<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2017.54064</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-75351</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Sufficient Conditions for Robust Stability of Discrete Large-Scale Interval Systems with Multiple Time Delays
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chien-Hua</surname><given-names>Lee</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Electrical Engineering, Cheng-Shiu University, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>759</fpage><lpage>765</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>9,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>April</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   The robust stability analysis for discrete large-scale uncertain systems with multiple time delays is addressed in this paper. We establish a method for selecting properly a positive definite matrix Q to derive a very simple upper solution bound of the discrete algebraic Lyapunov equation (DALE). Then, using the Lyapunov equation approach method with this upper bound, several sufficient conditions are presented to guarantee the robust stability of the overall systems. Comparisons between the proposed results with a previous one are also given. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Interval System</kwd><kwd> Robust Stability</kwd><kwd> Large-Scale System</kwd><kwd> Multiple Timedelays</kwd><kwd> The DALE</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is known that the system is called an interval system and can be considered as a system with parametric perturbations when matrices of a state equation are interval matrix. In practice, time delay(s) exist(s) in real-life systems and should be integrated into system model. During the past decades, the research of systems with time delay(s) has also become an attractive topic. However, surveying the existing ones, only few works have been devoted to stability analysis and/or stabilization controller design of interval time-delay systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref5">5</xref>]. Besides, compare to single systems, dimensionality of system equations of large- scale systems is higher and hence the control problems of large-scale systems are more complicated. In literature, many contributions have been devoted to the research for these kinds of systems during the past decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref10">10</xref>]. For large-scale interval time-delay system, it is seen that a sufficient criterion has been developed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref5">5</xref>] for the robust stabilization for discrete nonlinear large- scale interval systems with non-integral delays. Of those present works, control problems for systems with both time delays and uncertainties only have been discussed in few works [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref8">8</xref>]. In this paper, the robust stability testing problem for discrete large-scale interval time-delay systems is discussed. By using the Lyapunov equation approach associated with a very simple upper bound of the solution of the discrete Lyapunov equation, several delay-independent stability criteria are derived for the aforementioned systems. An interesting consequence is that these obtained criteria do not involve any Lyapunov equation. Comparison between the present results and a previous result is also made. It will be shown that the obtained results are better. It is believed that the present schemes are helpful for the controller design of large-scale interval time-delay systems.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Main Results</title><p>Consider the discrete composite interval time-delay system S which is described as an interconnection of N subsystems <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which are represented by</p><p><img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x3.png" />,<img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x4.png" /> (1)</p><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents the state vector, integer d<sub>ij</sub> &gt; 0 denotes the delay, A<sub>ijI</sub> = A<sub>iI</sub> for i = j, and A<sub>iI</sub> and A<sub>ijI</sub> are interval matrices with appropriate dimensions and have the properties:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula602"><label>, (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula603"><label>. (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Define matrices U<sub>i</sub>, V<sub>i</sub>, E<sub>ij</sub>, and F<sub>ij</sub>, respectively, as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4)</p><p>In fact, system (1) can also be represented as follows.</p><p><img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x11.png" />,<img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x12.png" /> (5)</p><p><img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x13.png" />,<img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x14.png" /> (6)</p><p><img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x15.png" />,<img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x16.png" /> (7)</p><p>where A<sub>i</sub> and A<sub>ij</sub>, respectively, is defined by</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. (8)</p><p>Here, ΔA<sub>i</sub> and ΔA<sub>ij</sub> denote the parametric uncertainties with the following properties:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (9)</p><p>where R<sub>i</sub> and S<sub>ij</sub> are defined as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. (10)</p><p>Then, we derive the following criteria.</p><p>Theorem 1. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, if</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula604"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then the composite uncertain time-delay system (1) or (5) is robustly stable</p><p>Proof. The condition (11) infers</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula605"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which can further implies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula606"><label>. (13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, we obtain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and this means the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is stable. Then, the following Lyapunov equation has a positive definite solution P<sub>i</sub> for any given positive definite matrix Q<sub>i</sub>.</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x29.png" />,<img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x30.png" /> (14)</p><p>Here, we choose Q<sub>i</sub> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula607"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an arbitrary positive constant.</p><p>Then, from the Lyapunov Equation (14), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula608"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Due to the fact that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, one obtains</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. (17)</p><p>Then, utilizing these inequalities, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula609"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting this inequality into (16), it is seen that if the condition (12) is satisfied then the right-hand side of (16) is a negative definite matrix. This means that the solution P<sub>i</sub> of the Lyapunov Equation (16) has the upper bound<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Here, we construct a Lyapunov function as follows.