A stability-indicating RP-HPLC method has been developed and validated for simultaneous determination of Valsartan & Hydrochlorothiazide and their impurities in FDC (Fixed Dose Combination) tablet dosage form. The method was developed using L1 column (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 μm) with gradient elution using the mobile phase consisting of solvent-A (0.1% Ortho phosphoric acid) and solvent-B (100% Acetonitrile); the gradient program (T
min/%B) was set as 0/10, 5/10, 20/60, 40/60, 41/10 and 50/10. The eluted compounds were monitored at 265 nm. The developed method was validated as per ICH guidelines with respect to specificity, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, accuracy, precision and robustness. The influence of Acid, Alkaline, Oxidative, Photolytic, Thermal and Humidity stress conditions, on drug product was studied. The limit of quantification results of Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide and their impurities are, VAL: 0.303 μg/mL, HCTZ: 0.019 μg/mL, VAL RC-B: 0.085 μg/mL, VAL RC-C: 0.327 μg/mL, HCT RC-A: 0.017 μg/mL, CTZ: 0.080 μg/mL and 5-Chloro HCT: 0.047 μg/mL. The proposed method is suitable for the estimation of Valsartan & Hydrochlorothiazide impurities in tablets dosage form.
Valsartan & Hydrochlorothiazide are available with the brand name of “Diovan HCTZ” in the form of immediate-release tablets with the dosage strengths VAL/HCTZ: 80 mg/12.5 mg, 160 mg/25 mg, 160 mg/12.5 mg, 320 mg/25 mg and 320 mg/12.5 mg. Diovan HCTZ is a combination of valsartan, an orally active, specific angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) acting on the AT1 receptor subtype, and hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic [1] .
Valsartan (VAL), a nonpeptide molecule, is chemically described as N-(1-oxope- ntyl)-N[[2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl]methyl]-L-Valine. Its empirical formula is C24H29N5O3 and molecular weight is 435.5 gms/mol. Valsartan is a white, practically white fine powder. It is soluble in ethanol and methanol and slightly soluble in water [1] .
Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is a thiazide diuretic, chemically described as 6-chloro- 3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,4-benzothiadiazine-7-sulfonamide 1,1-dioxide. Its empirical formula is C7H8ClN3O4S2 and molecular weight is 297.73 gms/mol. HCTZ is a white, practically white, odorless, crystalline powder. It is slightly soluble in water; freely soluble in sodium hydroxide solution, in n-butylamine, and in dimethylformamide; sparingly soluble in methanol; and insoluble in ether, in chloroform, and in dilute mineral acids [1] .
Monographs for VAL & HCTZ drug substance and drug product are available in United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) and in European Pharmacopoeia (EP) [2] [3] . And VAL + HCTZ tablets monograph is available in USP [2] . Literature survey reveals that Protein Precipitation/HPLC, HPLC/Liquid extraction, and UV methods for VAL [4] [5] [6] [7] and HPLC, GC/MS methods [8] [9] for HCTZ & HPLC, UPLC, UV, Capillary electrophoresis, First derivative UV, HPLC with Fluorimetric detection, LC/MS and Micellar electro kinetic chromatographic methods for simultaneous estimation of VAL + HCTZ in tablet dosage forms are available [10] - [19] . And Zhang Hui et al. [20] & Chen Xiao et al. [21] reported a method for the estimation of related substances in VAL & HCTZ tablet dosage form.
The objective of this article is to present a stability-indicating method to separate and estimate VAL & HCTZ and its related compounds precisely and accurately, due to that HCTZ-1 & HCTZ-2 impurities were not well separated from each other and peak shapes were found not symmetric in references [2] [20] [21] . In the present work, a simple, fast, accurate and precise liquid chromatographic method was developed for the separation and determination of VAL & HCTZ and its impurities.
