<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJCNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1913-3715</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijcns.2017.105B017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJCNS-76592</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Efficient Interference Mitigation in mmWave Backhaul Network for High Data Rate 5G Wireless Communications
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Shi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qiang</surname><given-names>Ni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Claudio</surname><given-names>Paoloni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Francois</surname><given-names>Magne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>When-AB S.A., Paris, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>05</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>170</fpage><lpage>180</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>23,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>May</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   This paper investigates the performance of the W band millimeter wave (mmWave) backhaul network proposed by our EU TWEETHER project. We focus on the downlink transmission of the mmWave backhaul network, in which each of the hubs serves a cluster of base stations (BSs). In the considered backhaul network, available frequency resources are first allocated to the downlink links with the consideration of fairness issue. In order to mitigate interference in the mmWave backhaul network, each hub operates the proposed algorithm, namely cooperation and power adaptation (CPA). Our simulation results show that, the backhaul network with mmWave capabilities can achieve a significant better throughput performance than the sub-6 GHz ultra high frequency (UHF) backhaul network. Furthermore, our simulations also reveal that the proposed CPA algorithm can efficiently combat interference in the backhaul network. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>mmWave Communication</kwd><kwd> Backhauling</kwd><kwd> Interference Mitigation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Traditional microwave based cellular networks are facing more and more challenges due to the exponential growth of data traffic. Shifting the communication spectrum from traditional microwave to millimeter wave (mmWave) is widely recognized as one of the best attractive solutions to future wireless communication networks demanding high-volume capacity. Moreover, mmWave small cell networks have been thought of as a promising approach to boost the coverage and rate of future cellular networks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref1">1</xref>]. However, it is important and challenging to design a backhaul network connecting to an explosive growing number of small BSs.</p><p>Wireless backhaul network with mmWave capabilities can be a promising candidate for future wireless communication systems, due to its advantages of high capacity, energy efficient, low transmission delay and low cost, etc. Most of the work about mmWave communication in the literature mainly focuses on channel modeling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref3">3</xref>], and its applicability for indoor/outdoor environment over traditional cellular networks in terms of the coverage and rate probabilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref4">4</xref>]. By contrast, limited studies, such as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref8">8</xref>], have investigated mmWave backhaul networks. The authors in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref6">6</xref>] have studied the resource allocation in heterogeneous backhaul network which consists of both wired fiber and mmWave wireless communications. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref6">6</xref>], the authors have investigated the heterogeneous backhaul network’s performance in terms of packet delay, and have also shown the new backhaul technologies over the traditional wired only technologies. Recently, the authors in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref5">5</xref>] have studied joint scheduling of radio access and mmWave and fiber backhaul in hybrid heterogeneous network with the capabilities of device-to-device transmissions. By contrast, the authors in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref8">8</xref>] have investigated mmWave only backhaul networks. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref7">7</xref>], they have only addressed energy consumption issue for a renewable energy powered mmWave backhaul network, and a Stackelberg game based pricing scheme is proposed to manage the traffic latency over the backhaul network. Massive MIMO aided mmWave backhaul network has been addressed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref8">8</xref>], where the hybrid preceding and combining scheme is proposed.</p><p>Against this background, in this paper, we investigate the performance of the W band mmWave backhaul network proposed by our EU TWEETHER project [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref10">10</xref>]. We focus on the downlink transmission of the mmWave backhaul network, in which each of the hubs serves a cluster of base stations (BSs). In the considered backhaul network, the available frequency resources are allocated to the downlink links based on the greedy algorithm with the consideration of fairness issue. In order to mitigate interference in the mmWave backhaul network, each hub operates the proposed algorithm, namely cooperation and power adaptation (CPA). The proposed CPA algorithm can set up cooperative transmissions for the poor links; meanwhile, it also utilizes the strategy of power adaptation to reduce the strong interference generated by the links. A range of simulation results including the outage probability and sum rate are provided to evaluate the performance of the mmWave backhaul network. Our simulation results show that, our backhaul network with mmWave capabilities can significantly outperform the sub-6 GHz ultra high frequency (UHF) backhaul network in terms of the outage probability performance. Furthermore, our simulations also reveal that the proposed CPA algorithm can efficiently combat interference in the backhaul network.</p><p>The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides the system model and states the main assumptions. Section 3 describes the subband allocation method. Section 4 proposes the interference mitigation schemes. Section 5 demonstrates the performance results. Finally, Section 6 summarizes the conclusions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. System Models</title><p>Our project, namely EU TWEETHER, proposes novel W band mmWave based heterogeneous wireless networks with high data rate distribution, spectrum- and energy-efficiency. The conceptual structure of the proposed network is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The network model proposed by EU TWEETHER consists of three tiers, which are infrastructure tier, backhaul tier and access tier. More specifically, in infrastructure tier, we can set up several terabits data links via fiber optics for the communications between the data centers and the point of presences (PoP) nodes over hundreds of kilometers. In backhaul tier, the W band mm Wave backhaul links are established for the communication between the PoP hub nodes and multiple BSs in access tier. Finally, access tier supports the communication from BSs to user terminals, where we apply sub-6GHz UHF communication links. In this paper, we will focus on investigating the achievable rate performance of the mmWave backhaul tier proposed by our EU TWEETHER project.