<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2016.411006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-72405</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Synergistic Effect of the Methanolic Extract of Lemongrass and Some Antibiotics to Treat Urinary Tract Bacteria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samah</surname><given-names>Noor</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdel Aziz University, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>31,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>27,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Some medicinal plants are used traditionally in Saudi Arabia to treat many bacterial infections. Three plants, lemongrass (
  <em>Oymbopogon citrates</em>), lantana (
  <em>Lantana cama-ra</em>), and wild olive leaves (
  <em>Olea europaea</em>) were collected, identified, extracted with either hot water or organic solvents (methanol, diethyl ether, ethyl acetate and n-butanol) to investigate their antibacterial activities against
  <em> E. coli</em>. The methanol ex-tracts of lemongrass, lantana and olive showed the highest activities against
  <em> Esherichia coil</em> while aqueous extract exhibited the lowest activities. Thus, the antibacterial activities of the methanolic extract of the three tested plants were determined using agar well diffusion method against some bacterial pathogens, isolated from urine samples. The highest antibacterial activity was recorded for themethanolic extract of lemongrass against all tested bacteria, 
  <em>E. coli</em>, 
  <em>K. pneumoniae, P</em>. 
  <em>aeuroginosa</em>, 
  <em>P. mirabilis</em>, 
  <em>E. faecalis</em> and 
  <em>S. aureus</em>. The tested bacteria differed with regard to their susceptibility to plant extracts. Lemongrass was the most active extract followed by lantana and wild olive extracts. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the methanolic extract of Lemongrass and some used antibiotics, Erythromycin, Tetracycline, Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin and Chloramphenicol were determined usingfluorescein diacetate method. Synergistic effect of the methanolic extract of lemongrass with the previous antibiotics against the tested clinical bacterial isolates was determined and the Fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) of different combination of the extract and the antibiotics were determined. FIC index (FICI) was calculated and it was ranged from 0.08 - 0.98. The interaction between the tested plant extract and the tested antibiotics was either synergistic or additive effects and no antagonistic effect was recorded. In conclusion, methanolic extract of lemongrass singly or in combination with some antibiotics can be used to treat pathogenic bacteria that cause urinary tract infections.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Antibacterial Activities</kwd><kwd> Fluorescein Diacetate</kwd><kwd> MIC</kwd><kwd> Methanol</kwd><kwd> Lemongrass</kwd><kwd> Antibiotics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli are the most-frequent causative agents of acute urinary tract infections (UTI) that cause fatal infections if they are not treated properly or left untreated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref3">3</xref>] . The urinary pathogens, E. coli found attached to the epithelium of the bladder and account to 75% - 95% of cases while other enterobacteria, Klebsiella, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas earuginosa and the Gram positive Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates were less common. Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus agalactiae may be isolated from patients with complicated cystitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref5">5</xref>] . Generally, all kinds of bacterial infections were treated with certain antibiotics but unfortunately and during recent years, bacteria are gradually becoming resistant due to the miss use of antibiotics. There is an accelerated search for novel antibacterial agents from plants which playing an important role in improving human health. For centuries in developed and undeveloped countries, plants or their extracts can be used as more effective and less toxic medical products or antibiotics to treat various infectious diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref6">6</xref>] . Many plants produced many secondary products that can be used as antimicrobial agents which opened new avenues for novel natural antibiotics that can serve as substitutes for current antibiotics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref7">7</xref>] . Many studied reported that plant extracts may have great action in treating multidrug resistant bacteria and fewer numbers of plant species have been studied for their secondary product productions while the rests of the plants still need studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref10">10</xref>] . Naik et al. (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref11">11</xref>] found that lemongrass strongly inhibited Gram positive bacteria compared to Gram negative bacteria while lantana exhibited antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and B. cereus due to the presence of forty-one components including caryophyllene, humulene, sabinene, bicyclogermacrene and davanone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref12">12</xref>] . Themethanolic extract of wild olive showed the highest antibacterial activities compared to other organic solvents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref13">13</xref>] . Phytochemical from plants can be used as antimicrobial agents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref14">14</xref>] , antiviral [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref15">15</xref>] and antioxidant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref16">16</xref>] . They also stimulate enzyme activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref17">17</xref>] and immune system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref18">18</xref>] . Plant extracts are rich in various components such as caffeine, tannins, amino acids, vitamins and saponins which are considered as hypocholesterolemic, neuroprotective, hypolipaemic, cardioprotective, anti infective, antimutagenic and antitumor activities as well as dental caries prevention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref19">19</xref>] . The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activities of some plant extracts in vitro and the synergistic effect of the methanolic extract of lemongrass and some antibiotics to treat urinary tract bacteria was determined.