<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2017.97054</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-76981</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Effect of Preparation Conditions on the Removal Efficiency of Water Pollutants Using LTA Zeolite
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>Hamdy Abd El Maksod</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samia</surname><given-names>Kosa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eman</surname><given-names>Z. Hegazy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Physical Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ehegazy77@yahoo.com(EZH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>811</fpage><lpage>821</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>13,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this study LTA zeolite was prepared from kaolin. The effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the crystal structure and ability to ion exchange of some heavy metals were studied. Many techniques were used to characterize the prepared zeolite includes X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) with crystal lattice analysis, Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and finally ion exchange isotherm of some heavy metal ions. The results showed that the ultrasonicated zeolite exhibits different behavior towards ion exchange with increasing its capacity. The ultrasonicated zeolite showed little increase in the lattice parameters with increasing in the crystal size. Fitting adsorption isotherms on the metal adsorbed showed an observable change in the behavior of ultrasonicated zeolite towards the metals exchanged.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Zeolite</kwd><kwd> XRD</kwd><kwd> Lattice Parameters</kwd><kwd> Ultra Sonication</kwd><kwd> Ion Exchange</kwd><kwd> Silica</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The preparation of zeolites from clays and raw materials was a subject of many researches in the past decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref4">4</xref>] . The zeolites were considered to be three dimensional alumino silicate structures consists of tetrahedral of TO<sub>4</sub> (T, Si or Al). The resulting combination of these tetrahedra resulted in excess negative charge which balanced by a mobile cation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref5">5</xref>] . These distinct proprieties of zeolite enable it form perfect performance in ion exchange. In addition to that, the three dimensional arrangements inside the zeolite structure add a variety of porous structures within the range of micropores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref7">7</xref>] . Many synthetic zeolites require what is called template, acts as a directing agent to the required pores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref9">9</xref>] . Most of these templates are organic compounds; however water could also be considered as a template for some kinds of zeolites like LTA, FAU, ANA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref12">12</xref>] . Many syntheses today include the ultrasonic as a helping and new parameters in preparation of many inorganic and organic compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref17">17</xref>] . The effect of ultrasonic in such preparation is subject of many studies in that area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref16">16</xref>] . Our systems include the preparation of LTA for white Saudi silica. To our knowledge this is the first time to study the effect of ultrasonic in such system. We aim to shed some light on the effect of ultrasonic on the crystal structure and its effect on ion exchange behavior towards some heavy metals.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials Used</title><p>Saudi Arabia white silica is utilized for additional source of silica, Sodium hydroxide (Merck), copper nitrate (Merck), nickel Nitrate (Merck), Lead (II) Nitrate (Merck). Local kaolin.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Synthesis</title><p>Synthesis of materials was carried out by first hydrothermal treatment of white silica with sodium hydroxide for 24 hours at 150˚C under autogenous pressure.</p><p>The role of silica solution is to absorb the ultrasonic irradiation by increasing the viscosity of the gel synthesizing mixture.</p><p>After that a gel mixture was prepared from kaolin and silicate solution prepared from the previous step and hydrothermally treated at 95˚C for 5 hours (0 time of ultrasonic irradiation). This step is repeated but the gel mixture is subjected first to ultrasonic irradiation for different time intervals at 70˚C at power of 430 W, then complete the time of 5 hours in normal hydrothermal treatment.</p><p>The composition of the mixture is adjusted to prepare LTA zeolite</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Characterization Techniques</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Adsorption Experiment</title><p>A 0.5 g of zeolite sample is mixed with 100 ml of solutions of Cu<sup>2+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup> and Pb<sup>2+</sup> with diverse concentrations. Continuous stirring at room temperature for 1 hour is utilized.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD)</title><p>X-Ray diffractograms of different solids are collected using a Bruker D8 advance instrument with CuKα1 target with secondly monochromator 40 kV, 40 mA. Crystal lattice and space group analysis are done using PhilpsX’Pert Plus V. 1.0 23.04. 1999.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX) Analysis</title><p>Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of different solids and EDX data is collected using instrument “JXA-840 an Electron probe Micro Analyzer-Japan”.