<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AiM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3402</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2016.614097</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AiM-72825</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Benthic Bacteria Community Changes in Responses to Different Organic Resources from Macrophyte- and Algae-Dominated Areas of Lake Taihu, China
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yali</surname><given-names>Tang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dongmei</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaoqin</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ruohua</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Ecology and Institute of Hydrobiology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>14</issue><fpage>1040</fpage><lpage>1052</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>16,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Carbon resources play an important role in affecting the benthic bacterial community in shallow lakes. In this study, pyrosequencing was applied to compare bacteria phylogenic profile in incubated sediments with normal and exchanged organic detritus in macrophyte-dominated East Lake Taihu and algal-dominated Meiliang Bay. We observed significant bacteria species variations in sediments from two bays, regardless of treatments. RDA (Redundancy Analysis) analysis showed that sediment characteristics, especially concentrations of total nitrogen might account for this differentiation. Besides, algal-dominated Meiliang Bay sediment with addition of 
   Vallisneria
    detritus exhibited higher bacterial species variations than the sediment amended with 
   Microcystis
    detritus. To the contrary, sediments from macrophyte-dominated East Lake Taihu shared similar bacteria profile at all taxonomic levels and grouped together in MDS (multidimensional scaling) plots over the treatments with 
   Vallisneria
    or 
   Microcystis
    detritus addition into the sediment. We speculated that the different degradability of macrophyte detritus and algal detritus led to varied bacterial responses to exchanged organic resources and ultimately, the amounts, nutrient availability and degradability of organic resources may be main reasons for benthic bacteria community structure differentiation between the two states in shallow lakes. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Macrophyte-Dominated Lake</kwd><kwd> Algal-Dominated Lake</kwd><kwd> Benthic Bacteria</kwd><kwd>  Pyrosequencing</kwd><kwd> Organic Resources</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Shallow lakes can have two alternative equilibria: a clear state dominated by aquatic vegetation, and a turbid state characterized by high algal biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref2">2</xref>] . These two aquatic ecosystems differ dramatically from the very beginning of the food web―pro- ducers as macrophyte or phytoplankton respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref4">4</xref>] . The producers support the lives including bacteria in water column, causing significant differences in bacterioplankton community composition between two ecological states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref6">6</xref>] . The detritus of dead phytoplankton and macrophyte would also sink into the sediment, and serve as important carbon resources supporting benthic bacteria growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref10">10</xref>] , accompanying with benthic bacteria community differentiation. Shao et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref11">11</xref>] explored these benthic bacteria community structure varied both in the surface sediment and also across vertical gradients in two ecological states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref12">12</xref>] , using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in conjunction with sequence analysis (phylogenetic analysis). However, the low resolution of phylogenetic information revealed by DGGE cannot give a reasonable explanation. Pyrosequencing, using the detection of released pyrophosphate (PPi) during DNA synthesis, is an alternative technology for much more detailed characterization of nucleic acids than DGGE [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Besides, Jones and Lennon developed a theoretical model demonstrating the microbial dormancy strategy. They reported that even if a huge range of microbial types are present, only few of them are adapted to local organic resource in most ecosystems, the remaining majority of species stay rare as dormant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref15">15</xref>] . Those rare species generate a seed bank, which comprises individuals prepared to be resuscitated following environmental changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref16">16</xref>] , in our case, the input of different organic resources. For the above information, we assume that the dominant benthic bacteria from these two alternative equilibria are acclimatized to their different local organic resources as mainly phytoplankton detritus and macrophyte detritus, and eventually result in benthic bacteria community composition differentiation. In that way, if we exchange their carbon resources, dramatically bacterial species variation with exchanged dominant species would be observed.</p><p>To testify this hypothesis, we sampled sediment cores from these two ecological ecosystems and incubated them with exchanged organic resources as Vallisneria sp. detritus and Microcystis sp. detritus, respectively. Pyrosequencing was carried out for the benthic bacteria inventory. Over 9000 16S rRNA gene fragment sequences from each of four sediment samples were obtained. This lab experiment will help us understanding how functional benthic bacteria shift during Lake Regime shift from a clear state dominated by aquatic vegetation to a turbid state characterized by high algal biomass and give us hints for lake management.