<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2016.412008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-72443</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Correlation of Hospital Operational Efficiency and Average Length of Stay in China: A Study Based on Provincial Level Data
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xinyu</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yanan</surname><given-names>Guo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yaxuan</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bo</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yaogang</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>International College of Business and Technology, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>24,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Objective: To measure the hospital operation efficiency, study the correlation between average length of stay and hospital operation efficiency, analyze the importance of shortening average length of stay to the improvement of the hospital operation efficiency and put forward relevant policy suggestion. Methods: Based on China provincial panel data from 2003 to 2012, the hospital operation efficiencies are calculated using Super Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis model, and the correlation between average length of stay and hospital operation efficiency is tested using Spearman rank correlation coefficient test. Results: From 2003 to 2012, the average of national hospital operation efficiency was increasing slowly and the hospital operations were inefficient in most of the areas. The national hospital operation efficiency is negatively correlated to the average length of stay. Conclusion: Measures should be taken to set average length of stay in a scientific and reasonable way, improve social and economic benefits based on the improvement of efficiency. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Average Length of Stay</kwd><kwd> Hospital Operation Efficiency</kwd><kwd> Correlation</kwd><kwd> Super Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>At present, the key to solving the problem of the imbalance between supply and demand in the field of medical service is to improve the operational efficiency of the hospital, so as to effectively improve the capacity of medical and health services. Average length of stay has been considered as an important indicator in the assessment of medical care and health service performance. Average length of stay (ALOS) refers to average number of days staying in hospital for every inpatient within a certain period of time (usually one year). Various measures have been taken to reduce average length of stay to improve medical care and health service efficiency in different countries. To reasonably shorten the average length of stay is of great significance in easing the pressure on medical beds and optimizing the allocation of health resources because it will not only alleviate the medical expenditure burden on patients, but will also expand the patient reception capacity for hospitals, thus contributing to the improvement of social welfare and economic benefits. The existing literatures focus more on measuring the hospital efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72443-ref1">1</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72443-ref4">4</xref>]. Some other the previous studies studied the length of stay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72443-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72443-ref6">6</xref>]. However, much less attention has been paid to the relationship between operational efficiency and average length of stay in hospital. This paper quantitatively investigates the relationship between average length of day and operational efficiency in hospital in order to provide feasible policy reference for the optimization of hospital medical resource allocation in China.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Data and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Data Sources</title><p>The data used in this paper is extracted from the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) database (2004-2013), and China Health Statistical Yearbook (2004-2013). According to the statistical caliber of China health Statistical Yearbook, the term “hospital” in this paper refers to general hospital, hospital of traditional Chinese medicine, integrated hospital of traditional Chinese and western medicine, national hospital, and all kinds of specialized hospitals and nursing homes, but not includes specialized disease control center, maternal and child care service center and convalescent hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Research Method</title><p>First, this paper analyzes the changing trends of average length of stay in different countries including the United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Chile from 2003 to 2012. Second, this paper uses the Super-Efficiency DEA model and selects the data of the number of hospitals, hospital medical beds and the number of health person- nel in 31 provinces of China from 2003 to 2012 as input variables, and chooses hos- pital visits of outpatient and emergency department, number of inpatients, number of discharged patients, and the number of surgeries of hospital inpatients as output variables. Use these methods and data, this paper measures the hospital operational efficiency in each province and studies the correlation between efficiency and average length of stay.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Comparative Analysis of Length of Stay among Domestic and Foreign Hospitals</title><p>Average length of stay of the discharged inpatients from hospital is an indicator reflecting the hospital operational efficiency and service performance. The decrease of average hospital length of stay indicates the improvement of the comprehensive efficiency of the hospital. Shortening average length of stay within reasonable limits will not only reduce the medical expenditure burden on patients, but will also improve the utilization rate of hospital medical bed so as to meet medical health needs of more patients.</p><p>As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, from 2003 to 2012, there exists a declining trend in the average lengths of stay of the discharged inpatients from hospital in five countries. In China, the average length of stay declines from 11 days to 10 days. Although the declining degree is moderate for those countries, the general trend is the decrease of average length of stay annually, which indicates that each of the countries is actively optimizing resource utilization to improve efficiency and reduce the average length of stay as much and reasonable as possible. The largest decline happens in the United Kingdom , a reduction of 2.4 days. Although has been decreased, the average length of stay in China is still the largest in the five countries.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Measurement of Hospital Operational Efficiency in China</title><p>Using Super-Efficiency DEA model, the hospital operational efficiencies of 31 provinces in China from 2003 to 2012 are calculated. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Due to space limitation, only the values of hospital operational efficiencies of 31 provinces in 2003 and 2012, and 10-year average efficiencies are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. As can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, based on the comparison of provincial hospital operational</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Average length of stay of the discharged inpatients from hospital in five countries from 2003-2012</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/72443x3.png"/></fig><p>efficiencies between 2003 and 2012, the efficiencies in only 6 provinces are improved. From the perspective of 10-year average efficiencies, the hospitals only 5 provinces are generally in efficient status.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Normality Test of Hospital Operational Efficiency and Average Length of Stay</title><p>Based on the result of single sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Hospital operational efficiencies in 31 provinces of China</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Province</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2012</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003-2012 average</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Province</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2012</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003-2012 average</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6546</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hubei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8783</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7506</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9604</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tianjin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hunan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9205</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hebei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8544</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7870</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8846</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guangdong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3663</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2667</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanxi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5822</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guangxi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9297</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9602</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inner