Plant hormones have pivotal roles in the regulation of plant growth, development, and reproduction [1] . Additionally, they emerged as cellular signal molecules with key functions in the regulation of immune responses to microbial pathogens, insect herbivores, and beneficial microbes [1] . Recent studies indicate that hormones such as abscisic acid (ABA), auxin, gibberellic acid (GA), cytokinin (CK), brassinosteroids (BR) and peptide hormones are implicated in plant defense signaling pathways [2] . In other hand, beside the endogenous production of phytohormones, exogenous phytohormones can be provided by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) [3] [4] . The PGPR produces hormones such as auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins and polyamines [3] . Auxin is an important plant hormone that affects almost all aspects of plant growth and development and immunity [5] . Perturbing auxin homeostasis appears to be a common virulence mechanism, as many pathogens can synthesize auxin-like molecules [5] . This way, the addition of PRGR producers of auxins promotes plant growth and provides protection against pathogens. Bacillus sp., Bacillus subtilis, Mycobacterium sp. and Pseudomonas putida are examples of auxin producers [4] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] . The discovery and study of PGPR require fast and reliable methods for quantifying phytohormones. For auxin and indoles detection, techniques are used such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [3] , thin layer chromatography (TLC) [11] and spectrophotometric techniques with salkowski reagent [12] . Even though these techniques are expensive because of the use of columns and solvents (HPLC) or are not practical for processing big quantity of samples at the same time (TLC). The aim of this study was to develop a microplate method for quantifying auxins, with less number of reagents, and for processing more samples in fewer time. For auxin quantification, calibration curves were realized using 3-indol acetic acid (IAA) dissolved in water, Landy medium or alcohol, and using salkowski reagent. The microplate techniques developed were used to quantify auxins in Bacillus subtilis fermentation broths proved previously as auxin producers.

The purple-pink complexes were observed in the microplate formed by the IAA and the salkowski reagent. R² were gotten from calibration curves and indicates the lineality in the evaluated range. At lower concentration range the R² was higher than at higher concentration. Each solvent presented different linearity. Since IAA dissolves better in alcohol the lineality with ethanol is higher than in other solvents (Table 1).

Auxins concentrations in samples were calculated using the calibration curve with ethanol from 0 to 31.25 ppm, which had the higher R². The auxins concentration calculated for the Bacillus subtilis strains was 2.78 ppm for BS8, 2.59 ppm for BS14 and 18.59 ppm for BSN. The detection of auxins in Bacillus subtilis strains probed that they are able to promote plant growth and they can elicit significant reductions in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts [22] .

Over the years, large efforts have been put in the development of more sensitive and precise methods of analysis and quantification of plant hormone levels in plant tissues and microorganisms. However, although the techniques have evolved, and new methods have been implemented, the sample preparation is still the limiting step of auxin analysis, including extraction, purification and derivatization [23] . The quantification of auxins by salkowski reagent doesn’t need an exhaustive sample preparation. It only requires the separation of the super-

natant by centrifugation after the fermentation time. Even though, the salkowski reagent is not specific for only one type of auxin. The principal auxin detected by salkowski reagent is the IAA but other auxins can also form complex with the reagent. Glickmann and Dessaux [24] demonstrated that the production of Salkowski positive compounds, even at low concentrations, was always correlated with production of IAA or indolepyruvic acid (IPyA). For these reasons the microplate technique should be complement with other technique as chromatography, if the study needs to quantify a specific auxin.

The developed microplate methods show advantages as analysis of large numbers of samples in a short time with low cost. Even GC-MS is technically the best method to measure IAA, because of high sensitivity and specificity [25] [26] , the high cost for setting and maintenance makes it difficult for daily use in ordinary laboratory [25] . The range of lineality of the microplate technique with ethanol and a R² of 0.99 is low related to the studies of Szkop in 2013 [27] who quantified by RP-HPCL samples containing indolic compounds at 0.0625 - 125 ppm, using calibration curves with coefficient of determination (R²) ≥ 0.998, even though samples can be diluted for making an approximation of auxin concentration by microplate technique before using another technique. Meanwhile, Kim and Park [25] established a standard method to quantify IAA based on HPLC, adopting fluorescence detector and Indole-3-propionic acid (IPA) as internal standard and calculated the IAA concentration with the peak area. A microplate method for auxins was realized by Sarwar and Kremer in 1995 [28] , were resulted in 95% less sample and reagent volume and it was faster than the traditional method, since the standard method required each sample by separately. They realized a calibration curve with 6 points from 0 to 40 IAA equivalents (ppm), but it does not specify the solvent where it is realized. Alcohol calibration curves with ethanol got a higher R² because of the IAA solubility properties. Even though it´s important realize calibration curves with other solvents because most of fermentations broths are colorful and it could interference with the UV spectrometer absorbance. Landy medium, a specific medium enriched with tryptophan for auxin production, presented a different color to the salkowski reagent but is still colorful. For this reason, colorless mediums for auxin production must be developed for colorimetric techniques.

The developed method could be used also to quantify auxins production in plants. However, because hormones production occur in very low amounts in plant extracts, and are very rich in interfering substances, especially secondary metabolites, must undergo several purification steps using unrelated separation mechanisms in order to increase purification efficiency. And especially it is important to know which part of the plant contains the highest concentration of auxin. Generally auxins are produced in the meristematic areas of the plant stem although other plant parts, for instance, shoots, roots and leaves may also produce auxins [29] . Auxin concentration varies depending on the influx and efflux from the tissues, its biosynthesis from tryptophan and formation of IAA conjugates [30] . The homeostasis between the endogenous and exogenous auxins contribute in the plant developed and immunology, for these reason the quantification of auxins produced by PGPR is important to select the strain with the right production of phytohormones.

This research was financial by the Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University.

Anguiano-Cabello, J.C., Flores-Olivas, A., Ochoa-Fuentes, Y.M., Arredondo-Valdés, R. and Olalde-Portugal, V. (2017) Fast Detection of Auxins by Microplate Technique. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 171-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.82013