Approximately 700,000 Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) procedures are performed annually in the US. By 2030, this number is expected to increase to 3.48 million per year [1] . In India, majority of the patients are undergoing TKA present at an advanced stage with a severe varus deformity. The success of a TKA depends on various factors which include appropriate choice of implant and meticulous surgical technique, one of which is closure of the arthrotomy. Anatomical and watertight arthrotomy closure reduces the dead space, and provides a tamponade effect thus reducing the hematoma formation [2] . Cases which have severe varus deformity, the medial soft tissue structures are contracted and shortened. The extended medial periosteal sleeve elevation has to be done in order to correct this deformity. After correction of this deformity in a TKA, there is a huge gap left between the incised soft tissues. The approximation of the periosteal sleeve with the patellar tendon becomes difficult and the sutures cut through the tissues if approximated forcefully. Various techniques can be used like metal clips or suture anchors for approximation of these structures. But these are expensive and have various disadvantages of infection.

We describe a technique of drilling holes into the tibial tuberosity to achieve better approximation and preventing cut through of sutures through the tissues.

The senior author performed and used this technique in 655 total knee arthroplasties done in 36 months and the steps were the same in all the cases. 212 knees (142 knees in females and 70 knees in males) were available for a short term review. All the included patients were Asian Indians and belonged to middle to high socio-economic class. The inclusion criteria were patients of all BMI (body mass index) presenting with severe varus deformities of the knee, where this technique was used and patients were available for a short term follow up.

Suitable anaesthesia is administered and the procedure is performed under tourniquet. A midline skin incision is made and deepened in layers till the fascia of quadriceps is reached. Medial arthrotomy is performed using the midvastus approach in which the vastusmedialis is dissected through its substance or by a medial para-patellar approach. A sub-periosteal sleeve is elevated over the medial aspect of proximal tibia with a cautery followed by a curved osteotome. Patellaplasty is performed [3] . Bone cuts are taken and cemented tibio-femoral components are inserted.

The arthrotomy closure is done with the knee in extension in the following sequence. Initially a box suture is taken at the superior pole of patella at the junction of the quadriceps with the vastusmedialis. A continuous interlocking suture is taken from the box suture till the proximal division of vastusmedialis. Another box suture is taken at the inferior pole of the patella with the quadriceps tendon. The two box sutures are then connected with continuous interlocking sutures.

Two pairs of holes are drilled over the medial aspect of tibial tuberosity with a 3.2 mm drill bit (Figure 1, Figure 2).

A towel clamp is used to convert the adjacent pair of holes into a curved tunnel through which a suture needle can pass (Figure 3, Figure 4).

Thus, two tunnels are created on the medial aspect of tibial tuberosity. A No.1 Polyglactin 910 suture with a reverse cutting needle is passed through the medially elevated periosteal sleeve (Figure 5), then into the tunnel (Figure 6) and then through the periosteum along with the patellar tendon on the other side.

Similar suturing is done through the other tunnel and then intermittent suture knots are tied (Figure 7, Figure 8).

Subcutaneous closure is done with interrupted No.1polyglactin suture and then interrupted sub-cuticular sutures are taken with absorbable undyed braided 2 - 0 polyglactin 910 with a reverse cutting needle.

Varus deformity of the knee is the most common indication for TKA. Compounding the problem, is the severity of varus deformity at presentation. Due to long standing deformity the medial soft tissue structures like medial capsule, medial collateral ligament and the pes anserinus are contracted and tight. Sub periosteal release corrects the deformity but at the same time increases the space between the tibial tuberosity and medial soft tissues. Passing sutures only through the soft tissues places a lot of stress on the tissues and the sutures tend to cut-out. Hence, the technique of passing sutures through the thick elevated periosteal sleeve into the bone tunnel was applied here. Suture anchors can supplant this technique.

The bone tunnel and suture anchor techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. The bone tunnel technique is the conventional method which is used since many years in areas like the ankle for ligament repair and for suturing external rotators in hip replacement in posterior approach [4] . This method is stronger, more secure, has remote chances of cut out of sutures without any additional increase in the cost of surgery [5] . Suture anchors are relatively expensive, with chances of pull out of anchors, anchor breakage, metal irritation, sterile inflammation and infection [6] . Bioabsorbable anchors which are a more desirable alternative to metallic fixation are advantageous in that they reduce the complications associated with the use of metal [7] . However, bioabsorbable suture anchors are associated with serous discharge, synovitis and cannot be visualized on radiographs.

Partial avulsion or peeling of the patellar tendon which occurs during eversion of patella [8] can also be sutured using this bone tunnel technique.

An optimal tension closure helps early rehabilitation and recovery [2] , reduces chances of patellar subluxation and improves patellar tracking [9] .

We recommend this technique of closure in patients after correction of severe varus deformity or with partial avulsion of the patellar tendon due to patellar eversion during TKA.

None.

Agarwala, S., Sharoff, L. and Chaudhari, S. (2016) Osteotendinous Suturing for Anchorage of Medial Arthrotomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Open Journal of Orthopedics, 6, 357-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2016.612048