<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CWEEE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2168-1562</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cweee.2017.61005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CWEEE-73071</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Two-Dimensional Modeling of the NAPL Dissolution in Porous Media: Heterogeneities Effects on the Large Scale Permeabilities and Mass Exchange Coefficient
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bernard</surname><given-names>Mabiala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Timothée</surname><given-names>Nsongo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dominique</surname><given-names>Nkounkou Tomodiatounga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Tathy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dominique</surname><given-names>Nganga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Groupe de Recherche sur les les Propriétés Physico-Chimiques et Minérales des Matériaux, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire Mécanique Energétique et Ingénierie, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Polytechnique, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Formation Doctorale Sciences de l’Environnement, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Congo</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>bernamab@yahoo.com(BM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>56</fpage><lpage>78</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>29,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>25,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, we are interested by the dissolution of NAPL (Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid) contaminants in heterogeneous soils or aquifers. The volume averaging technique is applied to 2D systems with Darcy-scale heterogeneities. A large-scale model is derived from a Darcy-scale dissolution model in the case of small and large Damkholer numbers, i.e., for smooth or sharp dissolution fronts. The resulting models in both cases have the mathematical structure of a non-equilibrium dissolution model. It is shown how to calculate the resulting mass exchange and relative permeability terms from the Darcy-scale heterogeneities and other fluid properties. One of the important finding is that the obtained values have a very different behavior compared to the Darcy-scale usual correlations. The large scale correlations are also very different between the two limit cases. The resulting large-scale models are compared favorably to Darcy-scale direct simulations.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Modeling</kwd><kwd> NAPL Dissolution</kwd><kwd> Porous Media</kwd><kwd> Large Scale Average Mass Exchange Coefficient</kwd><kwd> Large Scale Permeabilities</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The mechanisms of migration in aquifers of partially miscible pollutants to water (oil, hydrocarbons…), later denoted NAPL for Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid, are well-known. Two- and three-phase flow mechanisms lead to a more or less dispersed distribution of the organic phase in the aquifer. The prediction of the contaminant plume requires in general solving the transport equations completed with proper initial and boundary conditions. In practice, two classes of model are available. The first class makes use of the assumption of local equilibrium, which translates the fact that the average, Darcy- scale concentrations are close to the pore-scale thermodynamic equilibrium concentrations at the interface between the two phases. Indeed, concerning the modeling of dissolution (water/NAPL transfer), many laboratory works ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref4">4</xref>] ) show situations where thermodynamic equilibrium makes it possible to describe satisfactory the measured data. However, recent studies ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref15">15</xref>] ), show that this assumption, even it is generally usable for small scales, does not fit very well experimental data in the case of large-scale heterogeneous media, or in the case of low NAPL saturations, or when the aqueous phase reaches high velocities. These limitations of the transfer can be induced by heterogeneities at the pore scale, by heterogeneities of the medium or saturations at higher scales, by high velocities of water circulation, by the dispersion of the organic phase, etc. In fact, for a given configuration, there is a scale at which the transfer is well described by the thermodynamic equilibrium assumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref16">16</xref>] . Other works, ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref18">18</xref>] ) affirm that heterogeneities of the porous medium can modify the trajectory of the pollutants significantly and thus lead to a flow which can generate a local non-equilibrium situation. This assertion is defended by Mayer et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref19">19</xref>] who estimate that the modeling of dissolution depends on the knowledge of the heterogeneous distribution of the pollutant in the medium considered. The works of ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref22">22</xref>] ) maintain that the disorder and heterogeneities of the porous medium are responsible at the pore scale of the spatial variations of the mass transfer and that the geometry of the medium significantly affects residual saturation, the volume of distribution of the ganglion and the interfacial surface between the aqueous phase and the non-aqueous phase.</p><p>Recently, experimental works of NAPL dissolution in heterogeneous porous media [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref23">23</xref>] were carried out to measure the spatial and temporal distribution of globules of pollutants. The results obtained by these authors show that the concentrations of NAPL decrease with the reduction of the globules of pollutant. Numerical works of modeling of dissolution ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref27">27</xref>] ) were carried out. These numerical studies show that: 1) the effectiveness of the dissolution of NAPL depends on the heterogeneity of the aquifer which controls the trapping of NAPL; 2) the deviation of the aqueous phase flow resulting from the heterogeneity and the reduction of relative permeability due to the trapping of NAPL prolongs times of dissolution ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref26">26</xref>] ); 3) the morphology of the NAPL source zone, determined by heterogeneity of the porous medium controls dissolution, in other words the precise characterization of the location of the trapped clusters is essential to predict the dissolution flux [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref27">27</xref>] ; 4) when the initial residual saturation is discontinuous, pure water entering in the NAPL source zone can come out again with a certain concentration different or non-equilibrium concentration. Even if in the zones with presence of pollutant, dissolution is of the local equilibrium type, the concentration at the exit can be significantly weaker than equilibrium concentration. Local non- equilibrium situations can thus appear following various mechanisms: effect of heterogeneities at the pore scale and effect of heterogeneities of the medium or initial saturations ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref29">29</xref>] ).