<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMPCERO</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2168-5436</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijmpcero.2016.54026</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJMPCERO-71814</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Treatment of Massive Low-Grade Chondrosarcoma of Nasal Septum with Helical Tomotherapy: A Case Report
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hamit</surname><given-names>Basaran</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Timur</surname><given-names>Koca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sibel</surname><given-names>Karaca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ozlem</surname><given-names>Eser K&amp;iota;l&amp;iota;nc</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fikriye</surname><given-names>Gul Karauc</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Okan</surname><given-names>&amp;Ouml;zdemir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ozan</surname><given-names>Kuduban</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arzu</surname><given-names>Tatar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sare</surname><given-names>&amp;#350;ipal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Pathology, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>269</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>23,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>4,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>7,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Chondrosarcomas are malignant bone tumors which develop as a cartilaginous differentiation of primary mesenchymal cells and the second most frequently seen malignant tumor of the bone after osteosarcoma. These malignancies are slowly growing non-epithelial tumors with unknown etiology and most frequently seen during the 4 decades of life. They are frequently localized on pelvis, ribs and long bones. Nasal septum CSs are very rarely seen malignancies. They originate from septal mucosa or cartilage and it is difficult to make a diagnosis unless they reach a certain size. A few cases of CSs with nasal septum have been reported in the literature. In cases of CSs, surgery is the gold standard treatment modality; however in surgically unresectable cases or close to margins, radiotherapy plays a significant role in primary and adjuvant treatment. Based on the position of the tumor in head and neck and extremely closeness of the tumor to vital organs as optic nerve, chiasm and brain, image guided-intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) becomes very effective and reliable modalities and may be a favorable treatment alternative.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Chondrosarcoma</kwd><kwd> Image Guided</kwd><kwd> Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Chondrosarcomas (CSs) are malignant bone tumors which develop as a cartilaginous differentiation of primary mesenchymal cells. It is the second most frequently seen malignant tumor of the bone after osteosarcoma and rarely (1% - 12%) observed in head and neck (HN) region. In this region, it has been reported frequently in larynx, maxilla and skull base and rarely seen in nasal cavity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Primary treatment of HN CSs is radical surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref2">2</xref>] . Neck dissection is not recommended because of low rates of regional lymph node involvement (5.6%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref1">1</xref>] . However, in surgically unresectable cases, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are main components of treatment. Some authors assert that since CSs are not a radiosensitive tumor, radiotherapy has no place in primary and adjuvant therapy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref3">3</xref>] ; however, some of them suggest that radiotherapy provides acceptable outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref5">5</xref>] . Besides, some authors think that different radiotherapy techniques such as Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) or Proton Beam Radiation Therapy may yield diverse treatment outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref7">7</xref>] . In this report, a patient with a diagnosis of inoperable low-grade CSs arising from nasal septum, which was treated using HT device, was presented.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Case Report</title><p>A 71-year-old female patient consulted to outpatient clinic of Ear-Nose and Throat in 2013 with complaints of difficult nasal breathing, nasal stuffiness for nearly 10 years, gradual worsening of vision of the right eye and diplopia for 6 months. Anterior rhinoscopic examination detected a mass completely filling the nasal cavity. MRI of the patient demonstrated a mass in the left nasal cavity, extending into anterior cranial fossa, basis cranii, right orbita and left ethmoidal sinus with hypointense intensity on T1-weighted and heterogenous intensity on T2 weighted contrast-enhanced images (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The mass contained irregular calcifications. Histopathological examination of the biopsy material excised from nasal cavity revealed tumoral mass formed by atypical chondrocytes demonstrating nuclear hyperchromasia and binucleationin the chondroid matrix, which was reported as low-grade CSs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Before initiation of</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> MR image of the mass with heterogenous contrast uptake which invaded left nasal cavity, anterior cranial fossa, skull base, right orbita and left ethmoidal sinuses</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2660225x2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Atypical chondrocytes in chondroid matrix which invaded nasal mucosa 2 (H&amp;E &#215; 200)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2660225x3.png"/></fig><p>external