<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Climate Change</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9495</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajcc.2016.54033</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC-71726</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Seasonal Variation of Carbon and Nitrogen Emissions from Turfgrass
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Said</surname><given-names>A. Hamido</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elizabeth</surname><given-names>A. Guertal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>C.</surname><given-names>Wesley Wood</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>West Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Milton, FL, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences Department, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Immokalee, FL, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>shamido@ufl.edu(SAH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>448</fpage><lpage>463</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>September</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>30,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>2,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The role of turfgrasses in C and N cycling in the southeastern U.S. has not been well documented. The objectives of this research were to determine the characterization of chemical quality, clipping decomposition rates, and C and N release from warm- and cool-season turfgrasses. The study was conducted for 46 weeks in 2012 in Auburn, AL. Four warm season turfgrasses were used included (bermudagrass [
  <em>Cynodon dactylon </em>(L.) Pers. &#215; C. 
  <em>transvaalensis </em>Burtt Davy], centipedegrass (
  <em>Eremochloa ophiuroides </em>(Munro) Hack), St. Augustinegrass (
  <em>Stenotaphrum secundatum</em> (Walter) Kuntze), zoysiagrass (
  <em>Zoysia japonica</em> Steud.), and one cool season turfgrass (tall fescue (
  <em>Festuca arundinacea</em> Schreb)). Litter was placed into nylon bags at an oven dry rate of 3.6 Mg?ha?1. Litter bags were retrieved after 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 46 weeks, and analyzed for total C and N. A double exponential decay model was used to describe mass, C, and N loss. Results indicated that tall fescue decomposition occurred rapidly compared to warm season turfgrasses. Litter mass loss measured after 46 weeks was determined to be 61.7%, 73.7%, 72.2%, 86.8%, and 45.4% in bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, tall fescue, and zoysiagrass respectively. Zoysiagrass litter had a higher lignin concentration, while tall fescue had the lowest lignin. Over 46 weeks’ release of C was in the order: zoysiagrass &gt; bermudagrass = centipedegrass = St. Augustinegrass &gt; tall fescue, and release of N was in the order zoysiagrass &gt; centipedegrass &gt; bermudagrass = St. Augustinegrass &gt; tall fescue. Our study concluded that, zosiagrass is a better choice for home lawns. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Double-Exponential Decay Model</kwd><kwd> Turfgrasses</kwd><kwd> Fiber Content</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Understanding litter decomposition process in a given ecosystem is vital due to its effect on greenhouse gas concentration and biogeochemical cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. During decomposition, significant amounts of greenhouse gases, including CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O, are released [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref1">1</xref>] . Plants may also play an important role in C and nutrient cycling through the quality and quantity of their residues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref4">4</xref>] . Also, the quality and type of litter material influence soil organic matter content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Organic matter with higher C:N or lignin:N ratios decomposes slower, a function of lower N mineralization rates and increased N immobilization in microbial biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref6">6</xref>] . Moreover, the ability of soil microorganisms to decompose and/or mineralize organic matter depends on the chemical structure of the C compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref7">7</xref>] . Complex C compounds such as lignin can retard litter decomposition. Thus, the composition of plant residues, in particular C, N, and lignin concentrations, determines the rate and extent of decomposition of such residues. The concentration of lignin alone or the lignin:N content can be used as an indicator of decomposition rates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Litter decomposition pattern of any material can be divided into two phases: an early and a later stage which are regulated by fractions different chemical of the material. The early phase is regulated by the labile fraction including sugars, starch, soluble and unprotected cellulose and hemicelluloses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref11">11</xref>] and the later phase is regulated by the recalcitrant fraction including lignin and cellulose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref12">12</xref>] . Thus, lignin and cellulose become dominant in the residue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref13">13</xref>] . In some cases, the rate of decomposition approaches zero. This second portion is slowly decomposed, contributing to the development of soil organic matter.</p><p>There is limited research which examines decomposition rate of C and N dynamics in the long-term, non-tilled conditions in which warm and cool season’s turfgrasses are grown. There is a need to evaluate C and N dynamics in warm and cool season’s turfgrasses in the southeast United States. The objectives of this research were to determine the characterization of chemical quality, clipping decomposition rates, and C and N release from warm- and cool-season turfgrasses. That will solidify our understanding of different turfgrasses dynamics under current environment. In addition, it will reduce the emission of greenhouse gases through altering current turfgrass management by lowering fertilizer application rates and timing. A recent study summarized net C sequestration in home lawn turfgrasses across the U.S. included some warm- season turfgrasses, a large-scale survey from 16 sites across the U.S. