<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2017.86092</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-76464</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Nitrogen Management of Diverse Sunflower (&lt;i&gt;Helianthus annus&lt;/i&gt; L.) Hybrids Production under Agro-Climatic Conditions of Sargodha, Pakistan
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Irfan Ahmad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amjed</surname><given-names>Ali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aaqil</surname><given-names>Khan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alam</surname><given-names>Sher</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arif</surname><given-names>Rashid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sikandar</surname><given-names>Ali Jamro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shafeeq</surname><given-names>ur-Rahman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saboor</surname><given-names>Ahmad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Public Health Pest Laboratory (PHPL) of Jeddah Governorate, Jeddah, KSA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Agriculture Water and Soil Environment Field Science Research Station of Xinxiang, Xinxiang, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Crop Biotechnology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>05</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>1357</fpage><lpage>1367</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>23,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>May</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A field study was carried out with the objective to determine the effect of various levels of nitrogen on growth, development, yield and yield components of different sunflower (
  &lt;i&gt;
  Helianthus annuus
  &lt;/i&gt;
   
  L.) hybrids 
  &lt;i&gt;
  i.e
  &lt;/i&gt;
  .
   Hysun-33 and S-78 were evaluated under agro-climatic conditions of Sargodha, Pakistan during spring 2013. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with split plot arrangement having three replications, keeping cultivars in the main plots and N levels in the subplots. The net plot size was 4.2 m 
  &#215;
   6 m. The growth parameters such are leaf area, leaf area duration and yield parameters were observed are Days to a thesis, Days to maturity, head diameter (cm), No. of achene’s per head, Achene yield (kg&amp;#183ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
  ) and total dry matter (kg). The results showed that increasing the nitrogen rate also increased the No. of achene’s per head, Achene yield (kg&amp;#183ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
  ) and total dry matter (kg) in S-78 hybrid where the nitrogen application rate was 180 kg&amp;#183ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
   as compared to Hysun-33 cultivar.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sunflower</kwd><kwd> Nitrogen</kwd><kwd> Growth and Yield</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an important oilseed crop which ranks 3rd after soybean and peanut along with other oil seed crop like (canola, and cotton) which contributes considerably to edible oil in the world (Thavaprakash et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref1">1</xref>] ). In Pakistan, sunflower occupies an important place in oil seed crops because of short duration, having ability to adapt wide range of climate and soil conditions (Thavaprakash et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref2">2</xref>] ). Although, this crop has ideal place in the present cropping system but due to some constraints the average yield is much lower than world’s average. The low productivity is mainly due to poor fertility of soils, lack of proper production technology, unavailability of inputs, and marketing problems (Anwar-ul-Haq et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref3">3</xref>] ; Arshad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref4">4</xref>] ).</p><p>There are various factors responsible for obtaining the higher yield of sunflower such as nitrogen fertilizer is consider an essential nutrient play an imperative role in maximization of crop yields (Massignam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref5">5</xref>] ) and improves the yield as well as quality of all crops (Dreccer et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref6">6</xref>] ; Ullah et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref7">7</xref>] ). Additionally, higher rates of N increase photosynthetic processes, leaf area production, leaf area duration as well as net assimilation rate (Ahmad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref8">8</xref>] ; Munir, et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref9">9</xref>] ). The increase the individual leaf area and total leaf area of crop plants are helpful to increase the grain yield(Cheema et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref10">10</xref>] ; Tsialtas and Maslaris [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref11">11</xref>] ; Rafiq et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref12">12</xref>] ). Many researchers (Miralles et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref13">13</xref>] ; Bange [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref14">14</xref>] ) concluded that N increases grain yield by affecting the growth and development of sunflower. In Pakistan cultivation of exotic sunflower hybrids are not good for better yield because these are not well adapted to our agro climatic conditions. Therefore, introduction of such hybrids which are early maturating, having high oil contents and producing high seed yield under summer temperature and drought conditions (Bakht et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref15">15</xref>] ). There is lack of advanced production technology and farmers are facing acute problems in growing sunflower crop in Pakistan. Therefore the present study was conducted with the objective to evaluate the effect of different nitrogen rates on growth, grain yield of different sunflower hybrids under ecological conditions of Sargodha, Punjab-Pakistan.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Experimental Site and Soil</title><p>The experiment was conducted at the Agronomic Research Area of, University of Sargodha (32˚05''N, 72˚67''E), Pakistan during the spring seasons of 2013. The soil is sandy clay loamy somewhat poorly drained with pH ranging from 7.9 - 7.33. The nitrogen level was 0.066 to 0.052 are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Design and Treatments</title><p>The experiment was set in a Split plot arrangement under RCBD having 3 replications. The net plot size was 4.2 m &#215; 6 m having row to row spacing 70 cm and plant to plant distance 20 cm. Sunflower hybrids (Hysun-33, S-278) were kept in main plots and N levels (0, 45, 90,135 and 180 kg/ha) in sub plots. The crop was sown by dibbler method using seed rate of 5 kg/ha. Phosphorus and potash were applied at the rate of 80 - 40 kg/ha in all plots. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and potassium were used in the form of urea, DAP and Potassium (K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>). The nitrogen</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Physico-chemical soil analysis of crop area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Characteristic</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Soil sample depth</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Soil pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Organic Matter (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total Nitrogen (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.061</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Available P (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Available K (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sandy loam</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sandy loam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sandy loam</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>was used in three splits, 1/3 dose of nitrogen and all of the phosphorous and potash fertilizer were applied at the time of sowing. Remaining 2/3 of nitrogen was used in two splits, at first irrigation and flowering stage. All other agronomic practices such as hoeing, weeding, irrigation and plant protection measure were kept normal for the crop.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Plant Sampling and Measurements</title><p>A sample of 5 plants were selected randomly from each plots for measuring growth parameters such as leaf area index, leaf area duration. At final harvest 10 plants fortnightly were selected form each plots for measurement of days to maturity, number of achene’s per head, 1000-achene weight(g), achene’s yields (kg/ha) and total dry matter (kg). First growth sampling was conducted after 15 days of sowing, then each sampling every 10 days interval. The leaf area was measured from 10 g fresh leaves from harvested material from each fifteen days interval. An area meter (CI 202. Portable Laser Leaf Area Meter) was used for the measurement of leaf area.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data collected on growth and yield components was analyzed statistically by employing the Fisher’s analysis of variance technique and significant of treatment means was tested using least significance difference (LSD) test at 5% probability level (Steel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref16">16</xref>] ) Calculating Root Mean Square error Value (RMSE) i.e. Residual variation among observed and stimulated data tested accuracy of model.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Growth Parameters</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Leaf Area Index (LAI)</title><p>Leaf area index is the ratio of leaf area per unit land area. It is unit less quantity due to ratio of same units. Greater the leaf area index, increase the capability of plants to harvest the solar energy and converted into chemical energy. The two sunflower hybrids were statistically different from each other, maximum leaf area index (3.88) was observed in hybrid Hysun-33 as compared to S-78 (3.62) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Same results are reported by (Kho [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref17">17</xref>] ; Aleman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref18">18</xref>] ). Leaf area index was significantly increased ranging 3.05 to 4.52 with higher supply of nitrogen fertilizer from 0 to 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> respectively. The application of nitrogen 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> attained the highest leaf area index (4.52), followed by N<sub>4</sub> (135 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) treatment 4.26. The leaf area index (3.05) was achieved without use of nitrogen fertilizer and it was statistically at par with the plot where nitrogen was applied at the rate 45 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> (3.23). These findings were in close conformity with result of Nasim et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref19">19</xref>] ) who reported that increase leaf area index with enhancing the nitrogen levels. The statistically significant results were also observed during the interaction between hybrids and different nitrogen levels as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, nitrogen application 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> in hybrid Hysun-33 attained maximum leaf area index (4.76) statistically at par with same application level of S-78 (4.27). The lowest leaf area index (2.95) was recorded where no application of nitrogen fertilizer.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> represents that leaf area index significantly affected by different nitrogen levels with hybrid Hysun-33. In all nitrogen treated plots LAI was enhanced with increasing the nitrogen levels. Maximum leaf area index (4.7) was attained by hybrid Hysun-33 with nitrogen level of 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> on 70 days and lowest (3.2) was recorded in control treatment. The leaf area index was increased in all fertilized nitrogen treated plots by applying of various levels with S-78 hybrid was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Show that highest leaf area index (4.4) was achieved by hybrid S-78 with nitrogen level of 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> on 70 days and lowest (2.95) was noted in treatment where no nitrogen was applied.