<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2017.83024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-73902</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Regeneration of &lt;i&gt;in Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Shoot and Root Structure through Hormone Manipulation of Coconut (MATAG F2) Zygotic Embryos
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>R. Zuraida</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kumeran</surname><given-names>G. Sentoor</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N.</surname><given-names>Ahmad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Farhanah</surname><given-names>M. S. Syahirah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nazreena</surname><given-names>O. Ayu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Crop Science and Soil Science Research Centre, MARDI Hilir Perak, Perak, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Biotechnology &amp;amp; Nanotechnology Research Centre, MARDI Headquarters, Persiaran MARDI-UPM, Serdang, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>340</fpage><lpage>348</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>4,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>1,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>4,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Zygotic embryos tissues have found to be more responsive explants for clonal propagation of coconut. In the present study, the feasibility of using zygotic embryos explants for clonal propagation of a local coconut variety MATAG F2 was assessed. Callus was induced by incorporating of cytokinin and auxin into the medium. The sliced embryos explants were immersed in 1 M maltose for 60 mins, then with 0.05 M maltose for 1 min and followed by 0.01 M maltose for 5 mins was the best for prevention of phenolic compounds excretion. The callus formation depended on the concentration of 2,4-D in the media and the best effect was observed with the high level (2,4-D and BAP) tested. Attempts at inducing multiple shoot from the zygotic embryos callus were unsuccessful. No multiple shoots was present
  ;
   most of the callus bec
  a
  me
   
  root structure.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hormone Manipulation</kwd><kwd> Plant Growth Regulator</kwd><kwd> MATAG Coconut</kwd><kwd> Zygotic Embryo</kwd><kwd> Callus Induction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Coconut is a very important crop for millions of people in tropical countries. There are many varieties that describe for coconut trees, for example “talls”, “dwarfs” or hybrids between them. Tall varieties often live for 70 years or more. Many varieties have local names and they refer to their main use or appearance. There is a close relationship between the health of the leaves and the number of coconuts. Taking good care of coconut trees and not removing too many leaves for other uses will normally result in more coconuts. Demand for coconuts has grown upwards to 500 percent in the last decade. This is because coconut-based derivatives, such as soaps, virgin coconut oil, coconut water and health products and which has been shown in demand, so that producers may not be able to keep up. According to APCC (the Asian and Pacific Coconut Community), many plantations across Asia are experiencing zero growth, and some are even ceasing production. Then most of the farmers switch their focus to oil palm production. To date, coconut suppliers are struggling to meet the increasing demands of the global economy. A continuity to be profitable ventures in the future, to ensure farms are sustainable enough to stand the tests of time and meet future demands therefore, increase the plantation is one of the strategies. Early intentions have been made to micropropagate coconut through different explants such as immature inflorescence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref1">1</xref>] , tender leaf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref2">2</xref>] , and immature zygotic embryo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref3">3</xref>] . Callus form coconut endosperm initiated using modified medium with IAA and BAP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref4">4</xref>] . According to Chan et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref5">5</xref>] clones from embryos were likely to show many of the desired characteristics of the parent palms. The present study reports the progress of callus regeneration of local coconut varieties (MATAG F2) using zygotic embryos.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material, Aseptic Culture and Browning Secretion</title><p>The experiments of this study were carried out at Tissue Culture Research Laboratory, Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Research Central, Malaysia Agriculture Research &amp; Development Institute in order to investigate the response of the coconut (MATAG F2) zygotic embryos under the effect of different concentrations of cytokinin (BAP) and auxin (NAA, 2,4-D), and different segment of zygotic for callus induction and regeneration. A zygotic embryo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) was conducted in the laminar flow chamber to reduce the risk of contamination. The laminar flow was cleaned with 70% ethanol before commencing work. The zygotic embryos were removed from the seeds using the scalpel blades and forceps. Zygotic embryos of MATAG coconut were and sterilized by immersion in 50% ethanol for 2 min, then in 1% Vircon for 30 min. This was followed by further sterilization in Clorox (sodium hypochlorite, 5.2%), first with the embryos immersed in 50% Clorox for 40 min, followed by immersion in 10% Clorox for 20 min. After rinsing three times in sterile distilled water, the embryos were cut into three segment and named as top, middle and bottom segment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The segments were immersed in maltose solution at different concentrations with three different times. The explants was immersed in 0.5 M maltose for 30 mins and then treated with 0.05 M maltose for 1 min, followed by 0.01 M maltose for 5 mins. The others treatment of immersion were listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. After immersion, the segment then cultured on the specified media and incubated for one month at 26˚C &#177; 2˚C in dark. The