<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EPE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Energy and Power Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1949-243X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/epe.2017.94B071</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">EPE-75333</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Transformer’s Condition Assessment Method Based on Combination of Cloud Matter Element and Principal Component Analysis
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qianli</surname><given-names>Hong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiantao</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qing</surname><given-names>Xie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shaodong</surname><given-names>Liang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuqin</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Si</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Weitao</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Beijing Electric Power Corporation, Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>State Grid Hebei Maintenance Branch, Shijiazhuang, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Electrical Engineering, North China Electric Power University Baoding, Hebei, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>04</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>659</fpage><lpage>666</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>March</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>30,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>April</day>	<month>6,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   With the development of power grid, as one of the key equipment, the transformer’s condition assessment method has always receive attention from experts, scholars concern more and more about the method’s practicality and reliability. In the traditional condition assessment method, due to the characteristics of the transformer’s complex structure, the assessment system is not comprehensive enough, or the assessment system is too complex, the indexes are not easy to quantify, such problems are emerging. The traditional method is complex and the degree of quantification is not enough. Therefore it is necessary to propose a condition assessment method that is easy to carry out the condition assessment work and does not affect the assessment results. In this paper, we propose a method to assess the state of the transformer’s complex structure. First, we establish a comprehensive assessment system, then apply the method of principal component analysis to optimize the index system, and then use the theory of cloud-matter-element. Finally the reliability and rationality of the method are verified by an example. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Transformer</kwd><kwd> Assessment Method</kwd><kwd> Principle Component Analysis</kwd><kwd>  Cloud Model</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>For a long time, as the important electrical equipment in power system, the transformer’s reliable and stable state is meaningful to ensure the safe and healthy operation of the power grid. While its condition assessment work is an important prerequisite to transformer’s operation. Assess transformer’s condition precisely is a basic work for subsequent work like condition based maintenance. Therefore if the condition assessment result is reliable depends on the assessment method.</p><p>At present, the research on the condition assessment method of the transformer has made some achievements. Zhang Jingjing and others have adopted the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to carry out the weighted evaluation of the condition indexes of the transformer on site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref1">1</xref>]; Liao Ruijin and others establish the state function of the evaluation index of the insulating oil test and the state function considering the difference of the initial value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref2">2</xref>]; Wang Youyuan proposed a comprehensive life evaluation model of the transformer based on the health level diagnosis technology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref3">3</xref>]; Zhao Wenqing and others proposed a transformer status assessment model based on Bayesian network [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Although the above methods have adopted the advanced method of transformer condition assessment, we can find that most methods are focus on the condition assessment process, they pay less attention to the condition indexes system of assessment process. Meanwhile, some existing assessment system is not comprehensive enough, and some are too complicated, they are all not good for the subsequent condition assessment. As for assessment methods, some indexes which are difficult to quantify also affect the results, therefore it is necessary to propose a more reasonable condition assessment method.</p><p>This paper first establish the condition assessment system of transformer, and then introduce the idea of principal component analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref6">6</xref>] to optimize the original system and build a system with less indexes. Then we use cloud-matter- element theory to assess transformer’s condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75333-ref9">9</xref>]. The result indicates after using the combination of PCA and cloud model method will not affect the true condition, which proves the feasibility and rationality of the method.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Establishment and Optimization of the Transformer’s Condition Assessment System</title><p>As the first step of the transformer’s condition assessment process, a perfect condition assessment system need to be built at the beginning. Every parts of the transformer may break down because of its complicated structure, meanwhile, different fault has different physical measurement, therefore, we need to set up a complete system. Meanwhile, a very complete system may be too complicated to do the assessment work, an appropriate method is necessary to simplify the system. Principle component analysis (PCA) is a suitable way to finish the process.</p><p>A. Construction of transformer and corresponding faults</p><p>On the basis of transformer’s structure we can divide a transformer into 6 parts: tank, winding, iron core, cooling system, tapping switch and bushing. We need to first figure out the corresponding part of fault type before establishing the system. Refer to</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Key faults occurred in a transformer</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >construction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >key failure</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transformer tank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil leakage, Partial discharge, Deformation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transformer winding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insulation drops, Abnormal resistance, Discharge failure, Short circuit fault, Winding deformation, Overload</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transformer core</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-point grounding, Insulation drops, Core deformation, Over excitation, Oil blockage, Magnetic flux leakage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transformer bushing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil leakage, Insulation damp, Porcelain sets flashover, Ageing, Partial discharge, Magnetic flux leakage, Insulation breakdown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transformer cooling system</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil leakage, Oil flow circuit unreasonable, Heat pipe clogged, Cooler outage, Fan exception</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transformer tap-changer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal action, Partial discharge, Tap connection error, Oil leakage, Insulation drops, Mechanical damage</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>B. Establishment of condition assessment system</p><p>The establishment of assessment system needs to seek fault’s corresponding physical measurement which could conduct as indexes of assessment system. However, because two different components may have same measurement, such as cooling system and tank all have temperature measurement, therefore we need to filter the main measurement before the assessment. According specialist’s suggestion and content of the summary, we can select the most important measurement to form the system, the initial system is as follows <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>C. Optimization for assessment system based on principle component analysis</p><p>Principle component method can apply in many aspects of multivariate statistical analysis. Its basic theory is to use ideology of decreasing dimension. We can build a new index system by using a certain of algorithm on the basis of multi-parameter and multi-sample data array. Though the quantity of indexes in new system decreased, they can reflex initial system’s information more intensively. The new index parameters are called principle component. The key steps are as follows:</p><p>1) Standardize p indexes value in n samples to obtain matrix Z.