<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2017.55005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-76322</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Measurement of Gamma Emitting Radionuclides for Assessment, Environmental Hazards of Radiation in Rock and Soil Samples of Shabwah and Hadramout Regions, Yemen
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sherif</surname><given-names>S. Nafee</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dheya</surname><given-names>Al-Othmany</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Safia</surname><given-names>H.Q. Hamidalddin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>J.H.</surname><given-names>Al-Zahrani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>W.R.</surname><given-names>Alharbi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hanan</surname><given-names>M. Barashed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Nuclear Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Physics Department, Girls Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Physics Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>05</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>10,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>19,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>May</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The natural radioactivity of 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th and 
  <sup>40</sup>K and the fallout of 
  <sup>137</sup>Cs in soils and granite rocks of two regions in Yemen (Shabwah and Hadramout) were measured by using gamma-ray spectrometry (HPGe) detector. The average values of the radionuclides 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th and 
  <sup>40</sup>K in the soil samples are 14.34, 25.78 and 566.05 Bq/kg respectively. For rock samples, the average activity concentration for 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th and 
  <sup>40</sup>K are 45, 106 and 1235 Bq/kg respectively. Low concentration values of 
  <sup>137</sup>Cs in soil and rock samples under investigation, are not radiologically important. The radium equivalent activity (Raeq) and external hazard index (Hex) of all samples are less than the limits of 370 Bq
  &#183;kg
  <sup>-1</sup> and unity, respectively. The average values of total absorbed dose rate due to three primordial radionuclides in soil and rock samples are 46.5 nGy/h and 138.36 nGy/h, respectively, where the absorbed average value of the granite is higher than the permitted limit. So, the local people must avoid using these granite samples as the interior decorative materials of dwelling without radioactivity control.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gamma Spectrometry</kwd><kwd> Annual Effective Dose</kwd><kwd> External Hazard Index</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The natural radioactivity of soil and rock samples is usually determined from the <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and 40 K contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref1">1</xref>] . A significant amount of man-made radionuclides <sup>137</sup>Cs, may also present in the environment as a result of testing of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere, accidents and the routine discharge of radionuclides from nuclear installations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref2">2</xref>] . The specific level radiation in the crust varies from one region to another as the concentrations of these natural radioactive elements vary due to their non-uniform nature in soils and the types of rock from which the soil originates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref3">3</xref>] . The knowledge of radiation levels in the environment is an important for assessing the effects of radiation exposure. So, the aim of the present study is to measure the natural radioactivity levels for estimating the radiogecal hazard indices in soils and granite rocks. This work can be used as a baseline guideline for assessing the exposure of the natural radiation in the study region, especially, in this area, the rocks and soils are used as building materials. The studied regions located in southwestern Yemen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Samples Collection and Preparation</title><p>A total of twenty soil sample at depths (0 - 5, 5 - 50, 50 - 60 and 60 - 70 cm) underground and 6 granite rock samples were collected from different locations in Shabwah and Hadramout regions, Yemen, respectively. The sampling locations were chosen mostly in a wide area that we believe that it’s representative of the important region. All soil samples collected from undisturbed sites located away from buildings, trees and roads to ensure that there was no influence of man- made structures and anthropogenic activities.The collected samples (soil and</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location map of studying regions</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x2.png"/></fig><p>granite) were first sundried and then oven dried at 110˚C to constant weight. The samples were pulverized, homogenized and sieved through 1-mm mesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref4">4</xref>] . 500 gm of each meshed sample was replaced in Marinelli beaker and then was stored for four weeks to reach the equilibrium state between radium and its decay products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref5">5</xref>] . Radioactivity measurements were performed by using High purity Germanium (HPGe) detector (25% relative efficiency). The measurement time of activity or background was 82800 seconds. The radioactivity concentration of <sup>226</sup>Ra was determined from the photopeaks of 295.09, 351.87 Kev (<sup>214</sup>Pb), 609.31 Kev &amp; 1120.27 keV &amp; 1764.49 keV (<sup>214</sup>Bi). <sup>232</sup>Th radioactivity was determined from 238.58 Kev (<sup>212</sup>Pb), 727.25 Kev (<sup>212</sup>Bi) and 911.16 keV &amp; 968.97 Kev (<sup>228</sup>Ac) while the <sup>40</sup>K radioactivity was determined from 1460.8 Kev and finally, <sup>137</sup>Cs was determined from the decay of <sup>40</sup>Ar and <sup>137</sup>Ba [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Calculations</title><p>The activity concentrations (Bq/kg) for the natural radionuclides in the measured samples were calculated after decay correction using the equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76322-formula483"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x3.