<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2017.92015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-74107</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Spatial Variability and Contamination Levels of Fresh Water Resources by Saline Intrusion in the Coastal Low Lying Areas of the Douala Metropolis-Cameroon
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mary</surname><given-names>Lum Fonteh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Theophile</surname><given-names>Fonkou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mathias</surname><given-names>Fru Fonteh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Estella</surname><given-names>Buleng Tamungang Njoyim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cornelius</surname><given-names>Mbifung Lambi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Geography, Higher Teacher Training College, The University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Higher Teacher Training College, The University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Geography, Faculty of Social and Management Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mariefontehniba3@gmail.com(MLF)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>215</fpage><lpage>237</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>11,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>14,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  A study based on the spatial variability and contamination levels of fresh water resources by saline intrusion was conducted in the Douala coastal area. The study was aimed at highlighting the associations between major ions in ground water from which cause-effect relationships could be inferred. Water samples were collected from 19 stations. 3 stations were selected from the mangrove area and 16 stations were selected from the rest of the area partitioned into four transects (coastal transect, inner transect 1, inner transect 2 and inner transect 3). Sampling was done repeatedly during the dry season and these samples were analysed for physico-chemical parameters. Results show that the samples were acidic (pH: 4.7 - 6.7). Total dissolved solids (TDS) and electrical conductivity (EC) values ranged between 70.3 - 3703 mg/L and 136.4 - 7333 μS/cm respectively indicating medium salt enrichment and brackish waters. High temperatures (T
  &#176;C) and low dissolved oxygen (DO) values of 26
  &#176;C - 30.3
  &#176;C and 0.96 - 3.9 mg/L respectively were observed and this could be interpreted as the acceleration of biological and chemical processes of ground water resources. Major ions were within the WHO limits except for Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> (20.3 - 85 mg/L) and Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> (6.6 - 49.6 mg/L) respectively whose concentrations were slightly higher. The leading cations were Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> &gt; Na
  <sup>+</sup> &gt; Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> &gt; K
  <sup>+</sup> while 
  <img src="Edit_cf005f88-fb55-4639-a857-a6bb63fa6f45.bmp" alt="" /> were the leading anions. The multivariate analysis approach (MAA) values obtained for water variables showed that F1, F2 and F3 accounted for 61.6%, 21.5% and 9.9% respectively of total variance with strong loadings and these were considered to account for the ground and surface water quality of the area. The main water types were 63.2% 
  <img src="Edit_23cf0937-65ca-45e2-b1f6-6202dfa15371.bmp" alt="" />, 26.3% Ca
  <sup>2+</sup>-Cl
  <sup>-</sup> and 10.5% Na
  <sup>+</sup>-Cl
  <sup>-</sup>. 89.5% of the water types had secondary salinity implying that anthropogenic sources were the source of salinity. The water was not fit for drinking. The values calculated for percentage sodium and sodium absorption ratio to determine its suitability for agricultural purposes revealed that 63.15%, 15.5%, 5.3% and 15.8% of sampled water were excellent, good, doubtful and unsuitable respectively for irrigation purposes. The need for water resource monitoring and forecasting regarding deterioration in quality is imperative before hazards of the rise in sea level arise.
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Spatial Variability</kwd><kwd> Fresh Water Resources</kwd><kwd> Salinity Intrusion</kwd><kwd> Douala IV-Cameroon</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Douala metropolis is the economic hub of the Cameroonian nation with more than 70% of its industries that have given it a considerable importance in the economy and development of the country. In such an area, utilities including water are quite important for human and industrial growth.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref1">1</xref>] stipulates that water is a basic necessity, underlying the reason why the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) advocated for access to clean water for all by the year 2015. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref2">2</xref>] indicated that about 50% of the Cameroonian population does not have access to safe drinking water. The situation of the Douala coastal area is particularly worrying because water can be found “everywhere although safe portable water is scarce”. This area has abundant natural water resources, but the water quality parameters in the area are a dodgy issue. Fur- thermore, water supplies by the National Water Company fall short of the demand for domestic and industrial use in terms of quantity and quality. Big industries (breweries, textile, chemical, soap factories, agrochemical plants and others) in the area have therefore turned to boreholes for water to meet their needs.</p><p>The protection of surface and ground water resources from seawater encroachment is a real issue of concern for coastal communities and this area is similarly affected. The quality of ground water resources in the area could be further complicated by the impact associated with an increasing population, urban development and industrial expansion. In addition, the predictions of increasing rise in the sea level in the area as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref4">4</xref>] and associated hazards in the region may exacerbate the problem in the long term. The salinisation of the water resources could also be due to the formation of large piezometric draw-down cones resulting from the increasing extraction of ground water and this could accelerate salt water intrusion (SWI) by reversing the hydraulic gradients into the aquifers as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref5">5</xref>] . Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref8">8</xref>] indicated that SWI into coastal aquifers, rivers and estuaries is one of the impacts that coastal residents will face because of global warming as a result of thermal expansion of oceans and the consequent rise in sea levels. For instance, in North Africa and Iran, communities have been observed to drink water containing as much as 3000 mg/L of chlorides and 1500 mg/L of sulphates as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref9">9</xref>] . Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref10">10</xref>] indicated that, salt water (water containing dissolved salts) is not suitable for drinking because it dehydrates the human body systems and should be desalinated before consumption. As indicated, these ions can act as laxative to those who are not used to drinking such water. Even for industrial and agricultural use, salt water also requires desalinisation and this could imply extra costs.</p><p>Understanding the quality patterns of ground water resources is a complex issue because inputs can come from a variety of sources: SWI, ascending deep ground water, precipitation, rapid urbanization and improper waste disposal and high agrochemicals use. It is common knowledge that the spatial variation in chemical composition of ground water comes from different types of input and this is extremely difficult to understand but has important practical applications for water resource management and evaluation as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref11">11</xref>] . Therefore, in order to ensure a rational exploitation of these water bodies, there is a need to understand the interaction of the factors underpinning their quality.</p><p>A regular monitoring of the quality of ground water cannot therefore be over- emphasized. The on-going study is designed to determine the extent and severity of SWI into water resources of the coastal low lying area of Douala.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Douala IV is located within the Douala sedimentary basin with coordinates at latitudes 04˚03' - 04˚07' North of the equator and longitudes 09˚37' - 09˚41' East of the Greenwich meridian with an average elevation of not more than 10 m above sea level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The climate is the wet equatorial type and the rainy season extends from April to November, followed by a short dry season typically occurring between December and March. Its annual total rainfall is generally high with values of up to 4000 mm in August and lower values in the month of February. It has, on the average, 180 rainy days a year. Temperatures are high averaging between 24˚C and 27˚C. The hydro graphical network within the zone of study is very dense and shows a dendritic pattern. The Wouri River constitutes one of the drainage systems of the Douala metropolis and flows all year round through the Akwa, Bonaberi and part of the Bassa zones. This river is fed by many intermittent streams that are normally loaded with most of the solid and liquid wastes channeled from industries, households and waste dumps.