<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2017.87066</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-76869</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Relativistic Formulae for the Biquaternionic Model of Electro-Gravimagnetic Charges and Currents
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lyudmila</surname><given-names>Alexeyeva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Institute of Mathematics and Mathematical Modeling, Almaty, Kazakhstan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1043</fpage><lpage>1052</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>11,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>14,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Here the biquaternionic model of electro-gravimagnetic field (EGM-field) has been considered, which describes the change of EGM-fields, charges and currents in their interaction. The invariance of these equations with respect to the group of Poincare-Lorentz transformations has been proved. The relativistic formulae of transformation for density of electric and gravity-magnetic charges and currents, active power and forces have been obtained.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Electro-Gravimagnetic Field</kwd><kwd> Electric Charge</kwd><kwd> Gravimagnetic Charge</kwd><kwd> Cur-rent</kwd><kwd> Poincare-Lorentz Transformation</kwd><kwd> Relativistic Formula</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The mathematical representation of physical processes in various media is always connected with the choice of the coordinate system. For example, the coordinates of vectors, gradients, and rotors of physical fields change by transfer from one coordinate system to another. Therefore, in the construction of mathematical models of physical processes, in addition to the various equations and relationships which connect their physical characteristics in some coordinate system, the laws of transformation of these quantities and relations must be determined when passing from one coordinate system to another.</p><p>The most common one is the Cartesian coordinate system. Since its choice in Euclidean space is quite arbitrary both with respect to the origin of coordinates and with respect to the orientation of its base frames, therefore, for any mathematical model it is necessary to determine the transformation formulas of all relations and magnitudes for orthogonal group of coordinate transformations and for frame shift. It is well known that the equations of motion of homogeneous media in Newtonian mechanics are invariant with respect to these transformations and Galilean transformations in coordinate systems moving relative to each other at a constant speed in a fixed direction. For isotropic media, the equations of motion even retain their form, for anisotropic media they are transformed in accordance with the rules of tensor analysis.</p><p>However in dynamics of electromagnetic media these properties don’t remain. In particular, H.A. Lorentz proved that Maxwell equations are not invariant under Galilean transformation, and he constructed the linear transformation keeping their invariance in Minkowski space [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref1">1</xref>] . This transformation began to be called Lorentz’s transformation, and transformation formulae (relativistic formulae) have formed the basis of the relativity theory of A. Einstein. Poincare, investigating Maxwell’s equations, constructed the group of linear transformations keeping their invariance in Minkowski space [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref2">2</xref>] . They represent superposition of orthogonal transformations and Lorentz’s transformation.</p><p>In the real work the biquaternionic model is considered, which is earlier offered by the author for electro-gravimagnetic (EGM) fields, charges and currents, and their invariance relative to the group of Poincare-Lorentz transformations on Minkowski space is investigated.</p><p>In the papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref4">4</xref>] the biquaternionic model of electro-gravimagnetic (EGM) field has been considered which is designated as biquaternionic A-field. For this the Hamilton form of Maxwell’s equations has been used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref5">5</xref>] and its quaternionic record [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref6">6</xref>] . Based on the hypothesis of a magnetic charge, it’s carried out field complexification with the introduction of the gravimagnetic density to the Maxwell equations. The closed system of equations of EGM-charges and currents interaction has been constructed, which is the field analogue of the three famous Newton’s laws for mechanics of material points.</p><p>Here we prove an invariance of these equations with respect to Poincare-Lo- rentz transformation. We obtain the relativistic formulas for the densities of electric and gravimagnetic charges and currents, active power and forces by their interaction. At first we give some definitions of differential algebra of biquaternions, for not to refer the reader to other author’s works to read this article. Then we consider how biquaternionic differential operators-mutual bigradients are changing by these transformations. After that we’ll consider equations of EGM-charge and current transformation under action of external EGM-field and construct relativistic formulas for all introduced values.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Biquaternions in the Minkowski space Some Definitions and Designations</title><p>We consider the linear functional space of biquaternions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is complex function , <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is complex vector-function on Minkowski space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It is linear space:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula235"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the known operation of quaternionic multiplication</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula236"><label>(1.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here scalar product<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, vector product<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is Leavy-Chivitta symbol,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We use the following notations.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula237"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula238"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>when it exists.</p><p>Complex conjugate Bq. to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula239"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the bar over symbol denotes the complex conjugate number.</p><p>Unitary Bq <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> .</p><p>Conjugate Bq.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> , then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is self-conjugated Bq.</p><p>Scalar production of biquaternions is the bilinear operation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula240"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The norm of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula241"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The pseudo norm of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula242"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We use biquaternionic differential operators which are named mutual bigradients:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula243"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula244"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula245"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Their superposition has the useful property:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula246"><label>(1.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is classic wave operator (d’alambertian).