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A<sub>c</sub> is the activity concentration (Bq/kg) in the sample, Nc is the net area under the corresponding peak/second, m the dry weight sample mass (kg), β the branching ratio, and ε<sub>abs</sub> is the detection absolute efficiency of a specific energy.</p><p>The radium equivalent activity is a very useful guideline in organization the safety standards in radiation protection for humans. The index calculated by the following relation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Ra<sub>eq</sub> = A<sub>Ra</sub> + (A<sub>Th</sub> &#215; 1.43) + (A<sub>K</sub> &#215; 0.077) (2)</p><p>where A<sub>Ra</sub>, A<sub>Th</sub> and A<sub>K</sub> are the activities of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K, respectively, in Bq/kg, The formula is based on the assumption that 370 Bq/kg of <sup>226</sup>Ra, 259 Bq/kg of <sup>232</sup>Th and 481 Bq/kg of <sup>40</sup>K produce the same gamma-ray dose rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The representative level index, I<sub>γ</sub> is used to estimate gamma radiation associated with the natural radionuclides in soil and calculated by the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref1">1</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76322-formula484"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A<sub>Ra</sub>, A<sub>Th</sub> and A<sub>K</sub> are the activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K, respectively in Bq/kg.</p><p>The external hazard index Hex can be calculated by the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76322-formula485"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A<sub>Ra</sub>, A<sub>Th</sub> and A<sub>K</sub> are the activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K, respectively. The maximum value of H<sub>ex</sub> to be less than unity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The absorbed gamma dose rates D(nGy/h) in air at 1m above the Earth’s surface for the uniform distribution of radionuclides were calculated based on guidelines given by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76322-formula486"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, A<sub>Ra</sub>, A<sub>Th</sub> and A<sub>K</sub> are the activity concentrations (Bq/kg) of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and<sup> 40</sup>K, respectively.</p><p>The annual effective dose rate was calculated from the absorbed dose through the application of dose conversion factor of 0.7 Sv/Gy with occupancy in the outdoor factor 0.2. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76322-formula487"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where 8,760 h is the number of hours in 1 year. 10<sup>−6</sup> is a conversion factor of nano and Milli.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Activity Concentrations</title><p>The results of the measured values of activity concentrations for <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs obtained from the samples are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. From this table, the average values, concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, in soil and are less than the world average values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . <sup>40</sup>K activity concentrations are in the range between 510.92 in the sample (S3) to 600.75 Bq/kg in sample (S5) with an average value is</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Activity concentrations of natural radionuclides (<sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K) and the fallout nuclide <sup>137</sup>Cs (Bq/kg) in soil and granite samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample code</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Activity concentrations (Bq/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>226</sup>Ra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>232</sup>Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>137</sup>Cs</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >546.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >560.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >595.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >L.D.L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >583.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.10 - 15.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.85 - 29.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510.92 - 600.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 - 1.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14. 28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >566.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >UNSCEAR 2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Granite rock samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1480.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1031.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1058.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1489.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1076.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1272.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.36 - 53.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.93 - 128.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1031.26 - 1489.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 - 1.