<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2016.412003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-72639</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessing the Seawater Intrusion Due to Beach Wells in the Desalination Plant
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yunes</surname><given-names>Mogheir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Environmental Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ymogheir@iugaza.edu.ps</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>47</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>5,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Short-Term Low Volume (STLV) Sea Water Desalination Plant of 6000 m
  <sup>3</sup>/d is under construction in the middle area of Gaza Strip. The plant will provide desalinated water for 75,000 inhabitants in regions in Khanyounis and Rafah. The intake of desalination plant will be indirectly from four beach wells. This article aims at providing the environmental impacts of these wells on the aquifer and the mitigation measures in case of negative impacts. In order to study the impacts of beach wells on the aquifer, a prediction groundwater three-dimensional model for the beach wells area, starting from the year 2000 until year 2030, was used. MODFLOW software was used for modeling the groundwater flow and SEAWAT software was used to model the seawater intrusion effect. The aquifer parameters were set as if they were in the transient model. The long term seasonal recharge rate for the summer and winter is considered to represent the seasonal differences in recharge through each year. The study showed that the steady four-meter drawdown in the beach wells will force the flow from the eastern direction to the sea. This will have positive impacts on the aquifer since it will decrease the seawater intrusion to the aquifer. The beach wells will pump water with Cl concentration equal to 18,000 mg/l. This means that the beach wells will accelerate the flow from the aquifer to the sea direction but still the pumped water is considered as seawater. This indicates the positive impacts on the groundwater aquifer since it will decrease the seawater intrusion in the beach wells area (Gaza Strip Middle area). In conclusion, these beach wells in this desalination plant (small capacity) are safe for the groundwater aquifer and it will decrease the effect of seawater intrusion on the aquifer.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Beach Wells</kwd><kwd> Aquifer</kwd><kwd> Seawater Intrusion</kwd><kwd> Chloride</kwd><kwd> Desalination</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Various United Nations, bilateral and local agencies have continued with their efforts to identify solutions for water scarcity and salinity problems in Gaza strip. Several studies have been undertaken and plans and reports have been produced for interventions to address the potable water requirements of the people in the Gaza Strip which is recorded as one of the most heavily populated areas in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>At present the underground coastal aquifer represents the main source for water supply to the population of approximately 1.7 million living in Gaza. Minor volumes of fresh water (4.7 MCM/Year) are currently imported from Israel Mekorot Water Company in addition to other small amounts supplied from at least 13 existing (public) plants, for a total capacity of 7020 m<sup>3</sup>/day, and including 8 plants installed with UNI- CEF assistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The latest registry and monitoring records showed that annual sustainable yield of the coastal aquifer within the geographical boundary of Gaza is estimated to be 55 Million Cubic Meters (MCM). Recent rates of pumping from the aquifer are estimated at 170 MCM/year for both domestic and agricultural needs. The abstraction rates have increased significantly over the last three decades, due to a combination of inadequate available water imports to Gaza, the expanding population within Gaza, and the drilling and use of unlicensed wells (especially to provide irrigation for agricultural activities). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> showed that the over-abstraction has caused saline intrusion i.e. the entry of sea water to the aquifer from the Mediterranean Sea to the west, and also due to the lowering of the water table from deep groundwater abstraction to the south-east of Gaza by Israel. Water quality has been deteriorating rapidly, and modeling data suggest that the deterioration will continue further, with time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Massive over-pumping has led to increased saline intrusion as seawater from the adjacent Mediterranean enters and contaminates the aquifer as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> which shows chloride concentration in the groundwater aquifer in year 2015. Another quality problem is high concentration of nitrate in the agricultural areas in the north; the source of the nitrate ion in the groundwater chemical components has resulted from different sources i.e. intensive use of agricultural pesticides beside the existence of septic tanks to dispose the domestic wastewater in the areas where there is no wastewater collection system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The nitrate ion concentration reaches a very high range in different areas of the Gaza Strip, while the WHO standard recommended nitrate concentration less than 50 mg/L [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>At its present rate of deterioration, the United Nations estimates that the underlying portion of the coastal aquifer on which the Gaza Strip relies for all its water needs will be unusable by 2016, and irreversibly damaged by 2020 