<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2017.85039</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-76390</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Growth Performance, Carcass Quality, Visceral Organs and Intestinal Histology in Broilers Fed Dietary Dried Fermented Ginger and/or Fermented Corncob Powder
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Duddoa</surname><given-names>Khonyoung</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Janjira</surname><given-names>Sittiya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koh-en</surname><given-names>Yamauchi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratory of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Kagawa-ken, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Animal Sciences and Agricultural Technology, Silpakorn University, Phetchaburi, Thailand</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Maejo University, Phrae Campus, Phrae, Thailand</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>05</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>565</fpage><lpage>577</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>March</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>21,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>May</day>	<month>24,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  To determine whether dried fermented ginger (DFG), fermented with Japanese mugwort silage juice, could be replaced by fermented corncob powder (FCP) as a of feed ingredient source without significant body weight decrease or damage to visceral organs (using gross anatomical observation), to intestinal villi (using light microscopy), or to the epithelial cells on the villus apical surface (using scanning electron microscopy) the following investigation was performed. Sixty-four male broilers were allotted to 4 groups: a basal diet group (control group), and basal diet groups with DFG at a level of 50 ppm; with DFG at 50 ppm and FCP at 250 ppm (50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP group); and with FCP at a level of 500 ppm (500 ppm FCP group). Feed intake, body weight gain, feed efficiency, carcass quality, small intestinal length and weight, and visceral organ weight were not different among groups. Furthermore, regarding intestinal villus height, villus area and crypt depth, a significant difference was not found among the groups. When these values of the control were expressed as an index of 100, the duodenal villus height of the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP group and the 500 ppm FCP group were 114 and 119, respectively. The duodenal villus area of the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP group and the 500 ppm FCP group were 125 and 158, respectively. These villus heights and areas are thought to be activated. On the epithelial cells on the villus apical surface in the duodenum and jejunum, the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP group had protuberated cells into the intestinal lumen and 
  deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells, suggesting that these cells are activated. The present results indicate that 
  small amounts of fermented corncob powder can be used as a feed supplement when mixed with fermented ginger powder, due to the synergy between the two ingredients, resulting in a 6% increase in body weight gain。
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fermented Ginger and Corncob</kwd><kwd> Growth Performance</kwd><kwd> Carcass Quality</kwd><kwd> Intestine</kwd><kwd> Light and Scanning Electron Microscpy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Feed represents the largest cost associated with poultry production, and the major source of feed ingredients is corn. However, corn ethanol production has grown rapidly in the last decade, subsequent to corn’s first being employed in biogas production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref1">1</xref>] from the 1970s in the USA; decreasing corn yields and the high demand for ethanol production have led to increased prices for corn. Consequently, for some time, some poultry farmers have been focusing on reducing feed costs without negative effects on growth performance by adding various dietary supplements. Corncob, as a by-product of corn crops, is produced in very large amounts from corn manufactory, due to the fact that 40% - 50% of a corn crop is comprised of corncob, the fibers of which are 30% - 40% cellulose, 20% - 36% hemicellulose, 16% lignin, and 8% other materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref2">2</xref>] . Consequently, most corncobs are not used effectively but are dumped into fields, resulting in environmental contamination due to the occurrence of mycotoxins such as aflatoxin. To increase of the economic value of corncobs, efforts should be made to ferment it for use as a poultry feed supplement.</p><p>Japanese mugwort silage juice (JMS) liquid includes natural microorganisms, such as lactic acid bacteria, yeast fungus, photosynthetic bacteria, ray-fungus, hyperthermal bacteria, and Aspergillus and Bacillus subtilis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref3">3</xref>] . When this JMS was mixed with dried ground ginger (dried fermented ginger; DFG), the production performance of layer chickens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref3">3</xref>] and body weight gain in broilers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref4">4</xref>] increased due to the hypertrophy of intestinal villi and epithelial cells. However, as ginger has a high purchase price, the use of agricultural by-products other than ginger was necessary. As described above, corncob is cheap and discarded without being effectively used; thus, it might be a useful and economical alternative replacement for ginger. The corncob itself is very difficult to use as a feed ingredient due to its high fiber content. In fact, the daily body weight gain decreased in pigs when their diets were supplemented with an increased level of corncob, because the high fiber in the corncob is resistant to the pig’s digestive enzymes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref5">5</xref>] . Consequently, corncob powder was fermented with waste JMS after DFG production. This fermented corncob powder (FCP) can be used as a broiler feed ingredient if measured values of birds fed dietary FCP do not show a significant decrease in growth performance compared to those in the control, and intestinal villi demonstrate no histological damage.</p><p>The aim of the present study was to determine whether ginger could be replaced by corncob as a source of feed ingredient to economize feed costs without a significant decrease in body weight. The following observations were performed: the presence or absence of damage on visceral organs using gross anatomical observation; on intestinal villi using light microscopy; and on the epithelial cells on the villus apical surface using scanning electron microscopy.