<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2016.613105</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-73009</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Feto-Maternal Outcome and Complications of Emergency Caesarean Section among the Patients Admitted at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka City
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rifat</surname><given-names>Sultana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aftabun</surname><given-names>Nahar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fatema</surname><given-names>Mahbooba Akter</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rabeya</surname><given-names>Sultana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Afroza</surname><given-names>Ghani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Abdullah Yusuf</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Gynaecology &amp;amp; Obstetrics, Shaheed Taj Uddin Ahmad Medical College, Gajipur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Gynaecology &amp;amp; Obstetrics, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Gynaecology &amp;amp; Obstetrics, City Medical College, Gazipur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Gynaecology &amp;amp; Obstetrics, Mugda Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Neurosciences &amp;amp; Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>dr.rifat.sultana@gmail.com(RS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>13</issue><fpage>874</fpage><lpage>878</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>23,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Caesarean Section done in emergency basis can result some adverse outcome to both the fetus &amp; mother &amp; complications may arise. 
  Objective: The purpose of the present study was to see the fetal &amp; maternal outcome or any complications among the pregnant woman who had undergone emergency caesarean section. 
  Methodology: This descriptive type of cross sectional study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecology &amp; Obstetrics at Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the period from July 2006 to December 2006. The patients underwent emergency caesarean section for any indication during the mentioned period of study was selected as study population. Among them, 100 cases were recruited in this study. 
  Result: Among the cases, maternal morbidity was as high as 64% which were due to haemorrhage, post-operative infection, rise of blood pressure and other complications. Regarding fetal outcome, 92% babies were born with normal birth weight, 33% babies were developed complications which were mostly due to birth asphyxia and prematurity. 
  Conclusion: In conclusion, emergency caesarean section has maternal morbidity as well as fetal and neonatal adverse outcome.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Foetal Outcome</kwd><kwd> Neonatal Outcome</kwd><kwd> Maternal Outcome</kwd><kwd> Emergency Caesarean Section</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Child birth is a universally celebrated event, yet many thousands of women each day, child birth is experienced not as the joyful event it should be [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref1">1</xref>] . Pregnancy and parturition should be regarded as a natural and physiological event; however it may be pathological any time before, during and after delivery.</p><p>Globally every year about 500,000 maternal deaths and 5 - 6 million perinatal deaths occur and 99% of them are in the developing world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref3">3</xref>] . The safe motherhood initiative is a global effort to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity and to achieve a healthy baby by proper management of obstetrical problems. Caesarean section is the most frequently performed major operation in obstetrics and plays an important role in this respect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref4">4</xref>] . Modern obstetric care includes liberalized use of caesarean section and it steadily increases in the past 20 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref1">1</xref>] . In emergency situation, caesarean section is done due to unforeseen complication arising either during pregnancy or during labour; this acts as a life saving measure for both the mother and fetus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref3">3</xref>] . Every operative procedure has its own hazards; thus, caesarean section is also not free from them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref2">2</xref>] . In Bangladesh, the obstetrics care has improved; however, this is not optimal to reduce the maternal mortality and morbidity. During delivery the fetal outcome is also important. Though the rate of fetal mortality and morbidity has been improved the overall scenario of emergency caesarian section is not evaluated. In this regards, it is indispensable to know the situation of feto-maternal morbidity and mortality in Bangladesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref5">5</xref>] . Therefore, the present study was undertaken to observe the maternal and fetal outcome among the pregnant women who had undergone emergency caesarean section.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>This descriptive type of cross sectional study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka the busiest tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh, during the period from July 2006 to December 2006 for a period of six (06) months. The patients underwent emergency caesarean section for any indication during the mentioned period of study was selected as study population. The cases were selected by random sampling from the patients with an indication of emergency caesarean section but with stable general condition at that moment. Every 10th patient was selected for the study. Data were collected after taking written consent from the properly selected patients. At first, thorough history as per prepared questionnaire, then clinical examination was done and information was collected. Intraoperative complications were noted. With follow up monitoring, post-operative complications were observed. Foetal outcome were noted. All relevant clinical information of the cases was recorded systematically in the predesigned clinical data sheet. Data were checked, verified and complied by computer; analysis was done by using SPSS and the results were displayed in tables.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>A total number of 100 emergency caesarian section cases were recruited for this study after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the study population post- operative complication was reported in 64 (64.0%) cases and the rest 36 (36.0%) cases were without any complications (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Among the 64 maternal complications the most common reported condition was per-operative haemorrhage which was 20 (31.3%) followed by wound infection and UTI which were 18 (28.1%) cases and 9 (14.1%) cases respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows that most of the babies (92%) were born with normal (2.5 kg to 3.5 kg) birth weight (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows that foetal complication occurred in 33.0% cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Among 33 fetal outcomes with complication the most common complication was Birth asphyxia which was 8 (24.2%) cases followed by prematurity, neonatal infection and neonatal jaundice which were 7 (21.2%) cases, 6 (18.2%) cases and 5 (15.1%) cases respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This study was designed to evaluate the maternal and foetal outcome in emergency</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Post-operative maternal complications</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conditions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Maternal outcome found among the study population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conditions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Haemorrhage*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wound infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Puerperal Pyrexia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >UTI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anaemia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Headache</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cardiac arrest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-operative rise of BP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Both Per-operative and PPH (Primary &amp; Secondary).