<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2017.56012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-76884</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Landslide Monitoring Point Optimization Deployment Based on Fuzzy Cluster Analysis
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhaoyang</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>College of Geology &amp;amp; Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>118</fpage><lpage>122</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>10,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>12,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Landslide monitoring is one of the important means to landslide control. In order to do well this job in landslide monitoring work, first in ascertaining the geological conditions, then laying out a variety of professional monitoring points. This paper adopts the fuzzy cluster analysis method, and the landslide monitoring points by using fuzzy cluster analysis method, through the calculation of deformation of fuzzy clustering, finally draws the conclusion that the landslide monitoring point classification. The method for the landslide monitoring point optimization, as well as the landslide deformation monitoring plan modification and perfect have very important reference value.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Landslide</kwd><kwd> Monitoring</kwd><kwd> Fuzzy Cluster</kwd><kwd> Optimization Deployment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, research on landslide monitoring has been paid highly attention by researchers both at home and abroad, and significant progress has been made. At present, many landslides have carried out a wide range and costly professional monitoring work, professional monitoring means, and achieved a certain monitoring effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76884-ref1">1</xref>] . Zhang et al. (2007) based on the basic principle of time domain reflection test technology, proposed the field work method of time domain reflection test in landslide monitoring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76884-ref2">2</xref>] . Miao et al. (2010) have made a comprehensive evaluation of the results of multi-model prediction of landslide displacement, so as to optimize the best model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76884-ref3">3</xref>] . Zhu (2010) established a multidimensional model of landslide displacement monitoring, and data mining analysis on the basis of multidimensional data set [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76884-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>To carry out landslide professional monitoring, the layout of the professional means of monitoring, first of all must be found on the basis of geological conditions. Based on the geological analysis, this paper analyzes the deployment of landslide professional monitoring points by fuzzy clustering analysis, and makes the related research on the optimization of landslide monitoring.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Clustering Analysis</title><p>The representativeness, accuracy, and reasonable setting of monitoring points are the key environments to ensure successful monitoring. Therefore, by optimizing the monitoring points, it is of great significance to obtain the monitoring quality of the maximum space with the least number of monitoring points. Based on the analysis results and the actual situation of the landslide, it can provide the basis for the optimization of the landslide monitoring points and the monitoring of the optimal distribution points [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76884-ref5">5</xref>] . There are many methods of cluster analysis; commonly used is system clustering method, stepwise clustering method and fuzzy clustering method. In this paper, fuzzy clustering analysis is used to analyze the deployment of landslide monitoring points.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Fuzzy Clustering Analysis</title><p>Landslide monitoring and analysis is the prerequisite and foundation of landslide prediction, and the results of landslide prediction are directly related to the distribution of monitoring points on landslide. In the landslide prediction, it is necessary to model the mathematical model based on the monitored data. It is a complicated and cumbersome to use the analysis of the points separately. Therefore, before the landslide monitoring point modeling, the fuzzy monitoring analysis of each monitoring point, mathematical modeling of each kind of monitoring points, and then use the built mathematical model for deformation analysis, which can reduce the follow-up calculation workload, so as to improve work efficiency. After fuzzy clustering, through the classification of deformation points, for understanding the landslide deformation of the partition has a very important reference value. The fuzzy clustering analysis procedure is as follows.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Standardization</title><p>Establish the data matrix: set the domain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the classification of the object, each object by m indicators that its character, that,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Thus, the original data matrix is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76884-formula103"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In practical problems, different data generally have different dimensions. In order to compare the amount of different dimensions, it is usually necessary to make appropriate changes to the data. There are generally translational standard deviation transform, translation range transformation and logarithmic transformation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Establish Fuzzy Similarity Matrix</title><p>Set the domain to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, according to the traditional clustering method to determine the similarity coefficient, the establishment of fuzzy similarity matrix. The method of calculating the similarity degree <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> mainly uses the similarity coefficient method, distance method and other methods of traditional clustering analysis. According to the characteristics of the problem, select a different formula to calculate.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Calculate the Fuzzy Equivalence Matrix</title><p>According to the fuzzy matrix obtained by the calibration, only a fuzzy similarity matrix R is not necessarily transitive, that is, R is not necessarily a fuzzy equivalent matrix. In order to classify, it is also necessary to transform R into a fuzzy equivalence matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The quadratic method can be used to pass the closure<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the fuzzy similarity matrix is transformed into a fuzzy equivalent matrix.