2. Material and Methods2.1. Reagents and Chemicals
The purity of all chemicals used was above 99%. Standards of VAL, HCTZ and their impurities were supplied by Celltrion, South Korea. The chemical structures of VAL & HCTZ and their impurities are presented in Figure 1. The purities are respectively, VAL (99.4%), HCTZ (100%) and their impurities VAL RC-B [VAL-1] (97.0%), VAL RC-C [VAL-2] (98%), HCT RC-A [HCTZ-1] (99%), CTZ [HCTZ-2] (99.6%), 5- CHLORO HCT [HCTZ-3] (99.1%) and HCT DIMER [HCTZ-4] (84.5%). The chemicals and reagents manufacturer details are as follows, acetonitrile (HPLC-Gradient
Chemical structures of valsartan, hydrochlorothiazide and their impurities: A. Valsartan (VAL); B. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ); C. HCTZ-1; D. HCTZ-2; E. HCTZ-3; F. HCTZ-4; G. VAL-1; H. VAL-2
grade; J T Baker), ortho phosphoric acid (Analytical grade; Sigma Aldrich) and highly purified water for analysis prepared by using Millipore water purification system (Millipore USA).
2.2. Instruments
Standard and test solutions were prepared using 50% Acetonitrile in Milli-Q water as diluent and analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1260 infinity; Germany). HPLC system equipped with a quaternary pump, auto sampler with thermostat, column compartment, and PDA detector. Using Chemstation software the chromatograms were monitored and integrated. Hydrolysis stress studies performed using digital water bath (Grant). Samples stressed in dry air oven for thermal stress studies (Thermo scientific). Mobile phase was degassed in a sonicator (Powersonic 420; Labtech) and 0.45 μm Nylon membrane filters (PALL life sciences, USA) used for mobile phase filtration.
2.3. Chromatographic Conditions
The chromatographic column, Waters Symmetry shield RP18 (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 µm); and mobile phase consisting solvent A and B used for method development. 0.1% phosphoric acid (1 mL of ortho phosphoric acid in 1000 mL of milli-Q water) was used as solvent-A and 100% acetonitrile was used as solvent-B. The gradient elution (Time min /% of Solvent-B) was set as 0/10, 5/10, 20/60, 40/60, 41/10 and 50/10, mobile phase flow rate was 1.0 mL∙min−1, column oven temperature at 25˚C and the chromatograms were monitored at 265 nm. Standard and sample solutions were injected at 20 µL of injection volume and 100% Acetonitrile used as needle wash solvent to reduce carryover from injector.
3. Experimental3.1. Preparation of System Suitability Solution
A stock solutions of VAL, HCTZ, HCTZ-1 & VAL-1 (640 μg∙mL−1 of VAL, 100 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ, 500 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ-1 and 32 μg∙mL−1 of VAL-1) were prepared by dissolving appropriate amount of drugs in diluent (Milli-Q water and Acetonitrile 50:50 v/v). Working solutions of 32 μg∙mL−1 of VAL, 5 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ, and 25 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ-1 and 32 μg∙mL−1 of VAL-1 were prepared by spiking VAL, HCTZ & HCTZ-1 stock solutions to VAL-1 stock solution. Individual stock solutions were prepared in diluent.
3.2. Preparation of Standard Solution
Working solution of 3.2 μg∙mL−1 of VAL, 0.5 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ, and 2.5 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ-1 and 3.2 μg∙mL−1 of VAL-1 standard solution is prepared by diluting appropriate volume of above system suitability solution with diluent.
3.3. Preparation of Test Solutions
Here test solution is prepared at concentration of 1600 μg∙mL−1 for VAL and 250 μg∙mL−1 for HCTZ to get sufficient LOQ values, good peak shapes and adequate resolution between all the peaks. Hence second dilution is proposed for valsartan test solution preparation.
10 tablets of each strength taken into a 250 mL flask, dispersed the tablets with 5 mL of water. Added 70% of the diluent of total volume and sonicated for 15 min and diluted to volume with diluent. The above solutions were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant liquid was further filtered through 0.45 µm PVDF (or) Nylon syringe filters.
