<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JGIS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geographic Information System</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2151-1950</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jgis.2017.93015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JGIS-76237</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Ecosystem Responses in the Distribution of Black Clam (&lt;i&gt;Villorita cyprinoides&lt;/i&gt;) Beds in Vembanad Estuary during Environmental Changes Using GIS and RS
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thankam</surname><given-names>Theresa Paul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Grinson</surname><given-names>George</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Dennis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N.</surname><given-names>R. Athira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>R.</surname><given-names>S. Biradar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rajani</surname><given-names>Khandagale</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>K.</surname><given-names>G. Padmakumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Former Associate Director of Research, Regional Agriculture Research Station, Kumarakom, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Fishery Resources Assessment Division, Ernakulam North, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Kochi Unit of Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Ernakulam North, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Socio Economic Evaluation and Technology Transfer Division, Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Versova, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Socio Economic Evaluation and Technology Transfer Division, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Ernakulam North, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>thankamtheresa@gmail.com(TTP)</email>;<email>grinsongeorge@gmail.com(GG)</email>;<email>dennis_oceantech@gmail.com(AD)</email>;<email>athira31@gmail.com(NRA)</email>;<email>rsbiradar@gmail.com(RSB)</email>;<email>rajani@gmail.com(RK)</email>;<email>kgpadman@gmail.com(KGP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>05</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>245</fpage><lpage>266</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>15,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>May</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The biomass and distribution of black clam (Villorita cyprinoides) in Vembanad, a tropical estuary located along the southwest coast of India varied significantly. Sampling was done in freshwater-dominated zone in the south (distal) and brackish water zone in the north (proximal), during pre and post monsoon seasons. Clam biomass was estimated from samples, collected from different stations during the study period. Water transparency and temperature were measured at the sample sites. Water samples were collected and analysed for salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), pH and hardness. There was a significant difference in the clam biomass during the two seasons in the distal zone, and those collected from the distal and proximal zones during pre-monsoon season. The data were further analysed to determine the factors affecting the clam biomass distribution in the two zones and seasons. Factor analyses, comparing the distal zone during two seasons and zonal variations were similar to earlier observations. Step wise regression analyses found that dissolved oxygen (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.3) is the only variable affecting clam survival during pre-monsoon period in the distal and proximal zones. A geographic map of the region obtained from the Indian satellite sensor LISS (Linear Image Self Scanner) was used along with in situ data to map the results using inverse distance weightage model. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Clam Beds</kwd><kwd> Inverse Distance Weightage</kwd><kwd> GIS</kwd><kwd> Monitoring</kwd><kwd> Environment</kwd><kwd> Model</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Tropical estuaries are highly productive and critical to the maintenance of coastal fisheries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref1">1</xref>] . The faunal composition of such estuaries varies at spatial and temporal scales in response to the localised natural and human disturbances of different magnitudes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref4">4</xref>] . There are observed seasonal variations in clam biomass across a tropical estuary and dredging inside the estuary can affect the spatial distribution.</p><p>Villorita cyprinoides which is a major molluscan resource of Vembanad estuary contribute 97% of the molluscan catches from India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref5">5</xref>] . Clams are important for their nutritional benefits, and valued for their taste [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref7">7</xref>] . But our limited knowledge on the spatial and temporal distribution of this invertebrate fauna restricts a better insight into the factors influencing their changes in community structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref10">10</xref>] which is essential for the better management of such species.</p><p>The distribution of clams in the Vembanad estuary is patchy. But being sedentary organisms, their survival and growth are dictated by a combination of favourable hydrographical conditions. The observations on environmental variables and their relation on clam biomass distribution in this study would help the fishing community to identify easily the zones of high abundance of the clams, in various geographic areas across the estuary and during the two seasons studied in the estuary.