<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAPr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2329-8421</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapr.2016.44012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAPr-72240</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Very Compact Normal Mode Multiloop Helical Antenna with Enhanced Bandwidth
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antonis</surname><given-names>A. Constantinides</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Institute of Work Based Learning, Middlesex University, London, UK</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>etbroadcast@hotmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>159</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>21,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>24,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The physical size of an antenna becomes an important characteristic when receiving signals in bands with long wavelengths. Size determines two important aspects of antenna performance; impedance and efficiency. For example, the VHF antennas installed on radio sets that intended to receive FM or the latest technology Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) radio signals in Bands II, III respectively. Antennas that are installed on mobile platforms (i.e. portable receivers) require a receiver that utilizes a whip telescopic antenna with adjustable length which can operate as a λ/4 monopole antenna. Whereas, non-portable applications like a deck commercial receiver has no built in antenna due to the large size of the radiator needed and so must be connected with an external antenna. This paper presents a new design of a very small size Normal Mode Multiloop Helical Antenna (NMMHA) with superior performance developed for commercial receivers operate in band II, III. The major drawback which has been overcome with this design is the very narrow bandwidth of the Normal Mode Helical Antenna, which originally was optimized to provide the minimum Voltage Standing Wave Ratio VSWR response across Band II (87.5 - 108 MHz). The NMMHA’s size allows it to be a build in block of a deck commercial receiver.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Normal Mode Multiloop Helical Antenna</kwd><kwd> Radio services</kwd><kwd> Impedance</kwd><kwd> Bandwidth</kwd><kwd> Gain</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A helical antenna is an antenna consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a spring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref3">3</xref>] . When the Helix antenna diameter is much smaller than λ (for example, ≤0.1λ), it operates in a Normal Mode and is therefore defined as a Normal Mode Helical Antenna (NMHA). An NMHA can be mounted either vertically above a ground plane, or directly on a connector without grounding. The NMHA radiation pattern is identical to that of a monopole antenna (it is an omnidirectional side-fire radiation pattern, which is the desired radiation pattern in this application) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref3">3</xref>] . The many advantages of the NMHA relative to the short stub or the Hertzian dipole were discussed by Kraus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref3">3</xref>] . According to Kraus, the NMHA resonates at a much shorter physical length than does the monopole but in a very narrow bandwidth. In this respect, the axial ratio of the NMHA is given by Kraus (1988) in Equation (1) below:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72240-formula1"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where:</p><p>C: it is the circumference</p><p>Sλ: spacing between turns in wavelengths</p><p>The three special cases pertaining to the NMHA polarization sense are given as follows:</p><p>EΦ = 0 Linear Vertical Polarization</p><p>ΕΘ = 0 Linear Horizontal Polarization</p><p>EΦ = ΕΘ Circular Polarization</p><p>Wheeler’s relation for circular polarization is given by Equation (2):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72240-formula2"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x3.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Because a NMHA has very small dimensions, and therefore, it is an important antenna in all wireless communication engineering sectors where the physical size of the radiator plays a very significant role [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref4">4</xref>] . As a result, over the years, many researchers have attempted to increase the bandwidth of the NMHA by consisting of two strips [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref5">5</xref>] , applying the properties of a Log-Periodic arrays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref6">6</xref>] , or constructing the antenna of two flat wire strips [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref7">7</xref>] . This paper presents a new design of a very compact Normal Mode Multiloop Helical Antenna (NMMHA) with superior performance developed to operate in the VHF band II. The antenna consists of two sections―a multiloop antenna constructed on a PCB Fr-4 substrate material and a NMHA mounted in series as will be discussed in the following sections.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Measured and Simulated Results of the NMHA</title><p>An NMHA depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> was constructed as a part of this study in order to test its performance in real conditions and compare it with that of the quarter-wavelength monopole, the construction details of which are discussed in the next section.</p><p>The three vital parameters of the NMHA under investigation are the radiation resistance, the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) response and the “Gain” at the operational frequency of the commercial band FM (87.5 - 108 MHz).</p><p>The construction details of the NMHA are given below:</p><p>Diameter = 33 mm (0.01λ)</p><p>N = 9 turns</p><p>S = 4 mm</p><p>Height = 40 mm (0.013λ)</p><p>Wire Diameter = 2 mm</p><p>Pitch Angle: 7 Degrees</p><p>In order to determine the Axial Ratio (AR) of the antenna, Equation (3) can be used:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72240-formula3"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The radiation resistance (Rs, the real part of the impedance) has been measured by the use of the VSWR analyzer MFJ 269C and the results are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. As can be seen from the graph, at 93 MHz, the radiation resistance is close to 50'Ω. At other frequencies within the Band II, the radiation resistance becomes very low; thus, the antenna has a very narrow band response [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72240-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>This is further illustrated by the VSWR response curve shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> which has been measured experimentally by the MFJ 269C as well, that takes into account the imaginary part of the impedance.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The normal mode helical antenna</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The radiation resistance of the NMHA</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> The VSWR response of the NMHA</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x7.png"/></fig><p>According to the graph shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the VSWR response of the NMHA makes it usable in the 90 - 96 MHz range, equivalent to 5:1 VSWR. Moreover, as the VSWR response exceeds 25:1 in the beginning and at the end of the Band II, the antenna cannot be used for broadband applications. The poor VSWR response of the NMHA also affects the gain response, examined below.