</p><p>The area is a sedimentary basin of Cretaceous to Tertiary age having a total surface area of 7000 km<sup>2</sup> and has a maximum width of 60 km. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref12">12</xref>] noted that the Douala basin consists of the Cretaceous Mungo River Formation, stratigraphically overlain by the Tertiary Mpundu Formation. The Douala</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location of sampling points</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x4.png"/></fig><p>metropolis lies directly on the Mio-Pliocene to Recent alluvial sediments which constitute the Wouri Formation of the Douala basin. It is made up of unconsolidated fine to coarse-grained sand and gravel mixed with silt and clay in various proportions. The alluviums are composed predominantly of quartz and kaolinite with a general thickness that ranges between 50 and 60 m.</p><p>Zonal and azonal soils can be distinguished. The sandy ferralitic zonal soils are light coloured, freely drained with top sandy soils and sandy clay sub-soils. These soils are formed in sandy sediments that are rich in quartz with fairly high humus contents. They have a good friability and low water retention capacity; essentially, they result from the decomposition of sedimentary rocks as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref13">13</xref>] . Young azonal (alluvial) soils are found here and have not been sufficiently subjected to the effects of soil forming processes as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref14">14</xref>] . These are immature soils that are good for agriculture.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Design</title><p>Four coastal zone routes in the Douala IV district of Bonassama were selected to check SWI into open wells between November 2014 to May 2015. The locations and altitudes of selected sample sites were determined on the field using a Garmin GPS 60 CX. This enabled the location of the coordinates to produce sample location maps (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The routes and 16 of the sampling stations with their location are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Collection and Analysis of Water Samples</title><p>Water was drawn from the open wells using drawing buckets tied with ropes.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sampling stations and routes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coastal Transect (CT)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inner Station 1 (IT1)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inner Station 2 (IT2)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inner Station 3 (IT3)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Route 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Close to EU well</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Entre Marin Haute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bocom (Mabanda)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bonamikano</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Route 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EU well</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ngwele Entrance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marche Grand Hangar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mbanjo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Route 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marin Haute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bojongo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Entree Ndobo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ndobo Slaughter House</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Route 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >End of Ngwele</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mid way Bojongo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Entr&#233;e Siac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bepele</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Each water sample was collected into a collector after thorough rinsing with the water to be sampled. Water from the collector was filled into 500 mL capacity plastic bottles and preserved to avoid evaporation. The samples were stored in ice-chest containers at about 4˚C prior to laboratory analysis to exclude microbial activity and unwanted chemical activity. Temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), pH salinity and TDS were measured directly on the field using a DO probe and an EC/pH/temperature metre.</p><p>Chemical parameters were determined as per standard APHA methods as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref15">15</xref>] . The chemical analyses were performed in the Laboratory for Waste Water Research of the Faculty of Science in the University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon. The total hardness of calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) and magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>) were determined by using the EDTA complexometric titration method; chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>) by the argentometric method; nitrate, sulphate and phosphate measurements were done using ion chromatography on a Dionex ICS-900. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref16">16</xref>] , indicates that the charge balance calculated should be within the acceptable limit of &#177;5%. Sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>) and potassium (K<sup>+</sup>) were analysed by the flame photometric method; salinity was measured using HACH salinity metre. Bicarbonate (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) was measured through titration by adding 0.02-M HCl solution to the sample while stirring until the endpoint marked by a pH of 4.5, was obtained.</p><p>To get a clear grasp of the spatial chemical composition of water resources in the Douala IV area, water samples were plotted on a Piper diagram using AQUACHEM software as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref17">17</xref>] . The Wilcox formula was used to determine the % Na as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref18">18</xref>] . The physico-chemical properties of ground water resources in Douala IV were further evaluated graphically by plotting EC and sodium absorption ration (SAR) on the United States Salinity (USSL) diagram as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physical Characteristics of Water Samples</title><p>A univariate analysis of the physico-chemical data of ground and surface water in Douala IV is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Water sources characteristics in the study area are not uniform implying that the chemical composition varies over a wide range in physical composition. The average ground water temperature ranged from 27.7˚C to 30.1˚C which is slightly higher than the present day, mean atmospheric temperature of 27.62˚C. Ground water usually maintains a fairly constant temperature which, for superficial aquifers, is normally close to the</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical summary of physico-chemical data of dry season water resources in the study area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Costal transect (n = 4)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Inner transect 1 (n = 4)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Inner transect 2 (n = 4)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Inner transect 3 (n = 4)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Surface water (n = 4)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std D</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Temp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.725</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7540</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1661.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2235.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >336.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >221.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >629</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >662</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1660</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4977.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.825</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.481</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >837.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1112.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >965</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >351</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >810</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3703.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2510.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.495</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.459</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.81</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>mean annual air temperature. In this case, the mean of 27.6˚C was slightly higher than the mean atmospheric temperature of 26.6˚C. This could accelerate the rate of chemical reactions in such systems.</p><p>The dissolved oxygen ranged from 0.95 to 2.68 mg/L for ground water and 3.97 mg/L for surface water indicating a low degree of solubility. All water samples showed DO of below 5 mg/L. The measurement of DO is critical to the scientific understanding of the potential for chemical and biochemical processes in groundwater. Concentrations below 5 mg/L may adversely affect the functioning and survival of biological communities and below 2 mg/L may lead to the death of most fish. The measurement of DO can be used to indicate the degree of pollution by organic matter, the destruction of organic substances and the level of self-purification of the water.