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Outcome of baby according to birth weight</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;2.5 kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 kg - 3.5 kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Post-operative fetal complications</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conditions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Foetal outcome found among the study population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conditions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal Jaundice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prematurity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal Infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth asphyxia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital anomaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neonatal death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>caesarean section. Several similar types of studies were undertaken in Bangladesh by different researchers to reduce the incidence &amp; complication of emergency caesarean section and to achieve a healthy mother and a healthy baby by proper management of obstetrical problems.</p><p>This study reveals that majority (64%) cases developed complication. Among the complications, haemorrage was 20.0%, which occurred from surgical incision and atony of the uterus &amp; were managed appropriately. Other complications were wound infection 18.0%, anaemia 3.0%, puerperal pyrexia 4.0%, UTI 9.0%, headache 5.0%, post- operative rise of BP 4.0%, one case developed cardiac arrest due to anaesthetic complication. Complications like wound infection, febrile morbidity and endometritis were found more in case of preoperative rupture of membranes prolong duration of labour &amp; repeated per vaginal examination. In a study conducted by Chowdhury et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref6">6</xref>] at SSMC &amp; Mitford Hospital, incidence of wound sepsis was 18.28%, anaemia 7.1%, which were higher than this study. Another study was carried out by Begum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref7">7</xref>] in 300 cases among the admitted patients of Dhaka Medical College Hospital &amp; found that wound infection 35.5% which is also higher than this study. This study can also be compared with other studies which were undertaken in abroad. A study by Watson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref8">8</xref>] has got wound infection in only 1.54% cases UTI in 4.64% after emergency caesarean section which is much less than my study.</p><p>In this study, foetal outcome of emergency caesarean section was not good. Here 33% of the babies developed complications and 67% were healthy. Among the complications, 5% developed jaundice, 7% were premature baby delivered due to maternal morbidity, 6% developed neonatal infection, 8% developed birth asphyxia, 2% were neonatal death and perinatal death were 4%. These findings are far better than that of Tedesse et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref9">9</xref>] at Ethopia in which stillbirth was 4.8% and neonatal death were 4.7%. How- ever, findings of this study were higher than Dey and Hatai [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.73009-ref10">10</xref>] at Calcutta. They found that neonatal complications were 21.8% in emergency caesarean section and 15.5% in elective caesarean section.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Caesarean section, a major surgical procedure for obstetrical management, however, it still has got some morbidity and mortality for the mother and baby. So, it is necessary to take consideration of all the points related to emergency caesarean section along with the factors responsible for emergency caesarean section and outcome of this should be studied much more. Thereby the incidence and complications can be reduced.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sultana, R., Nahar, A., Akter, F.M., Sultana, R., Ghani, A. and Yusuf, Md.A. (2016) Feto-Maternal Outcome and Complications of Emergency Caesarean Section among the Patients Admitted at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka City. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 874- 878. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2016.613105</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.73009-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Royson, E. and Armstrong, F. (1989) Preventing Maternal Deaths. World Health Organization, Geneva, 9-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ratnum, S.S., Rao, K.B. and Arulkumarans, S. (1992) Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology for Postgraduates. 2nd Edition, Orient Longman, Hyderabad, 10-14, 145-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azim, A.K.M.A., Salauddin, G. and Bari, M.A. (2000) A Study of MCH Service among the Slum Dwellers of Dhaka City. Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology, 20, 10-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nahar, K. and Nahar, N. (2005) Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomy-65 Cases. Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology, 20, 47-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. Annex 2, Division of Family Planning. WHO/FHE/MSM/94; 11: 95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chowdhury, S.B., Newaz, R., Begum, A. and Dewan, F. (1994) Indications and Complications of Caesarean Section—A Study of 1083 Cases. Bangladesh Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology, 9, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Begum</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1990</year>)<article-title>Post Caesarean Wound Infection—An Analysis of Prevalence and Predisposing Factors</article-title><source> Bangladesh Medical Journal</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 3</fpage>-<lpage>7</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watson, W.J., George, R.J., Welter, S. and Day, D. (1997) High-Risk Obstetric Patients. Maternal Morbidity after Cesareans. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 42, 267-270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tedesse, E., Adane, M. and Abiyou, M. (1999) Caesarean Section Deliveries at Tikur Anbessa Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia. East African Medical Journal, 73, 619-622.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.73009-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dey, N. and Hatai, S.K. (1992) A Study of Caesarean Section Cases with Special References to Maternal and Neonatal Outcome. Journal of Indian Medical Association, 90, 149-151.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>