<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2017.56013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-76885</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation of the River-Shallow Aquifer Exchange Process Effect on Surface Water Quality Deterioration
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ismail</surname><given-names>Karaoui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdelkrim</surname><given-names>Arioua</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdelkhalek</surname><given-names>El Amrani Idrissi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wafae</surname><given-names>Nouaim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Driss</surname><given-names>Elhamdouni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kamal</surname><given-names>Ait Ouhamchich</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Hssaisoune</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rachid</surname><given-names>Hnini</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Beni Mellal, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Oum Er-Rbia Hydraulic Basin Agency, Beni Mellal, Morocco</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>i.karaoui@usms.ma(IK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>123</fpage><lpage>134</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>12,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Recently, according to a survey carried out in Oued El Abid River by Oum Er-Rbia Hydraulic Basin Agency concerned about the surface water quality, the downstream course is undergoing continual degradation in its water quality comparable to the upstream. This study comes to localize the sources of pollution and explains the process of degradation, which affects the water quality in that area. For this purpose, an inspection of the place has been done during January 2017 to cover the entire zone limited by the affected part of river, followed by a survey, which interests to water quality and the ground-water depth. The inspection doesn’t show any direct liquid discharge into the river; meanwhile the water quality degradation is related to the underground sources through river-shallow-aquifer exchange process, when the obtained results from the survey showed that severe parameters are involved in the degradation of groundwater, as the geology and agricultural activities. Combining these results with flow direction in groundwater, it is clear that pollutants are transported to the river via the river-shallow aquifer exchange process, which affects its quality. Based on the finding results, this study will give the decision makers a simple view to a complex pollution processing.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Contamination</kwd><kwd> Groundwater</kwd><kwd> Oued El Abid River</kwd><kwd> Shallow Aquifer</kwd><kwd> Water Quality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Over the past centuries, human water uses have no impact on water availability till the middle of nineteen century [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref1">1</xref>] when the population had tripled from 2.3 to 7.3 billion human beings between 1940-2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref3">3</xref>] . Meanwhile the water consumption per capita, has jumped from 400 to 800 m<sup>3</sup> per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref1">1</xref>] . Such disequilibria is probably impossible to control, especially in some countries such as Africa and Asia which have a major lack of water quantity and quality, while some other parts of Asia, Latin America and Europe risk to face the same situation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The quality of surface waters is a very influential factor, which involves anthropogenic treats and influence urban, industrial, agricultural activities and natural processes which conduct to a degradation of surface waters and limitation of their use in industrial and agricultural fields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Human alteration of the landscape has an extensive influence over the water resource [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref7">7</xref>] , and the heat balance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref8">8</xref>] , which lead to increasing the temperature of water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref9">9</xref>] and modifying the biogeochemical processes in river that rise nutrient, oxygen, and sediment cycle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref10">10</xref>] . Therefore, the determination of spatial and temporal changes in water quality in river basins has been an objective of several studies in France, United Kingdom, Bulgaria, Greece, Canada, United State of America, South Korea, Nepal and central Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref11">11</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref19">19</xref>] . These studies showed that the anthropogenic activities greatly deteriorate the water quality in major rivers, passing through communities with an absence or inadequate wastewater treatment facilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>In Oued El Abid River, based on the last sampling field trip made by Oum Er-Rbia Hydraulic Basin Agency to control Oued El Abid River water quality, the downstream Course of the river faces a deterioration in its quality comparable to the upstream course although the absence of industrial activities and any direct eliminate of liquid waste from the communities nearby the river where people use septic tanks or rather eliminate heir waste on nature far away from the water courses. For this reason, the deterioration may be caused by groundwater, which transfers its pollutants to river through the river-shallow aquifer exchange processes.