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Vembanad estuary, situated in Kerala, is the largest tropical wetland ecosystem along the south-west coast of India. This tropical estuary, fed by ten rivers draining into the Arabian Sea, covers an area of 21,050 ha spread between latitudes 9.59˚N and 10.61˚N and longitudes 76.19˚E and 76.43˚E. The rich biodiversity of shell fish and other aquatic resources and their socio-economic importance, made Vembanad estuary a wetland of international importance, and is designated a “Ramsar site”. A unique characteristic of the estuary is the Thaneermukkom salt water barrier which divides the water body into two zones―one with freshwater fed by the rivers on the southern side, and the other with brackish water fed both by rivers and Arabian Sea on the northern side (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Our study was conducted in these two zones in Vembanad estuary where the freshwater zone is termed as distal and the brackish zone as proximal. The zonation is relative to the mouth of the lake. The sampling was done during</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Study area (Kerala with Vembanad Lake)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x2.png"/></fig><p>different seasons observed in this tropical monsoon-influenced environment. Usually three seasons are identified in Kerala, namely pre-monsoon (February - May), monsoon (June - August and October - December) and post-monsoon (December - January) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sample Collection</title><p>Ten sampling stations were identified in the distal zone of the lake, and sampled during pre- (March - April, 2008) and post-monsoon (December, 2007 - January, 2008) seasons to study the variations of clam population in relation to physico-chemical variables (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Monsoon season was exempted from sampling on account of unfavourable weather conditions.</p><p>Similarly, ten sampling stations were identified in the proximal zone of the estuary, and sampled during pre-monsoon season to study the impact of dredging on the clam population in the estuary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Sampling was not done during monsoon and post-monsoon season in the dredged area (proximal zone) as dredging was suspended at this time. The distal sampling stations were named D<sub>1-10</sub> and d<sub>1-10</sub> for the pre and post-monsoon sampling respectively, whereas the proximal stations were named P<sub>1-10</sub> for the pre-</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sampling stations in the distal zone during pre and post monsoon seasons</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x3.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Sampling stations in the proximal zone during pre-monsoon seasons</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x4.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geographic coordinates of the sampling stations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Distal Zone</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Proximal Zone</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pre-monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Post-monsoon</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pre-monsoon</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5924</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5912</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.36715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72436</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5881</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5888</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.37196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72223</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.37341</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72039</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.37594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.71786</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3927</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3871</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5502</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3773</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.71667</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3797</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.37417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72444</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3691</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3629</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.37391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72258</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3883</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72131</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3883</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6512</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.728</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6689</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.662967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.377</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.726</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>monsoon sampling. The clams were collected randomly from the sampling stations using a 1 m &#215; 1 m transect during pre and post-monsoon seasons. Live clams found within the transect were counted in situ and weighed to the nearest gram and maximum width measured to the nearest millimetre in the laboratory. A transect is a square-shaped construct built with iron pipes of half inch thickness. The physico-chemical variables such as temperature and transparency of the water samples were measured at the sampling site where as other environmental variables such as dissolved oxygen, hardness, pH and salinity were analysed using standard methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref12">12</xref>] in the laboratory. The geographic coordinates of each sampling site were also recorded (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Multivariate Statistics</title><p>The environmental variables were normalised using the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76237-formula189"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where x is the variable and n is the sample size, to transform all the variables in proportion to one another. Significant differences, in the hydrographic variables between the proximal and distal zones were investigated using student’s t statistics. The dominant variable affecting the clam biomass in proximal and distal zones during pre and post-monsoon seasons was identified using factor analysis. The factor analysis generated the principal components, eigen values, percentage of variance explained by each factor, cumulative percentage of the variance in data explained by inclusion of successive factors and bivariate plots allowing inferences on relations between all variables and their variation. Stepwise regression analysis was also carried out on the variables measured to confirm the critical ecological variable affecting clam distribution in various zones across the seasons.