<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJAA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-4717</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijaa.2016.64034</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJAA-72885</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  On the Gamma-Ray Bursts Origin
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>G. Syromyatnikov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>425</fpage><lpage>434</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>18,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>21,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Gamma-ray (GRBs) and X-ray Bursts are millisecond-10 and 1000 seconds-long events of unknown origin. Recent simulations of the merger of binary neutron star systems do not generate a magnetically dominated called funnel nor a relativistic outflow. New models for the detection the afterglow of GRB 121024A, measured 0.15 days after the burst, invoke anisotropy as required to produce the complex microphysics of realistic shocks in relativistic jets. On the other hand the non-thermal gamma-rays are supposed to be produced by a fireball of relativistic e<sup style="white-space:normal;">&amp;minus;</sup>e<sup>+</sup> pairs that are created by annihilation of neutrino-antineutrino pairs in the vicinity of the hot, merged object. It is also known that in a system of a large number of fermions with pairs, gravitational interaction occurs a spontaneous breaking of the vacuum spatial symmetry, accompanied by gravitational mass defect. If spherical symmetry is broken, as in the known case of the merger scenario where a rapidly rotating disk can be formed and material is pulled away from rotation axis by centrifugal forces, then a baryon-free funnel along the rotation axes may allow relativistic beam of γ’s and e<sup>&amp;minus;</sup>e<sup>+</sup> to escape. It might lead to matter ejection with Lorentz factors of ~10<sup>2</sup> - 10<sup>3</sup> which are in the right range to enable copious gamma production during shock interaction with ambient interstellar gas. Here we show that the space rays generation mechanism on a method of direct transformation of intergalactic gamma-rays to the proton current on spin shock-waves ensure precise agreement between generated proton currents (spin shock waves theory) with the angular distribution data of Galactic gamma-rays as well as for the individual pulses of gamma-/X-ray bursts. There is a precise confirmation of the generated currents (theory) with the burst radiation data characterized by the standard deviation of &#177;1% in intensity in relative units within the sensitivity of the equipment. Thus, it was found that the spin angular momentum conservation law (equation of dynamics of spin shock waves) in the X-ray/gamma ranges is fulfilled exactly in real time. The next step involves setting the inverse problem of determining the wave function disturbance on the differential of measured smoothing pulses. In the asymptotic large times the problem is reduced to the solutions of the functional equation with shift of the argument. This will give additional information about the change speed of the wave, as well as on the interaction. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gamma-Ray Bursts</kwd><kwd> Spin Density Waves</kwd><kwd> Spin Shock Waves</kwd><kwd> Gravitational Mass  Defect</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Gamma-ray (GRBs) and X-ray Bursts are millisecond-10 and 1000 seconds-long events of unknown origin. The nature of the jets and the role of magnetic fields in GRBs remain unclear. In article [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref1">1</xref>] about fully general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the merger of binary neutron star (BNS), systems were held a detailed investigation of the matter dynamics and of the magnetic field evolution, with particular attention to its global structure and possible emission of relativistic jets. However, in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref1">1</xref>] neither a magnetically dominated called funnel nor a relativistic outflow are observed. New models for the detection the afterglow of GRB 121024A, measured 0.15 days after the burst, invoke anisotropy as required to produce the complex microphysics of realistic shocks in relativistic jets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>GRBs of low-energy gamma-ray are associated with core-collapse supernovae (SN) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref3">3</xref>] . A theoretical understanding has emerged in the form of the fireball internal-external shocks model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref3">3</xref>] . According to this model, GRBs are produced when the kinetic energy of an ultrarelativistic flow is dissipated in internal collisions. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref4">4</xref>] , measurements of the X-ray afterglow of very intense gamma-ray bursts (allow a critical test of GRB theories) disagree with that predicted by widely accepted fireball models of GRBs. In another side, some pioneer work on the Non-Occurrence of Type I X-ray Bursts from the Black Hole candidates is due to Mitra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref5">5</xref>] and in this paper he concluded that “the Black Hole Candidates (BHCs) being uncharged and having finite masses cannot be Black Hole, because uncharged BHs have a unique mass M = 0”. “Thus the previous results that so-called BHCs are actually extremely hot, ultramagnetized, Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects rather than anything else get reconfirmation by non- occurrence of Type I X-ray bursts in BHCs”. On the same ground Tewari and Charan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref7">7</xref>] presented some mathematical evidences for Eternally Collapsing radiating Star and constructed Supernova models in certain conditions in which BHCs can form with some remnant. Initially both the mass and physical radius of pre Supernova remains 2.4 <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and 4.86 km respectively at the time of black hole formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref6">6</xref>] . You can see that this time does not fit a range of millisecond GBRs pulses.