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Preparation of DFG, JMS and FCP</title><p>Japanese mugwort plants were harvested and ensiled at room temperature to get JMS. Grounded ginger by-product was added into the JMS solution, kept under anaerobic conditions at room temperature for 4 - 5 d, dried in a hot air oven at 50˚C for 1 - 2 d and again ground for finally making DFG [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref4">4</xref>] . On the other hand, FCP was made as follows: sliced corncob was soaked into the remaining JMS after soaking ginger for DFG dried up, and then milled.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Birds, Diet and Housing</title><p>Newly hatched male broilers (Marshall Chunky) were obtained from a commercial hatchery, and conventional starter (1 - 21 d) and finisher (22 - 49 d) diets were used as basal diets (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). At 7 d of age, birds with similar weights were allotted to 4 groups: a basal diet group (control group) and basal diet with DFG (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) at 50 ppm level (50 ppm DFG group), with DFG at 50 ppm and FCP at 250 ppm (50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP group) and with FCP at 500 ppmlevel (500 ppm FCP group). Each group had 4 replicates of 4 chickens. The chicks were raised in floor pens in a room under natural light in the day and continuous fluorescent lighting at night during the experimental period. Feed and water were available ad libitum throughout the experimental period. Feed intake and body weight were monitored weekly.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Tissue Sampling</title><p>At 49 d of age, 4 birds per group from each replicate were dissipated. The entire small intestine was then removed and processed in a mixture of 3% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde fixative solution in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). The same fixative solution was additionally infused into the intestinal lumen at low pressure. The duodenum extended from the gizzard to the pancreatic and bile ducts; the jejunum extended from the bile ducts to Meckel’s diverticulum, and the ileum from the diverticulum to the ileocecal junction. A 2-cm length of the middle part of each intestinal segment was excised and prepared for light and scanning electron microscopy (SM). Each segment was gently flushed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) to remove the intestinal contents.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy</title><p>Samples for SM were cut lengthwise along the line of the mesentery, opened, and flushed with 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4). These samples were</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of the basal diets (g/kg diet)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Starter 1 to 21 d</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Finisher 22 to 49 d</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Milo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corn gluten meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean meal (45%CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice bran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fish meal (57%CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tallow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin/mineral premix<sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calculated composition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ME (kcal/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3,050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3,250</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fiber (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude ash (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available Phosphorus (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Vitamin and mineral premix include per kg of diet: retinyl acetate, 2880 &#181;g; cholecalciferol,<sub> </sub>48 &#181;g; DL-α- tocopherol acetate, 35 mg; menadione,<sub> </sub>2.6 mg; thiamine,<sub> </sub>5.8 mg; riboflavin,<sub> </sub>7.3 mg; pyridoxine,<sub> </sub>10.4 mg; cobalamine,<sub> </sub>12.6 &#181;g; biotin, 0.2 mg; folic acid, 1.0 mg; pantothenic acid, 16.1 mg; niacin, 69.1 mg; choline, 1400 mg; manganese, 92.4 mg; zinc, 79.9 mg; copper, 12.8 mg.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate composition of dried fermented ginger (DFG) and fermented corncob powder (FCP)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DFG</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FCP</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gross energy (kcal/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>All parameters of DFG samples were determined in triplicate (Incharoen and Yamauchi, 2009; Incharoenet et al. 2010).</p><p>pinned flat to prevent curling and fix them vertically with the mucosal face downward in a mixture of 3% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 1 h. The tissue block was cut into 5 &#215; 6 mm square and fixed for an additional 1 h. The pieces were rinsed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and post-fixed with 1% osmiumtetroxide in the ice-cold buffer for 2 h. Then, these pieces were washed in deionizing distilled water, stored in 45% ethanol for 24 h, and kept in 70% ethanol. Just before drying, specimens were transferred to 80%, 90% and 100% ethanol solution (120, 60 and 15 min, respectively) and submerged in t-butyl alcohol (15 min; 3 times). Afterwards, these specimens were freeze-dried (Hitachi ES-2030 freeze dryer, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The freeze-dried specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs with electrically conducting carbon paste, coated (E-1030 ion sputters, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and viewed under a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4300SE/N, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at eight kV. Morphological alterations of the epithelial cells on the villus apical surface were compared.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Light Microscopy</title><p>After keep in Bouin’s solution, the intestinal segments were embedded in paraplast wax, cut into 4-&#181;m transverse sections, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Eight sections per intestinal segment per bird were used to measure villus height, villus area and crypt depth by an image analyzer (Nis-Element D, Nikon Co., Tokyo, Japan). The 48 villi per bird were randomly chosen to measure villus height, from the villus tip to the base. And the 4 mean villus heights from 4 birds were expressed as a mean villus height for 1 group. The villus area was calculated from the villus height, basal width, and apical width [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref6">6</xref>] . Likewise, the longest crypt was chosen, and measured its length as crypt depth.