Background: Antiretrovirals (ARVs) are the molecules used in the fight against infection by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Their main objective is to stop the virus from replicating and thus allow the immune system to recover. In 2001, the program to fight against HIV/AIDS United Nations (UNAIDS) and its partners has decided to strengthen the pharmaceutical channel and improve access to good quality care. Thus ARV quality control is recommended. Objective: The objective of this work was to monitor the quality of ARVs distributed in Kinshasa. Methodology: In this work, UV-visible spectrophotometry is used for the analysis of ARVs presented in simple form distributed in the city of Kinshasa. Results: The results of this work show that the stated and analyzed ARVs contain active ingredients; there is no placebo. Ten percent of these ARVs are non-compliant with regard to dosing of the active test. Conclusion: These results confirm the need to control these drugs to protect patients from adverse consequences related to their poor quality.
Spectrophotometry UV-Visible ARV Kinshasa1. Introduction
Antiretrovirals (ARVs) are molecules used to fight against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection [1] . The main objective of these molecules is to slow down the virus replication and thus allow the immune system to recover, to make the plasmatic Viral Load (VL) undetectable (<50 RNA/ml copies) which allows better immune restoration and reduces the risk of selection of resistant virus [1] .
In 2001, the United Nations program to fight against HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and its partners has addressed the problems of drug quality in their generic form [2] . This program is more interested in ARV in resource limited countries where generics are often of dubious quality and quantitatively under dosage recommendation [2] [3] . UNAIDS has decided to strengthen the pharmaceutical channel of these countries and improve access to quality care for all patients because poverty and disorganization of the pharmaceutical sector are the main reasons for the phenomenon of counterfeiting [4] . The qualitative and quantitative analysis of ARV is therefore recommended. This must be done regularly, internally and externally, and be reported to the appropriate authorities [1] . It should be performed throughout the pharmaceutical supply circuit; from manufacture to use. At reception and storage point, each batch of ARVs must be subject to quality control [1] .
The National Programs against HIV/AIDS (PNMLS and PNLS) are the main national bodies in the fight against the epidemic and the care of People Living with HIV (PLHIV) in the country. Their main strategies are focused on education and outreach; free voluntary testing in different centers, management, therapeutic monitoring and psychosocial assistance for eligible patients [5] .
In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the most commonly used molecules, as of 2012, are: Abacavir (ABC), Efavirenz (EFV), Lamivudine (3TC), Lopinavir boosted by Ritonavir (LPV/r), Nevirapine (NVP), Stavudine (d4T) and Zidovudine (ZDV) [5] . All these molecules are pre-qualified generic by the World Health Organization (WHO); however, pre-qualification does not exclude quality control in the provision for use by the patient [2] .
This study aimed to control the quality of some ARVs distributed in Kinshasa [6] . The targeted molecules in this study were: Abacavir (ABC), Efavirenz (EFV), Nevirapine (NVP) and Zidovudine (ZDV).
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Framework
This study was conducted in the period from the August 20, 2013 to January, 20 2014. Quality control analyses were performed at Laboratory of Molecular Biology of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Kinshasa (UNIKIN), LAPHAKI and AVEPHARMA Laboratories, all in Kinshasa.
2.2. Analyzed Molecules
The molecules analyzed in this study are presented in Table 1. They were freely donated by different monitoring centers for HIV patients in Kinshasa [5] .
2.3. Selection of Samples
The sample selection was made randomly in the received packages. Twenty pills of each drug were used for the analysis.
2.4. Materials
The UV-Visible spectrophotometer (HP/Agilent 8453) with Agilent Technologies ChemStation software (Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) was used for the study. The wavelengths used were 285 nm for Abacavir (ABC) [7] and Nevirapine (NVP) [7] [8] , 266 nm for Zidovudine (ZDV) [7] [9] and 254 nm for Efavirenz (EFV) [7] . Friabilimeter was of Erweka brand and tablet disintegration was achieved with a device of the Labfine model Dit-200 brand from Research Lab Fine Chem (Mumbai, India).
List of Antiretrovirals used in this study
NOM DU MEDICAMENT (SPECIALITE)
D C I
Manufacturer
Batch Number
Origin of Manufacturer
Abacavir sulfate Pills of 300 mg
Abacavir
Matrix labo Limited
1082374
India
Abacavir sulfate Pills of 300 mg
Abacavir
Aurobindo
AB3011030A
India
Abacavir sulfate Pills of 300 mg
Abacavir
Aurobindo pharma limited
NDC 65862-073-60
India
Aviroz® Pills of 300 mg
Zidovudine
Ranbaxy
2359701
India
EstivaN® Pills of 600 mg
Efavirenz
Hétéro labs Iimited
E120314A
India
Nevipan® Pills of 200 mg
Nevirapine
Ranbaxy
2386326
India
Nevimune® Pills of 200 mg
Nevirapine
Cipla
X10889
India
Nevirapine Pills of 200 mg
Nevirapine
Strides arcolab Limited
7216002
India
Nevirapine Pills of 200 mg
Nevirapine
Strides
NE2012089-A
India
Nevirapine Pills of 200 mg
Nevirapine
Aurobindo
NE2012089-A
India
2.5. Reagents
The substances of references used were obtained from Sigma Aldrich of Belgium (Efavirenz-98.1% and Zidovudine-98.0%), USP Millipore (Nevirapine-99.7%) and Cayman Chemical Lansing of the United States of America (Abacavir-100%). Methanol and methylene chloride used for these analyzes were provided by Merck of Germany. The ultrapure water was produced using the Aqua Max-Basic™ 360 series device of YL Instruments of South Korea.