</p><p>The main objective of this work is to make sure the extensive materials of reviews on gamma-bursts at least within the range of millisecond pulses, and the nature of gamma-bursts is largely determined by the influence of powerful external sources. So when their exploration occurs, the space rays generation mechanism on a method of direct transformation of intergalactic gamma-rays to the proton current on spin shock-waves must be included in the consideration, which ensures precise agreement between generated proton currents (spin shock waves theory) with the angular distribution data of Galactic gamma-rays as well as for the individual pulses of X-ray bursts.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Overview</title><p>Also cusps of superconducting strings can serve as GRB engines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref8">8</xref>] . A powerful beamed pulse of electromagnetic radiation from a cusp produced a jet of accelerated particles, whose propagation is terminated by the shock responsible for GRB. The string scale of symmetry breaking near 100 TeV to which is close to the LHC, together with reasonable assumptions about the magnitude of cosmic magnetic fields and the fraction of volume that they occupy, explains the GRB rate, duration, and fluency, as well as the observed ranges of these quantities. This model predicts that GRBs are accompanied by strong bursts of gravitational radiation which should be detectable by LIGO, VIRGO, and LISA detectors. Another prediction is the diffuse X- and gamma-ray radiation at 8 MeV-100 GeV with a spectrum and flux comparable to the observed. The weakness of the model is the prediction of too low a rate of GRBs from galaxies, as compared with observations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref8">8</xref>] . This suggests that [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref8">8</xref>] GRBs from cusps are responsible for only a subset of the observed GRBs not associated with galaxies.</p><p>Thus, anyway the success of numerous predictions requires consideration of internal-external sources. And yet must be (X-ray) afterglows.</p><p>On the other hand the non-thermal gamma-rays are supposed to be produced by a fireball of relativistic e<sup>−</sup>e<sup>+</sup> pairs that are created by annihilation of neutrino-antineutrino pairs in the vicinity of the hot, merged object [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref9">9</xref>] . It is also known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref9">9</xref>] that a large number of fermions with a pair gravitational interaction occur a spatial symmetry spontaneous breaking, accompanied by gravitational mass defect (as all know the gravitational mass defect neutron stars reached 90%). If spherical symmetry is broken, as in the known case of the merger scenario where a rapidly rotating dick can be formed and material is pulled away from rotation axis by centrifugal forces, then a baryon-free funnel along the rotation axes may allow relativistic beams of γ’s and e<sup>−</sup>e<sup>+</sup> to escape. It seems to be extremely hard to account for the energy of cosmological gamma-bursts by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> annihilations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref9">9</xref>] .</p>The Range of Second Pulses<p>According to the Conformal Gauge Theory of Gravitation (CGTG) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref12">12</xref>] , the BHs metric of the constant curvature is conformal-flat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref13">13</xref>] . According to the CGTG in the Riemann-Cartan space of spherical symmetry it is indicates that as a result of the conformal conversion from the BHs metric to the Minkowski space flat metric the energy momentum tensor and the density are equal to zero. It like all other vacuum solution, as we see, is the solution of GR equations.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methods</title><p>Another thing if it happens under the influence of gamma rays from a powerful external source. It might lead to matter ejection with Lorentz factors of ~10<sup>2</sup> - 10<sup>3</sup> which is in the right range to enable copious gamma production during shock interaction with ambient interstellar gas (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref9">9</xref>] ). In another side there is an electromagnetic spin shock waves production from some gamma-rays sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref14">14</xref>] . Spin shock-waves, theoretically grounded on basic characteristics of the spin angular momentum density, as a part of a full angular momentum to spin shock-waves of electromagnetic nature in cold nonneutral plasma. Moreover it is taking into account the contribution of the famous two bubbles 20˚ field in the angular distribution of gamma-radiation in addition to diffuse from the Galactic plane allowed to successfully conclude a precise agreement between generated proton currents (spin shock-waves theory) with the Galaxy gamma-radiation, characterized by the standard deviation of &#177;1% in intensity in relative units within the sensitivity of the equipment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref14">14</xref>] . This is done within frame of the space rays generation mechanism of a method of direct transformation of intergalactic gamma-rays to the proton current on spin shock-waves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] . It