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >UNSCEAR 2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>higher than the world average value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . Higher concentration values of <sup>40</sup>K were obtained from the soil of Shabwah region, probably because the use of inorganic fertilizer in some locations and could also be attributed to the wearing away from the weathered surfaces of the potassium rich, igneous rocks which dominate a part of the geology of this region. The artificial radionuclide of <sup>137</sup>Cs concentrations in the soil samples are within the global atmospheric fallout and lower than the reported data for other countries. For granite samples, <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K average concentrations are 45, 106, and 1235 Bq/kg respectively. The average values of <sup>226</sup>Ra fall within the worldwide average values. While, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K average values are twice the worldwide average values (50, 50 and 500 Bq/kg) respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . The content of <sup>40</sup>K in granite samples is the highest in all the sampling areas. So, it is the most abundant radionuclide of the total (<sup>238</sup>U + <sup>232</sup>Th + <sup>40</sup>K), it is abundant about 89% followed by <sup>232</sup>Th 7.7%. And finally <sup>226</sup>Ra is 3.3%. <sup>137</sup>Cs is detected in all granite samples under investigation. The mean concentration of <sup>137</sup>Cs is 0.67 Bq/kg. These values are not radiologically important. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the comparison between the activity concentrations of soil samples with that of other countries of the World. The variations in the activity concentrations in the soil of the various locations of the world, depend upon the geological and geographical conditions of the area and the extent of fertilizer applied to the agricultural lands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, shows that, for granite samples results obtained in the present work are consistent with previous results and all results being within the range given in the report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . In general, the radioactivity in granite samples varied from one country to another [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows a comparison between the obtained average values activity concentrations in soil and granite and the recommended values by UNSCEAR2000.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Radiological Hazard Indices in Soil and Granite Rock Samples</title><p>The computed results of the radiological hazard indices were listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of natural radioactivity concentrations (Bq/kg) in the present soil samples with the reported values from different countries of the world</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Average activity concentration (Bq/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>226</sup>Ra<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>232</sup>Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>K</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yemen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14. 28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >566.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1535.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref9">9</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia (Al-Qassim)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref11">11</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref12">12</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egypt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref13">13</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >363.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref14">14</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jordan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref15">15</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >World average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of natural radioactivity concentration (Bq/kg) in the present granite samples with the reported values from different countries of the world</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Average activity concentration (Bq/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>226</sup>Ra<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>232</sup>Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>K</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yemen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yemen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1743</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref17">17</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >987</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref19">19</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egypt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref20">20</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Greek</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >881</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref23">23</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Italy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brazil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref25">25</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref26">26</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >World average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >UNSCEAR 2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra,<sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K average values in soil and granite samples under investigation and UNSCEAR2000 values</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x8.png"/></fig><p>The values of Ra<sub>eq</sub> Bq/kg for soil and granite rock samples are lower than the allowed value of 370 Bq/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . Representative level index (I<sub>ɣ</sub>) average value is less than one, this means that the external radiation dose within the soil samples is less than the recommended dose of 1 Bq/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . The I<sub>ɣ</sub> average values for granite rock is higher than 1 Bq/kg. External hazard index (Hex) for soil and granite samples are less than the limit value of unity. As can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The total absorbed dose rate calculated for Shabowah’s soil, it less than the world average value of 57 nGy/h. The presence of <sup>40</sup>K in Shabwah’s soil contributes a maximum of 52% to the total absorbed dose rate, followed by <sup>232</sup>Th of 35% and <sup>226</sup>Ra of 13%, these contributions were illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Shows values of radium equivalent (Ra<sub>eq</sub>), level index (I<sub>γ</sub>) and external hazard (H<sub>ex</sub>) for soil samples (Shabwah) and granite rock samples (Hadramout), Yemen</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample code</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Radiological Hazard</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ra<sub>eq </sub>(Bq/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>ɣ</sub> (Bq/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D (nGy/h)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D (eff) mSv/y</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.033</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.39 - 100.