<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJRad</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Radiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-3024</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojrad.2017.72012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJRad-76900</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Infectious Pathology of the Scrotum in Abidjan: Ultrasound Features of 80 Cases
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’goran</surname><given-names>Kouame</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fotso</surname><given-names>Sorel Manewa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amlan</surname><given-names>Marie-France Kouame</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anne-Marie</surname><given-names>N’goan-Domoua</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Roger-Daniel</surname><given-names>N’gbesso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Radiology, Yopougon University Hospital, Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>103</fpage><lpage>111</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>March</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>12,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiological-clinical profile of patients with scrotal infectious pathology in Abidjan and describe the ultrasound features of this scrotal infectious pathology. 
  Methods: This was a prospective study of 80 cases of scrotal infectious pathology objectified by ultrasound at Yopougon University Hospital from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015. Ultrasounds were performed using a high-frequency linear probe in B and Color Doppler modes by senior radiologists. The epidemiological-clinical data were recorded from the ultrasound request form and the interrogation of the patient. 
  Results: The average age was 23 years with extreme ranging from 16 to 40 years. Soldiers were the most concerned (40%) followed by students (30%). The painful large bursa was the quasi constant presenting feature (95% of cases) and fever was associated in less than half of the cases (45% of cases). The scrotal involvement was most often unilateral (85% of cases) and the left side was involved in 70% of the cases. Epididymitis was the most frequent pathology (60%) followed by orchiepididymitis (30%) and orchitis (10%). The most commonly encountered accompanying ultrasound findings were envelope thickening (100%), intravaginal fluid effusion (60%), and Doppler Hypervascularization (30%). 
  Conclusion: In Abidjan Scrotal infectious pathology is most often encountered among young soldiers or students most often with a &#177; febrile large bursa. The most common pathology is left unilateral epididymitis.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Orchitis</kwd><kwd> Epididymitis</kwd><kwd> Large Bursa</kwd><kwd> Male Genital Infection</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Scrotal pathology is common in both children and adults. It concerns nearly 200 reasons for consultation in Switzerland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref1">1</xref>] . In Mali, it constitutes 5.5% of urological consultations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref2">2</xref>] . Its etiologies are numerous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref3">3</xref>] . The spectrum of pathologies involving the scrotum and its contents extends from benign lesions- where you just need to reassure the patient- to severe lesions (tumor, torsion), whose management must be carried out for some in extreme urgency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref1">1</xref>] . Infections are part of this varied range of scrotal pathology in which they are predominant in sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref2">2</xref>] . Scrotal infections are defined as the involvement of scrotal content in relation to banal or specific organisms such as tuberculosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref4">4</xref>] . Their management must be carried out urgently and in a multidisciplinary facility because of their unpredictable evolution, which can be life- threatening (by septicemia) or lead to sterility.</p><p>The diagnosis of scrotal infectious pathology requires in an unavoidable way medical imaging represented by Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref3">3</xref>] . Indeed, more requested than MRI, Doppler ultrasound helps with positive diagnosis, lesion assessment, search for complications and differential diagnosis with the other non-infectious diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref1">1</xref>] . A good knowledge of ultrasound scanning of scrotal infections is necessary to reduce the proportion of unnecessary surgical exploration (1.5), given the unavailability of MRI in our countries and the black African specificities marked by late consultations.</p><p>It is in this context that our study proposes to determine the epidemiological and clinical profile of patients with scrotal infectious pathology and to describe the ultrasound features of the scrotal infectious pathology in Abidjan.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This is a prospective study that was carried out over a twelve-month period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 at Yopougon University Hospital. It involved all patients in whom a scrotal infectious pathology was discovered on the ultrasound scan. Ultrasounds were performed using a high frequency linear probe in B and color Doppler modes by senior radiologists. The epidemiological data were recorded from the ultrasound request form and the interrogation of the patient. The variables sought were age, occupation, previous history of sexually transmitted infections (STI) or urinary tract infection, notion of fever, direct and indirect ultrasound findings. The interpretation of the ultrasound findings was based on measuring the size of testes, epididymises and envelopes. It is also necessary to assess the echostructure of the different intra-scrotal structures, to seek intravaginal fluid effusion. We also assessed the vascularization of the different intra scrotal components without performing a thorough spectral analysis. Eight patients underwent urinary sampling, 5 sperm culture and 1 cytobacteriological examination of the urine. Data were processed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 16.0.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>All of our results are summarized in Tables 1-6.