<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msce.2017.53002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE-75080</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Properties of Elasticity, Thermology, and Anisotropy in Pd-Based Alloys
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kuankuan</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chunmei</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guannan</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhiqian</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Materials and Energy, Southwest University, Chongqing, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>03</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>March</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>28,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>31,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This work is devoted to investigate the elasticity, anisotropy, plastic properties, and thermal conductivity of PdSnYb, PdSn
  <sub>2</sub>Yb and Heusler alloy Pd
  <sub>2</sub>SnYb via employing the first-principles. The magnetic properties of Pd
  <sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn
  <sub>2</sub>Yb are obtained by the geometry optimization combining with spin polarization. And the stability of these three kinds of materials is ensured by comparing with the enthalpy of formation and binding energy. The Fermi energy has same trend with stability. The details of bulk and Young’s modulus are demonstrated in 3D plots, embodied the elastic anisotropies of PdSnYb, PdSn
  <sub>2</sub>Yb, and Pd
  <sub>2</sub>SnYb. The calculations of plastic properties are also anisotropic. And the minimum thermal conductivities are small enough for these three materials to be used as thermal barrier coatings.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>First-Principles</kwd><kwd> Pd-Based Alloys</kwd><kwd> Elasticity</kwd><kwd> Thermal Conductivity</kwd><kwd> Anisotropy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Heusler alloys are composed of a series of intermetallics. In recent years, plenty of magnetic properties that Heusler alloys presented and their applications in spintronic devices had aroused wide concern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref3">3</xref>] . The properties of Heusler alloys were well diversified, such as non-ferromagnetic elements could exhibit ferromagnetism after highly ordered [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref5">5</xref>] , 100% spin polarization were presented in materials which were called half-metallic ferromagnets (HMF) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref7">7</xref>] , only a minority of Heusler alloys containing rare earth had been reported to be superconductors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref10">10</xref>] , etc. These above features elucidated their potential for future applications in different fields.</p><p>As early as 1903, Cu<sub>2</sub>MnAl became the prototype of Heusler alloys, since F. Heusler [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref11">11</xref>] firstly reported Cu<sub>2</sub>MnAl and high magnetic ordered alloy of Cu<sub>2</sub>MnAl series. In 1969, P. Webster [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref12">12</xref>] discussed magnetic and structure properties of Heusler alloys systematically. Liu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref13">13</xref>] discovered another highly ordered Heusler alloy, which named Hg<sub>2</sub>CuTi. Up to now, more than one hundred kinds of Heusler alloys were found both in theory and experiments, such as Mn-based alloys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref16">16</xref>] , Co-based alloys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref18">18</xref>] , Cu-based alloys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref21">21</xref>] , Ni-based alloys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref23">23</xref>] . But the reports about Pd group Heusler alloys were relatively less and the majority of them were related to experiments. Kierstead et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref24">24</xref>] , Aoki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref26">26</xref>] and Stanley et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref8">8</xref>] studied the Heusler compound Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb and Pd<sub>2</sub>SnEr, whose superconductivity and antiferromagnetism were concomitant. Novel properties of thermodynamics and transmission were shown in Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb obviously. And the superconductivity presented at T<sub>c</sub> = 2.3 K, along with a synchronous phase of antiferromagnetism and superconductivity yielding at T<sub>N</sub> = 220 mK. The testing of elastic and inelastic neutron scattering for Pd<sub>2</sub>SnEr was carried out, which proved that Pd<sub>2</sub>SnEr turned into superconductor at T<sub>c</sub> = 1.17 K. Only when temperature conditions met T &gt; T<sub>c</sub>, the antiferromagnetic correlations would occur. The maximum critical temperature was found in Pd<sub>2</sub>YSn, which was revealed as the Heusler alloy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>However, in the aspect of theoretical calculation, there is no systematic research on elasticity, thermal properties and anisotropy of Pd-based alloys PdSnYb, PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb and Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb so far. In this work, we provide the overall calculation and analysis of these properties. Especially, once the thermal conductivity is smaller, the heat-shielding performance will be better. The computed minimum thermal conductivities of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are all less than 0.5 W・m<sup>−1</sup>・K<sup>−1</sup>. This minimum thermal conductivity is small enough to be applied to thermal barrier coatings and many other fields. Hence, the thorough discussion carried on the three materials is essential, which inspires our passion on studying these materials. And it makes great sense to explore the microstructure and properties of Pd-based alloys.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Calculation Model and Parameters</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Model Details</title><p>Pd-based system used in this work includes three alloys: Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb. The symmetry group and international table number of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and 216. PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are orthorhombic system. Their space groups are PNMA (No. 62) and CMCM (No. 63). In Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, Pd possesses the 8c site (0.25, 0.25, 0.25), Sn perches the 4a site (0, 0, 0), Yb possesses the 4b site (0.5, 0.5, 0.5). In PdSnYb, atoms of Pd, Sn, and Yb respectively possess the 4c site (0.28675, 0.25, 0.3988), (0.17329, 0.25, 0.07563) and (0.0176, 0.25, 0.69161). In PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, Pd and Yb perch the 4c site (0, 0.70228, 0.25), (0, 0.42899, 0.25), Sn possesses the 8f site (0, 0.14024, 0.04483). In order to obtain reliable structural optimization results, the lattice constants we employed are all from experiments.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Parameters Setting</title><p>CASTEP code [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref28">28</xref>] was used for this work, which grounded on the density functional theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref29">29</xref>] . The exchange correlation functional employed the PBE method in the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref30">30</xref>] . Ultra soft pseudo potential (USPP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref31">31</xref>] was chosen for interaction potential between ionic potential and valence electrons. The atom orbits Pd 4d<sup>10</sup>, Sn 5s<sup>2</sup>5p<sup>2</sup>, and Yb 4f<sup>14</sup>5s<sup>2</sup>5p<sup>6</sup>6s<sup>2</sup> were considered as valence electrons in the calculation of pseudo potential. The cut-off energy of 450 eV was set for plane waves in the wave-vector K space. For Brillouin regions k-point sampling, the Monkhors-Pack mesh was set as 4 &#215; 4 &#215; 4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref32">32</xref>] . The lattice parameters of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb were optimized successively by using the BFGS scheme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref36">36</xref>] . On this basis, the magnetic, alloy corrosion resistance, elastic, thermal conductivity and anisotropy are being computed.