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Study Area</title><p>Lake Taihu, as the third biggest lake in China, holds a surface area of ~2338 km<sup>2</sup> and an average depth of 1.9 m. Besides, it exhibits spatial heterogeneity in physicochemical conditions and plankton community structure, with macrophyte- and alage-dominated zones separated by clearly defined boundaries, creating the right model for studying these two aquatic ecosystems. The lake is located in the Yangtze Delta in eastern China (30˚55'N - 31˚32'N, 119˚52'E - 126˚36'E). The two sampling sites are located in East Lake Taihu (31˚10'02'', 120˚22'57'') and Meiliang Bay (31˚28'39'', 120˚12'35'') in Wuxi. East Lake Taihu is a typical submerged macrophyte-dominated zone with high biomass of Vallisneria sp., while Meiliang Bay, located in the northern part of the lake, is characterized by high densities of Microcystis sp. and an absence of submerged macrophytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Experimental Settings</title><p>Six intact sediment cores (inner diameter = 15 cm) including 3 form East Lake Taihu and the other 3 from Meiliang Bay were sampled at a depth of 20 cm and transported to the laboratory on August 22, 2012. The coreliners used for sampling consisted of transparent acrylic cylinders (15 &#215; 33 cm, inner diameter &#215; height; sediment surface equivalent to 176.7 cm<sup>2</sup>) that were capped at both ends with rubber stoppers. After the acclimation and sediment stabilization period of 24 h, each core from two different lake areas was taken out of the system and sampled to provide an initial state (regarded as EB and MB), others were used as incubation chambers. We added Microcystisdetritus to one sediment chamber from Meiliang Bay and Vallisneria detritus to one sediment chamber from East Lake Taihu as normal state and the control (regarded as Meiliang Bay sediment with Microcystisdetritus, MM and East Lake Taihu sediment with Vallisneriadetritus, EV respectively). The rest two chambers were added with exchanged detritus (Meiliang Bay sediment with Vallisneriadetritus, MV and East Lake Taihu sediment with Microcystis detritus, EM respectively). The biomass added was all 24.2 g to reflect the natural phytoplankton biomass deposition found in Lake Taihu and to be comparable. All the chambers were incubated at 28.5˚C for 5 days. Both Vallisneria sp. and Microcystis sp. were collected from Lake Taihu in according sampling sites and prepared as detritus by freeze-drying and grinding.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_3"><title>2.1.3. Analysis of Environmental Parameters</title><p>After incubation, pH was measured immediately for surface sediments (0 - 1 cm).We also sampled the surface sediments (0 - 1 cm). The freeze-dried sediments were homogenised with a mortar and pestle and passed through a No. 10 sieve (2 mm sieve mesh openings). Chlorophyll a (Chl a) was extracted from freeze dried samples of approximately 1 g by leaching for 24 h in 90% acetone at 4˚C in the dark. Chl a content was then analyzed using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref19">19</xref>] . Analysis of sediment total organic carbon concentrations (TOC), total nitrogen concentrations (TN) and total phosphorus concentrations (TP) were processed using an elemental analyzer (EA3000, EuroVector).</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_4"><title>2.1.4. DNA Extraction, 16 S rRNA Construction and Pyrosequencing</title><p>The MoBioUltraClean Soil DNA isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories, USA) was used to extract total microbial community DNA from approximately 1 g of material per sample following the protocol of the manufacturer. DNA concentrations were qualified using NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc, DE). The V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene (E. coli position 357 to 926) was targeted by barcoded primers for their high variability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref20">20</xref>] . The sequences of the partial 16S rRNA genes were detected using a GS-FLX 454 sequencer (Roche). Fastaq files containing sequences were submitted to NCBI Sequence Read Achive (SRX 1283592).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sequences and Statistic Analysis</title><p>Raw sequence reads were retrieved and subjected to the PyroNoise algorithm for removal of 454 sequencing errors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref21">21</xref>] . Furthermore, primer sequences were trimmed and reads only between 200 bp (not including primer sequences) to 1000 bp were included. Sequences with chimeras were excluded using the UChime algorithm on the Mothur platform [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref23">23</xref>] . Pairwise distances between aligned sequences were calculated. Sequences lower than 97% similarity (or 0.03 distance) were clustered into unique operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in Mothur. RDP Classifier was used to assign taxonomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref24">24</xref>] . Alpha diversity analysis like Shannon index and rarefaction curve was performed by QIIME [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref25">25</xref>] . Beta diversity was calculated based on Bray-Curtis similarity matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref26">26</xref>] , and the resulting matrix was used for multidimensional scaling (MDS) of the samples by PRIMER v5.0 software. To evaluate the influences of environmental variables on OTU variation in sediment samples, redundancy analyses (RDA) were performed using CANOCO 5.0 (SCIENTIA Software), for Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) run on species variables indicated that the longest gradient was &lt;3. Forward selections were performed for a selection of restrictive factors. The significance of the canonical axes together was assessed in permutation tests with 499 unrestricted Monte Carlo permutations.