</p><p>The probable low solubility values could be as a result of higher water temperatures and organic matter pollution. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref20">20</xref>] highlighted this fact indicating that low DO could have severe adverse effects on the geochemistry and ecology of different systems.</p><p>The entire aquifer system is acidic because all samples (100%) showed pH values less than 7. The pH of ground water ranged from 4.7 to 6.2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) indicating that the waters are highly acidic to slightly neutral. Similarly, pH value of 6.7 for surface waters indicate that they were slightly acidic. The presence of azonal and zonal soils and organic litter from mangroves in the area may have contributed to the acidic nature of the well waters. This could probably result from the decomposition of soil organic matter as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref21">21</xref>] . Additionally, poor sewage disposal methods in this area compounded by the intrusion of brackish water into the area could account for the pH of the water. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref22">22</xref>] , shows that these processes involve ground water reactions with lateritic soils and humic acids from the decomposition of organic matter in the infiltration zones leading to acidification from dissolved carbon dioxide. Related findings as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref23">23</xref>] attest to this. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref24">24</xref>] indicated that acidity in ground water could also result from the reduction in the acid buffering capacity due to soil acidification.</p><p>The mean TDS of ground water samples ranged from 70.33 - 837.75 mg/L while that for SW stood at 3703.33 mg/L (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Most of the ground waters except for two points of the coastal transect, are fresh while the surface water are not fresh following the definitions as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref25">25</xref>] who indicated that TDS values &lt; 1000 mg/L represent fresh water. The EC readings ranged from 136.4 - 1661.5 and 1660 - 10500 for well water and surface water respectively. EC values were distinctly higher at stations close to the coast. The salinity data for this period ranged from 0.008 to 0.825 for IT3 and CT respectively while that for surface water ranged from 0.8 - 6 mg/L.</p><p>Generally, the findings have shown that salinity decreased with an increase in distance from the coastal transects to inner transects as expected. The highest salinity values were for the coastal transects at SW1 and SW2.</p><p>The huge variation in TDS of surface water and ground waters of 70.33 - 837.7 mg/L and 3703.33 mg/L respectively can be ascribed to the fact that these waters were close to the sea where mangroves could be found, probably indicating an intrusion of salt water. High TDS in water may produce bad taste, odour and colour and may also induce unfavourable physiological reactions in the consumer as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref26">26</xref>] . This could probably account for the bad odour and taste of ground water resources as confirmed by some residents of the study area.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Chemical Characteristics of Water Samples</title><p>The leading cation was Ca<sup>2+</sup> which had an average percentage concentration of 62.4%, 50.6%, 44.6% and 33.3% as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> at IT2, IT1, CT, SW and IT3 respectively. This was followed by Na<sup>+</sup> (55.6%, 33.19%, 32.2%, 21.6% and 16%) in IT3, IT1, CT, IT2 and SW respectively. Mg<sup>2+</sup> was the third and K<sup>+</sup> the last in percentage concentration with values of 48.6% and 2.1% in SW and IT1 respectively in that order (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The major anions were sulphate, chloride, nitrate, bicarbonate and phosphate representing 64.29% (IT2), 63.19% (CT), 34.03% (IT3), 8.41% (IT3) and 1.69% (IT1) respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The low K<sup>+</sup> content was probably due to its low content in rocks of the study area.</p><p>Nitrate concentrations indicate that 6.3% of sample (one sample) exceeded 10 mg/L (WHO limit for nitrates in drinking water). The probable sources of nitrates could have been domestic detergents (application of fertilizers and domestic waste waters).</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage cations in the different transects</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage anions in the different transects</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x11.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Hydrochemistry of Water Samples</title><p>The Spearman correlation analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) indicates the association between key ions in water resources within the area of study. The results highlight a strong regression statistical analysis with R<sup>2</sup> values of 1 for EC-Salinity, EC-TDS, EC- Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Salinity-TDS, Salinity-Mg<sup>2+</sup>, TDS-Mg<sup>2+</sup>. Strong positive correlations of T˚C- DO, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, EC-Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, salinity-Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, TDS-CL<sup>−</sup> of 0.9 suggesting that the different aquifer chemistry is controlled by these parameters as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref27">27</xref>] . A strong positive correlation of 0.9 exists between, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup>. Another minor correlations of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>of 0.7, 0.6 and 0.7 respectively which further control the aquifer chemistry of the study area was observed.</p><p>The correlations between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of 0.7 and 0.9 respectively could suggest poor sanitation conditions in terms of proximity of toilets to wells and the use of detergents.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Spearman’s correlation matrix for water samples in Douala IV</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Water Temp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TDS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Temp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The multivariate analysis approach (MAA) has been used in the last years for the assessment of water quality. This is because water quality assessment often requires that several variables be studied concurrently. The use of MAA to link physical and chemical data will enable an overview of the potential cause-effect associated with concentrations of major ions and physical parameters of multi-variable sets as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref28">28</xref>] . MAA values identify the sources and or controlling factors of SWI into the Douala IV coastal ground water as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref29">29</xref>] . It is a multivariate statistical technique to explore variable distributions. The Factor analysis was performed on the correlation matrix that is the variables were auto-scaled (standardized) so as to be treated with equal importance. All analyses were performed using the PCA option of the factor procedure, followed by the basic set-up for factor analysis procedure from the XLSTAT 2015 statistical software.</p><p>The present study chose to interpret a variable or group of variables as those associated with a particular factor where loadings were 0.4 or greater, corresponding to an associated explained variance over 65%. This approximates Comrey’s (1973) cut-off of 0.55 for a good association between an original variable and a factor and takes into account discontinuities in the magnitudes of loadings approximating these original variables as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>The results of varimax with the Kaiser normalisation rotated factor loading for water resource chemistry data in Douala IV are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> (biplot) respectively which highlight the controlling factors determining the water chemistry of the study area. These resulting factors are vital because they</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Associations from which cause-effect relationships controlling ground water resources are inferred in the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x30.