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref14">14</xref>] . However, there are no studies which examine decomposition as a function of specific warm- season turfgrass species, which have different growth patterns from cool-season turf- grasses. Thus, the objectives of this study were to assess mass loss and C and N decomposition rates from warm (bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and zoysiagrass) and cool (tall fescue) seasons turfgrass clippings and exploring the relationships between chemical leaf composition, particularly fiber content, and decomposition rates and C and N release under field conditions. The reason behind choosing these grasses is their extensive use in urban eco-systems in the southeastern U.S.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Site Description and Sampling</title><p>A field decomposition study was initiated in May 17, 2012 and conducted for 46 weeks (wk) at the Auburn University Turfgrass Research Unit (32.58˚N, 85.50˚W), Auburn, AL, USA, on a Marvyn loamy sand soil (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult). The mean annual air and soil temperatures were 17˚C and 19˚C, respectively and the mean annual precipitation was 1233 mm (2011-2014, AWIS, 2014). Experiments were installed in 5 existing areas of common southeaster turfgrasses (4 warm season and 1 cool season): bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pres. &#215; Cynodon transvaalensis Burtt. Davy cv “Tifway”], Centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack cv “common”), St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum Walter Kuntze cv “Floratam”), and zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.) cv “Meyer”, and cool season- tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) cv “Rebel Exeda” were the selected species and cultivars. All of the turfgrass stands had been established for at least 5 years, and none were older than 7 years. All plots areas were no more than 300 m from each other. Swards were managed as lawn grasses, with the following mowing heights for each: bermudagrass and zoysiagrass (5.0 cm), tall fescue and St. Augustinegrass (7.6 cm) and centipedegrass (6.4 cm). Plots were mown either with a walk behind homeowner-type reel mower (Tru-Cut Mowers, Inc., 141 East 157th Street, Gardena, CA 90248) (bermudagrass and zoysiagrass) or with a homeowner riding rotary mower (Husqvarna Professional Products, Inc. Charlotte, NC 28269) (all other grasses), respectively. All plots were mown three days a week with clippings returned. Supplemental irrigation was provided in the absence of rainfall so that irrigation + precipitation equaled 2.5 cm∙wk<sup>−1</sup>. An on-site weather station was used to determine daily precipitation.</p><p>A litter bag decomposition method, often used in forestry, was employed for this study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref16">16</xref>] . For litter collection, all turfgrasses were harvested (3 m wide &#215; 3 m long plot) at a height to remove no-more than 1/3 of uppermost green leaf tissue, for each respective mowing height. This ensured that scalping did not occur and that the majority of tissue was comprised of fresh leaf growth. All tissue was harvested using the mower that was used for plot maintenance, and clippings were collected in attached baskets. Four replicate plots of each turfgrass were harvested, and each was tracked through a litter bag as a replicate plot at each harvest time. Litter was transported immediately to the laboratory. Litter of each grass from each replicate was mixed separately, and weeds or other debris were removed. Litter was placed into nylon bags (ANKOM technology, Macedon, NY) measuring 10 &#215; 20 cm with 50 to 60 mm openings at a rate of 30 g oven dry∙bag<sup>−1</sup> (3.6 Mg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>). The bags (total of 180; four replicates for each species) were incubated in the field, placed directly into the thatch layer (the area had been trimmed free of verdure) on the same grass plots from where it was harvested. The bags were anchored with sod staples at the edge of each bag, ensuring that the bags would not move due to wind or predators. Spacing between individual bags was 30 &#215; 45 cm to prevent any interactions among bags. The total incubation period was 46 wk (from May 17, 2012 to April 4, 2013). Four bags (replicates) of each species were retrieved at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 46 wk. Fertilizer was withheld from experimental plots during the experiment.</p><p>Soil moisture and temperature were measured on a weekly basis using an auxiliary sensor (Onset Computer Corporation, 470 MacArthur Blvd., Bourne, MA 02532). The sensor was placed at a 5.0 cm depth in the soil, with soil moisture and temperature recorded at 5 minute intervals. Three sensors were placed in the bermudagrass plot area and results averaged for use for all grasses. Spot checks throughout the study period revealed that soil moisture and temperature was not substantially affected (over the entire study period) by grass species.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Carbon and Nitrogen Analyses</title><p>The four replicate bags from each grass species were retrieved from the field at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 46 wk. Retrieved bags were emptied into plastic containers and oven-dried at 55˚C for 72 h and weighed for dry-matter determination. Litter was ground to pass a 1 mm-sieve and analyzed for total C and N using LECO TruSpec CN analyzer (Leco Corp, St. Joseph, MI). All data were converted to an ash-free dry weight basis by ashing 1 g of sample in a muffle furnace at 450˚C for 16 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref17">17</xref>] . In addition, C:N ratios were calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Initial Fiber Analysis</title><p>Initial values of lignin concentration in leaf litter were assessed by the acid-detergent digestion technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref18">18</xref>] . The acid detergent fiber technique measures cellulose, lignin, and ash, and represents the insoluble components of cell walls. Acid detergent lignin (ADL) is an estimate of the lignin content. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) comprises the insoluble components of cell walls (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin). Acid detergent fiber (ADF) is a measure of cellulose and lignin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Decay Model</title><p>A double, four-parameter exponential decay model (Equation (1)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref20">20</xref>] , simulating decomposers and substrates (labile and the recalcitrant constants) dynamics in grasslands, was used to describe the decay pattern.