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Calculation Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Magnetic Property</title><p>The equilibrium lattice constants of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are obtained by geometry optimization with spin polarization. The paramagnetic (NM), ferromagnetic (FM) and anti-ferromagnetic (AFM) coupling between Yb atoms are taken into account in the calculations. Atomic initial magnetic order affects the convergence of ground state. Therefore, the different magnetic orders of Yb atoms are considered to ensure the convergence of ground state. In the condition of different magnetic orders, the curves of the relative energy are drawn out in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, whose minimum energy is set up to be the ground state (0 eV).</p><p>As the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shown, the energy of AFM-2 (each layer of Yb atoms spin in the opposite manner along the crystal orientation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>]) in Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb is higher than other magnetic orders. And this proves spin polarization displaying in Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb. However, the energy of NM in PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are the highest. It demonstrates the ground state of these three materials, which is in accordance</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The energy curve of NM, FM and AFM in Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x3.png"/></fig><p>with the experiments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref38">38</xref>] . The calculated magnetic moment value of each Yb is 2.4 μ<sub>B</sub> for the alloy composition Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb. The total magnetic moment of per formula unit for Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb and atoms Yb, Pd, Sn are all 0 μ<sub>B</sub>. As we can see, Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb is barely the magnetic one among the three Pd-based alloys. According to Mulliken’s bond population and length shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb contains the bond type Pd-Yb, which the other two alloys don’t. And the lack of Pd-Yb bonding maybe indicates the reason for appearing a transition from non-mag- netism (Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb) to anti-ferromagnetism (Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb). The bond population means the distribution of overlapping electron charge between two atoms. It is usually used to evaluate the ionicity or covalency of a bond. Compared with the positive values of Pd-Sn, the negative of Pd-Yb displays its iconicity, which is also connected with the magnetism in Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Structural Parameters</title><p>Based on the calculation of magnetic ground state in 3.1 Magnetic properties, lattice constant, volume, density, total energy, cohesive energy, formation enthalpy and partial experiment values of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. As we all know, GGA calculation usually overestimates lattice constants. On the contrary, the elastic constants are underestimated. Therefore, lattice parameters calculated by GGA are slightly larger. While the error is negligible, and the computed results still agree well with the experiment data.</p><p>For further details of the bonding properties in these alloys, the cohesive energy and formation enthalpy per atom of Pd, Sn and Yb atoms are defined</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mulliken’s bond population and length (Ǻ) of the Pd-based alloys</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >PdSnYb</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pd-Sn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pd-Yb</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pd-Sn</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pd-Sn</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The calculated lattice constants a, b, c (&#197;), volume V (&#197;3), density ρ (g・cm<sup>−3</sup>), E<sub>tot</sub><sub> </sub>(eV/atom), ΔH (eV), ΔE<sub>coh</sub> (eV) and partial experiment values of Pd-Sn-Yb</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref39">39</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PdSnYb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref40">40</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref41">41</xref>]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pnma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cmcm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.424</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.638</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.588</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.086</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.603</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.384</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >308.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >295.142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262.652</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371.627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >362.144</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.354</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.479</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>tot</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2022.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2430.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1846.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >∆H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >∆E<sub>coh</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.986</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>as the calculated Equation (1) and (2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula390"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula391"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, ΔH and ΔE<sub>coh</sub> respectively represent the formation enthalpy and cohesive energy of Pd-based compounds. E<sub>tot</sub> stands for the energy of a unit cell.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the energy of each Pd, Sn and Yb atom in the bulk state, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>show the total energy of insular Pd, Sn, Yb atom, respectively. x, y and z are the number of Pd, Sn, and Yb atom in unit cell.</p><p>It is clear that the calculated formation enthalpy and the cohesive energy given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> are negative: 0 &gt; Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb &gt; PdSnYb &gt; PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb. The results show that Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are all thermally stable. Among them, PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb is the easiest to synthesis and the most stable alloy. And Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, which has the poorest stability and reacts easily with Cl<sup>−</sup> or H<sup>+</sup> resulting in corrosion, is just on the contrary.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Fermi Energy</title><p>Fermi level (E<sub>f</sub>) also can be known as the Fermi energy. If the electrons accumulation in semiconductor is regarded as a thermodynamic system, the statistic theory has been proved that Fermi energy is the electronic chemical potential of this system.