<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Neuroscience</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2000</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjns.2017.71009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJNS-74027</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Clinical Types and Outcome of Minor Ischemic Stroke in Northern China: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guangsheng</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daoming</surname><given-names>Tong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaodong</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tonghui</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yeting</surname><given-names>Zhou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Medical Evaluation Center, The Affiliated Shuyang People’ Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Shuyang People’ Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>tongdaoming@163.com(GW)</email>;<email>tongdaoming@163.com(DT)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>105</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>6,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: As a common and high incidence of disease, the minor ischemic stroke (MIS) has become an important public health problem. The aim of this study was to address whether patients with MIS have different types and outcome in the elderly in northern China. 
  Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients was selected for study; all registered neurologic outpatients of the tertiary teaching hospital in northern Jiangsu, China between February, 2011 and February, 2012. A total of 433 outpatients, clinically only having had an initial visit and a MRI study of the brain, were enrolled. 
  Results: Of 433 outpatients, 247 (57.0%) patients with MIS were diagnosed. The clinical types of MIS included stable MIS in 58.3%, acute progressive MIS in 5.3%, and chronic progressive MIS in 36.4% of patients. After adjusted Odd ratio (OR), only aged (OR, 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007 - 1.087, 
  <em>p</em> = 0.021), episode duration (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.011 - 1.024, 
  <em>p</em> = 0.001), initial number of MIS (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.047 - 1.207, 
  <em>p</em> = 0.001), and infarcts volume (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.253 - 2.681, 
  <em>p</em> = 0.002) were independently associated with stable MIS and progressive MIS. Total survival was favorable among groups (
  <em>p</em> = 0.094), but the followed mRS score was significantly higher among those progressive MIS than those stable MIS (2.3 &#177; 1.0 vs 0.1 &#177; 0.3, 
  <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). 
  Conclusion: MIS had a very high prevalence and different clinical types. Stable MIS is a benign stroke, whereas those progressive MIS may have long-term instability or acute and chronic progressive trend. This information is important in prospectively determining outcome of MIS and in patient treatment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Minor Ischemic Stroke</kwd><kwd> Magnetic Resonance Imaging</kwd><kwd> Incidence</kwd><kwd> Clinical Types</kwd><kwd> Outcome</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>With magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) advances, several epidemiological studies have reported that the incidence of minor ischemic stroke (MIS) is up to 55% - 74% in metropolitan regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref2">2</xref>] , showing MIS is a common ischemic stroke appearing in world regions. In such studies, small stroke or lacunar stroke was usually considered favorable short-term outcome and having had a very low NIHSS score, so this is why it is considered a MIS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref4">4</xref>] . In fact, it has been shown that MIS may also result from atheromatous stenosis or occlusion of larger arteries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref6">6</xref>] , in which the presence of one or more lesions may be associated with a rapidly progressive deficit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref9">9</xref>] , or even carry a worse prognosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref10">10</xref>] . Thus, MIS has become a common concern public health problem. However, because of MIS’s lack of an available clinical classification, it has long been a controversy whether MIS is a benign stroke or not. The aim of present study is to clarify and define the features in clinical types, survival rate, and outcome of MIS in older adults from the villages and towns in northern China.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Population</title><p>From February 2011 to February 2012, a retrospective cohort of new patients was selected for study, all enrolled neurologic outpatients of the tertiary teaching hospital in northern Jiangsu, China. A total of 433 neurologic outpatients, clinically only having had their initial visit and having undergone the MRI studies of the brain, were prospective registered. The sample consisted of males and females, aged 40 years or older, residing in 38 villages or towns and one urban area in Shuyang. The study was approved by<sup> </sup>the Ethical Committee on Clinical Research of the Shuyang People’ hospital, China. All participants gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Clinical investigations were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Identified of Patients</title><p>We evaluated those outpatients who had an ischemic stroke based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10). In this study, the inclusion criteria of MIS were as follows: 1) first visit indicating minor brain symptoms, with or without minor positive signs of stroke, and measured as ≤3 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS); 2) an MRI displaying visible MIS as a small infarcts within 24 hours of initial presentation, or lacunar lesions or increased brain signal using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), with a location in the subcortical white matter, the basal ganglia, or the brain stem. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age &lt; 25 years; 2) previous history of stroke diagnosed; 3) infarct size &gt; 25 mm; or 4) an NIHSS score of &gt;3 on first visit.