</p><p>In this paper, we consider the downlink transmission of the mmWave backhaul network, which consists of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> hubs and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> BSs. In order to capture the main characteristics of the network proposed by our EU TWEETHER project, we assume that, any two hubs are separated by a distance of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> km, and the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> BSs are uniformly distributed in the network. Furthermore, we also assume that the distance of a backhaul link is in the range of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and any two BSs are separated by a distance of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> km. The mmWave backhaul transmissions in the network experience both the pathloss effects and the small-scale fading. To model pathloss effects including shadowing for a mmWave link, we employ the model of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76592-ref11">11</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula171"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula172"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A mmWave communication link is assumed to be non-line-of-sight (NLoS) if the line segment joining the mmWave BS and the user is blocked by buildings.</p><p>Otherwise, the link is thought of as line-of-sight (LoS). In (2), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the car-</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Conceptual network structure proposed by EU TWEETHER project</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x11.png"/></fig><p>rier frequency at the mmWave frequency band, and d represents the distance of a link. Furthermore, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the pathloss exponents for LoS and NLoS cases respectively. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are shadowing effects, which are assumed to follow zero mean log normal distribution. We define the LoS probability of a mmWave link as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is a decreasing function of the length of the communication link, and hence, the NLoS probability of a mmWave link is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. When a link becomes longer, it has a higher probability of being a NLoS link. Note that, the probability <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be characterized by blockage models according to various communication environments.</p><p>For the sake of theoretical study, we deploy the sectored antenna model to characterize the practical array patterns. Let us denote <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as the sectored antenna patterns for a hub and a BS respectively.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the main lobe directivity gains, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the back lobe directivity gains, while <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the beamwidths of the antennas. Let the bore sight directions be <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which are assumed to be 0. For simplicity, we assume the antenna gain for a desired signal link is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. However, each link may also have some interference links, and the antenna gain for an interference link is denoted as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which can be given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula173"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In (3), we assume the beamwidth of an antenna, such as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, are independently and uniformly distributed in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In our mmWave backhaul network, each hub is able to transmit information to its serving BSs by using all spectrum of B Hz available in W band. Furthermore, we assume a hub communicates with its serving BSs based on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) employing M subbands. Hence, in the downlink transmission of the backhaul network, the achievable rate of a BS served by its hub on a subband can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula174"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In (4), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the bandwidth of subband m. We define <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> includes the indexes of hubs. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>contains the indexes of the BSs served by</p><p>hub j, hence, we have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>includes the indexes of M</p><p>subbands available in the network. In (4), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the signal-to-interference- plus-noise rate (SINR) of BS n served by hub j on subband m, and it is defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula175"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In (5), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the transmission power of hub j on subband m, and the transmission power for all subchannels are assumed to be the same. In addition to the large-scale fading effect, each communication link also experiences the small-scale fading, such as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is the independent Rayleigh fading channel between hub j and BS n on subband m. Furthermore, we assume that all the communication links have the same noise power, which is denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (5). Note that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (5) is the interference power that suffered by the transmission from hub j to BS n.</p><p>In the considered mmWave backhaul network, each hub first needs to assign the available spectrum resource to the its serving BSs, in other word, each hub is required to allocate the M number of subbands available to its BSs. However, the transmissions in the network will suffer from the interference generated by their co-subband links. Therefore, after subband allocation, we operate the proposed interference mitigation algorithm for the links suffering strong interference in order to improve the network’s throughput performance. Let us now first discuss the subband allocation.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Subband Allocation</title><p>As mentioned in Section 2, a hub is assumed to employ all the available frequency bands to communicate with its serving BSs based on OFDM scheme. Therefore, hub j needs to allocate M subbands to its <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> number of BSs, aiming to maximize the sum rate of the backhaul links.</p><p>In order to achieve the best trade-off between the performance and implementation complexity, each hub employs the greedy algorithm for subband allocation. In this paper, for simplicity and without loss of generality, the number of subbands available is larger than the number of BSs served by each hub, i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Based on the greedy algorithm, each hub allocates the M subbands in M iterations, in which during each a iteration the best available subband is assigned. Meanwhile, to achieve the best fairness of allocation, our allocation motivates to allocate each BS the same number of subbands. In this case, the subband allocation during a iteration can be described as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula176"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula177"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> includes the indexes of the subbands assigned to BS n served by hub j. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>contains the indexes of the BSs having the least number of subbands assigned. In this way, our subband allocation can ensure the best fairness in terms of allocation. After the subband allocation, the links using the same subband will cause interference to each other. Hence, the SINR of a communication link, such as the SINR in (5) for BS n of hub j on subband m, becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula178"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given in (3). Known from (8), the through-put performance of the network may be significantly degraded by a communication link experiencing strong interference. To improve the network’s performance, we need to operate interference mitigation to remove strong interference.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Interference Mitigation</title><p>For the sake of improving throughput performance of our mmWave backhaul network, in this section we propose a novel interference mitigation scheme, namely cooperation and power adaptation (CPA).</p><p>After the subband allocation discussed in Section 3, a desired communication link may suffer from strong interference imposed by other links using the same subband. Hence, the CPA algorithm is operated for the poor links, which either experience strong interference from their co-subband links, or generating strong interference to their co-subband links. Let us denote the set of the poor backhaul communication links on subband m as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula179"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula180"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula181"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the signal-to-interference (SIR) threshold. In (9)-(11), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the SIR of the link, and it can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula182"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given in (8).</p><p>The proposed CPA algorithm utilizes BS cooperation to mitigate interference in the backhaul network, in which the space time block coding (STBC) aided cooperative transmission can be established for the poor links. When the cooperation for the transmission to BS n is set up by hub j and hub q, the SINR in (8) for the link becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula183"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Known from (13), the achievable data rate of BS n can be significantly improved when the interference <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> imposed by hub q is strong. In addition to cooperation, our CPA algorithm also employs the strategy of power adaptation. In that case, if a link suffers from strong interference, a hub may reduce the transmit power for the links, while guaranteeing the minimum service quality of the link over a range of at least 1 km. By doing this, the links powered down will not cause strong interference to other links, and hence, the sum rate of the backhaul network will be improved. In this paper, our CPA algorithm aims to maximize the sum rate of the poor links, which can be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76592-formula184"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> contains the interference mitigation strategies. Specifically, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>means hub j transmits information with the power <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to BS n on subband m. By contrast, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>means that hub j transmits information to BS n on subband m with the reduced power<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Note that, the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is related to the minimum data rate requirement and the minimum transmission range, which can be set up according to network requirements. Furthermore, in order to minimize the signaling burden, the hubs are only required to exchange binary interference information. For example, the binary interference information for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (13) can be defined by: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(strong interference) if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, otherwise <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (small interference), where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the interference threshold.</p><p>Based on the optimization problem in (14), the principles of our CPA algorithm can be given as follows.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Performance Results</title><p>In this section, we provide a range of simulation results for demonstrating the achievable performance including the outage probability and sum rate of our backhaul network with the aid of W band mmWave communication. Specifically, we also evaluate the performance of the proposed CPA algorithm in terms of mitigating interference in the network. For the sake of theoretical study, we assume that there are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> hubs in the network, and for all simulations, the number of subbands is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Furthermore, we assume that the noise power of each link is assumed to be the same, which is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The other simulation parameters are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, we investigate the outage probability performance of the mmWave backhaul (BH) network, which is compared with the performance of the sub-6 GHz UHF only backhaul network. The outage probability is defined as the probability that the links in the network achieve the data rates below the minimum rate requirement<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For the UHF only backhaul network, we assume that the available bandwidth is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> MHz and the carrier frequency is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> GHz. Without loss of generality, the other assumptions are the same as those for the mmWave backhaul network. Observed from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Simulation parameters for mmWave backhaul network</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 GHz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−174 dBm/Hz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94 GHz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 dBm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 dB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 dB</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10 dB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10 dB</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0 dB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6 dB</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>mmWave backhaul network can significantly outperform the UHF network in all different minimum rate requirement scenarios. As shown, with the aid of the proposed CPA algorithm, the mmWave backhaul network can achieve a better outage probability performance, and a bigger performance gap can be observed in the range of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Furthermore, when the SIR threshold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gets higher, the CPA algorithm can assist the network to achieve a higher performance. This is because the CPA algorithm operates interference mitigation for a larger number of communication links in the network.