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Microbial Diversity</title><p>A total of 45,438 effective reads was produced by pyrosequencing analysis of 16 S rRNA gene amplicons. 5270 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% sequence similarity were finally obtained. The rarefaction curves constructed on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequences nearly reached saturation level for the samples, suggesting that nearly entire microbial community was well covered (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The phylogenetic affiliation of microbes was assigned to 17 bacterial phyla, 3 candidate divisions at the phylum level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and distributed into 65 categories at class level, 182 categories at family level and 314 categories at genus level. All the sediments shared the same dominant species at phylum level as Proteobacteria (33.0% - 44.2%), Acidobacteria (8.5% - 13.3%), Actinobacteria (2.5% - 10.1%), Choloflexi (2.4% - 5.1%), Nistrospira (0.9% - 2.6%), Firmicutes (0.8% - 2.3%).Those are common phyla in lake sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref28">28</xref>] . Bar chart displaying the bacterial community composition of each sample at class level was also showed below (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). East Lake Taihu sediment</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Diversity of microbial communities in sediment samples. EB represents non-incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu. EV represents incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu with Vallisneria detritus. EM represents sediment sample from the East lake Taihu incubated with Microcystis detritus. MB represents non-incubated sediment sample from Meiliang Bay. MM represents incubated sediment sample from Meiliang Bay with Microcystis detritus. MV represents sediment sample from Meiliang Bay incubated with Vallisneria detritus</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2270869x2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Visual representation of microbial distribution in samples at the phylum level, giving the 20 recognized taxa in all samples with unidentified taxa included as ‘Other’. EB represents non-incubated sediment samples from East lake Taihu. EV represents incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu with Vallisneria detritus. EM represents sediment sample from the East lake Taihu incubated with Microcystis detritus. MB represents non-incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay. MM represents incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay with Microcystis detritus. MV represents sediment from Meiliang Bay incubated with Vallisneria detritus</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2270869x3.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Bar chart displaying the bacterial community composition at class level. “Other” refers to unidentified class with no previous report of former taxa. EB represents non-incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu. EV represents incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu with Vallisneria detritus. EM represents sediment sample from the East lake Taihu incubated with Microcystis detritus. MB represents non-incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay. MM represents incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay with Microcystis detritus. MV represents sediment from Meiliang Bay incubated with Vallisneria detritus</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2270869x4.png"/></fig><p>bacteria profiles with different treatments and with time showed similar patternat class level. However, bacteria constitution from Meiliang Bay incubated sediment with Vallisneria detritus showed distinct pattern with that from the other two Meiliang Bay originated sediments.</p><p>A hierarchical cluster tree and a multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot was drawn using PRIMER 5.0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). These two figures showed a visual representation of the similarity of sediments based on their bacterial community composition at the 97% OTU level. The hierarchical cluster tree showed that sediments from the different ecological state were separated to different clusters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)). Meiliang Bay sediment sample incubated with Vallisneria sp. took another branch, apart from the other two Meiliang Bay sediment samples. In MDS plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)), we also noticed that all sediment samples from macrophyte-dominated East Lake Taihu were grouped together and dramatic species variations occurred among algae-dominated Meiliang Bay sediment samples incubated with exchanged organic resources.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Redundancy Analysis</title><p>We prepared a RDA biplot of the samples based on OUT level and 4 environmental variables (TN, TP, Chla, pH) to reveal the relationships between bacteria community changes and environmental parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). We observed significant differences in environmental characteristics in sediments originated from the two ecological sites (P &lt; 0.05). Sediments originated from algal-dominant area hold a higher average of TOC, TN, TP and Chla contents and a lower pH content than submerged macrophyte- dominated sediments.