Test solution preparation-HCTZ:
For 80/12.5 mg & 160/12.5 mg:
Dilute 5 mL of the above clear test stock solution to 10 mL with diluent and mix well.
For 160/25 mg:
Dilute 5 mL of the above clear test stock solution to 20 mL with diluent and mix well.
Test solution preparation-VAL:
For 80/12.5 mg:
Dilute 5 mL of the above clear test stock solution to 10 mL with diluent and mix well.
For 160/12.5 mg & 160/25 mg:
Dilute 5 mL of the above clear test stock solution to 20 mL with diluent and mix well.
5 tablets of each strength taken into a 250 mL flask, dispersed the tablets with 5 mL of water. Added 70% of the diluent of total volume and sonicated for 15 min and diluted to volume with diluent. The above solutions were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10min. The supernatant liquid was further filtered through 0.45 µm PVDF (or) Nylon syringe filters.
Test solution preparation-HCTZ:
For 320/12.5 mg:
Use above clear test stock solution.
For 320/25 mg:
Dilute 5 mL of the above clear test stock solution to 10 mL with diluent and mix well.
Test solution preparation-VAL:
For 320/12.5 mg & 320/25 mg:
Dilute 5 mL of the above clear test stock solution to 20 mL with diluent and mix well.
Analysis of impurities from Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets:
Inject 20 µL of the blank (diluent), System suitability solution, Standard solution in replicate and Test solution for HCTZ and for VAL into the HPLC system, record the chromatograms, and measure the responses of the all impurity peaks. Calculate % of HCTZ-1, HCTZ-2, HCTZ-3 and HCTZ-4 against HCTZ peak response from standard solution and, VAL-1, VAL-2 and Unknown impurities against VAL peak response from standard solution (Figure 2(A) & Figure 2(B)).
(A) Typical chromatograms of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide at 265 nm (a. Blank, b. Impurity Mixture, c. RS Standard Solution and d. RS SST solution); (B) Typical chromatograms of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide at 265 nm (a. Spiked sample and b. Placebo).
3.4. Method Validation
The objective of validation of an analytical procedure is to demonstrate that it is suitable for its intended purpose. The method was validated according to International Council for Harmonisation Q2 (R1) guidelines [22] for validation of analytical procedures in order to determine the specificity, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, accuracy, precision and robustness.
Here HCTZ-4 impurity is not considered to determine the specificity, linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, accuracy, precision and robustness of method validation parameters, and only considered for identification purpose, due to not stable at solution state.
3.5. Solution Stability
The stability of VAL, HCTZ and their impurities was determined by leaving spiked sample solution in a tightly capped volumetric flask at room temperature (25˚C) and in refrigerator (5˚C) up to 48 hrs and measuring the amounts of the five impurities at every 24 hrs.
3.6. Specificity
Specificity is the ability of the method to confirm the non-interference from blank and placebo at the retention time of analyte peaks and at its potential impurities; and to measure the analyte response in the presence of its potential impurities. This study was carried out in presence of its six impurities. Forced degradation studies performed on drug product at the concentration of 1600 μg∙mL−1 (VAL) and 250 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ, to prove the stability indicating nature of the method.
Samples were stressed intentionally to degrade, at the condition of UV light (200 watt hr/m2), Sun-light (1.2 Mill lux hrs), thermal (60˚C for 15 hr), acid (1 N HCl at 60˚C for 12 hr), base (1 N NaOH at 60˚C for 12 hr), water (at 60˚C for 12 hr), oxidation (10% H2O2 at RT for 12 hr) and humidity (90% RH for 7 days) respectively to evaluate the ability of the proposed method to separate VAL and HCTZ from their degradation products. Using PDA detector the stress samples peak purity was checked for VAL and HCTZ peaks.