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Pathogenic Bacteria</title><p>The tested bacteria were Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. All bacterial isolates were obtained from mid stream urine specimens collected from patients at King Fahad General Hospital, Saudi Arabia and identified and processed according to standard guidelines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref20">20</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Medicinal Pant Materials</title><p>Pants, lemongrass stalk and leaves (Cymbopogon citratus), lantana leaves (Lantana camara) and wild olive leaves (Olea europaea) were collected during May 2015, from various areas of Al Baha region, Saudi Arabia. Identification of the previous plants was carried out at the Department of Biology, KAU, SA.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Preparation of Plant Extracts</title><p>After cleaning the collected plants, they were dried and extracted with either hot water or organic solvents (50 g/200ml of the solvent) for 24 h. The organic solvents used were methanol, n-butanol, ethyl acetate or diethyl ether and the resultant extract was filtered using a glass wool and dried at 40˚C to dryness under reduced pressure using rotary evaporator. The water extract was dried using lyophilizer and all the obtained extracts were dissolved in 1 ml DMSO and stored −70˚C until used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Antibacterial Activities of the Plant Extracts and Antibiotics</title><p>Agar well diffusion assay was used to detect the antibacterial activities of the prepared extracts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref21">21</xref>] and antibiotics. The antibiotics, Erythromycin, Tetracycline, Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin and Chloramphenicol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) were used.</p><p>Few microbial colonies were collected in sterile nutrient broth and adjusted to the turbidity of the standard of 0.5 McFarland solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref22">22</xref>] which has 4 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/ml. Each Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid) plate was inoculated with 1.0 ml of the bacterial suspension. Agar wells were done using sterile cork borer (0.6 mm) and each well was filled with 100 &#181;l of the tested plant extract in DMSO. All inoculated plates were incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as negative control and Ampicillin was used asa positive control. Mean diameter of inhibition zone of three replicated plates was determined. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of plant extract, antibiotics or the mixture of both for all tested bacteria were determined in 96 well ELISA trays by the methods described by Chand et al. (1994) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref23">23</xref>] and was modified by Aly and GumgumJee (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref9">9</xref>] . Each well contained 175 &#181;l of the bacterial suspension (4 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/ml), 20 &#181;l the plant extract, or the solvent as control. After 40 minutes of incubation, fluorescein diacetate (FDA, 5 &#181;l of a 0.2% w/v in acetone) was added and the plates were incubated for 90 minutes. The obtained Green color from FDA hydrolysis was determined at 490 nm using an ELISA tray reader.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Fractional Inhibitory Concentration</title><p>Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) is the lowest concentrations of the extract and the antibiotics in combination giving no detectable bacterial growth after incubation.FIC index values were calculated using the formula:</p><p>FIC index = MIC of extract in combination/MIC of extract alone + MIC of antibiotics in combination/MIC of antibiotics alone.</p><p>The combination defined synergy if ∑FIC ≤ 0.5, additiveif 0.5 &lt; ∑FIC ≤ 1, indifference if 1 &lt; ∑FIC ≤ 4 and antagonism as ∑FIC &gt; 4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Each experiment was carried out three times replicates and the means &#177; standard deviation was recorded. Analysis of variance, ANOVA was used to determine the significant at P ≤ 0.5.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Lemongrass (Oymbopogon citrates), lantana (Lantana camara), and wild olive (Olea europaea) were belonging to families Gramineae, Verbenaceae and Oleaceae, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The leaves of lantana and wild olive and shoot system of lemongrass were collected, identified, extracted with either hot water or organic solvents (methanol, diethyl ether, ethyl acetate and n-butanol) to investigate their antibacterial activities against E. coli. The methanolic extracts of lantana, lemongrass and wild olive showed the highest activities against E. coil with diameter of inhibition zones 28, 22 and 19 mm, respectively while their aqueous extract exhibited the lowest activities, 7.7, 8.1 and 7.8 mm as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Thus, the antibacterial activities of the methanolic extract of the three tested plants were determined against the tested bacteria, (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>)</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The studied medicinal plants to detect their antibacterial activities and the used parts</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Used part</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Family</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scientific name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Common name</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Verbenaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lantana camara</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lantana</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gramineae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oymbopogon citrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lemon grass</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oleaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Olea europaea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wild