<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Sensor Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-122X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jst.2016.64010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JST-72241</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Exponential Stabilization and Estimation for Sampled Observer Design of Surface Mounted Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>A. R. Al-Tahir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Electrical Engineering Department, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>10</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>2,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>21,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>24,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A nonlinear state observer design with sampled and delayed output measurements for variable speed and external load torque estimations of SPMSM drive system has been addressed, successfully. Sampled output state predictor is re-initialized at each sampling instant and remains continuous between two sampling instants. Throughout this study, a positive constant to satisfy an upper limit of the sampling period between sampling instants and allowable timing delay in terms of observer parameters has been prepared such that the exponential stable of the closed-loop system is guaranteed, based on 
  Lyapunov stability tools. In order to validate the theoretical results introduced by main fundamental theorem to prove the observer convergence, the proposed sampled-data observer is demonstrated through a sample study application to variable speed SPMSM drive system.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Stability</kwd><kwd> SPMSM</kwd><kwd> Sampled Output Observer</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Lyapunov&lt;/i&gt; Stability</kwd><kwd> Intelligent Sensor</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent decays, synchronous machines are used in variable speed motoring and the manufacturers had been made synchronous machines based on permanent magnets in wide power range with various categories and structures. On the other hand, an efficient development has been considered in the field of power electronics technology; it has made the task of flexible rotor speed variation a realizable target. In effect, PMSMs are more efficient for applications demanding rotor speed reversion. Synchronous machine is convenient for drive applications, when these applications involve wide power variation. To this end, PMSMs have been made controllable through inverters since these inverters have the possibility of interconnection between electrical grid and three-phase machines and they are capable to ensure smooth output voltage. The latter allow the control of stator phases switching action, depending on the electrical rotor position, so that the PMS motors operate with time-varying speed. The inverters are acted on using controllers, but these need online measurements of the rotor speed and load torque [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref1">1</xref>] . The point is that mechanical sensors are costly and may not be sufficiently reliable. Accordingly, state observers have been reported in recent years to get online estimates of mechanical variables based on on-line measurements of the electrical variables. Various design approaches had been used to obtain mechanical senseless observers for PMSMs. One of the design approaches dealing with the identification and investigation of eddy current effects on motor rotor position observation had been claimed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref2">2</xref>] . The authors tried to improve high frequency injection approach based on self-sensing control of a PMSM drive system at stand still and low rotor speed. This approach is not recommended for high rotor speed applications and LFI. On the other hand, some of excitation strategies had been recommended by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref3">3</xref>] that rely on the detection of the rotor position from the stator voltages and currents without requiring additional test signals. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref4">4</xref>] , the back EMF (waveform of the voltage induced in stator windings) had been used to estimate rotor position by means of state observers or Kalman filters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref5">5</xref>] . This approach works well in medium and high speed applications, but it is not accurate at low operation when the back EMF is low. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref6">6</xref>] , Kalman-like interconnected observers have been designed that estimate the machine position and speed. However, these observers are complex (computation time consuming), and their convergence analysis relies on an excitation condition involving the observer signals (e.g. the state estimates). More specifically, an interconnected observer is in fact composed of two observers and the persistent excitation condition of one observer involves the state estimates provided by the other. As a matter of fact, suitable conditions are those involving the system signals (system input and output) not the observer signals.</p><p>Recently, the problem of global exponential stabilization of nonlinear systems has received a great deal attention in the world. Consequently, this paper deals with designing of nonlinear sampled-data observers in the presence of sensorless measurements, all the mechanical state variables are considered inaccessible for measurements. As investigated in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref8">8</xref>] , some extra growth conditions on the unmeasurable states of the system are usually necessary for the global stabilization of nonlinear time delay systems. A Lyapunov-Krasovskii Functional (LKF) was suggested in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref9">9</xref>] , such that the relation between the delayed state variable and the number of cascade observers with specific vector gain were introduced. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref11">11</xref>] claimed that several authors extended the result in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref9">9</xref>] to a time-varying delay system with observer and provided a maximum allowable time delay in terms of observer design parameters.</p><p>A sampled-data control of nonlinear systems using high-gain observers is introduced by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref12">12</xref>] . The state observer is performed in continuous-time mode and then it is discretized for digital implementation using three different discretization methods.</p><p>Sufficient conditions for time-varying delays were derived via Razumikhin approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref13">13</xref>] , which leads to more conservative results than Krasovskii method. For systems with constant delays, sufficient conditions were derived in terms of LKF in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref14">14</xref>] . Published studies concerning with the design of continuous-time high-gain observers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref16">16</xref>] dealing with dynamical high-gain observers for continuous-time systems are designed.</p><p>In present paper, one looks for accurate observation of the unmeasured mechanical state variables, which are angular rotated speed and external load torque for surface permanent magnet synchronous motor SPMSM, supposing the stator current and voltage to be accessible for measurements. To this end, a sampled-data nonlinear state observer will be designed with sampled and delayed output measurements coupled with inter-sampled output state prediction. The proposed observer will prove to be exponentially convergent in presence of wide range variations. The proposed observer is capable to ensure efficient tracking response. The proposed observer is formally proved through a main result based on tools of Lyapunov stability approach.