<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2016.717178</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-72197</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  An Effective Numerical Calculation Method for Multi-Time-Scale Mathematical Models in Systems Biology
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yohei</surname><given-names>Motomura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hiroyuki</surname><given-names>Hamada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Masahiro</surname><given-names>Okamoto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Synthetic Systems Biology Research Center, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Graduate School of Systems Life Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>17</issue><fpage>2241</fpage><lpage>2268</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>20,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The improvements of high-throughput experimental devices such as microarray and mass spectrometry have allowed an effective acquisition of biological comprehensive data which include genome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome (multi-layered omics data). In Systems Biology, we try to elucidate various dynamical characteristics of biological functions with applying the omics data to detailed mathematical model based on the central dogma. However, such mathematical models possess multi-time-scale properties which are often accompanied by time-scale differences seen among biological layers. The differences cause time stiff problem, and have a grave influence on numerical calculation stability. In the present conventional method, the time stiff problem remained because the calculation of all layers was implemented by adaptive time step sizes of the smallest time-scale layer to ensure stability and maintain calculation accuracy. In this paper, we designed and developed an effective numerical calculation method to improve the time stiff problem. This method consisted of ahead, backward, and cumulative algorithms. Both ahead and cumulative algorithms enhanced calculation efficiency of numerical calculations via adjustments of step sizes of each layer, and reduced the number of numerical calculations required for multi-time-scale models with the time stiff problem. Backward algorithm ensured calculation accuracy in the multi-time-scale models. In case studies which were focused on three layers system with 60 times difference in time-scale order in between layers, a proposed method had almost the same calculation accuracy compared with the conventional method in spite of a reduction of the total amount of the number of numerical calculations. Accordingly, the proposed method is useful in a numerical analysis of multi-time-scale models with time stiff problem.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Finite Difference Method</kwd><kwd> Stiff Equation</kwd><kwd> Multi-Time-Scale</kwd><kwd> Systems Biology</kwd><kwd> Mathematical Analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recent improvements in high-throughput biotechnologies such as microarray [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref1">1</xref>] and mass spectrometry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref2">2</xref>] have led to various omics data showing gene expression, protein synthesis, metabolome flux, and cell-cell interactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref5">5</xref>] . The ensuing accumulation of omics data has contributed significantly to mathematical models that indicate dynamic characteristics of biological systems, including interactions between genes, proteins, cells, and tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref7">7</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Systems biology approaches such as mathematical modeling of multiple layers have revealed complex relationships among biological phenomena of varying spatiotemporal scales, and have elucidated mechanisms with high order functions in biological systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref12">12</xref>] . In particular, multi-time-scale models have been applied to analyses of intracellular signal transduction systems such as cell cycle control, cell fate determination, and immune system mechanisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref16">16</xref>] . Moreover, mathematical analyses of varying (layer) gene (seconds), metabolism (minutes), and cell (hours) transition rates in biological systems define differences between biological systems and offer important discoveries of disease mechanisms. However, efficient techniques for numerical calculations remain elusive in practical applications of multi-time-scale mathematical models.</p><p>Multi-time-scale models comprise multiple layers that differ in rates of state change. During conventional numerical calculations of multi-time-scale models, time step sizes that are suitable for the smallest time-scale layer have been adopted for all layers to ensure stability and maintain calculation accuracy. Thus, dynamic behaviors of entire layers are numerically analyzed using excessively reduced time step sizes, leading to</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Overview of the multi-time-scale model; This model has three layers and has reactions across layers. The parameters <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> indicate concentrations; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>indicates the control variables from layer x to layer y; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>indicates the matrix of rate constants in layer n</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x2.png"/></fig><p>significant increases in computational demands (time stiff problem) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref19">19</xref>] . Numerous implicit methods such as the Radau method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref19">19</xref>] and Gear method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref20">20</xref>] have been proposed as candidate solutions to the time stiff problem. These methods generate numerical solutions based on calculation sensitivities and stabilities of components in 1 layer. Furthermore, the numerical solutions of these methods are calculated using non-linear simultaneous equations with n unknowns based on n components in the model. In calculating multi-time-scale model using the implicit method, larger time step sizes than those for the smallest time-scale layer can be applied to numerical calculations of all layers because the calculation stability of the implicit method is very high. However, because multi-time-scale models comprise large numbers of components, non-linear simultaneous equations that are calculated using implicit methods become very large. Specifically, although implicit methods suppress increases in computational loads due to excessive reductions in adaptive step sizes, significant increases in volumes of numerical calculations for non-linear simultaneous equations cause failure to eliminate the time stiff problem. Parallel computing with reduced computational cost has been applied to numerical calculations of multi-time-scale models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref23">23</xref>] . In contrast, contributions of parallel computing have been limited because analyses of dynamic behaviors of biological systems include numerous sequential calculations. These observations imply that the efficiency of numerical calculations in multi-time-scale models is highly dependent on reduced computational loads. Therefore, application of suitable step sizes to numerical calculations for each time scale layer will likely reduce computational loads significantly. Currently, few methods are available for determining suitable step sizes for numerical calculations of each layer in multi-time-scale models with interactions among layers, and solutions to this problem are essential for practical applications of multi-time-scale models to biological systems.