olive</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Antibacterial activities of the aqueous and organic extracts of three tested plant against E. coil as test organism</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >F value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Type of the extract</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Used plant</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Butanol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethyl acetate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diethyl ether</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methanol extract</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aqueous extract (hot)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lantana</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.4*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 &#177; 2.5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 &#177; 2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lemon grass</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 &#177; 2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Olive</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*: significant results where the calculated F value &gt; F Tabulated.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The antibacterial activities (diameter of the inhibition zone, mm) of the methanolic extract of Lantana, lemongrass and olive against different pathogenic bacteria and compared to Ampicillin (positive control)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Diameter o the inhibition zone (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pathogenic bacteria</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ampicillin (control, 5 &#181;g/ml)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Olive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lemon-grass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lantana</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 &#177; 2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. coli</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K. pneumoniae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. mirabilis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#177; 1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. aeuroginosa</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. faecalis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. aureus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Activity index<sup>+</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>+</sup>Activity index was calculated as the mean value of net zones of inhibition (mm) against the pathogenic bacteria, * Significant difference compared to Ampicillin at p ≤ 0.05.</p><p>obtained from urine samples using agar well diffusion method. The tested bacteria were K. pneumoniae, P. aeuroginosa, P. mirabilis, E. faecalis and S. aureus. The highest antibacterial activity was recorded for the methanolic extract of lemongrass, followed by lantana and finally olive leave extract, against all tested bacteria, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeuroginosa, P. mirabilis, E. faecalis and S. aureus, with inhibition zone diameter ranged from 20 - 28 mm, 14 - 22 mm and 8 - 20 mm. The tested bacteria differed with regard to their susceptibility to the plant extracts. Lemon grass methanolic extract was the most active extract for inhibition of the Gram negative E. coli and K. pneumonia followed by P. mirabilis and P. aeuroginosa. The effect of lantana leave extract was also on Gram negative bacteria especially E. coli and K. pneumoniae while olive leave extract inhibit mainly Gram positive bacteria, S. aureus and E. faecalis. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the methanolic extract of lemongrass and some used antibiotics, Erythromycin, Tetracycline, Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin and Chloramphenicol were determined using fluorescein diacetate method (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Synergistic effect of the methanolic extract of lemongrass with the previous antibiotics against the tested clinical bacterial isolates was determined (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) and the Fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) of different combinations of lemongrass methanolic extract and some selected antibiotics were determined (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). FIC index (FICI) was calculated and it was ranged from 0.08 - 0.98. The interaction between plant extract and the tested antibiotics was either synergistic effect (∑FIC or FICI ≤ 0.5) or additive effect (0.5 &lt; ∑FIC ≤ 1) and no indifference (1 &lt; ∑FIC ≤ 4) or antagonistic (∑FIC &gt; 4). The interaction between the tested plant extract and the tested antibiotics was either synergistic or additive effects and no antagonistic effect was recorded. In conclusion, methanolic extract of lemongrass singly or in combination with some antibiotics can be used to treat urinary tract infections with different pathogenic bacteria.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) &#181;g/ml of methanolic extract of lemon grass and different antibiotics using Fluorescein diacetate method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Tested bacteria</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Plant extract (mg/ml)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Antibiotic (&#181;g/ml)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amx</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cip</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. coli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96 &#177; 0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K. pneumoniae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96 &#177; 0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. mirabilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96 &#177; 0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. aeuroginosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 &#177; 0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. faecalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. aureus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.2 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.036 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.86 &#177; 0.