</p><p>In recent laboratory experiments, Yra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref30">30</xref>] studied the influence of microscopic and macroscopic heterogeneities of two types of porous media (natural macroscopic homogeneous sandy media or macroscopic heterogeneous media formed by alternation of sand and sandstone strata) on the dissolution of a pollutant, with a special interest on the mass transfer between the aqueous phase and the NAPL trapped at residual saturation. Her results show the importance of the porous medium microscopic and/or macroscopic heterogeneities and that of the distribution of the pollutant. The evolutions of the saturation and concentration fields she obtained reveal a slow rate of dissolution and she concluded that these experimental results show the need to use a macroscopic scale local non-equilibrium model. From these different evidences, one can advance the following conclusion: the differential dissolution in the various media can lead to zones with low pollutant saturation beside zones very rich in the pollutant phase. Even if, at the small scale, the mechanisms of dissolution can be described by a model of local equilibrium type, it is not necessarily the same at the large scale (block of a numerical model including heterogeneities). At this scale, water polluted at equilibrium mixes with non-contaminated water or water polluted a non-equilibrium, and the result gives a concentration smaller than the equilibrium concentration at the exit of the source zone, which is typical of a local non-equilibrium situation. It is therefore important to be able to derive a large-scale NAPL dissolution model from the Darcy-scale description, including the heterogeneity effects.</p><p>The one-dimensional problem was the subject of a first study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref31">31</xref>] . In this paper, the two-dimensional problem is considered: a large-scale NAPL, local non equilibrium dissolution model is built using a volume averaging technique and effective properties such as the large scale relative permeability to water and the large scale mass exchange coefficient are estimated for situations of the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Physical Large Scale Dissolution Model</title><p>In this paper, we consider a stratified model of a heterogeneous porous medium typical of geological systems. The medium is composed of stacks of the elementary pattern described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, and, because of periodicity, we will consider only the evolution of the different physical variables within this two-stratum elementary pattern. The media</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title>Sketch of the 2D problem.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x2.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>are filled initially with water and NAPL. The typical system is made of two different strata (ω, η) of the same length l. Each stratum contains initially NAPL at residual saturation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Pure water is injected at the domain inlet, on the axis (0, y), with a constant Darcy velocity. It is contaminated in pollutant while dissolving the trapped NAPL, and goes out of the domain at a certain concentration, which is one of the important value to be determined by the model for risk analysis. The dissolution front is located by xf. The studied system is a binary system for which we adopt the following notations: the two phases are water, w, and oil, o, and contain each one the two components water (w) and NAPL (o). The strata have a constant porosity ε<sub>ω</sub>, ε<sub>η</sub> and constant permeability k<sub>ω</sub>, k<sub>η</sub>.</p><p>We do not present here the development of the Darcy-scale dissolution model since very detailed and complete developments are available in the literature ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref32">32</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref37">37</xref>] ). Two particular Darcy-scale cases are considered: local equilibrium situation and local non-equilibrium situations. Large scale model equations were established in a previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref38">38</xref>] as follows:</p><p>Dissolution equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula262"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula263"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Large scale Darcy law:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula264"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Boundary conditions are:</p><p>‒ at the north and south boundaries of the domain,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula265"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula266"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>‒ at the east boundary,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula267"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>‒ at the west boundary one imposes, the Dirichlet condition as well for the pressure as for the concentration:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula268"><label>(6’)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula269"><label>(6”)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the above equations, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the large scale mass exchange coefficient and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the relative permeability tensor of the w-phase, function of the NAPL saturation. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the large scale dispersion tensor and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the large scale permeability tensor. The large scale permeability tensor may be calculated in the case of a stratified heterogeneous system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref36">36</xref>] by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula270"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with f<sub>i</sub>, the volume fraction and K<sub>i</sub> the permeability of the i-stratum respectively, I the tensor identity and j the unit vector along the y-axis. The resolution of Equations (1) to (6’’) requires the knowledge of the evolution of the large scale average mass exchange coefficient, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and of large scale average dispersion tensor like that of the elements of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Because of weak variations of saturation, one neglect the dispersion phenomena, one deals with in this work only the closing mass exchange coefficient problems and that of the large scale average relative permeability.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Estimate of the Large Scale Average Effective Properties</title><p>The mass exchange coefficient in the transport equation for the pollutant is a simplified representation of complex pore-scale mechanisms: diffusion of the pollutant at the interface towards the porous media, coupling with convection, and geometrical evolution of the interface due to dissolution. Several works were undertaken to estimate this coefficient ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref39">39</xref>] ) on simple and complex unit cells representative of the pore-scale geometry, and the results obtained lead often to very different estimations. These uncertainties show that the estimate of the mass exchange coefficient remains an open research question. From the Darcy-scale characteristics in a unit cell with two strata (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), we theoretically build the large scale average mass exchange coefficient. We consider two cases: 1) the cases of a unit cell with strata laid out perpendicular to the flow and 2) the case where the flow is parallel to the strata.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Local Equilibrium Hypothesis: Estimate of Large Scale Average Mass Exchange Coefficient</title><p>In previous works ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref38">38</xref>] ) on the NAPL dissolution in stratified porous media, the estimates of the mass exchange coefficient was made for flow perpendicular to the strata presented above in two particular cases: 1) very large Damkh&#246;ler numbers and 2)</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Darcy scale conditions when the dissolution front is in the first stratum</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x21.png"/></fig><p>very small Damkh&#246;ler numbers. In this work, we extend these investigations to the cases of flow parallel to the strata. One presents below the calculation for the Darcy-scale local equilibrium cases. It is supposed here that the porous medium is initially at Darcy-scale local equilibrium in the two strata illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. One injects pure water parallel to the strata. The typical situation is as follows: the velocity of dissolution V<sub>f</sub> is higher in one of the strata. Here one will suppose that the dissolution front is faster in the ω-stratum. If a certain volume of stratum is taken, one has the two following situations described below.