<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2016.718187</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-72929</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Within-Host Model of Dengue Infection with a Non-Constant Monocyte Production Rate
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jeremy</surname><given-names>J. Thibodeaux</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>Hennessey</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematical Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematical Sciences, Loyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>18</issue><fpage>2382</fpage><lpage>2393</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>19,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper we modify previous models to develop a new model of within-host dengue infection without the assumption that monocyte production is constant. We show that this new model exhibits behavior not seen in previous models. We then proceed by obtaining an expression for the net reproductive rate of the virus and thus establish a stability result. We also perform a sensitivity analysis to test various treatment strategies and find that two strategies might be fruitful. One is the reduction of the infection rate of monocytes by viruses and the other, more effective, theoretical approach is to reduce the number of new viruses per infected monocyte.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dengue</kwd><kwd> Within-Host Model</kwd><kwd> Net Reproductive Rate</kwd><kwd> Treatment Scenarios</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dengue is a virus belonging to the Flavivirus genus. The Flavivirus genus includes mostly mosquito-borne viruses such as the West Nile virus and the yellow fever virus. The dengue virus exists in four different serotypes. A serotype is a distinct variation within a species of viruses that may present a different configuration or slightly different kind of antigen. All serotypes of the dengue virus can cause the full spectrum of disease symptoms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The World Health Organization estimates that nearly 50 million infections occur annually in over 100 countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref2">2</xref>] . As there are no specific anti-viral treatments for dengue infection, supportive care is the usual treatment. This may include bed rest, antipyretics and analgesics. A small subset of infections result in dengue hemorrhagic fever which can be fatal.</p><p>The incubation period of the virus in an infected host ranges from 5 to 10 days [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref3">3</xref>] . At the end of the incubation period, viral particles enter the bloodstream and cause the onset of symptomatic fever. Viremia, the presence of virus in the blood stream, occurs roughly two days before the onset of symptoms and lasts 5 to 6 days [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref4">4</xref>] . Viremia tends to peak at the time of or shortly after the onset of illness. The clearance of virus is performed by the immune system.</p><p>There have been many mathematical studies of dengue infection. Of those, relatively few [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref9">9</xref>] are concerned with within-host dynamics. In these, it is assumed that the production of target cells is constant. This assumption is adequate in healthy individuals but the production of monocytes can vary, especially during infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] . In fact, the data in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] show that monocyte levels are actually elevated during dengue infection, which is rather counter-intuitive. In general, the production is controlled by the Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF). We account for this additional aspect in our model and show that this modification allows for better agreement with the data.</p><p>The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we formulate the homogeneous viral infection model. Section 3 is the analysis of the model’s equilibria. Section 4 contains the parameter sensitivity analysis and comparisons with previous models. In Section 5 we make some concluding remarks.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Model</title><p>Within this section, we formulate a model of population growth of the dengue virus within the human body based on the model in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref9">9</xref>] . The model starts with the beginning of the detectable viremia period. It is assumed that one serotype of dengue virus circulates within the infected host and that the virus infects the monocyte cell population of the host.</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref9">9</xref>] , the authors studied the following model:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula172"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represent the density of susceptible monocytes, infected monocytes, free virus particles and immune cells in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> blood at time<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively. The production of susceptible monocytes is assumed to be a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and they also have a constant death rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This model always shows that monocyte population significantly decreases during infection, which is not always the case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] . In order to obtain a model that more closely resembles the data in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] , we have chosen to model the production of monocytes dynamically. First, we account for the fact that the primary catalyst for monocyte production is a cytokine called the Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF). Other components of the blood are also controlled in a similar way. For example, the production of erythrocytes is controlled by the hormone erythropoietin. In several previous works, including [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref13">13</xref>] , it was assumed that the rate of production was proportional to the hormone concentration. We will make the same assumption here and will require that in the absence of infection, the rate of production is indeed the constant<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This changes the first equation in (1) to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula173"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the normal concentration of M-CSF. We are now required to model the dynamics of the M-CSF production. First, we will model how the body regulates its control under normal conditions, i.e., no infection. In this case, the production’s purpose is to maintain a normal monocyte count [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref14">14</xref>] , which we will call<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We want a function that increases when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and decreases when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> To achieve this, we</p><p>have chosen the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>It is also known that M-CSF production increases as a result of susceptible cells being infected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref16">16</xref>] . Therefore, we will assume that the rate of increased production is proportional to the rate of infection,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus we will have the term<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the constant of proportionality. Finally, M-CSF has a natural decay rate which we will call <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> This results in the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula174"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The infection of susceptible monocytes depends on the successful invasion rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of virus into susceptible cells per unit time. The infection period of infected monocytes</p><p>is assumed constant as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Upon infected cell death, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>free virus particles are released into the blood. The free virus particles are assumed to be cleared at a rate of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It is assumed that the immune cells are produced at a constant rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and they have a lifespan of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Additionally, we assume immune cell production is stimulated by the</p><p>current level of infection <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at a constant rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, as well as from contacts with infected cell at constant rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Lastly, we assume that immune cells will eliminate the infected monocytes at a constant rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>With these assumptions, we formulate the model for with-in host dengue viral infection with immune response and variable monocyte production rate, as the following.