3.7. Linearity
Linearity test solutions for VAL, HCTZ and their impurities were prepared by diluting stock solutions to required concentrations. The solutions were prepared at ten concentration levels from LOQ to 200% of the specification level 1.0% for HCTZ-1, 0.5% for HCTZ-2 & HCTZ-3, 0.2% for VAL-1, VAL-2, and VAL & HCTZ. The peak area versus concentration data was treated by least-squares linear regression analysis.
3.8. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Quantification (LOQ)
The LOD and LOQ for VAL and HCTZ and their impurities were determined at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1 and 10:1, respectively, by injecting a series of dilute solutions with known concentrations. Precision study was also carried out at the LOQ level by injecting six individual preparations and calculated % RSD.
3.9. Accuracy
Standards of VAL, HCTZ and their impurities were spiked at different concentration levels namely LOQ, 50%, 100%,150% and 200% of the specification level with respect to their test concentration in triplicate and evaluated for accuracy of impurities. The percentage of recoveries for VAL, HCTZ and their impurities were calculated.
3.10. Precision
The precision of the method was verified by injecting six individual preparations of dosage form (VAL 160 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg) spiked with its impurities of their specification level. VAL impurities are spiked at 0.2% with respect to VAL concentration 1600 μg∙mL−1 and HCTZ impurities are spiked at 1.0% (for HCTZ-1) and 0.5% (for HCTZ-2 & HCTZ-3) with respect to HCTZ concentration 250 μg∙mL−1. % RSD of each impurity was calculated.
The same experiment was repeated on different day with different chromatographic system and different analyst to find variability.
3.11. Robustness
To determine the robustness of the method, experimental conditions were deliberately altered and the tailing factors, resolution between VAL, HCTZ and their impurities were recorded. The effect of flow rate was evaluated at 0.9 and 1.1 mL∙min−1 instead of 1.0 mL∙min−1. The effect of the column temperature was studied at 20˚C and 30˚C instead of 25˚C.
4. Results & Discussion4.1. Method Development
The main target of the chromatographic method is to get the separation of impurities namely HCTZ-1, HCTZ-2, HCTZ-3 and HCTZ-4 of HCTZ & VAL-1 and VAL-2 of VAL and the degradation products generated during stress studies from the analyte peaks along with the actives.
A blended solution containing VAL impurities are spiked at 0.2% with respect to VAL concentration of 1600 μg∙mL−1 and HCTZ impurities are spiked at 1.0% (for HCTZ-1) and 0.5% (for HCTZ-2, HCTZ-3 & HCTZ-4) with respect to HCTZ concentration of 250 μg∙mL−1 was prepared in diluent and used for the method’s development. Initial experiments were performed using USP drug product monograph, with acetonitrile:water:Trifluoroacetic acid (10:90:0.1 v/v/v) as solvent-A and acetonitrile:water: Trifluoroacetic acid (90:10:0.1 v/v/v) as solvent-B with two different brand chromatographic columns namely ACE-5 & Hypersil Gold (C-18, 125-mm 3.0-mm, 5 µm particles) and found HCTZ-1, HCTZ-2 peaks merged together and closely eluted to HCTZ peak, and HCTZ-1 impurity peak shape found not sharp.
Further changed 0.1% OPA (Ortho phosphoric acid) as solvent-A and 100% acetonitrile as solvent-B and experiments were performed using different C18 brand columns namely Hypersil BDS C18, Inertsil ODS-3V, Waters symmetry shield RP-18 and Zorbax SB C18 having dimensions 250 mm, 4.6 mm, 5 µm particles. And results found HCTZ-1, HCTZ-2 peak shapes not symmetric except with Waters symmetry shield RP-18 column.
Using 0.1% TFA (Trifluoroacetic acid) as solvent-A in place of 0.1% OPA, experiments were performed using same brand C18 columns Hypersil BDS C18, Waters symmetry shield RP-18 and Zorbax SB C18 having dimensions 250 mm, 4.6 mm, 5 µm particles. Results found HCTZ-1, HCTZ-2 peak shapes not symmetric except with Waters symmetry shield RP-18 column.