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Ery: Erythromycin, Tet: Tetracycline, Amx: Amoxicillin, Cip: Ciprofloxacin, Chl: Chloramphenicol.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) &#181;g/ml of the mixture of methanolic extract of lemon grass and different antibiotics using Fluorescein diacetate method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tested bacteria</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) &#181;g/ml</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PE + Amx</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PE + Chl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PE + Cip</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PE + Ery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PE + Tet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. coli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4 &#177; 0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K. pneumoniae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0. 05 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 &#177; 0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. mirabilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 &#177; 0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. aeuroginosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. faecalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >S. aureus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0 &#177; 0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PF: Plant extract, Ery: Erythromycin, Tet: Tetracycline, Amx: Amoxicillin, Cip: Ciprofloxacin, Chl: Chloramphenicol</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Fractional inhibitory concentrations index of combination of the methanol extract of lemon grass and some antibiotics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tested bacteria</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PE + Amx</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PE + Chl</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PE + Cip</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PE + Ery</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Tet + PE</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FIC index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FIC index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FIC index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FIC index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FIC index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eff.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. coli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K. pneumoniae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. mirabilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. aeuroginosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. faecalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. aureus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>S: synergistic effect, A: additive, Eff.: Effect, PF: Plant extract Ery: Erythromycin, Tet: Tetracycline, Amx: Amoxicillin, Cip: Ciprofloxacin, Chl: Chloramphenico.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The resistance of bacterial pathogensto ampicillin and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole was increased and became major therapeutic problems. Multidrug-resistant bacteria isolates are widely distributed in the hospitals through patient contacts and are increasingly being isolated from community-acquired infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref29">29</xref>] . In normal genitourinary tracts, the Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus mirabilis and occasionally Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the Gram-positive bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, S. saprophyticusis were recorded. In hospitalized patients, E. coli accounts for about 50% of cases, Klebsiella, Proteus, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas and Serratia account for about 40% and the Gram-positive bacterial cocci account for the remainder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref30">30</xref>] . Many studies were carried out to extract and characterize plant products that inhibit the most pathogenic bacteria which are difficult to be effectively treateddue to antibiotics limitation and availability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref31">31</xref>] . Inhibition of bacterial growth without harming the host cells represent the qualities required for safe and potent therapeutic agent. The plants lemongrass, lantana and wild olive were used traditionally in folkloric medicine in Saudi Arabia for their therapeutic activity in treating different pathogens and diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref33">33</xref>] . Lemongrass is a perennial aromatic medicinal grass mainly found in Najd, in the northern and eastern parts and commonly used as an infusion or tea for kidney remedy and fevers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref32">32</xref>] . Aqueous and organic solvents of lemongrass, lantana and wild olive were compared. Methanol significantly extracts the active ingredient of the plants and was the most active in inhibition of E. coli growth. Similarly, the methanolic extract of Olae showed antibacterial activity similar to that of the antibiotic amoxicillin against P. aeruginosa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref34">34</xref>] . In addition, the methanol extract of Spondias mombin showed excellent antibacterial activity with a mean zone of inhibition ≥11.1 and activity index of 0.8 - 1.