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.71726-formula3"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where Y = remaining mass (normalized %),</p><p>A = the labile portion,</p><p>C = the recalcitrant portion,</p><p>b and d are the labile and the recalcitrant constants, respectively, and</p><p>x = time in weeks.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>Means, standard errors, and statistical variations of treatments were determined using mixed models procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref21">21</xref>] . Least squares estimates for nonlinear models were determined using four parameter double exponential decay models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref22">22</xref>] . Double exponential decay models were employed as the basis for comparison of mass, N, and C loss between dates among all grasses. SigmPlot 12.1, Non-Linear Regression, was used to identify correlations (r) among variables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Initial Fiber Analysis</title><p>The initial fiber composition of harvested clippings had significant variation among the five turfgrass species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). For example, St. Augustinegrass clippings were significantly higher in acid detergent fiber (cellulose + lignin) (ADF) and ash contents than bermudagrass, centipedegrass, tall fescue, and zoysiagrass. Zoysiagrass litter had significantly higher lignin concentration, 6% &#177; 0.3% (mean &#177; SE), while tall fescue had the lowest content, at 3% &#177; 0.3%. The initial harvest of bermudagrass clippings had significantly higher neutral detergent fiber (hemicellulose + cellulose + lignin) (NDF) than found in other grasses, measuring 85% &#177; 0.3%. In contrast, tall fescue had the lowest NDF, measured at 63% &#177; 1.1%. Fiber contents play an important role in accelerating and/or suppressing decomposition processes.</p><p>The litter exhibiting higher initial lignin content had slower decomposition rates. For example, decomposition of Quercus dealbata (6% lignin) litter had slower decomposition than Quercus fenestrata (4% lignin) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref23">23</xref>] . In other work, concentration of the lignin fraction increased as decomposition proceeded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref24">24</xref>] , and litter was enriched with lignin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref25">25</xref>] . In later stages of decomposition, recalcitrant substances become more dominant in the residue, and in some cases the rate of decomposition approaches zero.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Remaining Mass</title><p>In all cases, the decay models were significant (P &lt; 0.0001) with reasonably high adjusted R<sup>2</sup> values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). All data were expressed on a normalized basis (percent remaining) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> indicates that the litter mass loss measured after 46 weeks was estimated at 45.4%, 61.7%, 73.7%, 72.2%, and 86.8% in zoysiagrass, bermudagrass,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Initial turfgrasses clipping contents (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) and the carbon and nitrogen (%) released after 46 weeks of field incubatio</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Grasses</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Initial contents (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Released contents (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NDF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bermuda</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >849.60a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >347.61b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.00b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.0b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.3c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.6b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Centipede</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >731.66d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >356.37b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.43c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >421a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.2c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.3c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St. Augustine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800.85c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >424.65a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.80b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.1b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.8a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tall fescue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >629.34e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296.17c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.33c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.9a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.7a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zoysia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >824.54b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371.19d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.61a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.1d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5c</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means in the same column with the same letter are not significantly different at α ≤ 0.05; NDF = Natural Detergent Fiber contains hemicellulose + cellulose + lignin (approximately total cell wall), ADF = Acid Detergent Fiber comprise cellulose + lignin, and ADL = Acid Detergent Lignin.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mass loss from turfgrass clippings over time, Auburn University Turfgrass Research Unit, 2012-2013. Lines represent fitted curves for each grass describing decay pattern over time. Error bars represent standard error about the mean</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x3.