cultured embryos were then observed and the percentage of browning recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Callus Induction and Regeneration</title><p>The sterilized explants (top, middle and bottom segment) were immersed in 1 M maltose for 60 mins and then treated with 0.05 M maltose for 1 min, followed by 0.01 M maltose for 5 mins. Then, the explants were placed in each 150 ml flask containing 40 mL MS media and respective 2,4-D concentration 0, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg/L combined with BAP (1.0 and 5.0 mg/L) or NAA (1.0 and 5.0 mg/L ) as listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> for callus inintiation. The MS media added with 0.1 g arginine, 0.1 asparagine, 0.1 g glutamine, 3.0% sucrose, 0.3% gelrite agar for gelling. A total of 20 flasks containing 3 sliced zygotic embryos were used for each treatment and repeated twice. Medium sterilization was performed by autoclaving at 121˚C for 15 mins. The medium pH was adjusted to 5.7 - 5.8 before adding agar. Visual growths of callus were recorded after 3 - 4 months in culture.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Histological Analysis</title><p>Zygotic embryos were fixed in a FAA solution for 12 - 24 hours, dehydrated through a series of ethanol solution and embedded in paraffin wax. The specimen were sectioned at 3 - 4 μm and stained with 0.5% (w/v) fast green and 0.25% (w/v) safranin. The stained samples were observed under a light microscope equipped with a camera connecting to the computer system.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>All data were calculated by the mean of the twenty individual experiments. Each experiments were designed in CRD (Complete randomized design) which followed by two replicates. All mean data were analyzed by one way ANOVA via SPSS software version 20. Comparisons of the mean data and standard error (S.E) were determined by Turkey’s multiple range tests at P &lt; 0.05 level of significance.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Influence of Maltose on Browning Secretion in Zygotic Embryos Culture</title><p>Browning occurring in tissue culture of coconut zygotic embryos restrained the induction and growth of callus and the process of regeneration. In coconut tissue culture, explants browning and subsequent explants death was the first issue need to be overcome. Maltose has demonstrated that phenolic secretion problems reduced when it was added into immersion solution medium. The results showed that maltose can control browning obviously, in which treatment of 1 M, 0.05 and 0.01 M of maltose for 60, 1, and 5 mins, respectively was optimal to prevent browning of explants. In addition, they showed only 20% of browning (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Application of maltose of 1 M eliminated browning effectively compared to 0.5 M. Culturing of Primula vulgaris in half-strength MS with 0.1 M maltose was limited in browning and callus induction observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref6">6</xref>] . Previous reports have also found maltose to be a better carbon source for regeneration, which supplementation of 4% maltose showed best results for per cent callus induction (90.33%), embryogenic callus formation (57.66%) and shoot regeneration (82.66%) in Japonica Rice Cv. Kitaake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref7">7</xref>] . In 1995, Lentini et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref8">8</xref>] stated that maltose has been described as an agent that may regulate osmotic potential of cellular environment of callus. The use of sucrose might promotes in vitro production of ethylene in excised tissues causing the browning of callus, the substitution of maltose for sucrose could help to protect the calli by reducing the production of ethylene. Similar results that maltose is better sources of carbohydrate in both the subculture and differentiation media were obtained by Lin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Callus Induction and Regeneration</title><p>Three zygotic embryos segments (top, middle and bottom) (Figures 1(a)-(e)) were cultured on callus induction medium containing different plant growth regulators named 2,4-D, BAP and NAA. Histology analysis was done on the segment. Middle segment showed clear and more cambium, which this cambium are merestimatic cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(f)). The cell has potential to be dedifferentiated and become callus. Feher et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref10">10</xref>] reported that meristematic cells have to be dedifferentiated and their cell division cycle has to be activated during</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of maltose at different concentration and immersion time on phenolic secretion (percentage of browning) in sliced embryos explants. Explants cultured on MS medium supplemented with different maltose (0.01 - 1.0 M). Data were collected after 4 weeks of culture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >First immerse</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Second Immerse</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Third immerse</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage of Browning (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose 0.5M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose 0.05 M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose 0.01M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose 1.0 M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose 0.05 M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose 0.01M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Callus initiation and regeneration from zygotic embryos of MATAG F2 coconut. Whole zygotic embryos ((a), (b)), (c) top zygotic embryos, (d) middle zygotic embryos, (e) bottom zygotic embryos, (f) histological observation of zygotic emryos at middle segment, ((g)-(m)) callus, roots and shoots from top segment of embryos, ((n)-(r)) callus and roots structure from middle segment of embyos, (s) cork callus from bottom segment of embryos. Bar in f = 0.5 mm</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2603041x2.png"/></fig><p>the transition. Similar clarification were also reported in other monocot species of Curcuma longa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref11">11</xref>] , Cocus