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula392"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in which μ is the chemical potential, F is the free energy, N represents the total number of electrons, T is temperature.</p><p>The corrosion behavior on alloys is complicated. In the light of the electron theory, each fermion obeys Fermi-Dirac statistics. According to Pauli exclusion- principle, the minimal energy principle, and Hund rule, fermion occupies the quantum state respectively. On behalf of the top level of electron filling, Fermi energy loses electron in the first. And the higher Fermi level reaches, the easier outermost shells are to lose.</p><p>Fermi energy of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Due to the different types and structures of the system, Fermi level is different in the ground state. Corrosion potential is bound on with the Fermi level. So the higher Fermi level reaches, the smaller corrosion potential will be. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the Fermi energy (E<sub>f</sub>) values of these compounds with E<sub>f</sub> (PdSnYb) &gt; E<sub>f</sub> (Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb) &gt; E<sub>f</sub> (PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb) indicate that PdSnYb is most likely to lose electrons, while PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb is difficult. Their corrosion potential and complexity of corroding are in the order of PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb &gt; Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb &gt; PdSnYb.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Elastic Property</title><p>The reaction to external stress in the elastic limit of crystal lattice can be charac-</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Fermi energy of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x15.png"/></fig><p>terized by elastic constants. It’s of important significant on the stability and stiffness of materials. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> lists the elastic constants of these three alloys. The elastic constants of cubic and orthorhombic system need to satisfy the generalized stability criteria which can be expressed as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref44">44</xref>] :</p><p>For cubic phase (Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula393"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For orthorhombic phase (PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula394"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula395"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the mentioned Pd-based alloys are stable in mechanics, due to the elastic constants satisfy the corresponding stability criterions.</p><p>It’s well known that the elastic constants C<sub>11</sub> and C<sub>33</sub> are depicted as the ability to resist linear compression along x and z-axis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref45">45</xref>] . The present C<sub>11</sub> is equal to C<sub>33</sub> in Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, indicating that the compression of x and z-axis is isotropy. The largest C<sub>11</sub> of PdSnYb implies that it is the most incompressible material along x-axes obviously. For PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, the value of C<sub>33</sub> is slightly higher than the C<sub>11</sub>, which indicates that the z-axis is less compressible than x-axis. The calculated elastic constants of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb follow the order:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, suggesting the anisotropies of shear moduli for Pd-based intermetallics are relatively weak. The PdSnYb is in the order of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus, the bonding strength of adjacent atoms are the highest in (1 0 0) plane. The present C<sub>22</sub> is higher than the C<sub>11</sub> and C<sub>22</sub> for PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb. Therefore, the bonding strength of (0 1 0) plane is higher than (1 0 0) and (0 0 1) planes. In conclusion, all the three compounds have the highest binding strength in (1 0 0) plane.</p><p>Additionally, C<sub>44</sub>, which measures the ability to resist monoclinic shear strain</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Elastic constants (GPa) of the three Pd-Sn-Yb</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>11</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>22</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>33</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>44</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>55</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>66</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>12</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>13</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>23</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PdSnYb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>in (1 0 0) plane, is a vital parameter indirectly affecting the indentation hardness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref46">46</xref>] . The highest C<sub>44</sub> for PdSnYb indicates that it has the strongest resistance to shear deformation in (1 0 0) plane. The equation (C<sub>12</sub>-C<sub>44</sub>) is a classical representation of Cauchy pressure. When the value of Cauchy pressure is positive, it reveals the material is ductile, whereas the negative value represents brittleness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref47">47</xref>] . The computed Cauchy pressure for Pd-based intermetallics follows this order: PdSnYb (232 GPa) &gt; PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb (93 GPa) &gt; PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb (60 GPa) &gt; 0. The largest value of Cauchy pressure for PdSnYb and the smallest one for PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb manifest PdSnYb is the most ductile structure and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb is the least one.</p><p>For the polycrystalline system, elastic modulus can be got via independent elastic constants. In order to obtain the bulk modulus and shear modulus, we consult the Voigt and Reuss models. Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref44">44</xref>] sums up the expressions of bulk and shear modulus for different systems:</p><p>For cubic phase (Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula396"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula397"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula398"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For orthorhombic phase (PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula399"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula400"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula401"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula402"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which represent the bulk modulus and shear modulus respectively, are calculated by Voigt and Reuss approximation.</p><p>According to the extreme value principle, the Reuss’s and Voigt’s models have been proved to be the lower and upper limits of the elastic constant by Hill [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref48">48</xref>] . The formula called Voigt-Reuss-Hill (VRH) agrees well with the experiments:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula403"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula404"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where B and G represent the bulk and shear modulus.