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Collection</title><p>Information obtained from each patient at baseline included data on gender, age, body mass index (BMI), episode duration, clinical manifestations, and the imaging of brain MRI in initial visit. The following risk factors were obtained from outpatients registered: BMI measured at baseline was categorized as normal (BMI &lt; 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), overweight (25 - 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), or obese (&gt;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Hypertension was defined if a patient had a clinical history of hypertension, or had two or more previously documented systolic blood pressures &gt; 160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressures &gt; 90 mm Hg. Diabetes mellitus was deemed present if the patient gave a history of the condition that was confirmed in the medical records, or there was a random blood glucose concentration of &gt;11 mmol/l. Dyslipidemia was deemed present if total venous plasma cholesterol level &gt; 6.0 mmol/L, LDL fraction &gt; 3.0 mmol/L, triglyceride level &gt; 1.8 mmol/L. Coronary heart disease was defined as a history of acute myocardial infarction or angina pectoris. Atrial fibrillation indicated present when seen on an electrocardiogram during the initial visit or when it was reported in medical records. Cigarette smoking was defined as a last 5 years.</p><p>All MR (performed with 1.5-T equipment) studies were reviewed by a neuroradiologist and a neurologist who were blinded to the study. The examiners looked specifically for hyperintense<sup> </sup>lesions on FLAIR or DWI, measuring maximum diameters when present and attempting to correlate MR findings with clinical status. The number and location of lesions were recorded in detail for each patient.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Outcome Evaluation</title><p>A neurology specialist who made the baseline assessments followed patients until 6 months after their index event or the time of death if it occurred before that date. All patients were reassessed during the 6 months follow-up, and were classified as “no symptoms or minor symptoms” (score 0 or 1), “lifestyle restriction” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref3">3</xref>] , “dependent” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref5">5</xref>] according to the stroke-related handicap scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref11">11</xref>] , and “death” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref6">6</xref>] in our study. The follow-up information was gathered by the same neurology specialist, who conducted inquiries by phone. If the patient was dead or otherwise not assessable, information was obtained from the patient’s closest relative or another reliable proxy (follow-up began in Jan 2013 and ended in Jun 2013).</p><p>The criteria of a clinical classification for subtypes of MIS were applied that combined clinical data (including the severity and duration of mRS score during the follow-up) with the results of MRI so that strokes could be classified into several “outcome distinct” groups. In accordance with clinical features and followed mRS score, two types of MIS were delineated: 1) Stable MIS: those MIS with a stable or benign course [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref4">4</xref>] , and with a followed mRS score of 0 - 1; 2) Progressive MIS: including two subtypes (a) acute progressive MIS: any symptoms rapidly progress or recurrent new symptoms, and lesions rapidly evolution or extension during the first 7 days after onset; or adds at least 1 point to scores by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref8">8</xref>] , and with a followed mRS score of 2 - 6 at 6 months follow-up; (b) chronic progressive MIS: symptoms slowly occurring for more than a few months; frequent transient symptoms or new ischemic event tend to progress slowly; or with chronic progressive neurologic decline and normal pressure hydrocephalus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref12">12</xref>] , or chronic or acute-on- chronic white matter ischaemia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref13">13</xref>] , and with a mRS score of 2 - 6 at 6 months follow-up.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Related Definition</title><p>The transient symptoms included transient ischemic attack (TIA) and transient neurological attack (TNA). The newly proposed definition of TIA is a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord, or retinal ischemia, without acute infarction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref14">14</xref>] . TNA is defined as attacks with temporary (&lt;24 hours) neurological symptoms, and these symptoms can be focal, nonfocal, or a mixture of both [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>The syndromes classified by Fisher, namely pure sensory stroke, pure motor syndromes, ataxic hemiparesis, dysarthria clumsy hand, and sensorimotor stroke, were included in this study. The atypical, nonfocal or mixed symptoms such as headache or/and dizziness which can be attributed to a MIS, were summed as follow.</p><p>Headache/migraine is a common symptom and risk factor for cerebrovascular disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref17">17</xref>] . Dizziness/vertigo is also a common cerebrovascular symptom [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref18">18</xref>] , and dizziness or vertigo has an increased risk of developing vascular events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref20">20</xref>] . The above dizziness and headache may develop alternately or together. These problems are usually recurring. The duration of symptoms can be from minutes to hours (generally &lt; 24 hours), although some may be re- current or continuous for a few days or more.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>All numeric variables were expressed as the mean &#177; SD or median (interquartile range [IQR]). Fisher’s Exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to explore the relationship among baseline patient variables. Continuous variables<sup> </sup>were compared using the t test. Univariate analyses were used to determine risk factors of MIS. Logistic regression analyses for risk factors between stable MIS and progressive MIS were used to calculate Odd ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and probability values. Kaplan-Meier method and test were used to estimate the differences in survival between groups. Multivariate regression analysis by Cox proportional hazards model was performed for each baseline factor. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with level of<sup> </sup>significance set at P &lt; 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Of 433 outpatients, 247 (57%) patients with MIS were diagnosed according to findings on brain MRI. 90% of patients with MIS were released at home received aspirin treatment. The rest (about 10%) were admitted to a neurologic ward.</p><p>Features of subtype among patients with MIS</p><p>Baseline characteristics and types of MIS on out-patient clinic and during a follow-up are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The<sup> </sup>stable MIS was most frequent (58.3%). Transient symptoms (TIAs or TNAs) were observed in up to 80% of stable MIS patients. With acute or subacute onset and relatively stable symptoms, a 8.6-day median (range 1017 days) was recorded for these stable episodes. The stable MIS was solitary in 19 patients and multiple in 125.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical characteristics by disease type in patients with MIS<sup>*</sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Stable MIS (N = 144)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >progressive</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MIS</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AP-MIS (N = 13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CP-MIS (N = 90)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male gender (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 (50.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (69.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (44.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.460</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median age, years (range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57 (40 - 84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 (65 - 83)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 (42 - 85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residing in villages or towns</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135 (93.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (92.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 (94.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.948</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residing in county urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (6.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (7.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (5.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.948</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Median episode duration, days (range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6 (1017)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 (5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180 (2879)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SBP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.3 &#177; 20.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.9 &#177; 23.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.6 &#177; 22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.139</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DBP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.3 &#177; 10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8 &#177; 10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.4 &#177; 13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blood glucose (mmol/l, mean &#177; SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7 &#177; 1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9 &#177; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Migraine/headache (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (23.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (7.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (22.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.336</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >its TIAs or TNAs (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (88.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (100.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.151</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dizziness/vertigo (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (36.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (38.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (20.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >its TIAs or TNAs (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (88.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (100.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Headache and dizziness (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (23.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (30.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (34.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.194</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >its TNAs (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (76.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (90.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pure sensory stroke (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (11.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (15.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (16.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.414</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >its TIAs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (81.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (66.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.429</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pure motor hemiparesis (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (2.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (46.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gait disorderss (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (5.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (15.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (10.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.317</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Miscellaneous (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (2.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.787</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single LI (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (15.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic lacunes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leukoaraiosis (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (0.14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (7.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (14.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal pressure hydrocephalus (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (5.