<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2016.412011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-72541</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Microscopic Structural Comparison between Epidermal Trichomes in Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. and Blumea laciniata (Roxb.) DC
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaolu</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yingbo</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuxin</surname><given-names>Pang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>Jiang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Germplasm Enhancement in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Danzhou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>10,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>25,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>2,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Immature leaves and stems, which were about one to three centimeters nearby the stem tips, of Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. (BB) and Blumea laciniata (Roxb.) DC. (BL) were cut into sections under ?18?C with a frozen section machine, and observed under an optical microscope. Results show that the most significant difference is that the BB has only one kind of glandular trichomes, while the BL has two. The glandular trichomes found on BB terms were all short glandular hairs (SGH), which were not longer than 100 μm. On BL stems, besides the SGH, the long glandular hairs (LGH), which were longer than 200 μm, were also found. By the factors pointed out in present study, the BB and BL and be distinguished from each other. 
   
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Blumea balsamifera</kwd><kwd> Blumea laciniata</kwd><kwd> Sambong</kwd><kwd> Ainaxiang</kwd><kwd> Glandular Hair</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. (BB) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref1">1</xref>] and Blumea laciniata (Roxb.) DC. (BL) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref2">2</xref>] are two medicinal plantsbelong to Blumea family, distribute in tropical and subtropical zones in Asia, including South China, and produce tiny seeds. They look similar, especially in their seedling stage, making them easily confused. Their seeds are small and also seem alike. The former is the only source of a frequently used traditional Chinese medicine named Aipian, and was of high economic value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref4">4</xref>]. The later, were less demanded in the mordent pharmaceutical market. Having mistakenly planted the wrong seedlings, folks and plantations usually experienced enormous loss. Frozen section technique is a valuable tool used to rapidly prepare slides from tissue for microscopic interpretation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref5">5</xref>]. It has been successfully practiced on observation of the morphological development of BB leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref6">6</xref>]. As a result, micro-examination is worth trying to add more information to help people tell them apart.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>BB and BL plants were both collected from outskirts Danzhou (Hainan, China), authenticated by Mr. Ying-Bo Zhang and Dr. Xiao-Lu Chen. Voucher specimens have been deposited at the Traditional Medicinal Plant Germplasm Nursery of South China, Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Hainan, China.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><p>・ Frozen section</p><p>Fresh and healthy immature leaves and stems about one to three centimeters nearby the stem tips were cut from the BB and BL plants. They were directly cut into 4 &#215; 4 mm or 5 mm long without fixed. Each pieces of tissues were embedding on a sample table with Jung tissue freezing medium (Leica, German) under −18˚C for 10 min, and then cut with Leica CM1900 under −18˚C. The thickness ranges from 10 μm to 30 μm. The sections were observed with a computer-equipped microscope.</p><p>・ Data collection and analysis</p><p>Lengths were measuring with a computer equipped microscope with an electronic scale. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out by using the SPSS 19.0 software. The results were expressed as mean &#177; SD (standard deviation). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests or the independent sample t-test using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Types of Epidermal Trichomes</title><p>Both BB and BL are covered by epidermal trichomes, including non-glandular and glandular hairs. Results showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> indicated that two types of trichomes were growing on the BB plant, while three were on BL plant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Length of Non-Glandular Hairs</title><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the lengths of non-glandular hairs on BB were usually longer than 500 μm, which were much shorter on BL plants, typically ranges from 100 μm to 500 μm. The lengths of non-glandular hairs in BB and BL were significantly different by the independent sample t-test at P &lt; 0.05 level.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Types of epidermal trichomes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. (BB)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Blumea laciniata (Roxb.) DC. (BL)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-glandular hairs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-glandular hairs</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >glandular capitate trichome (GCT)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >glandular peltate trichome (GPT)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Measurement of non-glandular hair Lengths (μm)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >BB (n = 12)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BL (n = 12)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >453.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1354.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >363.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1099.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >789.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >689.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1209.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1006.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >952.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >890.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1355.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >957.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >977.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.56</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Length of non-glandular hairs (μm, n = 12)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >BB</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.42 &#177; 203.64a*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263.91 &#177; 107.36b</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values are expressed as mean &#177; SD. Data followed by different letters are significantly different by the independent sample t-test at P &lt; 0.05 level.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Morphological Observation of Non-Glandular Hairs</title><p>The non-glandular hairs on BB leaf were lender (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(A)) and whose on BL leaf were shorter and thicker (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(B) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(C)). Both of them were composed of several cells arranged in a line. Though the “bell-like” shade was not obvious on BL leaf under stereomicroscope (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(B)), it can be recognized by performing Frozen section (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(C)).