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Double exponential decay equations regressed on time (weeks) for mass, C, and N-loss from turfgrass incubated in litter bags under field conditions. Double exponential decay equations are in the form of Y = Ae<sup>−bx</sup>+ Ce<sup>−dx</sup>, where Y = remaining mass (normalized %), A = the labile portion, C = the portion, b and d are the labile and the recalcitrant constants, respectively, and x = time in weeks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Turfgrass</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Equation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; F<sup>† </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Syx<sup>‡ </sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bermudagrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 56.22e<sup>−0.08x</sup> + 44.33e<sup>−0.003x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Centipedegrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 89.54e<sup>−0.05x</sup> + 13.75e<sup>−8.28E−19x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St. Augustinegrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 19.43e<sup>−0.09x</sup> + 80.02e<sup>−0.02x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tall Fescue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 91.25e<sup>−0.11x</sup> + 9.47e<sup>−8.12E−19x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zoysiagrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 16.87e<sup>−0.12x</sup> + 84.14e<sup>−0.01x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bermudagrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 47.61e<sup>−0.11x</sup> +52.13e<sup>−0.01x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Centipedegrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 87.82e<sup>−0.04x</sup> + 13.72e<sup>−4.93E−18x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St. Augustinegrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 87.67e<sup>−0.04x</sup> + 5.21e<sup>−9.92E−18x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tall Fescue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 89.91e<sup>−0.11x</sup> + 9.32e<sup>−1.08E−17x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zoysiagrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 11.17e<sup>−0.28x</sup> + 90.14e<sup>−0.01x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bermudagrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 30.15e<sup>−0.28x</sup> +69.82e<sup>−0.01x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Centipedegrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 8.64e<sup>−0.89x</sup> + 91.36e<sup>−0.01x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St. Augustinegrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 28.58e<sup>−0.56x</sup> + 72.31e<sup>−0.02x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tall Fescue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 72.26e<sup>−0.21x</sup> + 22.68e<sup>−0.01x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zoysiagrass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y = 20.49e<sup>−0.16x</sup> + 79.94e<sup>−3.62E−19x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.95</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>†</sup>Significance of fit. <sup>‡</sup>Standard error of the estimate.</p><p>centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and tall fescue, respectively. However, zoysiagrass had very slow decomposition, with only 25% loss from an initial equivalent of 360 g∙m<sup>−2</sup> to 270 g∙m<sup>−2</sup>. Similar results were observed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref26">26</xref>] . They found that, in 16 weeks’ decomposition study, combinations of litters of cool-season turfgrass clippings of a bluegrass-ryegrass-red fescue mixture decomposed rapidly during the first 4 months, with a value of ≈70% of total mass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref26">26</xref>] . The faster decomposition rate of tall fescue can be partially explained by the lower initial ADF content.</p><p>The labile decay constant of zoysiagrass residue value (0.12) was 2.6 times greater than that of centipede grass (0.05) but closer to that of tall fescue (0.10). The effects of grass species on decay of recalcitrant portions were more distinct. The recalcitrant decay constant of zoysiagrass (0.0096) was greater than that of centipedegrass (8.28 &#215; 10<sup>−19</sup>) or tall fescue (8.12 &#215; 10<sup>−19</sup>). Rapid decay of turfgrass tissues are typically related to warmer soil temperatures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref27">27</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref32">32</xref>] and adequate moisture contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref34">34</xref>] , which stimulate both soil microbial activity and arthropods involved in decomposition processes.</p><p>Labile portions of warm-season turfgrass litter increased from 16.9% to 89.5%, and recalcitrant portions decreased from 84.1% to 13.8% under zoysiagrass and centipedegrass, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In contrast, tall fescue (cool-season grass) had a labile portion of 91.2%, and a recalcitrant portion of 9.5%. Such contents could significantly influence decomposition processes by acceleration and/or suppression. Thus, increasing the labile fraction is associated with decreasing the recalcitrant portion and will increase the decomposition rate.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Carbon Release from Turfgrass Clippings</title><p>All C data were expressed on a normalized basis (percent remaining) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). In all cases, the regression models were significant (P &lt; 0.0001) with reasonably high adjusted</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Measured soil temperature and moisture contents at 5 cm soil depth during decomposition study at the Auburn University Turfgrass Research Unit, 2012-2013</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Carbon loss from turfgrass clippings, Auburn University Turfgrass Research Unit, 2012-2013. Lines represent fitted curves for each grass describing decay pattern over time. Error bars represent standard error about the mean</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x6.png"/></fig><p>R<sup>2</sup> values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). As with the mass models, the C rate constant values c and d were larger for zoysiagrass residue than for centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and tall fescue residues combined. Initial C concentrations of turfgrasses differed slightly, from 42.8% in zoysiagrass, compared to 40.6, 42.2, 41.7, and 39.1 under bermudagrass, centipedegrass, tall fescue, and St. Augustinegrass, respectively. After 16 weeks of field incubation, zoysiagrass had lost only 21.7% of C content, while tall fescue lost 84%. Carbon loss models were comparable to mass loss. This loss was attributed to mass lost through microbial respiration of C (as CO<sub>2</sub>) to the atmosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref35">35</xref>] . Tall fescue C decreased faster during warmer temperatures. The labile decay constant of tall fescue value (0.11) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) was greater than that of centipede and St. Augustine grasses combined. The recalcitrant decay constant of tall fescue (1.07 &#215; 10<sup>−17</sup>) was nearly two times greater than centipedegrass (4.93 &#215; 10<sup>−18</sup>) and more than 100 times lower than zoysiagrass (0.01). The labile C portion of centipedegrass, tall fescue, and St. Augustinegrass was greater than 87%, and the recalcitrant portion of all these grasses was lower than 14%. In comparison, zoysiagrass had approximately 11% labile and 90% recalcitrant fractions. This may be the reason behind resistance to decay.