<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Enzyme Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2328-4846</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aer.2016.44011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AER-72416</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Enzymes of Earthworm as Indicators of Pesticide Pollution in Soil
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rishikesh</surname><given-names>K. Tiwari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shikha</surname><given-names>Singh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ravi</surname><given-names>S. Pandey</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bechan</surname><given-names>Sharma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biochemistry, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Zoology, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>bechanshaarma@gmail.com(BS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>124</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>27,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The importance of the earthworms in the agricultural practices is well known. The increasing applications of pesticides and chemicals in the agricultural farms have adversely influenced the flora and fauna of the soil. Earthworms which immensely contribute in increasing the quality and fertility of agricultural soil are reported be worst hit organisms under such conditions. Recent reports have indicated growing interests among researchers to explore biochemical and molecular markers as indicators of accumulation of pollutants in the soil in general and pesticides in particular. The varying levels of several biomolecules in different parts of the earthworm have been reported which are indicative of sensitivity of the organisms to different xenobiotics. However, the existing information lacks the literature displaying stock of information regarding the impact of pesticides on the levels of some key enzymes regulating many crucial functions in the earthworm at one place. Keeping in view this issue, it was envisaged to bring out a mini review which illustrates updated information available on the impact of pesticides on the activities of certain key enzymes reported to be responsible for catalysing metabolic pathways concerning the neurotransmission system, energy metabolism, oxidative stress and amino acids metabolism in different body parts of the earthworms, a prospective bioindicators of pesticides contamination in the soil.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Earthworms</kwd><kwd> Pesticides</kwd><kwd> Biomarkers</kwd><kwd> Enzymes</kwd><kwd> Oxidative Stress</kwd><kwd> Neurotransmission System</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is of utmost importance to understand as how to achieve sustainable agriculture by knowing the impact of various contaminants in the soil as well as of different agricul- tural practices on soil ecosystems as such [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref1">1</xref>] . Now-a-days, the chemical compounds such as pesticides and fertilizers are frequently used and its excess use leads to soil, sur- face and ground water pollution that affect target organisms along with non-target or- ganisms like earthworms. Earthworms are frequently available in a broad range of soil and may deposit 60% - 80% of the total soil biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref3">3</xref>] . They are the indispensable species in the terrestrial ecosystem which significantly influence the various processes like soil formation, organic matter breakdown, decomposition activity and nutrient cy- cling mineralization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>The frequent applications of pesticides have been found to exert adverse effects on the soil development and its functioning in an ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref5">5</xref>] . Earthworms act as bioindicator species for the ecotoxicological analysis of pesticide soil pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref8">8</xref>] . According to a report, pesticides have detrimental effects on earthworm at various levels of organisation which involves change in the behaviour, defile metabolism and enzymatic functioning, enhance mortality, diminish fertility, hamper growth and reproduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref9">9</xref>] . In past and even recently, various reviews have been published on the toxic effects of pesticides on the earthworms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>A biomarker has been defined as a biochemical, cellular, physiological or behavioural alterations that can be evaluated through a portion of tissue or fluid samples or whole individual, for the assessment of exposure and/or impact from one or more toxicants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref12">12</xref>] . The biochemical biomarkers are being utilized these days for the analysis of pollutant toxicity, metabolization and detoxification in earthworm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref14">14</xref>] which later can be used for the detection and assessment of contaminant that influence the environmental modifications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Biomarkers render evidence for the exposure or effect of pollutants on the fauna of soil which can be utilized for the assessment of pollution in environmental monitoring. Selection of biomarker is done on the basis of various criteria whether it is sensitive, acts in a dose-time dependent manner to the toxicant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref16">16</xref>] , its biochemical memory and whether its erratic response due to natural variation is known that includes temperature, sex, age, weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Earthworms play crucial role in soil ecosystem as it helps in maintaining soil structure and fertility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref4">4</xref>] . They influence the organic matter dynamics, structure and microbial community [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref20">20</xref>] and hence are referred as Ecosystem engineers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref21">21</xref>] . It has also been explained as how they enhance the soil porosity by modifying soil organic matter chemically as well as physically by mixing leaf litter with soil resulting in formation and stabilization of soil aggregates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref23">23</xref>] . Keeping in view the lack of information on the effect of xenobiotics on different biochemical and molecular indices of the earthworm, it has been endeavoured in the this mini review to present an updated information on the impact of pesticides and other xenobiotics on the enzymes from earthworms which could be of great use to those involved in soil remediation and sustainable agriculture.