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula610"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the forward difference for the Lyapunov function (19) results in</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula611"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula612"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where (15) and the following relation are used.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula613"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, obviously the condition (11) can infer ΔV &lt; 0 and hence the composite uncertain time-delay system (5) is robustly stable. Thus, this completes the proof.</p><p>Following the same approach that proposed in the proof of Theorem 1, we have the following results.</p><p>Theorem 2. The composite uncertain system (6) or (1) is robustly stable if the following condition is satisfied for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula614"><label>. (23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Using the Lyapunov Equation (7) with</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula615"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then, let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula616"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is easy to obtain the stability condition (23). Details of the proof are omitted.</p><p>Theorem 3. If the following condition holds for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula617"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then the composite uncertain system (7) or (1) is robustly stable.</p><p>Proof. From (14), if we choose</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula618"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula619"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then the condition (26) can assure the stability of the large-scale system (7) or (1). We also omit the remaining proof.</p><p>Remark 1. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75351-ref5">5</xref>], a robust stability condition for system model (5) has been driven. We re-write it as follows.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75351-formula620"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where N<sub>i</sub> denotes the number of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponding to the ith subsystem with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, W<sub>i</sub> is defined by</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75351x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It is obvious that the condition (28) involves an inverse matrix and how to determine the positive constant β<sub>i</sub> such that (28) is satisfied is an open problem. Furthermore, it is assumed that all eigenvalues of A<sub>i</sub> are distinct. The conditions (11), (23), and (26) do not involve any inverse matrix and free variable. It is also not necessary to assume all eigenvalues of A<sub>i</sub> are distinct. Therefore, they are less restrictive than (28). Besides, we have found that the tightness of the obtained results cannot be compared.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusions</title><p>A new approach of the analysis of the robust stability for discrete large-scale interval systems with timedelays has been proposed in this paper. By utilizing the Lyapunov equation approach associated with a simple upper solution bound, several concise criteria have been derived to guarantee the robust stability of the aforementioned systems. The feature of these obtained results is that they do not involve any Lyapunov equation although the Lyapunov approach is utilized. Furthermore, comparing to a previous one, all eigenvalues of the system matrix A are not needed to be distinct in this work and the obtained results do not involve any inverse matrix and free variable. Therefore, they are less restrictive and easy to be checked. It is believed that this work is useful for the stabilization problem of discrete large-scale interval systems with timedelays.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, for financial support of this research under the grant MOST 105-2221-E-230- 003.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Lee, C.-H. (2017) Sufficient Conditions for Robust Stability of Discrete Large-Scale Interval Systems with Multiple Time Delays. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 5, 759- 765. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2017.54064</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.75351-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, Y.C., Chen, S.S., Su, S.F. and Lee, T.T. (2004) Simultaneous Static Output-Feedback Stabilization for Discrete-Time Interval Systems with Time-Delay. IEE Proceedings—Control Theory and Applications, 151, 445-452.  
https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-cta:20040713</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Han, J.F., Tian, H.Z. and Meag, Z.Y. (2010) Criteria for Robust Stability of Dis-crete-Time Dynamic Interval Systems with Multiple Time-Delays. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Qingdao, 2010, 890-894.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, C.H. and Hsien, T.L. (1997) New Sufficient Conditions for the Sta-bility of Continuous and Discrete Time-Delay Interval Systems. J. Franklin Institute, 334B, 233- 240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(96)00074-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stojanovic, S.B. and Debeljkovic, D.L. (2005) The Sufficient Conditions for Stability of Continuous and Discrete Large-Scale Time-Delay Interval Systems. International Conference on Control and Automation, Budapest, Hungary, 2005, 347-352. 
https://doi.org/10.1109/icca.2005.1528143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X.Z. and Liu, Y.Q. (1998) Stabilizing Decomposition of Interval Nonlinear Interconnected Discrete Control Systems with Nonintegral-delays. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1998, 3369-3370.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hua, C.C., Wang, Q.G. and Guan, X.P. (2008) Exponential Stabilization Controller Design for Interconnected Time Delay Systems. Automatica, 44, 2600-2606.   
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2008.02.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, C.H. and Hsien, T.L. (1997) Delay-Independent Stability Criteria for Discrete Uncertain Large-Scale Systems with Time Delays. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 334B, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(96)00053-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, X. and Zhang, H. (2008) Delay-Dependent Robust Stability of Uncertain Fuzzy Large-Scale Systems with Time-Varying Delays. Automatica, 44, 193-198.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2007.05.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, J.H. (200) Robust Decentralized Stabilization of Uncertain Large-Scale Discrete-Time Systems with Delays. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 113, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014809314463</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75351-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stankovic, S.S., Stipanovic, D.M. and Siljak, D.D. (2007) Decentralized Dynamic Output Feedback for Robust Stabilization of a Class of Nonlinear Interconnected Systems. Automatica, 43, 861-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2006.11.010</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>