</p><p>In the graph, sediment samples from algae-dominated Meiliang Bay plotted on the right of axis 2, while Sediment samples from macorphyte-dominated Meiliang Bay plotted on the other side of axis 2. This RDA graph also demonstrated that TN played a significant role in the bacterial community variation in all sediments (p &lt; 0.05). The eigenvalues of the first and second axis were 0.3946 and 0.2334, respectively, and these 2 axes explained 63.8% of the bacterial OTU variation in sediments. Permutation test on all axes showed that pseudo-F = 1.8, p = 0.054.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. OTU Variations</title><p>At OTU level, 30% sequences was assigned to no more than 1% of the OTUs at 97% similarity levelin each sediment, other OTUs were found less than 20 sequences (&lt;0.37%). The large number of highly diverse, low-abundance OTUs constitutes a “rare biosphere” that might be inactive as a seed bank. SIMPER analysis was used to identify OTU variations in different sediment samples. OTUs contributed most to between-site</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Visual representation of the similarity of sediments based on their bacterial community composition at the 97% OTU level, including a. a MDS plot and b. a hierarchical cluster tree. Circles represent sediment samples from East lake Taihu. Triangles represent sediment samples from Meiliang Bay. Whites represent sediments without incubation. Blacks represent sediments incubated with Vallisneria detritus, and slashes represents incubated with Microcystis detritus</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2270869x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Redundancy analysis of biplots showed variable composition of bacteria in relation to the important environmental factors in different sediment samples. Circles represent sediment samples from East lake Taihu. Triangles represent sediment samples from Meiliang Bay. Whites represent sediments without incubation. Blacks represent sediments incubated with Vallisneria detritus, and slashes represents incubated with Microcystis detritus. Environmental variable marked with asterisks was significant (p &lt; 0.05)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2270869x6.png"/></fig><p>differentiation and their population densities based on phylogenetic information in each sediment sample were showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Similar species differentiations were observed in our incubated control sediment samples. Some of these OTUs stayed as top 1% OTUs in both two sediments at different ecological state, however in a distinct population density based on phylogenetic information. We also noticed that OTU00021 and OTU00019 stayed as rare species in Meiliang Bay sediment, and as dominant species in East Lake Taihu sediment. OTU00020 and OTU00024, to be opposite, stayed as rare species in East Lake Taihu sediment, and as dominant species in Meiliang Bay sediment.</p><p>OTUs contributed most to incubated Meiliang Bay sediments with Microcystis detritus and Vallisneria detritus and their population density in each sediment sample were showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. OTU00005, OTU00004, OTU00001, OTU0008 and OTU00021, which had high contribution to between-site bacteria species differentiation, also contributed significantly to Meiliang Bay sediments added with varied organic resources. There are some OTUs stayed a relatively high population density in sediment from both sites and got an even higher population density in Meiliang Bay sediments with altered organic resources.</p><p>We didn’t analyze the species variations between East Lake Taihu sediments with exchanged organic resourse for Bray-curtis dissimilarity calculated between them was less than the dissimilarity between the control and the background value.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Our bacteria inventory by pyrosequencing demonstrated significant between-origin</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> SIMPER analysis results displaying 10 OTUs contributes most to bacterial community differentiation between macrophyte-dominant East lake Taihu and algal-dominant Meiliang Bay and their population density based on phylogenetic information in different sediment samples. EB represents non-incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu. EV represents incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu with Vallisneria detritus. MB represents non-incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay. MM represents incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay with Microcystis detritus</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >OTU</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Assignation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EB (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MB (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Contribution (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EV (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MM (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acidobacteria Gp17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified Bacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actinobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Betaproteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Desulfobacteraceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified Bacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Betaproteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Betaproteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Betaproteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> SIMPER analysis results displaying OTUs contributes most to bacterial community differentiation between algal-dominant Meiliang Bay sediment incubated with Vallisneria detritus and with Microcystis detritus and their population density based on phylogenetic information in different sediment samples. EB represents non-incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu. EV represents incubated sediment sample from East lake Taihu with Vallisneria detritus. MB represents non-incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay. MM represents incubated sediment from Meiliang Bay with Microcystis detritus. MV represents sediment from Meiliang Bay incubated with Vallisneria detritus</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >OTU</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Assignation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MV (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MM (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Contribution (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MB (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EB (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EV (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified Bacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Desulfobacteraceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acidobacteria Gp17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acidobacteria Gp6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acidobacteria Gp6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified Bacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified Bacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified Bacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OTU00021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actinobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>species variations in algal-dominant Meiliang Bay originated sediments and macrophyte-dominant originated East Lake Taihu sediments, regardless of their different treatments. That result was possibly due to the different sediment characteristics between the two states. In the macrophyte-dominated state of East Lake Taihu, the organic fractions of the sediment mainly formed from the detritus of large vascular plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref12">12</xref>] . In contrast, cyanobacteria detritus is also an important organic resource in sediment from algal-dominated lake area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref29">29</xref>] . The higher primary production in cyanobacteria dominated areas of the lake increases the amount of organic resources. Besides, macrophytes were characterized as low N concentrations relatively to those of phytoplankton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref30">30</xref>] , which means their differences in nutrient availability. RDA analysis also showed that TN concentrations changes might have significantly impact on this between-origin differentiation.</p><p>There were no significant differences in sediment characteristics in incubated and non-incubated sediments, indicating that the nutrients we added into the sediments was much smaller compared to the intrinsic nutrients of sediments. All sediment samples from macrophyte-dominated East Lake Taihu also shared similar bacteria profile at all taxonomic levels and grouped together in MDS plots. However, in spite of similar sediment characteristics, the addition of Vallisneria detritus to algal-dominated Meiliang Bay sediment caused relatively large bacterial community changes comparing to the control and the background. Two main reasons may account for these different benthic bacteria responses. First is the different food quality of macrophyte and phytoplankton to bacteria. Comparing to labile phytoplankton, macrophyte was a less degradable resource for their complex tissue and high contents of lignin and fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref31">31</xref>] . Certain bacteria are mores specialized at complex substrate decomposition with a more complex process, eg. The excretion of extracellular enzymes like cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref33">33</xref>] . The addition of Vallisneria detritus to Meiliang Bay sediment made them more competitive, resulting in a elevated population density. Second, besides macrophyte-derived material, phytoplankton also contributed to sediment organic fraction in macrophyte dominated area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref35">35</xref>] . The identity and importance of the source materials that drive bacteria mineralization in sediments likely depends on a combination of their relative amounts and degradability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72825-ref36">36</xref>] . In that case, phytoplankton detritus is also an accustomed small fraction of substrate for benthic bacteria in East Lake Taihu, and small amount of Microcystis detritus was regarded as normal condition. Therefore, we observed low bacteria community composition dissimilarity between non-incubated sediment, incubated sediment with Microcystis detritus and with Vallisneria detritus.