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Factor loading, eigenvalues and variances for water resource chemistry data in Douala IV</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F4</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.925</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.081</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.845</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.287</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.984</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.832</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.448</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.226</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.283</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.924</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.381</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.542</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.684</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.484</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup> (mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.646</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.325</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.726</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.471</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.283</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eigenvalue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.033</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Variability (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.582</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.540</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.886</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.582</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>pinpoint on the controlling processes that lead to the different water facies obtained in this area. Four factor loadings with a 100% variance explained in the dataset are accounted for from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The loading of variables on each factor and the corresponding percentage of data variance are explained by each factor.</p><p>The first principal factor is predorminant and accounts for 61.6% of the total variance with high positive loadings of pH, EC, salinity, TDS, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> and high negative loadings of K<sup>+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This factor can be termed salinity-dissolved solute factor. The first factor determines the main processes that control ground water chemistry. The association of variables (EC, pH, salinity, TDS, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup>) in factor 1 (61.6%) of total variance indicates that these variables will impact significantly on the resulting water facies that would be obtained. This is in agreement with the observations as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref24">24</xref>] who indicated that the major ions, pH and TDS are sensitive to variations in EC. The fact that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> ions are under factor one, shows their predominance in the determination of the water types.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref31">31</xref>] , noted that a high negative loading of variables in a factor shows that they go contrary to the process that generated the negative high loadings. Positive loading indicates the interrelationship of variables that determine the water types of the study area by linking their different concentrations.</p><p>The second factor explains 21.5% variance indicating that the solubility of DO decreases with an increase in temperature; the reason why they could be found under the same factor. MAAs have been carried out as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref32">32</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref38">38</xref>] . Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref39">39</xref>] highlighted two factors that were responsible for controlling hydro-chemi- cal processes of ground water in Togo. Their factors were related to the ions with dominant concentrations and therefore the main contributors to groundwater salinity in this study.</p><p>Factor 3 was observed to account for 9.9% of the variance while factor 4 accounted for 6.9% of the total variance and it is associated with high pH and Na<sup>+</sup> loading and K<sup>+</sup>, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> loadings respectively for factors 3 and 4. Their preferences in regulating ground water chemistry could therefore be minimal.</p><p>The factor analysis does not produce cause effect relationship but highlights the associations from which such cause-effect relationships can be inferred as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref31">31</xref>] . Factor analysis is not used in isolation but it is used with several graphical techniques to make a meaning from hydro-chemical analysis and to identify the water types in the area under investigation. This is why some equations of bivariate plots of EC and chloride and major ions and chloride were exploited together with the Piper diagram to better understand the underlying controlling processes of ground water resources in the study area as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Equations and R<sup>2</sup> Value from Linear Trend Lines for the Determination of Saline Intrusion</title><p>The association between key ion chemistry is not enough to deduce the cause- effect relationship of hydro-chemical facies. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref42">42</xref>] noted that an early indication of SWI into ground water may be a high EC because sea water has a higher EC value than fresh water.</p><p>Additionally, an increase in Cl<sup>−</sup> concentration may be the first indication of SWI into an area devoid of other possible sources of saline contamination. Consequently, equations and R<sup>2</sup> value of EC and chloride and major ions and chloride were derived from their corresponding plots to attest to this.</p><p>Chloride/EC:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula139"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula140"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Sodium/chloride:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula141"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula142"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Calcium/chloride:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula143"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula144"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Magnesium/chloride:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula145"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula146"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Sulphate/chloride:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula147"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula148"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (1) reveals a good correlation of electrical conductivity and the chloride concentration in Douala IV (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.7782). This indicates that a mixing between sea water and fresh water are taking place. From Equation (1), the mechanisms of mixing between sea water and fresh water are complex because otherwise, there would have been a perfectly linear correlation between electrical conductivity and the chloride concentration as has similarly been observed as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><p>From Equation (2), the relationship between sodium and chloride shows a depletion of sodium and a nearly linear relation of calcium and chloride as seen in Equation (3). However, magnesium and sulphate enrichment with chloride, at some points, suggest a strong water aquifer interaction related to direct cation exchange (Equations (4) and (5)). This sample must be from the CT and SW transects as they show a large deviation from the theoretical line of mixing as a result of their high sulphate and magnesium content.</p><p>The Piper diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) indicates the different water types. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref44">44</xref>] , indicates that the Piper diagram is preferable because it give a better identification of the water samples and the dorminant geo-chemical processes in the water chemistry.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, indicates that the water types are of Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> types. Five samples (IT3, 2 IT2 and 2 IT1) representing 26.32% of the total samples are of the Ca<sup>2+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> type. Two samples (10.53%) of the total samples are of the Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> type and are found in the IT3 transects and 12 samples (one in IT3, two in IT2, two in IT1, four in CT and three in SW) representing 63.2% of the total number of samples are of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> facies water type.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Piper diagram showing the water types and its proportions of Douala IV</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x52.png"/></fig><p>The study shows that the abundance of cations was Ca<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Na<sup>+</sup> &gt; Mg<sup>2+</sup> &gt; K<sup>+</sup> indicating that Ca<sup>2+</sup> is the most abundant followed by Na<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>. The relative abundance of anions is in the order of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This indicates that the leading anion is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> followed by Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The likely source of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> could be from the dissolution of gypsum and halite as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref45">45</xref>] which could be present in the catchment area. This could be so because a positive correlation matrix of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.7) exists. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref46">46</xref>] , shows gypsum to be extensively distributed in the subsurface layer of aquifers and generally its dissolution produces calcium and sulphate as seen in Equation (6).