</p><p>A total of 80 patients were involved in our study. The average age of patients was 23 years with extremes of 16 to 40 years. Soldiers were the most concerned</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution according to age groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >AGE (year)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EFFECTIVE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The mean age was 23 years with a predominance of the age group between 21 and 25 years. No case was found before 15 years.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Overall Distribution according to the occupation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >OCCUPATION</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EFFECTIVE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soldiers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mechanics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tradespeople</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drivers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Soldiers were the most concerned (40%) followed by students (30%).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution according to the indication</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >INDICATION</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EFFECTIVE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Painful swelling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated scrotal pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isolated swelling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Painful swelling was the major indication in nearly half of the cases (95%).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Global distribution according to pathologies found</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >PATHOLOGY</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EFFECTIVE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orchi-epididymitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epididymitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orchitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Epididymitis was the most common pathology (60%).</p><p>(40%) followed by students (30%). The large painful bursa was the almost constant presenting features (95% of cases) and fever was associated in less than half of the cases (45% of cases). Scrotal involvement was mostly unilateral (85% of cases) and the left side was involved in 70% of cases. Epididymitis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) was the most frequent pathology (60%) followed by orchiepididymitis</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution according to ultrasound findings</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Anatomical Structure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ultrasound sign</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epididymis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Homogeneous thickening Heterogeneous thickening</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 36 - 36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 50 - 50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Testicle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Homogeneous hypertrophy Heterogeneous hypertrophy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 24 - 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 75 - 25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vaginal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Hydrocele - No effusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 48 - 32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 60 - 40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Envelopes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Thickened - Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 80 - 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 100 - 0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vessels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Hyper vascularization - Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 24 - 56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 30 - 70</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Epididymis was thickened in 100% of cases. There was an increase in the size of the testis in 75% of cases and a heterogeneous appearance was either localized or focal in 25% of cases.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution according to the identified germs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >GERM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EFFECTIVE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PERCENTAGE %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlamydiae trachomatis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neisseria gonorrhae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salmonella</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. Coli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Staphylococcus aureus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No germ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Neisseria gonorrhae (42.9%) and Chlamidya trachomatis (21.5%) were the most commonly encountered germs.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> 19-year-old patient. Painful right scrotal swelling. Scrotal ultrasound performed in B mode using an 11 MHz probe. Global hypertrophy of the right epididymis with thickening of the envelopes as opposed to the left side. Diagnosis retained: right epididymitis</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1780315x2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> 21 year-old Patient. Painful right scrotal swelling. Scrotal ultrasound performed in B mode using an 11 MHz probe. Global hypertrophy of the head of the right epididymis with thickening of the envelopes and reaction hydrocele with filaments. Diagnosis retained: chronic right epididymitis</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1780315x3.png"/></fig><p>(30%) and orchitis (10%). Semeiologically, the epididymis was thickened in 100% of cases. This thickening involved the whole epididymis in 60% of cases, the head in 30% of cases and the tail in 10% of cases. The appearance was heterogeneous with the presence of abscess in 30% of cases and 20% of cyst. In 50% of cases the thickening was homogeneous. Regarding orchitis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), there was an increase in the size of the gland in 75% of cases and a heterogeneous appearance either localized or focal in 25% of cases.