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Gross Anatomical Observations of Visceral Organs</title><p>At 50 d of age, 8 birds in each group were used to measure carcass quality, small intestinal length and weight, and visceral organ weight. After decapitation, the entirety of the visceral organs was removed. The weights of the visceral organs, proventriculus, gizzard, and liver were measured. The whole small intestine, from the gizzard to the large intestine, was removed. The weights and lengths of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Data Collection and Statistical Analyses</title><p>Growth performance such as body weight and feed intake were measured weekly to calculate body weight gain, and feed efficiency was calculated from body weight gain per feed intake. Growth performance, carcass percentage, and light microscopic parameters were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significance was determined at p &lt; 0.05, using Duncan’s multiple range tests to compare differences among groups.</p><p>The experiment was performed in accordance with the guidelines and rules of care and use of laboratory animal experimentation established by Kagawa University in Japan. The experimental procedure was approved by the Animal Research Committee of the Kagawa University, Japan.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Growth Performance</title><p>Feed intake, body weight gain, and feed efficiency did not differ among the groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Carcass Quality, Visceral Organ Weight and Small Intestinal Length and Weight</title><p>Compared with the control, the percentage weights of carcass, thigh (drumsticks and thighs), breast, wing and abdominal fat did not differ among the experimental groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The relative length of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and total small intestinal length to 100 g body weight did not differ. The relative weights of total visceral organs, gizzard, proventriculus, live, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum to 100 g of body weight also did not differ.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Histological Analysis of Light Microscopic Parameters</title><p>Compared with the control, the intestinal villus height, villus area, and crypt depth in each intestinal segment of the experimental groups did not differ (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The intestinal villus height and villus area in each intestinal segment of the 500 ppm groups FCP had numerically higher values than the control, although they were not significantly different (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopic Observations of Epithelial Cells on the Villus Apical Surface</title><p>Although the majority of epithelial cells on the duodenal villus apical surface of the control group were flat (small arrows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)), some cells (large arrow) protuberated into the intestinal lumen. The villus apical surface of the 50 ppm DFG group was distributed with only flat cells (small arrows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). The majority of the cells of the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP group were protuberated (large arrows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c)). The apical surface of the 500 ppm FCP group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)) had a mix of flat cells (small arrows), protuberated cells (large arrows), and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells (arrows with D). On the jejunal villus apical surface of the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)), flat cells were found (small arrows). The 50 ppm DFG group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)) had</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of dietary basal diet with 0 (Control), 50 ppm DFG, 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP and 500 ppm FCP on feed intake, body weight gain, feed efficiency and ratio for 100 index of control in broilers during 7 - 49 days (Mean &#177; SEM, n = 4</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50ppm DFG</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >500ppm FCP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Body weight gain (g) Ratio for 100 index of control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3102.39 &#177; 466.41 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3217.13 &#177; 156.68 104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3301.94 &#177; 209.45 106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3115.37 &#177; 172. 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.725 100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feed intake (g) Ratio for 100 index of control Feed efficiency Ratio for 100 index of control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5952.08 &#177; 465.31 100 0.52 &#177; 0.05 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5964.82 &#177; 401.23 100 0.54 &#177; 0.01 104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6090.71 &#177; 133.38 102 0.54 &#177; 0.04 104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5822.68 &#177; 621.86 98 0.54 &#177; 0.04 104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.863 0.851</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DFG; dried fermented ginger, FCP; fermented corncob powder.