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Enzymes as Biomarkers in Earthworm</title><p>The utility of biomarkers in earthworm is gradually relevant for the assessment of impact of pesticide in soil organism. Various classes of enzymes are used as biomarkers due to their crucial role in the neurocholinergic transmission and in cell homeostasis preventing toxic action of chemicals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref26">26</xref>] . Dimethoate, an organophosphate pesticide, has been reported to exert toxic effects on the profiles of protein and the cellular enzyme system as well as the testicular histomorphology of Eisenia kinneari [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Acetylcholinesterase in Earthworms</title><p>Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is considered as the main cholinesterase in earthworms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref31">31</xref>] . In few earthworm species, its activity is reported and biochemically characterised [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref32">32</xref>] . It is a significant enzyme that play crucial role in the transmission mecha- nism of nervous system. The neurotransmission takes place at cholinergic synapses by rapid hydrolysis of acetylcholine (neurotransmitter) to choline and acetate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref33">33</xref>] . Or- ganophosphorus and carbamate pesticides mainly inhibit AChE. Pesticide particularly, organophosphorus inhibit the acitivity of enzyme by covalently phosphorylating the serine residue within the active site group.</p><p>It has been reported that the concentration of AChE activity was highest in the pre- clitellar part of earthworm and has important role in the functioning of dorsal brain present near prostomium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref34">34</xref>] . A time-dependent inhibition of AChE is found in Eisenia fetida, when exposed to two organophosphates, chlorpyriphos and azodrin, in the standardized paper contact test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref36">36</xref>] . The exposure of Eisenia fetida to carbamate pesticide, methiocarb, has been demonstrated to cause strong inhibition of AChE activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref38">38</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Gamma Amino Butyric Acid (GABA) Amino Tranferase</title><p>The GABA is a universal inhibitory neuromuscular transmitter in most of the invertebrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref39">39</xref>] . The site of action of this neurotransmitter is at both the neuromuscular junctions and within the ganglia. It is known that the major target of cypermethrin, class II-pyrethroids, is GABA that regulates the chloride channels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref40">40</xref>] . According to a report, the open state of voltage gated chloride channels is suppressed and GABA de- pendent uptake of chloride ions is inhibited by cypermethrin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref41">41</xref>] . This pesticide leads to generate neurotoxicity by modulating the levels of GABA. The results of a recent study have shown that this pesticide results into reduction in the GABA level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref42">42</xref>] , which indicates that GABA may act as a sensitive biomarker to cypermethrin exposure in earthworms. The effect of cypermerthrin in brain of earthworm has been shown to be mediated via inhibition of activity of AChE involved in cholinergic neurotransmis- sion system.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Antioxidant Enzymes</title><p>The exposure to pesticides induces oxidative stress through generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref43">43</xref>] . The production of ROS leading to oxidative stress has gained importance and has generated great interest in the field of ecotoxicology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref44">44</xref>] . Oxidative stress may be defined as the imbalance between the oxidative as well as the antioxidative indices in the living systems. Interaction of these ROS with the essential macromolecules such as DNA, protein and lipids may cause disturbance in the physiological processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref45">45</xref>] . Toxicity induced by pesticides involves lipid peroxidation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref46">46</xref>] . The treatment of earthworms with the pesticides and heavy metals leads to the production of ROS (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880083x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and OH<sup>−</sup> radicals) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref47">47</xref>] . The cells are known to defend themselves from the oxidative damage using antioxidative enzymes and glutathione as they act as scavengers of ROS. The major enzymatic antioxidants in response to oxidative stress are: SOD, as catalase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase. In order to prevent the oxidative damage, SOD metabolizes the superoxide anion (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880083x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) into mo- lecular oxygen and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, which is then deactivated by catalase. In cellular protection, glutathione reductase plays key role by reducing glutathione in the oxidised form (GSSG) to GSH (reduced and active form) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref48">48</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Glutathione-S-Transferase (GST)</title><p>Glutathione-S-Transferase (GST), a cytosolic enzyme, plays a crucial role in the detoxification and biotransformation of a number of electrophilic compounds by consumption of glutathione. The exposure of pesticides may lead to the alterations in the enzymatic activities that reflects the metabolic disturbances and cell damage in the specific tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref49">49</xref>] . Increased level of GST may result into better protection against toxic effects of pesticides and hence can be used as biomarker for monitoring pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref50">50</xref>] . GSTs neutralise a wide range of pesticides and endogenous metabolic by-products through enzymatic f glutathione conjugation, glutathione-dependent peroxidase activity or isomerisation reactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref51">51</xref>] . The reports from different workers have shown the sensitivity of earthworm GST to the heavy metals and the pesticide exposure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref56">56</xref>] . Earthworm, Lumbricus rubellus, possess a range of GSTs related to those from other taxa like nematodes and humans, with the evidence of tissue specific isoforms, activity, location, the ability to detoxify products of cellular toxicity and potential response to pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref57">57</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Gut Enzymes of Earthworm</title><p>The existing information indicate that the microflora dwelling in the gut of the earthworm and the enzymes present there in such as cellulase, amylase, endoglucanase, pectinase, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and nitrate reductase have the ability to degrade the complex organic molecules (cellulose, pectin, etc.) in soil to their relatively simpler forms. Exposure of worms to deltamethrin causes reduction in cellulase activity, while exposures to lindane increased its activity. These results indicate the harmful effect of deltamethrin and the inducing effects of lindane on the biochemical metabolism of earthworms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref58">58</xref>] . The acute exposure with these two pesticides, however, has been found to be lethal to the earthworms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref58">58</xref>] . The presence of high activity of cellulase in the posterior region of the gut of the earthworms helps in digestion of complex plant carbohydrates and generation of energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref59">59</xref>] . Assays of the enzymes amylase, cellulase, invertase and pectinase from the gut of E. eugeniae revealed that their production was reduced in the fipronil mixed with soil as compared to that of control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref60">60</xref>] . The carboxylesterases (CbEs) are serine hydrolases and they are involved in the detoxi- fication of complex organic materials in soil. The CbE is secreted by earthworm in their gut lumen. In Lumbricus terrestris, chlorpyrifos (OP) has been shown to significantly inhibit the CbE activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref61">61</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Enzymes of Carbohydrate Metabolism in Earthworms</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)</title><p>The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a key glycolytic enzyme that is found in almost all the tissues of the earthworms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref63">63</xref>] . This enzyme has been used as an indicator of exposure to stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref64">64</xref>] . To assess toxicity of any xenobiotics including the pesticides and the heavy metals as well as the diagnosis of cell, tissue and organ damage, LDH has been widely exploited in the vertebrates. However, in the invertebrate toxicity tests, the potential of this enzyme as indicator is rarely explored [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref65">65</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref66">66</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref67">67</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Malate Dehydrogenase (MDH)</title><p>Malate is formed when cytosolic NADH is oxidised during reduction of oxaloacetate by the action of cytosolic MDH. Then, malate enters mitochondria by a carrier and is oxi- dised into oxaloacetate by the action of mitochondrial MDH. Malate is an important intermediate of TCA cycle. MDH catalyzes the interconversion of oxaloacetate to malate for energy requirements. In the present study, elevated levels of malate are ob- served in earthworms exposed to cypermethrin, in comparison to control earthworms. It may be due to the high energy requirement of earthworms under stress conditions caused by cypermethrin exposure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref42">42</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Enzymes of Amino Acid Metabolism in Earthworms</title><p>Exposure of deltamethrin in Metaphire posthuma has been shown to affect the glucose and nitrogen metabolism pathway by inhibition of chief enzymes involved in the pathway: glutamine synthatase, glutamic acid decarboxylase, Acyl CoA synthase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref42">42</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72416-formula10"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880083x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Scheme 1. A flow chart showing effect of soil pollutants on biochemical indices of the earthworms.