<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2017.53018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-75197</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Multivariate Statistical Analysis for the Assessment of Hydrogeochemistry of Groundwater in Upper Kambo Watershed (Douala-Cameroon)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rel</surname><given-names>Dechangue Tatou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Veronique</surname><given-names>Kamgang Kabeyene</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guillaume</surname><given-names>Ewodo Mboudou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Earth Science, University of Maroua, Maroua, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Hydraulic and Water Management, University of Maroua, Maroua, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rtatou@yahoo.fr(RDT)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>252</fpage><lpage>264</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>February</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>28,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>31,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The determination of the processes responsible for the mineralization of ground-water requires a large number of samples and physicochemical data, the treatment of which proves to be tedious. Many statistical methods are developed to facilitate the treatment of a certain volume of data. In this study, multivariate statistical analysis including principal components analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) have been applied on the groundwater physicochemical data of the upper Kambo watershed. The aim is to simplify the data in order to evaluate the relationships between the parameters and also to detect the factors that influence the water chemistry. For the PCA, three factors were retained representing 70% of the total inertia. Factor 1 shows the heterogeneity of sources of acquisition of the mineralization by the positive correlation with all the variables. Factor 2 indicates the dissolution of carbonates and anthropogenic input. Factor 3 highlights the silicate, anthropogenic and atmospheric or marine origin. The HCA enables to differentiate 4 groups of water according to the degree of mineralization. Groups 1 and 2 represent the most mineralized waters, dominated by calcium. The poor mineralized waters are groups 3 and 4 with the rather close contents in calcium and sodium.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Principal Component Analysis</kwd><kwd> Cluster Analysis</kwd><kwd> Groundwater</kwd><kwd> Upper Kambo Watershed</kwd><kwd> Douala</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Groundwater is one of the major water resources. If for a certain part of the</p><p>world, such as the arid zones, this resource represents a rare commodity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref1">1</xref>] , it is nevertheless available in significant amount in equatorial zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref2">2</xref>] . Groundwater is widely used for irrigation, industrial activities, drinking water and domestic needs based on bacteriological and chemical composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref3">3</xref>] . Several factors influence water chemistry including water-rock interaction, water dynamics, aquifer lithology, anthropogenic activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref7">7</xref>] . This field of research increasingly interests more researchers because of the importance of water in human activities. In Douala, groundwater has already been the subject of several studies focusing on quality assessment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref11">11</xref>] . Very few of them have used statistical methods for interpretation of data. However, multivariate statistical analyses are, in recent decades, more and more used to the contaminant data processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref16">16</xref>] because they allow treating a significant number of data for maximum information. Principal component analysis allows showing differences on the chemical characterization of the different poles of acquisition of the mineralization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref14">14</xref>] . HCA gives the similarity between two samples and the distance can be represented by the difference between analytical values from the samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>This study used application of multivariate statistical techniques for assessment of hydrogeochemistry of groundwater in upper Kambo watershed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study area is located in sub urban zone in Douala lying between 4&#176;00'29'' to 4˚02'08''N; and 9˚46'11'' to 9˚48'06''E (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It covers an area of about 5000 square meters. The main activities are small trade, breeding cattle and poultry. The density of the population is between 26 and 150 inhabitants per square kilometer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref18">18</xref>] . The climate is coastal equatorial-type with two seasons: a rainy season running from March to November and a dry season that runs from December to February. The annual average rainfall is 4000 mm for an average annual temperature of 26.5˚C. The driest month is February and the wettest is August.