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Carcass quality (upper, lower = ratio for 100 index of control) in broilers fed dietary basal diet with 0 (Control), 50 ppm DFG, 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP and 500 ppm FCP at 49 days (Mean &#177; SEM, n = 8)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppm DFG</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >500 ppm FCP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.653 &#177; 1.530 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.023 &#177; 1.551 9999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.676 &#177; 1.955 101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.657 &#177; 0.984 101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.111</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thigh (drumsticks and thighs) (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.802 &#177; 0.386 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.549 &#177; 0.472 97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.951 &#177; 0.650 102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.502 &#177; 0.700 96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.355</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breast (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.590 &#177; 1.121 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.995 &#177; 1.702 107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.407 &#177; 1.113 104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.124 &#177; 1.557 108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wing (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.775 &#177; 1.426 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.493 &#177; 1.878 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.427 &#177; 1.166 103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.482 &#177; 2.115 103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.578</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal fat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.657 &#177; 0.459 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.445 &#177; 0.396 87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.481 &#177; 0.305 89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.452 &#177; 0.527 88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.730</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length, cm/100 g BW</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duodenum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.973 &#177; 0.224 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.019 &#177; 0.171 105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.974 &#177; 0.768 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.024 &#177; 0.200 105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.897</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jejunum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.599 &#177; 0.516 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.584 &#177; 0.504 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.393 &#177; 0.188 92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.598 &#177; 0.375 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.710</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ileum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.571 &#177; 0.541 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.665 &#177; 0.468 104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.550 &#177; 0.313 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.623 &#177; 0.383 102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.951</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total small intestinal length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.143 &#177; 1.234 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.268 &#177; 1.095 102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.917 &#177; 0.494 96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.245 &#177; 0.792 102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.876</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight (g/100 g BW)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total visceral organ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.944 &#177; 1.362 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.033 &#177; 1.280 101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.606 &#177; 1.747 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.973 &#177; 0.618 92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.097</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gizzard</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.239 &#177; 0.110 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.295 &#177; 0.245 105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.209 &#177; 0.124 98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.222 &#177; 1.822 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.767</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proventriculus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.307 &#177; 0.049 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.303 &#177; 0.053 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.304 &#177; 0.037 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.245 &#177; 0.110 80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.220</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.065 &#177; 0.332 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.999 &#177; 0.294 97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.927 &#177; 0.253 93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.901 &#177; 0.273 92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.671</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duodenum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.566 &#177; 0.092 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.551 &#177; 0.082 97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.599 &#177; 0.103 106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.581 &#177; 0.126 103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.807</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jejunum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.291 &#177; 0.197 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.228 &#177; 0.231 95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.234 &#177; 0.125 96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.295 &#177; 0.194 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.836</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ileum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.945 &#177; 0.167 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.019 &#177; 0.105 108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.971 &#177; 0.109 103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.946 &#177; 0.137 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.645</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DFG; dried fermented ginger, FCP; fermented corncob powder.</p><p>flat cells (small arrow) and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells (arrows with D). The 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)) had faintly protuberated cells (large arrows) and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells (arrows with D). On the villus apical surface of the 500 ppm FCP group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d)), flat cells (small arrows), faintly protuberated cells (large arrow), and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells (arrows with D) were found. All of the epithelial cells on the ileal villus apical surface of the control group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)) protuberated into the intestinal lumen (large arrows). The epithelial cells of the 50 ppm DFG (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)), 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)) and 500 ppm FCP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)) groups were flat cells (small arrows).