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, we show the outage probability of the mmWave backhaul net- work with and without employing the proposed CPA algorithm, when considering the different BS densities. First of all, we can see that, when the number of BSs gets bigger, the outage probability of the network gets higher. This observation implies that the backhaul communication links have higher probabilities of experiencing strong interference as the density of BSs served by the network increases. Second, our proposed CPA algorithm can significantly facilitate the network by efficiently mitigating interference. The performance gain of employing the CPA stays roughly the same for all different BS density scenarios. At last, once again, we observe that the outage probability becomes smaller as the SIR threshold gets bigger, in which more links are benefited from the CPA algorithm.</p><p>Finally, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the effect of the thresholds <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the performance of the CPA algorithm. In the figure, we once more shows the significant performance improvement of the mmWave backhaul network by using the CPA to combat interference. As shown, the sum rate of the poor links increases as the SIR threshold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or the interference threshold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases. This is because the CPA operates interference mitigation for more number of the poor links as the number of the poor links increases. However, in this case, it also</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Outage probability of the backhaul networks, when employing various values of <img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x101.png" /></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x100.png"/></fig><p>requires higher implementation complexity and cost. Therefore, it is important to choose proper SIR and ICI thresholds by jointly considering the system requirement, implementation complexity as well as desirable performance. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, we can conclude that, the proposed CPA algorithm can facilitate our mmWave back-haul network to achieve a better performance.</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Outage probability of the W band mmWave backhaul networks having different densities of BSs, when assuming <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Gbps</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x102.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Sum rate of the poor links in the W band mmWave backhaul network employing the CPA algorithm under the various SIR threshold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and ICI threshold<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/76592x104.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we have investigated the performance of the W band mmWave backhaul network proposed by our EU TWEETHER project. In order to improve the network’s throughput performance, we have proposed the CPA algorithm to mitigate interference in the mmWave backhaul network. When the CPA algorithm is employed, the hubs are allowed to set up cooperative transmissions for the poor links, alternatively, the hubs are required to reduce the transmission power for some links that generate strong interference to other links. We have provided a range of simulation results including the outage probability and sum rate of the backhaul network. Our simulations have shown that, our mmWave backhaul network can significantly outperform the UHF backhaul network. Furthermore, our simulations have also implied that the proposed CPA algorithm can efficiently combat interference so that the backhaul network achieves a clear better performance. We conclude that the proposed CPA algorithm can be thought of as a promising solution for interference mitigation in our mmWave backhaul network.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work is supported by EU H2020 TWEETHER project under grant agreement number 644678.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shi, J., Ni, Q., Paoloni, C. and Magne, F. (2017) Efficient Interference Mitigation in mmWave Backhaul Network for High Data Rate 5G Wireless Communications. Int. J. Communications, Network and System Sciences, 10, 170-180. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcns.2017.105B017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76592-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grillo, G., Andrews, J., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S., Lozano, A., Soong, A. and Zhang, J. (2014) What Will 5G Be? IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 32, 1065-1082. 
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2014.2328098</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rappaport, T., et al. (2013) Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellu-lar: It Will Work! IEEE Access, 1, 335-349. 
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2260813</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ragan, S., Rappaport, T.S. and Erkip, E. (2014) Milimeter-Wave Cellular Wireless Networks: Potentials and Challenges. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102, 366-385. 
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2014.2299397</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bai, T. and Heath, R. (2015) Coverage and Rate Analysis for Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 14, 1100-1114. 
https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2014.2364267</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niu, Y., Gao, C., Li, Y., Su, L., Jin, D. and Vasilakos, A.V. (2015) Exploiting Device-to-Device Communications in Joint Scheduling of Access and Backhaul for mmWave Small Cells. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Com-mun., 33, 2052-2069. 
https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2014.2364267</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G., Quek, T.Q.S., Kountouris, M., Huang, A. and Shan, H. (2016) Funda-mentals of Heterogeneous Backhaul Design—Analysis and Optimization. IEEE Trans. Commun., 64, 876-889. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2515596</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, D., Saad, W. and Hong, C.S. (2016) Decentralized Renewable Energy Pricing and Allocation for Millimeter Wave Cellular Backhaul. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 34, 1140-1159. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2016.2520249</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, Z., Dai, L., Mi, D., Wang, Z., Imran, M.A. and Shakir, M.Z. (2015) MmWave Massive-MIMO-Based Wireless Backhaul for the 5G Ultra-Dense Network. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2015.7306533</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EU TWEETHER Project Website. https://tweether.eu/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paoloni, C., Letizia, R., Napoli, F., Ni, Q., Rennie, A., Zimmerman, R., Andre, F., Pham, K., Krozer, V., Magne, F., Burciu, I., Ramirez, A., Rocchi, M., Marilier, M. and Vilar, R. (2015) Horizon 2020 TWEETHER Project for W-Band High Data Rate Wireless Communications. IEEE 16th International Vacuum Electronics Conference (IVEC 2015), April 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ivec.2015.7223770</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76592-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, X., Saad, W., Zhang, X., Xu, X. and Zhou, S. (2015) Joint Deployment of Small Cells and Wireless Backhaul Links in Next-Generation Networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 19, 2250-2253. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2494022</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>