nucifera [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref12">12</xref>] , Phoenix dactylifera [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref13">13</xref>] and Elaeis guineensis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Among different plant growth regulators tested, optimum callus was observed on MS medium supplemented with 2,4-D (20 mg/L) combine with BAP (5 mg/L) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) after 3 - 4 months in culture. Middle segment showed better response in callus induction compared to other part. A decrease in callus induction was observed when 2,4-D was used in combination with different concentrations of NAA. Callus induction was found to increase with increase in the concentration of 2,4-D. Finding by Tahir et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref15">15</xref>] , indicated that percentage of callus formation by adding 2,4-D at 4.0 g/L gave the best result followed by 3.5 mg/L in Saccharum officinarum. As Yusnita and Dwi Hapsoro [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73902-ref16">16</xref>] had done with oil palm using a combination of 100 mg/L 2,4-D with activated charcoal led to higher percentage of callus induction after 7 months of incubation. In addition, the treatment of 2,4-D alone at 3.3 mg/L also resulted in the highest percentage of callus induction.</p><p>After within 7 months, with subculture interval of two months, all bottom segment become single shoot where treatment of 20 mg/l 2,4-D and 1 mg/l BAP showed highest in number of shoot at average 1.2# (Figures 1(m)-(k)). Similar result was observed for the middle segment, 0.8 averages of shoots produced when cultured on this medium. The frequency of root response was greatly influenced by type of segment with plant growth regulator concentration and the best results achieved at 20 g/L 2,4-D and 1 g/L of BAP supplemented. The maximum number of roots was recorded at 21# from the middle segment. More roots generated after sub-cultured and placed into light condition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(q), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(o)). Middle segment is the best for callus induction and regeneration</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of different concentrations and combinations of 2,4-D, BAP and NAA on growth of callus from different segment of embryos (top, middle and bottom segment) that cultured within 3 - 4 moths</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatments (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Visual growth of callus after 3-4 months in culture</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,4-D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BAP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Top segment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Middle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bottom</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,4-D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*? No callus, + growth almost retarded, ++ slow growth and browning, ++ Poor callus, +++ Moderate callus. Data represent means of ten replicates.</p><p>become root segment and there was some root turned browning However, only single shoot observe for this treatment. No shoot obtained from the top segment of embryos and most of them became cork-like structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(r)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The results of this study indicated the possibility of callus inducing of the local variety coconut (MATAG F2) using zygotic embryos explants. The concentration of 2,4-D in the callusing medium was found to be the critical factor determining success in callogenesis. Most favorable callus was observed on MS medium supplemented with 20 mg/L 2,4-D and 5 mg/L BAP which middle segment showed the best response in callus induction. Varying the levels of growth regulator 2,4-D (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and BAP did not show any positive response on the regeneration and multiplication of shoots. No multiple shoots was observed and</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effects of different concentrations of 2, 4-D and BAP on regeneration from embryos and callus</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatments (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Regeneration</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Colour and texture (roots &amp; shoots)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,4-D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BAP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shoots average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*Rooting response (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of root</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Top segment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No roots &amp; shoots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No roots &amp; shoots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No roots &amp; shoots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No roots &amp; shoots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No roots &amp; shoots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 + 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root browning</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Middle segment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 + 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roots white &amp; brown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 + 3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roots white &amp; brown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 + 4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roots white &amp; brown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 + 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roots white</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2 + 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 + 3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single shoots with roots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8 + 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 + 3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single shoots with roots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Bottom segment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single shoots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single shoots with roots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single shoots with roots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single shoots with roots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Two shoots with roots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single shoots with roots</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*root response: - no growth; + slow growth; ++ moderate growth; +++ healthy &amp; fast growth.