</p><p>Geologically, the study area is located in the sedimentary basin of Douala. This basin is made up of several formations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) which go from Albo-Aptien to the Quaternary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref21">21</xref>] . From the bottom to up, there are several formations constituted of basal sandstones which included conglomerates with basement elements, coarse and medium arkosiques sandstone, fine micaceous, carbonaceous and carbonated, sandstones, micaceous black shale, mudstones, limestone and marls [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref22">22</xref>] . Logbajeck formation consists of micro-conglom&#233;rats, sands, coarse and middle sandstones, rare intercalations of fossiliferous limestone and sandy clays, sandstone and sands with intercalations of marls and limestone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref22">22</xref>] . Logbaba formation consists mainly of sandstone, Sands and fossi- liferous sandy clays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref22">22</xref>] . Matanda formation is dominated by coarse Sands at the base and thin at the top, alternating with pockets of variegated clays,</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geographic location of study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x2.png"/></fig><p>sometimes interstratified with basalts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref19">19</xref>] . Wouri formation is characterized by gravels and coarse sands with argillaceous matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>In this area, soil is heterogeneous. It is noticed the ferralitic soils which are dominant, hydromorphic soils, little evolved soils and raw minerals soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref23">23</xref>] . The mineralogical contents of these soils reveal many alteration products such as kaolinite, gibbsite, quartz, illite, goethite, anatase, feldspar alkali and hematite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>In hydrogeological terms, two aquifer systems constitute the sedimentary basin of Douala [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref27">27</xref>] . The deep aquifer system made up of the basal sandstone aquifer and paleocene sands aquifer of thickness 200 m. The shallow aquifer system includes the aquifer of the mio-pliocene and quaternary alluviums aquifer. The mio-pliocene aquifers mainly consist of sandstone and clay sands that are the ones concerned in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling and Analyses</title><p>A total of 34 samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) were collected from 27 wells, 4 springs and 3 Drillings (bore wells) during 3 campaigns (February, 2013, August 2013, and March 2014). For points sampled 2 or 3 times, the mean of the results was considered. The samples were taken according to the mode of conservation for groundwater sampling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref28">28</xref>] . Water samples were kept in polyethylene bottles in capacity 1.5 liters. Before filling the bottles, they have been rinsed with water to</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Chronostratigraphic column of the Douala basin and major aquifer units [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref28">28</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x3.png"/></fig><p>remove. The filling was made to the brim before being closed. Samples were preserved in iceboxes in 4˚C before the routing in the laboratory. The physical parameters (temperature, pH, electrical conductivity (EC)) were measured in the field using a portable multiparameter, mark ANNA Hi 98128.</p><p>Chemical analyses were performed in the laboratory of soils and waters of the Institute of Agronomic Research for Development (IRAD) of Cameroon. The cations (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>) were analyzed by spectrophotometer of atomic absorption with flame. Bicarbonates (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>) were analyzed by titrimetry, Nitrates (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and sulphate (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) have been determined by colorimetry.