</p><p>2) Build correlation coefficient matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, calculate p eigenvalues:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then calculate their corresponding feature vector:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>3) Calculate variance contribution rate:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then sort rate and make sure that when first m indexes’ accumulating rate more than 0.85, we can regard these m principle components can reflect p indexes.</p><p>4) Calculate n sample’s principle component:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We can discover that there are correlation between new assessment indexes. The initial system could be optimized into a new compact system to asses on the base of PCA method.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Transformer Condition Assessment Method Based on Cloud Model</title><p>A. Determining the weight of index based on the combination of PCA and analytic hierarchy process</p><p>On the one hand, in the process of PCA mentioned above, accumulating rate can be regarded as principle components’ important level to transformer’s over-</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Transformer’s condition assessment system</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x7.png"/></fig><p>all condition, meanwhile, the component’s feature sector value can be seen as indexes’ weight, because in the steps of PCA, we choose the absolute value greater than 0.3 as the new index among feature sector, the absolute value could also be seen as indexes’ weight. On the other hand, the rate is calculated by samples’ value, therefore the rate is objective which could represent objective weight. We can use analytic hierarchy process to calculate subjective weight based on experts’ opinion on site. Finally we can use comprehensive weight method to calculate integrated weight, the main steps are as follows <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>B. Transformer’s condition assessment based on cloud model</p><p>The cloud matter-element model is an uncertain transformation model expressed by Li Deyi. The model is used to describe the qualitative concept and its quantitative representation. The model consists of three eigenvalues: entropy and super entropy. There are many indexes which are not easy to quantify directly except other quantifiable indexes in assessment system, such as tank’s oil leakage situation, mechanical vibration situation and so on. As for these indexes, we can use cloud model to simulate quantization. The main steps of cloud- model assessment method are as follows:</p><p>1) Establishment of indexes’ standard cloud</p><p>According to possible consequences of assessment, firstly we can divide the consequences into four class: normal, noticeable, abnormal, serious. Then we can define the interval upper limit and lower limit as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> before we calculate three eigenvalues. Two eigenvalues’ formula are as follows.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75333-formula512"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75333-formula513"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) Calculate the indexes’ correlation of cloud model</p><p>We can use this formula to calculate the correlation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75333-formula514"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Y represents x’ correlation value. We can calculate every class’ correlation of assessment index:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75333-formula515"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Flow chart of weight calculating.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x14.png"/></fig></fig-group><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is comprehensive weight calculated from last section, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is correlation of every class. Finally, we can determine the condition class by the principle of maximum membership.</p><p>C. Case study</p><p>This paper choose a power supply bureau’s 5 transformers before repair to make case study. Their original data are as <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, there are some indexes which are not easy to quantify among them such as “sealing condition”. According to 4 classes as mentioned before, we can rate them by using “1” “2” “3” “4” as responding 4 classes.</p><p>We can use PCA to handle these data and find there are 4 eigenvalues greater than 0:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. After sorting them we can find that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/75333x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> these 3 eigenvalues’ accumulating rate are greater than 85%, therefore they are the 3 principle components. Next we choose indexes whose absolute value is greater than 0.3 from every component’s eigenvector. The first principle component consist of 4 indexes: tank’s oil temperature, winding’s short circuit resistance, iron core’s total hydrocarbon content, iron core’s acetylene content; the second component’s indexes: tank’s oil pillow sealing situation, iron core’s hydrogen content, tap-switch’s action situation, bushing’s capacitance; the third principle’s indexes are winding’s absorption ratio, winding’s partial discharge, iron core’s co2/co ratio and cooling system’s fan situation. We can assess the condition by using these 3 principles. We choose 1# transformer’s state value to assess condition. The standard summary could tell us the value range of every index. Every index’s value range is divided into 4 classes as mentioned. The cloud model is as follow <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>According to the assess process, we choose new indexes’ variance contribution rate as subjective weight. Their values are as <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> after using AHP.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Cloud model of 1# transformer</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Index</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Noticeable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Serious</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >NO.1 Principle component</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tank’s oil temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66, 0.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70, 0.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74, 0.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78, 0.6667, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Winding’s short circuit resistance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005, 0.00167, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015, 0.00167, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025, 0.00167, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035, 0.00167, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron core’s total hydrocarbon content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145, 1.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155, 1.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165, 1.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175, 1.6667, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron core’s acetylene content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75, 0.0833, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25, 0.0833, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75, 0.0833, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25, 0.0833, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >NO.2 Principle component</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil pillow’s sealing situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5, 2.5, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron core’s hydrogen content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145, 1.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155, 1.