Mongolia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6717</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hainan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8132</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liaoning</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chongqing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8953</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9079</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jilin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6392</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sichuan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heilongjiang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6599</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6691</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guizhou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9169</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3624</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yunnan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8653</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0404</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jiangsu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8742</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tibet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6149</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zhejiang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1422</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0564</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shaanxi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6527</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7694</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anhui</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gansu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7670</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fujian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1036</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0934</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qinghai</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7646</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jiangxi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ningxia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7702</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8111</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shandong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xinjiang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9248</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Henan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7905</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8568</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALOS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Efficiency</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Normal parameters<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8826</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8755</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18474</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Most extreme differences</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.093</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.093</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.044</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.636</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Test distribution is normal.</p><p>p-values of hospital operational efficiency and average length of stay are both smaller than 0.05, which means that both of the data arrays don’t obey normal distribution. Therefore, it is necessary to use Spearman rank correlation coefficient to test the correlations between hospital operational efficiency and average length of stay.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Correlation Analysis of Hospital Operational Efficiency and Average Length of Stay</title><p>Using Spearman rank correlation coefficient, the correlation of hospital operational efficiency and average length of stay is tested. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. From the table, it is clear that there exists significant negative correlation between hospital operational efficiency and average length of stay, which means that the shortening of average length of stay could significantly improve the hospital operational efficiency in China .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussions</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Shrink the Difference of Average Length of Stay between China and Other Countries</title><p>Through comparison it is clear that even if health resources are relatively abundant, the average length of stay in each country should be reduced to optimize the utilization efficiency of the medical bed, so as to maximize the utilization of limited resources to meet the needs of patients. The main reasons to the differences of average length of stay across different countries mainly due to the following three aspects: 1) the wasting of relatively scarce medical care and health service resources; 2) Shortage of nursing personnel; 3) Inadequate primary medical care system.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Reasonably Set Average Length of Stay to Improve the Social and Economic Benefits by Efficiency Improvement</title><p>The results show that Chinese hospital operating efficiency and the average length of stay were significantly negatively correlated. Shortening the average length of stay will help patients get timely treatment, reduce the chance of repeated infection and reduce the medical expense burdens on patients, facilitate more reasonable resource configuration, and accelerate the turnover rate of hospital medical beds, so as to increase the</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation test results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALOS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Efficiency</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >ALOS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.336<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Efficiency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.336<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>number of visits and further enhance medical income. In the mean time, the social and economic benefits of hospital could be improved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72443-ref7">7</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Shorten the Ineffective Length of Stay, and Improve the Hospital Operational Efficiency</title><p>In order to shorten the average length of stay, it is important to reduce the ineffective length of stay in the hospital which not only increases the economic burden on patients and their families, but also wastes scarce medical resources and reduces medical income of hospitals. Therefore, in order to improve hospital operational efficiency and shorten average length of stay, it is of great importance to sharply reduce or erase ineffective length of stay, which requires the improvement of management level and medical skill and technology levels, together with the cooperation and coordination among inpatient department and other hospital departments, and the active involvement of every health technical personnel. At the same time, two-way referral mechanism should be further improved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72443-ref8">8</xref>], which requires that the hospital inpatients in rehabilitation period and inpatients with chronic disease should be discharged in time or transferred to primary health service center to receive follow-up rehabilitation treatment.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Funding</title><p>This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 71273187] and National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 71473175].</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Liu, Q., Zhang, X.Y., Guo, Y.N., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y.X., Li, B. and Wang, Y.G. (2016) The Correlation of Hospital Operational Efficiency and Average Length of Stay in China: A Study Based on Provincial Level Data. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 4, 49-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2016.412008</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72443-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pan, J.X., Wang, X.W. and Li, J. (2014) Empirical Analysis on the Efficiency of Second Level Hospital and the Influencing Factors: Based on the Investigation Analysis of 14 General Hospitals of a Region. Chinese Health Economics, 33, 84-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72443-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mao, Y.N., Wang, X.W., Feng, R.H. and Cui, Y.Y. (2015) Study on Screening Hospital Efficiency Evaluation Index Based on DEA. Health Economics Research, 8, 15-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72443-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saronga, H.P., Duysburgh, E., Massawe, S., Dalaba, M.A., Savadogo, G., Tonchev, P., et al. (2014) Efficiency of Antenatal Care and Childbirth Services in Selected Primary Health Care Facilities in Rural Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-96</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72443-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X., Zhao, L., Cui, Z. and Wang, Y. (2015) Study on Equity and Efficiency of Health Resources and Services Based on Key Indicators in China. PLoS ONE, 10, e0144809.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144809</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72443-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Subbe, C.P., Kellett, J., Whitaker, C.J., et al. (2014) A Pragmatic Triage System to Reduce Length of Stay in Medical Emergency Admission: Feasibility Study and Health Economic Analysis. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 25, 815-820.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2014.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72443-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiao, Q., Wu, X.M., Zhou, W.G., Yang, R.C., Chen, H.X., Ji, AD. and Xiao, Y.H. (2015) Correlation Analysis of Hospitalization Cost and Length of Hospital Stay among Urban and Rural Medicare-Insured and -Participating Res-idents. Modern Preventive Medicine, 42, 652-654.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72443-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y.W. (2014) Discussion on the Method of Shortening Average Length of Stay. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Management, 2, 295-296.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-014-0295-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72443-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yi, L.H., Huang, P., Jiang, S.Q., Hao, A.M., Zhao, X., Qu, S., Han, Z.J., Xing, M., Ding, L.H., Lin, J., Xu, X.Z. and Yang, X.L. (2015) Analysis on the Two-Way Referral by Leading Hospitals of Three Health Alliances. Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration, 31, 253-257.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>