</p><p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In the next section, the problem formulation of SPMSM will be provided. The Third section is devoted to the observer design and stability analysis with sampled and delayed measurements is provided by using a Lyapunov stability approach. Then the equations of the state observer used for SPMSM are given. In this section, the problem statement which leads us to prove the exponential convergence of the global exponential stabilization and state estimation of nonlinear systems coupled with sampled?data observer design based on main theorem. The forth section is simulation results and verifications. Finally, conclusions are given in section five.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Problem Formulation</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Reduced Model of SPMSM</title><p>Dynamic modelling is needed for various types of analysis related to system dynamics: stability, control system, and optimization. The SPMSM model is constructed in (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) stationary reference frame. Notice that, the time derivative of the external input load torque is considered by an unknown bounded function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The control objective is to determine under what sufficient conditions that all the SPMSM states variables, which are, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and T<sub>L</sub> can be determined from the motor input and output measurements, namely the stator current and the motor input command voltage signal, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>A mathematical model of the synchronous motor is highly desirable to obtain an overview on the complex electromagnetic behavior of the motor, and perform the simulation or controller synthesis. A model based on the electrical and mechanical equations are usually sufficient to synthesize the system model. SPMSM nonlinear system model is given by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref17">17</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula205"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are respectively,</p><p>the stator vector of currents, the rotor fluxes and the motor input command signals. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and T<sub>L</sub> respectively, denote the rotor speed and the load torque, which is unknown but constant and that its upper bound is available. J and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the moment of inertia and viscous friction; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the number of magnetic pole pairs. The electrical parameters, R<sub>s</sub> and L<sub>s</sub> are the armature resistor and inductance, respectively. The electromagnetic torque, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is indirect measurable output state. This can be evaluated through the first term of third subsystem given in (1). One can write the system under study of SPMSM as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula206"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>This model can be re-written under the form taking into account that the electromagnetic torque <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is not accessible to measurement all the time, only sampled? data measurements, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are available:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula207"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, the state vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>To clarify the general procedure related with this study, a flow block diagram of study method and its application to sensorless SPMSM drive system is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. System Construction in z Benchmark</title><p>Let us provide the following state transformation to put the system model in observable normal form as follows:</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x25.png" /><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x24.png" /></p><p>such that, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is diffeomorphism.</p><p>Let us put the following system in the z benchmark after doing state transformation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula208"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>that is,</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> A flow block diagram of study method applied on variable speed SPMSM.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x30.png"/></fig></fig-group><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula209"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula210"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula211"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula212"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula213"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Before the observer synthesis for our physical system model given in (4) is designed, some technical assumptions have to be stated. Such hypothesis have vital role for the next results.</p><p>H<sub>1</sub>: The functions, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are locally Lipschitz and globally bounded with respect to z in domain of interest, uniformly in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>we can easily write the following:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula214"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that the functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may contain linear parts and the dynamics <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> depends on all state variables <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> through the Lipchitz function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>H<sub>2</sub>: Throughout this paper the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is unknown periodic bounded and the real <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the upper bound of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref18">18</xref>] : Let us consider that the input <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is regularly persistent for system given in (4) and assuming the Lyapunov differential equation stated in (10), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>so that for any symmetric positive definite matrix S(0), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Also, by choosing<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, one has <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Observer Structure</title><p>In this subsection, the following sampled-data observer is proposed for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The main difference compared with third class of nonlinear system given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref19">19</xref>] resides in the presentation of state observer with the effect of external disturbance. As a matter of fact, the authors in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref20">20</xref>] focused in case of linear systems and without taken into consideration the state predictor.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula215"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula216"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula217"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula218"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The output sampled data observer defined from (9)-(12) consists of a classical observer and output predictor for sampled and delayed measurements where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the continuous estimates of the states. The predictor w is reset (re-initialized) at each sampling instant. S is SPD matrix and continuous in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Now, one shall prove in the next theorem that the proposed observer is a global exponential observer for system given in (4) with the sampled and delayed measurements in output state vector, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is set of natural numbers. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows single line diagram of proposed study with sampled and time delayed state observer.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Single line diagram of proposed study with sampled and time delayed state observer</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x67.png"/></fig><p>Theorem (Main Result): Let us consider the system described by the set of differential equation given by (4), and hypothesis H<sub>1</sub>, H<sub>2</sub> hold. This leads us for constant maximum allowable sampling period <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and upper bound limit of admissible timing delay <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in output state measurements as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula219"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula220"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The sampled output-data observer given in Equations (9)-(12) is global exponential observer for system (4) as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for sufficient large positive value of observer design parameter, satisfying,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof of theorem: The searcher shall give formal analysis of the main theorem using Lyapunov stability approach. For writing convenience, the variable t can be cancelled. Set observation error:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then one shall obtain from Equations (9)-(12) and (4) the following new dynamics error system as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula221"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Throughout this paper, let us define the following quantities:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula222"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula223"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thanks to Newton Leibniz integration formula that it will be used in next equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula224"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then the error dynamics given by (15) can be re-formulated as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula225"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let us define the following LKF, provided by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72241-ref20">20</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula226"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula227"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a positive design parameter and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a piecewise differentiable positive function designed for the purpose of correcting the error between the predictor and the output such that, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>satisfies the following conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula228"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To show the exponential convergence of the observation error, it is necessary to prepare conditions for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to guarantee that:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula229"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula230"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the fact that the observation error <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous and the error <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then it is clear that the inequality defined in (22) is performed.</p><p>Now, let us decomposes the Lyapunov function into four functions, which are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula231"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, the time derivative of the first Lyapunov function is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula232"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combining (10) and (19) for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively, yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula233"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the fact that,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula234"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This will give,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula235"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thanks to Jensen’s inequality, one has:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula236"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This leads us to get the following result,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula237"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In view of Lemma, one deduce <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula238"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And, the time derivative of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given in (30) is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula239"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On the other hand from (9)-(12), one can easily conclude that:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula240"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>That is, the system (31) becomes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula241"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Likewise, the time derivative of third Lyapunov function in (24) is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula242"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The time derivative of the prediction error given in (16) is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula243"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (11) and (29) with the assistance of the Newton Leibniz integration formula stated in (18) and using H<sub>2</sub>, one gets:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula244"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Therefore, the first term of (34) becomes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula245"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using once again Jenson’s inequality given in (28), and using, H<sub>3</sub>, yields:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula246"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So, combining Equation (38) in (34), one has:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula247"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, from equations (30), (31) and (39), one has the following</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula248"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(40)</p><p>Thus, the exponential convergence of the observation error is guaranteed if the following conditions successfully achieved:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula249"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula250"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula251"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To derive the, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, let us consider<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, this implies, (41) becomes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula252"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula253"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Furthermore, one selects the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a saw tooth function for, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Consequently, the proposed condition in (42) is performed if,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula254"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This leads us that the sampling interval must be smaller than<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Using (45), the proposed maximum admissible sampling interval is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula255"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On other hand, from condition (43), the corresponding admissible timing delay,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72241-formula256"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(47)</p><p>It is obvious that if Equations (45), (46) and (47) are performed successfully, the proposed conditions given in Equations (41), (42), (43) and (44) are satisfied in the same way. Thus the observation error of the system under study tends exponentially towards the origin as the time increasing towards infinity. This ends proof of theorem.