2.6. Pharmaco-Technical Tests
Performed according to the recommendations of the European Pharmacopoeia 8.1 [10] , the friability test was performed by weighing a given number of pills equivalent to 6.5g. This assay allows estimating the strength of the tablets during the packaging operations, and possible coating and transport. The pills disintegration was completed in ultrapure water placed at 37˚C for 15 minutes to determine the ability to disintegrate in a prescribed time in liquid medium.
2.7. Methods
The friability assays, the chemo-physical assays and the spectrophotometric assays used in this study are all described in the literature [6] - [14] . The standards assay being set from 90.0% to 110.0%.
2.8. Preparation of Standard Solutions
Standard solutions of 1 mg/ml were prepared from the reference chemicals of different molecules each dissolved in 100 ml of solvent (methanol for EFV, NVP and ZDV; ultrapure water for ABC). Different concentrations (5 μg/ml, 10 µg/ml and 15 μg/ml) were used to draw the calibration line in the type of y = ax + b (a: as the slope of the equation; b: as origin coordinate; x: as the concentration; y: as the analytical response or absorbance). The coefficient of determination (R2) was used as a quality indicator for the calibration slope. After the linearity of the calibration slope was confirmed, it was used to calculate the sample concentrations.
3. Results and Discussion
The samples used in this study were provided without charge by different centers of treatment and supported for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Kinshasa. Table 1 provides information on the various molecules used; he presents the name of the drug, the International Nonproprietary Name (INN), the manufacturer's name, the batch number and the manufacturer's country of origin. All these molecules are manufactured by Indian pharmaceutical companies (Matrix Lab Limited, Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Ranbaxy, Hetero Labs Limited, Cipla and Strides Arcolab Limited).
Table 2 shows the results of tests friability obtained for the 10 analyzed specialties. All molecules were analyzed in accordance with a loss of weight less than 1% by. These tablets can therefore hold up well during packaging and transportation.
Table 3 presents the results of the disintegration test of the 10 molecules tested. This Physicochemical test provides information on the potential release of active ingredient from the oral dosage form in a required time and good disintegration of such tablets in the gastrointestinal tract because the disintegration promotes bioavailability of drug [6] [10] . These molecules were compliant in relation to disaggregation time; they all have a time inferior than 15 minutes.
Further then, the molecules were identified through their Ultra Violet (UV) spectra through the methods used. These UV spectra are shown in Figure 1 for all 4 analyzed molecules. In all samples tested, there was concordance between the standard UV spectrum and that found in the sample, allowing confirming the identity of the different molecules analyzed. They all contain the active principle as declared by the manufacturer.
After determination of UV spectra, the molecules were quantified using the calibration lines. The results of the quantification of the molecules are shown in
Results of the friability assays with the studied drugs
Specialties
Obtained %
Nevipan®
0.4
Nevimune®
0.5
Nevirapine
0.6
Nevirapine
0.7
Nevirapine
0.4
Abacavir sulfate
0.6
Abacavir sulfate
0.8
Abacavir sulfate
0.9
Estiva - 600®
0.5
Aviroz®
0.5
Results of disintegration assays with the studied drugs
Specialties
Observed time in minute
Abacavir sulfate
4
Abacavir sulfate
10
Abacavir sulfate
10
Aviroz®
13
Estivan®
12
Nevipan ®
10
Nevimune®
11
Nevirapine
12
Nevirapine
10
Nevirapine
12
Table 4. In all cases, R2 is close to 1. These different molecules show good adjustment to the calibration line obtained meaning that there is a correlation between the introduced concentration and the analytical response represented by the absorbance. The calibration lines are validated, they were then used to de-
termine concentrations such as x = Y − b a and content of active substances in
Dosage results of studied drugs
Specialties
Equation of the lines
R²
% ± standard deviation
Decision
Abacavir sulfate
Y= 0.038X + 0.153
0.998
105% ± 0.12%
Conformed
Abacavir sulfate
Y= 0.038X + 0.196
0.998
105% ± 0.67%
Conformed
Abacavir sulfate
Y= 0.039X + 0.001
0.999
101% ± 0.78%
Conformed
Aviroz ®
Y= 0.028X + 0.0241
0.994
107% ± 0.45%
Conformed
Estiva 600®
Y= 0.039X + 0.0001
0.999
101% ± 0.56%
Conformed
Nevipan®
Y= 0.034X + 0.010
0.998
99% ± 0.89%
Conformed
Nevimune®
Y= 0.28X + 0.20
0.998
94% ± 0.78%
Conformed
Nevirapine
Y= 0.014X + 0.219
0.986
115% ± 0.90%
Non Conformed
Nevirapine
Y= 0.032X + 0.001
0.995
103.6% ± 0.56%
Conformed
Nevirapine
Y= 0.028X + 0.020
0.990
97.5% ± 0.87%
Conformed
the samples [14] . A molecule analyzed out of ten (Nevirapine of Strides Arcolab Limited) is non-compliant in relation to the dosage of the active ingredient. This molecule is overdosed (115%) which is a poisoning threat to patients.