Among these experiments, 0.1% OPA as solvent-A and 100% acetonitrile as solvent-B using Waters symmetry shield RP-18, 250 mm, 4.6 mm, 5 µm particles column had shown better resolution, peak shapes and responses. However to improve the resolution between HCTZ-1; HCTZ-2 & HCTZ peaks, effect of variations was studied with respect to flow rate and column oven temperature. Trial chromatograms are shown in Figures 3(A)-(C).
Typical chromatograms of valsartan at 265 nm (forced degradation study) (A. valsartan acid degradation; B. valsartan base degradation; C. valsartan peroxide degradation and D. valsartan heat degradation); Typical chromatograms of valsartan at 265 nm (forced degradation study) (E. valsartan uv-light degradation; F. valsartan sun-light degradation; G. valsartan humidity degradation and H. valsartan water degradation).
Based on the experiments with different gradient programs a gradient program (Tmin/%B) was set as 0/10, 5/10, 20/60, 40/60, 41/10 and 50/10 at detection wavelength 265 nm with the mobile phase consists of solvent-A (0.1% OPA) and solvent-B (100% acetonitrile), using Waters symmetry shield RP-18, 250 × 4.6 mm; 5 µm column was found suitable for separation of VAL, HCTZ and its impurities from each other at column oven temperature of 25˚C. The resolution between any two consecutive peaks is more than 2.0 and shapes of all peaks were found symmetric.
The above chromatographic conditions were suitable in separating VAL, HCTZ and its impurities from one other. Details of relative retention time, relative response factor, resolution and tailing factor values are summarized in Table 1.
4.2. Wavelength Justification
Wavelength was selected based on wavelength maxima of VAL, HCTZ and their known impurities UV spectrums. VAL and HCTZ have wavelength maxima at about 260 - 270 nm and their known impurities have sufficient absorbance for the measurement. Hence the 265 nm was selected as suitable wavelength for the estimation of impurities. The UV spectrums of VAL, HCTZ and their impurities has presented in Figure 4(A) & Figure 4(B).
4.3. Method Validation
Validation was performed on the developed analytical method for its acceptable performance to ensure suitability of intend purpose. The validation parameters like accuracy, precision, specificity, detection limit, quantification limit, linearity, range, ruggedness and robustness were executed and established method conditions to meet the requirements to execute the analysis of VAL and HCTZ combination dosage product. Linearity, limit of quantification, limit of detection, precision, intermediate precision at LOQ and percentage recovery of VAL, HCTZ and their impurities were established and presented.
Peak details
Compound
RT (min)
RRT*
RRF (Relative Response Factor)
Resolution
Tailing Factor
HCTZ-1
11.734
0.87
1.15
N/A
1.22
HCTZ-2
12.593
0.94
0.47
2.56
1.19
HCTZ
13.389
1.0
1.0
3.08
0.99
HCTZ-3
16.476
1.23
0.58
14.85
1.06
HCTZ-4
18.396
1.37
1.0
11.62
1.04
VAL-1
22.008
0.95
1.16
23.38
1.09
VAL
23.207
1.0
1.0
5.02
1.06
VAL-2
32.612
1.40
0.93
25.08
1.02
*Relative retention times (RRT) for HCTZ-1, HCTZ-2, HCTZ-3 & HCTZ-4 were calculated against the retention time (RT) of HCTZ and for VAL-1 & VAL-2 were calculated against the retention time (RT) of VAL.
Typical chromatograms of hydrochlorothiazide at 265 nm (forced degradation study) (A. HCTZ Acid degradation; B. HCTZ Base degradation; C. HCTZ Peroxide degradation and D. HCTZ Heat degradation); Typical chromatograms of hydrochlorothiazide at 265 nm (forced degradation study) (E. HCTZ UV-Light degradation; F. HCTZ Sun-Light degradation; G. HCTZ Humidity degradation and H. HCTZ Water degradation).