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref5">5</xref>] . The lack of adequate supply of safe drinking water is therefore exposing the lives the Palestinians in Gaza to high levels of health risks. It has now become crucially important to safeguard available fresh water supplies and provide new additional potable water supplies to protect the lives and public health of the people in Gaza. As such, both short term and long term solutions to address the water scarcity issues have been formulated with particular emphasis on reducing the dependency on fast deteriorating ground water aquifer sources, to seek new non-conventional water resource which in this case is limited to sea water desalination processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Short-Term Low Volume (STLV) Sea Water Desalination Plant of 6000 m<sup>3</sup>/d is being under construction in the middle area of Gaza Strip. The plant will provide desalinated water for 75,000 inhabitants in Khanyounis and Rafah (Southern Part of Gaza Strip). The plant consists of water intake (four beach wells), Reverse Osmoses (RO) desalination system, and brine outfall and carrier pipeline to transmit the desalinated water to the blending tanks.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chloride contour map 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref2">2</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Nitrate contour map 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref2">2</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x3.png"/></fig><p>The limited number of analytical solutions for variable density flow problems creates a heavy dependence on numerical codes for simulating seawater intrusion. Such computer models have become irreplaceable tools to gain insight in real-world seawater intrusion issues ranging from system understanding on local or regional scales to future projections of SI for management purposes. Most codes solve a coupled system of variable density flow and solute transport equations, which is numerically complicated and computationally demanding. The main difficulty lies in the accurate solution of the solute transport part, which requires a fine discretization of the aquifer. Common techniques such as the finite element or finite difference methods perform well for the solution of the flow equations. The most widely used codes are SEAWAT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref8">8</xref>] . SEAWAT was specifically designed for the simulation of SI, although it has many other applications as well, notably the combined simulation of groundwater flow and heat transfer. SEAWAT uses MODFLOW (finite differences) to solve the flow system and MT3D with its many solution techniques to solve the solute transport equations. Most MOD- FLOW packages are available in SEAWAT to simulate different stresses and boundary conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>This article will assess the impacts of water intake system on the aquifer. In case of negative impacts, mitigations measures will be addressed to minimize these negative consequences. The mean approach of this article is to use both MODFLOW and SEA- WAT will investigate the impact of the beach wells on the seawater intrusion in the middle area of Gaza Strip.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. STLV and Beach Wells</title><p>The STLV plant is located in Deir Al Balah Governorate, at the border with Khanyounis governorate, and will serve Rafah and Khanyounis governorates. 80 dunums have been allocated to this purpose from the Palestinian Land Authority (PLA) as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The feasibility study for the seawater intake option indicated that Beach Wells (BW) is the most feasible option for the STLV RO plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref10">10</xref>] . For this STLV plant with an intended capacity of 6000 m<sup>3</sup>/day, the expected pumping rate of the beach wells is between 13,500 to 14,000 m<sup>3</sup>/day. This number is calculated assuming a recovery rate of 48% and 3% for service water.</p><p>The number of beach wells was calculated based on the maximum quantity of water that can be pumped to serve the desalination plant which is a round 13,500 m<sup>3</sup>/day. The total number of wells is 3 wells in addition to one standby well. Each of the three beach wells should have a capacity of pumping equal to 200 m<sup>3</sup>/hour and should operate 24 hrs/day.</p><p>Based on the hydrogeological investigation carried out in the site the beach wells were allocated close to the shoreline to assure the pumping of seawater and not influence the groundwater aquifer. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> the four wells are located in one line parallel to the sea shoreline with a distance for 40 to 50 from the shoreline. The minimum distance between the wells is 40 m.</p><p>Well components such as the screen diameter and length, gravel pack, the location of</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Desalination plant and beach wells site layout [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref10">10</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x4.png"/></fig><p>the screen, the location of pump, etc. were determined based on the preliminary design report and the hydrogeological investigation carried out by UG consultant. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the description of the typical beach well that has the following characteristics:</p><p>1) The external diameter of the borehole is 20 inch.</p><p>2) The diameter of the screen is 14 inch, opening size is computed to retain 90% of the gravel pack, therefore, the opening size will range between 1 mm to 1.5 mm and the opening slot percentage is 35%.