</p><p>The exchange between rivers and shallow aquifers greatly affects the quality of water resources, which is related to maintain the groundwater discharge during dry periods of the base-flow in rivers when there is no direct runoff from the land surface, and vice versa during the high flows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref21">21</xref>] . Where there are large exchanges of water between rivers and shallow aquifers, their physical characteristics and chemical constituents will be similar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>To assess exchanges between ground and surface waters, different methods are used depending on the spatial scale of interest. At a point of river, stream piezometers and chemical composition can be used to determine the vertical hydraulic gradient between ground and surface waters and identify regions where ground water discharges into the river [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>For this purpose, inspiring from several studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref24">24</xref>] done to characterize the river-shallow aquifer exchange process, we attempts on this research article to spot the relation river-shallow aquifer and its impact on Oued El Abid River quality deterioration in the downstream part.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The study started by making an inventory about pollution sources in the study area from documents collected in communes crossed by Oued El Abid River and diagnostic field trips of the current state of the study area. It is followed by measurement of groundwater depth and samples collection for analysis. To do this, a GPS (Garmin GPSMAP 62S) and a piezometric probe (100 meters) were used to localize wells and measure their groundwater depth. These measures later serve us as tools to develop several thematic maps that will help to localize the groundwater-river exchange places and determine its direction. Concerning water quality, samples were taken along Oued El Abid River and the groundwater of the study area. These samples were selected in a well-defined way to give an overview of the variation in the overall quality of the Oued El Abid River and the groundwater from one area to another. During field sampling, the in situ parameters were measured using a portable digital multi-parameter (3430, WTW&#174;) which measures the pH, electrical conductivity and dissolved oxygen. These samples were then transported in a glacier to maintain their same characteristics as in nature. At the laboratory, physic-chemical and bacteriological measurement was carried out (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) in order to complement other parameters necessary for surface and groundwater characterization. These analyses have been made in the Oum Er-Rbia Hydraulic Basin Agency laboratory (ABH) according to Moroccan standards of water quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>The coupling of depth results and laboratory measurements will allow us to define the effect of shallow aquifer and Oued El Abid River exchange process on water quality deterioration observed in the river. The following methodology designed below (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) gives the main axes of our study.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The diagram of work methodology</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x2.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Geologic Setting and Stratigraphic Framework</title><p>The study area limits run from Bzou town to the outlet of Oued El Abid watershed, in Beni Mellal-Kh&#233;nifra region, Morocco, stretching over 1094 Km<sup>2</sup> under semi-arid to arid climate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The annual rainfall varies from 637 mm as Max. and 38 mm as Min. with a mean of 350 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>From hydrogeological aspect, two types of aquifers are encountered in the study area, the deep Turonian aquifer and the phreatic Plio-Quaternary aquifers, Beni Moussa in the East and Tassaout downstream in the West [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Stratigraphically, the study area embodies a various startigraphic units ranging in age from Triassic to Quaternary (Pleistocene) as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>The stratigraphic units are classified from base to top as following:</p><p>Triassic: exist in the southern part of the study area. They are characterized by clay-bearing formations with evaporate minerals.</p><p>Jurassic: is localized towards the chains of the high atlas. It is represented by limestones, dolomites and marly limestone-bearing formations.</p><p>Cretaceous: appears on the surface at the Bzou region. It is characterized by intercalation of marls and limestone slabs.</p><p>Pliocene: is mostly represented in the study area. It is represented by lacustrine limestone, sand and marl.</p><p>Pleistocene: is the last age of the quaternary in this region. It is characterized by the presence of the continental conglomerate, sand and clay.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Location of the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x3.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Geologic map of the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x4.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>The results obtained in Oued El Abid River characterization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) revealed that the overall water quality decreased sharply starting from Bzou town comparably to the upstream part. We assume the sampling point (R1) as a reference of Oued El Abid water quality before deterioration. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the overall surface quality in Oued El Abid watershed.</p><p>According to the map above (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), the overall quality of Oued El Abid River is of good quality till the study area where it had changes and become of average quality. Meanwhile, the two tributaries of the Oued El Abid River, Assif N-Ahan&#231;al and Assif Melloul are of excellent quality.