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Enzymes of earthworms as biomarkers of pesticide toxicity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species of earthworm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pesticide</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Biomarker</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effect</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aporrectodea caliginosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorpyrifos and azinophos-methyl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibition of cholinesterase (ChE)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref14">14</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia andrei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbaryl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibition of ChE observed even at lowest dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref68">68</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aporrectodea caliginosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In juvenile, ChE activity was inhibited when exposed to 12 (75% inhibition) and 60 (90%) mg/kg of Diazinon. ChE depression of 35% and 70% was observed w. r. t. control when exposed to 4 and 28 mg/kg, respectively</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref69">69</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monocrotophos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AChE inhibition was observed Dose-dependent. AChE activity co-related with morphological damage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref70">70</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia andrei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbaryl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dose-dependent AChE activity was observed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref71">71</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drawida willsi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Butachlor, Malathion and Carbofuran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >When exposed to butachlor, no variation of AChE activity; on malathion exposure, maximum AChE inhibition (41% and 46%) after 9d and after 12d (54% and 62.9%) of carbofuran exposure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref72">72</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pheretima peguana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorpyrifos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AChE acitivity is significantly inhibited (&gt;60%) at two concentrations of pesticide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref73">73</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. fetida andrei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Benzo (a) pyrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Increase in AChE acitivity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref74">74</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbofuran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TChE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein content and total cholinesterase activity increased in low level and vice-versa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref75">75</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atrazine and chlorotoluron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SOD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorotoluron is less toxic to atrazine. Synergistic effect observed when combined.SOD activity is enhanced.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref76">76</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbofuran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SOD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >When pesticide concentration is increased, SOD is reduced and vice-versa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref75">75</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorpyrifos and fenvalerate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SOD, Cellulase and CAT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibition of SOD and cellulase whereas CAT activity increased first and then decreased.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref77">77</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fomesafen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidative stress and peroxidation not found even at low dose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref78">78</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imidacloprid, acetamiprid, nitenpyram, clothianidin and thiacloprid Carbaryl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cellulase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inhibition of cellulose activity; damage epidermal and midgut cells</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref79">79</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia fetida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catalase LP and LPI Total GSH % GSSG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depression of enzyme GST activity was observed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref68">68</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. fetida andrei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Benzo (a) pyrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catalase GST LP and LPI Total GSH % GSSG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Increase in lipid peroxidation and enzyme activities. ROS involved inpesticide exposure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref74">74</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lumbricus rubellus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pyrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catalase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >When exposed to 160 and 640 mg/kg of pyrene, catalase activity was lowered.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref80">80</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eisenia kinneari</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dimethoate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profound changes in testis was found due to disturbance in cellular acitivty</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref81">81</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72416-ref82">82</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The list of different enzymes responding to the pesticide stress in the earthworms have been summarised in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. A flow chart showing effect of soil pollutants on varying biochemical indices of the earthworms is displayed in Scheme 1.