should be mentioned that the “Eight spin shock-waves model” (ESSM), which is rounded based on an accurate solution of the Maxwell equations for a dust-like medium of charged particles (and which are identical to the spin conservation law) ion take into account those most required above spin polarization properties of previously unexplored. There are many quantum processes, all of which follow the spin conservation law of electromagnetic field. The Task was the following statement: Generating currents in the ground experiment of focusing radio waves to dielectric target (see link in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] ) is in the range of angles from 32˚ to 104˚ from the axis (the axis of anisotropy) in the direction towards incident radiation. The currents passed through the annular surface along the axis (the axis of anisotropy) source of the incident radiation flux. Reverse currents, extending in the direction of incident radiation, are limited to the limit angle 104˚. Theory allows determining the distribution of currents in the corners, measured from the axis of anisotropy. Generate currents in the ESSM (see, e.g. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] ) in the inner configuration space is in the same range of angles from 32˚ to 104˚ from the axis of anisotropy. Observation of the Galactic radiation has the ability to measure its intensity only per unit area, rather than across the entire annular surface. However, based on the symmetry of the distribution of currents along the annular surface that takes place in a land lab experiment, in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] it was performed and for the Galactic radiation. Then the comparison between the theory value of currents through the annular surface based on the Galactic longitude and intensity of gamma-radiation per unit of that surface becomes more defined.</p>Equations<p>The Eight spin shock waves model is grounded on basic of an accurate solution of the Maxwell equations for a dust-like medium of charged particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref17">17</xref>] . Actually Maxwell equations for a dust-like medium of charge particles in the flat space</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>in the Lorentz gauge</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>reduced identically to the conservation law of the density spin tensor <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the self-consistent electromagnetic field A<sub>μ</sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.72885-formula206"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>ρ<sub>e</sub> is an electric charge invariant density, u<sub>μ</sub> is 4-speed of particles (u<sup>2</sup> = 1), e is an electron charge, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a partial derivative, c is a speed of light in vacuum, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a gauge function.</p><p>As a result, it was found that the Lorentz busts and Euler’s angles</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are functions of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> variable which satisfies the linear wave equation:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the D’Alambert operator. An electric charge density</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72885-formula207"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The current density</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72885-formula208"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The model is grounded on the static exact solution of Maxwell’s equations. Lorentz transform one-dimensional and three-dimensional solutions appear to mean a quasi- stationary wave soliton type. In relation to the fulfillment of the above task, as if scattering on the Galactic plane can be used a flattened ellipsoid of rotation coordinates system:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Wave equation for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has a solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72885-formula209"><label>, (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>N is a number of spin flips. Then an electric full invariant charge</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72885-formula210"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>“a” is the radius of the disk of a constant potential surface σ = 0. The main problem was the selection of model Euler’s angles<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, providing limited integral values (4) and a current. The integrals from a charge and current through a cylindrical surface are calculated on the computer.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>To understand the tasks in this formulation was subjected to a theoretical treatment of the pulse of a discrete source of X-ray radiation of burst in terms of currents of the ESSM, depending on the time. This is done within the frame of the space rays generation mechanism of a method of direct transformation of intergalactic gamma-rays to the proton current on spin shock-waves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] . During pulse according to the theoretical model the vector of the current runs through the same range of angles in the ESSM inner configuration space and in range of Galactic longitudes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> (see Fig. 2 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] ) built the pulse for X-ray burst MXB 1730-335 on the artificial satellite Date of the Earth “Astron”, 1983 (see links in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] ) compared with the pulse delayed from the background (28 counts in 0.83 sec.). A similar build to the pulse of gamma-bursts (Fig. 2 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref18">18</xref>] ) the GBRs010412 in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> is satisfactory and improving after smoothing on the sliding window method on 5 points within 7˚ dispersion in internal configuration space model (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Bursts were far from the Galactic</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The X-ray burst MXB 1730-335 impulse of the first type in a map with the impulse of an Eight spin shock waves model currents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] , built from background level 40 counts for 0.83 seconds (horizontal line): theory (bold line), experiment (thin line) in the range of 1.3 - 12 keV</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x22.