</p><p>The most common accompanying ultrasound findings were envelope thickening (100%), intravaginal fluid effusion (60%), and Doppler hyper-vasculariza- tion (30%). Biological examinations revealed in 6 cases Neisseriae Gonorrhae and 3 cases of Chlamydiae Trachomatis, 2 cases of Staphylococcus aureus, 1 case of Salmonella and 1 case of E. Coli. In 1 case no germ was found.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Our study reveals that scrotal infectious pathology in Abidjan concerns young subjects with an average age of 23 years and a predominance of the age group ranging between 20 and 30 years. Our results agree with those of Mittmeyer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref5">5</xref>] who in a retrospective study of 610 cases in the United States Army found that the incidence peak was 20 - 29 years (49% of cases), within 70% of cases patients aged 20 - 39 years. It is the same for studies carried out by Klesser [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref6">6</xref>] in France and Agoda in Togo. In these studies the average age of patients was 21 years. The average age of patients was higher in England [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref7">7</xref>] according to Doble (28 years) and in the Ivory Coast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref8">8</xref>] according to Kouassi B (27 years old).</p><p>According to the literature, this is an affection related to sexually active subjects, thus explaining the extreme youth of the population but also the most exposed profession. In our work, soldiers were the most represented, followed by students. According to Ryan P. Smith [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref9">9</xref>] , epididymitis is the leading cause of hospitalization among soldiers in India. In the US, according to Luzzi, it is the</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> 26 year-old Patient. Painful right scrotal swelling. Scrotal ultrasound performed in B mode using an 11 MHz probe. Heterogeneous overall hypertrophy of the right testis with thickening of the envelopes as opposed to the left side. Diagnosis retained: orchitis</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1780315x4.png"/></fig><p>first urological affection observed during the military service and the consequence of this, a 3 week-hospitalization and a reduction of the time of the military service. Kouassi in Abidjan found 50% of students in his population.</p><p>Presenting features of scrotal infectious pathology were dominated by the large painful bursa in our study associated with fever in 46% of cases. Hence the notion of Aubert’s large hot bursa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref10">10</xref>] in opposition to the large cold bursa that includes pathologies such as hydrocele, inguinoscrotal hernia. According to this author, in the case of infection of scrotal contents, the patient presents an acute large bursa, fever and urinary signs (dysuria, pollakiuria). Fever was present in the study of Ouattara et al. in 52%. One-sidedness was essential in our study at 85%. We agree with data from the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref10">10</xref>] . According to Luizi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref10">10</xref>] , bilateral epididymitis is rare and could account for only 9% in the best series, which is explained by consecutive involvement.</p><p>The left bursa was the most concerned at 70%. This predominance of the left scrotal involvement was demonstrated by Kouassi in 100% of cases. The only case of tuberculousorchitis described by Agoda et al. was lateralized to the left. We are in contradiction with Luizzi et al. who consider that acute epididymitis involves the right and left sides with equal frequency.</p><p>Pathologically, our study showed that epididymitis was the most common pathology (60%) followed by orchiepididymitis (30%) and orchitis (10%). We agree with the literature that demonstrates primary epididymal involvement before secondary orchid contamination. According to Roy, primary infectious testicular involvement is right away bilateral and of viral origin (Mumps Orchitis), which is the prerogative of children, although in a small proportion the adult could be affected. Ouattara et al. demonstrated 100% of orchiepididymitis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) in their work. According to them, due to late consultation, the patients</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> 20 year-old Patient. Left painful and febrile scrotal swelling. Scrotal ultrasound performed in B mode coupled with color Doppler using a 7.5 MHz probe. Hypertrophy of the head of the left epididymis with thickening of the envelopes and a reaction hydrocele. Heterogeneous swelling of the testicle. Hypervascularization of the head of the epididymis and a testicular focus. Diagnosis retained: left orchiepididymitis</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1780315x5.png"/></fig><p>would have first developed epididymitis and consulted traditional healers before going to hospital in the orchiepididymitis stage.</p><p>Radiologically, scrotal analysis was performed in B mode and in Doppler mode using an 11 MHz probe. According to ROY, scrotal analysis must be done in high resolution with spectral studies associated. Contrast ultrasound is used by other authors in this pathology in order to make the difference between a tumor nodule and a pseudo-tumor orchitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref6">6</xref>] or between a zone of infarction and a tumor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Semeiologically, we have demonstrated direct signs and signs of accompaniment. Concerning epididymitis, the thickening was demonstrated in 100% of cases. This thickening involved the whole epididymis in 60% of cases, the head in 30% of cases and the tail in 10% of cases. The appearance was heterogeneous with the presence of abscess in 30% of cases and 20% of cyst. In 50% of cases the thickening was homogeneous.</p><p>Regarding orchitis, there was an increase in the size of the gland in 75% of cases and a heterogeneous appearance either localized or focal in 25% of cases.</p><p>The most commonly encountered ultrasound accompanying findings, whether epididymitis, orchitis or the combination of both were envelope thickening (100%), intravaginal fluid effusion (60%) and Doppler Hypervascularization (30%).</p><p>Our results agree with those of Pilatz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref12">12</xref>] . In their work epididymitis was primarily located in 24 cases (17.9%) in the head, 52 cases (38.8%) in the tail, and 58 cases (43.3%) in the entire epididymis. abscesses and Doppler Hypervascularization as well as hydrocele accompanied epididymitis in 5.9%, 100% and 45.5%, respectively.