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Remote Sensing Datasets</title><p>The Vembanad estuary is covered in four topographic sheets produced by the Survey of India numbered 58B/4, 58B/8, 58C/6 and 58C/5 &amp; C/1 of the year 1967 which are all large-scale maps. Satellite image of the estuary was obtained from LISS-III sensor of IRS-P6 satellite in LGSOWG (Landsat Ground Station Operators Working Group) format. The path, row and map ID of the image obtained are 099, 066, 58C/6 and 58C/5 &amp; C/1. The satellite imagery was processed using ERDAS IMAGINE 8.7 and ArcGIS 9.2.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Mapping Protocol</title><p>Protocol used for mapping the distribution of Villorita cyprinoides using environmental variables and satellite image was adopted from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref13">13</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The satellite images retrieved was geo-referenced with the topographic sheets available from Survey of India. The satellite images were then subjected to mosaicking where in the images were combined to form a single image. The mosaicked image was then subjected to image-to-image rectification with the topographic sheet. The visually interpreted and rectified images were then digitised and consequently subjected to inverse distance weighted modelling in conformation with the statistical analyses of the variables. The maps thus obtained of</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Protocol for mapping the distribution of Villorita cyprinoides</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x6.png"/></fig><p>the most correlated variables where subjected to overlapping to identify the deterministic variable in clam distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) Modelling</title><p>Inverse distance weightage modelling is a spatial interpretation technique of using points with known values to estimate values at other unknown points. This is a type of deterministic method for multivariate interpolation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The hydrographic variables of water at sampling stations in the distal fresh-wa- ter zone during pre and post monsoon seasons and that of the stations in the proximal brackish water zone during pre-monsoon season is summarised in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>T-test on clam biomass during pre and post monsoon seasons in the distal zone indicated a significant difference in the clam biomass between the two seasons (P &lt; 0.05). T-test on hydrographic variables in the distal zone during the sampling periods indicated a significant difference in the environmental variables between the two seasons (P &lt; 0.05). The post-monsoon season in the distal zone showed a higher mean temperature (31.55˚C &#177; 1.01˚C) in comparison with the pre-monsoon season (31˚C &#177; 0.53˚C) similar to the results reported earlier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>T-test on clam biomass sampled from the proximal and distal zones during the pre-monsoon season showed that there was a significant difference between the two zones. Similarly, T-test on the hydrographic variables sampled from the proximal and distal zones during the pre-monsoon season showed a significant difference between the zones (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>The measurements indicated that mean weight of the clam, Villorita cyprinoides, was more in the distal zone during pre-monsoon season compared with</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Hydrographic variables at distal and proximal sampling stations during pre and post monsoon seasons</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Seasons</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-monsoon</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Post -monsoon</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-monsoon</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Mar - Apr’08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Dec’07 - Jan’08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Mar - Apr’08)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proximal zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Distal Zone</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dredged area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-dredged area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-dredged area</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean of the variables/Stations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>1-10</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>1-10</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>1-10</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5 &#177; 0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.55 &#177; 1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 &#177; 0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9375 &#177; 0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.05 &#177; 1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 &#177; 0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transparency (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 &#177; 39.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305.5 &#177; 65.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.5 &#177; 53.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity (ppt)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0375 &#177; 0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 1.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25 &#177; 1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5 &#177; 1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22 &#177; 1.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biomass (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.5 &#177; 340.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >660.66 &#177; 565.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1203.1 &#177; 1460.