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Poincare-Lorentz Transformation on M</title><p>We can quaternize Minkowski space if to enter complex conjugate Bqs:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula247"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>They are self-conjugated:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula248"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula249"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If to enter the Bqs</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula250"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula251"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula252"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then we have the biquaternionic form of Lorentz transformation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula253"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This implies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula254"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula255"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If to denote</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula256"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then we have well known formulas of</p><p>Lorentz transformation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula257"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula258"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which corresponds to the motion of the system in the direction of the vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with a dimensionless velocity<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The pseudo norm is preserved as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula259"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, with the help of conjugated biquaternions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula260"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula261"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we can write a group of orthogonal transformations on the vector part of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula262"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This implies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula263"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula264"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is the turn of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> around the vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at the angle<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The time <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> does not change. This transformation preserves the norm and the pseudo-norm<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma1. Poincare-Lorentz transformation on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula265"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is equal to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula266"><label>(3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula267"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. By use of associativity of biquaternionic product we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula268"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula269"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>After calculating the scalar and vector part we obtain (3.8). Here the unit vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> determines the direction of motion of the new coordinate system, and other parameters define the speed of motion and the angle of rotation, as has been shown above.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Biquaternionic Representation of EGM-Field Characteristics</title><p>For EGM-field description we entered next biquaternions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref5">5</xref>] :</p><p>EGM-potential <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>EGM-intensity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Charge-current <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Energy-impulse of EGM-field</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula270"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the complex vector-function of intensities of EGM-field:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula271"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the electric and gravimagnetic field intensities, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the constants of electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability. The potential part of the vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> describes the intensity of the gravitational field, and the vortex part defines the magnetic field.</p><p>The charge density of the EGM-field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is expressed in terms of the electric charge density <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the gravymagnetic mass density<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula272"><label>(4.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Electro-gravimagnetic current <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is expressed in terms of the electric current density (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and it gravymagnetic current density (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula273"><label>(4.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The equation of EGM field has the form</p><p>Maxwell equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula274"><label>(4.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It shows that the charge-current is physical appearance of the bigradient of EGM-intensity.</p><p>If bigradient of EGM-intensity is equal to zero then there are not charges and currents. But EGM-intensity isn’t equal zero by this; it is the solution of homogeneous Equation (4.3) with zero right part.</p><p>The equation of the EGM-field (4.3) allows to determine the charges and currents if the intensity is known. Vice versa, it gives possibility to find the field intensities as a solution of certain boundary-value problems by known charges and currents. That is they are a single system “field-substance-field”, mutually generating each other.</p><p>The other biquaternions of the EGM-field are connected by the following relations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula275"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Equation (4.3) is generalization of biquaternionic form of Maxwell equation for which<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In this case potential must to satisfy to the Lorentz gauge:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula276"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula277"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this case from the scalar part of the last equation we obtain the</p><p>Charge conservation law</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula278"><label>(4.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By this cause we name Eq. (4.3) the Maxwell equation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Poincare-Lorentz Transformation of Mutual Bigradients</title><p>At first we define how the mutual complex gradients of the biquaternion are transformed under the Poincare-Lorentz transformations from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In the new coordinates system <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Lemma 5.1. If</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula279"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula280"><label>(5.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Using the differentiation rules according to (3.8), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula281"><label>(5.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These relations coincide with (3.8) upon replacement<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which corresponds to the first formula (5.1). The second formula of the lemma is proved similarly.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Charges-Currents Interaction Equations</title><p>To describe the interaction between two systems of charges and currents <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we introduced in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref7">7</xref>] the biquaternions of</p><p>Power-force</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula282"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Vector parts of these Bqs describe the forces of external EGM-field. Scalar parts describe the power of these forces.