</p><p>The time to decompose the turfgrass clipping varied with species. At 24 weeks, tall fescue C had declined by 85.2%, while zoysiagrass decreased by 25.7%. These differences may be caused by the chemical fiber structure such as NDF in the clippings. After 46 weeks, there were significant differences in C among turfgrass clippings with exception of bermudagrass and centipedegrass.</p><p>Carbon concentrations were negatively correlated with sampling time in bermudagrass (r = 0.88**) and St. Augustinegrass (r = 0.72*), however, correlation was positive for centipedegrass (r = 0.85**), tall fescue (r = 0.91***), and zoysiagrass (r = 0.75*) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The increase or decrease of C over time could be related to microbial biomass decomposition causing C release from soil or immobilization by microbial population.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Nitrogen Release from Turfgrass Clippings</title><p>Nitrogen data fit to double exponential decay models on a normalized basis. Adjusted R<sup>2</sup> value for that model was high, with the exception of that calculated for zoysiagrass (0.69). This was likely due to the small amount of N and fast release of labile N for zoysiagrass. Initial N concentrations in turfgrasses were low, with a N concentration of 14.5 g∙N∙kg<sup>−1</sup> in centipedegrass, compared to 14.7 and 14.6 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup> in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass, respectively. Tall fescue had a higher N concentration (40 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), followed by bermudagrass (23 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>). After 24 weeks of field incubation, zoysiagrass lost 17.3% of N content, compared to 47.4%, 31.1%, 49.5%, and 83.6% loss by bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, and tall fescue, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>The labile decay constant of centipedegrass (0.88; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) was greater than that of ber- mudagrass, tall fescue, and zoysiagrass combined. The recalcitrant decay constant of cen- tipede (0.01) was not greater than that of tall fescue (0.01) and more than 100 times greater than zoysiagrass (3.62 &#215; 10<sup>−19</sup>). The higher the constant the faster the decomposition.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between C concentration (%) and time of sampling for turfgrass clippings, Auburn University Turfgrass Research Unit, 2012-2013. Lines represent fitted curves for C% content of each grass</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Nitrogen loss from turfgrass clippings, Auburn University Turfgrass Research Unit, 2012-2013. Lines represent fitted curves for each grass describing decay pattern over time. Error bars represent standard error about the mean</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Carbon: nitrogenratios &#177; S.E of turfgrasses at each sampling period</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Week</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bermuda grass</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Centipede grass</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tall fescue</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >St. Augustine grass</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zoysia grass</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.7 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.3 &#177; 0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2 &#177; 2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3 &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5 &#177; 0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.7 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.7 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6 &#177; 1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3 &#177; 5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3 &#177; 0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.1 &#177; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.1 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8 &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1 &#177; 1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6 &#177; 0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5 &#177; 0.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The labile portion of tall fescue was 72%, and the recalcitrant portion was 23% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). McCurdy et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref36">36</xref>] found similar results, with a labile fraction of 80% and a recalcitrant portion of 25% in white clover litter incubated under field conditions. In contrast, centipedegrass had a low labile fraction (9%) and a high recalcitrant fraction (91%), indicating slower decomposition rate.