</p><p>Regarding the groundwater quality status, 10 well-dispersed samples on the study area were taken (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) in a manner to give a global vision and localize zones where groundwater undergo a degradation of its overall quality. The following table gives the obtained results in laboratory by analyzing the well samples and the last four points of Oued El Abid River (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Comparing laboratory results with groundwater quality standards in Morocco [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref27">27</xref>] , it is found that the wells P1, P2, P3, P7 and P8 are of good quality, while the P4 has an average quality due to electrical conductivity and chlorine that are classified in average category. Concerning the wells P5, P6, P9 and P10 are of poor quality by reason of high electrical conductivity which exceeds Moroccan standards, Chlorine and organic matter ratios of averages to poor quality.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Laboratory results of the last four river samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TAC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >OM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BOD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;S/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >390.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>EC: Electrical Conductivity. pH: Potential of Hydrogen. DO: Dissolved Oxygen. TA: Total Alcalinity. TAC: Complete Alkalimetric title. TH: Total Hardness. OM: Organic Matter. COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand. BOD: Biochemical Oxygen Demand.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Groundwater laboratory results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TAC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >OM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SF</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;S/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >UFC/100 ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >UFC/100 ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >UFC/100 ml</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >610</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >950</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >740</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >582.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7690</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1988.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >603.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >871.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6892</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>FC: Fecal Coliforms. SF: Fecal Streptococci. TC: Total Coliforms.</p><p>To check and verify the relation between water quality degradation and those wells revealed of mediocre and bad quality, we made a measurement of depth at 44 wells that are well-dispersed to cover the study area, in order to produce a map of groundwater level variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), and then determine where the groundwater is near the surface and threatened by pollution.</p><p>According to the depth map above (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), it can be seen that a large part of Oued El Abid River in the study area is not crossing a groundwater very deeply (varying between 9 m to 27 m), which makes it close to the surface.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>The laboratory results indicate that the eastern part of Oued El Abid River displays pollutions in its water quality caused by high concentration of mineral salt. This is expressed by high level of electrical conductivity at the wells P4, P5, P6, P9 and P10. The high levels could be explained in a way that groundwater flows through geological formations of Liasic to Plio-Quaternary age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), of lacustrine origin and are rich in evaporates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref29">29</xref>] . In the study area, the evaporate- bearing formations are generally composed of gypsum, which is easily diluted in water contact [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref30">30</xref>] . The high concentration of chlorine and slight concentration</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Water quality status in Oued El Abid River and its tributaries</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Location of wells samples in the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x14.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Depth variation of groundwater in the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2170446x15.png"/></fig><p>of nitrate could be explained by the returning of irrigation water rich in fertilizers to the shallow aquifer due to high aquifer transmissivity in Beni Moussa irrigated perimeter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref32">32</xref>] . These fertilizers are generally used in the right bank of the El Abid River (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), to increase beet yield and wheat production, which represent the major part of the main agricultural activities in this area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><p>Concerning the groundwater flow direction, as several studies done in Beni Moussa irrigated perimeter shows, it takes place towards the South West, going to Oued El Abid River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref35">35</xref>] . This Flow direction coupled with high transmissivity in the study area can lead to drainage of the loaded waters with the different pollutants to the river.</p><p>In bacteriological point of view, we analyze the indicators of pollution parameters which include Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms, and Fecal Streptococci, these three parameters allow us to define the pollution origin which is related to the quantitative ratio of Fecal Coliforms on Fecal Streptococci (CF/SF). When this CF/SF ratio is greater than 4, the pollution is essentially human (discharge of the waste water) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref36">36</xref>] , and origin animal when it is less than 0.7 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref37">37</xref>] . For our case, the pollution is related to human activity (sampled point P1) near Bzou city, in which people use much degraded septic tanks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76885-ref38">38</xref>] , while in the other sites, the pollutions are related to animals, due to agricultural and livestock activities.