</p><p>Detailed OTUs variations furtherly demonstrated how benthic bacteria in Meiliang Bay responses to Vallisneria detritus amendment. OTU00005, OTU00004 and OTU0008, which had high contribution to between-origin bacteria species, became higher in population density based on phylogenetic information with input of Vallisneria detritus, possibly for their better use of macrophyte derived organic resources. OTU00021, dominant in East Lake Taihu but rare in Meiliang Bay sediment, was triggered into activity with the amendment of Vallisneria detritus. Rest OTUs staying as top 1% dominant bacteria in both Meiliang Bay and East Lake Taihu sediment might be able to decomposing both macrophyte detritus and phytoplankton detritus, while the addition of macrophyte detritus made them more competitive. We speculated that these OTUs were potentially specialized at macrophyte detritus degradation and their enhanced activity might responsible for the whole bacteria community composition changes with regard to macrophyte detritus addition in Meiliang Bay sediment.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In all, at least part of our hypothesis was true. The amounts, nutrient availability and the degradability of organic resources might have a profound effect on benthic bacteria community composition and ultimately caused benthic bacteria community differentiation in two ecological states.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported financially by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31000219, No. 31570456 and No. 31370476) and Foundation of Guangdong Educational Committee (No. LYM10026).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tang, Y.L., Chen, D.M., Yang, X.Q. and Xu, R.H. (2016) Benthic Bacteria Community Changes in Responses to Different Organic Resources from Macrophyte- and Algae-Dominated Areas of Lake Taihu, China. Advances in Microbiology, 6, 1040-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aim.2016.614097</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72825-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scheffer, M., Hosper, S.H., Meijer, M.L., Moss, B. and Jeppesen, E. (1993) Alternative Equilibria in Shallow Lakes. Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution, 8, 275-279.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90254-M</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C. and Walker, B. (2001) Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591-596. https://doi.org/10.1038/35098000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">von Donk, E. and Gulati, R.D. (1995) Transition of a Lake to Turbid State Six Years after Biomanipulation: Mechanisms and Pathways. Water Science &amp; Technology, 32, 197-206.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(95)00699-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Qin, B., Teubner, K. and Dokulil, M.T. (2003) Long-Term Dynamics of Phytoplankton Assemblages: Microcystis-Domination in Lake Taihu, a Large Shallow Lake in China. Journal of Plankton Research, 25, 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/25.4.445</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Llames, M.E., Paul, A.G., Zagarese, H., Ferraro, M. and Izaguirre, I. (2013) Alternative States Drive the Patterns in the Bacterioplankton Composition in Shallow Pampean Lakes (Argentina). Environmental Microbiology Reports, 5, 310-321.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Q., Zwart, G., Wu, J., Agterveld, M., Liu, S. and Hahn, M.W. (2007) Submersed Macrophytes Play a Key Role in Structuring Bacterioplankton Community Composition in the Large, Shallow, Subtropical Taihu Lake, China. Environmental Microbiology, 9, 2765-2774.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01388.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fallon, R.D. and Brock, T.D. (1980) Planktonic Blue-Green Algae: Production, Sedimentation, and Decomposition in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Limnology and Oceanography, 25, 72-88. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1980.25.1.0072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takamura, N. and Yasuno, M. (1988) Sedimentation of Phytoplankton Populations Dominated by Microcystis in a Shallow Lake. Journal of Plankton Research, 10, 283-299.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/10.2.283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mann</surname><given-names> K.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1988</year>)<article-title>Production and Use of Detritus in Various Freshwater, Estuarine, and Coastal Marine Ecosystems</article-title><source> Limnology and Oceanography</source><volume> 33</volume>,<fpage> 910</fpage>-<lpage>930</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Howarth, R.W. (1993) Microbial Processes in Salt-Marsh Sediments. In: Ford, T.E., Ed., Aquatic Microbiology: An Ecological Application. Blackwell, Massachusetts, 239-259.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shao, K., Gao, G., Qiang, B., et al. (2011) Comparing Sediment Bacterial Communities in the Macrophyte-Dominated and Algae-Dominated Areas of Eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 57, 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1139/w11-003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shao, K., Gao, G., Wang, Y., Tang, X. and Qin, B. (2013) Vertical Diversity of Sediment Bacterial Communities in Two Different Trophic States of the Eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 25, 1186-1194.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60122-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ronaghi, M. (2001) Pyrosequencing Sheds Light on DNA Sequencing. Genome Research, 11, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.11.1.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamady, M., Walker, J.J., Harris, J.K., Gold, N.J. and Knight, R. (2008) Error-Correcting Barcoded Primers for Pyrosequencing Hundreds of Samples in Multiplex. Nature Methods, 5, 235-237. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1184</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, S.E. and Lennon, J.T. (2010) Dormancy Contributes to the Maintenance of Microbial Diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 5881-5886.  