</p><p>After 46 weeks, statistical analysis shows significant differences in the remaining and released N concentration among turfgrasses. For example, zoysiagrass represented the lowest value of released N with a value of 31.5% of total N compared to 87.7% of released N from tall fescue (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Although the biomass of all grasses are decreasing over time, the N concentration is increasing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Nitrogen concentrations were significantly correlated with sampling time in bermudagrass (r = 0.86**), centipedegrass (r = 0.98**), tall fescue (r = 0.77*), St. Augustinegrass (r = 0.94**), and zoysiagrass (r = 0.96**) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). A linear relationship between percent remaining biomass and nutrient concentration has been noted in other plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref39">39</xref>] . Changes in mass indicate loss of organic C during respiration, while changes in N concentration indicate changes in microbial biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>Previous studies reported similar results under different ecosystems, included five exotic plant species such as Acacia auriculiformis, Cassia siamea, Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus hybrid and Grevillea pteridifolia growing on coal mine spoil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref40">40</xref>] , in pine needles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref41">41</xref>] , woodland ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref42">42</xref>] and a mixture of herbaceous plants in Mediterranean subtropical agro-ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref43">43</xref>] . This N increase could be related to lignin compounds. Fioretto et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref44">44</xref>] reported that most N concentration in litter is bonded with lignin compounds, and N release will take place when lignin decomposition happens. They also suggested that lignin structure covers cell wall proteins, which protect them from microbial degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref44">44</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Carbon/Nitrogen Ratio</title><p>The nature of warm-season turfgrass decomposition is different than that of cool-sea- son turfgrass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref45">45</xref>] . Warm-season turfgrass contains a relatively high concentration of C,</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between N concentration (%) and time of sampling for turfgrass clippings, Auburn University Turfgrass Research Unit, 2012-2013. Lines represent fitted curves for N% content of each grass over time</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2360444x9.png"/></fig><p>allowing for slower initial decay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref46">46</xref>] . Typically, initial C:N ratios were 18.6 &#177; 0.7, 28.7 &#177; 1.0, 10.3 &#177; 0.1, 22.4 &#177; 1.3 and 29.3 &#177; 0.7 for bermudagrass, centipedegrass, tall fescue, St. Augustinegrass, and zoysiagrass, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> illustrates C:N ratios of the turfgrass clippings. C:N ratios are typically used to describe a residue’s propensity to immobilize or mineralize soil inorganic N [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref47">47</xref>] . The critical C:N ratio for immobilization/mineralization is between 19 and 30 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref49">49</xref>] . Thus, the C:N ratio plays a major role on N dynamics in soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref51">51</xref>] .</p><p>During the first 4 weeks the C:N ratio increased for all turfgrass species but does not limit the activity of decomposer organisms (C:N ratio &lt; 30:1, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref26">26</xref>] . For example, the C:N ratios of centipedegrass and zoysiagrass had increases for the first 2 weeks indicating a faster decay. Thereafter the C:N ratio declined indicating stabilization of decay process. After 46 week the C:N ratio of tall fescue was 9.6, compared to 13.4, 14.3, 15.0, and 20.5 for St. Augustinegrass, bermudagrass, centipedegrass, and zoysiagrass, respectively. Throughout the study tall fescue had the lowest C:N ratio, averaging 10.9, indicating that clippings from this turfgrass would be a long-term N contributor. Other grasses had higher initial C:N ratios, and they could be responsible for soil N immobilization. For example, in the first 8 weeks average C:N ratios in centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass were 28.7, 22.2 and 29.0, respectively. Similar conclusions were drawn by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Lignin/Nitrogen Ratio</title><p>Warm season turfgrasses had higher lignin:N ratio contents than tall fescue. Initial lignin:N ratios were: 0.33, 0.27, 0.99, 0.40 and 0.08 for bermudagrass, centipedegrass, St. Augustinegrass, zoysiagrass, and tall fescue, respectively. Lignin:N ratios of warm season turfgrasses are comparable with that measured for sub-tropical forest ecosystem litter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref23">23</xref>] . The low lignin of tall fescue helps to explain the faster decomposition of tall fescue clippings compared to other turfgrasses. In addition to that, adequate soil moisture contents played a major role in decomposition process by increasing or decreasing the process. That may be related to its effect on soil microorganisms and arthropods. Similar conclusions were drawn by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref52">52</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Our research demonstrates important aspects of warm and cool season turfgrass decomposition, mainly that tall fescue is comprised mostly of a quickly decaying labile fraction. Labile and recalcitrant decomposable C and N are important for short- and long-term effects on available N concentration in soil. Modeling warm- and cool- season turfgrass decomposition may enable turfgrass researchers and professionals to more accurately choose the best grass for home owners. Our study concluded that, zoysiagrass may be a better choice for lower N fertilization requirements and higher C accumulation in soils followed by bermudagrass, centipedgrass, St. Augustinegrass, and tall fescue. In addition, our study clearly shows that the decomposition of different turfgrass clippings presents rapidly released N within the thatch layer of turfgrass. Thus, a portion of that N will be available to that turfgrass during growing season. Then, N fertilization should be reduced when clippings are returned to turfgrass lawns. Moreover, differences in clipping C released under our study can be assumed that a portion of remaining C in the thatch layer could be important factor in soil C sequestration under southeastern U.S. turfgrass species and reduce climate change effect on turfed lawns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71726-ref53">53</xref>] . However, further research is needed to determine the effect of returned clipping on the soil C and N balance of soil profile under different managements.