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hardness (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2125 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.16 &#177; 2.61</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Length ? weight relationship of Villorita cyprinoides in dredged and non- dredged areas during pre and post monsoon seasons</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Seasons</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-monsoon</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Post ?monsoon</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-monsoon</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Mar - Apr’08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Dec’07 - Jan’08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Mar - Apr’08)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proximal Zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Distal Zone</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dredged area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-dredged area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-dredged area</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>1-10</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>1-10</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>1-10</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >490</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length range of samples (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2 - 3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 - 5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4 - 3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean length (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight range of samples (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8 - 22.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01 - 31.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08 - 20.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.85</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Variable loadings for the hydrographic variables in the distal zone</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor 3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transparency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hardness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biomass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eigen Values</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Cumulative variation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.33</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>that in the proximal zone where dredging was carried out (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The factor analysis for the pre and post-monsoon seasons in the distal zone of Vembanad estuary (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>) indicated that the first three factors explained 68.33% of cumulative variations in the variables measured, with eigen values of 1.76, 1.51 and 1.11 respectively. The first factor used in the analysis of environmental variables and clam biomass in the pre and post monsoon season in the distal zone identified that hardness, salinity and pH are positively correlated with clam biomass and distribution. For the first factor developed in this analysis, hardness showed the highest positive loadings (0.95) followed by salinity (0.21). In the second factor, DO showed a moderate positive correlation (0.68) with clam biomass followed by transparency (0.62). In the third factor, pH (0.49) had the highest loadings. Temperature is negatively correlated to clam biomass and distribution. Water temperature showed a negative correlation with salinity because of the large amount of freshwater run-off that occurred during pre-monsoon period.</p><p>The bivariate plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) indicated that, though the clam biomass had a positive correlation with hardness in the distal zone, the impact of dissolved</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Bivariate plot of variables in the distal zone during pre- and post-monsoon sampling</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x7.png"/></fig><p>oxygen and transparency on the second factor and that of salinity on the first factor could not be ruled out as a determinant of the clam distribution in the distal zone (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The step wise regression analysis of variables identified a combination of salinity, temperature and DO with adjusted R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.125 indicating their pivotal roles in influencing clam biomass. The relationship between the clam biomass and these hydrographic variables are represented using the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76237-formula190"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The mean dissolved oxygen observed in these stations during pre and post monsoon seasons in the distal zone were similar to earlier observations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref16">16</xref>] . The variations in this hydrographic variable may be due to the influence of primary production in the stations. The mean DO was higher in pre-monsoon season (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) which may be linked to the increased primary production during this period due to the possible optimum light intensity and the effective utilisation of nutrients by phytoplankton that were brought into the estuary along with freshwater. The low DO during post-monsoon season was similar to earlier observations, which may be due to the low primary production in the lake on account of high stratification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref15">15</xref>] . The mean salinity during pre-monsoon was more compared to that in the post monsoon season which is similar to the results reported earlier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref15">15</xref>] . The salinity was graduating towards the proximal zone where the brackish water is dominant. The zero salinity as experienced in the distal zone of the lake during post-monsoon at station d<sub>1</sub> and d<sub>3</sub> is due to the freshwater influx from the tributary of the pampa river.</p><p>Since dredging was taking place on the distal side (northern side of the bund) and not in the proximal zone, there was a possibility that the variation in clam biomass and the associated hydrographic variables in the distal might be different from the proximal zone.