</p><p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used for the recognition of reasons that can explain the variance of the important number of data and variables in- ter-correlated, and transform them into smaller series of variables in depended (principal components). In the study context, PCA is used to determine the</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Location of sampling sites</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x7.png"/></fig><p>possible contributing factors in the waters samples hydrochemistry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><p>Hierarchical Cluster Analysis was used to classify the samples into distinct hydrochemical groups. The Ward’s linkage method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref30">30</xref>] was used in this analysis. This method used a standardized space Euclidian distance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75197-ref12">12</xref>] . A low distance shows that the two objects are similar or closer, whereas a large distance indicates dissimilarity. In clustering, the objects are grouped such that similar objects fall into the same class Ten parameters (variables) measured (consisting of EC, pH, Ca, Mg, Na, K, Cl, SO<sub>4</sub>, HCO<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>3</sub>) were used in this analysis and 34 points.</p><p>Multivariate statistical analysis was applied to 10 observations and 34 sample points. The statistical analysis was performed using R software.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Hydrochemistry</title><p>The hydrochemical analysis shows that (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>): temperature of water in the study area varies between 25˚C and 27˚C for an average of 25.48 &#177; 0.46. The pH is ranged from 4.23 to 6.22 for an average of 5.01. The pH of the set of waters allows giving to these waters an acid character. This pH tends towards neutrality in certain wells and bore wells. It should be noted that the pH values encountered in the different water points reflect those of the waters in the Douala sedimentary zone. Conductivity in the water varies between 29.45 &#181;S/Cm and 404 &#181;S/Cm for an average of 177. Conductivity for the whole of water is low and water is thus not very mineral-bearing.</p><p>The calcium which is the more represented cation varies from 0.97 with 56.21 mg/l (average 12.83 &#177; 14.04) in the whole of samples. A significant dispersion is to be noted between the results of the various analyses. Magnesium is repre- sented in these water samples in small proportion. Its content varies from 0.75 with 13.2 mg/l (average 3.93 &#177; 2.46). Sodium varies from 1.58 and 16.64 mg/l (average 7.72 mg/l &#177; 3.99 mg/l). The potassium contains contents closer to those of sodium in the whole samples which lies between 0.97 and 16.4 mg/l (average 4.71 &#177; 3.28).</p><p>The analysis of the contents of cations shows that the importance order for the cations is Ca<sup>2</sup><sup>+</sup> &gt; Na<sup>+</sup> &gt; K<sup>+</sup> &gt; Mg<sup>2</sup><sup>+</sup>. In certain samples, sodium dominates. However the alkaline earth has a broad predominance on the alkaline ones. The bicarbonate contents vary from 1.72 and 181 mg/l (average 29.32 &#177; 37.36). With regard to chlorides, the contents as a whole lie between 0 and 78 mg/l (average 13.95 &#177; 14.72). In small proportion, the contents of nitrates lie between 0.1 with 9.89 mg/l (average 4.02 &#177; 2.75). Sulphates are the anions most slightly repre- sented. In whole samples analyzed, their contents go from 0 to 10.3 mg/l (average 3.58 &#177; 2.38). By considering the average of the contents in the whole water, bicarbonates largely dominate the others followed anions by chlorides, nitrates and finally sulfates (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>&gt; Cl<sup>−</sup> &gt; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> &gt;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Correlation Coefficient Analysis</title><p>The correlation matrix (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) established between the different parameters and the thirty four (34) samples, several observations were made: The higher positive values specify good correlation (&gt;70%) between the parameters pH- Calcium, sodium-potassium. A significant correlation (&gt;60%) is observed between pH-magnesium, pH-bicarbonate, CE-calcium, CE-magnesium, calcium-bicarbo- nates. Poor correlation or negative correlation is noticed between the other parameters. Among them, temperature is negatively correlated with other parameters.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive statistics for the groundwater physical and chemical parameters of sampling sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>-</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Units</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(&#181;S/Cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/l)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.885</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.975</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.745</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.36</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation matrix of the physic and chemical parameters of the study area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"   rowspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Due to the negative correlation between temperature and others, the temperature was excluded from PCA and HCA for good visibility of the results.