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Leaf Area Duration (Days)</title><p>Data reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> demonstrated that Leaf area duration was statistically significant for different hybrids. The maximum leaf area duration (172.47) was</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of hybrids and nitrogen levels on LAI. LAD. DA. DM. HD. NAH. AY and TDM</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L.A.I</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L.A.D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D.A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D.M</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H.D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N.A.H</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.Y</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T.D.M</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>1</sub> = Hysum-33<sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.47 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.93 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.07a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.25 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >917.3 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3464.4 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9747.2 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub> = S-78<sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.0 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.86 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.98 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1054.9 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3714.8 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8593.7 b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tukey HSD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >594.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen Levels</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L.A.I</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L.A.D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D.A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D.M</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H.D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N.A.H</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.Y</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T.D.M</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.Y</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T.D.M</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>1</sub> = 0 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup><sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.055d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.75 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.50d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.17c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.06c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >767.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3067.8c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7645c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3067.8c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7645c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>2</sub> = 45 kgha<sup>−1</sup><sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.236d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.98d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.33cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.83bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.18c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >887.5bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3242.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8103c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3242.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8103c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>3</sub> = 90 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup><sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.686c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.73c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.33bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.67b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.18b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >954.7b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3652.5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9140b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3652.5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9140b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>4</sub> = 135kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup><sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.266b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187.40b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.33ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.67a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.15a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1121.8a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3970.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10310a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3970.2a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10310a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>5</sub> = 180kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup><sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.521a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.33a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.50a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.67a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.01a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1199.2a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4015.0a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10655a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4015.0a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10655a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tukey HSD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >803.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >803.59</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of nitrogen on leaf area index of Hysun-33</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-2603159x2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of nitrogen on leaf area index of S-78</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-2603159x3.png"/></fig><p>recorded in Hysun-33 as compared to S-78 hybrid (154). Applying different levels of nitrogen fertilizer, the maximum leaf area duration (198.33) was observed in N<sub>5</sub> treatment (180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), followed (187.40) by the Treatment N<sub>4</sub> (135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>). However, the minimum leaf area duration (127.75) was recorded in control plots. These results are in close agreement with the finding of and also was same results (Albrizio et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref20">20</xref>] ) who concluded that leaf area duration was increase by enhancing the nitrogen application level.</p><p>The interaction between hybrids and nitrogen application affecting the leaf area duration was significant as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Maximum leaf area duration (212.83) was noted in H<sub>1</sub>N<sub>5</sub> combination which was followed by same hybrid at nitrogen level of 135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> having LAD of 198.15. Hybrid S-78 attained maximum leaf area duration (183.83) at rate of nitrogen 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> which was statistically at par with nitrogen level 135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> of same hybrid achieved LAD 176.65.