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74107-formula149"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The correlation between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9) suggests a probably poor sanitation conditions in the area.</p><p>The majority of samples are depleted in Na<sup>+</sup> and enriched in Mg<sup>2+</sup> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (Equations (2), (4) and (5) respectively). This shows that Na<sup>+</sup> usually contained in sea water has been replaced by Ca<sup>2+</sup> on the one hand, but this could also result from the dissolution of gypsum on the other hand.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Water Resource Suitability with Respect to Saline Water Contamination in Douala IV</title><p>The temperature values were high. This may increase taste, odour, colour and corrosion problems as already apparent in the water sources from field survey. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> values were much higher than the WHO norms (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The presence of these alkaline earth metals signifies water hardness. Though hardness has no adverse effect on human health, there is an aesthetic concern because of the unpleasant taste that it imparts. It can prevent the formation of</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Ground water quality in douala IV compared with WHO (2004) safe drinking water standards</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Range in study area</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >WHO limits</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water temperature (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 - 30.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7 - 6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 - 8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC (μS/cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136 - 7388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008 - 4.167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.955 - 3.970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TDS (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 3703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.987 - 16.458</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.143 - 1.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650 - 2.696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.50 - 158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043 - 1.559</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 - 122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>lather with soap, a problem which the inhabitants of CT are already facing. This may also increase the boiling point of water and cause encrustation in the water supply distribution system.</p><p>Fresh water resources in Douala IV are vulnerable to acid contamination as the waters from the area are acidic with a range of 4.7 - 6.7 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Additionally, the levels of EC are high as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref47">47</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref52">52</xref>] which is an early indication of SWI. EC is a good measure of salinity hazard on crops because an excess of salinity reduces the osmotic potential of plants and thus interferes with the absorption of water and nutrients from the soil as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref39">39</xref>] . An evaluation of ground water fitness for agricultural uses, based on standards put in place by international organisations as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref54">54</xref>] is imperative.</p><p>The analytical plot of the Wilcox formula (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) shows that sodium is commonly measured for water used for drinking or agricultural purposes. Elevated sodium contents in certain soil types can degrade soil structure thereby restricting water movement and affecting plant growth.</p><p>The analysis showed that 12 water samples (representing 63.2%) were excellent for irrigation; 3 samples (CTc, IT2b, SWa), representing 15.8% of total number of samples, were good; sample CTb (5.3%) was doubtful while 3 samples (CTa, SWb, SWc), representing 15.8%, were unsuitable for irrigation purposes in term of % Na (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>The sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) was further used to evaluate and confirm the suitability of water for irrigation. The ratio estimates the degree to which sodium will be adsorbed by the soil. High values of SAR, which are related to the</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> The suitability of water resources in Douala IV for irrigation purposes based on % Na</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x67.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Sampled points and corresponding quality of water based on % Na</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Na</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Quality of water</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Excellent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (CTd, IT1a, IT1b, IT1c, IT1d, IT2a, IT2c, IT2d, IT3a, IT3b, IT3c and IT3d)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20% - 40%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (CTc, IT2b, SWa)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40% - 60%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Permissible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60% - 80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doubtful</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (CTb)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unsuitable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (CTa, SWb, SWc)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>EC, imply that sodium in the irrigation water may replace calcium and magnesium ions in the soil, potentially causing damage to the soil structure as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref39">39</xref>] . Such studies have been carried out elsewhere with promising implications for policy measures as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref59">59</xref>] .</p><p>The analytical data for ground water chemistry that was plotted on the US salinity diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) illustrates that 8 samples, representing 42%, are found in the low salinity and low alkalinity (C1S1) area and is good for irrigation purposes.</p><p>Four samples (21.1%) found in the C2S1 type which represents medium salinity and low alkalinity in water qualities showed that the irrigation quality of water was fair in this transects of Douala IV. Type C3S1 had four samples (21.1%) indicating a high salinity and low alkalinity in water, which can be used for irrigation on almost all types of soils with little danger of exchangeable sodium as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref55">55</xref>] . Three samples however, which represented 15.8% of total number of samples were found in type C4S1 indicating a very high salinity and low alkalinity and were thus not suitable for agricultural activities as shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>.</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> A classification of irrigation waters using the US Salinity diagram</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x68.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Quality of irrigation water based on electrical conductivity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity hazard class</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Specific conductance (&#181;S/cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (CTd, IT1d, IT2c, IT2d, IT3a, IT3b, IT3c and IT3d)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250 - 750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (IT1a, IT1b, IT1c and IT2a)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 - 2250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (CTb, CTc, IT2b and SWa)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very high</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (CTa, SWb, SWc)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The spatial variation (CT, IT1, IT2, IT3 and SW) and contamination of ground and surface water resources in the low lying area of the Douala IV metropolis were assesed using both physical and chemical parameters (EC, pH, salinity, TDS, concentrations of Na<sup>+</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>). Two points of ground water of IT3 were located close to the Wouri River and the other two were far inland from the coast. These waters are rich in Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup> and exhibit all the water types (Ca<sup>2+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup>). Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> water types indicates that the water type undergoes primary salinity while Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> water types suggest a possible mixing with sea water.</p><p>Two points each from the IT2 and IT1 are of the<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> water types and the other two points are of the Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup> water type. All sample points from CT and SW are of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> water types. These suggest that secondary salinity is taking place at these points indicating pollution from domestic and leaking sewage and that the processes controlling ground water chemistry in the area are varied.