4.4. Solution Stability
The variability in the estimation of VAL and HCTZ impurities were within ±10% during solution stability experiment. The results from solution stability experiments confirmed that standard and sample solutions were stable up to 48 hrs.
4.5. Specificity: Results of Forced Degradation Studies
All forced degradation samples were analyzed at an initial concentration 1600 μg∙mL−1 of VAL and 250 μg∙mL−1 of HCTZ with LC conditions using PDA detector to ensure the homogeneity and purity of VAL and HCTZ peaks. Under the specificity experiment samples were stressed at various stress conditions and analyzed along with unstressed samples (Figure 5 & Figure 6). HCTZ degraded significantly at particular conditions. HCTZ-1 & HCTZ-2 impurities were significantly increased at Acid hydrolysis (1 N HCl at 60˚C for 12 hr), Base Hydrolysis (1 N NaOH at 60˚C for 12 hr) and at water hydrolysis (at 60˚C for 12 hr) condition (Figure 6(A), Figure 6(B) & Figure 6(H)).
(A) Method development trial chromatograms column study USP Method (a. ACE 5; C18; 125*3.0 mm; 5 µm; b. Hypersil Gold C18; 125*3.0 mm; 5 µm); (B) Method development trial chromatograms column study, 0.1% OPA as Solvent-A (a. Hypersil BDS-C18; 250*4.6 mm; 5 µm; b. Inertsil ODS-3V; 250*4.6 mm; 5 µm ; c. Waters Symmetry Shield-RP18; 250*4.6 mm; 5µm and d. Zorbax SB-C18; 250*4.6 mm; 5 µm); (C) Method development trial chromatograms column study, 0.1% TFA as Solvent-A (a. Hypersil BDS-C18; 250*4.6 mm; 5 µm; b. Waters Symmetry Shield-RP18; 250*4.6 mm; 5 µm and c. Zorbax SB-C18; 250*4.6 mm; 5 µm).
(A) UV Spectrum of VAL and their impurities (a. VAL; b. VAL-1; c. VAL-2); (B) UV Spectrum of HCTZ and their impurities (a. HCTZ; b. HCTZ-1; c. HCTZ-2); (B) UV Spectrum of HCTZ impurities (d. HCTZ-3; e. HCTZ-4).
The peak purity test result derived from photo diode array detector (PDA) confirmed that VAL and HCTZ peaks were pure and homogeneous in all the analyzed stress conditions and thus confirms the stability-indicating power of the developed method. Results of forced degradation studies were reported in Table 2.
Specificity (results of forced degradation studies)
Stress condition (Degradation)
% of impurities formed
Peak purity†
HCTZ-1
HCTZ-2
HCTZ-3
HCTZ-4
VAL-1
VAL-2
Unknown
% Net degradation
20.520 RT
VAL
HCTZ
As such sample
0.1473
0.0277
0.0440
0.1279
0.0760
ND*
0.0283
N/A
999.848
999.993
Oxidation
0.1486
0.0254
0.0427
0.1334
0.0746
ND
0.0284
0.00
999.842
999.992
Acid
2.1784
0.0592
0.0419
0.0075
0.0752
ND
0.0285
2.01
999.843
999.993
Base
14.1829
0.1083
0.0365
0.0047
0.0747
ND
0.0286
13.99
999.838
999.994
Thermal
0.1471
0.0283
0.0433
0.1308
0.0760
ND
0.0256
0.00
999.832
999.993
Water
0.9975
0.0315
0.0423
0.0148
0.0754
ND
0.0291
0.76
999.834
999.994
UV
0.1470
0.0275
0.0415
0.1286
0.0754
ND
0.0257
0.00
999.841
999.993
SUN
0.1473
0.0290
0.0426
0.1310
0.0752
ND
0.0278
0.00
999.844
999.993
Humidity
0.1441
0.0234
0.0419
0.1189
0.0748
ND
0.0254
0.02
999.843
999.993
*ND―Not Detected; N/A―Not Applicable; † Peak purity numbers represented as per Agilent Chemstation software algorithm. Peak is pure only if purity value is more than 990.