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Interaction between hybrids and nitrogen levels affecting the LIA. LAD. D M. HD. NAH. AY and TDM</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L.A.I</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L.A.D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D.M</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H.D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N.A.H</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A.Y</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T.D.M</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>1</sub>N<sub>1 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.16ef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.15fg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.00d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.80f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >839.7de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2923.7e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7771de</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>1</sub>N<sub>2 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.37def</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149.08e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.67cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.76ef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >841.3de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3078.7de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8530cde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>1</sub>N<sub>3 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169.15d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.00bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.43de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >867.cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3500bcn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9726abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>1</sub>N<sub>4 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.15b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.67ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.46cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >960.3bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3884.7a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11123ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>1</sub>N<sub>5 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.83a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.80cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1077.7b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3935a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11586a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>1 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.95f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.35 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.33 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.33cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >695.3e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3212cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7519e</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.88f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.00fg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.60bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >933.7bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3406cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7676de</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>3 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152.30e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.33fg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.93b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1041.7bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3805ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8555cde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>4 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.13bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176.65cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.67ef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.83a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1283.3a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4055.7a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9496bcd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>5 </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183.83c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.33e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.23a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1320.7a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4095a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9723abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tukey HSD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2358.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Mean having different letters differ significantly from each other by Tukey HSD (P = 0.05).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Yield Parameters</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Days to Anthesis (R.5.3 Stage)</title><p>The penology of crop plants is an important yield contributing parameter. The different sunflower hybrids have taken varying number of days to anthesis (R.5.3) stage. Hybrid hysun-33 took more days to R.5.3 stage (70 days) as compared to S-78 hybrid (59 days) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Difference for days to anthesis among hybrids was also observed by (Akhtar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref21">21</xref>] ; Nasim [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref22">22</xref>] ; Ali et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref23">23</xref>] ). In all the treated plots with nitrogen, days to anthesis were significantly different over control. The 180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> application significantly increases days for anthesis than 135, 90, 45, 0 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. Nitrogen levels at the rate of 135, 90, 45 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> took 65, 64.16, 63.33 days for completion of 80 % anthesis which were statistically at par with each other. These results are supported by the findings of (Sadras [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref24">24</xref>] ; Cechin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref25">25</xref>] ). The interaction between hybrids and nitrogen levels for R.5.3 stage was non-significant.