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Light microscopic parameter in broilers fed dietary basal diet with 0 (Control), 50 ppm DFG, 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP and 500 ppm FCP at 49 days (Mean &#177; SEM, n = 4)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppm DFG</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >500 ppm FCP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duodenum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villus height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32 &#177; 0.16 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40 &#177; 0.11 106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51 &#177; 0.12 114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57 &#177; 0.10 119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.534</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villus area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 &#177; 0.02 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 &#177; 0.01 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 &#177; 0.01 125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.03 158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.227</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crypt depth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >385.83 &#177; 4.16 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330.08 &#177; 60.48 86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224.76 &#177; 21.62 58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270.60 &#177; 24.37 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.115</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jejunum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villus height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21 &#177; 0.15 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.12 95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.09 95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40 &#177; 0.03 116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.226</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villus area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.04 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 &#177; 0.03 107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.01 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 &#177; 0.03 107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.987</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crypt depth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.63 &#177; 29.93 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.49 &#177; 45.51 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186.76 &#177; 14.97 86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.86 &#177; 14.06 101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.406</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ileum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villus height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67 &#177; 0.08 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61 &#177; 0.10 91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63 &#177; 0.10 94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67 &#177; 0.13 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.757</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Villus area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06 &#177; 0.01 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 &#177; 0.01 83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 &#177; 0.01 83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 &#177; 0.01 117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.103</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crypt depth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.38 &#177; 16.49 100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.33 &#177; 14.87 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.44 &#177; 13.38 85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.23 &#177; 20.56 91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.339</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DFG; dried fermented ginger, FCP; fermented corncob powder.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Duodenal villus apical surface of broilers in the basal diet group (control group; a) and in the basal diet supplemented with 50 ppm DFG (b); 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP (c) and basal diet with 500 ppm FCP (d); Conventional flat cells (small arrows) develop to protuberated cells (large arrows) and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells (arrows with d) in the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP and 500 ppm FCP groups, suggesting functional activation. Scale bar = 100 μm</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2702132x2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Jejunal villus apical surface of broilers in the basal diet group (control group; a) and in the basal diet supplemented 50 ppm DFG (b); 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP (c) and basal diet with 500 ppm FCP (d); Protuberated cells (large arrows) and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells (arrows with d) are activated than flat cells (small arrows). Scale bar = 100 μm</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2702132x3.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Ileal villus apical surface of broilers in the basal diet group (control group; a) and in the basal diet supplemented with 50 ppm DFG (b); 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP (c) and basal diet with 500 ppm FCP (d); Although the control has protuberated cell (large arrows), experimental groups show only flat cells (small arrows), suggesting no activation of experimental groups. Scale bar = 100 μm</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2702132x4.