</p><p>・ Here we assume that the dissolution front is in the first stratum of the unit cell and there is not yet dissolution in the 2nd stratum. This situation is illustrated by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. We calculate the large scale effective properties and the mass of pollutant contained in the cell in order to estimate the evolution law of the large scale average mass exchange coefficient which controls dissolution in this cases. The large scale effective properties are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula271"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Darcy scale conditions when the dissolution front is in the second stratum</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x23.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Initial conditions in the polluted porous medium with parallel flow with the strata</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x24.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula272"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula273"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula274"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula275"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula276"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula277"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we suppose, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>small enough and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is compatible with the usual data for NAPL contaminants, one can then calculate the mass of NAPL contained in the unit cell</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula278"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The variation of this mass of NAPL in the cell is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula279"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the velocity of the dissolution front in the first stratum. This varia-</p><p>tion of mass is equal to the mass flux of NAPL going out of the unit cell through section A (Cf. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), i.e.:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula280"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the filtration velocity of the liquid phase and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. From (16) and (17), one deduces the velocity of the dissolution front V<sub>f</sub>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula281"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Following the equation of dissolution, one writes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula282"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where v<sub>w</sub> is the volume of the water phase. Combining Equations (17), (18) and (19), one still writes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula283"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>However, the volume of water in the cell is evaluated as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula284"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula285"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In addition, according to (11) and (13) one has</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula286"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Moreover, according to (8) and (13), one can express</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula287"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combination of the relations (13), (23) and (24) in (22) gives finally</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula288"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This correlation is very different from those available in the literature ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref19">19</xref>] ) and is valid for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfying the condition:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula289"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>・ A situation when the dissolution front has left the first stratum and dissolution starts in the second stratum. This second situation is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. We proceed in the same way that previously and calculation of the effective properties gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula290"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula291"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula292"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The mass of NAPL contained in the unit cell, assuming small <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula293"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This mass varies in the cell as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula294"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the velocity of the dissolution front in the 2nd stratum. This varia-</p><p>tion is equal to the mass flux of NAPL going out of the unit cell through section A (Cf. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). From (17) and (31), one deduces velocity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula295"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By the same argument as in the preceding case, one obtains the correlation of mass exchange <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for this situation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula296"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this case, the volume of the water phase can be calculated as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula297"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Moreover,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula298"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula299"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking account Equations (35) and (36), Equation (33) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula300"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This correlation is valid for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfying the condition below:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula301"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Ultimately, one finds the same relations as in 1D [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref29">29</xref>] , and when the medium is homogeneous, i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, one has</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula302"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Local Non Equilibrium Hypothesis for 2D Darcy-Scale Problems: Calculation of the Large Scale Permeabilities</title><p>The problem considered is that to estimate the relative permeabilities during the dissolution of NAPL in a stratified porous medium. The flow, parallel with the strata (Cf. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), is initially at residual oil saturation.</p><p>The coefficient of mass exchange in this case is available in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref38">38</xref>] . We present here an estimate valid for all dimension of the studied system. For very small Damkh&#246;ler numbers, we suppose a certain evolution of saturation at large scale, and we build a large scale average correlation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in following differential form:</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Stratified porous medium</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x71.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula303"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the calculation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is built according to the algorithmic approach below:</p><p>1)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>given at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>2) we impose an increment of average dissolution, i.e.,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>3) we calculate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> using Equation (40);</p><p>4) we calculate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>5) we calculate then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> using Equation (40);</p><p>6) we reiterate by going to the step 1.