</p><p>The factor analysis of variables during the pre-monsoon season in the distal and proximal zone of the estuary indicated that the first three factors explained 72.10% of the cumulative variations in the variables measured, with eigen values of 2.18, 1.32 and 1.15 respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The factor analysis of the environmental variables and clam biomass in the distal and proximal zone during pre-monsoon season identified that DO (0.98) had the highest loadings in the first factor. In the second factor, hardness with loadings of (−0.85) had negative correlation with clam biomass whereas transparency (0.68) had the highest positive loadings (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). pH (0.99) had the highest loadings on the third factor. The bivariate plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) revealed that though DO was the only variable positively correlated to clam biomass, the highest loadings of transparency and pH on the second and third factor respectively and negative loadings of hardness</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Variable loadings for the hydrographic variables during pre-monsoon period</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor loadings</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor-1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor-2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factor-3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transparency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hardness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biomass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eigen values</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% cumulative variation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Bi-variate plot of variables during the pre-monsoon season in the distal and proximal zone</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x9.png"/></fig><p>in the second factor may influence the clam distribution during pre-monsoon period in proximal and distal zones of the lake. The decreased transparency due to dredging during pre-monsoon period and the consequent reduction in clam biomass could be observed. The stepwise regression revealed that DO and salinity act as crucial variables influencing biomass and distribution of clams as in the Equation (2) (Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.3) as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.76237-formula191"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Water transparency and temperature showed a negative correlation during pre-monsoon analysis. This may be due to the highly turbid water at the proximal zone, which is a dredging site and the high mean water temperature during the season. Similar results were observed previously by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref17">17</xref>] . Since solubility of oxygen is inversely proportional to temperature, a negative relationship was observed between temperature and dissolved oxygen during pre-monsoon. Hardness showed a negative correlation with salinity and a positive correlation with transparency in the second factor consistent with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref18">18</xref>] . The first factor clearly represented the positive correlation between dissolved oxygen and clam biomass as explained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref17">17</xref>] . The bivariate plots indicated that saline water and good DO are responsible for the survival of clams as observed earlier by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Environmental variables such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, transparency and hardness are important in deciding the distribution of an aquatic species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref21">21</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref15">15</xref>] identified salinity as the lone variable determining clam distribution in Vembanad estuary. But, the present study showed that other environmental variables such as dissolved oxygen, salinity and temperature are also responsible in determining clam distribution. The factor analysis indicated that dissolved oxygen, temperature and salinity were important in the distal zone during pre and post-monsoon periods whereas dissolved oxygen and salinity were the important during pre-monsoon period in the distal and proximal zones. These observations were mapped on a GIS platform using inverse distance model to interpret the results spatially.</p><p>The predominance of dissolved oxygen over salinity and temperature as represented in the bivariate plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) determined the spatial distribution of clam biomass during pre and post monsoon in distal zone. Dissolved oxygen showed greater affinity towards the tributary sink and bund region in spatial maps, probably because of increased turbulence at the sink point and water exchange at the bund opening during pre (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) and post-monsoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) seasons in the distal zone. The IDW model of salinity, in the distal zone during pre (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) and post monsoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0), showed lower salinity in the south (freshwater) and an increasing gradient towards the north to approximate marine conditions at the proximal end [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref18">18</xref>] . The marked decrease in salinity during post monsoon in the distal zone was very consistent with earlier observations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref15">15</xref>] . Since there is no marked variation in temperature across the</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of dissolved oxygen in the distal zone during pre-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of dissolved oxygen in the distal zone during post-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of salinity in the distal zone during pre- monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of salinity in the distal zone during post- monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x14.png"/></fig><p>distal zone in the estuary, IDW of temperature was not prepared. IDW model of clam biomass in distal zone in pre-monsoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1) was also prepared. The IDW model of clam distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2) during post monsoon in distal zone showed a gradually increasing trend towards south east zone of the estuary where a tributary of Pamba river enters the estuary. The IDW of clam biomass follows a similar pattern of spatial distribution of dissolved oxygen in the distal zone during pre and post monsoon season.