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>There is growing interest on the studies concerning to monitoring or evaluation of the impact of pesticides and heavy metals on the activities of some key enzymes from different tissues in the earthworms to exploit them as potential indicators of xenobiotics contamination in the soil. The information available regarding the impact of pesticides on different species of earthworm indicated that the pesticide induced alterations in the functions of some key enzymes regulating the neurotransmission system, energy me- tabolism, oxidative system and amino acid metabolism of the worm. It was observed</p><p>that these enzymes could serve as potential indicators of pesticide toxicity. However, still lot more is required to be done to find out more sensitive biomarkers from the earthworms to be used as specific indicator of the soil pollutants. The information may help farmers as well as the policy makers to formulate and manage better farming practices avoiding excess soil contamination with pesticides as it may significantly reduce</p><p>the earthworm population in soil.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tiwari, R.K., Singh, S., Pandey, R.S. and Sharma, B. (2016) Enzymes of Earthworm as Indicators of Pesticide Pollution in Soil. Advances in Enzyme Research, 4, 113-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aer.2016.44011</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72416-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonte, S. J., Winsome, T. and Six, J. (2009) Earthworm Populations in Relation to Soil Organic Matter Dynamics and Management in California Tomato Cropping Systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 41, 206-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.10.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, Y., Zang, Y., Zhong, Y. and Kong, Z. (1999) Toxicological Study of Two Pesticides on Earthworm Eisenia foetida. Chemosphere, 39, 2437-2356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00142-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sizmur, T. and Hodson, M.E. (2009) Do Earthworms Impact Metal Mobility and Availability in Soil? A Review. Environmental Pollution, 157, 1981-1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.02.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bartlett, M.D., Briones, M.J.I., Neilson, R., Schmidt, O., Spurgeon, D. and Creamer, R.E. (2010) A Critical Review of Current Methods in Earthworm Ecology: From Individuals to Populations. European Journal of Soil Biology, 46, 67-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.11.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rombke, J.J., Rombke, S. and Didden, W. (2005) The Use of Earthworms in Ecological Soil Classification and Assessment Concepts. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62, 249-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belanger, D. (2009) Utilisation de la faune macrobenthique comme bioindicateur de la qualite de l’environment marin cotier, Sherbrooke (ed.), Quebec.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calisi, A., Zaccarelli, N., Lionetto, M.G. and Schettino, T. (2013) Integrated Biomarker Analysis in the Earthworm Lumbricus terrestris: Application to the Monitoring of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution. Chemosphere, 90, 2637-2644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schreck, E., Geret, F., Gontier, L. and Treilhou, M. (2008) Neurotoxic Effect and Metabolic Responses Induced by a Mixture of Six Pesticides on Earthworm Aporrectodea Caliginosa nocturna. Chemosphere, 71, 1832-1893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pelosi, C., Joimel, S. and Makowski, D. (2013) Searching for a More Sensitive Earthworm Species to be Used in Pesticide Homologation Tests—A Meta-Analysis. Chemosphere, 90, 895-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Booth, L.H., Happelthwaite, V.J. and O’hallaron, K. (2000) Growth, Development and Fecundity of the Earthworm Aporrectodea calignosa after Exposure to Two Organophosphates. New Zealand Plant Protection, 53, 221-225.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandey, S. and Singh, D.K. (2004) Total Bacterial and Fungal Population after Chlorpyrifos and Quinalphos Treatments in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Soil. Chemosphere, 55, 197-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Depledge, M.H. (1994) The Rational Basis for the Use of Biomarkers as Ecotoxicological tools. In: Fossi, M.C. and Leonzio, C., Eds., Nondestructive Biomarkers in Vertebrates, Lewis Publisher, Boca Raton, 271-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Denoyelle, R., Rault, M., Mazzia, C., Mascle, O. and Capowiez, Y. (2007) Cholinesterase Activity as a Biomarker of Pesticide Exposure in Allobophora chlorotica Earthworms Living in Apple Orchards under Different Management Strategies. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 26, 2644-2649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/06-355.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reinecke, S.A. and Reinecke, A.J. (2007) The Impact of Organophosphate Pesticides in Orchards on Earthworms in the Western Cape, South Africa. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 66, 244-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.10.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gastaldi, L., hankard, P., Peres, G., canesi, L., Viarengo, A. and Pons, G. (2007) Application of a Biomarker Battery for the Evaluation of the Sublethal Effects of Pollutants in the Earthworm Eisenia andrei. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C, 146,398-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.04.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Walker</surname><given-names> C.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1998</year>)<article-title>Biomarker Strategies to Evaluate the Environmental Effects of Chemicals</article-title><source> Environmental Health Perspectives</source><volume> 106</volume>,<fpage> 613</fpage>-<lpage>620</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hagger, J.A., Jones, M.B., Leonard, D.L.P., Owen, R. and Galloway, T.S. (2006) Biomarkers and Integrated Environmental Risk Assessment: Are There More Questions Than Answers? Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2, 312-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.5630020403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edwards, C.A. and Bohlen, P.J. (1996) Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. 3rd Edition, Chapman &amp; Hall, London</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fragoso, C., Brown, G.G., Patron, J.C., Blanchart, E., Lavelle, P., Pashanasi, B., Senapati, B. and Kumar, T. (1997) Agricultural Intensification, Soil Biodiversity and Agroesystem Function in the Tropics: The Role of Earthworms. Applied Soil Ecology, 6, 17-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(96)00154-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sims, R.W. and Gerard, B.M. (1999) Earthworms. FSC Publications, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. and Shachak M. (1994) Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers. Oikos, 69, 373-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545850</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lavelle, P. and Spain, A.V. (2001) Soil Ecology. Kluwer Scientific, Amsterdam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pelosi, C., Barot, S., Capowiez, Y., Hedde, M. and Vandenbulcke, F. (2014) Pesticides and Earthworms. A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 199-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0151-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sanchez-Hernandez, J.C. (2006) Earthworms Biomarkers in Ecological Risk Assessment. In; Ware, G.W., et al., Eds., Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Springer, New York, 85-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32964-2_3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Novais, S.C., Gomes, S.I.L., Gravato, C., Guilhermino, L., De Coen, W., Soares, A.M.V.M. and Amorim, M.J.B. (2011) Reproduction and Biochemical Responses in Enchytraeus albidus (Oligochaeta) to Zinc or Cadmium Exposures. Environmental Pollution, 159, 1836-1843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.03.031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mekhalia, M.N., Tine, S., Menasria, T., Amieur, H. and Salhi, H. (2016) In Vitro Biomarker Responses of Earthworm Lumbricus terrestris Exposed to Herbicide Sekator and Phosphate Fertilizer. Water, Air, &amp; Soil Pollution, 227, 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2712-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lakhani, L., Khatri, A. and Choudhary, P. (2012) Effect of Dimethoate on Testicular Histomorphology of the Earthworm Eudichogaster kinneari (Stephenson). International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 1, 77-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mosleh, Y.Y., Paris-Palacios, S., Couderchet, M. and Vernet, G. (2003) Acute and Sublethal Effects of Two Insecticides on Earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris L.) under Conditions. Environmental Toxicology, 18, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tox.10095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dutta, A. and Dutta, H. (2016) Some Insights on the Effect of Pesticides on Earthworms. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 5, 61-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rault, M., Mazzia, C. and Capowiez, Y. (2007) Tissue Distribution and Characterization of Cholinesterase Activity in Six Earthworm Species. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry &amp; Molecular Biology, 147, 340-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2007.01.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lionetto, M.G., Calisi, A. and Schettino, T. (2012) Chapter 16. Earthworm Biomarkers as Tools for Soil Pollution Assessment. In: Hernandez-Soriano, M.C., Ed., Soil Health and Land Use Management, InTech, Italy. www.intechopen.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caselli, F., Gastaldi, L., Gambi, N. and Fabbri, E. (2006) In Vitro Characterization of Cholinesterases in the Earthworm Eisenia andrei. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology &amp; Pharmacology, 143, 416-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soreq, H. and Zakut. H. (1993) Human Cholinesterase and Anticholinesterase. Academic Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calisi, A., Lionetto, M.G. and Schettino, T. (2011) Biomarker Response in the Earthworm Lumbricus terrestris Exposed to Chemical Pollutants. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 4456-4464. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969711007145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, J.V., Pavan, Y.S. and Madhavendra, S.S. (2003) Toxic Effects of Chlorpyrifos on Morphology and Acetylcholinesterase Activity in the Earthworm, Eisenia foetida. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 54, 296-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00013-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, J.V. and Kavitha, P. (2004) Toxicity of Azodrin on the Morphology and Acetylcholinesterase Activity of the Earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environmental Research, 96, 323-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.02.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EC (Council Regulation) (2001) Commission Directive 2001/58. Official Journal of the European Union, No. 212, 24-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calisi, A., Lionetto, M.G. and Schettino, T. (2009) Pollutant-Induced Alterations of Granulocyte Morphology in the Earthworm Eisenia foetida. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72, 1369-1377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.03.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lunt, G.G. (1991) GABA and GABA Receptors in Invertebrates. Seminars in Neuroscience, 3, 251-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1044-5765(91)90022-G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manna, S., Bhattacharya, D., Mandal, T.K. and Dey, S. (2005) Neuropharmacological Effects of Alfa-Cypermethrin in Rats. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 37, 18-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.13849</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bloomquist, J.R. and Soderlund, D.M. (1985) Neurotoxic Insecticides Inhibit GABA-Dependent Chloride Uptake by Mouse Brain Vesicles. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 133, 37-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(85)91838-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ch, R., Singh, A.K., Pandey, P., Saxena, P.N. and Mudiam, M.K.R. (2015) Identifying the Metabolic Perturbations in Earthworm Induced by Cypermethrin Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Based Metabolomics. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 15674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15674</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banerjee, U.C., Sani, R.K., Azmi, W. and Soni, R. (1999) Thermostable Alkaline Protease from Bacillus brevis and Its Characterization as a Laundry Detergent Additive. Process Biochemistry, 35, 213-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(99)00053-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lemaire, C., Damhaut, P., Plenevoux, A. and Cpmar, D. (1994) Enantioselective Synthesis of 6-[Fluorine-18]-Fluoro-L-Dopa from No-Carrier-Added Fluorine-18-Fluoride. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 35, 1996-2002.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cnubben, N.H.P., Rietjens, I.M.C.M., Wortelboer, H., van Zanden, J. and van Bladeren, P.J. (2001) The Interplay of Glutathione-Related Processes in Antioxidant Defense. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 10, 141-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1382-6689(01)00077-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khrer, J.P. (1993) Free Radical as Mediator of Tissue Injury and Disease. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 23, 21-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408449309104073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dazy, M., Masfaraud, J.F. and Férard, J.F. (2009) Induction of Oxidative Biomarkers Associated with Heavy Metal Stress in Fontinalis antipyretica Hedw. Chemosphere, 75, 297-302.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valavanidis, A., Vlahogianni, T., Dassenakis, M. and Scoullos, M. (2006) Molecular Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Aquatic Organisms in Relation to Toxic Environmental Pollutants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 64, 178-189.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Casillas, E., Myers, M. and Ames, E. (1983) Relationship of Serum Chemistry Values to Liver and Kidney Histophathology in English Sole (Parophrys vetulus) after Acute Exposure to Carbon Tetrachloride. Aquatic Toxicology, 3, 61-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(83)90007-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oruc, E.O., Sevgiler, Y. and Uner, N. (2004) Tissue-Specific Oxidative Stress Responses in Fish Exposed to 2,4-D and Azinphosmethyl. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology: Toxicology &amp; Pharmacology, 137, 43-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayes, J.D., Flanagan, J.U. and Jowsey, I.R. (2005) Glutathione Transferases. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 45, 51-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aly, M.A. and Schroder, P. (2008) Effect of Herbicides on Glutathione S-Transferases in the Earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 15, 143-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.02.385</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maity, S., Roy, S., Chaudhury, S. and Bhattacharya, S. (2008) Antioxidant Responses of the Earthworm Lampito mauritii Exposed to Pb and Zn Contaminated Soil. Environmental Pollution, 151, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lukkari, T., Taavistsainen, M., Vaisanen, A. and Haimi, J. (2004) Effects of Heavy Metals on Earthworms along Contamination Gradients in Organic Rich Soil. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 59, 340-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.09.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saint-Denis, M., Narbonne, J.F., Arnaud, C. and Ribera, D. (2001) Biochemical Responses of the Earthworm Eisenia fetida andrei Exposed to Contaminated Artificial Soil: Effects of Lead Acetate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 395-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00177-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Booth, L.H., Heppelthwaite, V. and Mc Glinchy, A. (2000) The Effect of Environmental Parameters on Growth, Cholinesterase Activity and Glutathione S-Transferase Activity in the Earthworm Aporectodea caliginosa. Biomarkers, 5, 46-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135475000230532</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LaCourse, T. (2009) Environmental Change Controls Postglacial Forest Dynamics through Interspecific Differences in Life-History Traits. Ecology, 90, 2149-2160.http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/08-1136.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, Y., Shi, Y., Wang, X., Lu, Y. and Yan, S. (2007) Comparative Effects of Lindane and Deltamethrin on Mortality, Growth, and Cellulase Activity in Earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 89, 31-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.02.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, P.C. and Dash, M.C. (1979) Digestive Enzymes of Some Earthworm. Experientia, 36, 1156-1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01976096</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salokhe, S.G., Sonawane H.V. and Deshpande S.G. (2014) Laboratory Evaluation of Fipronil on Biological, Parameters, Gut Microflora and Physiology of Eudrilus eugeniae. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4, 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martínez Morcillo, S., Yela, J.L., Capoweiz, Y., Mazzia, C., Rault, M. and Sachez-Hernandez, J.C. (2013) Avoidance Behaviour Response and Esterase Inhibition in the Earthworm, Lumbricus terrestris, after Exposure to Chlorpyrifos. Ecotoxicology, 22, 597-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-013-1051-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">First, M.R., Kalpan, L. and Pesce, A.J. (1991) Clinical Chemistry: Theory, Analysis, and Correlation. Mosby-Year Book, MO, 609-610.