</p><p>In this study, we developed a method for dynamically determining appropriate step sizes for the largest time-scale layer based on state changes of the smallest time-scale layer in numerical analysis of multi-time-scale models with interactions among layers. Subsequently, we proposed a numerical method for reducing computational loads of multi-time-scale models (proposed method) and verified the effectiveness of the proposed method using the follow steps:</p><p>1) Construction of multi-time-scale model (benchmark model) with interactions among layers that are universally observed in biological systems;</p><p>2) Numerical calculation of benchmark models using the conventional method (Control);</p><p>3) Numerical calculation of a benchmark model using the proposed method;</p><p>4) Comparison of computational loads for proposed and conventional methods;</p><p>5) Comparison of numerical solutions for proposed and conventional methods;</p><p>6) Discussion of the validity of the proposed method.</p><p>Using these procedures, we demonstrated the utility of the proposed method for improving computational efficiency without increasing computational costs of multi- time-scale models with interactions among layers. By reducing computational loads, the proposed method enhances the feasibility of mathematical analyses and accommodates greater scales of mathematical models, representing a significant contribution to systems biology methods.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>2.1. Benchmark Models with Multi-Time-Scales</title>
<p>To design and develop a method that is suitable for multi-time-scale models, we constructed 2 benchmark models (model A and model B) with the time stiff problem (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and evaluated the calculation performance of the proposed method. The time stiff problem occurred due to differences in time-scales of each layer by interactions among layers. Thus, these benchmark models satisfied the following conditions: 1) Models included interactions across layers; 2) Models had different time-scales of each layer. Models A and B comprised lower, middle, and upper layers with time scales of seconds, minutes, and hours, respectively. Model A contained inhibition effects such as suppressed expression of anabolic enzymes by metabolic products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref24">24</xref>] and negative control of gene expression by the lac repressor protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref25">25</xref>] , and these inhibition effects from upper to lower layers induced the time stiff problem with differences in time- scales of each layer caused by the largest time-scale layer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Model B contained activation effects such as the transcriptional control by RNA polymerase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref26">26</xref>] and the control of metabolic flux by enzymes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref27">27</xref>] , and these activation effects from lower to upper layers induced the time stiff problem with differences in time-scales of each layer caused by the smallest time-scale layer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). Furthermore, these effects of activation and inhibition were expressed using the Hill equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72197-ref28">28</xref>] , which empirically explains cooperative effects of oxygen binding to hemoglobin. Equations (1)-(9) show mass balance equations of model A as follows:</p>
<disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula105"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Case studies of multi-time-scale models; We verified the utility of the proposed method using two case studies. Both models have three layers with 60 time differences in time-scale order and were constructed using the Hill equation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x7.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula106"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula107"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula108"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula109"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula110"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula111"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula112"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72197-formula113"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7403394x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, Equations (1)-(3), (4)-(6), and (7)-(9) show magnitudes of change in lower, middle, and upper layers of model A, respectively. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows kinetic parameters of Equations (1)-(9), and Equations (10)-(18) show mass balance equations of model B as follows:</p></sec></sec></body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72197-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castel, D., Pitaval, A., Debily, M.A. and Gidrol, X. (2006) Cell Microarrays in Drug Discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 11, 13-14. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2006.05.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aebersold, R. and Mann, M. (2003) Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics. Nature, 13, 198-207. https:/doi.org/10.1038/nature01511</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bleicher, K.H., B&amp;ouml;hm, H.J., Müller, K. and Alanine, A.I. (2003) A Guide to Drug Discovery: Hit and Lead Generation: Beyond High-Throughput Screening. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2, 369-378. https:/doi.org/10.1038/nrd1086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macarron, R., Banks, M.N., Bojanic, D., Burns, D.J., Cirovic, D.A., Garyantes, T., Green, D.V., Hertzberg, R.P., Janzen, W.P., Paslay, J.W., Schopfer, U. and Sittampalam, G.S. (2011) Impact of High-Throughput Screening in Biomedical Research. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10, 188-195. https:/doi.org/10.1038/nrd3368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fischer, E., Zamboni, N. and Sauer, U. (2004) High-Throughput Metabolic Flux Analysis Based on Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Derived 13C Constraints. Analytical Biochemistry, 325, 308-316. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2003.10.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ge, H., Walhout, A.J. and Vidal, M. (2003) Integrating “Omic” Information: A Bridge Between Genomics and Systems Biology. Trends in Genetics, 19, 551-560. 
https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2003.08.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altaf-Ul-Amin, M., Afendi, F.M., Kiboi, S.K. and Kanaya, S. (2014) Systems Biology in the Context of Big Data and Networks. BioMed Research International, 2014, Article ID: 428570. https:/doi.org/10.1155/2014/428570</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hood, L. (2003) Leroy Hood Expounds the Principles, Practice and Future of Systems Biology. Drug Discovery Today, 8, 436-438. 