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Days to Maturity (R.9 Stage)</title><p>The maturity of plant plays important role for obtaining the highest yield of crop. Data (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) indicate that plant maturity was significantly affected by different hybrids and nitrogen levels. The two sunflower hybrids were statistically different from each other. Hysun-33 taken more days to maturity (120 Days) as compared to S-78 (102 days). The similar result was observed from (Bakht et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref15">15</xref>] ; Bakht et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref26">26</xref>] ). The plant maturity was enhanced by different levels of nitrogen fertilizer application. The 180 and 135 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> showed at par effect on days to plant maturity. The lowest number of days for R. 9 was recorded in control plot. These results are close agreement with (Bakht et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref15">15</xref>] ) also observed that plant maturity was enhance with increasing the nitrogen rates. The statistically significant results were observed during the interaction between hybrids and varying nitrogen rates. The data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed that more no of days (123) was required to plant maturity in hybrid Hysun-33 with treatment level of 180 kg Nha<sup>−1</sup> at par with 135 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> (121). The S-78 hybrid was observed in treatment H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>5</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>4</sub> with nitrogen level of 180 and 135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>, required days 105 and 103 respectively. These are statistically at par with each other.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Head Diameter (cm)</title><p>Head diameter is an important character indicating the plant yield. Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents that head diameter was significantly affected by different sunflower hybrids as well as different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. The hybrid S-78 produced significantly greater size of head diameter (21 cm) as compared to Hysun-33 (16 cm).Head diameter was enlarged with increasing the rates of fertilizer from 0 to 180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. The maximum size of head diameter (22 cm) was recorded in treatment N<sub>5</sub> (180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) and it is statistically at par with nitrogen rate of 135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>The lowest head diameter (16 cm) was noted in treatment N<sub>1</sub> the control plots. The statistically significant results were also observed during the interaction between hybrids and different nitrogen levels. The data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> exhibited that highest head diameter 25 cm and 20 cm of S-78 hybrid was observed in treatment H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>5</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>4</sub> with nitrogen level of 180 and 135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The Hysun-33 hybrid with same level of Nitrogen 180 and 135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> produced smaller head diameter of 18 cm and 17cm respectively, which was statistically at par with the control treatment of S-78. These results are supported by the findings of Khaliq and Cheema [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref27">27</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Number of Achene’s Per Head</title><p>The data regarding number of achene’s per head is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> exhibited that hybrid S-78 produced more numbers of achene per head (1054) as compared to Hysun-33 (917) which were statistically different from each other. Number of achenes per head was significantly increased with higher nitrogen fertilizer rates. The application of 180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> produced highest number of achenes per head (1199) and it is statistically at par with the plot where nitrogen was applied at the rate 135 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>. The lesser number of achenes per head (767) was recorded in control treatment. The interaction between hybrids Hysun-33 and S-78 with varying levels of nitrogen was significant. Results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> revealed that highest number of achenes per head (1320) was noted in treatments N<sub>5</sub> (180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) and N<sub>4</sub> (135 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>), respectively, in S-78 hybrid. The same treatment N<sub>4</sub> (135 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) for Hysun-33 produced 960 number of achenes per head which was statistically at par with the application of nitrogen fertilizer 45 Kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> of hybrid S-78. These results are supported by the findings of (Nazir et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref28">28</xref>] ; Akhtar and Malik. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref29">29</xref>] ) who concluded that interaction between hybrids and nitrogen application was significant.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Achene Yield (kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</title><p>The most essential parameter is achene yield in sunflower crop and number of components are included for obtaining the highest yield are, head diameter, number of achenes per head and 1000 achene weight. The statistically significant results were observed between hybrids as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The hybrid S-78 produced higher achene yield (3714 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) than Hysun-33 (3464 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>). The data (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) indicated that increased nitrogen levels promote the achene yield significantly. Among the nitrogen levels N<sub>5</sub> (180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) produced significantly higher achene yield (4015 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>), which was statistically at par with N<sub>4</sub> treatment where the yield obtained was 3970 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>. However, the lowest achene yield (3067 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) was recorded in control treatment.