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial median lesions number (range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5 (18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (105)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial median infarcts volume (cm<sup>3</sup>, range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 (4.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1 (9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 (8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial median NIHSS score (range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 (3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2 (3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial median ABCD2 score (range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8 (7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Followed median mRS score (range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2 (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mortality (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (7.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.074</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>MIS = Minor ischemic stroke; AP-MIS = Acute progressive MIS; CP-MIS = Chronic progressive MIS; TIA = Transient ischemic attack; TNA = Transient neurological attack; SBP = Systolic blood pressure; DBP = Diastolic blood pressure; NIHSS = national Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; ABCD2 = Age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of symptoms, and presence or absence of diabetes; scores range from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater risk of stroke; mRS = modified Rankin scale.</p><p>The acute progressive type of MIS (AP-MIS) was the least frequent (5.3%) and rapid deterioration was fairly typical, running a 2.5-day median course (range 5 days). Such lesions rapidly progressed, in a matter of hours or days, to affect multiple areas supplied by deep perforators, either individually or in aggregate as relatively large infarctions.</p><p>Chronic progressive type of MIS (CP-MIS) is the moderate frequency (36.4%), marked by an unstable clinical course and relatively slow progression (median course of 180 days). With this type of MIS, transient symptoms (TIAs or TNAs ) developed in 85.5% of those afflicted. On MRI, all instances were multifocal MIS and from one vascular supply slowly involves other sources. Eventually, many regions of the brain were affected, signaling anterior and posterior circulatory compromise.</p><p>Features of clinical symptoms in patient with MIS</p><p>There was no difference in gender, SBP, DBP, blood glucose, headache/ migraine, dizziness and headache, pure sensory stroke, gait disorders, miscellaneous, and mortality among stable MIS, AP-MIS, and CP-MIS. Single MIS and dizziness/vertigo were more prevalent in stable MIS than in progressive MIS (p &lt; 0.05). Older age, pure motor hemiparesis, and high NIHSS score were significantly more prevalent in AP-MIS than in stable MIS and CP-MIS (p &lt; 0.05). Longer episode duration, chronic lesion, leukoaraiosis, and normal pressure hydrocephalus were significantly more prevalent in CP-MIS than in stable MIS and AP-MIS (p &lt; 0.05). The number of lesions, volume of infarcts, INHSS score, and ABCD<sup>2</sup> score were significantly higher in AP and CP-MIS than in stable MIS (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Risk factors and early prediction in patient with MIS</p><p>Demographics and risk factor profiles in patients with stable MIS and those with progressive MIS were<sup> </sup>compared (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The multivariate logistic regression showed that there was no significantly difference in sex, BMI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, heart disease, heavy alcohol drinker, and current smoking between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). Nevertheless, only the age (OR = 1.059, 95% CI = 1.026 - 1.982, p = 0.001) was a risk factor associated with the stable MIS and progressive MIS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Outcome and survival rate among patients with MIS</p><p>The difference was significantly greater when the analysis was confined to followed median mRS score between the stable MIS and the progressive MIS (median 0.2 score versus 2 score, p = 0.001), and the respective mortality rates were 0% in stable MIS and 1.9% in progressive MIS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Logistic regression analysis of the likelihood of prognosis after adjusted odd ratios (OR) for the baseline and clinical features, only aged (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.007 - 1.087, p = 0.021), episode duration (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.011 - 1.024, p = 0.000), initial number of MIS (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.047 - 1.207, p = 0.001), and infarcts volume (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.253 - 2.681, p = 0.002) were independently associated with stable MIS and progressive MIS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Survival data were available for our patients with MIS (only two cases of pa-</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The baseline risk factor comparison between stable MIS and progressive MIS: OR for each risk factor</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable MIS (N = 144)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Progressive MIS (N = 103)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >OR (95%CI for OR)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male gender (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 (50.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (47.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4 (0.767 - 2.731)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.254</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (y, mean &#177; SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2 &#177; 10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.7 &#177; 11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 (1.025 - 1.081)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI ( kg/m<sup>2</sup>, mean &#177; SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.9 &#177; 2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.9 &#177; 3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 (0.939 - 1.129)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.533</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87 (60.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59 (47.