radiotherapy visual field examination performed by the clinic of Eye Diseases, disclosed decreased visual acuity of the right eye and diplopia. The patient was evaluated in our clinic, treatment using HT device was decided. Tumor volume, clinical target volume and critical organs were contoured. Extreme proximity of the tumor to vital organs such as optic nerve, optic chiasm and brain and its invasion into the right orbita and skull base made treatment planning process complicated. For better protection of critical organs; treatment plan was prepared using a Simultaneous Integrated Boost technique (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Treatment planning of the patient was created using HT planning system (Accuray Inc., Madison, USA). In this planning a field width of 2.5 cm, a pitch of 0.287 and a modulation factor of 2.0 were used during optimization and dose calculation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The patient was treated to 64 Gy in 32 fractions using HT device.</p><p>Control examination performed at 3 Month after radiotherapy demonstrated that visual acuity of the patient’s right eye and diplopia recovered almost complete. Partial regression in the dimensions of the lesion was observed on MRI obtained at 6 Month, while a marked regression was detected in the dimensions of the lesion on MRI obtained at 18 Month (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The patient is still followed up by us and at control examination in June 2015 the patient did not report any complaint.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion</title><p>Chondrosarcomas are locally aggressive tumors, which rarely metastasize, and symptoms may change according to the size and location of the tumor. In localized HN CSs nodal and distant metastasis is rare [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref8">8</xref>] . CSs originating from nasal septum may generally manifest nonspecific symptoms as nasal obstruction, epistaxis, nasal discharge, in advanced cases with invasion into skull base, it may lead to symptoms of diplopia, proptosis, facial pain, headache, cranial nerve deficits, loss of vision and otalgia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref10">10</xref>] . Our patient complained of nasal obstruction gradually increasing for nearly 10 years and decreased visual acuity of the right eye persisting for the last 6 months and diplopia. In cases with CSs arising from nasal septum, as it is seen in our patient, disease</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Helical tomotherapy planning dose distribution</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2660225x4.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Dosimetric parameters of planning target volume, PTV56 and OAR’s</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dmax (Gy)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dmax (Gy)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dmin (Gy)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Quantec values (Gy)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CI</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTV64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTV56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brainstem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max. 54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Optic chiasm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max. 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Right optic nerve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max. 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Left optic nerve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max. 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Right eye</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max. &lt; 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Left eye</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max. &lt; 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Right Lens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Left Lens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Right Cochlea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%95 &lt; 55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Left Cochlea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%95 &lt; 55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Right Parotis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Left parotis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mandibula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Image of the mass which completely responded to therapy as detected on MRI obtained at 6 and 18 months after helical tomotherapy.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2660225x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2660225x5.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>progresses with nonspecific symptoms so diagnosis can be made only after onset of marked eye symptoms following invasion of the skull base or clinical signs signifying involvement of cranial nerves.</p><p>Surgical resection was accepted as a standard treatment for the treatment of head and neck CSs. Type of surgery depends on the histological grade, spread and location of the tumor. The objective of surgery is to perform gross total resection so as to obtain a tumor-free surgical margin. However, in tumors involving skull base, achievement of tumor-free surgical margin could not be ensured in most of the cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Effectiveness of radiotherapy in these patients as a monotherapy has been reported and applicability of radiotherapy has been indicated if radical surgery is the only curative alternative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref8">8</xref>] . In conclusion radiotherapy can be used for postsurgical residues, palliation of unresectable tumors or patients not suitable for major surgery. Also our patient was considered as an inoperable case because of tumor invasion into the right orbita and skull base, so radiotherapy was applied.