</p><p>The spatial variation of the dissolved oxygen in the proximal zone during pre-monsoon season showed that dissolved oxygen in the proximal zone was low, on account of low transparency due to dredging as well as the suspension of dredged materials due to entrenchment. The dissolved oxygen was minimum near the dredger and it gradually increased away from the dredger as observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4 represents the spatial distribution of salinity in the proximal zone. The IDW model for salinity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) showed a marked increase in salinity towards proximity where the estuary converges with the Arabian Sea, as reported earlier by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref15">15</xref>] . The IDW model of DO in proximal zone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) indicated that DO of the water gradually increased away from the dredge site. The IDW model of clam distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5) showed that the biomass was negligible near the dredging site and increased gradually away from the dredger conforming to the results obtained from bivariate plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This is mainly due to the mortality of clams subjected to smothering due to entrenchment at these sites along with low transparency and DO. Due to various water and wind movements, the entrenched sediments are carried towards the proximal zone of the lake causing sedimentation of the dredged materials, smothering the live clams and thereby reducing survival rate.</p><p>The IDW representation of clam distribution in various seasons and zones indicated a parallel shift in the clam distribution in relation to the environmental variables emphasising the predominant role of the latter in determining availability of the species. The suitable habitat sites for clams during various seasons in the distal zone were identified using the IDW models of salinity and DO in distal zone during pre (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6) and post monsoon season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7).</p><p>The IDW representation of clam distribution in various seasons and zones indicated a parallel shift in the clam distribution in relation to the environmental variables emphasising the predominant role of the latter in determining availability of the species. The suitable habitat sites for clams during various seasons in the distal zone were identified using the IDW models of salinity and DO in distal zone during pre (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6) and post monsoon season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7).</p><p>The predictive spatial distribution map of clam abundance in the distal zone during pre-monsoon season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6) obtained by overlaying the environmental variables such as dissolved oxygen and salinity was similar to the results from IDW model of clam biomass in distal zone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). The predominance of DO over salinity as represented in the bivariate plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) was reflected both in the predictive map and the IDW model of clam abundance in the distal</p><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of clam biomass in the distal zone during pre-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x15.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of clam biomass in the distal zone during post-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x16.png"/></fig><fig id="fig13"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of dissolved oxygen in the proximal zone during pre-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x17.png"/></fig><fig id="fig14"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of salinity in the proximal zone during pre-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x18.png"/></fig><fig id="fig15"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5</label><caption><title> Inverse distance weightage model of clam biomass in the proximal zone during pre-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x19.png"/></fig><fig id="fig16"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6</label><caption><title> Predictive spatial distribution of clam abundance in the distal zone during pre-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x20.png"/></fig><fig id="fig17"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7</label><caption><title> Predictive spatial distribution of clam abundance in the distal zone during post-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x21.png"/></fig><p>zone during pre-monsoon season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1).</p><p>Similarly, the predictive spatial distribution map of clam abundance in the distal zone during post monsoon season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7) obtained by overlaying the correlated environmental variables was similar to the IDW model of clam biomass in distal zone during post-monsoon season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2). The predominance of DO over salinity could not be observed in the predictive map, or in the inverse distance weighted model of clam abundance, but a combined effect of the variables were observed in the predictive and IDW maps of clam abundance.</p><p>The crucial role of dissolved oxygen in clam distribution during pre-monsoon in proximal zone as represented in bivariate plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) was reflected in the IDW model in distal zone during post monsoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3). The predictive spatial distribution map of clam biomass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8) is similar to the IDW model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5). These predictive models not only identified suitable sites for clam growth as well as survival, but also helped in visualising spatially the impact of dredging on the clam biomass in the proximal zone of the estuary.