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912765107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lennon, J.T. and Jones, S.E. (2013) Microbial Seed Banks: The Ecological and Evolutionary Implications of Dormancy. Nature Reviews, 9, 119-130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qin, B.Q., Xu, P., Wu, Q., Luo, L. and Zhang, Y. (2007) Environmental Issues of Lake Taihu, China. Hydrobiologia, 581, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0521-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Black, K.D., Calder, L.A., Nickell, T.D., et al. (2012) Chlorophyll, Lipid Profiles and Bioturbation in Sediments around a Fish Cage Farm in the Gulf of Eilat, Israel. Aquaculture, 356-357, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ritchie, R.J. (2006) Consistent Sets of Spectrophotometric Chlorophyll Equations for Acetone, Methanol and Ethanol Solvents. Photosynthesis Research, 89, 27-41.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-006-9065-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adersson, A.F., Lindberg, M., Jakobsson, H.,B&amp;#228;ckhed, F., Nyrén, P. and Engstrand, L. (2008) Comparative Analysis of Human Gut Microbiota by Barcoded Pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE, 3, e2836. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002836</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quince, C., Lanzen, A., Davenport, R.J. and Turnbaugh, P.J. (2011) Removing Noise from Pyrosequenced Amplicons. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 38.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-38</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edgar, R., Haas, B.J., Clemente, J.C., Quince, C. and Knight, R. (2011) UCHIME Improves Sensitivity and Speed of Chimera Detection. Bioinformatics, 27, 2194-2200.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schloss, P.D., Westcott, S.L., Ryabin, T., et al. (2009) Introducing Mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 7537-7541.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cole, J., Wang, Q., Cardenas, E., et al. (2009) The Ribosomal Database Project: Improved Alignments and New Tools for rRNA Analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D141-D145.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn879</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caporaso, J.G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., et al. (2010) QIIME Allows Analysis of High-Throughput Community Sequencing Data. Nature Methods, 7, 335-336.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bray, J.R. and Curtis, J.T. (1957) An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27, 325-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942268</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spring, S., Schulze, R., Overmann, J. and Schleifer, K.-H. (2000) Identification and Characterization of Ecologically Significant Prokaryotes in the Sediment of Freshwater Lakes: Molecular and Cultivation Studies. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24, 573-590.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00559.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bai, Y.H., Shi, Q., Wen, D.H., et al. (2012) Bacterial Communities in the Sediments of Dianchi Lake a Partitioned Eutrophic Waterbody in China. PLoS ONE, 7, e37796.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, J., Li, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2013) The Fate of Cyanobacterial Detritus in Food Web of Lake Taihu: A Mesocosm Study Using 13C and 15N Labeling. Hydrobiologia, 710, 39-46.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1205-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duarte, C.M. (1992) Nutrient Concentration of Aquatic Plants: Patterns Cross Species. Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 882-889. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.4.0882</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ye, L., Wu, X., Tan, X., et al. (2010) Cell Lysis of Cyanobacteria and Its Implications for Nutrient Dynamics. International Review of Hydrobiology, 95, 235-245.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200911194</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wicks, R.J., Moran, M.A., Pittman, L.J. and Hodson, R.E. (1991) Carbohydrate Signatures of Aquatic Macrophytes and Their Dissolved Degradation Products as Determined by a Sensitive High-Performance Ion Chromatography Method. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57, 3135-3143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cunha, A., Almeida, A., Coelho, F.J.R.C., Gomes, N.C.M., Oliveira, V. and Santos, A.L. (2010) Bacterial Extracellular Enzymatic Activity in Globally Changing Aquatic Ecosystems. In: Mendez-Vilas, A., Ed., Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, 124-135.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Middelburg, J.J., Nieuwenhuize, J., Lubberts, R.K. and Plassche, O.V.D. (1997) Organic Carbon Isotope Systematics of Coastal Marshes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 45, 681-687. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1997.0247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boschker, H.T.S., de Brouwer, J.F.C. and Cappenberg, T.E. (1999) The Contribution of Macrophyte-Derived Organic Matter to Microbial Biomass in Salt-Marsh Sediments: Stable Carbon Isotope Analysis of Microbial Biomarkers. Limnology and Oceanography, 44, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.2.0309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72825-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouillon, S. and Boschker, H.T.S. (2006) Bacterial Carbon Sources in Coastal Sediments: A Cross-System Analysis Based on Stable Isotope Data of Biomarkers. Biogeosciences, 3, 175-185. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-175-2006</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>