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165, 1.6667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175, 1.6667, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tap-switch’s action situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5, 2.5, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bushing’s capacitance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005, 0.00167, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02, 0.00333, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04, 0.00333, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06, 0.00333, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >NO.3 Principle component</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Winding’s absorption ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35, 0.01667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25, 0.01667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15, 0.01667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05, 0.01667, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Winding’s partial discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75, 0.0167, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85, 0.0167, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95, 0.0167, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05, 0.0167, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron core’s co2/co ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5, 1.667, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20, 3.333, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35, 3.333, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45, 3.333, 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cooling system’s fan situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5, 2.5, 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5, 2.5, 0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Subjective weight</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO.1 PC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO.2 PC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO.3 PC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.263</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.347</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.216</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.124</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.266</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The comprehensive weight is as follows <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>Then according to cloud-matter-element theory to calculate indexes’ correlation value as follows <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><p>According to maximum membership principle we can find that the condition of the 1# transformer’s condition is “noticeable” which conforms to the actual situation. Therefore it proves that after optimizing the assessment system, using cloud-model method could keep the condition’s accuracy and simplify the whole assess process.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>1) The establishment of a perfect transformer condition assessment system is an important step of assessment process. We can optimize the system by using PCA which could not only receive reliable assess conclusion, but also decrease condition measurement. The method has its practical significance. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>)</p><p>2) Through the condition assessment method based on cloud-model, we could quantize all the indexes in assessment system according practical situation, plus, the objective weight calculated in PCA process avoids the abuse of only us-</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Comprehensive weight</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO.1 PC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO.2 PC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO.3 PC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.084</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.081</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Index 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.088</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.106</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation value of 4 ranks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Noticeable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.204</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abnormal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >serious</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Transformers’ original data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >PART</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >INDEX</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PART</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >INDEX</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4#</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5#</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >BODY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sealing condition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >IRON CORE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ground current (A)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil pillow temperature (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total hydrocarbon (μL/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Top oil temperature (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acetylene (μL/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Oil leakage condition</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CO<sub>2</sub>/CO ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrogen (μL/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water in oil (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SWITCH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Action situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >WINDING</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Short circuit resistance (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Noise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >BUSHING</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Capacitance (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insulation resistance (MΩ)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dialectric loss angle (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absorption ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partial discharge (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >COOLING SYSTEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congestion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DC resistance (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fan situation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ing AHP to calculate weight. The method also makes the process of calculating weight more reliable and easy. The combination of PCA and cloud-model makes the whole assess process more reasonable and effective.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hong, Q.L., Zhang, J.T., Xie, Q., Liang, S.D., Xu, Y.Q., Li, S. and Hu, W.T. (2017) Transformer’s Condition Assessment Method Based on Combination of Cloud Matter Element and Principal Component Analysis. Energy and Power Engineering, 9, 659-666. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2017.94B071</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.75333-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J.J., Xu, X.L., Ding, M., et al. (2017) A Condition Assessment Method of Power Transformers Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Power System Protection and Control, 3, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liao, R.J., Huang, F.L., Yang, L.J., et al. (2010) Multi - in-formation Fusion Model of Power Transformer State Evaluation. High Voltage Technology, 6, 1455-1460.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y.Y. and Chen, B.J. (2014) Transformer Health Status and Comprehensive Life Evaluation Model Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Power grid technology, 10, 2845-2850.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, W.Q., Zhu, Y.L., Jiang, B., et al. (2008) Condition Assessment for Power Transformers by Bayes Networks. High Voltage Technology, 5, 1032-1039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qi, M.F., Fu, Z.G., Jing, Y., et al. (2013) A Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Power Plant Units Based on Information Entropy and Principal Component Analysis. Proceeding of CSEE, 2, 58-64+12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names> H.Y.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Wang</surname><given-names> W.X. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>Application of Principal Component Analysis in Synthetic Appraisal for Multi-objects Decision-making</article-title><source> Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science &amp; Engineering)</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 467</fpage>-<lpage>470</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, Y.L., Gong, Z., Wu, Z.L., et al. (2010) The Application of Normal Cloud Model In Condition Assessment in Power Transformers. Journal of North China Electric Power University (Natural Science Edition), 5, 27-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, G.Y., Li, D.Y., Yao, Y.Y., et al. (2013) Cloud Model and Particle Calculation. Science Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fei, X., Li, F., Hao, Y.S., et al. (2012) A Synthetic Power Quality Evaluation Model Based on Cloud Matter Element Analysis Theory. Dianli Xitong Baohu Yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection &amp; Control, 40, 6-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75333-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shuai, J.Q., Zhang, L.Y., Zhang, Q., et al. (2012) Power Equipment Equipment State Maintenance Technical Standards Compilation. China Electric Power Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>