</p><p>However a scaling of the Darcy law is essential to close Equation (3). The oil phase being trapped, the flow in each stratum is comparable to a monophasic flow, but for the fact that the permeability will change with the evolving oil saturation. The problem is thus identical to that schematized on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. Each stratum is characterized by the permeability tensor K<sub>wω</sub> and K<sub>wη</sub>. The scaling of the problem makes it possible to homogenize the system with the large scale averaging volume V<sub>∞</sub> and to estimate the average large scale<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Neglecting gravity effects, we write as follows the local scale total flow problem:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula304"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula305"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula306"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula307"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula308"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula309"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The scaling of Darcy law for heterogeneous systems is largely developed by Quintard et al., ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref41">41</xref>] ) and this is known to lead to a large-scale Darcy’s law, which we write as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula310"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are respectively the large-scale filtration velocity and pressure of the water phase and the large-scale permeability tensor of the water phase may be written under the form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref38">38</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula311"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In which <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the average permeability tensor at large scale and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the matrix of the relative permeabilities at large scale whose elements depend on saturation.</p><p>Initially the stratified system satisfies the conditions of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. By adopting the assumption of small Damkh&#246;ler numbers, we calculate using the algorithm deduced from approximation (40) rewritten below, the effective properties such as the relative permeabilities and the large scale mass exchange coefficient.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula312"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We present in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the iterative step of calculation which we use in the numerical model.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the large-scale oil saturation, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are respectively oil saturations in the stratum ω and in the stratum η for this large-scale oil saturation α<sub>ω</sub> and α<sub>ω</sub><sub>η</sub> the corresponding values of the mass exchange coefficients in the stratum ω and in the stratum η respectively, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>the large scale mass exchange coefficient calculated with approximation of the system of equations 50, k<sub>rwω</sub> and k<sub>rwη</sub> the relative permeabilities of water in each stratum, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>the large scale average permeability of water for the domains ω and η, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the large-scale water relative permeability and f<sub>ω</sub> and f<sub>η</sub> are the domain volume fractions such as f<sub>ω</sub> + f<sub>η</sub> = 1 with f<sub>ω</sub> = V<sub>ω</sub>/V<sub>∞</sub> and f<sub>η</sub> = V<sub>η</sub>/V<sub>∞</sub>.</p><p>For a flow which is parallel to the strata, all these characteristics are calculated for the second iteration by the formulas below.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula313"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Iterative step for calculation of large scale average characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iter. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iter. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Cf. system of Equations (50)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >…</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the average permeability of the stratified medium (here the flow is parallel to the strata). Iteration 1 corresponds to the initial conditions in the two strata. We continue the iterations by going each time at the step 1 as indicated by the algorithmic approach above used for the calculation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Equation (40).</p><p>Thus, in a more general way, if one gives oneself a certain evolution at local Darcy scale of saturation at large scale, of saturation in each stratum, of the coefficient of exchange in each stratum, of the average exchange coefficient at large scale and of the relative permeability of Corey type, all the relations (50) can be evaluated at the time step n + 1. The relative permeability and the large scale mass exchange coefficient are respectively estimated by the following expressions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula314"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula315"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Moreover, the relative permeabilities at large scale depend on saturation according to Equation (51). In conclusion in this paragraph, it is interesting to stress that the correlations on the large scale mass exchange coefficient obtained in this study differ from the traditional correlations of mass transfer available in literature ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref19">19</xref>] ), even for the large scale systems, and who generally take the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula316"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where n &lt; 1 and 0.6 ≤ m ≤ 0.9.</p><p>Indeed, the correlations (25) (37) and Equation (40) are very different from the correlation (53).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Experiments</title><p>With these estimates of the effective properties, the large-scale equations of dissolution are now under a closed form, i.e., purely expressed in terms of large-scale variables. They are solved numerically in this section for the particular situations considered in this work. A comparison is made between Darcy-scale and large-scale results in order to validate the proposed models. The calculations were carried out using a proprietary program DISSOL 2D conceived for this study and based on a classical finite volume formulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref38">38</xref>] . The flow is parallel to the strata. The numerical results relate the two theoretical situations analyzed in this work, namely: 1) assumption of local equilibrium at Darcy scale; 2) assumption of local non equilibrium at Darcy scale.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Calculations for Darcy-Scale Local Equilibrium</title><p>The numerical experiments were carried out using the mass exchange coefficient of the relations (25) and (37). This coefficient corresponds to the dissolution of a NAPL in a stratified system characterized by a unit cell including two strata and having each one, a rather large mass exchange coefficient so that the dissolution front is sharp and characteristic of a local equilibrium dissolution. Simulations at the two scales were carried out with the data of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>・ Concentration fields at large scale</p><p>Water injection at x = 0, under an entry pressure of Pe = 10<sup>5</sup> Pa in the direction of the flow (the pressure at the exit of the domain is taken to be zero), starts the dissolution phenomenon. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> illustrate the large-scale averaged concentration fields (in mass fraction) obtained at various times. One observes that:</p><p>‒ the zone of dissolution increases with time. In the interior of this zone which separates pure water from polluted water, the concentrations are lower than the equilibrium concentration;</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Concentration fiels <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (in mass fraction) at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> days and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x130.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Data at Darcy-scale and at large-scale for the 2D simulations carried out with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> estimated with local equilibrium at the Darcy scale</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Darcy scale parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Large scale parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Physical properties of the phases</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Porosity/stratum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residual saturation/stratum strate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exchange coefficient/stratum (s<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coefficient of permeability/stratum (m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average porosity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial average saturation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average permeability (m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>‒ the concentration at the downstream of this zone remains equal to the equilibrium concentration. Moreover, water with weak concentration in pollutant advances in front of the dissolution front in the strata removed from pollutant in order to contribute to decrease the concentration of pollutant in water polluted in the downstream;</p><p>‒ the process is very long.</p><p>・ Large scale saturation fields</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> illustrate the averaged saturation fields obtained at various times. The pressure of entry is one bar and that of exit considered null. One notices in the case of the saturation fields the same behaviors as for the concentration fields. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> illustrate the evolutions 2D of the average fields and those at Darcy-scale respectively of the concentration (in mass fraction) and of saturation at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. One notes that the fields at Darcy scale have a very complex spatial evolution certainly due to local heterogeneities strongly present at this scale. In addition, these figures show that the averaged fields obtained from a local equilibrium situation at Darcy scale, are characteristic of a local non equilibrium situation.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Calculations for Darcy-Scale Local Non-Equilibrium</title><p>In this paragraph, we presents the results of the 2D calculations carried out by supposing that the Damkh&#246;ler numbers are very small; i.e., the mass exchange coefficient used is that developed in paragraph 3.2. The modeled situation corresponds to the dissolution of NAPLs in a stratified porous medium (Cf. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The flow is parallel to the strata. In each stratum, dissolution is controlled by a rather small mass exchange coefficient so that the dissolution fronts are of local non-equilibrium type at Darcy scale. Simulations were carried out with the data of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The experiments carried out made it possible to highlight the evolution following the</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Saturation fields <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> days and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x150.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Evolution of the averaged concentration fields (in mass fraction) and those at Darcy scale at t = 5・10<sup>7</sup> s</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x154.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Evolution of the averaged saturation fields (in mass fraction) and those at Darcy scale at t = 5・10<sup>7</sup> s</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x155.png"/></fig><p>average saturation of mass exchange coefficients in each stratum and that at large scale and relative permeabilities.</p><p>・ Evolution of mass exchange coefficients</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 illustrates the evolution of the mass exchange coefficients simulated using the algorithm presented in section 3.2. For the chosen data, one notes that the curves of the exchange coefficients as a function of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> pass by the same point</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Above this point, the transfer coefficient is faster in the stratum ω more permeable to water. While below this point, the transfer coefficient</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Data at Darcy scale and large scale for the simulations carried out by applying the hypothesis of local non equilibrium at Darcy scale</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Darcy scale parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Large scale parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Physical properties of the phases</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Porosity/stratum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residual saturation/stratum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exchange coef./stratum (s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coefficient of permeability/stratum (m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average porosity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial average saturation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average permeability (m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Evolution of the mass exchange coefficients as a function of large-scale saturation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x175.png"/></fig><p>is higher in the stratum η least permeable. This situation explains certainly the difficulties of starting of dissolution due to the importance of heterogeneities of the medium.</p><p>・ Evolution of large scale relative permeabilities</p><p>We illustrate in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 the evolution of the relative permeabilities to water at the two scales. It is represented on this figure, the relative permeabilities to water for each stratum k<sub>rwω</sub> and k<sub>rw</sub> and the large scale relative permeability<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In addition, the large scale permeability is near the permeability of the most permeable medium.</p><p>・ Effects of heterogeneities on the large-scale effective properties</p><p>A fine analysis of the effects of heterogeneities of the medium on the large-scale effective properties is essential. Indeed, in the case being studied, NAPL mass flux are controlled at the same time by the differential distribution of the residual pollutant in the medium and by the heterogeneity.</p><p>The essential effective properties that we established in this study to model NAPL dissolution in heterogeneous systems are the large-scale mass transfer coefficient and the large-scale effective permeability (Cf. Equations and system of Equations (25), (37), (40), (51) and (52)). We examine in this paragraph, how the heterogeneities of the medium influence these parameters.</p><p>‒ Effects of heterogeneities on the large-scale relative permeabilities</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 represents the evolutions of the large scale relative permeabilities as a function of saturation for various values of the ω-region volume fraction</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and the same porosity (Cf. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). This figure shows that the relative permeability is more significant at the end of the dissolution in the medium containing less pollutant, whereas at the beginning of dissolution, it is rather</p><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Evolution of the relative permeabilities as a function of large-scale saturation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x179.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Evolution of the large scale relative permeabilities as a function of saturation for different volume fractions of the stratified porous medium</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x180.png"/></fig><p>the medium containing more NAPL which is more permeable with water.</p><p>‒ Effects of heterogeneities on the large-scale mass transfer coefficients</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3 illustrates the evolution of the mass exchange coefficients as a function of the oil saturation, for various values of the ω-region volume fraction, simulated using the algorithm described in Section 3.2. It is observed that the mass exchange coefficient increases with average saturation.</p><p>The transfer is more significant when the volume fraction of the stratum ω increases, this means increase of mass of pollutant according to the data of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. This result confirms those obtained previously in the case of the “local equilibrium” assumption for the flows perpendicular to the strata ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref38">38</xref>] ), although the correlations of the mass exchange coefficients used for each case are very different. In addition, these mass exchange coefficients grow in both cases with average saturation for the three volume fractions of region considered.</p><p>As in the former studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73071-ref38">38</xref>] , one notices that the mass transfer during the dissolution of NAPL in heterogeneous porous medium is amongst other things controlled by:</p><p>‒ quantity of residual pollutant contained in poral space;</p><p>‒ installation of this pollutant in the porous medium, certainly marked by the influence of heterogeneities or hydrodynamic instabilities.</p><fig id="fig13"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> Evolution of the large scale mass exchange coefficient as a function of saturation for different volume fractions of the stratified porous medium</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x181.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Data of the experiments for the evolution of the large scale mass exchangecoefficient on the assumption of local non equilibrium</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >f<sub>ω</sub> = 0.3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >f<sub>ω</sub> = 0.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >f<sub>ω</sub> = 0.7</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>ω</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>η</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>or</sub><sub>ω</sub> =S<sub>or1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>or</sub><sub>η</sub> =S<sub>or2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total mass of NAPL in the unit cell: M<sub>NAPL</sub>/unit volume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0470 &#215; ρ<sub>o</sub>C<sub>oeq</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0784 &#215; ρ<sub>o</sub>C<sub>oeq</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1098 &#215; ρ<sub>o</sub>C<sub>oeq</sub></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>In this paper we have proposed a large-scale model describing NAPL dissolution for stratified heterogeneous systems.</p><p>Two limit dissolution cases were studied: a local equilibrium case and a local non- equilibrium case. Both situations lead to a large-scale model of local non-equilibrium type. The construction of the large-scale effective parameters in the local equilibrium case is specific of flows parallel to a stratified system. While the results for the local non-equilibrium case is not specific to 2D or 3D systems, nor a given type of hetero- geneity, our application was also presented for flows parallel to a stratified system.</p><p>The proposed models have been validated by a comparison of the results of direct Darcy-scale simulations to homogenized simulations. Our results confirm the interest of using local non-equilibrium models for large-scale simulations of contaminated aquifers. In addition, the correlations for the obtained large-scale effective parameters, at least for the 2D stratified systems investigated here, are rather different from most of the correlations suggested by laboratory experiments at, therefore, a small scale. This should be taken into account when designing large-scale models for practical situations.</p><p>In perspective, it would be interesting to carry out 2D/3D calculations for more complex heterogeneous media such as nodular media. We believe the results for small Da numbers can be extended in a straightforward manner. However, it must be understood that our results for the case of large Da numbers, i.e., sharp fronts propagating through the system, cannot be in principle extended to more general heterogeneities.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mabiala, B., Nsongo, T., Tomodiatounga, D.N., Tathy, C. and Nganga, D. (2017) Two-Dimensional Modeling of the NAPL Dissolution in Porous Media: Heterogeneities Effects on the Large Scale Permeabilities and Mass Exchange Co- efficient. Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, 6, 56-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cweee.2017.61005</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Nomenclatures</title><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>averaged mass fraction of o-species in the w-phase <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>equilibrium mass fraction of the pollutant species at the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> interface.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>deviation of averaged concentration.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>dispersion tensor.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>dispersion tensor for the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-phase <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>large dispersion tensor.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>saturation of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x194.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-phase.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x195.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>deviation of averaged saturation.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>NAPL residual saturation.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>total mass of NAPL in the unit cell.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>average filtration velocity of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-phase, a vector<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>average interstitial velocity of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-phase, a vector<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x203.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x204.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>deviation of averaged velocity.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>dissolution front velocity in i-region<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>cell P&#233;clet number.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Damkh&#246;ler number.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>unit cell length.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x210.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>length of i-stratum<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x210.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x212.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>volume of liquid phase in the unit cell.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>unit cell volume.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x214.