4.6. Linearity
Linear calibration plot for impurities was obtained over the calibration ranges tested, i.e. LOQ to 200% for impurities. The correlation coefficient obtained was greater than 0.998 (Table 3). The above result shows that an excellent correlation existed between the peak area and the concentration of all five impurities.
4.7. Limits of Detection and Quantification
The limit of detection and limit of quantification values were established based on the signal to noise ratios. Precision at LOQ values for VAL and HCTZ and its five impurities were established and reported in Table 3.
4.8. Precision
The result of all the impurities (HCTZ-1, HCTZ-2, HCTZ-3, VAL-1 and VAL-2) in re- peatability study was showed less than 15% RSD for each individual impurity. Data of repeat experiment was showed less than 2.3% RSD for impurities. These results are conforming good precision of the method. The % RSD values are presented in Table 3.
4.9. Accuracy
The percentage recovery of impurities varied from 97.6% to 102.4% in the analysis of impurities. The % recovery values for VAL and HCTZ and their impurities are found accurate throughout the range selected.
4.10. Robustness
In all the deliberate varied chromatographic conditions like flow rate (−0.1 mL∙min−1
Regression and precision data
PARAMETER
VAL
HCTZ
VAL-1
VAL-2
HCTZ-1
HCTZ-2
HCTZ-3
LOD (μg/mL)
0.100
0.006
0.028
0.108
0.006
0.026
0.015
LOQ (μg/mL)
0.303
0.019
0.085
0.327
0.017
0.080
0.047
Correlation coefficient
0.9999
0.9998
0.9999
0.9999
1.0000
0.9999
1.0000
Bias at 100 % response
1.0368
−0.7663
0.6896
0.5841
−0.6679
0.6185
0.1819
Precision (%RSD)
1.3
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.3
0.8
0.9
Intermediate precision (%RSD)
1.2
1.4
1.3
1.9
1.5
1.6
0.8
Precision at LOQ (%RSD)
1.3
1.0
2.3
1.5
1.2
2.2
1.8
and +0.1 mL∙min−1 of 1.0 mL∙min−1) column temperature (±5˚C of 25˚C) all the analytes were adequately resolved and elution orders remained unchanged. The resolution between all pair compounds was greater than 2.0 and tailing factor for VAL and HCTZ and their impurities was less than 1.5. The variability in the estimation of VAL and HCTZ impurities was within ±10%.
5. Conclusion
The rapid gradient RP-HPLC method developed for quantitative analysis of VAL and HCTZ and related substances in pharmaceutical dosage form is precise, accurate, linear, robust and specific. Satisfactory results were obtained from validation of the method. The method is stability-indicating and can be used for routine analysis of production samples to check the stability [23] of VAL and HCTZ in FDC tablet dosage form.
Cite this paper
Ganthi, H.K.R., Reddy P, R., Park, Y.J., Park, S.J. and Cho, W.H. (2016) Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Quantification of Impurities in Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide FDC Tablet Dosage Form. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 7, 816-839. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2016.711072
Referenceshttp://www.rxlist.com/diovan-hct-drug.htmThe United States Pharmacopoeia 39 NF34 First Supplement.The European Pharmacopoeia 8.0.Macek, J., Klima, J. and Ptacek, P. (2006) Rapid Determination of Valsartan in Human Plasma by Protein Precipitation and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B, 832, 169-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.12.035Daneshtalab, N., Lewanczuk, R.Z. and Jamali, F. (2002) High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist Valsartan Using a Liquid Extraction Method. Journal of Chromatography B, 766, 345-349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00507-2Takar, S. and Saglik, S. (2002) Comparison of UV and Second Derivative-Spectrophoto-metric and LC Methods for the Determination of Valsartan in Pharmaceutical Formulation. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 30, 371-375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00360-6Rao, K.S., Jena, N. and Rao, M. (2010) Development and Validation of a Specific Stability Indicating High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for Valsartan. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2, 183-189. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.63166Niopas, I. and Daftsios, A.C. (2002) A Validated HPLC Method for the Determination of Hydrochlorothiazide in Human Plasma & Its Application in Pharmacokinetic Studies. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 25, 487-494.