</p><p>The value of bulk modulus and shear modulus, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio using Hill’s models are obtained:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula405"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula406"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Melting point, characterizing the thermodynamic stability of alloy, has always been considered as an important parameter. Deduced from Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref49">49</xref>] , the melting temperature of materials, which is closely related to elastic constants, is estimated as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula407"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> lists the elastic modulus (GPa), bulk modulus (GPa), shear modulus (GPa), Poisson’s ratio ν, Pugh modules ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the melting temperature (˚C) of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb.</p><p>Generally, the bulk modulus reflects the average values of bonding strength and the ability to resist volume change. Shear modulus measures the resistance to plastic deformation. As <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shown, the bulk modulus is in the sequence of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb (106 GPa) &gt; PdSnYb (71 GPa) &gt; PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb (45 GPa), indicating Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb is the least compressible material in all structures. However, the shear moduli of them are almost the same. Young’s modulus serves as a measure of the stiffness. The higher the Young’s modulus is, the stiffer the material will be.</p><p>Poisson’s ratio ν and Pugh modules ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> further confirm the brittleness and ductility of materials. Poisson’s ratio v reflects the elastic parameter of uniaxial deformation, especially in atom binding force. With 0.5 as the critical point, Poisson’s ratio v = 0.5 suggests the constancy of volume. When the variation of v is between 0.25 - 0.5, the atom binding force is central force. The v value</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The calculated values for elastic modulus (GPa), bulk modulus (GPa), shear modulus (GPa), Poisson’s ratio and Pugh modules ratio<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, melting temperature T<sub>m</sub> (˚C)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PdSnYb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E (GPa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref100">100</xref>] (GPa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref010">010</xref>] (GPa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>] (GPa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B (GPa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G (GPa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.030</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.049</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.379</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.387</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.483</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.291</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.330</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.267</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.551</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>m</sub> (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >984</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >747</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>for Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb is higher than 0.25, which shows the atomic forces are remarkably central forces. Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb presents the largest v, reflecting its resistance of shear strain is the weakest. In accordance with Pugh’s criterion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref50">50</xref>] , material with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is brittle; whereas material with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> shows ductility. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the G/B ratios of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are less than 0.57. Thus, these three alloys are deemed to be ductility. The melting point of alloys is implied its thermodynamic stability. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> the melting temperature of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are 984˚C, 1230˚C, 747˚C, respectively, which further verifies the stability.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Anisotropy</title><sec id="s3_5_1"><title>3.5.1. Elastic Anisotropy</title><p>It is well known that single crystal is anisotropic, which has great influence on the performance of thin-film materials. So how to characterize the degree of anisotropic is necessary. To obtain the anisotropic degree of Pd-based alloys, the two-dimensional images of shear modulus of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the two quarter circles with radius of 50 and 100 in</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Two-dimensional graphs of the shear modulus (GPa) in Pd-Sn-Yb alloys. (a) Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, (b) PdYbSn, (c) YbSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x51.png"/></fig><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, which are labeled in black solid line, mean isotropy and play a supporting role in estimating the anisotropic degree.</p><p>The share modulus G on different plane along different directions can be expressed as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref51">51</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula408"><label>(001) plane from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref100">100</xref>] to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref010">010</xref>]: (18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula409"><label>(100) plane from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref100">100</xref>] to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref010">010</xref>]: (19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula410"><label>(010) plane from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref100">100</xref>] to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref010">010</xref>]: (20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) plane from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>] to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref110">110</xref>]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula411"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(110) plane from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>] to [<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula412"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in which θ represent the angle between [uvw] direction and [HKL] direction.</p><p>As we can see in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a), the shear modulus of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb in (001), (100), and (010) trajectory planes are similar to the quarter circles, which imply that Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb shows almost isotropy in these planes. On the curves of (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) plane from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>] to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref110">110</xref>] and (110) plane from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>] to [<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>], shear modulus show obviously anisotropy of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb. For PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, shear modulus are all anisotropy due to the noncircular plots on the mentioned planes along different directions. To take a panoramic view of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, shear modulus is the smallest on (110) plane, which suggests it may be the glide plane of Pd-based alloys.