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula175"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We were able to find the values for normal susceptible counts and the normal M-CSF concentration, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the literature. The same is true for the decay rate of M-CSF, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref17">17</xref>] . The value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> was chosen so that in the absence of infection, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> form part of the disease-free equilibrium. This results in</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>The value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> was determined by a statistical analysis based on data</p><p>found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] , which we will discuss in detail in Section 4. Since we can express <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in terms of the other parameters, we decided to do so and work with the following version of the model:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula176"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>All model parameters are assumed to be positive.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Model Equilibria and Analysis</title><p>We will focus on the disease-free equilibrium<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the death equilibrium<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The Jacobian of the model is expressed below</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula177"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting the disease-free equilibrium into the Jacobian matrix results in</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula178"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And the tedious calculation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives the characteristic polynomial:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula179"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which, conveniently, is a product of three linear polynomials and a quadratic. Finding the roots of these four polynomials gives us the expressions for the eigenvalues given below.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula180"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>This allows us to formulate the following theorem:</p><p>Theorem 1. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then the disease-free equilibrium, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is locally asymptotically stable.</p><p>Proof. Recall that all parameter values are positive. Upon inspection, we can clearly see that all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> aside from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are either negative or will have real parts that are negative. In order to ensure that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has a negative real part we must require</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula181"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which leads to the result. W</p><p>By substituting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the model reaches the equilibrium</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>We refer to this as the “death” equilibrium even though the immune</p><p>cells are still present. We call this the “death” equilibrium since individuals do not function without monocytes. The resulting Jacobian in this case is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula182"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here the resulting characteristic polynomial is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula183"><label>. (12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this case also we can get expressions for eigenvalues, which are given below:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula184"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all sets of positive parameters, we see that this equilibrium is always unstable. We have also seen an interior persistence equilibrium in numerical simulations where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Parameter Values and Simulations</title><p>In this section we provide numerical simulations of different theoretical treatment techniques. We were able to find all parameters in the model in literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref17">17</xref>] except the parameters <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> was calculated as mentioned in Section 2. To calculate the parameter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we used the data provided in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] , which gave monocyte counts in individuals infected with dengue. It was found that the individuals had a mean monocyte count of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with a standard deviation of 370. We used MATLAB’S “randn” function to generate 200 random data sets (each with 15 points) from a normal distribution with that same mean and standard deviation. The 15 points were used as data values measured every 12 hours during a one week period. For each data set, we used MATLAB’S “fminsearch” function to find the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that minimized the function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72929-formula185"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. After these 200 values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> were found, we calculated their mean. We repeated this process many times and consistently got values in the lower-fifties, and we finally settled on the value<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The rest of the parameter values are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. We should also mention that this parameter set and all of the modified ones that follow result in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Comparisons with Previous Models</title><p>As previously mentioned, this model displays dynamics of the monocyte population that are more in agreement with the data in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] than previously studied models. Specifically, according to the data in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] , monocytes levels are actually elevated above the normal count of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> cells per L. We will demonstrate this with a comparison of the models in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref9">9</xref>] . We used the same values for the common parameters in each model and started with the initial conditions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively. We provide a plots of the monocyte counts in each of the three models. The results are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>We see that in both models with constant monocyte production the monocyte levels are never higher than the equilibrium. The new model with dynamic monocyte production does demonstrate this behavior and agrees quite well with the data in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Treatment Scenarios</title><p>There are several theoretical approaches to treating the disease. For example, the illness</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Parameter values</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0265</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of monocyte counts</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x95.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of monocyte counts</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x96.png"/></fig><p>might be less severe if the death rate of the infected cells, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, were increased. Another approach might be to reduce the infection rate, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, so that fewer monocytes are infected. We will present this case first. We held all other parameters fixed and examined theoretical treatments that could reduce <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by 10%, 25%, and then 50%. We then plotted the results along with the results from no treatment at all. The results are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>We see that while this type of treatment appears successful in reducing the viral and infected cell loads, it also prolongs the infection. Still, it seems like a promising approach. We can now compare this scenario with the previously mentioned increase in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the infected monocyte death rate. In this simulation we increase the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by 10%, 25%, and then 50% and then plotted the results along with the case without treatment. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>It can be seen here that the model has nearly no sensitivity to the parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and is predicting that treatments of this type are likely not worth exploring. Another approach might be to increase the death rate, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, of free viruses. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> we present the resulting plots from increasing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by 10%, 25%, and 50%.</p><p>Again the model reacts very little to adjusting this parameter suggesting that increasing the free viral death rate is not a useful strategy. Another logical approach is to reduce the number of new viruses produced by an infected monocyte,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> we present plots resulting from reducing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by 10%, 25%, and 50%.</p><p>One can see the most drastic reaction in this case. By reducing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by 50% we see a more than 50% reduction in the viral load. Therefore it appears that treatments that reduce the number of new viruses produced by infected monocytes are the most efficient.</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Infected cell and virus populations measured with varying <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x108.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Infected cell and virus populations measured using varying <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x110.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Infected cell and virus populations measured with varying <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x112.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Infected cell and virus populations measured using varying <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x114.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper we have presented a new model for within-host dengue infection. The new approach does not assume that the monocyte production is constant throughout infection and includes a fifth equation that models the production of the primary stimulant for monocyte production, Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF). By modeling the production of monocyte counts dynamically, our model has produced qualitative behavior not seen in previous models. Namely, that monocyte counts are elevated above the equilibrium during at least some period of infection. This behavior is in agreement with available data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72929-ref10">10</xref>] . We were also able to find the net reproductive rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and thus obtain a stability result for the disease-free equilibrium. While the current treatment of dengue infection is only supportive care in the form of hydration and pain relievers, we have explored theoretical approaches that might affect viral loads and reduce the severity of symptoms. Through simulations we have seen that two approaches seem promising. The first is the reduction of the infection rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of monocytes by viruses. The second and most effective theoretical treatment strategy is to reduce the number of new viruses, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7403426x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, produced by each infected monocyte.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the Editor and the referee for their comments. This work was partially funded by the Marquette Fellowship at Loyola University New Orleans.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Thibodeaux, J.J. and Hennessey, M. (2016) A Within-Host Model of Dengue Infection with a Non- Constant Monocyte Production Rate. Applied Mathematics, 7, 2382-2393. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.718187</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72929-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B?ck, A.T. and Lundkvist, ?. (2013) Dengue Viruses—An Overview. Infection Ecology and Epidemiology, 3, 19839. https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v3i0.19839 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2005) Tropical Disease Research, Making Health Research Work for Poor People, Progress 2003-2004, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noisakran, S., Chokephaibulkit, K., Songprakhon, P., et al. (2009) A Reevaluation of the Mechanisms Leading to Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1171, E24-E35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05050.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W.K., Sung, T.L., Tsai, Y.C., Kao, C.L., Chang, S.M. and King, C.C. (2002) Detection of Dengue Virus Replication in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Dengue Virus Type 2-Infected Patients by a Reverse Transcription-Real-Time PCR Assy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40, 4472-4478. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.12.4472-4478.2002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ansari, H. and Hesaaraki, M. (2012) A With-In Host Dengue Infection Model with Immune Response and Beddington-DeAngelis Incidence Rate. Applied Mathematics (Irvine), 3, 177-184. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2012.32028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nikin-Beers, R. and Ciupe, S.M. (2015) The Role of Antibody in Enhancing Dengue Virus Infection. Mathematical Biosciences, 263, 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2015.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ben-Shachar, R. and Koelle, K. (2015) Minimal Within-Host Dengue Models Highlight the Specific Roles of the Immune Response in Primary and Secondary Dengue Infections. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clapham, H.E., Tricou, V., Chau, N.V.V., Simmons, C.P. and Ferguson, N.M. (2014) Within-Host Viral Dynamics of Dengue Serotype 1 Infection. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11, 21040094. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0094</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nuraini, N., Tasman, H., Soewono, E. and Sidarto, K.A. (2009) A With-In Host Dengue Infection Model with Immune Response. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49, 1148-1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klekamp, B.G. (2011) Assessing the Relationship of Monocytes with Primary and Secondary Dengue Infection among Hospitalized Dengue Patients in Malaysia, 2010: A Cross-Sectional Study. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, University of South Florida.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ackleh, A.S., Deng, K., Ito, K. and Thibodeaux, J.J. (2006) A Structured Erythropoiesis Model with Nonlinear Cell Maturation Velocity and Hormone Decay Rate. Mathematical Biosciences, 204, 21-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2006.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banks, H.T., Cole, C.E., Schlosser, P.M. and Tran, H.T. (2004) Modeling and Optimal Regulation of Erythropoiesis Subject to Benzene Intoxication. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 1, 15-48. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2004.1.15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bélair, J., Mackey, M.C. and Mahaffy, J.M. (1995) Age-Structured and Two-Delay Models for Erythropoiesis. Mathematical Biosciences, 128, 317-346.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(94)00078-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, K., Salooja, N., Donahue, R.E., Hegde, U. and Linch, D.C. (1992) Human Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Levels Are Elevated in Pregnancy and in Immune Thrombocytopenia. Blood, 80, 2897-2902.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akashi, M. and Koeffler, H.P. (1992) Colony Stimulating Factors: Regulation of Production. Modern Trends in Human Leukemia IX, 83-92.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76829-3_16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pang, T., Cardosa, M.J. and Guzman, G.M.G. (2007) Of Cascades and Perfect Storms: The Immunopathogenesis of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever-Dengue Shock Syndrome (DHF/ DSS). Immunology &amp; Cell Biology, 85, 43-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.icb.7100008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72929-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roth, P., Dominguez, M.G. and Stanley, E.R. (1998) The Effects of Colony-Stimulating Factor-1 on the Distribution of Mononuclear Phagocytes in the Developing Osteopetrotic Mouse. Blood, 91, 3773-3783.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>