</p><p>Various arguments exist about CSs localized on HN region. Since this tumor slowly progresses and consists of cartilage and connective tissue, it has a low level of radiosensitivity and it is considered relatively radioresistant. We also know that these types of tumors have smaller α/β ratios and yield a quadratic and delayed response to radiotherapy.</p><p>In our case, although clinical improvement was detected at an early time from treatment, radiological response manifested itself on MRI obtained at 18 month with marked regression in the dimensions of the lesion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). As a result, radiotherapy is frequently used for cases not amenable to surgical excision or cases with surgical margin positivity. In a study by Sahgal et al. the researchers followed up 18 patients with CS treated with IG-IMRT method and reported 5-year overall survival and local control rates as 87.8% and 88.1%, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>IG-IMRT method using HT enables treatment of the patients. As another modality of External Beam Radiation Therapy, Proton Beam Radiation Therapy, which utilizes therapeutic effects of accelerated proton particles, is used successfully in the treatment of the tumors of paranasal sinus and skull base. In the future, Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) technique can enable the treatment of head, neck and skull base tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71814-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In our study, we performed in patients with diagnosis of low-grade CS of head and neck region who have not any chance of surgery because of its close vicinity to critical organs; we recommend application of IG-IMRT method using HT device.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Basaran, H., Koca, T., Karaca, S., Kılınc, O.E., Karauc, F.G., &#214;zdemir, O., Kuduban, O., Tatar, A. and Şipal, S. (2016) Treatment of Massive Low- Grade Chondrosarcoma of Nasal Septum with Helical Tomotherapy: A Case Report. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 5, 263-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2016.54026</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.71814-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magnano, M., Boffano, P., Machetta, G., Garibaldi, E., Delmastro, E. and Gabriele, P. (2015) Chondrosarcoma of the Nasal Septum. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 272, 765-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3419-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gadwal, S.R., Fanburg-Smith, J.C., Gannon, F.H. and Thompson, L.D. (2000) Primary Chondrosarcoma of the Head and Neck in Pediatric Patients: A Clinicopathologic Study of 14 Cases with a Review of the Literature. Cancer, 88, 2181-2188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000501)88:9&lt;2181::AID-CNCR26&gt;3.0.CO;2-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lichtenstein, L. and Jaffe, H.L. (1943) Chondrosarcoma of Bone. American Journal of Pathology, 19, 553-573.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harwood, A.R., Krajbich, J.I. and Fornasier, V.L. (1980) Radiotherapy for Chondrosarcoma of Bone. Cancer, 45, 2769-2777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19800601)45:11&lt;2769::AID-CNCR2820451111&gt;3.0.CO;2-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McNaney, D., Lindberg, R.D., Ayala, A.G., Barkley, H.T. and Hussey, D.H. (1982) Fifteen Year Radiotherapy Experience with Chondrosarcoma of Bone. International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics, 8, 187-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(82)90512-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahgal, A., Chan, M.W., Atenafu, E.G., Masson-Cote, L., Bahl, G., Yu, E., Millar, B.A., et al. (2015) Image-Guided, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IG-IMRT) for Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: Preliminary Outcomes. Neuro-Oncology, 17, 889-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holliday, E.B. and Steven, S.J. (2014) Proton Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Review of the Clinical Experience to Date. International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics, 89, 292-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Austin-Seymour, M., Munzenrider, J., Goiten, M., et al. (1989) Fractionated Proton Radiation Therapy of Chordoma and Low Grade Chondrosarcoma of the Base of the Skull. Journal of Neurosurgery, 70, 13-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murthy, V., Master, Z., Gupta, T., Ghosh-Laskar, S., Budrukkar, A., Phurailatpam, R., Agarwal, J., et al. (2010) Helical Tomotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Dosimetric Comparison with Linear Accelerator-Based Step-and-Shoot IMRT. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 6, 194-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.65245</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coca-Pelaz, A., Rodrigo, J.P., Triantafyllou, A., Hunt, J.L., Fernández-Miranda, J.C., Strojan, P., de Bree, R., et al. (2014) Chondrosarcomas of the Head and Neck. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 271, 2601-2609.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Austin-Seymour, M., Munzenrider, J., Goiten, M., et al. (1989) Fractionated Proton Radiation Therapy of Chordoma and Low Grade Chondrosarcoma of the Base of the Skull. Journal of Neurosurgery, 70, 13-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.70.1.0013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71814-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mavroidis, P., Ferreira, B.C., Shi, C., Lind, B.K. and Papanikolaou, N. (2007) Treatment Plan Comparison between Helical Tomotherapy and MLC-Based IMRT Using Radiobiological Measures. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 52, 3817-3836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/011</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>