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 - 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 - 0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.34 - 49.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028 - 0.033</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Granite rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.097</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.091</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >308.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.099</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >320.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >285.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.091</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236.79 - 320.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64 - 0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89 - 1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.58 - 149.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075 - 0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.092</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between percentage contributions absorbed dose of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K to total absorbed dose of soil and granite rock samples, Yemen.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2170432x10.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>The average value of annual effective dose equivalent of the study soil less than the world average value effective dose of 0.07 mSv/y [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . According to these results of radiogecal hazard indices, one can indicate that the soil samples are safe and can be used as a construction material without posing any significant radiological threat to the population. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the average value of the absorbed dose rate of Hadramout region’s granite samples is almost twice the world average value. So, the local people must avoid using these granite samples in the building construction, especially in the interior decorative materials of dwelling without radioactivity control. The average total effective dose rates (D<sub>eff</sub>) for granite samples is far lower than the 1.0 mSv/y recommended by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] . This value is According to these results of radiogecal hazard indices, one can indicate that the soil samples are safe and can be used as a construction material without posing any significant radiological threat to the population. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the average value of the absorbed dose rate of Hadramout region’s granite samples is almost twice the world average value. So, the local people must avoid using these granite samples in the building construction, especially in the interior decorative materials of dwelling without radioactivity control. The average total effective dose rates (D<sub>eff</sub>) for granite samples is far lower than the 1.0 mSv/y recommended by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76322-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The natural radioactivity levels of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K have been measured in soil and granite rock samples of two regions in Yemen using gamma ray spectroscopy. The mean activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K in soil are 14.28, 25.78 and 566.05 Bq/kg, respectively, and for the granite rock samples the mean concentrations are 45,106 and 1235 Bq/kg, respectively. These values are compared with published values of other countries. The estimated hazard indices in soil samples are well lower than the recommended limit. Therefore, the present soil can be used as a construction or building materials without posing any radiological effect to the population. In granite rocks, the calculated dose rate was observed twice the world average value of 57 μSv/Y, which put the users of the granite rocks and people around the area on radiological hazard. This work has established background guideline on the natural radioactivity levels in the study area, which will provide a future reference for other studies.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nafee, S.S., Al-Othmany, D., Hamidalddin, S.H.Q., Al- Zahrani, J.H., Alharbi, W.R. and Barashed, H.M. (2017) Measurement of Gamma Emitting Radionuclides for Assessment, Environmental Hazards of Radiation in Rock and Soil Samples of Shabwah and Hadramout Regions, Yemen. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.55005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76322-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NEA-OECD (1979) Exposure to Radiation from Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials. Report by the Group of Experts of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kabir, K.A., Islam, S.M.A. and Rahman, M.M. (2009) Distribution of Radionuclides in Surface Soil and Bottom Sediment in the District of Jessore, Bangladesh and Evaluation of Radiation Hazard. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, 33, 117-130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banerjee, K.S., Guin, R., Gutierrez-Villanueva, J.L., Charro, M.E. and Sengupta, D. (2012) Variation in U-238 and Th-232 Enrichment in U-Mineralized Zone and Geological Controls on Their Spatial Distribution, Singhbhum Shear Zone of India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65, 2103-2110.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1191-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IAEA (1989) International Atomic Energy Agency. Measurement of Radiation in Food and the Environment. Guidebook. Technical Report Series No. 295, IAEA, Vienna.