<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2017.73019</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-74838</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Analysis of Scientific and Commercial Softwares Accuracy in GPS Observation Processing
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morteza</surname><given-names>Hamidi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peyman</surname><given-names>Javadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Master of Geodesy and Lecturer, Islamic Azad University, Rafsanjan Branch, Rafsanjan, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Master of Geodesy, Lecturer and Head of Department of Geomatics Engineering at Sama College, Ardabil Branch, Ardabil, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>peymanjavadi@samaard.ac.ir(PJ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>03</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>267</fpage><lpage>278</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>7,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>19,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The engineers use various softwares for observation processing and GPS networks, generally everyone who uses a device, he uses softwares with the same brand for the processing of it GPS processing networks by defined default parameters and models. The most outstanding issue is that, it should be understood, the application of which kinds of softwares will help us to gain the desirable accuracy and whether the accuracy of coordinate estimation is acceptable in all commercial softwares or not. In this article, we compared a series of softwares which engineers use for their data processing with powerful scientific software that meanwhile it is too hard and time consuming to learn it. We have considered accuracy and validity of scientific software, which gives acceptable results, as a baseline to see how much errors and difference is between this software and the commercial softwares, so we selected Bernese as a scientific software and LGO, Ashtech Solutions, CGO softwares as commercial softwares and we analyzed them and compared the applied models of the softwares with each other. To do so, we choose a GPS network from Tehran city and discussed it, in order to evaluate the measured accuracy for baselines and also coordinate system that after data processing, it was understood that if the polygon of a network is small, commercial softwares can be utilized with very high acceptable accuracies and even by Ephemerides Precise data, their accuracy will increase more, but if our network is more extended and bigger, there is no other choice except using scientific softwares to calculate coordinate that performs a processing by many parameters.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Commercial Software</kwd><kwd> Scientific Software</kwd><kwd> GPS</kwd><kwd> Bernese</kwd><kwd> LGO</kwd><kwd> CGO</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In the middle of 1990s, GPS inventors introduced Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) method, that by means of it, we can achieve the desirable accuracies in surveying. In this method, the user usually is in need of a reference station which is located at maximum 10 km distance, in order to determine the position with centimeter accuracy. The applications of this method account for: positioning with high accuracy for navigation systems, guiding auto-run machines, unmanned aerial vehicles, marine missions like: dredging and large-scale map’s update [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref1">1</xref>] . In general, RTK is a process in which GPS signal corrections are communicated from a reference station’s receiver with known position to one or more rover receivers in a real-time strategy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref2">2</xref>] . It means that, by short time observations, the determination of dynamic position is possibly prepared and by carrier code signals, the position of rover station is determined with centimeter accuracy immediately [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>By increasingly development of GNSS satellite navigation and emergence of new companies for production of related receivers, numerous softwares have been developed for processing of these data that in the most general form, these softwares can be divided into scientific and commercial groups. Scientific softwares that mainly are prepared by universities or reliable scientific centers are programmed for utilization in precise and professional tasks. In addition, commercial softwares which are produced by those companies that produce GNSS receivers are applied for data processing of general users and engineers. Commercial softwares not only don’t have the complexity of professional and scientific softwares, they have a plain graphical and user friendly environment that it has simplified and quicken dealing with these softwares. While scientific softwares are much more complex and have specific and professional settings that make it too hard to handle them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref4">4</xref>] . Nowadays, we are all witness for emergence of many commercial softwares that, it is very crucial to choose the best and the most precise software out of these softwares. Considering the ideas of geomatics engineers, these commercial softwares: CGO, LGO and Ashtech Solutions, are the most used softwares in Iran that we compare this commercial software with a scientific software named Bernese to receive the best answers from comparisons. In this study, we don’t aim to describe special software, but the goal is to compare softwares with default methods and an algorithm of softwares. The reason for using the softwares defaults is that, geomantic engineers presented that they don’t change any default except the zone of region while working with the softwares. Our theory is that the results and accuracy of scientific softwares is more precise than the results mined from commercial softwares. So our main goal is to compare calculated baselines and estimated coordinate of a process from a network of GPS stations of GNSS servers by scientific and commercial software with each other and conduction of a comparison among commercial softwares, regarding their accuracy in baselines, coordinate and Standard Deviation. Of course, it should be mentioned that, the present softwares or definable models for each software will be totally different from each other.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Models of Bernese Scientific Softwares</title><p>In this part, we will introduce various models of this scientific software and we will explain each of them briefly.