</p><p>In order to clearly illustrate the anisotropies of mechanical modulus for Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, we plot three dimensional surfaces of modulus in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. For bulk modulus and Young’s modulus, the 3D plots can be more intuitive to determine the ability to withstand external stress. Their formulas are as follow:</p><p>bulk modulus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref52">52</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula413"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Young’s modulus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref53">53</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula414"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the elastic compliance coefficient and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>re- present the directional cosine.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, the bulk modulus of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb is spherical, reflecting isotropy of the bulk modulus. The three dimensional graphs of bulk modulus of PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, and Young’s modulus of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb are irregularly. Thus, they express anisotropic nature, as well as the PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb performs the strongest anisotropy. Conversely, Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb is isotropy, which is in good agreement with the</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Three-dimensional stereograms of the bulk modulus and Young’s modulus (GPa) of Pd-Sn-Yb</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x68.png"/></fig><p>calculated anisotropy of shear modulus in the present work. Compared with bulk modulus, the projections of Young’s modulus on the (100), (010) and (001) planes show a more pronounced anisotropy. Therefore, a stronger directional dependence of Young’s modulus has displayed on these planes.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5_2"><title>3.5.2. Ideal Strength of Tensile and Shear Deformation</title><p>It is essential to comprehend the causation of the structural stability for the design and application of these Pd-based alloys, especially the response of lattice stress to the applied strain. To analysis the mechanism of mechanical deformation, the stress-strain curves of tensile and shear deformation are performed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>For tensile deformation, the strain directions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref100">100</xref>], [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref010">010</xref>], [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>] are parallel to the coordinate axis of the corresponding unit cell. From Figures 5(a)-(c), the tensile strengths of PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb show anisotropy. And the strongest ideal tensile strengths of these two alloys exist in the strain direction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>]. Due to the different symmetry of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb compared with PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, it’s isotropic along the strain direction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref100">100</xref>], [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref010">010</xref>], and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref001">001</xref>]. The yielding stage of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb in different orientations all occurs in 2% strains.</p><p>It can be seen in the Figures 5(d)-(f) that the shear moduli can be obtained from the strains less than 2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref54">54</xref>] . On the basis of this linear parts, the computed</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The tensile and shear stress-strain curves of Pd-based alloys along different directions</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x69.png"/></fig><p>shear moduli values are</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for PdSnYb and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, respectively. In contrast with the results using Voigt-Reuss-Hill method, they are not accord, which proves that they are all anisotropic in the whole crystal of the three structures.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. The Minimum Value of Thermal Conductivity K<sub>min</sub></title><p>The thermal conductivity is a measure of material’s heat conduction ability. Therefore, the research on it of Pd-based alloys in this work is significant.</p><p>Owing to the lattice vibration influences the crystal macroscopic thermodynamic properties, the lattice vibration becomes important factors we want to know. And lattice vibration is determined by phonon system. Thus it has great significance to the materials’ thermal conductivity. The transverse acoustic wave velocity (v<sub>t</sub>), longitudinal acoustic wave velocity (v<sub>l</sub>), and wave velocity (v<sub>m</sub>) are calculated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref55">55</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula415"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula416"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.75080-formula417"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the condition of high temperature, the value of thermal conductivity will decrease with increasing temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref56">56</xref>] . Hence the minimum thermal conductivity value for materials in the applications of high temperature is extremely important. The minimum thermal conductivity of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb, and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb is calculated on the basis of Clark’s model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref56">56</xref>] and Cahill’s model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref57">57</xref>] :</p><p>Clark’s Model:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (28)</p><p>Cahill’s Model:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (29)</p><p>where k<sub>B</sub> represents Boltzmann’s constant, Ma is the average mass of atoms, E is the Young’s modulus, ρ is density, v<sub>n</sub> (n = 1, 2, 3) is acoustic wave velocity, p is the number of atoms in unit volume. All the indexes are calculated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. The thermal conductivity for cubic ZrO<sub>2</sub> is also calculated, aiming to compare the value with the experimental value to confirm the accuracy of the calculation method.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, the calculated thermal conductivity using the Cahill’s model is lightly greater than that computed by the Clark’s model. This is due to the atom number density and phonon spectrum are both considered in Cahill’s model, whereas the Clark’s model does not [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref58">58</xref>] . Thus, the Clark’s model underestimates the thermal conductivity, however the value adopting Cahill’s model gets closer to the real values of thermal conductivity. In comparison with Clark’s model, the Cahill’s value of ZrO<sub>2</sub> is closer to the experimental value, which confirms this calculation method is credible. As for Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, the minimum thermal conductivity is largest, and that for PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb is the smallest. Compared to the results in the present work, the increasing content of Sn atoms cause the decreasing in minimum thermal conductivity, when the proportion of Pd/Sn ratios modify. As is known to all, the Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-stabilized ZrO<sub>2</sub> (~2.2 W・m<sup>−1</sup>・K<sup>−1</sup>) are investigated for application as materials for thermal barrier coatings. Based on the accuracy of the calculation method, the calculated minimum thermal conductivities of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are all at least a quarter less than ZrO<sub>2</sub>,</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Transverse speed v<sub>t</sub> (km・s<sup>−1</sup>), longitudinal speed v<sub>1</sub> (km・s<sup>−1</sup>), acoustic speed v<sub>m</sub> (km・s<sup>−1</sup>) for Pd-Sn-Yb, and the minimum thermal conductivities K<sub>min</sub> (W・m<sup>−1</sup>・K<sup>−1</sup>) of