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mollah, S., Rahman, N.M., Kodlus, M.A. and Husain, S.R. (1987) Measurement of High Natural Background Radiation Levels by TLD at Cox and Bazar Coastal Areas in Bangladesh. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 18, 39-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beretka, J. and Mathew, P.J. (1985) Natural Radioactivity of Australian Building Industrial Materials, Industrial Wastes and By-Products. Health Physics, 48, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stranden</surname><given-names> E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1976</year>)<article-title>Some Aspects on Radioactivity of Building Materials</article-title><source> Health Physics</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 167</fpage>-<lpage>173</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bala, P., Mehra, R. and Ramola, R.C. (2014) Distribution of Natural Radioactivity in Soil Samples and Radiological Hazards in Building Material of Una, Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 142, 11-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Taher, A. and Alzahrani, J.H. (2015) Radioactivity Measurements and Radiation Dose Assessments in Soil of Al-Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia. Indian Journal of Pure &amp; Applied Physics (IJPAP), 52, 147-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Innocent, A.J., Onimisi, M.Y. and Jonah, S.A. (2013) Evaluation of Naturally Occurring Radionuclide Materials in Soil Samples Collected from Some Mining Sites in Zamfara State, Nigeria. British Journal of Applied Science &amp; Technology, 3, 684-692.https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2013/3244</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Almayahi, B.A., Tajuddin, A.A. and Jaafar, M.S. (2012) Effect of the Natural Radioactivity Concentrations and 226 Ra/238 U Disequilibrium on Cancer Diseases in Penang, Malaysia. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 81, 1547-1558.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Taher, A. (2011) Terrestrial Gamma Radioactivity Levels and Their Corresponding Extent Exposure of Environmental Samples from Wadi El Assuity Protective Area, Assuit, Upper Egypt. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 145, 405-410.https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq425</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baldik, R., Aytekin, H. and Erer, M. (2011) Radioactivity Measurements and Radiation Dose Assessments Due to Natural Radiation in Karabük (Turkey). Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 289, 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1077-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleh, H. and Shayeb, M.A. (2014) Natural Radioactivity Distribution of Southern Part of Jordan (Ma’an) Soil. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 65, 184-189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sonkawade, R.G., Kant, K., Muralithar, S., Kumar, R. and Ramola, R.C. (2008) Natural Radioactivity in Common Building Construction and Radiation Shielding Materials. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 2254-2259.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abd El-Mageed, I.A., El-Kamel, H.A., Abbady, A., et al. (2011) Assessment of Natural and Anthropogenic Radioactivity Levels in Rocks and Soils in the Environments of Juban Town in Yemen. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 80, 710-715.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guillén, J., Tejado, J.J., Baeza, A., Corbacho, J.A. and Munoz, J.G. (2014) Assessment of Radiological Hazard of Commercial Granites from Extremadura (Spain). Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 132, 81-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aydarous, A.S., Zeghib, S. and Al-Dughmah, M. (2010) Measurements of Natural Radioactivity and the Resulting Radiation Doses from Commercial Granites. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 142, 363-368. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amin, R.M. (2012) Gamma Radiation Measurements of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Samples from Commercial Egyptian Granites. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67, 771-775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1538-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Papadopoulos, A., Christofides, G., Koroneos, A., Papadopoulou, L., Papastefanou, C. and Stoulos, S. (2013) Natural Radioactivity and Radiation Index of the Major Platonic Bodies in Greece. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 124, 227-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cetin, E., Altinsoy, N. and Orgün, Y. (2012) Natural Radioactivity Levels of Granites Used in Turkey. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 151, 299-305.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asgharizadeh, F., Abbasi, A., Hochaghani, O. and Gooya, E.S. (2011) Natural Radioactivity in Granite Stones Used as Building Materials in Iran. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 149, 321-326.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marocchi, M., Righi, S., Bargossi, G.M. and Gasparotto, G. (2011) Natural Radionuclides Content and Radiological Hazard of Commercial Ornamental Stones: An Integrated Radiometric and Mineralogical-Petrographic Study. Radiation Measurements, 46, 538-545.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anjos, R.M.D., Ayub, J.J., Cid, A.S., Cardoso, R. and Lacerda, T. (2011) External Gamma-Ray Dose Rate and Radon Concentration in Indoor Environments Covered with Brazilian Granites. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 102, 1055-1061.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76322-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iwaoka, K., Hosoda, M., Tabe, H., Ishikawa, T., Tokonami, S. and Yonehara, H. (2013) Activity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides and Radon and Thoron Exhalation Rates in the Rocks Used as Decorative Wall Coverings in Japan. Health Physics, 104, 41-50.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>