</p><p>3) The length of the screen is 15 m located in sand or coarse sand layer below the water table. Stainless steel screens are used. The screen is located below the water table with a distance equal to double the expected drawdown of the water table after pumping of 200 m<sup>3</sup>/hr. The shaft of the pump should be about between 8 m to 10 m below the groundwater table.</p><p>4) The total length of pump housing depends on the depth of the water table, the depth of permeable layers (sand aquifer) and the drawdown of the water table. The lithology indicates one layer of coarse sand (Kurkar) up to 45 m below the ground surface. The depth of the water level is 8 to 9 m below the ground surface. The beach wells screens are located inside the sand and kurkar layer. The exact depth of the screen will be designed considering maximum drawdown of the groundwater level. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the location of the screen of the well which will be located between 30 m and 45 m depth below the ground surface.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Modelling Approach</title><p>In order to study the impacts of beach wells on the aquifer, a prediction model, starting from the year 2000 until year 2040, was used to investigate the impacts of pumping from beach wells on the aquifer. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> presents the domain as a part of the coastal</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Beach well components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref10">10</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Groundwater model domain</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x6.png"/></fig><p>aquifer. Hence, the aquifer parameters were set as if they were in the transient model. The long term seasonal recharge rate for the summer and winter is considered to represent the seasonal differences in recharge through each year. In the projects area, the consultant does not find agricultural or monitoring wells which could be used a baseline for investigation the results of the model.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Impacts on Groundwater Quantity</title><p>Based on the tests carried out during the design of the beach wells, it was reported that the groundwater level in the beach wells area is 0.08 m (MSL) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72639-ref11">11</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the simulated groundwater level in the year 2015 before the operation of the STLV. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the groundwater levels in year 2016 where there is a drop of 4m of the groundwater in the beach well area. It seems that the drawdown in the beach well will become steady with the same amount after year 2022. This impact cannot be separated from the quality impacts. The steady four meter drawdown in the beach wells will force the flow from the eastern direction to the sea. This will have positive impacts on the aquifer since it will decrease the seawater intrusion to the aquifer.</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Groundwater level in year 2015</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Groundwater levels in year 2016</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x8.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Impacts on Groundwater Quality</title><p>The groundwater quality of an existing agriculture well (around 600 m in the eastern direction of the beach wells) was tested by the consultant. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the results of the water quality in this well. It can be seen that TDS is high which can be used as a baseline for monitoring the operation of the beach wells and how the beach wells can influence the groundwater quality. In addition these results can be used to check the groundwater quality modeling simulation and prediction as presented hereafter.</p><p>In order to study which part of the aquifer that will be directly influenced by the abstraction of sweater through the beach wells and to verify that the wells will continue abstracting sea water, transport due to advection-dispersion, density dependent flow SEAWAT module simulation has been performed using a pollution tracer which was considered as Chloride. The model also used to test the impacts of the beach wells on the aquifer water quality.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the simulated Cl concentration in years 2015 before the operation of the beach wells. The beach wells will be operated in year 2016. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows also that the Cl concentration 40 m from the sea shoreline has a concentration of 19,000 mg/l. This means the wells are abstracting seawater and do not abstract groundwater.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> presented that the 3 beach wells will continue pumping of seawater with Cl concentration of 19,000 mg/l. This proves that there will be positive impacts on the aquifer since the beach wells will continue abstracting seawater and are not abstracting groundwater.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Groundwater quality of existing agricultural wells close to the beach wells</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value (mg/l)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14,000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7270</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Simulated Cl concentration contours in year 2015</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x9.png"/></fig><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 shows the predicted Cl concentration contours in year 2030 and, where, the beach wells will pump water with Cl concentration equal to 18,000 mg/l. This means that the beach wells will accelerate the flow from the aquifer to the sea direction but still the pumped water is considered as seawater. This indicates the positive impacts on the groundwater aquifer since it will decrease and stop the seawater intrusion in the beach wells area (Gaza Strip Middle area).