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Simulation Results</title><p>In this section, the dynamic performances of the proposed sampled data observer accompanied by sampled and delayed output measurements for online estimation of SPMSM state variables, which are motor rotor speed and external load torque. SPMSM has been implemented under MATLAB/Simulink environment. The tool selected for solving the dynamic equations is the MATLAB function called ODE45.</p><p>The system dynamics have been described by third order nonlinear dynamic model given in Equation (2) for SPMSM. A proposed sampled-data observer of the nonlinear system is given by (9) accompanied by sampled and delayed output measurements as a practicable solution for sensorless variable speed control of SPMSM is proposed to get on line estimates of all mechanical state variables in SPMSM. The sampled data observer stated in system (9) is implemented using realistic benchmark MATLAB/Simulink resources. The observer design parameters are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The dynamic performance depends on the numerical value given to the observer design parameters, constant sampling period, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>between sampling instants and allowable timing delay. The selection of the tuning parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is performed using try and error procedure. This value has been bounded to 200 as listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> when simulating sampled?data nonlinear observer given in Equation (9). From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the electrical time constant is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> accordingly, a suitable value of the allowable timing delay would be 6 ms. A time delay of 6 ms appears be sufficient to exceed transient stability. The summarized results for sampled-data observer design parameters <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The nonlinear observer dynamic performances for complete one cycle of (50 s). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows reference rotor speed in (rad/sec) to guarantee control strategy. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> clarifies the external load torque profile in (N∙m). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> illustrates real electromagnetic torque and its estimates. On the other hand, the rotor speed and load torque tracking performances are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, respectively. The output state prediction error is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. It is apparent that the output electromagnetic torque and its prediction is decreased and increased simultaneously with variation of angular rotated speed. Thus, the observation errors resulting from technical hypothesis H<sub>1</sub>, H<sub>2</sub> are practically acceptable as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0. It should be mentioned that the dynamic tracking performance of the proposed sampled and delayed observer is quite satisfactory. From these figures, the error dynamics are exponentially convergence to origin and the closed-loop sample study is globally asymptotically stable GAS with time progressive.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Nominal SPMSM characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Symbol</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DC/AC converter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>dc </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600 V</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Modulation Frequency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >f<sub>m </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 Hz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nominal Torque</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 N∙m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nominal flux</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0. 979 Wb</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stator resistance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. 43 Ω</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stator inductance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.6 mH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rotor and load viscous damping coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003819 N∙m/rad/s</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moment of inertia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >J</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02765 N∙m/rad/s<sup>2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of pole pairs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Values of the observer design parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Index</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Observer design</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling period</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 ms</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Timing delay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 ms</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Reference speed in (rad/sec)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x155.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Load torque profile in (N∙m)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x156.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Real T<sub>em</sub> and its estimate</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x157.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Rotor speed and its estimate</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x158.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Load torque and its estimate</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x159.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction error of T<sub>em</sub></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x160.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Observation of rotor speed</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x161.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Observation of load torque</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x162.png"/></fig><p>The initial conditions of the matrices <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is set as, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is identity matrix and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is symmetric positive definite matrix and solution of the Lyapunov equation. The initial conditions of the system states are chosen:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and the corresponding observer states are chosen as,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A solution of the Lyapunov equation given by</p><p>Equation (10) is: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the binomial coefficient. The simulations have been achieved successfully with stator inputs in stationary reference frame are, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-4200185x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The simulation results for our case study claimed that the proposed sampled-data observer has acceptable transient response, with influence of sampled and delayed output measurement, accurate tracking response and robustness of observer performance for unknown mechanical torque.