</p><p>Changing the charge-currents under the influence of the electro-gravimag- netic field of other charges and currents is described by the following system:</p><p>Law of charges-currents interactions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula283"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula284"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula285"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here the constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is introduced by cause the physical dimension of left and right part.</p><p>Two first equations correspond to the second Newton’s law, second one - to the third Newton’s law (the action is equal to the contraction). Together with the last Maxwell equations for A-fields, they give the closed system of differential equations for the determination of charge-currents transformation by their interaction.</p><p>We note that in the case of absence of external fields (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) we have from here:</p><p>Free <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-field equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula286"><label>(6.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This system gives possibility to construct charges, currents and intensities of free EGM-fields (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref3">3</xref>] ).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Relativistic Formulas for Charges and Currents</title><p>The invariance of the quaternionic forms of Maxwell equations with respect to the group of Poincare-Lorentz transformations has been well known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref9">9</xref>] . We’ll show that the equations of charge-current transformation are invariant under these transform and obtain relativistic formulas for all physical values in these equations.</p><p>Theorm 7.1. After Poincare-Lorentz transformation on M, the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-transfor- mation equation retains the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula287"><label>(7.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula288"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Following Lemma 4.1, using the associativity of the product, we obtain these formulae:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula289"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>by analogy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (3.7) by use (4.1) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula290"><label>(7.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If to calculate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by analogy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (3.7) by use the property of complex conjugated values:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula291"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we get by use (7.1)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula292"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula293"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Defining the scalar and vector parts of the corresponding biquaternions, we obtain relations for charge and current densities and for power and force. The theorem has been proved.</p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an orthogonal transformation, then we obtain the usual recalculation of the coordinates of the vector part of biquaternions for orthogonal transformations. In this case, the scalar parts of the biquaternions (the charge and mass density and the power of the acting electric and gravimagnetic forces) do not change: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is classic Lorentz transformation (3.2) then from this theorem, with allowance for (3.4), it follows the next.</p><p>Relativistic formulae for charge and current:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula294"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By use (3.5) we get</p><p>Relativistic formulae for power and force:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula295"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula296"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x122.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will write these relations separately for the real and imaginary components of charges and currents, taking into account the notations introduced in point 4. From the real part, we obtain the Lorentz transformation formulae for the densities of electric charge and electric current:</p><p>Relativistic formulae for electric and gravimagnetic charge and current:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula297"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76869-formula298"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We notice that in the formula of transformation of gravimagnetic mass density the first composed gives Einstein increasing in mass in mobile system of coordinates and tends to infinity by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The second summand can it both to increase, and to reduce, depending on the direction of electric current. The vertical to e components of electric and gravimagnetic currents don’t change, but horizontal parts increase by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7503165x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and also tend to infinity.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Conclusion</title><p>The field of EGM charges-currents in the absence of external fields is called free field. In article [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref3">3</xref>] the author constructed analytical solutions of Equation (6.1) of a free field for charges-currents (F = 0). Using these decisions in relativistic formulae, it’s possible to consider as the electric and gravimagnetic charges and currents will be transformed at these transformations. In articles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76869-ref11">11</xref>] the author obtained the analytical solutions of a biquaternionic form of the generalized Dirac’s equation which presents special cases of the equation of transformation of charges-currents in the stationary uniform external EGM-field. These decisions can also be used in relativistic formulae. Analyzing these expressions, it is possible to receive the curious conclusions that we offer the interested reader.</p><p>The purpose of this article is the proof of invariance of A-field equations concerning group of Poincare-Lorentz transformations and creation of relativistic formulae. It means mathematical justifiability of this model and its adequacy to the existing physical ideas about matter, space, time.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Alexeyeva, L. (2017) Relativistic Formulae for the Biquaternionic Model of Electro-Gravimagnetic Charges and Currents. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.87066</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76869-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fyodorov, F.I. (1979) Group of Lorentz. Nauka, Moscow, 384 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poincaré, A. (1973) Poincare about Dynamics of an Electron. In: The Principle of Relativity, a Collection of Works of Relativity Classics, Atomizdat, Moscow, 90-93, 118-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexeyeva, L.A. (2016) Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 435-444. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.75045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexeyeva, L.A. (2016) Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 1351-1358. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.711121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexeyeva, L.A. (2003) Mathematical Journal, 4, 20-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexeyeva, L.A. (2003) Differential Equations, 6, 769-776.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexeyeva, L.A. (2012) Clifford Analysis, Clifford Algebras and Their Applications, 7, 19-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rastall, R. (1964) Review of Modern Physics, 36, 820-832.https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.36.820</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Acevedo, M., Lopez-Bonilla, J. and Sanchez-Meraz, M. (2005) Apeiron, 12, 371.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexeyeva, L.A. (2011) Mathematical Journal, 1, 30-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76869-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexeyeva, L.A. (2015) Hypercomplex Number in Geometry and Physics, 2, 127-134.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>