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Principal Component Analysis</title><p>Principal component analysis (PCA) focused on the following variables: pH, Conductivity, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, temperature is excluded from this analysis because it is negatively correlated with the other parameters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The factor analysis generated three significant factors which explained 70% of the variance in data sets (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Factor1 (F1) accounts for 40% % of the variance in water quality of groundwater within the study area. It positive correlated with all variables. This shows that changes in dissolved ionic charges are entirely or partly related to variation in levels of these different ions. However, pH, EC, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), are highly correlated to this factor 1. Those five chemical elements (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) considered to be elements that control the mineralization.</p><p>Factor 2 (F2) accounts for 18% of the variance in water chemistry, positive correlated with Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and mainly dominated by NO<sub>3</sub> correlated negatively to pH, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, EC, et <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). This shows an opposition of carbonated pole to chloride pole. Certain proximity is noted between nitrates and sulfates indicate a common origin of these two ions which can be anthropogenic or atmospheric. This proximity is also noted between Na and K and to a lesser extent with chlorides indicates an origin related to the dissolution of halite.</p><p>Factor 3 (F3) accounts for 11% of the variance in water correlated negatively to Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and correlated positively to EC, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, et<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). There is a grouping between EC, pH, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, et<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>indicate a silicate origin. Chlorides as opposed to nitrate indicate an opposition of marine origin to anthropogenic origin.</p><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Projection of the hydrochemical variables on the F1 &#215; F2 axis (a) and F1 &#215; F3 axis (b).</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x32.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x33.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>Through these analyses, it is noticed that the process of mineralization in this aquifer system would be very complex due to its geological mixed context (silicate and carbonate), its proximity to the sea and the rapid infiltration through the formation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Cluster Analysis</title><p>Cluster analysis on the set of 34 samples is the dendrogram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) where four groups are distinguished. The different clusters identified from the dendrogram with more or less distinct characteristics (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>)</p><p>1) Cluster 1</p><p>Cluster 1 contains four samples ((17Ny, 30Ny, 36Ny, 72ND) characterized by relatively high mineralization but lower than cluster 2 (mean of EC: 186 &#181;S/Cm) and pH mean is 5.38. The dominating cation of this group is calcium while the bicarbonates dominate the other anions. The importance order of the ions is: Ca &gt; Na &gt; Mg &gt; K and HCO<sub>3</sub> &gt; Cl &gt; NO<sub>3</sub> &gt; SO<sub>4</sub>. In this group, bicarbonates largely dominate chlorides. Water points are Ca-Mg-HCO<sub>3</sub> type.</p><p>2) Cluster 2</p><p>This group is represented by seven samples (28Ny, 35Ny, 60Ny, 56Ny,</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Factor Loadings for water quality parameter</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F3</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.16</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Dendrogram showing clustering of sampling sites</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x37.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Physic and chemical characteristics mean for each group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group 3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group 4</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >278.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Projection of samples and parameters on the axis F1 and F2</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/18-2170384x41.png"/></fig><p>110ND, 3a, 5Ny). This group characterized by high mineralization. The electrical conductivity mean of this group is 278 &#181;S/Cm and pH mean is 5.64. As the Cluster 1, Calcium is the dominant cation while the bicarbonates dominate the other anions (Ca &gt; Na &gt; K &gt; Mg and HCO<sub>3</sub> &gt; Cl &gt; NO<sub>3</sub> &gt; SO<sub>4</sub>), but bicarbonate is less important than cluster 1 and in some samples dominated by chlorides. Water is mostly Ca-Mg-HCO<sub>3</sub>-Cl type. We also have Ca-Mg-HCO<sub>3</sub> water type.