Cahill’s Model, Clark’s Model for Pd-Sn-Yb and ZrO<sub>2</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >v<sub>t</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >v<sub>l</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >v<sub>m</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chill</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clark</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>min</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>min</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3572</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1717</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PdSnYb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1635</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2902</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1819</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZrO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7774</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4675</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75080-ref59">59</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>which show Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb can be used for high-temperature- resistant materials, aerospace field, and many other fields.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The calculated results showed that the AFM-2 state of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb and the NM state of PdSnYb, PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are found to be the ground state, which are agreed with experimental reports. The obtained enthalpy of formation and binding energy are in the order: 0 &gt; Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb &gt; PdSnYb &gt; PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb, indicating that the Pd-based alloys are mechanically stable. The Fermi energy (E<sub>f</sub>) values of these compounds with E<sub>f</sub> (PdSnYb) &gt; E<sub>f</sub> (Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb) &gt; E<sub>f</sub> (PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb) imply that PdSnYb is most likely to lose electrons while PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb is difficult. In line with the Cauchy pressure, values of Poisson’s ratio ν, and Pugh modules ratio<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740435x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, these three alloys are deemed to be ductility. The three compounds are all elastic anisotropic, and the anisotropic sequence is PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb &gt; PdSnYb &gt; Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb. The ideal strength of tensile and shear deformation are inconformity in different crystal orientations, implying that Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, and Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb are plastic anisotropic. Moreover, the calculated minimum thermal conductivities of Pd<sub>2</sub>SnYb, PdSnYb and PdSn<sub>2</sub>Yb are all at least a quarter less than that of ZrO<sub>2</sub>, the usual thermal barrier coatings materials. That implies these Pd-based alloys can be candidates for high-temperature-resistant materials.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2016D043).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Chen, K.K., Hu, M., Li, C.M., Li, G.N. and Chen, Z.Q. (2017) The Properties of Elasticity, Thermology, and Anisotropy in Pd-Based Alloys. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 5, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2017.53002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.75080-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Felser, C., Fecher, G.H. and Balke, B. (2007) Spintronics: A Challenge for Materials Science and Solid-State Chemistry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46, 668-699.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200601815</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barth, J., Fecher, G.H., Balke, B., Graf, T., Shkabko, A., Weidenkaff, A. and Ueda, S. (2011) Anomalous Transport Properties of the Half-Metallic Ferromagnets Co2TiSi, Co2TiGe and Co2TiSn. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369, 3588-3601. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, V., Solanki, A.K. and Kashyap, A. (2010) Electronic, Magnetic and Transport Properties of Co2TiZ (Z= Si, Ge and Sn): A First-Principle Study. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 322, 2922-2928. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.05.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pierre, J., Skolozdra, R.V., Gorelenko, Y.K. and Kouacou, M. (1994) From Nonmagnetic Semiconductor to Itinerant Ferromagnet in the TiNiSn-TiCoSn Series. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 134, 95-105. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(94)90078-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, L.L., Miao, L., Wang, Z.Y., Wei, W., Xiong, R., Liu, H.J. and Tang, X.F. (2009) Thermoelectric Performance of Half-Heusler Compounds TiNiSn and TiCoSb. Journal of Applied Physics, 105, Article ID: 013709. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3056384</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raphael, M.P., Ravel, B., Huang, Q., Willard, M.A., Cheng, S.F., Das, B.N. and Harris, V.G. (2002) Presence of Antisite Disorder and Its Characterization in the Predicted Half-Metal Co2MnSi. Physical Review B, 66, Article ID: 104429. 
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.104429</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Umetsu, R.Y., Kobayashi, K., Kainuma, R., Fujita, A., Fukamichi, K., Ishida, K. and Sakuma, A. (2004) Magnetic Properties and Band Structures of Half-Metal-Type Co2Cr Ga Heusler Alloy. Applied physics letters, 85, 2011-2013. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1790029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stanley, H.B., Lynn, J.W., Shelton, R.N. and Klavins, P. (1987) Antiferromagnetic Structure of the Cubic Superconductor ErPd2Sn. Journal of Applied Physics, 61, 3371-3373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.338775</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D&amp;ouml;nni, A., Fischer, P., Fauth, F., Convert, P., Aoki, Y., Sugawara, H. and Sato, H. (1999) Antiferromagnetic Ordering in the Cubic Superconductor YbPd2Sn. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 259, 705-706.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(98)01081-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jeong, T. and Kwon, Y. (2007). Ab-Initio Studies on the Electronic Structure of Y bPd2Sn. Solid State Communications, 143, 429-431. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2007.06.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heusler, F. (1904) &amp;UUML;ber Manganbronze und &amp;uuml;ber die Synthese magnetisierbarer Legierungen aus unmagnetischen Metallen. Angewandte Chemie, 17, 260-264.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.19040170903</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Webster, P.J. (1969) Heusler Alloys. Contemporary Physics, 10, 559-577.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00107516908204800</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, G.D., Dai, X.F., Yu, S.Y., Zhu, Z.Y., Chen, J.L., Wu, G.H., Xiao, J.Q., et al. (2006) Physical and Electronic Structure and Magnetism of Mn2NiGa: Experiment and Density-Functional Theory Calculations. Physical Review B, 74, Article ID: 054435. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.054435</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weht, R. and Pickett, W.E. (1999) Half-Metallic Ferrimagnetism in Mn2VAl. Physical Review B, 60, Article ID: 13006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.13006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;Ouml;zdogan, K., Galanakis, I., Sasioglu, E. and Aktas, B. (2006) Search for Half-Metallic Ferrimagnetism in V-Based Heusler Alloys Mn2VZ (Z = Al, Ga, In, Si, Ge, Sn). Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 18, 2905.  