https://doi.org/10.1081/JLC-120008762Morra, V., Davita, P., Capra, P., Vincenti, M., Distilo, A. and Botrè, F. (2006) Fast Gas Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometric Determination of Diuretics & Masking Agents in Human Urine: Development and Validation of a Protective Screening Protocol for Antidoping Analysis. Journal of Chromatography A, 1135, 219-229.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.034Hillaert, S. and Van den Bossche, W. (2003) Simultaneous Determination of Hydrochlorothiazide and Several Angiotensin-II-Receptor Antagonists by Capillary Electrophoresis. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 31, 329-339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(02)00643-XSatana, E., Altinay, S., Goger, N.G., Ozkan, S.A. and Senturk, Z. (2001) Simultaneous Determination of Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in Tablets by First-Derivative Ultraviolet Spectroscopy and LC. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 25, 1009-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00394-6Antil, P., Kaushik, D., Jain, G., Srinivas, K.S. and Thakur, I. (2013) UPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Valsartan & Hydrochlorothiazide in Drug Products. Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques, 4, 182.Gonzalez, L., Lopez, J.A., Alonso, R.M. and Jimenez, R.M. (2002) Fast Screening Method for the Determination of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist in Human Plasma by High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorimetric Detection. Journal of Chromatography A, 949, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01496-0Liu, F., Zhang, J., Xu, Y., Gao, S. and Guo, Q. (2008) Simultaneous Determination of Hydrochlorothiazide and Valsartan in Human Plasma by Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Letters, 41, 1348-1365.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00032710802119186Li, H., Wang, Y., Jiang, Y., Tang, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, L. and Gu, J. (2007) A Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Simultaneous Quantification of Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in Human Plasma. Journal of Chromatography B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 852, 436-442.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.02.014Hillaert, S. and Bossche, W. (2002) Optimization and Validation of a Capillary Zone Electrophoretic Method for the Analysis of Several Angiotensin-II-Receptor Antagonists. Journal of Chromatography A, 979, 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01247-5Hillaert, S., De Beer, T.R.M., De Beer, J.O. and Van den Bossche, W. (2003) Optimization and Validation of a Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatographic Method for the Analysis of Several Angiotensin-II-Receptor Antagonists. Journal of Chromatography A, 984, 135-146.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01832-0Anandakumar, K. and Jayamariappan, M. (2011) Absorption Correction Method for the Simultaneous Estimation of Amlodipine Besylate, Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in Bulk and in Combined Tablet Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3, 23-27.Kharoaf, M., Malkieh, N., Abualhasan, M., Shubitah, R., Jaradat, N. and Zaid, A.N. (2012) Tablet Formulation and Development of a Validated Stability Indicating Method for Quantification of Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide Combination. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4, 284-290.Zhang, H. and Ding, S.-T. (2012) Determination of Related Substance in Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide Dispersible Tablets by HPLC Gradient Elution Method. Food and Drug, 14, 42-44.Chen, X.-W. and Liu, A.-L. (2012) Determination of Related Substances in Valsartan Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets. Qilu Pharmaceutical Affairs, 31.International Council on Harmonization (ICH) (2005) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). IFPMA, Geneva.International Council on Harmonization (ICH) (2003) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A(R2). IFPMA, Geneva.