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 presents the Cl concentration in aquifer cross section (Cl concentration varies depth) passing through the beach wells perpendicular to the sea and in year 2022. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 verify that screen of the beach wells which is located 45 m below the ground surface will pump water with Cl concentration of 19,000 mg/l. Incase if the screen is deeper than 45, the Cl concentration will increase to reach 20,000 mg/l. Therefore, to increase the possibility of pumping sweater and reduce the impacts on the aquifer, it is recommended that the screen should be as deep as possible. The depth should be in the range of 50 m to 60 m.</p><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Predicted Cl concentration contours in year 2022</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Predicted Cl concentration contours in year 2030</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x11.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Groundwater Aquifer Monitoring</title><p>For small scale RO plants like the one in consideration of this study, beach wells were recommended for the intake. To assure the protection of the groundwater aquifer from any negative consequences due to pumping, it is very important to regularly monitor (monthly) the groundwater quantity (groundwater level) and quality (EC/TDS). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 shows the location of the proposed monitoring points.</p><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Predicted Cl concentration contours varies the depths of the aquifer (aquifer layers) in year 2022</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Groundwater monitoring points</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170316x13.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The modelling approach used in this study showed that the location and the distribution of the beach wells are appropriate for the small size desalination plant intake. The article presented that the current distribution of the beach wells will have positive impacts on the Gaza Strip aquifer. The beach well will form a barrier for the seawater intrusion to the aquifer. However, for another case where the design criteria of the desalination intake will be changed, the impacts will completely be different. The essential criteria are the number of the wells, the distance between the wells, the well abstraction, the distance of the beach wells from the sea shoreline and the groundwater aquifer characteristics. This small desalination plant is of great importance for Gaza Strip, to face the population increase and the lack of clean and drinkable water resources in Gaza Strip. On other hand, these small desalination plants can enhance the groundwater quality in terms of reducing the seawater intrusion in Gaza Strip aquifer. The modelling approach is recommended to be used in investigating the impacts of future small scale desalination plants in Gaza Strip.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mogheir, Y. (2016) Assessing the Seawater Intrusion Due to Beach Wells in the Desalination Plant. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 4, 37-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.412003</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72639-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S.A.A. (2002) Geotechnical Investigations for Gaza Desalination Plant Proposed Project Site. S.A.A. Geotechnical Engineering, Gaza.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UG and Arterlia Consultants (2013) Preliminary Design for Short-Term Low Volume (STLV) Sea Water Desalination for Southern Governorates of Gaza Strip.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Werner, A.D., Bakkerd, M., Post, V.E.A., Vandenbohede, A., Lu, C., Ataie-Ashtiani, B., Simmons, C.T. and Barry, D.A. (2013) Seawater Intrusion Processes, Investigation and Management: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Langevin, C.D., Thorne, D.T., Dausman, A.M., Sukop, M.C. and Guo, W. (2007) SEAWAT Version4: A Computer Program for Simulation of Multi-Species Solute and Heat Transport. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 6. US Geological Survey; Reston, 40 p [Chapter A22].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mogheir, Y., Foul, A., Abuhabib, A. and Mohammad, A. (2013) Assessment of Large Scale Brackish Water Desalination Plants in the Gaza Strip. Desalination, 314, 96-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EMCC (2012) Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for Gaza Water Supply and Sewage System Improvements. EMCC, Gaza, Palestine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNEP (2009) Environmental Assessment of the Gaza Strip Following the Escalation of Hostilities in December 2008-January 2009. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UN (2012) United Nations Country Team in the oPt, Gaza in 2020: A Livable Place? http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/104094048-Gaza-in-2020-A-livable-place.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail M. (2003) Prospects of Water Desalination in the Gaza Strip. TRITA-LWR Master of Science Thesis, Stockholm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palestinian Water Authority (PWA) (2015) Water Resources Status Summary Report. PWA, Gaza, Palestine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72639-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CMWU (2015) CMWU Annual Report on Water Status in Gaza. Costal Municipalities Water Utility, Gaza, Palestine.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>