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>As epithelial cells originate in the crypts by mitosis and migrate steadily toward the villus tips where cells extrude into the lumen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref7">7</xref>] , the intestinal mucosal architecture (morphometric alterations of intestinal villi using light microscopy as well as morphological changes of the epithelial cells on the villus apical surface using scanning electron microscopy) can be a useful index for assessing cell activity. In light microscopy, intestinal villus length and epithelial cells on the villus apical surface are known to be related to intestinal function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref8">8</xref>] . An increased villus height is paralleled by an increased digestive and absorptive function of the intestine due to an increased absorptive surface area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref9">9</xref>] . As longer villi allow greater absorption of the available nutrients because of their greater surface area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref10">10</xref>] , increased villus height is an indicator of an activated villus function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref11">11</xref>] . Garlic induced lengthening of intestinal villi due to cellular hypertrophy and hyperplasia in rats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref12">12</xref>] and broilers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref13">13</xref>] . Sugar cane extract increased villus length in broilers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref14">14</xref>] . The present DFG and FCP did not affect the villus height, villus area and crypt depth, suggesting that the corncob fibers did not damage the intestinal villus function. These histological results correspond with the fact that growth performance, carcass quality, and visceral organ weight did not show a significant decrease. Because of the high-fiber content in non-fermented corncob, a decreased daily body weight gain was concurrent with an increased level of corncob supplementation, due to its resistance to the pig’s digestive enzymes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref5">5</xref>] . The present morphometric values indicating no damage might be induced as a result of the fermentation of corncobs using waste JMS after DFG production; the fermentation of corncobs using rumen filtrate enhanced the crude protein value and reduced the crude fiber content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref15">15</xref>] . In scanning electron microscopy, the protuberated cells and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells were observed in the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP and 500 ppm FCP groups. These morphological changes in the protuberated cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref8">8</xref>] and in the deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref16">16</xref>] are well known to indicate more activation than flat cells, suggesting that DFG and FCP can stimulate epithelial cell function at the ultrastructural level. This might be related to the presence of many kinds of nutrients in ginger, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, as well as potentially bioactive constituents such as gingerols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref17">17</xref>] (Koo et al., 2001) and shogaols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref19">19</xref>] . These substances from ginger seem to remain in JMS; as the present FCP was fermented with waste JMS after DFG production, the FCP also contains these substances. The JMS itself also includes lactic acid bacteria, yeast fungus, photosynthetic bacteria, ray fungus, hyperthermal bacteria, and Aspergillus and Bacillus subtilis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref3">3</xref>] . These substances might become packed into the pores of the corncob, arrive in the intestine without receiving the effects of stomach acid, and flow out from the pores into the intestinal lumen, and thus might have an effect on intestinal function, resulting in the activation of the epithelial cells in the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP and the 500 ppm FCP groups. The phenomenon that charcoal pores can become packed with substances was demonstrated using electron microscopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>From a scientific standpoint using a statistical treatment, the growth perfor- mance and morphometric parameters of intestinal villi have no alterations. When these values are expressed as an index of 100, the experimental groups showed a value of 104, particularly in the body weight gain of the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP was 106. Within poultry production, a supplement resulting in a body weight gain of more than 2% than the control is considered effective. Regarding growth performance, although most of the percentages of the carcass, thigh, breast and wing in the experimental groups were higher than the control, the abdominal fat decreased, suggesting that the DFG and FCP affect the growth performance but suppresses fat deposition. Regarding the gross anatomical observations of the intestine and visceral organs, we could not find a difference among the groups. However, the villus height and area showed higher values in the transition from the ileum to the duodenum. This is in harmony with reports that the duodenum and initial jejunal segment absorbed lipids, while the ileum did not play a significant role in digestion or the absorption of triglycerides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76390-ref21">21</xref>] . The duodenal crypt depth showed an extreme decrease in all experimental groups. As the crypt area is known to be a cell proliferation zone, the duodenal epithelial cells in the experimental groups do not need to multiply by cell mitosis, because the epithelial cells on the villus area were activated. This corresponds with hypertrophied cells in the duodenum and jejunum of the 50 ppm DFG + 250 ppm FCP group as shown in the scanning electron microscopic picture. Such activation is thought to be induced by the synergistic effect of the many kinds of nutrients in ginger and the microorganisms in JMS.</p><p>In conclusion, a dietary mixture of a small amount of DFG and a small amount of FCP induced protuberated epithelial cells and deeper cells at the sites of recently exfoliated cells on the intestinal villus apical surface in the duodenum and jejunum, suggesting an activated function of the cells. This cell activation induced a 14% increase in duodenal villus height and a 24% increase in jejunal villus area, resulting in a 6% increase in body weight gain. The present results suggest that a small amount of fermented corncob powder can be used as a feed supplement when mixed with fermented ginger powder, due to their synergistic interaction.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Khonyoung, D., Sittiya, J. and Yamauchi, K. (2017) Growth Performance, Carcass Quality, Visceral Or- gans and Intestinal Histology in Broilers Fed Dietary Dried Fermented Ginger and/ or Fermented Corncob Powder. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 8, 565-577. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2017.85039</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76390-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hutnan, M., Spalkova, V., Bodik, I., Kolesarova, N. and Lazor, M. (2010) Biogas Production from Maize Grains and Maize Silage. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 19, 323-329.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muchlisyam (2014) Corn Cobs Hemicelluloses Isolation Method Comparison and its Characterization with Infra Red Spectrophotometry (FTIR) and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). International Journal of ChemTech Research, 6, 3062-3070.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Incharoen, T. and Yamauchi, K. (2009) Production Performance, Egg Quality and Intestinal Histology in Laying Hens Fed Dietary Dried Fermented Ginger. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8, 1078-1085. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.1078.1085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Incharoen, T., Yamauchi, K. and Thongwittaya, N. (2010) Intestinal Villus Histological Alterations in Broilers Fed Dietary Dried Fermented Ginger. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 94, e130-e137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.00994.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kanengoni, A.T., Chimonyo, M., Ndimba, B.K. and Dzama, K. (2015) Potential of Using Maize Cobs in Pig Diets—A Review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28, 1669-1679. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iji, P.A., Saki, A. and Tivey, D.R. (2001) Body and Intestinal Growth of Broiler Chicks on a Commercial Starter Diet. 1. Intestinal Weight and Mucosal Development. British Poultry Science, 42, 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120073151</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Potten, C.S. (1998) Stem Cells in Gastrointestinal Epithelium: Numbers, Characteristics and Death. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science, 353, 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0246</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamauchi, K., Incharoen, T. and Yamauchi, K. (2010) The Relationship between Intestinal Histology and Function as Shown by Compensatory Enlargement of Remnant Villi after Midgut Resection in Chickens. Anatomical Record, 293, 2071-2079. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21268</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amat, C., Planas, J.M. and Moreto, M. (1996) Kinetics of Hexose Uptake by the Small and Large Intestine of the Chicken. American Journal of Physiological Review, 271, 1085-1089.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Caspary</surname><given-names> W.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Physiology and Pathophysiology of Intestinal Absorption</article-title><source> The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition</source><volume> 55</volume>,<fpage> 299S</fpage>-<lpage>308S</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Longhout, D.J., Schutte, J.B., Van, L.P., Wiebenga, J. and Tamminga, S. (1999) Effect of Dietary High and Low Methyllated Citrus Pectin on the Activity of the Ileal Microflora and Morphology of the Small Intestine Wall of Broiler Chick. British Poultry Science, 40, 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, A. and Sandhu, R.S. (1998) Effect of Garlic Agglutinin and Garlic Extracts on the Rat Jejunum. Nutrition Research, 18, 841-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(98)00069-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdullah, A.Y., Mahmoud, K.Z., Nusairat, B.M. and Qudsieh, R.I. (2010) Small Intestinal Histology, Production Parameters, and Meat Quality as Influenced by Dietary Supplementation of Garlic (Allium sativum) in Broiler Chicks. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 9, 414-419. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2010.e80</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khambualai, O., Yamauchi, K. and Ruttanavut, J. (2010) Effect of Sugar Cane Extract, Commercial Probiotic and Their Mixture on Growth Performance and Intestinal Histology in Broiler Chickens. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science, 5, 132-138. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2010.132.138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adeyemi, O.A. and Familade, F.O. (2003) Replacement of Maize by Rumen Filtrate Fermented Corn-Cob in Layer Diets. Bioresource Technology, 90, 221-224.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samanya, M. and Yamauchi, K. (2001) Morphological Changes of the Intestinal Villi in Chickens Fed the Dietary Charcoal Powder Including Wood Vinegar Compounds. Journal of Poultry Science, 38, 289-301. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.38.289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koo, K.L., Ammit, A.J., Tran, V.H., Duke, C.C. and Roufogalis, B.D. (2001) Gingerols and Related Analogues Inhibit Arachidonic Acid-Induced Human Platelet Serotonin Release and Aggregation. Thrombosis Research, 103, 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-3848(01)00338-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, C., Liu, T., Liu, Y., Tseng, W., Liu, R., Lu, F., Lin, Y., Kuo, S. and Chen, C. (2007) 6-Shogaol (Alkanone from Ginger) Induces Apoptotic Cell Death of Human Hepatoma p53 Mutant Mahlavu Subline via an Oxidative Stress-Mediated Caspase-Dependent Mechanism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 948-954. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0624594</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saha, A., Blando, J., Silver, E., Beltran, L., Sessler, J. and DiGiovanni, J. (2014) 6-Shogaol from Dried Ginger Inhibits Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells Both in Vitro and in Vivo through Inhibition of STAT3 and NF-κB Signaling. Cancer Prevention Research, 7, 627-638. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0420</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamauchi, K., Manabe, N., Matsumoto, Y., Takenoyama, S. and Yamauchi, K. (2014) Increased Collagen III in Culled Chicken Meat after Feeding Dietary Wood Charcoal and Vinegar Contributes to Palatability and Tenderness. Animal Science Journal, 85, 468-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12160</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76390-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wissing, S.L. and Graney, D.O. (1968) Membrane Modifications in the Apical Endocytic Complex of Ileal Epithelial Cells. Journal of Cell Biology, 39, 564-579. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.39.3.564</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>