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The gamma-ray burst GBRs010412 impulse from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref18">18</xref>] , Fig. 2, of the first type in a map with the impulse of an Eight spin shock waves model currents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref23">23</xref>] , built from background level 23 counts for 31.825 seconds (horizontal line): theory (bold line), experiment (thin line) after smoothing on the sliding window method on 5 points (circles) and on 9 points (black circles)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x23.png"/></fig><p>plane. Therefore, absorption in the structure of the Galaxies can be neglected. There was a precise agreement between generated currents (theory) with the burst radiation, characterized by the standard deviation of &#177;1% in intensity in relative units within the sensitivity of the equipment. Thus, it was found that the spin angular momentum conservation law (equation of dynamics of spin shock waves) in the X-ray/gamma ranges is fulfilled exactly in real time. On the other hand gauge approach based on the connection between symmetries and conservation laws: according to the Noether’s theorem conserving of spin angular momentum means the isotropy of space and time. Further, despite the fact that the source of the incident radiations is not known in advance, the axis of anisotropy can be defined, but only at the end of the match the angular distribution of the observed intensity and theory. It is shown with dates (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref14">14</xref>] ), that the Galactic gamma-ray angular anisotropy axis has following Galactic coordinates: longitude (exactly) l = 96˚, latitude 20˚, that corresponds in the second equatorial coordinate system: right ascension α = 271˚, declination δ = 40˚. In a similar approach, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref19">19</xref>] the Galactic coordinate axis of anisotropy of the angular distributions of pulsars l = −94˚, that upon reflection gives l = 86˚ with b = 15˚ in the second equatorial coordinate system: right ascension α = 271˚, declination δ = 46˚. There is the Supernova/GRB connection (e.g. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref18">18</xref>] ): “the GRB occurred on 25 April 1998 (GRB 980425). The event was not peculiar from the point of view of the Gamma-/X-ray phenomenology, but at its location a supernova (SN1998bw) showed up in the optical and radio band. The distance was 37 Mpc (z = 0.0085) thence the energetic was E<sub>iso</sub> = (8.5 &#177; 0.1) &#215; 10<sup>47</sup> erg, 3 or 4 orders of magnitude lower than that of typical bursts. Beside the positional coincidence, the SN explosion was (within one day) simultaneous to the GRB and, thence, the letter was likely the starting event”. A similar by a catalogue supernovae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref20">20</xref>] the coordinates of a core of supernovae are staked in required range 32˚ - 104˚ and the Galactic coordinate axis of anisotropy of the angular distribution of pulsar l = −94˚. However, I found the surprising fact: throughout on 5000 Supernovae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref20">20</xref>] tightly fill everywhere except for a single plot length 2˚ in the field axis anisotropy α = 271˚. In the theory, the massive corner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref21">21</xref>] particles defined with respect to axes of anisotropy A<sub>GS</sub> in proportion to their mass becomes zero for massless particles, photons. In this case we found that the mass (supernovae) does not appear in the α = 271˚. This and means that this place indicates the axis A<sub>GS</sub> of anisotropy of vacuum. In cases, the angular distributions anisotropy Galactic gamma-rays and pulsars using ESSM (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref23">23</xref>] ) is determined by the paradoxes way, so this sets the isotropy of space-time in according to the Noether’s theorem: due to the conservation of spin angular momentum, as a dynamics law for the Spin shock waves.</p><p>As know the gravitational mass defect for cusps of superconducting strings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref8">8</xref>] is equal to 5 GeV/c<sup>2</sup> on a spinor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref22">22</xref>] . It is not enough for the prediction of the diffuse gamma-ray radiation at 10 GeV - 100 GeV. Thus neutron stars cannot serve as GRB engines. In another side the gravitational mass defect for supernovae systems with black holes is equal to 11 GeV/c<sup>2</sup> on a spinor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref22">22</xref>] . It is enough for the prediction of the diffuse gamma-ray radiation at 10 GeV - 100 GeV. For a two balls Galactic system the gravitational mass defect is equal to 15 GeV/c<sup>2</sup> on a spinor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref22">22</xref>] . It is enough for the prediction of the diffuse gamma-ray radiation at 10 GeV - 100 GeV too.