These results are similar to those described in our environment [6] , ARVs distributed in Kinshasa are of good quality, but there is still 1 set that captures the attention. Hence the need to widely implement quality control of ARVs.
4. Conclusion and Perspective
The objective of this study was to monitor the quality of antiretroviral medicines presented in non-combined form distributed in Kinshasa using UV-Visible spectrophotometry. The molecules used for this study are: Abacavir, Efavirenz, Nevirapine and Zidovudine.
The results obtained from the 10 analyzed molecules show that all these products contain the active ingredients stated and satisfy to friability testing and disintegration of tablets. However, a molecule (10%) is non-compliant in accordance with dosing tests, which poses a risk of toxicity for the patient. This demonstrates the need for quality control of ARVs prior to distribution in Kinshasa.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support for CCD to JK Mbinze. The LAPHAKI and AVEPHARMA laboratories are also thanked for their frank cooperation.
Cite this paper
Kamangu, E.N., Mbinze, J.K., Mingu, A.M., Bolavie, J.B., Mvumbi, G.L., Kalala, R.L., Mesia, G.K., Lusakibanza, M., Mavar, J. and Marini, R.D. (2017) UV Visible Spectrophotometric Determination of the Quality of Antiretro- viral Drugs Distributed in Kinshasa. Open Access Library Journal, 4: e2923. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102923
NOTESReferences[1] Yeni, P., et al. (2010) Prise en Charge Médicale des Personnes Infectées par le VIH, Rapport. Recommandation du groupe d’experts du Ministère de la Santé et des Solidarités, République Franaise.[2] Gross O. ,et al. (2006)Programme OMS de pré-qualification des Antirétroviraux, Antipaludiques et Antituberculeux Médecine Tropicale 66, 549-551.[3] Habyalimana, V., Kalenda, N., Dispas, A., Mbinze, J.K., Kadima, J.L., Lebrun, P., Hubert, P. and Marini, R.D. (2014) Generic Screening Chromatographic Methods to Fight against Poor Quality Medicines. Spectra Analysis, 298, 30-36.[4] Mbinze, J.K., Nsangu, J.M., Maghe, E., Kobo, S., Mwanda, R., Mulumba, G., Bolavie, J.B., Bayebila, T.M., Borive, M.A., Hubert, Ph. and Marini, R.D. (2015) Application of Total Error Strategy in Validation of Affordable and Accessible UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Methods for Quality Control of Poor Medicines. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 6, 106-107. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2015.62010[5] Kamangu, N.E., Kalala, N.H. and Mesia, K.G. (2012) Profile of Antiretroviral Treat-ment Centers in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the African Society of Laboratory Medicine, December, Poster 388.[6] Kamangu, N.E., Kalala, N.H. and Mesia, K.G. (2014) Analyse des Antirétroviraux distribués à Kinshasa: étude préliminaire. Revue Congolaise des Sciences, 1, 152-159.[7] Sarkar, M., Khandavilli, S. and Panchagnula, R. (2006) Development and Validation of RP-HPLC and Ultra Violet Spectrophotometric Methods of Analysis for the Quan-titative Estimation of Antiretroviral Drugs in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 830, 349-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.11.014[8] Anbazhagan, S., Indumathy, N., Shanmugapandian, P. and Sridhar, S.K. (2005) Sim-ultaneous Quantification of Stavudine, Lamivudine and Nevirapine by UV Spectros-copy, Reverse Phase HPLC and HPTLC in Tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 39, 801-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2005.04.044[9] Sharada, C.H., Channabasavaraj, K.P. and Tamizh Mani, T. (2010) Development of a Spectrophotometric Method for the Quantitative Estimation of Zidovudine Concen-tration in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. KMITL Science and Technology Journal, 10, 1-8.[10] EuropeanPharmacopoeia 8.0. www.online6.edqm.eu/ep800/[11] Traore, A.S. (2005) Mise au point des méthodes d’identification et de dosage des médicaments antirétroviraux au Mali. Thèse doctorale. Faculté de Médecine, de Pharmacie et d’Odonto-Stomatologie.[12] British Pharmacopoeia. https://www.pharmacopoeia.com[13] Buri, P. (1983) Mesure de la vitesse de dissolution pour l’amélioration et le contr?le de la qualité des médicaments. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 1, 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0731-7085(83)80054-5 [14] The International Pharmacopoeia 6th Edition. www.apps.who.int/phint/fr/p/about/