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR)</title><p>The EPR spectra are measured on EMX Bruker instrument operated at X-band frequency. The following conditions are global to all solids unless specified in the manuscript. Microwave frequency: 9.79 GHz. Receiver gain: 60. Sweep width: 6000 center at 3480 Gs. Microwave power: 0.202637 W.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. Elemental Analysis</title><p>Elemental analysis is measured by the use of ICP (Inductively Coupled Plasma) Optical emission Spectrometer, Model Optima 4100 DV, Perkin Elmer, U.S.A.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD)</title><p>The XRD analysis showed that the diffraction pattern of ultrasonic irradiated and non-irradiated samples of zeolites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) showed a very well crystalline form of pure phase of LTA zeolite. The crystal lattice analysis of all samples (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) showed a small difference in lattice parameters. The little increase in lattice parameters of ultrasonic irradiated sample suggests that the crystal size is</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of ultrasonic irradiation time on the XRD patterns of LTA zeolite</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x2.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Lattice parameters of zeolite samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lattice parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >b</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >c</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >α</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >β</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >γ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Space group</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Duration of ultrasonic irradiation, min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pm-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pm-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pm-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pm-3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pm-3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>increasing slightly by increasing the time of irradiation. This slight increase will be a subject of investigation on ion exchange behavior.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX) Analysis</title><p>SEM images of 60 min ultrasonic irradiated sample and non-irradiated one are given in (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). These images showed a very famous cubic structure of LTA zeolites. The image analysis of these images showed that the crystal diameter of irradiated sample has a value of 1.08 μm which is little increase than that of non-irradiated sample which has a value of 0.99 μm. This indicates that the ultrasonic irradiation during the preparation process enhances that crystallization and growth process as confirmed before from the XRD patterns.</p><p>The EDX elemental analysis showed that the atomic ratio of Si/Al at the surface for irradiated sample is 1.15 which is less than that of non-irradiated sample (1.2). This means that the Al in irradiated sample is much concentrated to the surface. Hence the presence of Al in tetrahedron of any zeolite structure is responsible for the existence of excess negative charge and consequently of labile cation, then it is supposed that the irradiated sample could be more accessible for ion exchange than that of non-irradiated one. Although the value of Si/Al ratio of LTA zeolite is supposed to be only 1, the effect of surface excess concentration of Al may affect the mode of adsorption of zeolite as will be seen later from correlation of different adsorption isotherms.</p><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> SEM of non-irradiated zeolite sample at different magnifications.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x3.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x4.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x5.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> SEM of 60 min irradiated zeolite sample at different magnifications.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x8.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR)</title><p>The EPR technique is usually used for the detection of paramagnetic centers. The bare zeolite matrix showed a two groups of signals, one centered at g = 4.3 and other at g = 2 which is due to the presence of iron impurities in the raw materials from which zeolite is prepared (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>The EPR of copper exchanged zeolites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) showed a sharp signal of Cu<sup>2+</sup> species which characterize the presence of highly paramagnetic species of copper in zeolite matrix. Although this signal is ordinary for Cu<sup>2+</sup> species in such matrix, a trial is done for correlate it to the amount of copper species inside the zeolite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This correlation was attained linearly with R<sup>2</sup> value near 96 means that it is possible to correlate the peak to peak signal to the amount of copper exchanged on the zeolite matrix. Although the relation is not pass through the origin as could be expected but this may be due to the overlap of signal of iron impurities exist in the bare zeolite matrix with those of copper species.