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 (0.396 - 1.225)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.209</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diabetes mellitus (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (6.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (9.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 (0.625 - 4.709)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.295</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coronary heart disease (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (3.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 (0.067 - 2.034)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.253</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atrial fibrillation (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 (0.089 - 28.77)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.749</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hyperlipidemia (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83 (57.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 (56.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8 (0.462 - 1.423)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.465</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy alcohol drinker (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (29.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (16.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 (0.222 - 1.036)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.061</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current smoking (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (28.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (19.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 (0.265 - 1.284)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.181</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>MIS = Minor ischemic stroke; OR = Odd ratio; CI = Confidence intervals; BMI = Body mass index.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Logistic regression analysis for the likelihood of prognosis after adjustment for the baseline and clinical features in stable MIS and progressive MIS</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable MIS (mean &#177; SD)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Progressive MIS (mean &#177; SD)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >OR (95%CI for OR)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (y)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2 &#177; 10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.7 &#177; 11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 (1.007 - 1.087)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Episode duration (day)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.3 &#177; 87.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321.7 &#177; 505.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 (1.011 - 1.024)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial lesions number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3 &#177; 4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4 &#177; 18.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 (1.047 - 1.207)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial infarcts volume (cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1 &#177; 2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 (1.253 - 2.618)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>MIS = Minor ischemic stroke; OR = Odd ratio; CI = Confidence intervals.</p><p>tients lost to follow-up), with a mean follow-up of 180 days. A total of two patients due to the progress of MIS died during follow-up. Survival rate was slightly higher among patients with stable MIS than among those with progressive MIS, but the difference was small (Log rank 2.8; p = 0.094). In Cox proportional hazards analysis, the interaction between the effect of mRS score and type of MIS on survival was significant (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.049 - 6.461, p = 0.039).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>With increasing longevity, existing clinical data indicate a 55% - 74% incidence of MIS in metropolitan areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref2">2</xref>] . However, in an out-patient setting from the county town and villages in patients over the age of 40 years, our findings show a 57.0% rate of MIS and with different types in clinical.</p><p>Some MIS with a stable course and a good prognosis have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref4">4</xref>] . Within our out-patient clinic setting, the stable MIS occurred with greatest frequency, accounting for 58.3% of patients. Nevertheless, we found that those with stable MIS were younger than those AP-MIS and CP-MIS, possibly due to the presence of a potentially small-artery disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Progressive MIS had been proposed by Bang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref9">9</xref>] and Fisher [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref12">12</xref>] . On our out-patient clinic, 5.3% of AP-MIS and 36.4% of CP-MIS were diagnosed. The clinical features of CP-MIS are multiple lesions, recurrent transient symptoms, longer duration (median course of 180 days). It is noted that those patients with recurrent transient symptoms for more than a 180-days median should be estimated to its having a long duration of TIAs or TNAs. The recurrent TIA symptoms or ischemic event is highest in the first month and year among those with a long history of onset [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref21">21</xref>] , probably reflecting the vascular stenosis of the parent artery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref6">6</xref>] , or presence of active, unstable atherosclerotic plapue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Acute progressive type of MIS occurred in 4.5% - 6.8% of the patients with MIS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref9">9</xref>] , even high to 15.2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref22">22</xref>] , and was often due to stenosis or occlusion of the middle cerebral artery and proximal segments of its deep perforating branches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref24">24</xref>] . However, patients experiencing rapid deterioration of MIS, especially sudden and progressive symptoms (not limited to motor deficits), and needing emergency care should rightly be included here. The present study showed that, in older individuals, MIS were more likely to show rapid, focal expansion (a 2.5-day median course).