https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/10/013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xing, N., Li, H., Dong, J., Long, R. and Zhang, C. (2008) First-Principle Prediction of Half-Metallic Ferrimagnetism of the Heusler Alloys Mn2CoZ (Z = Al, Ga, Si, Ge) with a High-Ordered Structure. Computational Materials Science, 42, 600-605.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.09.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ishida, S., Akazawa, S., Kubo, Y. and Ishida, J. (1982) Band Theory of Co2MnSn, Co2TiSn and Co2TiAl. Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics, 12, 1111.  
https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/12/6/012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barth, J., Fecher, G.H., Balke, B., Ouardi, S., Graf, T., Felser, C., Yoshikawa, H., et al. (2010) Itinerant Half-Metallic Ferromagnets Co2Ti Z (Z = Si, Ge, Sn): Ab Initio Calculations and Measurement of the Electronic Structure and Transport Properties. Physical Review B, 81, Article ID: 064404.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.064404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sprungmann, D., Westerholt, K., Zabel, H., Weides, M. and Kohlstedt, H. (2010) Evidence for Triplet Superconductivity in Josephson Junctions with Barriers of the Ferromagnetic Heusler Alloy Cu2MnAl. Physical Review B, 82, Article ID: 060505.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.060505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baek, K.H., Kim, J.H., Woo, H.J., Lee, G.J., Lee, Y.P. and Yoon, C.S. (2009) Magnetic Grating Produced by Localized Crystallization of Amorphous Cu2MnSn Thin Film Using Femtosecond Laser Pulses. Journal of Applied Physics, 105, Article ID: 083927. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3103582</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ko, V., Han, G., Qiu, J. and Feng, Y.P. (2009) The Band Structure-Matched and Highly Spin-Polarized Co2CrZ/Cu2CrAl Heusler Alloys Interface. Applied Physics Letters, 95, Article ID: 202502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3263952</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Simon, E., Vida, J.G., Khmelevskyi, S. and Szunyogh, L. (2015) Magnetism of Ordered and Disordered Ni2MnAl Full Heusler Compounds. Physical Review B, 92, Article ID: 054438. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054438</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galanakis, I. and Sassoilu, E. (2011) Structural-Induced Antiferromagnetism in Mn-Based Full Heusler Alloys: The Case of Ni2MnAl. Applied Physics Letters, 98, Article ID: 102514. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3565246</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kierstead, H.A., Dunlap, B.D., Malik, S.K., Umarji, A.M. and Shenoy, A.G. (1985) Coexistence of Ordered Magnetism and Superconductivity in Pd2YbSn. Physical Review B, 32, 135. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aoki, Y., Sato, H.R., Matsuda, T.D., Sugawara, H. and Sato, H. (1998) Coexistence of and Competition between, Superconductivity and Magnetism in YbPd2Sn. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 177, 559-560.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00385-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aoki, Y., Sato, H.R., Sugawara, H. and Sato, H. (2000) Anomalous Magnetic Properties of Heusler Superconductor YbPd2Sn. Physica C: Superconductivity, 333, 187- 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4534(00)00100-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wernick, J.H., Hull, G.W., Geballe, T.H., Bernardini, J.E. and Waszczak, J.V. (1983) Superconductivity in Ternary Heusler Intermetallic Compounds. Materials Letters, 2, 90-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-577X(83)90043-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W. (1964) Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Physical Review, 136, B864. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Segall, M.D., Lindan, P.J., Probert, M.A., Pickard, C.J., Hasnip, P.J., Clark, S.J. and Payne, M.C. (2002) First-Principles Simulation: Ideas, Illustrations and the CASTEP Code. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14, 2717.  
https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perdew, J.P., Burke, K. and Ernzerhof, M. (1996) Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Physical Review Letters, 77, 3865.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vanderbilt, D. (1990) Soft Self-Consistent Pseudopotentials in a Generalized Eigenvalue Formalism. Physical Review B, 41, 7892.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monkhorst, H.J. and Pack, J.D. (1976) Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations. Physical review B, 13, 5188. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broyden, C.G. (1970) The Convergence of a Class of Double-Rank Minimization Algorithms 2. The New Algorithm. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 6, 222- 231. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamat/6.3.222</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fletcher, R.A. (1970) A New Approach to Variable Metric Algorithms. Computer Journal, 13, 317.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goldfarb, D. (1970) A Family of Variable-Metric Methods Derived by Variational Means. Mathematics of Computation, 24, 23-26.  