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>averaging volume.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>position vector locating the centroid of the averaging volume.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>permeability tensor [L2].</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>relative permeability of i-stratum<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>large scale relative permeability of i-stratum<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x221.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>permeability of i-stratum<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x221.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x222.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x223.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>position vector locating points in one phase relative to the centroid of the averaging.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x224.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>unit normal vector directed from the l-phase to the o-phase.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x225.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>area of the unit cell sectioned in the flow direction.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Length of the test porous medium.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>position of dissolution front.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x228.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>position of dissolution front in i-stratum.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Greek Letters</title><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x229.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>mass exchange coefficient <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x229.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x230.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x231.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>porosity of the porous medium <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x231.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x232.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> density of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x231.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x232.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-phase <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x231.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x232.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>viscosity of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x236.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-phase <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x236.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>volume fraction of i-region <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Subscripts</title><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x240.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>liquid, NAPL, solid phases</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x241.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>water, oil species</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x242.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>refers to strata</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x243.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>residual saturation</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Superscript</title><p>*refers to large-scale properties</p><disp-formula id="scirp.73071-formula317"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2570131x244.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Submit or recommend next manuscript to SCIRP and we will provide best service for you:</p><p>Accepting pre-submission inquiries through Email, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, etc.</p><p>A wide selection of journals (inclusive of 9 subjects, more than 200 journals)</p><p>Providing 24-hour high-quality service</p><p>User-friendly online submission system</p><p>Fair and swift peer-review system</p><p>Efficient typesetting and proofreading procedure</p><p>Display of the result of downloads and visits, as well as the number of cited articles</p><p>Maximum dissemination of your research work</p><p>Submit your manuscript at: http://papersubmission.scirp.org/</p><p>Or contact cweee@scirp.org</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.73071-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fried, J.J., Muntzer, P. and Zilliox, L. (1979) Groundwater Pollution by Transfer of Oil Hydrocarbons. Ground Water, 17, 586-594.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1979.tb03359.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, C.T., Poirier-McNeill, M.M. and Mayer, A.S. (1990) Dissolution of Trapped Nonaqueous Phase Liquids: Mass Transfer Characteristics. Water Resources Research, 26, 2783-2796. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i011p02783</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parker, J.C., Katyal, A.K., Kaluarachchi, J.J., Lenhard, R.J., Johnson, T.J., Jayaraman, K., et al. (1991) Modelling Multiphase Organic Chemical Transport in Soils and Ground Water. Technical Report.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Powers, S.E., Loureiro, C.O., Abriola, L.M. and Weber, W.J.J. (1991) Theoretical Study of the Significance of Nonequilibrium Dissolution of Nonaqueous Phase Liquids in Subsurface Systems. Water Resources Research, 27, 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR00074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Come, J.-M. (1996) Expérimentation et modélisation des procédés in situ de dépollution par biodégradation aérobie des aquifères contaminés par des hydrocarbures. Prise en compte d’une phase résiduelle en huile. Th. Doctorat, Ecole des Mines de Paris. Mémoires des Sciences de la Terre de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris n 29, 311 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaskassian, S., Ropars, M., Haeseler, F., Come, J.M. and Quintard, M. (2004) Thèmes 2 et 3. Reconnaissances de phase 2, site contaminé par des OHV. Rapport d’avancement Programme ADEME/MACAOH, 73 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mercer, J.W. and Cohen, R.M. (1990) A Review of Immiscible Fluids in the Subsurface: Properties, Models, Characterization and Remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 6, 107-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(90)90043-G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, C.T., Christakos, G., Imhoff, P.T., McBride, J.F., Pedit, J.A. and Trangenstein, J.A. (1998) Multiphase Flow and Transport Modeling in Heterogeneous Porous Media: Challenges and Approaches. Advances in Water Resources, 21, 77-120.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00036-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, C.T. and Mayer, A.S. (1996) The Influence of Mass Transfer Characteristics and Porous Media Heterogeneity on Nonaqueous Phase Dissolution. Water Resources Research, 32, 1919-1928.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Radilla, Z.G. (1997) Contamination des eaux souterraines par les hydrocarbures: expériences en laboratoire, modélisation, interprétation et résolution des problèmes inverses pour l’estimation des propriétés de transport. Th. Doctorat, ENSAM Bordeaux, 210 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borden, R.C. and Kao, C.M. (1992) Evaluation of Groundwater Extraction for Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Groundwater. Water Environment Research, 64, 28-36.  