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref35">35</xref>] . The antimicrobial effect of any extract depends on the used method for extraction, the used solvents and the used plant. The methanolic extract of lemongrass showed excellent antibacterial activities against all the tested bacteria with bacterial index of 24.3 and no significant difference was found when compared to Ampicillin (positive control). Lower activities were obvious in case of lantana extract and olive extract where the difference was significant at p ≤ 0.05 compared to Ampicillin. It was reported that the extract of lemongrass was effective against some bacteria including Acinetobacter baumanii, Aeromonas veronii, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref37">37</xref>] . The differences in the antibacterial effects of the three tested plant extracts may due to the qualities and quantities of active compounds in the extract. The extract of lemongrass was among the most significant active and nontoxic natural extracts due to free and bound flavonoid fractions and considered an important antimicrobial agent for many kinds of infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref38">38</xref>] . The presence of the major volatile compounds nerol, geranial and geraniol in lemongrass extract was confirmed using Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and all the tested pathogens are variably susceptible to these compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref39">39</xref>] . The results of Al Yousef (2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref40">40</xref>] showed that Lemongrass has a fungitoxic effect and cause a reduction in fungal viability and spore germination, loss of pigmentation and disrupted conidiospore structure, supporting a possible role of infection control and the use as antifungal agents. Promising antifungal activity of olive leaves against some plant pathogens was due to the presence of phenolic compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref41">41</xref>] . Broth micro-dilution technique was used to determine theantiacterial activities and the same method was used for the antibiotic griseofulvin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref42">42</xref>] . The calculated minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for lemongrass were greater than that obtained for Erythromycin, Tetracycline, Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin and Chloramphenicol. FIC index (FICI) was ranged from 0.08 - 0.98. The most prominent andsynergistic interaction was observed between lemongrass and Amoxicillin (Amx) against E. coli, P. mirabilis and P. aeuroginosa with ∑FIC ≤0.5. Ahmad A and Viljoen (2015) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref39">39</xref>] calculated the MICs of lemongrass extract and Ag<sup>+</sup> for all the tested pathogens and they ranged from 0.032 - 1 mg/ml and 0.004 - 0.064 mg/ml, respectively, while the MIC of their combination (FICI values) were ranged from 0.258 - 2.186 which indicating synergy, additive and indifferent interactions. The combination of Ampicillin and fresh garlic extract showed synergistic interaction for different S. aureus isolates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref43">43</xref>] . Further studies are needed for isolation, separation and identification of the active materials to be appliedas alternative drug for treatment of urinary system infections. The phenolics and polyphenols, essential oils; alkaloids; lectins and polypeptides are the most useful phytochemicals act as antimicrobial compounds. Their mechanisms of action vary according to their structure (Aly et al., 2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref10">10</xref>] which may include enzyme inhibition, disruption of cell membranes, inactivation of the protein, complex formation with soluble proteins, DNA and bacterial cell walls [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72405-ref45">45</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Very few studies confirm the viability of some plant extracts as antibiotics on urinary tract infections bacteria. In this study we supported the promising use of plant extract especially crude extracts of lemongrass, singly or in combination with some commonly used antibiotics. Similar combinations are usually used by the local people to treat bacterial infections associated with many diseases. Moreover, from our results, we suggest that lemon grass could be useful in the development of new antimicrobial drugs, especially against urinary tract infections caused by bacteria. In addition, more investigations are needed to identify potential medical uses of more traditional and herbal plants against different kinds of infections.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Noor, S. (2016) Synergistic Effect of the Methanolic Extract of Lemongrass and Some Antibiotics to Treat Urinary Tract Bacteria. Journal of Bio- sciences and Medicines, 4, 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2016.411006</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72405-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, A.U. and Musharraf, A. (2004) Plasmid-Mediated Multiple Antibiotic Resistance in Proteus mirabilis Isolated from Patients with Urinary Tract Infection. Medical Science Monitor. International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 10, 598-602.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maragakis, L.L. and Perl, T.M. (2008) Acinetobacter baumannii: Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Treatment Options. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 46, 1254-1263.  
https://doi.org/10.1086/529198</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cunha, B.A. (2009) Antibiotic Essentials. 8th Edition, Jones &amp; Barlett, Sudbury, MA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farrell, D.J., Morrissey, I., De Rubeis, D., Robbins, M. and Felmingham, D. (2003) A UK Multicentre Study of the Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacterial Pathogens Causing Urinary Tract Infection. Journal of Infection, 46, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1053/jinf.2002.1091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mirsoleymani, S.R., Salimi, M., ShareghiBrojeni, M., Ranjbar, M. and Mehtarpoor, M. (2014) Bacterial Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: A Four-Year Surveillance Study (2009-2012). International Journal of Pediatrics, 2014, 126-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Betoni, J.E.C., Mantovani, R.P., Barbosa, L.N., Di Stasi, L.C. and Junior, A.F. (2006) Synergism between Plant Extract and Antimicrobial Drugs Used on Staphylococcus aureus Diseases. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 101, 387-390.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Donato, F., Maurin, D., Brun, P., Delahaye, T. and Salati, P. (2009) Constraints on WIMP Dark Matter from the High Energy PAMELA p/p Data. Physical Review Letters, 102, 071301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.071301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Lemos, J.A., Blazing, M.A., Wiviott, S.D., Lewis, E.F., Fox, K.A., White, H.D., et al. (2004) Early Intensive vs a Delayed Conservative Simvastatin Strategy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Phase Z of the A to Z Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1307-16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.11.1307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aly, M.M. and Gumgumjee, N.M. (2011) Antimicrobial Efficacy of Rheum palmatum, Curcuma longa and Alpinia officinarum Extracts against Some Pathogenic Microorganisms. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 12058-12063.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aly, M.M., Al-Ghamdi, M., Bafeel, S.O. and Khedr, A.M. (2013) Antimicrobial Activities and Phytochemical Analysis of the Essential Oil of Lavandula dentata and Plectranthus nudiflorus, Collected from Al Baha Region, Saudi Arabia. Life Science Journal, 10, 3302-3309.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naik, M.I., Fomda, B.A., Jaykumar, E. and Bhat, J.A. (2010) Antibacterial Activity of Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) Oil against Some Selected Pathogenic Bacterias. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 3, 535-538.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(10)60129-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saikia, A.K. and Sahoo, R.K. (2011) Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Essential oil of Lantana camara L. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 8, 599-602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paudel, S., Magrati, T. and Lamichhane, J.R. (2011) Antimicrobial Activity of Wild Olive Crude Extracts in Vitro. International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research, 2, 110-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Sayed, H.A. and Aly, M.M. (2014) Antibacterial Activities of Six Medicinal Plants Used Traditionally by Saudi People to Treat Common Diseases. British Biotechnology Journal, 4, 499-510. https://doi.org/10.9734/BBJ/2014/8532</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Garcia, S.M.A. (2003) Review of the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. In: Ba, M., Chavance, P., Gascuel, D., Pauly, D. and Vakily, M., Eds., Pêcheries Maritimes, écosystèmes et SociétésenAfrique de l’Ouest: Un Demi-siècle de Changement, Actes du Symposium International de Dakar (Sénégal), ACP-UE.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elsawi, N., Backer, W., Aly, M.M. and Baz, L. (2010) Assessment of Therapeutic Value of Black Costus (Saussurea lappa) Using Several Parameters. Journal of International Environmental Application &amp; Science, 5, 832-841.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Platel, K. and Srinivasan, K. (1996) Influence of Dietary Spices or Their Active Principles on Digestive Enzymes of Small Intestinal Mucosa in Rats. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 47, 55-59. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637489609028561</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Middleton, E. and Kandaswam, C.C. (1992) Effects of Flavonoids on Immune and Inflammatory Cell Functions. Biochemical Pharmacology, 43, 1167-1179.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(92)90489-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weber, J.M., Ruzindana-Umunyana, A., Imbeault, L. and Sircar, S. (2003) Inhibition of Adenovirus Infection and Adenain by Green Tea Catechins. Antiviral Research, 58, 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3542(02)00212-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) (2012) Administrative Procedures M100-S18. CLSI, Wayne.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holder, I.A. and Boyce, S.T. (1994) Agar Well Diffusion Assay Testing of Bacterial Susceptibility to Various Antimicrobials in Concentrations Non-Toxic for Human Cells in Culture. Burns, 20, 426-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(94)90035-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McFarland, J. (1907) The Nephelometer: An Instrument for Estimating the Number of Bacteria in Suspensions Used for Calculating the Opsonic Index and for Vaccines. Journal of the American Medical Association, 49, 1176-1178.  
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1907.25320140022001f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chand, S., Lusunzi, I., Veal, D.A.L., Williams, R. and Karuso, P. (1994) Rapid Screening of the Antimicrobial Activity of Extracts and Natural Products. Journal of Antibiotics, 47, 1295-1304. https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.47.1295</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eliopoulos, G.M. and Eliopoulos, C.T. (1988) Antibiotic Combinations: Should They Be Tested? Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 1, 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.1.2.139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Isenberg, H.D. (1992) Synergism Testing: Broth Microdilution Checkerboard and Broth Macrodilution Methods. In: Isenberg, H.D., Ed., Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, 2th Edition, American Society Microbiology, Washington DC, 1-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Petersen, P.J., Labthavikul, P., Jones, C.H. and Bradford, P.A. (2006) In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Tigecycline in Combination with Other Antimicrobial Agents Determined by Chequerboard and Time-Kill Kinetic Analysis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 57, 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki477</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Helmi, N.R., Zaman, R.M. and Aly, M.M. (2013) Prevalence of Gram-Positive Bacteria in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Study of Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Molecular Typing. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 4, 1231-1245.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Halwani, M.A., Tashkandy, N.A.J., Aly, M.M., Al Masoudi, S. and Dhafar, O.O. (2015) Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance Bacteria in Jeddah’s Ministry of Health Hospitals, Saudi Arabia. Advances in Microbiology, 5, 780-786. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2015.512082</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaman, R.M., Aly, M.M. and Helmi, N.R. (2015) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from a Teaching Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 9, 2145-2158. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2015.7584</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Imam, T.H. (2013) Introduction to Urinary Tract Infections. 