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Length of Glandular Hairs</title><p>The length of glandular hairs on BB and BL plants were found to be significantly different. The BB plants grows only SGH with a length of about 56 μm, while the BL plants growth two kinds of glandular hairs, with length of approximately 92 μm, and 257 μm, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Morphological observation of non-glandular hairs. (A) Non-glandular hairs on BB leaf; (B) Non-glandular hairs on BL leaf; (C) A non-glandular hair on BL leaf.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72541x2.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72541x3.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72541x4.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Measurement of glandular hairs (μm, n = 8)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >BB (GCT)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BL (GCT)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BL (GPT)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >207.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225.68</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Length of glandular hairs (μm, n = 8)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >BB (GCT)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BL (GCT)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BL (GPT)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.99 &#177; 10.58c*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.53 &#177; 23.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256.66 &#177; 36.38</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values are expressed as mean &#177; SD. Data in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different by Duncan’s test at P &lt; 0.05 level.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Morphological Observation of Glandular Hairs</title><p>On BB plants, a short glandular hair is comprises of a head with two columns of secretory cells, a short stalk with some smaller cells, and one or two basal cell(s) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(A)). In another word, it is a glandular capitate trichome. On BL plants, a short glandular hair is similar with the one on BB plant, except the stalk cells are larger (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(B)). The long glandular trichome on BL plant is a glandular peltate trichome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(C)), which did not found on BB plant. It was consists of a head with about tour to twenty secretory cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(D)), a long stalk with two to eight stalk cells, and one or two basal cell(s).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Frozen section has been wildly performed nowadays in animal and human researches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref7">7</xref>], but not so frequently on plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72541-ref8">8</xref>]. The main reason may be the cytoderm were</p><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Morphological observations of glandular hairs. (A) A glandular capitate trichome (GCT) on BB stem; (B) A glandular capitate trichome (GCT) on BL stem; (C) A glandular peltate trichome (GPT) on BL stem; (D) A head of a glandular peltate trichome (GPT). Bar = 100 μm.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72541x5.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72541x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72541x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72541x8.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>easily damaged in frozen section. However, this technology can be performed easily and quickly. Present study confirmed the discrimination of the plant of BB and BL is viable by performing frozen section and microscopic observation. These two seem similar plants, though may confused by farmer, could be easily tell apart through the methods and the factors reported in the research. The results showed may help people better discriminate the Blumea plants with high economic value and those do not.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by the Natural Science Fund of China “The relationship between the structure and development of glandular hairs and the accumulation of l-borneol in Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC.” (#81603245), and the Science and technology cooperation projects of Hainan Province, China “Tropical medicinal plants germplasm resources evaluation, protection, development and utilization” (#KJHZ2015-15).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Chen, X.L., Zhang, Y.B., Pang, Y.X. and Jiang, Q. (2016) Microscopic Structural Comparison between Epidermal Trichomes in Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. and Blumea laciniata (Roxb.) DC. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 4, 70- 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2016.412011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72541-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pang, Y.X., Wang, D., Fan, Z.W., Chen, X., Yu, F., Hu, X., et al. (2014) Blumea balsamifera—A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Re-view. Molecules, 19, 9453-9477. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19079453</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72541-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y., Ooi, L.S., Wang, H., But, P.P. and Ooi, V.E. (2004) Antiviral Activities of Medicinal Herbs Traditionally Used in Southern Mainland China. Phytother Res, 18, 718-722. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1518</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72541-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pang, Y.X., Fan, Z.W., Wang, D., Yang, Q., Wang, K., Chen, X.L., et al. (2014) External Application of the Volatile Oil from Blumea balsamifera May Be Safe for Liver—A Study on Its Chemical Composition and Hepatotoxicity. Molecules, 19, 18479-18492. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191118479</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72541-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pang, Y.X., Wang, D., Hu, X., Wang, H., Fu, W.J., Fan, Z.W., et al. (2014) Effect of Volatile Oil from Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC. Leaves on Wound Healing in Mice. J Tradit Chin Med, 6, 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6272(15)30087-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72541-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peters, S.R. (2010) A Practical Guide to Frozen Section Technique. Springer. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1234-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72541-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, L., Chen, X., Yang, Q. and Pang, Y. (2016) Morphological Development of Sambong (Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC.) Leaf Studied by Frozen Section and Thin Section. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 4, 10-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2016.44002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72541-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(1950) Freezing Section. Google Patents.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72541-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gahan, P.B., McLean, J., Kalina, M. and Sharma, W. (1967) Freezing-Sectioning of Plant Tissues 1. J Exp Bot, 18, 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/18.1.151</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>