</p><p>The interaction of hybrids and nitrogen application was found to be significant in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Maximum achene yield (4095 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) was noted in H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>5</sub> combination which was statistically at par with H<sub>1</sub>N<sub>4</sub> (3884 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) and H<sub>2</sub>N<sub>4</sub> (4055 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>). The lowest achene yield was noted in hybrid Hysun-33 (2923) without application of nitrogen fertilizer. These results are in close agreement with the finding of (Khaliq and Cheema. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref28">28</xref>] ; Akhtar and Malik. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref29">29</xref>] ; Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref30">30</xref>] who concluded that interaction was significant between hybrids and nitrogen application.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Total Dry Matter (kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</title><p>The data (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) depict that total dry matter was significantly affected by different hybrids and applying of various nitrogen fertilizer levels. The total dry matter production of Hysun-33 hybrid was more (9747 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) as compared with S-78 (8593 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>). As regards of different nitrogen fertilizer application levels, total dry matter production in all the fertilized plots was significantly higher than treatment receiving no fertilizer. The highest rate of nitrogen fertilizer (180 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) showed the greatest total dry matter 10655 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> however this rate of nitrogen fertilizer was statistically in par with 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. The plots was treated with nitrogen level 0 and 45 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> produced total dry matter (6745 and 8103 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) respectively, which was statistically at par with each other.</p><p>The statistically significant interaction was observed between hybrids Hysun-33 and S-78 with varying levels of nitrogen affecting the total dry matter. The data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> concluded that Hysun-33 at 90 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> produced total dry matter (9726 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>), which was statistically in par with hybrid S-78 (9723 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) at application of nitrogen level 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>. The highest total dry matter (11586 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) noted in hybrid Hysun-33 with nitrogen application of 180 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> as well as lowest total dry matter was obtained from S-78 with least application of nitrogen fertilizer (control). The results are close with finding of (Nasim et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76464-ref20">20</xref>] ) who reported a significant interaction was between hybrids and nitrogen application. There was positive and strong liner relationship between total dry matter and achene yield with value of (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.41) shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between Achene yield kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> and Total dry matter kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-2603159x4.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The comparison of the different sunflower hybrids with varying nitrogen levels was evaluated for sunflower crop and it was concluded that N4 treatment (135 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) with hybrid S-78 gave higher achene yield as compared to other nitrogen rates. Hence it is recommended that for maximum benefits, sunflower should be fertilized at 135 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I express gratitude to my worthy supervisor Dr. Amjed Ali Assistant Professor Department of Agronomy, University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha for his keen and potential interest, valuable suggestions, consistent encouragement, dynamic supervision and sympathetic attitude throughout the course of my studies, research endeavor and in these completions.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ahmad, M.I., Ali, A., Khan, A., Sher, A., Rashid, A., Jamro, S.A., ur-Rahman, S. and Ahmad, S. (2017) Nitrogen Management of Diverse Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) Hybrids Production under Agro-Climatic Conditions of Sargodha, Pakistan. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 1357-1367. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.86092</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76464-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thavaprakash, N., Siva Kumar, S.D., Raja, K. and Senthil Kumar, G. (2002) Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Levels and Ratios on Seed Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Sunflower Hybrid. Dsh-I. Helia, 25, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.2298/HEL0237059T</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thavaprakash, N., Senthilkumar, G., Sivakumar, S.D. and Raju, M. (2003) Photosynthetic Attributes and Seed Yield of Sunflower as Influenced by Different Levels and Ratios of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Fertilizers. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 51, 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.51.2003.2.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anwar-ul-Haq, A., Rashid, M.A., Butt, M.A., Akhter, A.M. and Saeed, A. (2006) Evaluation of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Hybrids for Yield and Yield Components in Central Punjab. Journal of Agricultural Research, 44, 277-285.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arshad, M., Ilyas, M. and Khan, M.A. (2009) Genetic Divergence and Path Coefficient Analysis for Seed Yield Traits in Sunflower Hybrids. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39, 2009-2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Massignam, A.M., Chapman, S.C., Hammer, G.L. and Fukai, S. (2009) Physiological Determinants of Maize and Sunflower Achene Yield as Affected by Nitrogen Supply. Field Crops Research, 113, 256-267.