https:/doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02710-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitano, H. (2002) Systems Biology: A Brief Overview. Science, 295, 1662-1664. 
https:/doi.org/10.1126/science.1069492</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitano, H. (2002) Computational Systems Biology. Nature, 420, 206-210. 
https:/doi.org/10.1038/nature01254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, E.T. (2005) Systems Biology, Integrative Biology, Predictive Biology. Cell, 121, 505-506. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Papp, B., Notebaart, R.A. and Pál, C. (2011) Systems-Biology Approaches for Predicting Genomic Evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 591-602. 
https:/doi.org/10.1038/nrg3033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, Z., Petschnigg, J., Ketteler, R. and Stagljar, I. (2015) Application Guide for Omics Approaches to Cell Signaling. Nature Chemical Biology, 11, 387-397. 
https:/doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1809</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bajikar, S.S. and Janes, K.A. (2012) Multiscale Models of Cell Signaling. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 40, 2319-2327. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0560-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Helikar, T., Kochi, N., Kowal, B., Dimri, M., Naramura, M., Raja, S.M., Band, V., Band, H. and Rogers, J.A. (2013) A Comprehensive, Multi-Scale Dynamical Model of ErbB Receptor Signal Transduction in Human Mammary Epithelial Cells. PLoS ONE, 8, e61757.  
https:/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061757</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stolarska, M.A., Kim, Y. and Othmer, H.G. (2009) Multi-Scale Models of Cell and Tissue Dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 367, 3525-3553. 
https:/doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Curtiss, C.F. and Hirschfelder, J.O. (1952) Integration of Stiff Equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 38, 235-243.  
https:/doi.org/10.1073/pnas.38.3.235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sommeijer, B.P. (1993) Parallel-Iterated Runge-Kutta Methods for Stiff Ordinary Differential Equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 45, 151-168. 
https:/doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(93)90271-C</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hairer, E. and Wanner, G. (1999) Stiff Differential Equations Solved by Radau Methods. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 111, 93-111.  
https:/doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00134-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gear, C.W. (1971) Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. Prentice-Hall, Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gear, C.W. (1988) Parallel Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. International Symposium on Vector and Parallel Processors for Scientific Computation, 25, 1-20. 
https:/doi.org/10.1007/bf02575744</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellen, A., Vermiglio, R. and Zennaro, M. (1990) Parallel ODE-Solvers with Stepsize Control. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 31, 277-293. 
https:/doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(90)90170-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pope, B.J., Fitch, B.G., Pitman, M.C., Rice, J.J. and Reumann, M. (2011) Performance of Hybrid Programming Models for Multiscale Cardiac Simulations: Preparing for Petascale Computation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58, 2965-2969. 
https:/doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2161580</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herrero, A., Muro-Pastor, A.M. and Flores, E. (2001) Nitrogen Control in Cyanobacteria. Journal of Bacteriology, 183, 411-425. https:/doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.2.411-425.2001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewis, M., Chang, G., Horton, N.C., Kercher, M.A., Pace, H.C., Schumacher, M.A., Brennan, R.G. and Lu, P. (1996) Crystal Structure of the Lactose Operon Repressor and Its Complexes with DNA and Inducer. Science, 271, 1247-1254. 
https:/doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5253.1247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gruber, T.M. and Gross, C.A. (2003) Multiple Sigma Subunits and the Partitioning of Bacterial Transcription Space. Annual Review of Microbiology, 57, 441-466. 
https:/doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090913</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suarez, R.K., Staples, J.F., Lighton, J.R.B. and West, T.G. (1997) Relationships between Enzymatic Flux Capacities and Metabolic Flux Rates: Nonequilibrium Reactions in Muscle Glycolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7065-7069. https:/doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.13.7065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goutelle, S., Maurin, M., Rougier, F., Barbaut, X., Bourguignon, L., Ducher, M. and Maire, P. (2008) The Hill Equation: A Review of Its Capabilities in Pharmacological Modeling. Fundamental &amp; Clinical Pharmacology, 22, 633-648. 
https:/doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00633.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P. (2007) Numerical Recipes. 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fehlberg, E. (1970) Klassische Runge-Kutta-Formeln vierter und niedrigerer Ordnung mit Schrittweiten-Kontrolle und ihre Anwendung auf W&amp;auml;rmeleitungsprobleme. Computing, 6, 61-71. https:/doi.org/10.1007/BF02241732</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Komori, A., Maki, Y., Nakatsui, M., Ono, I. and Okamoto, M. (2012) Efficient Numerical Optimization Algorithm Based on New Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm, AREX + JGG, and Application to the Inverse Problem in Systems Biology. Applied Mathematics, 3, 1463-1470. https:/doi.org/10.4236/am.2012.330205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arakawa, A. and Jung, J.H. (2011) Multiscale Modeling of the Moist-Convective Atmosphere—A Review. Atmospheric Research, 102, 263-285. 
https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.08.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72197-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duarte, F., Amrein, B.A., Blaha-Nelson, D. and Kamerlin, S.C. (2015) Recent Advances in QM/MM Free Energy Calculations Using Reference Potentials. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1850, 954-965. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.07.008</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>