A.D. and Jones, G.B. (2006) Seasonal and Diurnal Cycles of Dimethylsulfide, Dimethylsulphoniopropionate and Dimethylsulphoxide at One Tree Reef Lagoon. Environmental Chemistry, 3, 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN06011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swan, H.B., Crough, R.W., Vaattovaara, P., Jones, G.B., Deschaseaux, E.S.M., Eyre, B.D., Miljevic, B. and Ristovski, Z.D. (2016) Dimethyl Sulfide and Other Biogenic Organic Compound Emissions from Branching Coral and Reef Seawater: Potential Sources of Secondary Aerosol over the Great Barrier Reef. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 73, 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-016-9327-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bigg, E.K. and Turvey, D.E. (1978) Sources of Atmospheric Particles over Australia. Atmospheric Environment, 12, 1643.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90313-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pruppacher, H.R. and Klett, J.D. (1978) Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 714 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9905-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liss, P.S. and Galloway, J.N. (1993) Air-Sea Exchange of Sulphur and Nitrogen and Their Interaction in the Marine Atmosphere. Interactions of C, N, P, S Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change, Springer, Berlin, 259-281.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76064-8_11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MacKellar, M.C., McGowan, H.A., Phinn, S.R. and Soderholm, J.S. (2013) Observations of the Surface Energy Fluxes and Boundary-Layer Structure over Heron Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 146, 319-340.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9767-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swan, H., Jones, G. and Deschaseaux, E. (2012) Dimethylsulfide, Climate and Coral Reef Ecosystems. Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 9-13 July.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elvidge, C.D., Dietz, J.B., Berkelmans, R., Andrefouet, S., Skirving, W., Strong, A. and Tuttle, B.T. (2004) Satellite Observation of Keppel Islands (Great Barrier Reef) 2002 Coral Bleaching Using IKONAS Data. Coral Reefs, 23, 123-132.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-003-0364-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramanathan, V., Cess, R.D., Harrison, E.F., Minnis, P., Barkstrom, B.R., Ahmad, E. and Hartmann, D. (1989) Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. Science, 243, 57-63.  
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.243.4887.57</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramanathan, V. and Collins, W. (1991) Thermodynamic Regulation of Ocean Warming by Cirrus Clouds Deduced from Observations of the 1987 El Nino. Nature, 351, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/351027a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P.J., Kiehl, J.T. and Rosenfeld, D. (2001) Aerosols, Climate and the Hydrological Cycle. Science, 294, 2119-2124.  
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Satheesh, S.K. and Ramanathan, V. (2000) Larger Differences in Tropical Aerosol Forcing at the Top of the Atmosphere and the Earth’s Surface. Nature, 405, 60-63.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/35011039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masiri, I., Nunez, M. and Weller, E. (2008) A Ten-Year Climatology of Solar Radiation for the Great Barrier Reef: Implications for Recent Mass Coral Bleaching Events. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 4443-4462.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160801930255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bennartz, R., Shupe, M.D., Turner, D.D., Walden, V.P., Steffen, K., Cox, C.J.M.S., Kulie, M.S., Mille, N.B. and Pettersen, C. (2013) July 2012 Greenland Melt Extent Enhanced by Low-Level Liquid Clouds. Nature, 496, 83-86.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77020-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anthony, K.R.N. and Kerswell, A.P. (2007) Coral Mortality Following Extreme Low Tides and High Solar Irradience. Marine Biology, 151, 1623-1631.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0573-0</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>