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hamido, S.A., Guertal, E.A. and Wood, C.W. (2016) Seasonal Variation of Carbon and Nitrogen Emissions from Turfgrass. American Journal of Climate Change, 5, 448-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2016.54033</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.71726-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berg, B. and McClaugherty, C. (2008) Plant Litter: Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74923-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swift, M.J., Heal, O.W. and Anderson, J.M. (1979) Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Vol. 5, University of California Press, Berkeley, 266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aerts, R. and Chapin III, F.S. (2000) The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Reevaluation of Processes and Patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, 30, 1-67. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60016-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rovira, P. and Vallejo, V.R. (2007) Labile, Recalcitrant, and Inert Organic Matter in Mediterranean Forest Soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 202-213. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.07.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wardle, D.A., Bonner, K.I. and Barker, G.M. (2002) Linkage between Plant Litter Decomposition, Litter Quality, and Vegetation Responses to Herbivores. Functional Ecology, 16, 585-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00659.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, M.A. and Attiwill, P.M. (1986) Nutrient Cycling and Nitrogen Mineralization in Eucalyptus Forests of South-Eastern Australia. I. Nutrient Cycling and Nitrogen Turnover. Plant and Soil, 92, 319-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02372482</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krauss, T.E.C., Zasoski, R.J., Dahlgren, R.A., Horwath, W.R. and Preston, C.M. (2004) Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Forest Soil Amended with Purified Tannins from Different Plant Species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 309-321. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.10.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hobbie, S. (1996) Temperature and Plant Species Control over Litter Decomposition in Alaskan Tundra. Ecological Monographs, 66, 503-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2963492</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sterjiades, R. and Erikson, K.E. (1993) Biodegradation of Lignin. In: Scalbert, A., Ed., Polyphenolic Phenomena, INRA Editions, Paris, 115-126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitayama, K., Suzuki, S., Hori, M., Takyu, M., Aiba, S., Majalap-Lee, N. and Kikuzawa, K. (2004) On the Relationships between Leaf-Litter Lignin and Net Primary Productivity in Tropical Rain Forests. Oecologia, 140, 335-339.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1590-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aerts, R. (1997) Climate, Leaf Litter Chemistry and Leaf Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Triangular Relationship. Oikos, 79, 439-449.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546886</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vargas, D.N., Bertiller, M.B., Ares, J.O., Carrera, A.L. and Sain, C.L. (2006) Soil C and N Dynamics Induced by Leaf-Litter Decomposition of Shrubs and Perennial Grasses of the Patagonian Monte. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 2401-2410. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.03.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wieder, R.K. and Lang, G.E. (1982) A Critique of the Analytical Methods Used in Examining Decomposition Data Obtained from Litter Bags. Ecology, 63, 1636-1642. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Selhorst, A. and Lal, R. (2013) Net Carbon Sequestration Potential and Emissions in Home Lawn Turfgrasses of the United States. Environmental Management, 51, 198-208. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9967-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandey, S.K., Singh, H. and Singh, J.H. (2014) Effect of Environmental Conditions on Decomposition in Eight Woody Species of a Dry Tropical Forest. Plant Biosystems, 148, 410- 418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2013.772923</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripathi, G., Deora, R. and Singh, G. (2013) The Influence of Litter Quality and Micro-  Habitat on Litter Decomposition and Soil Properties in a Silvopasture System. Acta Oecologica, 50, 40-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2013.01.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cochran, V.L. (1991) Decomposition of Barley Straw in a Subarctic Soil in the Field. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 10, 227-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00337372</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D. and Crocker, D. (2011) Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stubbs, T.L., Kennedy, A.C., Reisenauer, P.E. and Burns, J.W. (2009) Chemical Composition of Residue from Cereal Crops and Cultivars in Dryland Ecosystems. Agronomy Journal, 101, 538-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0107x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hunt, H.W. (1977) A Simulation Model for Decomposition in Grasslands. Ecology, 58, 469-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1938998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS Institute (2007) SAS System for Windows Release 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Systat Software (2009) SigmaPlot 12.3. Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laishram, I.D. and Yadava, P.S. (1988) Lignin and Nitrogen in the Decomposition of Leaf Litter in a Subtropical Forest Ecosystem at Shiroi Hills in North-Eastern India. Plant and Soil, 106, 59-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02371195</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berg, B. (2000) Litter Decomposition and Organic Matter Turnover in Northern Forest Soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 133, 13-22.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00294-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devi, A.S. and Yadava, P.S. (2007) Wood and Leaf Litter Decomposition of Dipterocarpus tuberculatus Roxb in a Tropical Deciduous Forest of Manipur, Northeast India. Current Science, 93, 243-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kopp, K.L. and Guillard, K. (2004) Decomposition Rates and Nitrogen Release of Turf Grass Clippings. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, 26 September-1 October 2004.  