</p><p>By comparing the various parameters measured at wells with those taken in Oued El Abid River, it is observed that starting from sampled point R2, there is a correlation between the high levels of chemical parameters among the river and groundwater (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Therefore, it might be said hat the Oued El Abid River drains the Beni Moussa groundwater and eventually becomes polluted also. In addition to that, the liquid discharges from degraded septic tanks of Bzou center imports its bacterial pollution to groundwater and subsequently Oued El Abid River.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The results obtained in this study show that the source of pollution in Oued El Abid surface waters is strongly linked to the exchange river aquifer that is revealed in the direction of Oued El Abid river, which drains the groundwater from Beni Moussa shallow aquifer. These underground waters were analyzed in the laboratory, and it was found that they are degraded by the anthropogenic activities of the neighboring river agglomeration. Those agglomerations are using fertilizers to increase the yield of their agricultural products and well degraded septic tanks which infiltrate wastewater into groundwater. These two parameters are the main source of anthropogenic pollution in the study area. Natural degradation also affects the water quality of Oued El Abid River; this is observed in the study area with the high concentration of mineral salts resulting from geological origin and lead to high electrical conductivity values.</p><p>However, the aim of our study is to determine the reasons behind Oued El Abid downstream course water quality deterioration is achieved, to this effect, it is necessary to react preserving this vital source against the main sources of anthropogenic pollutions, which will lead to a deterioration that will be much worse if it is not stopped at the moment.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Karaoui, I., Arioua, A., El Amrani Idrissi, A., Nouaim, W., Elhamdouni, D., Ait Ouhamchich, K., Hssaisoune, M. and Hnini, R. (2017) Evaluation of the River-Shallow Aquifer Exchange Process Effect on Surface Water Quality Deterioration. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.56013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76885-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyd, C.E. (2015) Water Quality: An Introduction. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17446-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LeRoy, P. (1995) Troubled Waters: Population and Water Scarcity. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 6, 299.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Nations, Department of Economic and Social, Population Division (2015) World Population Prospects. The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cosgrove, W.J., Rijsberman, F.R. (2014) World Water Vision: Making Water Everybody’s Business. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carpenter, S.R., Caraco, N.F., Correll, D.L., Howarth, R.W., Sharpley, A.N. and Smith, V.H. (1998) Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 8, 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, H. (2005) Spatial and Temporal Variations of Water Quality in the Han River and Its Tributaries, Seoul, Korea, 1993-2002. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 161, 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-4286-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Claessens, L., Hopkinson, C., Rastetter, E. and Vallino, J. (2006) Effect of Historical Changes in Land Use and Climate on the Water Budget of an Urbanizing Watershed. Water Resources Research, 42, W03426. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004131</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oke, T.R. (2002) Boundary Layer Climates. Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nelson, K.C. and Palmer, M.A. (2007) Stream Temperature Surges under Urbanization and Climate Change: Data, Models, and Responses1. Wiley Online Library, Hoboken, NJ.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baker, A. (2003) Land Use and Water Quality. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, 16, 188.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meybeck, M. (2002) Riverine Quality at the Anthropocene: Propositions for Global Space and Time Analysis, Illustrated by the Seine River. Aquatic Sciences, 64, 376-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012593</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Simeonov, V., Stratis, J.A., Samara, C., Zachariadis, G., Voutsa, D., Anthemidis, A., Sofoniou, M. and Kouimtzis, T. (2003) Assessment of the Surface Water Quality in Northern Greece. Water Research, 37, 4119-4124.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00398-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanrahan, G., Gledhill, M., House, W.A. and Worsfold, P.J. (2003) Evaluation of Phosphorus Concentrations in Relation to Annual and Seasonal Physico-Chemical Water Quality Parameters in a UK Chalk Stream. Water Research, 37, 3579-3589.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00265-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bu, H., Tan, X., Li, S. and Zhang, Q. (2010) Temporal and Spatial Variations of Water Quality in the Jinshui River of the South Qinling Mts., China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 73, 907-913.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crosa, G., Froebrich, J., Nikolayenko, V., Stefani, F., Galli, P. and Calamari, D. (2006) Spatial and Seasonal Variations in the Water Quality of the Amu Darya River (Central Asia). Water Research, 40, 2237-2245.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dawe, P. (2006) A Statistical Evaluation of Water Quality Trends in Selected Water Bodies of Newfoundland and Labrador. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 5, 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1139/s05-019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kannel, P.R., Lee, S., Kanel, S.R., Khan, S.P. and Lee, Y.