</p><p>Most of the previous studies related to mapping of molluscan resources were used for identification of suitable sites for aquaculture, habitat mapping etc. But they failed in representing the seasonal dominant variables for predicting the biomass of clams and its fishery (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>The study is first of its kind, which attempts to map the clam distribution based on the responses to environmental variables and dredging. The study</p><fig id="fig18"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8</label><caption><title> Predictive spatial distribution of clam abundance in the proximal zone during pre-monsoon</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8401707x22.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Studies related to GIS and Molluscan mapping with the criterion for mapping and variables used</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Major activities during the study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Research output</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reference</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Development of a data driven method for identifying areas most suitable for hard clam aquaculture in Florida USA using GIS and SRS.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Identified areas of the Indian River Lagoon on the Florida east coast and Charlotte Harbor on the Florida west coast that suits hard clam aquaculture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Development of an optimum location selection technique to transfer mangrove oyster Crassostrea rhizophorae raft culture technology to selected coastal communities in Margarita Island, Venezuela.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiple Criteria Evaluation was used to generate a map of the optimum sites for oyster aquaculture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref23">23</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Building up a spatial database using those criteria which were considered to have any influence in integrating marine fish-cage culture within the tourism industry in Tenerife (Canary islands).</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Three model Criteria (distance to beaches, nautical sports, and view shed), which were mapped to show the most suitable areas for cage culture development in coexistence with tourism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Identification of the most suitable sites for hanging culture of Japanese scallop using geographic information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria evaluation models</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A series of GIS models was developed to identify the most suitable areas for scallop culture using weighted linear combination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref25">25</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Identify the zones of high clam abundance and develop a model to explain the impact of environmental variables and dredging on clam biomass in an estuary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Developed GIS based IDW-model for the temporal clam biomass distribution in the Vembanad estuary and also during dredging identifying the dominant variable controlling the distribution in each season.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present study is a combination of different strategies adopted by the earlier researchers with a better mapping protocol based on dominant variables. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.76237-ref26">26</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>identified the sites near to dredger and beyond the dredger to a few distances as unsuitable for growth and survival of black clam because the entrenched material gets settled after being carried by the underwater movements at few distances beyond the dredger. This shows that this area is unsuitable for clam growth and even for any clam culture activities in the near future. The area ahead of dredger (P<sub>1</sub>) is depicted as safe from the impacts of dredging. The study also predicted the clam abundance sites in the pre-monsoon and post monsoon season in the distal zone, where in the colour gradient of green exhibited the abundance of clam.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Monitoring the distribution of clam biomass during different seasons on the basis of environmental variables helps in identifying the availability of the species and monitoring the catches season wise. The study reveals the importance of monsoon-based seasons in the distribution of the species in the estuary. The study indicates a shift in the clam biomass during various seasons. The clam fishery management may be devised based on the spatial abundance and the present study shows a spatial distribution of abundant clam zones for a proper management.</p><p>Long-term monitoring programmes are essential for defining protracted trends of environmental degradation or climatic change. Unfortunately, few studies worldwide have considered continuous long-term data. This paucity of information on long-term benthic change prevails in part because of the high expense associated with collecting, sorting, and identifying benthic samples. Such cost constraints lead to compromising over the intensity, distribution, frequency and longevity of a sampling programme. Truly long-term data sets with high spatial and temporal replication are therefore rarely available. The study requires as suggested a data frame over long term in addition to a detailed study on the distribution of the food of the species to comprehend on the exact distribution pattern of the bivalve.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the support from Dr. V. R. Suresh, Director, Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan, Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Dr. Dilip Kumar, ex-director of Central Institute of Fisheries education for supporting the work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Paul, T.T., George, G., Dennis, A., Athira, N.R., Biradar, R.S., Khandagale, R. and Padmakumar, K.G. (2017) Ecosystem Responses in the Distribution of Black Clam (Villorita cyprinoides) Beds in Vembanad Estuary during Environmental Changes Using GIS and RS. Journal of Geographic Information System, 9, 245-266. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2017.93015</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.76237-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dias, F.J.S., Marins, R.V. and Maia, L.P. (2009) Hydrology of a Well-Mixed Estuary at the Semi-Arid Northeastern Brazilian Coast. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensis, 21, 377-385.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morrisey, D.J., Howitt, L., Underwood, A.J. and Stark, J.S. (1992) Spatial Variation in Soft-Sediment Benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 81, 197-204. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps081197</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diaz, R.J. and Rosenberg, R. (1995) Marine Benthic Hypoxia: A Review of Its Ecological Effects and the Behavioural Responses of Benthic Macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology, An Annual Review, 33, 245-303.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Newell, R.C., Seiderer, L.J. and Hitchcock, D.R. (1998) The Impact of Dredging Works in Coastal Waters: A Review of the Sensitivity to Disturbance and Subsequent Recovery of Biological Resources on the Sea Bed. Oceanography and Marine Biology, An Annual Review, 36, 127-178.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CMFRI (2015) CMFRI Annual Report 2014-2015. Technical Report, CMFRI, Kochi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sen, D.P. (2005) Advances in Fish Processing Technology. Allied Publishers PVT, Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gopal, N., Jeyanthi, P. and Chandrasekar, V. (2014) Production and Marketing of the Black Clam (Villorita cyprinoides) in Perumbalam Island, Alappuzha District, Kerala. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 61, 85-90.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">David, R.C. and Kirsty, J.S. (2005) Macrobenthic Community Responses to Long-Term Environmental Change in an East Australian Sub-Tropical Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 63, 315-331.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thrush</surname><given-names> S.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1991</year>)<article-title>Spatial Pattern in Soft-Bottom Communities</article-title><source> Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 75</fpage>-<lpage>79</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hewitt, J.E., Pridmore, R.D., Thrush, S.F. and Cummings, V.J. (1997) Assessing the Short-Term Stability of Spatial Patterns of Macrobenthos in a Dynamic Estuarine System. Limnology and Oceanography, 42, 282-288. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.2.0282</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harikrishnan, M., Vipin, P.M. and Kurup, B.M. (2011) Status of Exploited Fishery Resources of Azhikode Estuary, Kerala, India. Fish Tech, 48, 19-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA (American Public Health Association) (1992) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edition, APHA, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lomeli, K.C. (2011) Correlations between Fish Abundance and Physicochemical Parameters in Humboldt Bay, California. Dissertation, Humboldt State University, Arcata.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asha, C.V., Cleetus, R.I., Suson, P.S., et al. (2015) Environmental Factors Structuring the Fish Assemblage Distribution and Production Potential in Vembanad Estuarine System, India. International Journal of Marine Science, 5, 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pillai, V.K.K., Joseph, K.J. and Nair, A.K.K. (1975) The Plankton Production in the Vembanad Lake and Adjacent Waters in Relation to the Environmental Parameters. Bulletin of the Department of Marine Sciences, 7, 137-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haridas, P., Pratap, M. and Rao, T.S.S. (1973) Salinity, Temperature and Zooplankton Biomass of the Backwaters from Cochin to Alleppey. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, No. 2, 94-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yung, Y.K., Wong, C.K., Yaus, K. and Qian, P.Y. (2001) Long Term Changes in Water Quality and Phytoplankton Characteristics in Port Shelter, Hong Kong from 1988-1998. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 981-992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nair, P.V.R., Joseph, K.J., Balachandran, V.K. and Pillai, V.K. (1975) A Study on the Primary Production in the Vembanad Lake. Bulletin of the Department of Marine Sciences, 7, 161-170.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ravindran, K., Appukuttan, K.K., Pillai, V.N.S., et al. (2006) Report of the Committee of Experts on Ecological and Environmental Impact of Dredging at Vaduthala Kayal and Vaikam Kayal, Kerala.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muduli, B.P. and Panda, C.R. (2010) Physico Chemical Properties of Water Collected from Dhamra Estuary. Indian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mansor, M.I., Mohammad-Zafrizal, M.Z., Nur-Fadhilah, M.A., Khairun, Y. and Wan-Maznah, W.O. (2012) Temporal and Spatial Variations in Fish Assemblage Structures in Relation to the Physicochemical Parameters of the Merbok Estuary, Kedah. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 2, 112-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arnold, W.S., White, M.W., Norris, H.A. and Berigan, M.E. (2000) Hard Clam (Mercenaria spp.) Aquaculture in Florida, USA: Geographic Information System Applications to Lease Site Selection. Aquacultural Engineering, 23, 203-223.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buitrago, J., Rada, M., Hernández, H. and Buitrago, E. (2005) A Single-Use Site Selection Technique, Using GIS, for Aquaculture Planning: Choosing Locations for Mangrove Oyster Raft Culture in Margarita Island, Venezuela. Environmental Management, 35, 544-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0087-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez, O.M., Ross, L.G., Telfer, T.C. and Barquin, L.M.C. (2003b) Water Quality Requirements for Marine Fish Cage Site Selection in Tenerife (Canary Islands): Predictive Modeling and Analysis Using GIS. Aquaculture, 224, 51-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Radiarta, I.N. and Saitoh, S. (2008) Satellite-Derived Measurements of Spatial and Temporal Chlorophyll—A Variability in Funka Bay, Southwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 79, 400-408.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.76237-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paul, T.T. (2008) Mapping of Clam Beds in Vembanad Lake Using GIS and Remote Sensing. Dissertation, Central Institute of Fisheries Education.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>