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dreccer, M.F., Schapendonk, A.H.C.M., Slafer, G.A. and Rabbinge, R. (2000) Comparative Response of Wheat and Oilseed Rape to Nitrogen Supply: Absorption and Utilization Efficiency of Radiation and Nitrogen during the Reproductive Stages Determining Yield. Plant and Soil, 220, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004757124939</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ullah, M.A., Anwar, M. and Rana, A.S. (2010) Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization and Harvesting Intervals on the Yield and Forage Quality of Elephant Gass (Pennisetum purpureum) under Mesic Climate of Pothowar Plateau. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture Science, 231-234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, S., Ahmad, R., Ashraf, M.Y., Ashraf, M. and Waraich, E.A. (2009) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Response to Drought Stress at Germination and Seedling Growth Stages. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41, 647-654.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Munir, M.A., Malik, M.A. and Saleem, M.F. (2007) Impact of Integration of Crop Manuring and Nitrogen Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Spring Planted Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39, 441-449.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheema, M.A., Malik, M.A., Hussain, A., Shah, S.H. and Basra, S.M.A. (2001) Effects of Time and Rate of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application on the Growth and the Seed and Oil Yields of Canola (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 186, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00463.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsialtas, J.T. and Maslaris, N. (2008) Evaluation of a Leaf Area Prediction Model Proposed for Sunflower. Photosynthetica, 46, 294-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-008-0052-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rafiq, M.A., Ali, A., Malik, M.A. and Hussain, M. (2010) Effect of Fertilizer Levels and Plant Densities on Yield and Protein Contents of Autumn Planted Maize. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 47, 201-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miralles, O.B., Valero, J.A.J. and Olalla, F.M.S. (1997) Growth, Development and Yield of Five Sunflower Hybrids. European Journal of Agronomy, 6, 47-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bange, M.P., Hammer, G.L, Milroy, S.P. and Rickert, K.G. (2000) Improving Estimates of Individual Leaf Area of Sunflower. Agronomy Journal, 92, 761-765. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924761x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakht, J., Ahmad, S., Tariq, M., Akber, H. and Shafi, M. (2006) Performance of Various Hybrids of Sunflower in Peshawar Valley. Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 1, 25-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. and Deekey, D.A. (1997) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 3nd Edition, McGraw Hill Book, Int. Co., New York, 400-428.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kho (2000) On Crop Production and Balance of Available Resources. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 80, 71-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aleman, P.R., Cholaky, S.L., Giayetto, O., Machado, A.J. and Fundora, H.O. (2002) Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Sunflower in Carbonate Soil in the Central Region of Cuba. Centro Agrícola, 29, 56-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nasim, W., Ahmad, A., Wajid, A., Akhtar, J. and Muhammad, D.B. (2001) Nitrogen Effect on Growth and Development of Sunflower Hybrids under Agro-Climatic Conditions of Multan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43, 2083-2092.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albrizio, R. and Steduto, P. (2005) Resource Use Efficiency of Field-Grown Sunflower, Sorgum, Wheat and Chickpea. Radiation Use Efficiency. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 130, 254-268.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akhtar, M.R. (1989) Studies on Growth and Yield of Five Sunflower Cultivated Plants in Two Different Geometrical Patterns. Msc (Hons) Thesis, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Fasilabad.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nasim, W. (2010) Modeling the Impact of Climate Change on Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under Different Agro-Climatic Conditions of Punjab-Pakistan. PhD Thesis, University College of Agriculture, Faisalabad.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, A., Aziz, M., Hassan, S.W., Asif, M., Ahmad, S., Mubeen, M. and Yasin, M. (2013) Growth and Yield Performance of Various Spring Planted Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) Hybrids under Semi-Arid Conditions of Sargodha Pakistan. Science International (Lahore), 25, 341-344.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sadras</surname><given-names> V.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>N.P. Stiochiometry of Cereal, Grain Legume and Oil Seed Crops</article-title><source> Field Crops Research</source><volume> 95</volume>,<fpage> 13</fpage>-<lpage>29</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cechin, I. and Fumis, T.F. (2004) Effect of Nitrogen Supply on Growth and Photosynthesis of Sunflower Plants Grown in Greenhouse. Plant Science, 166, 1375-1385.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakht, J., Shafi, M., Yousaf, M. and Shah, H.U. (2010) Physiological, Phenology and Yield of Sunflower (Autum) as Affected by NPK Fertilizer and Hybrids. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42, 1990-1992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khaliq, A. and Cheema, Z.A. (2005) Influence of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Some Agronomic Traits and Yield of Hybrid Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 7, 915-919.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nazir, M.S., Maqsood, N., Riaz, A. and Yaseen, M. (1987) Growth and Oil Contents of Spring Sunflower as Influenced by NPK Fertilizer Application. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 30, 142-145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akhtar, N. and Malik, M.A. (2005) Yield Response of Diverse Sunflower Hybrids to Varying Levels of Nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Research, 43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76464-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hussain, G., Amanullah, G. and Rashid, A. (1998) Responses of Sunflower Cultivars to Different Nitrogen Levels under D.I. Khan Conditions. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, No. 14, 411-415.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>