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this study, synthesis of nonlinear hybrid state observer for a class of MIMO systems accompanied by sampled and delayed output measurements has been achieved successfully. The observer convergence is formally analyzed and clarified by numerical simulation of surface mounted PMSM drive system. As already mentioned, mechanical sensors based solutions are most costly and unreliable. Then, state observers turn out to be a quite natural alternative to get estimates of mechanical variables using only measurable electrical state variables. The proposed observer provides estimates of the mechanical state variables (rotor speed, load torque) using stator currents and voltages measurements. The numerical results presented in this paper are interesting and could be practically useful from the view point of engineers. The searcher provided an upper bound of constant sampling period and allowable timing delay with sufficient large value of observer synthesis parameter that will ensure the global exponential convergence of the observation and prediction errors towards zero using Lyapunov stability theory.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I greatly appreciate the financial support given from ministry of higher education and scientific research in Iraq to carry out this research.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Al-Tahir, A.A.R. (2016) Exponential Stabilization and Estimation for Sampled Observer Design of Surface Mounted Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor. Journal of Sensor Technology, 6, 122-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jst.2016.64010</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72241-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tety, P., Konaté, A., Asseu, O., Soro, E. and Yoboué, P. (2016) An Extended Sliding Mode Observe for Speed, Position and Torque Sensorless Control for PMSM Drive Based Stator Resistance Estimator. Intelligent Control and Automation, 7, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ica.2016.71001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, J.G., Xu, L.Y. and Liu, J.B. (2006) Eddy Current Effects on Rotor Position Estimation for Sensorless Control of PM Synchronous Machine. IEEE Industry Applications Conference, Tampa, 8-12 October 2006, 2034-2039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ias.2006.256815</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bolognani, S., Oboe, R. and Zigliotto, M. (1999) Sensorless Full-Digital PMSM Drive with EKF Estimation of Speed and Rotor Position. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 46, 184-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/41.744410</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fakham, H., Djemai, M. and Busawon, K. (2005) Design and Practical Implementation of a Back-EMF Sliding-Mode Observer for a Brushless DC Motor. IET Electric Power Applications, 2, 807-813.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lang, B., Liu, W. and Luo, G. (2007) A New Observer of Stator Flux Linkage for Permanent magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Kalman Filter. 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 1813-1817.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezzat, M., Leon, J.D. and Glumineau, A. (2011) Sensorless Speed Control of PMSM via Interconnected Observer. International Journal of Control, 84, 1926-1943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2011.629684</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed-Ali, T., Karafyllis, I. and Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, F. (2013) Global Exponential Sampled-Data Observer for Nonlinear Systems with Delayed Measurements. System and Control Letters, 62, 539-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2013.03.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karafyllis, I., Krstic, M., Ahmed-Ali, T. and Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, F. (2014) Global Stabilization of Nonlinear Delay Systems with Compact Absorbing Set. International Journal of Control, Taylor &amp; Francis, 8, 1010-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2013.863433</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed-Ali, T., Cherrier, E. and M’Saad, M. (2010) High-Gain Observer for a Class of Time-Delay Nonlinear Systems. International Journal of Control, 83, 273-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207170903141069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed-Ali, T., Cherrier, E. and Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, F. (2012) Cascade High-Gain Predictors for a Class of Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Transaction on Automatic and Control, 57, 224-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2011.2161795</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Assche, V., Ahmed-Ali, T. and Hann, C.A. (2011) High-Gain Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems with Time Varying Delayed Measurements. 18th IFAC World Congress, 44, 692-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.02421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohammed Dabroom, A. and Khalil, H. (2001) Output Feedback Sampled-Data Control of Nonlinear Systems Using High-Gain Observers. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 46, 1712-1725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/9.964682</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teel, A. (1998) Connection between Razumikhin-Type Theorems and the ISS Nonlinear Small-Gain Theorems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 43, 960-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/9.701099</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pepe, P. (2007) On Liapunov-Krasovskii Functionals under Caratheodory Conditions. Automatica, 43, 701-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2006.10.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gauthier, J.P. and Kupka, I. (2001) Deterministic Observation Theory and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546648</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrieu, V., Parly, L. and Astolfi, A. (2009) High-Gain Observers with Updated Gain and Homogeneous Correction Terms. Automatica, 45, 422-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2008.07.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rashid, H. (2011) Power Electronics Handbook: Devices, Circuits, and Applications. 3rd Edition, Elsevier Inc., Academic Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Besancon, G., Bornard, G. and Hammouri, H. (1996) Observer Synthesis for a Class of Nonlinear Control Systems. European Journal of Control, 2, 176-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0947-3580(96)70043-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed-Ali, T., Van Assche, J., Massieu, V. and Dorleans, P. (2013) Continuous-Discrete Observer for State Affine Systems with Sampled and Delayed Measurements. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 58, 1085-1091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2012.2225555</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72241-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hespanha, P. and Xu, Y. (2007) A Survey of Recent Results in Networked Control Systems. IEEE Special Issue Technology Networked Control System, 95, 138-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2006.887288</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>