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>The interpretation of hydro-chemical analysis in the present study showed that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, and Cl<sup>−</sup> met the guideline limits while T˚C, pH, EC, DO, TDS, Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> were above WHO limits.</p><p>MAA values obtained for water variables showed that F1, F2 and F3 accounted for 61.6%, 21.5% and 9.9% respectively of total variance with strong loadings and these were considered to determine the ground and surface water qualities of the area. F4 was not considered due to a much lower variance (6.8%). The study indicated calcium followed by sodium to be the most abundant cations. Sulphate was the most abundant anions. Furthermore, most samples were depleted in sodium and enriched in magnesium and sulphate from Equations (2), (4) and (5) respectively.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref50">50</xref>] indicated that depletion in Na<sup>+</sup> and a gain in Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup> highlight a direct cation exchange observed in situations where sea water is replacing fresh water. When SWI occurs, there is the favoured release of Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup> from exposed bedrock due to weathering of clay minerals. Consequently, free Cl<sup>−</sup> anions are released and there is the adsorption of Na<sup>+</sup> onto mineral surfaces. The fact that Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> ions are released and Na<sup>+</sup> are engrossed points to salinization of water resources in the study area. Ca<sup>2+</sup> is however one of the major cations and this suggests the existence of other sources contributing to the enrichment of groundwater. This could be substantiated by the dissolution of gypsum and associated minerals in the aquifer.</p><p>Piper diagrams illustrated that water types are of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (63.2%), Na<sup>+</sup>- Cl<sup>−</sup> (10.53%) and Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl (26.32%) type. This shows that all water types are made up of strong acid ions (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Cl<sup>−</sup>) which exceed weak acids (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). Alkaline earths (Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>) exceed alkalis (Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>) in all samples (89.5%) except for two from IT3. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> illustrates that these samples are of non-carbonate hardness, indicating that secondary salinity exceeds 50% and the main properties are dominated by alkaline earths and strong acid ions. This explains why the water types are of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup> type and implies that the water types are from formations that could be composed of dolomite and limestone or from active recharge zones with short residence times as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref36">36</xref>] . Two samples from IT3 are of alkaline carbonate (primary salinity exceeds 50%) and its chemical properties are dominated by alkalis and weak acids, hence this water type is of the Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> type. These water types could be originating from halite dissolution (saline) or alkaline carbonate enrichment.</p><p>Primary salinity implies that the acquisition of salts is a result of natural dissolution of the underlying rocks in the study area and this is seen in two samples from IT3 representing 10.53% of total water types. The other two points which are far from the coastal transects must have started witnessing secondary salinity. The SW, CT, IT1 and IT2 are all experiencing secondary salinity, implying that either salt water from the ocean is gradually intruding into fresh water aquifers or the high rate of urbanisation is influencing secondary salinity. This could pose a fundamental problem to ground water resources in the future if nothing is done.</p><p>The rest, 89.5% of water types is a result of anthropogenic activities, termed secondary salinization. 26.3% of this water type is of the Ca<sup>2</sup> <sup>+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup> type. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref21">21</xref>] indicated that the occurrence of Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup> water type in coastal aquifers signifies an active process of sea water mixing where Na<sup>+</sup> from sea water is exchanged for Ca<sup>2+</sup> adsorbed on clays. Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup> water types have developed in this area and the Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> water type occur close to the River Wouri. However, Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref51">51</xref>] indicated that Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl<sup>−</sup> water types do not develop in the study area. Contrarily, this study underlines the fact that the area was experiencing salinisation. These differences could be attributed to the spatial differences in the studies. Additionally, Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref36">36</xref>] indicate that typical sea water mixing or base ion exchange is observed in study areas when some water samples belonged to the Na-Cl and Na-HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> water types. Two samples representing 10.53% of total samples analysed are of the Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> water type, implying that sea water mixing or base ion exchange occurs in the study area.</p><p>Other probable sources of secondary salinity in this area could be urbanization and industralisation activities. However, inhabitants of Douala IV do not carry out agricultural activities intensively and consequently; the most probable sources of secondary salinity could be urbanization and sea water intrusion into coastal aquifers.</p><p>Several authors have noted saline water intrusion into coastal aquifers as a major concern with hazards of probable rise in sea level aggravating the situation as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref62">62</xref>] . This constitutes the most common of all the pollutants of freshwater. Therefore, an understanding of saline intrusion is essential for the management of coastal water resources as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref56">56</xref>] .</p><p>Varied studies on water quality for different end uses have been carried out in Cameroon. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref34">34</xref>] , in their study centered on the suitability of ground water for drinking, domestic and agricultural uses in the banana plantation plains of Njombe, concluded that nitrate contamination is taking place. Re- ference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref51">51</xref>] concluded that ground water in a highly urbanised coastal area is vulnerable to acid deposition. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref63">63</xref>] , in their study, indicated that the continuous use of River Wouri and Dibamba for domestic puposes is unsafe and needs attention. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref22">22</xref>] in their different studies for the Gulf of Guinea and of Ndop plain respectively indicated that more than 50% of the water sources studied were suitable only for drinking and irrigation purposes. Their studies did not focus on water quality fitness with regards to hazards of a rise in sea level. Such studies as in Douala IV which is the economic capital of the nation, are thus vital in Cameroon. This study has higlighted a very comtempory issue that needs to be addressed before it gets out of hand. Raising awareness as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref64">64</xref>] to the inhabitants of this area to the effects of of SLR hazards is important. Additionally the use of spatial data sets as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74107-ref65">65</xref>] as an initial requirement in depicting most vulnerable areas should be envisaged.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The interpretation of hydro-chemical analysis in the present study showed that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, and Cl<sup>−</sup> met the guideline limits while T˚C, pH, EC, DO, TDS, Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> were above WHO limits. MAA values obtained for water variables showed that F1, F2 and F3 accounted for 61.6%, 21.5% and 9.9% respectively of total the variance with strong loadings and these were considered to determine the ground and surface water qualities of the area. F4 was not considered due to a much lower variance (6.9%). The piper diagrams illustrated that water types are of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-9403038x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (63.2%), Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> (10.5%) and Ca<sup>2+</sup>-2Cl (26.3%) type. All samples except two from IT3 (89.5%) were dominated by more than 50% of alkaline earth ions (Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>) and strong acid anions. These samples exhibited non-carbonate hardness indicating that the secondary salinity of ground water dominates over primary salinity. 