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shekari, M., Sendi, J.J., Etebari, K., Ziaee, A. and Shadparvar, A. (2008) Effects of Artemisia annua L. (Asteracea) on Nutritional Physiology and Enzyme Activities of Elm Leaf Beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola Mull. (Coleoptera: Chrysomellidae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 91, 66-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2008.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diamantino, T.C., Almeida, E., Soares, A.M. and Guilhermino, L. (2001) Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity as an Effect Criterion in Toxicity Tests with Daphnia magna Straus. Chemosphere, 45, 553-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00029-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ribeiro, S., Guilhermino, L., Sousa, J.P. and Soares, A.M.V.M. (1999) Novel Bioassay Based on Acetylcholinesterase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Activities to Evaluate the Toxicity of Chemicals to Soil Isopods. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 44, 287-293.http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1999.1837</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nathan, S.S., Kalaivani, K., Chung, P.G. and Murugan, K. (2006) Effect of Neem Limonoids on Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) of the Rice Leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Chemosphere, 62, 1388-1393.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riseh, N.S., Ghadamyari, M. and Motamediniya, B. (2012) Biochemical Characterization of α- and β-Glucosidases and α- and β-Galactosidases from Red Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivieri (Col.: Curculionidae). Plant Protection Science, 2, 85-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ribera, D., Narbonne, J.F., Arnaud, C. and Saint-Denis, M. (2001) Biochemical Responses of the Earthworm Eisenia fetida andrei Exposed to Contaminated Artificial Soil, Effects of Carbaryl. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 1123-1130.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00035-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Booth, L.H. and O’Halloran, K. (2001) A Comparison of Biomarker Responses in the Earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa to the Organophosphorus Insecticides Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20, 2494-2502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620201115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Govindarajan, B. and Prabakaran, V. (2012) Monitoring of Soil Insecticide (Monocrotophos) Pollution by Eisenia fetida. Journal of Biosciences Research, 3, 58-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gambi, N., Pasteris, A. and Fabbri, E. (2007) Acetylcholinesterase Activity in the Earthworm Eisenia andrei at Different Conditions of Carbaryl Exposure. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology &amp; Pharmacology, 145, 678-685.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panda, S. and Sahu, S.K. (2004) Recovery of Acetylcholine Esterase Activity of Drawida willsi (Oligochaeta) Following Application of Three Pesticides to Soil. Chemosphere, 55, 283-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muangphra, P., Tharapoom, K., Euawong, N., Namchote, S. and Gooneratne, R. (2015) Chronic Toxicity of Commercial Chlorpyrifos to Earthworm Pheretima peguana. Environmental Toxicology, 31, 1450-1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.22150</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saint-Denis, M., Narbonne, J.F., Arnaud, C., Thybaud, E. and Ribera, D. (1999) Bio-Chemical Responses of the Earthworm Eisenia fetida andrei Exposed to Contaminated Artificial Soil: Effects of Benzo(a)pyrene. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 1837-1846.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00106-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ling, H. (2006) Effect of Carbofuran on Protein Content and the SOD and TChE Activity of the Eisenia foetida Earthworm. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 34, 3165.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, J., Zhang, P., Mu, H. and Gao, M.L. (2006) Toxicity Effect of Combined Contamination of Two Herbicides to Earthworm. Journal of Agro-Environmental Science, 5, 18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J.H., Zhu, L.S., Liu, W., Wang, J. and Xie, H. (2012) Biochemical Responses of Earthworm (Eisenia foetida) to the Pesticides Chlorpyrifos and Fenvalerate. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 22, 236-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15376516.2011.640718</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q., Zhu, L., Wang, J., Xie, H., Wang, J., Han, Y. and Yang, J. (2013) Oxidative Stress and Lipid Peroxidation in the Earthworm Eisenia fetida Induced by Low Doses of Fomesafen. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 201-208.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0962-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, K., Pang, S., Mu, X., Qi, S., Li, D., Cui, F. and Wang, C. (2015) Biological Response of Earthworm, Eisenia fetida, to Five Neonicotinoid Insecticides. Chemosphere, 132, 120-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, P.J., Long, S.M., Spurgeon, D.J., Svendsen, C. and Hankard, P.K. (2004) Toxicological and Biochemical Responses of the Earthworm Lumbricus rubellus to Pyrene, a Non-Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon. Chemosphere, 57, 1675-1681.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.05.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leena, L., Amrita, K. and Preeti, C. (2012) Effect of Dimethoate on Testicular Histomorphology of the Earthworm Eudichogaster kinneari. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 1, 77-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72416-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Datta, S., Singh, J., Singh, S. and Singh, J. (2016) Earthworms, Pesticides and Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 8227-8243.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6375-0</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>