</p><p>Prospects: the origin of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref24">24</xref>] considered that a number of Theoretical treatments of the pulses of discrete sources of X-rays/gamma-rays radiation of bursts in terms of currents of the ESSM, depending on the time, in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the next step involves setting the inverse problem of determining the wave function disturbance on the differential of measured smoothing pulses. In the asymptotic large times the problem is reduced to the solution of the functional equation with shift of the argument. This will give additional information about the change speed of the wave, as well as on interaction.</p><p>In additionally, the ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) generation mechanism on a method of direct transformation of intergalactic gamma-rays (and so bursts) to the current on spin shock-waves and X-ray is FRBs can be observed as ULXs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref25">25</xref>] . Observation of repeated fast radio bursts means that in the range of Decimetric waves has a place the same mechanism from external sources, but with different characteristics including the absorption of free electrons. Similarity X-bursts radio-bursts in theory, except for the basic types can be even 3 types. All they have to go to a certain time sequence one after another by the number N of spin-flip of the electromagnetic field spin.</p><p>Analysis of formation of spin shock-waves when considering relativistic interaction in charged nonneutral plasma is given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref23">23</xref>] . It is shown that the mechanism of formation of the front of spin shock-waves is overturning a simple wave arising during the propagation of waves in the interelectrode gap due to the inverse proportionality of the phase velocity of a wave from its amplitude. The Eight spin shock-waves model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref23">23</xref>] , because of its local scale and Conformal invariance, in the low energy limit in the field of physics of solid turned out to be totally indistinguishable from the dual spin eight semiclassical trajectories of electrons when the magnetic breakdown of metals with spin flip. In quasy-classical approximation, the electric field potential (as well as its spin) is a classic. The fundamental nature of spin shock waves is not limited to either only from known species interaction is electromagnetic, weak, strong, or gravity, but in the general case is defined by their cumulative effects. The formation of a new kind of isospin shock waves with isospin flip from the isospin I = +1 (scattering goes mainly on the proton (90%) with the isospin I = +1) to I = −1 (scattering goes mainly on the neutron (also 90%) with the isospin I = −1) in a deep inelastic scattering of electrons and neutrinos on the deuteron in the area of cumulative meson production demonstrated in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref23">23</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Thus, anyway the success of numerous predictions requires consideration of internal- external sources. And it must still be (X-ray) afterglows. On the other hand, the non- thermal gamma-rays are supposed to be produced by a fireball of relativistic e<sup>−</sup>e<sup>+</sup> pairs that are created by annihilation of neutrino-antineutrino pairs in the vicinity of the hot, merged object [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref9">9</xref>] . It is also known that a large number of fermions with a pair gravitational interaction occur a spatial symmetry spontaneous breaking, accompanied by gravitational mass defect (as all know the gravitational mass defect neutron stars reached 90%). If spherical symmetry is broken, as in the known case of the merger scenario where a rapidly rotating dick can be formed and material is pulled away from rotation axis by centrifugal forces, then a baryon-free funnel along the rotation axes may allow relativistic beams of γ’s and e<sup>−</sup>e<sup>+</sup> to escape. It seems to be extremely hard to account for the energy of cosmological gamma-bursts by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4500616x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> annihilations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref9">9</xref>] . Another thing is this may occur under the influence of gamma-rays from a powerful external source. The Gamma-ray bursts origin clearly disclosed within frame of the space rays generation mechanism of a method of direct transformation of intergalactic gamma-rays to the proton current on spin shock-waves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref16">16</xref>] . There is a reason to believe that the initiation of such explosive astronomical phenomenon as supernovae is the same origin, because the coordinates of a core of supernovae are staked in required range, 32˚ - 104˚, in Galactic co-ordinates. In addition, here the surprising fact is found: 5000 supernovae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref20">20</xref>] densely fills the space everywhere except for a single area with a length of 2˚, situated in the area of axis of anisotropy α = 271˚. Also of interest is that cusps of superconducting strings can serve as GRBs engines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref8">8</xref>] . As of superconducting strings in our Galaxy can serve areas mentioned spheres above, because their radii 15,000 light years coincided with the calculated radius of a superconducting condensate of gravitating fermion system on helium-3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72885-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>The next step involves setting the inverse problem of determining the wave function disturbance on the differential of measured smoothing pulses. This will give additional information about the change of the speed of the wave, as well as on the interaction.