</p><p>Previous studied has been shown that the survival rate in MIS hospitalized was 97% at 1 year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref25">25</xref>] . In the present study, the survival rate of stable MIS is 100%, while the survival rate of progressive MIS is 98.1%. This suggests that the survival rate between patients with stable MIS and progressive MIS is small different. However, we have confirmed that overall survival rate in patients with MIS in the out-patient clinic during the follow-up period of 6 months is favorable (99.2%). Our view is consistent with more studies reported survival of MIS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref10">10</xref>] . Although there are one to two reports described poor survival [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref27">27</xref>] , we still believe that the survival status in patients with MIS have a favorable trends.</p><p>But then, this does not mean that the survival quality of MIS patients will be long-term stability and excellent health. Moreover, we have shown that the median mRS score in progressive MIS in the follow-up 6 months was significantly higher than those stable MIS. This finding suggests that progressive MIS may have long-term instability or acute and chronic progressive trend. Some studies have shown that the trends of prognosis for MIS related to the burden of atherosclerosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref27">27</xref>] . In fact, in addition to the presence of vascular risk factors can accelerate the progress of atherosclerosis, the aging is also its important mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74027-ref28">28</xref>] . This has been confirmed by our present study.</p><p>Some limitations of our study are conceded. Because the mRS gap for each of the subgroups were very narrow, misclassification between stable MIS and progressive MIS may be presented by the data on phone. In fact, these mRS scores were markedly differences between the “no symptoms or minor symptoms” (score 0 or 1) and “lifestyle restriction” (2 - 3). Therefore, we believe that at most a very small case would have misclassified in the inquiries. In addition, the absence of a repeated MRI or vascular imaging data from some patients may be affected the predictors for patients with progressive MIS as well as recurrent events.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>MIS had a very high prevalence and different clinical types. Stable MIS is a benign stroke, whereas those progressive MIS may have long-term instability or acute and chronic progressive trend. This information is important in determining outcome of MIS and in patient treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work is supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council, affiliated Shuyang People’s Hospital, XuZhou Medical University, China.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Sources of Funding</title><p>Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project of Jiangsu Provence (20120013).</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wang, G.S., Tong, D.M., Chen, X.D., Yang, T.H. and Zhou, Y.T. (2017) Clinical Types and Outcome of Minor Ischemic Stroke in Northern China: A Retrospective Cohort Study. World Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjns.2017.71009</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.74027-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, L, Chao, Y, Zhao, X, Liu, L, Wang, C, Wang, D.Z., et al. (2013) Factors Associated with Delayed Presentation in Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke in China: Analysis of Data from the China National Stroke Registry (CNSR). Neurological Research, 35, 517-521. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chandratheva, A., Lasserson, D.S., Geraghty, O.C. and Rothwell, P.M. (2010) Oxford Vascular Study. Population-Based Study of Behavior Immediately after Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke in 1000 Consecutive Patients: Lessons for Public Education. Stroke, 41, 1108-1114.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fischer, U., Baumgartner, A., Arnold, M., Nedeltchev, K., Gralla, J., De Marchis, G.M., et al. (2010) What Is a Minor Stroke? Stroke, 41, 661-666.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572883</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bang, O.Y., Joo, S.Y., Lee, P.H., Joo, U.S., Lee, J.H., Joo, I.S., et al. (2004) The Course of Patients with Lacunar Infarcts and a Parent Arterial Lesion: Similarities to Large Artery vs Small Artery Disease. Archives of Neurology, 61, 514-519.  
https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.4.514</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Norrving, B. and Cronqvist, S. (1989) Clinical and Radiologic Features of Lacunar versus Nonlacunar Minor Stroke. Stroke, 20, 59-64.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.20.1.59</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bang, O.Y., Heo, J.H., Kim, J.Y., Park, J.H. and Huh, K. (2002) Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Is a Major Clinical Determinant in Striatocapsular Small, Deep Infarction. Archives of Neurology, 59, 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.59.2.259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferrari, J., Knoflach, M., Kiechl, S., Willeit, J., Schnabl, S., Seyfang, L., et al. (2010) Early Clinical Worsening in Patients with TIA or Minor Stroke: The Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Neurology, 74, 136-141.  
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c9188b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, D.K., Kim, J.S., Kwon, S.U., Yoo, S.H. and Kang, D.W. (2005) Lesion Patterns and Stroke Mechanism in Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Disease: Early Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Study. Stroke, 36, 2583-2588.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000189999.19948.14</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, J.T., Kim, H.J., Yoo, S.H., Park, M.S., Kwon, S.U., Cho, K.H., et al. (2010)MRI Findings May Predictearly Neurologic Deterioration in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Due to Intracranial Atherosclerosis. European Neurology, 64, 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1159/000315138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Staals, J., van Raak, L., Hilton, A. and Lodder, J. (2008) Differences in Long-Term Survival in Two Lacunar Stroke Types: A 15-Year Follow-Up Study in 782 Cerebral Infarct Patients. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 25, 26-31.  