https://doi.org/10.2175/WER.64.1.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geller, J.T. (1990) Dissolution of Non-Aqueous Phase Organic Liquids in Porous Media. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hunt, J.R, Sitar, N. and Udell, K.S. (1988) Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Transport and Cleanup: 1, Analysis of Mechanisms. Water Resources Research, 24, 1247-1258.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i008p01247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Imhoff, P.T., Jaffe R. and Pinder, G.F. (1990) Dissolution of Organic Liquids in Groundwater. Paper Presented at Specialty Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers, Arlington.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Razakarisasoa, O., Rasolofoniaina, J.D., Munster, P. and Zilliox, L. (1989) Selective Dissolution and Transport of Hydrocarbons in an Alluvial Aquifer: Role and Impact of Residual Air on Ground Water Contamination. In: Kobus, H.E. and Kinzelbach, W., Eds., Contaminant Transport in Groundwater, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S. (1994) Convection, Dispersion, and Interfacial Transport of Contaminants: Homogeneous Porous Media. Advances in Water Resources, 17, 221-239.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(94)90002-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Illangasekare, T.H., Armbruster, E.J. and Yates, D.N. (1995) Non-Aqueous Phase Fluids in Heterogeneous Aquifers: An Experimental Study. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 121, 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1995)121:8(571)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Illangasekare, T.H., Ramsey, J.L., Jensen, K.H. and Butts, M. (1995) Experimental Study of Movement and Distribution of Dense Organic Contaminants in Heterogeneous Aquifers: An Experimental Study. Journal of Cotaminant Hydrology, 20, 1-25.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(95)00045-w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayer, A.S. and Miller, C.T. (1996) The Influence of Mass Transfer Characteristics and Porous Media Heterogeneity on Nonaqueous Phase Dissolution. Water Resources Research, 32, 1551-1561.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowry, M.I. and Miller, C.T. (1994) Pore-Scale Modelling of Nonwetting-Phase Residual in Porous Media. Center for Multiphase Research News, 1, 7-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowry, M.I. and Miller, C.T. (1995) Pore-Scale Modeling of Nonwetting-Phase Residual in Porous Media. Water Resources Research, 31, 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02849</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Powers, S.E., Abriola, L.M. and Weber, W.J.J. (1992) An Experimental Investigation of Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Dissolution in Saturated Subsurface Systems: Steady State Mass Transfer Rates. Water Resources Research, 28, 2691-2705.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00984</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, C., Hongkyu, Y., Werth, C.J., Valocchi, A.J., Basu, N.B. and Jawitz, J.W. (2008) Evaluation of Simplified Mass Transfer Models to Simulate the Impacts of Source Zone Architecture on Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Dissolution in Heterogeneous Porous Media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 102, 49-60.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.05.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Come, J.M., Burghoffer, P., Danquigny, C., Emoney-Gauthier, A., Getto, D., Haeseler, F., Kaskassian, S., Le Roux, F., Quintard, M., Razakarisoa, O. and Schaefer, G. (2005) CIDISIR, Quantification des cinétiques de dissolution sur sites réels—Hydrocarbures pétroliers et dérivés halogénés, Guide méthodologique. Programme RITEAU/Ministère de la recherche, 72 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayer, A. and Endres, K.L. (2007) Simultaneous Optimization of Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Source and Contaminant Plume Remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 91, 288-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.11.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saenton, S., Illangasekare, T.H., Soga, K. and Saba, T.A. (2002) Effects of Source Zone Heterogeneity on Surfactant-Enhanced NAPL Dissolution and Resulting Remediation End-Points. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 59, 27-44.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00074-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soga, K., Page, J.W.E. and Illangasekare, T.H. (2004) A Review of NAPL Source Zone Remediation Efficiency and the Mass Flux Approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 110 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mabiala, B., Tathy, C. and Quintard M. (2003) Napl Dissolution in Heterogeneous Systems: Large-Scale Analysis for Stratified System. 2nd International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Victoria Falls.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mabiala, B., Tathy, C. and Quintard, M. (2004) Dissolution d’une phase polluante hydrocarbonée en milieu poreux hétérogène. URED, revue pluridisciplinaire de l’U.G.B de St-Louis du Sénégal, 10, 23-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yra, A. (2006) Dispersion active en milieux poreux hétérogènes contaminés par des produits hydrocarbonés. Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université de Bordeaux I, 123 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mabiala, B., Tathy, C., Nganga, D. and Bouka, U.F. (2010) NAPL Dissolution in a Three Stratified Porous Media: Large Scale Effectives Properties. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5, 435-446. https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2010.435.446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ahmadi, A. and Quintard, M. (2000) Upscaling NAPL Transport: Direct Calculation of Local Properties on a Network. In: Ibarra-Berastegui, G., Brebbia, C.A. and Zannetti, P., Eds., Development and Application of Computer Techniques to Environmental Studies WIT Press, Boston, 205-214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aigueperse, A. (1998) Dispersion dans un aquifère contaminé par un hydrocarbure. Doctorat de l’Université de Bordeaux I—décembre 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coutelieris, F.A., Kainourgiakis, M.E., Stubos, A.K., Kikkinides, E.S. and Yortsos, Y.C. (2006) Multiphase Mass Transport with Partitioning and Inter-Phase Transport in Porous Media. Chemical Engineering Science, 61, 4650-4661.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.02.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintard, M., Bletzacker, L., Chenu, D. and Whitaker S. (2006) Nonlinear, Multicomponent, Mass Transport in Porous Media. Chemical Engineering Science, 61, 2643-2669.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.11.034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S. (1988) Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media: The Method of Large-Scale Averaging. Transport in Porous Media, 3, 357-413.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00233177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S. (1993) Transport in Ordered and Disordered Porous Media: Volume Averaged Equations, Closure Problems, and Comparison with Experiment. Chemical Engineering Science, 48, 2537-2564.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(93)80266-S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mabiala, B. (2009) Modélisation des pollutions des sols par des composés hydrocarbonés: Effets des hétérogénéités sur la dissolution. PhD de l’Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville Congo—160 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Aigueperse, A. and Quintard, M. (1994) Macroscopic Models for Active Dispersion in Aquifers Contaminated by Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids. In: Zanetti, P., Ed., Computer Techniques in Environmental Studies V Vol. 1: Pollution Modelling, Computational Mechanics Publications, Boston, 157-164.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S. (1987) Ecoulement monophasique en milieu poreux: Effet des hétérogénéités locales. Journal de Mécanique théorique appliquée, 6, 691-726.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73071-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Quintard, M. and Whitaker, S. (1999) Fundamentals of Transport Equation Formulation for Two-Phase Flow in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Porous Media. In: Parlange, M.B. and Hopmans, J.W., Eds., Vadose Zone Hydrology: Cutting across Disciplines, Oxford University Press, New York, 3-57.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>