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Measured and Simulated Results of the NMHA over the Quarter Wavelength Monopole Antenna</title><p>The reception performance of the NMHA in real conditions (with “on air” existing radio services) versus a quarter-wavelength vertically polarized monopole antenna has been measured experimentally and simulated with the Excel program as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. In order to perform the test, each antenna was mounted at the same point on a ground plane and the results were obtained via the Advantest U3751 spectrum analyzer. According to the data reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the NMHA has an average gain of −4.7 dB relative to that of the quarter-wavelength monopole.</p><p>The gain ranged from −2 dB to −7 dB. The poor NMHA performance is attributed to the high VSWR response, as previously discussed.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion―The Performance of the NMMHA</title><p>This section is dedicated to the discussion of the performance of the Normal Mode Multiloop Helical antenna (NMMHA), which was constructed with smallest physical dimensions possible. The NMMHA is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. As can be seen from the image, the antenna consists of two sections―a multiloop antenna constructed on a PCB Fr-4 substrate material and a NMHA mounted in series. The longest turn’s side dimension of the planar helix is 80 mm and the total number of turns is 13.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The gain of the NMHA versus that of the quarter-wavelength monopole antenna</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (MHz)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Helix (dBuV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Monopole (dBuV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ΔG (dBuV)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> The normal mode multiloop helical antenna</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x8.png"/></fig><p>The NMMHA’s construction details are given below:</p><p>Diameter = 33 mm (0.011λ)</p><p>N = 5 turns</p><p>Height: = 50 mm (0.01λ)</p><p>Wire Diameter = 3 mm</p><p>Space = 4 mm</p><p>Pitch Angle: 7 Degrees</p><p>Standing alone, the NMHA incorporates 5 turns, allowing it to resonate at 101 MHz. Its height is 5 cm (0.01λ) and its diameter is 3.3 cm.</p><p>The NMMHA’s VSWR response has been measured by the MFJ 269C in the 87.5 - 110 MHz range and is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. According to the experiments performed, the advantage of this topology stems from eliminating the need for a complex matching network, as only a simple 50’Ω quarter-wavelength transformer is required. According to the graph shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, performance of the new NMMHA is superior to that of a NMHA discussed in the previous sections. The maximum VSWR in the 87 - 110 MHz range does not exceed 5:1, whereas the average VSWR value is only 2.3:1.</p><p>In order to further confirm the superior performance of the new NMMHA, real conditions measurements by the use of the Advantest U3751 spectrum analyzer were conducted with “on air” existing radio services and the results are reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>According to the data presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the NMMHA enables an average field strength intensity of 44.1 dBuV across Band II over 34.4 dBuV of a NMHA and 39.2 dBuV of the monopole (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In this respect, the NMMHA antenna presented in this section, despite having the smallest possible physical size, has been confirmed to exhibit the greatest efficiency when compared to all other antennae examined in this work.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The Normal Mode Multiloop Helical Antenna has been demonstrated in this research is capable of providing excellent specifications as a stand-alone antenna in VHF Band. The novelty of the modified NMHA stems from its small dimensions relative to other</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The VSWR response of the NMMHA</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1290079x9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Real conditions field strength measurements of the modified NMHA</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency MHz</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Field Strength dBuV</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>small antennas, such as the Herzian dipole or the short stub, without requiring complicate matching networks with higher efficiency. As a result, it would be highly important for future research pertaining to the NMHA to apply this topology across Band I or in lower frequency applications, i.e. the HF band where antennas must be constructed with large physical dimensions.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Constantinides, A.A. (2016) A Very Compact Normal Mode Multiloop Helical Antenna with Enhanced Bandwidth. Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 4, 159-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojapr.2016.44012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72240-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kraus, J. (1949) The Helical Antenna. Proceedings of the IRE, 37, 263-272.  
https://doi.org/10.1109/jrproc.1949.231279</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abd-Alhameed, R. and Excell, P. (1999) Analysis of a Normal-Mode Helical Antenna Including Non-Uniform Wire Surface Current Effects. IEE Proceedings of Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, 146, 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kraus, J. (1988) Antennas. McGraw-Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, J.X. and Yu, Y. (2014) An Electrically Small Normal-Mode Helical Antenna with Capacitive Coupling Feed. The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014), The Hague, 2915-2917.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noguchi, K., Mizusawa, M., Yamaguchi, T., Okumura, Y. and Betsudan, S. (2000) Increasing the Bandwidth of a Small Meander-Line Antenna Consisting of Two Strips. Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II: Electronics), 83, 35-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chatterjee, J. and Roy, M. (1968) Helical Log-Periodic Array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 16, 592-593. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1968.1139249</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noguchi, K., Betsudan, S., Katagi, T. and Mizusawa, M. (2003) A Compact Broad-Band Helical Antenna with Two-Wire Helix. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 51, 2176-2181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2003.816358</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shackelford, A., Lee, K.-F. and Luk, K. (2003) Design of Small-Size Wide-Bandwidth Microstrip-Patch Antennas. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 45, 75-83.  
https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2003.1189652</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mounich, G. and Littmann, B. (1998) Helical Antenna and Spiral Antenna with Fast Switch Selection of the Polarisation Sense. Electronics Letters, 26, 1918.  
https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19901235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Godara, L. (2002) Handbook of Antennas in Wireless Communications. CRC Press, Boca Raton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72240-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weiner, M. (2003) Monopoantennas. Marcel Dekker, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>