</p><p>3) Cluster 3</p><p>This group includes eight samples (9Ny, 12Ny, 86Ny, 58ND, 53ND, 61ND, 66ND, 76Ny). The electrical conductivity mean is 179.62 &#181;S/Cm and pH mean is 4.83. The mean rate of sodium for this group is more important than calcium, the mean for the bicarbonates is higher than the other anions (Na &gt; Ca &gt; K &gt; Mg and HCO<sub>3</sub> &gt; Cl &gt; NO<sub>3</sub> &gt; SO<sub>4</sub>). Therefore, samples of this group are Ca-Na-Cl type.</p><p>4) Cluster 4</p><p>This group includes 15 samples (47Ny, 70ND, 105Ny, 1a, 2a, 4a, 5a, 6a, 10SNy, 2SNy, 11SNy, 13SNy, F1, F3, F4). The electrical conductivity mean is 126&#181;S/Cm and pH mean is 4.71. This group characterized by low mineralization. Gap between sodium and calcium concentration is very low. However, sodium is more important in the majority samples than calcium. Order of importance of ions in water is Na &gt; Ca &gt; K &gt; Mg and Cl &gt; HCO<sub>3</sub> &gt; NO<sub>3</sub> &gt;SO<sub>4</sub>. Samples of this group can be considered as mixed waters with regard to cations. For the anions, chloride dominates bicarbonates and exception made in five samples (47Ny, 70ND, 105Ny, 4a, F4) where bicarbonates are dominated. In this group Na-Ca- Cl or Na-Ca-HCO<sub>3</sub> water type are distinguished. Increase sodium concentration in this group may indicate cation exchange in aquifer.</p><p>The link between the results of Cluster analysis and those obtained from the Principal Component Analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), shows that: Factor1 oppose high mineralized water to low mineralized water. Factor 2 axis allows identifying the chemical elements which determine mineralization in every group of water. In samples of the group 1, mineralization is controlled by Ca, Mg, HCO<sub>3</sub>, group 2 controlled by Ca, Na et HCO<sub>3</sub>, group 3 controlled by Na et Cl and group 4 controlled by Na, Mg, Ca, Cl or HCO<sub>3</sub>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Both applied statistical methods raised important information on the groundwater hydrochemistry of upper Kambo watershed. Principal Component Analysis shows that carbonate dissolution, silicates alteration, marine, air and anthropogenic input are the processes involved in the mineralization. HCA distributed water point into four groups according to the degree of water mineralization. Waters with low mineralization concern group 4 which include waters of springs, bore wells and the majority of wells. Waters of group 1 are influenced by Ca and HCO<sub>3</sub>. Group 2 is influenced by HCO<sub>3</sub>-Ca-Mg or Cl-Ca-Mg. Group 3 is under the influence of Cl-Na-Mg. In group 4, the facies are mixed; waters are HCO<sub>3</sub>-Ca-Na or Cl-Mg-Na type.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tatou, R.D., Ka- beyene, V.K. and Mboudou, G.E. (2017) Mul- tivariate Statistical Analysis for the Assess- ment of Hydrogeochemistry of Ground- water in Upper Kambo Watershed (Doua- la-Cameroon). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 252-264. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.53018</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.75197-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blinda, M. and Thivet, G. (2009) Ressources et demandes en eau en Méditerranée: Situation et perspectives. Sécheresse, 20, 9-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meva’a Abomo, D. (2006) De l’abondance des ressources en eau à la rareté de l’eau potable dans les villes littorales du Sud; un indicateur pertinent de la crise managériale de ces espaces urbains: L’exemple de Douala au Cameroun. Communication in the 7th International Conférence on Gestion Démocratique des bien Collectifs, 17 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasad, B.G. and Narayana, T.S. (2004) Subsurface Water Quality of Different Sampling Stations with Some Selected Parameters at Machilipatnam Town. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 3, 47-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, S., Titus, R., Pietersen, K., Tredoux, G. and Harris, C. (2001) Hydrochemical Characteristics of Aquifers near Sutherland in Western Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 241, 91-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cloutier, V. (2004) Origine et évolution géochimique des eaux souterraines du système aquifère des basses-laurentides dans les roches sédimentaires paléozoiques des Basses terres du Saint-Laurent. Thèse de Doctorat, Université du Québec, Canada, 321 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oga, M.S., Lasm, T. and Koffi Yao, T. (2009) Caractérisation Chimique des eaux des aquifères de fracture: Cas de la région de Tiassale en Cote d’Ivoire. European Journal of Scientific Research, 31, 72-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chaib, W., Bouchahm, N., Harrat, N., Zahi, F., Bougherira, N. and Djabri, L. (2013) Caracterisation hydrogeochimique des eaux geothermales de la nappe du continental intercalaire de la region de l’oued righ. Journal Algérien des Régions Arides, No. 12, 55-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndjama, J., Kuitcha, D., Tita Margaret Awah, Kamgang Kabeyene Beyala, V., Sigha Nkamdjou, L. and Ekodeck, G.E. (2011) Richesse spécifique et abondance bactériennes dans deux bassins versants (Mgoua et Bobongo) de Douala (Cameroun). JASE, premier semestre, 71-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eneke, G.T., Ayonghe, S.N., Chandrasekharam, D., Ntchancho, R., Ako, A.A., Mouncherou, O.F. and Thambidurai, P. (2011) Controls on Groundwater Chemistry in a Highly Urbanised Coastal Area. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5, 475-490.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngo Boum-Nkot, S., Ketchemen-Tandia, B., Ndje, Y., Emvouttou, H., Ebonji, C.R. and Huneau, F. (2015) Origin of Mineralization of Groundwater in the Tongo Bassa Watershed (Douala-Cameroon). Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 7, 29-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feumba, R. (2015) Hydrogéologie et évaluation de la vulnérabilité des nappes dans le bassin versant de Besseke (Douala, Cameroun). Thèse de Doct., Univ de Yaoundé 1, 254 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davis, J.C. (1986) Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Güler, C., Thyne, G.D., McCray, J.E. and Turner, A.K. (2002) Evaluation of Graphical and Multivariate Statistical Methods for Classification of Water Chemistry Data. Hydrogeology Journal, 10, 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-002-0196-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cloutier, V., Lefebvre, R., Therrien, R. and Savard, M.M. (2008) Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Geochemical Data as Indicative of the Hydrogeochemical Evolution of Groundwater in a Sedimentary Rock Aquifer System. Journal of Hydrology, 353, 294-313.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belkhiri, L., Boudoukha, A., Mouni, L. and Baouz, T. (2010) Application of Multivariate Statistical Methods and Inverse Geochemical Modeling for Characterization of Groundwater—A Case Study: Ain Azel Plain (Algeria). Geoderma, 159, 390-398.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montcoudiol, N. (2015) Contribution de l’hydrogéochimie à la compréhension des écoulements d’eaux souterraines en Outaouais, Québec, Canada. Thèse de Doct, Université Laval, 253 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, K.P., Malik, A., Mohan, D. and Sinha, S. (2004) Multivariate Statistical Techniques for the Evaluation of Spatial and Temporal Variations in Water Quality of Gomti River (India): A Case Study. Water Research, 38, 3980-3992.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BUCREP (2010) Rapport final 3ème recensement général de la population et de l’habitat au Cameroun. Répartition de la population résidant dans la province du Littoral par Département et par Arrondissement/District. Yaoundé, Cameroun, 45-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njike Ngaha, P.R. (1984) Contribution à l’étude géologique stratigraphique et structurale de la bordure du bassin atlantique au Cameroun. Thèse Doct, 3ème cycle, Université de Yaoundé I I, 131 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Regnoult, J.M. (1986) Synthèse géologique du Cameroun. Ministère des mines et de l’énergie du Cameroun, Yaoundé, 119 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nguetchoua (1996) Etude des faciès et environnements sédimentaires du quaternaire supérieur du plateau continental camerounais. Thèse de Doctorat, University of Yaoundé 4, Perpignan, 288.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SNH (2005) Synthèse sur le Bassin du Rio Del Rey et sur le bassin de Douala/ Kribi-Campo. Rapport interne, 14 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hieng, I.O. (2003) Etude des paramètres géotechniques des sols du Cameroun. Editions CLE, Yaoundé, Cameroun.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndome Effoudou and Priso Essawe Ndedi E. (2010) Minéralogie, géochimie et applications géotechniques des produits d’altération sur roches sédimentaires de Douala. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Yaoundé I, 210 p+annexes.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngon Ngon, G.F., Bayiga, E., Ntamak-Nida, M.J., Etame, J. and Noa Tang, S. (2012) Trace Elements Geochemistry of Clay Deposits of Missole II from the Douala Sub-Basin in Cameroon (Central Africa): A Provenance Study. Sciences, Technologie &amp; Développement, 13, 20-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, G. (1979) Alimentation en eau de la ville de Douala à partir des eaux souterraines. Etudes et travaux. Rapport BRGM, 79 AGE 021, 145 p+annexes.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SNEC (1988) Rapport technique sur les forages de Massoumbou. Société Nationale des Eaux du Cameroun.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DR-09-09 (2009) Modes de conservation pour l’échantillonnage des eaux souterraines. Québec, édition 2009-01-27 Révisée le 24 avril 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Voudouris, K.S., Lambrakis, N.J., Papatheothourou, G. and Daskalaki, P. (1997) An Application of Factor Analysis for the Study of the Hydrogeological Conditions in Plio-Pieistocene Aquifers of NW Achaia (NW Peloponnesus, Greece). Mathematical Geology, 29, 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769619</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75197-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ward Jr., J.H. (1963) Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>