</p><p>Starting from the fuzzy similarity matrix R, the squares are obtained in turn, that is, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, When the first occurrence of</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(indicating <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is transitive), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the required transitive closure<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Example Analysis</title><p>The fuzzy clustering method is used to analyze a landslide body. In the landslide body is distributed with five monitoring points, the use of GPS every two months to monitor once. The data to be monitored are analyzed by fuzzy clustering analysis.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Data Standardization</title><p>1) Data matrix</p><p>Using the landslide GPS monitoring data, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Get the original matrix of landslide monitoring data, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>2) Data standardization</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Landslide deformation monitoring point data tables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >monitoring point number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >9</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >11</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >12</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The data are converted using the translation range method.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76884-formula104"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) After the data is standardized, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Calibration (The Establishment of Fuzzy Similarity Matrix)</title><p>Calculate the degree of similarity, where the maximum and minimum methods in the similarity coefficient method are used.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76884-formula105"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The similarity matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is calculated according</p><p>to Equation (3). <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>indicates the degree of similarity between the i and j points.</p><p>Landslide monitoring point deformation fuzzy similarity matrix</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76884-formula106"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Clustering (Calculate the Fuzzy Equivalence Matrix)</title><p>The fuzzy equivalence matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is calculated as:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>From large to small <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to cluster analysis.</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, U can be divided into five categories P1, P2, P3, P4, P5</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The original matrix of landslide monitoring data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >36.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >49</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >51.4</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Data sheet normalized</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.1818</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.0822</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.4909</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.1237</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.0455</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.0916</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.7682</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.458</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7153</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5779</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3129</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1676</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2977</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5665</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2603</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, U can be divided into {P1, P2}, {P3}, {P4}, {P5}</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, U can be divided into P1, P2, P3, P4, P5</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, U can be divided into {P1, P4}, P2, P3, P5</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, U can be divided into P1, {P2, P4}, P3, P5</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, U can be divided into {P1, P2, P3, P4}, P5</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, U can be divided into P1, P2, P3, P4, P5.</p><p>In the actual monitoring situation, the P1, P3 and P5 monitoring points are located at the front, middle and trailing edges of the landslide, while the P2 and P4 points are located on both sides of the central monitoring point P3. From the classification of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> results can be seen, when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, points P2 and P4 for a class, the other monitoring points were a class.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The fuzzy clustering analysis is used to analyze the continuous data of landslide monitoring and deformation, which is helpful to classify the deformation points of landslides. At the same time, in the monitoring, if the use of fuzzy clustering analysis and the deformation point of the cluster can greatly reduce the follow-up workload and improve work efficiency, in the practical application, due to the clustering analysis of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2170450x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values is not easy to determine, so it’s needed to combine the scene of the actual investigation of the landslide to monitor the classification of the points.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wang, Z.Y. (2017) Landslide Monitoring Point Optimization Deployment Based on Fuzzy Cluster Analysis. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 116-120. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.56012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76884-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J.L., Xu, W.Y., Jin, H.Y., et al. (2009) Safety Monitoring and Stability Analysis of Large-Scale and Complicated High Rock Slope. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 28, 1820-1827.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76884-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q., Shi, Y.X. and Lin, J. (2007) Landslide Monitor Technique Based on TDR. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 37, 134-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76884-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miao, H.B., Yin, K.L., Xu, F., et al. (2010) Comprehensive Evaluation on Multiple Predictions of the Landslide Displacements Based on Component Analysis. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 32, 65-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76884-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, C.H. and Hu, G.D. (2010) Data Mining in Landslide Monitoring Based on Multidimensional Modeling. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 30, 121-124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76884-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z.Y. (2012) Study on the Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Landslide Monitoring and Forecast—A Case Study of Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>