</p><p>callus turned to root structure. Callus induction of the current protocol should be further improved for mass scale propagation of coconut using zygotic embryos explants.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank to MARDI for supporting this research work under RMK11-coconut grant.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zuraida, A.R., Sentoor, K.G., Ahmad, N., Syahirah, F.M.S. and Ayu, N.O. (2017) Regeneration of in Vitro Shoot and Root Structure through Hor- mone Manipulation of Coconut (MATAG F2) Zygotic Embryos. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 340-348. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.83024</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.73902-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malik, A.S., Boyko, O., Atkar, N. and Young, W.F. (2001) A Comparative Study of MR Imaging Profile of Titanium Pedicle Screws. Acta Radiologica, 42, 291-293.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/028418501127346846</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Branton, R.L. and Blake, J. (1983) Development of Organized Structures in Callus Derived from Explants of Cocos nucifera L. Annals of Botany, 52, 673-678.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raju, C.R., Prakash, K.P., Chandramohan, M. and Iyer, R.D. (1984) Coconut Plantlets from Leaf Tissue Cultures. Plantation Crops, 12, 5-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karunaratne, S. and Periyapperuma, K. (1989) Culture of Immature Embryos of Coconut, Coconut, Cocos nucifera L.: Callus Proliferation and Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Science, 62, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(89)90087-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Olivia</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Agaton</surname><given-names> Evelyn</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> M.T.M. and Dolores</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1989</year>)<article-title>Ramirez. Induction of Callus from Endosperm</article-title><source> Philipp Journal Crop Science</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 127</fpage>-<lpage>132</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, J.L., Saenz, L., Talavera, C., Hornung, R., Robert, M. and Oropeza, C. (1998) Regeneration of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) from Plumule Explants through Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Cell Reports, 17, 515-521.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050434</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sadiye</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mark</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Smedley</surname><given-names> Jinhong</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> L.</surname><given-names> Wendy</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> A.H. and Philip</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Gilmartin. Plant Regeneration from Leaf-Derived Callus Cultures of Primrose (Primula vulgaris)</article-title><source> Hortscience</source><volume> 51</volume>,<fpage> 558</fpage>-<lpage>562</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saroj, K.S., Ajinder, K. and Jagdeep, S.S. (2014) High Frequency Embryogenic Callus Induction and Whole Plant Regeneration in Japonica Rice Cv. Kitaake. Journal Rice Research, 2, 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lentini, Z., Reyes, P., Marinez, C.P. and Roca, W.M. (1995) Androgenesis of Highly Recalcitrant Rice Genotypes with Maltose and Silver Nitrate. Plant Science, 110, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(95)04180-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, Y.J. and Zhang, Q. (2005) Optimising the Tissue Culture Conditions for High Efficiency Transformation of Indica Rice. Plant Cell Reports, 23, 540-547.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0843-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feher, A., Pasternak, T.P. and Dudits, D. (2003) Transition of Somatic Cells to an Embryogenic State. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 74, 201-228.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024033216561</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raju, C.S., Aslam, A. and Shajahan, A. (2015) High-Efficiency Direct Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Leaf Base Explants of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 122, 79-87.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0751-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buffard-Morel, J., Verdeil, J.L. and Pannetier, C. (1992) Embryogenese Somatique du Cocotier (Cocos nucifera L.) a Partir D’explants Foliaires: Etudes Histologiques. Canadian Journal of Botany, 70, 735-741. https://doi.org/10.1139/b92-094</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sané, D., Aberlenc, B.F., Gassama, D.Y.K., Sagna, M., Trouslot, M.F., Duval, Y. and Borgel, A. (2006) Histological Analysis of Callogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis from Cell Suspensions of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Annals of Botany, 98, 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwandiman, J., Pannetier, C. and Michaux, N.F. (1988) Histology of Somatic Embryogenesis from Leaf Explants of the Oil Palm Elaeis guineensis. Annals of Botany, 62, 43-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73902-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tahir, M., Victor, K. and Abdulkadir, S. (2011) The Effect of 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid (2, 4-D) Concentration on Callus Induction in Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 19, 213-217.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>