-S. (2007) Spatial-Temporal Variation and Comparative Assessment of Water Qualities of Urban River System: A Case Study of the River Bagmati (Nepal). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 129, 433-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9375-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stubblefield, A.P., Reuter, J.E., Dahlgren, R.A. and Goldman, C.R. (2007) Use of Turbidometry to Characterize Suspended Sediment and Phosphorus Fluxes in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California, USA. Hydrological Processes, 21, 281-291.https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6234</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Astel, A., Tsakovski, S., Barbieri, P. and Simeonov, V. (2007) Comparison of Self-Organizing Maps Classification Approach with Cluster and Principal Components Analysis for Large Environmental Data Sets. Water Research, 41, 4566-4578.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winter, T.C. (1998) Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource. DIANE Publishing Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bencala, K.E. (2000) Hyporheic Zone Hydrological Processes. Hydrological Processes, 14, 2797-2798.https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(20001030)14:15&lt;2797::AID-HYP402&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konrad, C.P. (2006) Location and Timing of River-Aquifer Exchanges in Six Tributaries to the Columbia River in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Journal of Hydrology, 329, 444-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Constantz, J. and Stonestrom, D.A. (2003) Heat as a Tracer of Water Movement near Streams. U.S. Geological Survey Circular, No. 1260, 1-96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y. and Jiao, J.J. (2012) Origin of Groundwater Salinity and Hydrogeo-chemical Processes in the Confined Quaternary Aquifer of the Pearl River Delta, China. Journal of Hydrology, 438-439, 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laaroussi, M. (2005) Ma&amp;#238trise de l’irrigation pour une gestion durable du périmètre irrigué de Tadla (Control of Irrigation for Sustainable Management of the Irrigated Perimeter of Tadla). 19th Congress and 56th International Executive Council Meeting, 10-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etienne, D., Guessab, H. and Coll, C. (1975) Ressources en eau du Marne. Tome 2, Plaines et bassins du Maroc Atlantique (Water Resources of the Marne. Volume 2, Plains and Basins of Morocco). Notes Mém Serv Géol Maroc, 299-364.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministère de l’Eau et de l’Environnement (2002) Moroccan Standards for Surface Water Quality. Official Bulletin No. 5062.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Destombes, J. (1952) Gypse, sel et autres substances des dép&amp;#244ts d’évaporation (Gypsum, Salt and Other Substances from Evaporation Deposits). XIX Congrès Géol Int Monogr Région 3e Sér Maroc, No. 1, 359-370.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Hammoumi, N., Sinan, M., Lekhlif, B. and El Mahjoub, L. (2012) évaluation de la qualité des eaux souterraines pour l’utilisation dans l’eau potable et l’agriculture: Plaine de Tadla, Maroc (Assessment of Groundwater Quality for Use in Drinking Water and Agriculture: Tadla Plain, Morocco). Afrique Science: Revue Internationale des Sciences et Technologie, 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ettazarini, S. (2006) Mapping of Groundwater Quality in the Turonian Aquifer of Oum Er-Rabia Basin, Morocco: A Case Study. Environmental Geology, 50, 919-929.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0263-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Testud</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>Engrais minéraux</article-title><source> EMC—Toxicologie-Pathologie</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 21</fpage>-<lpage>28</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vandenberghe, C., De Toffoli, M., Lambert, R. and Colinet, G. (2016) L’épandage d’engrais de ferme avant le semis d’une culture intermédiaire (CIPAN) présente-t-il un risque important de lixiviation de nitrate? (Does the Application of Farm Fertilizers Prior to Sowing of an Intermediate Crop (ICNAF) Pose a Significant Risk of Nitrate Leaching?). Biotechnologie Agronomie Societe et Environnement, 20, 143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zitouni, M. and Ibouh, H. (2016) Apport de la télédétection dans l’évaluation de la variation des surfaces d’eau, du sol et du couvert végétal dans la Plaine du Tadla entre 1984 et 2015 (Remote Sensing Contribution in the Assessment of the Water Variation, Soil and Vegetation Cover in the Tadla Plain between 1984 and 2015). Morocco.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hess, C., Missante, G. and Schoen, U. (1964) étude minéralogique des argiles de quelques roches-mères et sols des Beni Moussa—Tadla (Mineralogical study of the clays and soil of Beni Moussa—Tadla). Al Awamia, 10, 115-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hsissou, P.C.Y. and Mania, J. (1996) L’aquifère des calcaires du Turonien (Bassin du Tadla, Maroc). Alimentations locales et lointaines à partir de l’Atlas The aquifer of Turonian limestones (Tadla Basin, Morocco) (The Turonian Limestone Aquifer. Local and Distant Recharge from the The Aquifer of Turonian Limestones in Atlas). Local and Remote Groundwater Recharge from the Atlas, 433-443.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borrego, A.F. and Romero, P. (1982) Study of the Microbiological Pollution of a Malaga Littoral Area II. Relatsh. Fecal Coliforms Fecal Streptococci VIème Journ. Pollut. Cannes Fr, 561-569.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geldreich, E.E. and Litsky, W. (1976) Fecal Coliform and Fecal Streptococcus Density Relationships in Waste Discharges and Receiving Waters. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 6, 349-369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76885-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CA&amp;#207DAT BZOU (2009) Diagnostic Territorial Participatif de la commune rurale de BZOU.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>