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Ion Exchange Isotherms</title><p>The ion exchange isotherms of copper, nickel and lead ions of both zeolite samples (60 min time ultrasonic irradiated and non-irradiated) are shown in (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Form these figures; it could be observed that for both irradiated and non-irradiated samples the preference of Cu<sup>2+</sup> and Pb<sup>2+</sup> ions is much higher than that of Ni<sup>2+</sup>. Also, the ultrasonic irradiation affects slightly the preference</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> EPR spectrum of bare zeolite matrix</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> EPR spectra of different samples of ion exchanged copper zeolites at different concentrations</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between peak to peak lengths of EPR signal with the amount adsorbed per gram of copper</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Ion exchange isotherms of copper, nickel and lead ions over non-irradiated sample of zeolite with ultrasonic</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Ion exchange isotherms of copper, nickel and lead ions over 60 min ultrasonic irradiated sample of zeolite</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x13.png"/></fig><p>between Cu<sup>2+</sup> and Pb<sup>2+</sup>. (Figures 9-11) showed the different behavior of ultrasonic irradiation time on different ions separately. From these figures, it is clearly observed that there is a progressive increase in the amount adsorbed as the time of ultrasonic irradiation increases.</p><p>In order to deeply understand the ion exchange behavior of these samples Langmuir and Freundlish isotherms of different samples are fitted. The correlation factor of both sample are summarized in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). From this table, it could be recognized that the value of correlation of both isotherms are similar. In other words, the mechanism of ion exchange of these ions should be mixed between two isotherms.</p><p>Taking into consideration that the Feundlish isotherm could better represent</p><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the adsorption isotherm curve of Cu<sup>2+</sup> ions</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x14.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the adsorption isotherm curve of Ni<sup>2+</sup> ions</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x15.png"/></fig><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the adsorption isotherm curve of Pb<sup>2+</sup> ions</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x16.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Ion exchange capacity of different prepared samples with correlation factors of both Freundlsih and Langmuir isotherms over different samples examined</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ion exchanged capacity (mmol/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> Freundlisch isotherm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> Langmuir isotherm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> Freundlisch isotherm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> Langmuir isotherm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> Freundlisch isotherm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> Langmuir isotherm</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Duration of ultrasonic irradiation, min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Effect of lattice parameter (a) variation on the maximum capacity of removal of different ions</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403186x17.png"/></fig><p>the multilayer adsorption, however, Langmuir isotherm could better represent the monolayer one.</p><p>The last observation means that the adsorption in zeolite matrix occurs in non-stoichiometric behavior (i.e. not ion by ion), however the multilayer adsorption could be contributed. The multilayer adsorption could be understood by assuming that the metal ions could be precipitated due to the excess alkalinity inside the pores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76981-ref18">18</xref>] . And hence as proven before from XRD, SEM and EDX analysis that the ultrasonically irradiated samples showed larger size of both pores and crystals this may explain their ability to ion exchange by higher amount more than that of ultrasonic non-irradiated.</p><p>In order to declare the role of ultrasonic irradiation on the crystal lattice of zeolite and also with the ion exchange capacity, a relation between the lattice cell parameter of different ultrasonic irradiated and non-irradiated samples with the capacity of each ion exchanged under investigation in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2). From this figure it is clear observed that, there is a direct correlation between the crystal lattice parameter (a) with the capacity removed. And hence the crystal lattice was also directly correlated to the time of ultrasonic irradiation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Hence we can conclude that as the time of ultrasonic irradiation increases the capacity to be removed increases as a consequence of lattice parameter change.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>From the above study the following conclusions could be drawn:</p><p>1) Saudi white silica was used as an absorbing media of ultrasonic in the starting gel of the preparation of LTA zeolite.</p><p>2) The irradiation of ultrasonic rays while the preparation process of LTA zeolite affects mainly its crystal and width of its pore.</p><p>3) The EPR technique could be used as an alternative technique to measure the amount of copper exchanged on the surface of zeolite.</p><p>4) The different in the structure of zeolite during preparation (ultrasonic) appears mainly in its ion exchange behavior towards heavy metals.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>El Maksod, I.H.A., Kosa, S. and Hegazy, E.Z. (2017) The Effect of Preparation Conditions on the Removal Efficiency of Water Pollutants Using LTA Zeolite. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 811-821. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.97054</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76981-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hegazy, E.Z., Kosa, S.A. and Abd El Maksod, I.H. (2012) Synthesis and Characterization of JBW Structure and Its Thermal Transformation. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 196, 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2012.06.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hegazy, E.Z., Abd El Maksod, I.H. and Abo El Enin, R.M.M. (2010) Preparation and Characterization of Ti and V Modified Analcime from Local Kaolin. Applied Clay Science, 49, 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.04.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belviso, C., Cavalcante, F., Lettino, A. and Fiore, S. (2011) Effects of Ultrasonic Treatment on Zeolite Synthesized from Coal Fly Ash. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 18, 661-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.08.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belviso, C., Cavalcante, F. and Fiore, S. (2013) Ultrasonic Waves Induce Rapid Zeolite Synthesis in a Seawater Solution. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 20, 32-36.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.06.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Selim, M.M., Abd El Maksoud, I.H. and Fouda, M.F.R. (2004) The Role of Iron Species in Egyptian Kaolin Ore in the Conversion of Isopropanol over Some Zeolites Prepared from the Ore. Applied Catalysis A: General, 269, 193-201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.04.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Selim, M.M. and Abd El-Maksoud, I.H. (2005) Spectroscopic and Catalytic Characterization of Ni Nano-Size Catalyst for Edible Oil Hydrogenation. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 85, 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.06.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Selim, M.M. and Abd El-Maksoud, I.H. (2004) Hydrogenation of Edible Oil over Zeolite Prepared from Local Kaolin. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 74, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.06.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyett, R.E., Stevens, A.P., Ford, M.G. and Cox, P.A. (1996) A Quantitative Shape Analysis of Organic Templates Employed in Zeolite Synthesis. Zeolites, 17, 508-512.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-2449(96)00073-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, Y.K., Rajesh, K.P. and Yu, J.-S. (2013) Zeolite Materials Prepared Using Silicate Waste from Template Synthesis of Ordered Mesoporous Carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 260, 350-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, A., Wang, N. and Caro, J. (2012) Synthesis of Multi-Layer Zeolite LTA Membranes with Enhanced Gas Separation Performance by Using 3-Aminopro-Pyltriethoxysilane as Interlayer. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 164, 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.06.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guillou, L., Rouleau, L., Pirngruber, G. and Valtchev, V. (2009) Synthesis of FAU-Type Zeolite Membrane: An Original in Situ Process Focusing on the Rheological Control of Gel-Like Precursor Species. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 119, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.11.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sandoval, M.V., Henao, J.A., Ríos, C.A., Williams, C.D. and Apperley, D.C. (2009) Synthesis and Characterization of Zeotype ANA Framework by Hydrothermal Reaction of Natural Clinker. Fuel, 88, 272-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.08.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vong, F., Son, Y., Bhuiyan, S., Zhou, M., Cavalieri, F. and Ashokkumar, M. (2014) A Comparison of the Physical Properties of Ultrasonically Synthesized Lysozyme- and BSA-Shelled Microbubbles. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21, 23-28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.05.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Zong, Y., Fu, R., Niu, Y., Yue, G., Quan, Z., Wang, X. and Pan, Y. (2014) Poly(4-Vinylpyridine) Supported Acidic Ionic Liquid: A Novel Solid Catalyst for the Efficient Synthesis of 2,3-Dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-Ones under Ultrasonic Irradiation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, D.-J., Song, J.-F., Xu, A.-Q. and Liu, C.-Q. (2014) Optimization of the Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis of Lutein Disuccinate Using Uniform Design. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21, 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.06.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harikumar, K. and Rajendran, V. (2014) Ultrasound Assisted the Preparation of 1-Butoxy-4-Nitrobenzene under a New Multi-Site Phase-Transfer Catalyst—Kinetic Study. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21, 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.07.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jamei, M.R., Khosravi, M.R. and Anvaripour, B. (2014) A Novel Ultrasound Assisted Method in Synthesis of NZVI Particles. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21, 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.04.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76981-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, H.S., Jamil, T.S. and Hegazy, E.Z. (2010) Application of Zeolite Prepared from Egyptian Kaolin for the Removal of Heavy Metals: II. Isotherm Models. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182, 842-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.118</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>