https://doi.org/10.1159/000111496</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Micheli, S., Agnelli, G., Palmerini, F., Caso, V., Venti, M., Alberti, A., et al. (2008) Need for Extensive Diagnostic Work-Up for Patients with Lacunar Stroke. Journal of Neurology, 255, 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0762-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurent, S., Boutouyrie, P. and Lacolley, P. (2005) Structural and Genetic Bases of Arterial Stiffness. Hypertension, 45, 1050-1055.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000164580.39991.3d</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farkas, E. and Luiten, P.G. (2001) Small-Vessel Disease Increases with Age and Is Accelerated by Vascular Risk Factors, Most Notably, Hypertension and Diabetes. Progress in Neurobiology, 64, 575-611.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00068-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ju,Y., Zhao, X.Q., Wang, C.X., Wang, Y.L., Liu, G.F. and Wang, Y.J. (2013) Neurological Deterioration in the Acute Phase of Minor Ischemic Stroke Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Outcomes at 1 Year: Results from the China National Stroke Registry (CNSR). Chinese Medical Journal, 126, 3411-3416.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hankey, G.J. (2003) Long-Term Outcome after Ischaemic Stroke/Transient Ischaemic Attack. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 16, 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000069936</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamasoba, T., Kikuchi, S., Higo, R., Kaga, K., O’uchi, T. and Tokumaru, A. (1993) Ischemic Brain Lesions in Aged Patients with Dizziness. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head &amp; Neck Surgery, 119, 1346-1350.  
https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1993.01880240084010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okroglic, S., Widmann, C.N., Urbach, H., Scheltens, P. and Heneka, M.T. (2013) Clinical Symptoms and Risk Factors in Cerebral Microangiopathy Patients. PLoS ONE, 8, e53455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053455</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cloutier, J.F. and Saliba, I. (2008) Isolated Vertigo and Dizziness of Vascular Origin. Journal of Otolaryngology—Head &amp; Neck Surgery, 37, 331-339.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stang, P.E., Carson, A.P., Rose, K.M., Mo, J., Ephross, S.A., Shahar, E., et al. (2005) Headache, Cerebrovascular Symptoms, and Stroke: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Neurology, 64, 1573-1577.  
https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000158326.31368.04</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bousser, M.G. and Welch, K.M. (2005) Relation between Migraine and Stroke. Lancet Neurology, 4, 533-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70164-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bos, M.J., van Rijn, M.J., Witteman, J.C., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P.J. and Breteler, M.M. (2007) Incidence and Prognosis of Transient Neurological Attacks. JAMA, 298, 2877-2885. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.24.2877</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Easton, J.D., Saver, J.L., Albers, G.W., et al. (2009) Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 40, 2276-2293. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.192218</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mathers, S.E., Chambers, B.R., Merory, J.R. and Alexander, I. (1987) Subcortical Arteriosclerotic Encephalopathy: Binswanger’s Disease. Clinical and Experimental Neurology, 23, 67-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fisher, C.M. (1982) Lacunar Strokes and Infarcts: A Review. Neurology, 32, 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.32.8.871</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Swieten, J.C., Koudstaal, P.J., Visser, M.C., Schouten, H.J.A. and van Gijn, J. (1998) Interobserver Agreement for the Assessment of Handicap in Stroke Patients. Stroke, 19, 604-607. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van Wijk, I., Lindeman, E., Kappelle, L.J., van Gijn, J., Koudstaal, P.J., Gorter, J.W., et al. (2006) Functional Status and Use of Healthcare Facilities in Long-Term Survivors of Transient Ischaemic Attack or Minor Ischaemic Stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &amp; Psychiatry, 77, 1238-1243.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.089391</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogata, T., Yasaka, M., Wakugawa, Y., Ibayashi, S. and Okada, Y. (2009) Predisposing Factors for Acute Deterioration of Minor Ischemic Stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 287, 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74027-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamamoto, Y., Ohara, T., Hamanaka, M., Hosomi, A., Tamura, A., Akiguchi, I., et al. (2010) Predictive Factors for Pregressive Motor Deficits in Penetrating Artery Infarctions in Two Different Arterial Territories. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 288, 170-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.065</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>