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0258249-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shanno, D.F. (1970) Conditioning of Quasi-Newton Methods for Function Minimization. Mathematics of Computation, 24, 647-656.  
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0274029-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giudicelli, P., Roessli, B., Stunault, A., Ollivier, J., Amato, A., Sugawara, H. and Bernhoeft, N. (2004) Low Energy Magnetic Excitations in Superconducting YbSnPd2. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 272, E141-E142.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.11.086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adroja, D.T. and Malik, S.K. (1992) Magnetic-Susceptibility and Electrical-Resis- tivity Measurements on RPdSn (R = Ce-Yb) Compounds. Physical Review B, 45, 779. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.45.779</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malik, S.K., Umarji, A.M. and Shenoy, G.K. (1985) Depression of the Superconducting Transition Temperature of the Heusler Alloy Pd2YSn with the Addition of Magnetic Rare-Earth Metals. Physical Review B, 32, 4426.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.4426</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mullmann, R. and Mosel, B.D. (1998) Dimorphic YbPdSn with ZrNiAl and TiNiSi Type Structure. Z. Kristallogr, 213, 356-363.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Simkin, M.V. and Mahan, G.D. (2000) Minimum Thermal Conductivity of Superlattices. Physical Review Letters, 84, 927.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.927</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, Z., Zhou, X. and Zhang, K. (2016) Phase Stability, Electronic Structure and Mechanical Properties of IrBx (X = 0.9, 1.1): First-Principles Calculations. Computational Materials Science, 113, 98-103.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.11.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, Y., Guo, Z.X., Yang, R. and Li, D. (2001) First Principles Study of Site Substitution of Ternary Elements in NiAl. Acta Materialia, 49, 1647-1654.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00052-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Z.J., Zhao, E.J., Xiang, H.P., Hao, X.F., Liu, X.J. and Meng, J. (2007) Crystal Structures and Elastic Properties of Superhard Ir N2 and Ir N3 from First Principles. Physical Review B, 76, Article ID: 054115.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.059904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, X., Jiang, Y., Zhou, R. and Feng, J. (2014) Stability and Elastic Properties of Y-C Binary Compounds Investigated by First Principles Calculations. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 587, 819-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ozisik, H., Deligoz, E., Colakoglu, K. and Surucu, G. (2013) Structural and Mechanical Stability of Rare-Earth Diborides. Chinese Physics B, 22, Article ID: 046202. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/22/4/046202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewandowski, J.J., Wang, W.H. and Greer, A.L. (2005) Intrinsic Plasticity or Brittleness of Metallic Glasses. Philosophical Magazine Letters, 85, 77-87.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500830500080474</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hill, R. (1952) The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, 65, 349. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fine, M.E., Brown, L.D. and Marcus, H.L. (1984) Elastic Constants versus Melting Temperature in Metals. Scripta Metallurgica, 18, 951-956.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(84)90267-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pugh, S.F. (1954) XCII. Relations between the Elastic Moduli and the Plastic Properties of Polycrystalline Pure Metals. The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 45, 823-843.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yan, H., Zhang, M., Wei, Q. and Guo, P. (2013) Ab Initio Studies of Ternary Semiconductor BeB2C2. Computational Materials Science, 68, 174-180.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nye, J.F. (1985) Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., Franke, P., Seifert, H.J. and Wang, J. (2015) Polymorphism of M3AlX Phases (M = Ti, Zr, Hf; X = C, N) and Thermomechanical Properties of Ti3AlN Polymorphs. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 98, 2570-2578.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X., Luo, X., Li, J., Hu, P. and Han, J. (2010) The Ideal Strength of Transition Metal Diborides TMB2(TM = Ti, Zr, Hf): Plastic Anisotropy and the Role of Prismatic Slip. Scripta Materialia, 62, 625-628.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ravindran, P., Fast, L., Korzhavyi, P.A., Johansson, B., Wills, J. and Eriksson, O. (1998) Density Functional Theory for Calculation of Elastic Properties of Orthorhombic Crystals: Application to TiSi2. Journal of Applied Physics, 84, 4891-4904.  
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368733</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clarke, D.R. (2003) Materials Selection Guidelines for Low Thermal Conductivity Thermal Barrier Coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology, 163, 67-74.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00593-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cahill, D.G., Watson, S.K. and Pohl, R.O. (1992) Lower Limit to the Thermal Conductivity of Disordered Crystals. Physical Review B, 46, 6131.  
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.46.6131</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, C.X., Duan, Y.H. and Hu, W.C. (2015) Electronic Structure, Elastic Anisotropy, Thermal Conductivity and Optical Properties of Calcium Apatite Ca5(PO4)3X (X = F, Cl or Br). Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 619, 66-77.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75080-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vassen, R., Cao, X., Tietz, F., Basu, D. and St&amp;ouml;ver, D. (2000) Zirconates as New Materials for Thermal Barrier Coatings. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 83, 2023-2028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01506.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>