www.msdmanuals.com/professional/genitourinary-disorders</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aly, M.M. and Bafiel, S. (2008) Screening for Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants in Saudi Arabia. World Conference on Medical and Aromatic, Cape Town, 9-14 November 2008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lebling, R.W. (1999) Handbook of Arabian Medicinal. 
www.geocities.com/Athens/Troy/4040/HERBALME.htm(9of15)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al Garni, E.H. and Hafez, D.A. (2015) Effect of Extracts of Some Herbs on Fertility of Male Diabetic Rats. Journal of American Science, 11, 165-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mariita, R.M., Orodho, J.A., Okemo, P.O., Kirimuhuzya, C., Otieno, J.N. and Magadula, J.J. (2011) Methanolic Extracts of Aloe secundiflora Engl. inhibits in Vitro Growth of Tuberculosis and Diarrhea-Causing Bacteria. Pharmacognosy Research, 3, 95-99.  
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.81956</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adegoke, A.A., Aiyegoro, O.A. and Stenstrom, T.A. (2016) Effect of Interaction of Methanol Leaf Extract of Spondias mombin (Linn) and Amoxicillin on Some Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 15, 475-480.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v15i3.7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiziana Baratta, M., Damien Dorman, H.J., Deans, S.G., Cristina Figueiredo, A. and Barroso, J.G. (1998) Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Some Commercial Essential Oils. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 13, 235-244.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1026(1998070)13:4&lt;235::AID-FFJ733&gt;3.0.CO;2-T</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cimanga, K., Tona, L., Apers, S., Bruyne, T., Hermans, N., Totte, J., et al. (2002) Correlation between Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils of Some Aromatic Medicinal Plants Growing in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 79, 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00384-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dupuis, G., Johri, B., Bandoni, R.J. and Towers, G.H. (1972) Cinnamylphenols as Inhibitors of Fungal Growth. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 18, 929-932.  
https://doi.org/10.1139/m72-142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, A. and Viljoen, A. (2015) The in Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Cymbopogon Essential Oil (Lemon Grass) and Its Interaction with Silver Ions. Phytomedicine, 22, 657-665.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2015.04.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Al Yousef</surname><given-names> S.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>Antifungal Activity of Volatiles from Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) and Peppermint (Mentha piperita) Oils against Some Respiratory Pathogenic Species of Aspergillus</article-title><source> International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 261</fpage>-<lpage>272</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winkelhousen, E., Pospiech, R. and Laufenberg, G. (2005) Antifungal Activity of Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Dried Olive Pomace. Bulletin of the Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia, 24, 41-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Araujo</surname><given-names> C.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Miranda</surname><given-names> K.C. Fernandes</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> O.F.L.</surname><given-names> Soares</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> A.J. and Silva</surname><given-names> M.R.R </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Dermatophytes Isolated in Goiania, Brazil, against Five Antifungal Agents by Broth Microdilution Method. Rev. Inst. Med. trop. S</article-title><source> Paulo</source><volume> 51</volume>,<fpage> 9</fpage>-<lpage>12</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pillai, R., Trivedi, N.A. and Bhatt, J.D. (2013) Studies on in Vitro Interaction of Ampicillin and Fresh Garlic Extract against Staphylococcus aureus by Checkerboard Method. Ancient Science of Life, 33, 114-118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, A.A. (1999) Studies on Some Medicinal Plants as a Source of Antifungal Substances in North Africa. MSc Thesis, Institution of African Research and Studies, Cairo University, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72405-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cowan</surname><given-names> M.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents</article-title><source> Clinical Microbiology Reviews</source><volume> 12</volume>,<fpage> 564</fpage>-<lpage>582</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>