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Offset Model for Antenna Phase Center of Satellite and Receiver</title><p>Offset model of satellite antenna phase and variation of electrical phase of receiver antenna and offset center of receiver’s antenna have many effects on PPP processing. So models with ANTEX format have been applied to delete these effects. In Bernese software, “.rel” format is used to omit these effects and in fact, rel. is the ANTEX format of Bernese software. To achieve this format, in addition of using the products of CODE, PHCCNV software can be applied that in Bernese software is prepared for conversion of ANTEX format to “.rel” format [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref5">5</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Error of Satellite Clock and Error of Satellite Position</title><p>Like other scientific softwares, Bernese software also, uses IGS products to decrease the orbital errors of satellite and the errors of satellite clock, so Bernese software owns this ability to decrease the errors of satellite clocks and errors of satellite clock by using “.clk” and “.sp3” formats. Furthermore, to decrease the orbital errors of satellites, it can use “.sp3” and “.pre” and “.eph” formats too.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Model of Relocation from Ocean Upload</title><p>In order to omit the effect of relocation caused by ocean upload, Bernese software uses “.blq” standard suffix of these models. One of the most famous centers that gives these models is Onsala observatory. The users can refer to the website of this observatory and fill the related form to receive these models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref6">6</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Earth Rotation Parameters</title><p>Earth rotation parameters are those parameters that are presented in “.eop” standard format. These parameters both are presented by IGS processing center weekly and also they are shown in two (A) and (B) Bultons by IERS. Bulton (A) includes fast earth rotation parameters that are presented daily and Bulton (B) are earth rotation parameters which are published monthly.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Satellite State Space Model</title><p>Satellite state space model are models which are released annually by AIUB. These models reveal satellites’ safety at different episodes and Bernese software uses these models for proving the satellites’ safety at observing time and if satellites’ safety is not proved, that satellites’ observation would be deleted from observation list [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Satellite Ephemeris Model</title><p>Satellite Ephemeris models are binary files with “.eph” format. These models are presented by solar dynamics observatory, Jet Propulsion Laboratory and NASA. Up to now, three series of these models are presented in these numbers: DE100, DE200 and DE400. Bernese software uses these models to calculate the position of moon, sun and other planets.</p><p>Since, the binary format of these models are not free, Bernese software uses a tool to convert numeral format of these models into binary format of Bernese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Earth Gravity Model</title><p>Bernese software applies very well-known gravity models like: GEMT3, GEM- 10N, JGM3, EGM96, TEG4, EIGEN1 and EIGEN2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Ocean Tide Model</title><p>The ocean tide models have “.tid” Suffix that most of them are prepared by space research center of Texas University. Bernese software exploits these models for calculation of variations in gravity caused by oceanic tides.</p><p>Note: in scientific softwares, we don’t have model for ionosphere and troposphere and the software itself calculates them scientifically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74838-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Applied Models in Commercial Softwares</title><p>As mentioned before, in scientific softwares, we don’t have any ionospheric and tropospheric errors and the software calculates them scientifically but in commercial softwares, we decrease or omit them by models. In commercial software, we tune the ionosphere error model in automatic state that if the length of network is large, L3 frequency will be used that in this condition, the ionosphere error would be deleted thoroughly but the problem of this work is that the noise is very much. But if the length of network is short, L1 + L2 frequency is used that reduces the errors.</p>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>3.1. Applied Models by LGO Commercial Software for Processing</title>
<p>Parameters and cases that should be set and investigated before processing by LGO software are mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec></sec></body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.74838-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Instructions for Using the Software (2013) Bernese, Leica Geo Office, Ashtech Solutions. CHC Geomatics Office.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Satirapod, C. and Rizos, C. (2002) Stochastic Assessment of GPS Carrier Phase Measurements for Precise Static Relative Positioning. Journal of Geodesy, 76, 95-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, H., Slaughtera, D.C., Pérez Ruizb, M., Glievera, C., Upadhyayaa, S.K. and Smith, R.F. (2010) RTK GPS Mapping of Transplanted Row Crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 71, 32-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amirkhani, M. (2012) Determination of the Effect of Troposphere Zenith for Two-Frequencies-GPS on Ship. MSc Thesis, University of Tehran, Iran.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choy, S., Zhang, K. and Silcock, D. (2008) An Evaluation of Various Ionospheric Error Mitigation Methods Used in Single Frequency PPP. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 7, 62-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuan, Y., Huo, X. and Ou, J. (2007) Models and Methods for Precise Determination of Ionospheric Delay Using GPS. Progress in Natural Science, 2, 187-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, K. and Gao, Y. (2005) Real-Time Precise Point Positioning Using Single Frequency Data. Proceedings of the IONGNSS 18th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, Long Beach, 13-16 September 2005, 1514-1523.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bland, J.M. and Altman, D.G. (1986) Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Journal of Lancet, 327, 307-310.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abd-Elazeem, M., Farah, A. and Farrag, A.F. (2011) Assessment Study of Using Online (CSRS) GPS-PPP Service for Mapping Applications in Egypt. Journal of Geodetic Science, 1, 233-239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montazeri, A. and Tahriri, A. (1386) The Analysis and Processing of GPS Data by PINNACLE Software. Zaban Tasvir, Tehran.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daho</surname><given-names> S.A.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Precision Assessment of the Orthometric Heights Determination in Northern Part of Algeria by Combining the GPS Data and the Local Geoid Model</article-title><source> Comptes Rendus Geoscience</source><volume> 342</volume>,<fpage> 87</fpage>-<lpage>94</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74838-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Péreza, J.L., Mozasa, A.T., Lópeza, A., Aguilarb, B.F.J., Delgadoa, J., Fernándezb, I. and Aguilarb, M.A. (2012) Efficient Methods to Convert LiDAR-Derived Ellipsoid Heights to Orthometric Heights. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 573-578.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>