</p><p>These ultrasound findings have also been described by Roy et al. to whom epididymitis appears as hypoechoic hypertrophy of the epididymis with envelope thickening and marked Doppler Hypervascularization.</p><p>For Gonzalez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref13">13</xref>] , hydrocele, hematocele, pyocele, abscess and infarction are more complications than accompanying or indirect signs.</p><p>The heterogeneous appearance of the testis was found by Agoda et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref4">4</xref>] who described a multi-micronodular appearance related to a tuberculous involvement. In our study, there was no histopathological study or intra-scrotal sampling. This explains why we have not found a tuberculous etiology. However, sexually transmitted infections such as gonorrhea and chlamydial infection have dominated our etiologies. Our results are in contradiction with those of Ouattara in Mali which show that the predominant germs were Staphylococcus, Escherichia coli and streptococcus. This difference can be explained by the extreme youth of our population. Indeed, according to Bruce [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref13">13</xref>] , acute Chlamydiae trachomatis orchiepididymitis represent one third of the cases in young adults. This assertion is confirmed by the study by Luzzi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76900-ref14">14</xref>] who found a higher proportion of sexually transmitted germs followed by banal germs dominated by E. coli.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Considered as a common pathology, scrotal infections are widely explored on ultrasound worldwide. The technique that consists in using a high frequency probe associated with the color Doppler helps make positive diagnosis, look for complications and eliminate the other noninfectious pathologies. Our study showed that scrotal infectious pathology in Abidjan was most often encountered among young soldiers or students most often presenting a &#177; febrile painful large bursa. This pathology is most often represented by total epididymal hypertrophy associated with Doppler Hypervascularization and accompanied by complications such as abscesses and hydrocele. Sexually transmitted germs were the predominant etiologies. Sexual education of young people, the fight against STIs could help prevent scrotal infectious pathology in sub-Saharan Africa.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>None.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kouame, N., Manewa, F.S., Kouame, A.M.-F., N’goan- Domoua, A.-M. and N’gbesso, R.-D. (2017) Infectious Pathology of the Scrotum in Abidjan: Ultrasound Features of 80 Cases. Open Journal of Radiology, 7, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2017.72012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76900-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douaihy, N., Benamran, D.A., de Gorski, A., Poletti, P.A. and Iselin, C.E. (2011) Torsion testiculaire : une urgence piège. Revue Médicale Suisse, 7, 2404-2408.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouattara, K., Dafe, S.I., Yakwe, Y. and Cissé, C. (1991) Enquête sur les grosses bourses en milieu tropical. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 38, 850-855.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roy, C. and Tuchmann, C. (2003) Echographie scrotale. Journal of Radiology, 84, 581-595.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agoda-Koussema, L.K., Tchaou, M., Adjénou, V., Sonhaye, L., Anoukoum, T., Tengué, K., Amouzou, K. and N’Dakena, K. (2011) Testicule hétérogène à l’échographie: Penser également à la tuberculose après le cancer en zone d’endémie. Médecine Tropicale, 71, 100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mittemeyer, B.T., Lennox, K.W. and Borski, A.A. (1996) Epididymitis: A Review of 610 Cases. Journal of Urology, 95, 390-392.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kessler, E., Paulhac, P., Delcleve-Paulhac, S., Colombeau, P. and Dumas, J.-P. (2003) Forme pseudotumorale de l’orchiépididymite à chlamydiae trachomatis. Progrès en Urologie, 13, 1392-1393.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doble, A., Taylor-Robinson, D. and Thomas, B.J. (1989) Acute epididymitis: A Microbiological and Ultrasonographic Study. British Journal of Urology, 63, 90-94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1989.tb05132.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouassi, B., Horo, K., Gbazi, C., Ngom, A., Koffi, N., Aoussi, R.D., Aka, N., Aké, C., Kakou, D., Ahui, B., Godé, C., Aka-Danguy, E. and Itchy, M.V. (2009) Orchiepididymite tuberculeuse à propos de 2 cas enregistrés en pneumologie au CHU de Cocody. Mali Médical, 24, 68-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, R.P., Tracy, C.R., Kavoussi, P.K., Witmer, M.T. and Costabile, R.A. (2013) The Impact of Color Doppler Ultrasound on Treatment Patterns of Epididymitis in a University-Based Healthcare System. Indian Journal of Urology, 29, 22-26. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.109979</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aubert, D. and Moro-Enemuwe, A. (2008) Pathologie génito-scrotale chez le gar&amp;ccedilon et chez l’homme. La revue du praticien, 58, 2289-2297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lung, P.F., Jaffer, O.S., Sellars, M.E., Sriprasad, S., Kooiman, G.G. and Sidhu, P.S. (2012) Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Focal Testicular Complications Secondary to Epididymitis. American Journal of Roentgenology, 199, W345-W354. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pilatz, A., Wagenlehner, F., Bschleipfer, T., Schuppe, H.C., Diemer, T., Linn, T., Weidner, W. and Altinkilic, B. (2013) Acute Epididymitis in Ultrasound: Results of a Prospective Study with Baseline and Follow-up Investigations in 134 Patients. European Journal of Radiology, 82, e762-e768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruce, A.W., Chadwick, P., Willettw, S. and O’Shaughnessy, M. (1981) The Role of Chlamydiae in Genitourinary Disease. Journal of Urology, 126, 625-629.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76900-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luzzi, G.A. and O’Brien, T.S. (2001) Acute Epididymitis. BJU International, 87, 747-755. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02216.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>