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Syromyatnikov, A.G. (2016) On the Gamma-Ray Bursts Origin. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6, 425-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2016.64034</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72885-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kawamura, T., Giacomazzo, B., Kastaun, W., Ciolfi, R., Endrizzi, A., Baiotti, L. and Perna, R. (2016) Binary Neutron Star Mergers and Short Gamma-Ray Bursts: Effects of Magnetic Field Orientation, Equation of State, and Mass Ratio. Physical Review D, 94, 064012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.064012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wiersema, K., Covino, S., Toma, K., van der Horst, A.J., et al. (2014) Circular Polarization in the Optical Afterglow of GRB 121024A. Nature, 509, 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piran, T. (2005) The Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 1143. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dado, S. and Dar, A. (2016) Critical Test of Gamma-Ray Burst Theories. Physical Review D, 94, 063007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.063007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitra, A. (2006) On the Non-Occurrence of Type I X-Ray Bursts from the Black Hole Candidates. Advances in Space Research, 38, 2917-2919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tewari, B.C. and Charan, K. (2015) Horizon Free Eternally Collapsing Anisotropic Radiating Star. Astrophysics and Space Science, 357, 107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-015-2335-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tewari, B.C., Charan, K. and Rami, J. (2016) Spherical Gravitational Collapse of Anisotropic Radiating Fluid Sphere. IJAA, 6, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2016.62013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berezinsky, V., Hnatyk, B. and Vilenkin, A. (2001) Gamma Ray Bursts from Superconducting Cosmic Strings. Physical Review D, 64, 043004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janka, H.-T. and Ruffert, M. (1995) Can Neutrinos from Neutron Star Mergers Power Gamma-Ray Bursts? Astronomy and Astrophysics, 307 No. 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syromyatnikov, A.G. (1991) Gauge Invariance Problem in Field Theory with Dynamic Torsion. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 87, 444-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016586</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Satarov, A.G. and Syromyatnikov, A.G. (1992) O nekotorih osobennostyah dvuh podhodov k affinno-metricheskoi teorii gravitatcii [On Some Features of Two Approaches to the Affine-Metric Theory of Gravitation]. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 92, 1, 150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Satarov, A.G. and Syromyatnikov, A.G. (1993) On Some Features of Two Approaches to the Affine-Metric Theory of Gravitation. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, 799-801.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Norden, A.P. (1976) Spaces of the Affine Connectivity. Nauka, Moscow.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syromyatnikov, A.G. (2015) New Horizons in Nuclear Physics, Nuclear Engineering, Femto-and Nanotechnologies. Proceeding of the LXV International Conference “Nucleus-2015”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 29 June-3 July 2015, 173.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syromyatnikov, A.G. (2015) Similarity All-Known Particle/Resonance Mass and Nuclear Atomic Weight. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH &amp; Co. KG, Saarbrucken, Germany.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Syromyatnikov</surname><given-names> A.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>A Possible Mechanism for the Generation of Cosmic Rays</article-title><source> Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 108</fpage>-<lpage>112</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syromyatnikov, A.G. (1993) Method of Self-Consistent Field in Non-Linear Dynamics Problems. Tip. VKA, St. Petersburg, Russia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa, E. and Frontera, F. (2011) Gamma Ray Burst Origin and Their Afterglow: Story of a Discovery and More. La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, 34, 585-615. Arxiv:1107.1661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teilor, J.H., Manchester, R.N. and Lyne, A.G. (1993) Catalog of 558 Pulsars. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 88, 529-568.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CBAT: IAU Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams (2005). http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/lists/Supernovae.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syromyatnikov, A.G. (2015) On Some Features of Possible Torsion Effects on Observables at Hadron Colliders. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 12, 1550080.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syromyatnikov, A.G. (2016) The g-2 Muon Anomaly in Dimuon Production with the Torsion in LHC. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 13, 1650093.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syromyatnikov, A.G. (2012) Physical Effects of the Conformal Gauge Theory of Gravitation. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH &amp; Co. KG, Saarbrucken, Germany.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spitler, L.G., Scholz, P., Hessels, J.W.T., et al. (2016) A Repeating Fast Radio Burst. Nature 531, 202-205. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72885-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popov, S.B. and Pshirkov, M.S. (2016) Fast Radio Bursts Counterparts in Scenario of Supergiant Pulses. Arxiv:1605.01992[astro-ph.HE]</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>