10.5% (Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup>) of total number of samples indicated seawater with a Na<sup>+</sup> dorminant type or Cl<sup>−</sup> dorminant type waters indicating typical salinity through seawater mixing .</p><p>The main processes that determine the water types of the study area were: 1) reversed ion exchange which is a situation that occurs when alkaline earths metal ions (Ca<sup>2+</sup> + Mg<sup>2+</sup>) are in excess of alkali ions (Na<sup>+</sup> + K<sup>+</sup>) and strong acid ions exceed weak acid ions and; 2) basic ion exchange processes which entails residual sodium carbonate disposition in the area, a situation in which Na<sup>+</sup>-Cl<sup>−</sup> water types were identified in the study.</p><p>10.5% of water facies of IT3 were of primary salinity while 89.5% of water types were of secondary salinity. This could be attributable to gradual salt water intrusion from the sea into the aquifers as observed in the order of SW &gt; CT &gt; IT1 &gt; IT2 &gt; IT3. However, it could also have resulted from urbanization, although it was not clear which urban activities could have provoked the salinization of ground water resources. The fact that two sample points of IT3 experienced secondary salinity did not mean that they constitute a major health hazard in the future.</p><p>According to the Wilcox formula and the USSL diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), 15.8% of the ground water samples were not suitable for irrigation purposes. The demand for water has increased resulting in an associated acute shortage of water to meet the daily water consumption needs of the people. Most of the residents of Douala depend on borehole wells for domestic, industrial and agricultural use. Present and future palatability of ground water resources for domestic purposes in Douala IV will go a long way to ensure public health and serve for important practical application of water resource management in the area.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Fonteh, M.L., Fonkou, T., Fonteh, M.F., Njoyim, E.B.T. and Lambi, C.M. (2017) Spatial Variability and Contamination Levels of Fresh Water Resources by Saline Intrusion in the Coastal Low Lying Areas of the Douala Metropolis- Cameroon. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 215-237. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.92015</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.74107-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AWDR (African Water Development Report) (2006) Freshwater Resources in Africa. 380 p. http://www.fanrpan.org/documents/d00367/African_Water_Development_Report_2006.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gleick, P.H. (1998) The World’s Water: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Island Press, Washington DC, 7-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonteh, M., Esteves, L.S. and Gehrels, W.R. (2009) Mapping and Valuations of Ecosystems and Economic Activities along the Coasts of Cameroon: Implications of Future Sea Level Rise. Coastline Reports, 13, 47-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndenecho, E.N. and Fonteh, M.L. (2012) Freshwater and Coastal Resource Management in Cameroon: Building Resistance and Resilience to Climate Change. Agwecams Printers, Bamenda, 328 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zghibi, A., Tarhouni, J. and Zouhri, L. (2013) Assessment of Seawater Intrusion and Nitrate Contamination on the Groundwater Quality in the Korba Coastal Plain of Cap-Bon (North-East of Tunisia). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 87, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2013.07.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, G. (1992) Impacts of Future Sea Level Rise on Salt Water Intrusion in the Changjiang River Estuary. Chinese Geographical Science, 2, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2010.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Emmanuel, B.E. and Chukwu, L.O. (2010) Spatial Distribution of Saline Water and Possible Sources of Intrusion into a Tropical Freshwater Lagoon and the Transitional Effects on the Lacustrine Ichthyofaunal Diversity. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4, 480-491.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murgulet, D. and Tick, G.R. (2008) Assessing the Extent of Saltwater Intrusion in the Aquifer System of Southern Baldwin County. Alabama Naples 4 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cairncross, S. and Feachem, R.G. (1983) Environmental Health Engineering in the Tropics: An Introductory Text. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, 283 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Conner, S.L. and Freeman, L.A. (1998) Drinking Water Quality. Waterworks Publishing, Florida, 31 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Desai, B. and Desai, H. (2012) Assessment of Water Quality Index for Ground Water with Respect to Salt Water Intrusion at Coastal Region of Surat City, Gujarat, India. Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 7, 607-621.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntamak-Nida, M.J., Bourquin, S., Makong, J., Baudin, F., Mpesse, J.E., Ngouem, C.I., et al. (2010) Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy from Outcrops of the Kribi-Campo Sub-Basin: Lower Mundeck Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Southern Cameroon). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 58, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2010.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gavaud, M. and Muller, J.P. (1980) Soils Atlas of the United Republic of Cameroon. Jeune Afrique, Paris, 51 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neba, A.S. (1999) Modern Geography of the Republic of Cameroon. 2nd Edition, Neba Publishers, Camden, 200 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA/AWWA/WEP (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st Edition, APHA, AWWA, and WEF, 1368 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Domenico, P.A. and Schwartz, F.W. (1990) Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, Vol. 411, 485-497.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piper, A.M. (1944) A Graphic Procedure in the Geochemical Interpretation of Water Analyses. American Geophysical Union Transactions, 25, 914-923. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilcox, L.V. (1955) Classification and Use of Irrigation Waters. US Department of Agriculture Circular 969, Washington DC, 367 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Richard, L.A. (1954) Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkalis Soils. Agric. Handbook 60, US Dept. Agric., Washington DC, 160 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Best, M.A., Wither, A.W. and Coates, S. (2007) Dissolved Oxygen as a Physico-Chemical Supporting Element in the Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Appelo, C.A.J. and Postma, D. (1996) Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 536 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wotany, E.R., Ayonghe, S.N., Fantong, W.Y., Wirmvem, M.J. and Ohba, T. (2013) Hydrogeochemical and Anthropogenic Influence on the Quality of Water Sources in the Rio del Rey Basin, South Western, Cameroon, Gulf of Guinea. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7, 1053-1069.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ako, A.A. (2011) Hydrological Study on Ground Water in the Banana Plain and Mount Cameroon Area-Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL). PhD Dissertation. Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 222 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chapman, D. (1996) Water Quality Assessments: A Guide to the Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring. UNESCO/WHO/UNEP, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd., Milton Park, 609 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/NOE0419216001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A. (1979) Groundwater. 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliff, 604 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spellman, F.R. and Drinan, J. (2000) The Drinking Water Handbook. Technomic Publishing Company Inc., Lancaster, 260 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odoh, B.I., Utom, A.U., Egboka, B.C.E. and Okeke, H.C. (2012) Geoelectric Sounding for Predicting Shallow Aquifer Properties Using Modified Archie Equations. Paper Presented at the SEG-AGU Hydrogeophysics Workshop, Boise State University, Boise.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gauch Jr., H.G. (1982) Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 298 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623332</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riba, I., Zitko, V., Forja, J.M. and DelValls, T.A. (2003) Deriving Sediment Quality Guidelines in the Guadalquivir Estuary Associated with the Aznalcolar Mining Spill. A Comparison of Different Approaches. Ciencias Marinas, 29, 261-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Comrey, A.L. (1973) A First Course in Factor Analysis. Academic Press, New York, 342 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yidana, S.M., Banoeng-Yakubo, B. and Sakyi, P.A. (2012) Identifying Key Processes in the Hydrochemistry of a Basin through the Combined Use of Factor and Regression Models. Journal of Earth System Science, 121, 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-012-0163-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seyf-Laye, A.M., Mingzhu, L., Fei, L., Djaneye-Bouindjou, G., Moctar, L.B. and Honghan, C. (2011) Factor Analysis as an Example of Qualitative and Quantitative Method for Modeling Hydrogeochemical Processes of Coastal Sedimentary Basin of Togo. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 5, 5554-5559.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gnazou, M.D.T., Bawa, L.M., Banton, O. and Djanéyé-Boundjou, G. (2011) Hydrogeochemical Characterization of the Coastal Paleocene Aquifer of Togo (West Africa). International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, 3, 10-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ako, A.A., Shimada, J., Hosono, T., Ichiyanagi, K., Nkeng, G.E., Fantong, W.Y., et al. (2011) Evaluation of Groundwater Quality and Its Suitability for Dinking, Domestic, and Agricultural Uses in the Banana Plain (Mbanga, Njombe, Penja) of the Cameroon Volcanic Line. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 33, 559-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-010-9371-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yidana, S.M. (2010) Groundwater Classification Using Multivariate Statistical Methods: Southern Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 57, 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.12.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ravikumar, P. and Somashekar, R.K. (2015) Principal Component Analysis and Hydrochemical Facies Characterization to Evaluate Groundwater Quality in Varahi River Basin, Karnataka State, India. Applied Water Science, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0287-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, S. and Nag, S.K. (2015) Application of Multivariate Statistical Analysis Concepts for Assessment of Hydrogeochemistry of Groundwater—A Study in Suri I and II Blocks of Birbhum District, West Bengal, India. Applied Water Science, 1-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, T.A. (2015) Groundwater Quality Evaluation Using Multivariate Methods, in Parts of Ganga Sot Sub-Basin, Ganga Basin, India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7, 769-780. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2015.79063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleh, A., Al-Ruwaih, F. and Shehata, M. (1999) Hydrogeochemical Processes Operating within the Main Aquifers of Kuwait. Journal of Arid Environments, 42, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1999.0511</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghabayen, M.S., Mckee, M. and Kemblowki, M. (2006) Ionic and Isotopic Ratios for Identification of Salinity Sources and Missing Data in Gaza Aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 318, 360-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, J.Y. and Song, S.H. (2006) Evaluation of Ground Water Quality in Coastal Areas: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture. Environmental Geology, 50, 17-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pulido-Leboeuf, P. (2004) Seawater Intrusion and Associated Processes in a Small Complex Aquifer (Castell de Ferro, Spain). Applied Geochemistry, 19, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Milnes, E., Meilhac, C., Yeo, D., Renard, P., Hunkeler, D., Schnegg, P., et al. (2006) Hydrogeochemical and Hydrogeological Investigationin the Akrotiri Aquifer: Identification of Multiple Salnisation Processes and Implementation Criteria for Monitoring Networks. SWIM-SWICA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cusimano, G., Hauser, S. and Vassallo, M. (2006) Hydrogeochemistry of a Wetland Area of South Western Sicily (Italy). E-Water. Official Publication of the European Water Association (EWA).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shangengana, E.S., Seely, M.K. and Sanderson, R.D. (2004) Major Ion Chemistry and Groundwater Salinization in Ephermeral Flood Plains in Some Arid Regions of Namibia. Journal of Arid Environments, 57, 71-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suthar, S., Bishnoi, P., Singh, S., Mutiyar, P.K., Nema, A.K. and Patil, N.S. (2009) Nitrate Contamination in Groundwater of Some Rural Areas of Rajasthan, India. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 171, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zghibi, A., Zouhri, L., Tarhouni, J. and Kouzana, L. (2012) Groundwater Mineralisation Processes in Mediterranean Semiarid Systems (Cap-Bon, North East of Tunisia): Hydrogeological and Geochemical Approaches. Hydrological Processes, 27, 3227-3239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slama, F., Bouhlila, R. and Renard, P. (2010) Identification of Groundwater Salinization Sources Using Experimental, Multivariate Statistical Analysis and Numerical Modelling Tools: Case of Korba Coastal Aquifer (Tunisia). 38th International Association of Hydrogeologists Congress on Groundwater Quality Sustainability, Krakow, 12-17 September 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Yaouti, F., El Mandour, A., Khattach, D., Benavente, J. and Kaufmann, O. (2009) Salinization Processes in the Unconfined Aquifer of Bou-Areg (NE Morocco). Applied Geochemistry, 24, 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.10.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouzana, L., Ben Mammou, A. and Sfar Felfoul, M. (2009) Seawater Intrusion and Associated Processes: Case of the Korba Aquifer (Cap-Bon, Tunisia). Surface Geosciences (Hydrology-Hydrogeology). Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 341, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2008.09.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eneke, G.T., Ayonghe, S.N., Chandrasekharam, D., Ntchancho, R., Ako, A.A., Mouncherou, O.F., et al. (2011) Controls on Groundwater Chemistry in a Highly Urbanised Coastal Area. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5, 475-490.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Batayneh, A.T. (2006) Use of Electrical Resistivity Methods for Detecting Subsurface Fresh and Saline Water and Delineating Their Interfacial Configuration: A Case Study of the Eastern Dead Sea Coastal Aquifers. Hydrogeology Journal, 14, 1277-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0034-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (1989) Health Guidelines for the Use of Wastewater in Agriculture and Aquaculture. Report of WHO Scientific Group-Technical Report Series 778, WHO, Geneva, 74 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2004) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. 3rd Edition, Geneva, 514 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dinesh, K.T. and Singh Chandel, C.P. (2010) Analysis of the Major Ion Constituents in Groundwater of Jaipur City. Nature and Science, 8, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deshpande, S.M. and Aher, K.R. (2012) Evaluation of Groundwater Quality and Its Suitability for Drinking and Agriculture Use in Parts of Vaijapur, District Aurangabad, MS. India Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, 2, 25-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wirmvem, M.J., Ohba, T., Fantong, W.Y., Ayonghe, S.N., Suila, J.Y., Asaah, A.N.E., et al. (2013) Hydrochemistry of Shallow Groundwater and Surface Water in the Ndop Plain, North West Cameroon. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7, 518-530. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2013.1456</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyedele, K.F. and Momoh, E.I. (2009) Evaluation of Sea Water Intrusion in Freshwater Aquifers in a Lagoon Coast: A Case Study of the University of Lagos Lagoon, Akoka, Nigeria. New York Science Journal, 2, 32-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Terzic, J., Markovic, T. and Pekas, Z. (2008) Influence of Sea-Water Intrusion and Agricultural Production on the Blato Aquifer, Island of Korcula, Croatia. Environmental Geology, 54, 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0841-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adebo, B.A. and Adetoyinbo, A.A. (2009) Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Unconsolidated Sedimentary Coastal Aquifer in Lagos State, Nigeria. Scientific Research and Essay, 4, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667609491674</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adekunle, A.A. (2008) Delineation of Saltwater Intrusion into the Freshwater Aquifer of Lekki Peninsula, Lagos, Nigeria.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ginzburg, A. and Levanon, A. (1976) Determination of a Saltwater Interface by Electric Resistivity Depth Soundings. Hydrological Sciences-Bulletin, 21, 561-568.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tening, A.S., Chuyong, G.B., Asongwe, G.A., Fonge, B.A., Lifongo, L.L. and Tandia, B.K. (2013) Nitrate and Ammonium Levels of Some Water Bodies and Their Interaction with Some Selected Properties of Soils in Douala Metropolis, Cameroon. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7, 648-656.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonteh, M.L., Fonkou, T. and Lambi, C.M. (2016) Stakeholder Perception of Global warming, Rainfall Variability and Sea Level Rise Hazard Perils in Three Coastal Districts of Douala-Cameroon. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 6, 115-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74107-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonteh, M.L., Fonkou, T.M., Lambi, C.M., Main, R., Ramoelo, A. and Cho, M.A. (2016) Assessing the Utility of Sentinel-1 C Band Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery for Land Use Land Cover Classification in a Tropical Coastal Systems When Compared with Landsat 8. Journal of Geographic Information System, 8, 495-505. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2016.84041</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>