http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/poster/2/5/2/860_koppk.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dang, C.K., Schindler, M., Chauvet, E. and Gessner, M.O. (2009) Temperature Oscillation Coupled with Fungal Community Shifts Can Modulate Warming Effects on Litter Decomposition. Ecology, 90, 122-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-1974.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernandes, I., Uzun, B., Pascoal, C. and Cassio, F. (2009) Responses of Aquatic Fungal Communities on Leaf Litter to Temperature Change Events. International Review of Hydrobiology, 94, 410-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200811163</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferreira, V. and Chauvet, E. (2011) Synergistic Effects of Water Temperature and Dissolved Nutrients on Litter Decomposition and Associated Fungi. Global Change Biology, 17, 551- 564.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferreira, V. and Chauvet, E. (2011) Future Increase in Temperature More than Decrease in Litter Quality Can Affect Microbial Litter Decomposition in Streams. Oecologia, 167, 279- 291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1976-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geraldes, P., Pascoal, C. and Cassio, F. (2012) Effects of Increased Temperature and Aquatic Fungal Diversity on Litter Decomposition. Fungal Ecology, 5, 734-740.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2012.05.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamido, S.A., Wood, C.W. and Guertal, E.A. (2016) Carbon Dioxide Flux from Bermudagrass Turf as Affected by Nitrogen Rate. Agronomy Journal, 108, 1000-1006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fraser, L.H. and Hockin, A.D. (2013) Litter Decomposition Rates of Two Grass Species along a Semi-Arid Grassland-Forest Ecocline. Journal of Arid Environments, 88, 125-129.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.07.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamido, S.A., Wood, C.W. and Guertal, E.A. (2016) Nitrogen Fertilization of Bermudagrass Affects Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Golf Course Management, 5, 88-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wood, C.W. and Edwards, J.H. (1992) Agroecosystem Management Effects on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 39, 123-138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCurdy, J.D., McElroy, J.S., Guertal, E.A. and Wood, C.W. (2013) Dynamics of White Clover Decomposition in a Southeastern Bermudagrass Lawn. Agronomy Journal, 105, 1277-1282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aber, J.D. and Melillo, J.M. (1980) Litter Decomposition: Measuring Relative Contributions of Organic Matter and Nitrogen to Forest Soils. Canadian Journal of Botany, 58, 416-421.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blair, J.M. (1988) Nitrogen, Sulfur and Phosphorous Dynamics in Decomposing Deciduous Leaf Litter in the Southern Appalachians. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 20, 693-701.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90154-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gallardo, A. and Merino, J. (1992) Nitrogen Immobilization in Leaf Litter in Two Mediterranean Ecosystems of SW Spain. Biogeochemistry, 15, 213-228.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00002937</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dutta, R.K. and Agrawal, M. (2001) Litterfall, Litter Decomposition and Nutrient Release in Five Exotic Plant Species Planted on Coal Mine Spoils. Pedobiologia, 45, 298-312.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Enoki, T. and Hawaguchi, H. (2000) Initial Nitrogen and Topographic Moisture Effects on the Decomposition of Pine Needles. Ecological Research, 15, 425-434.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00363.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, L.B. and Sims, R.E.H. (1999) Litter Decomposition and Nutrient Release via Litter Decomposition in New Zealand Eucalypt Short Rotation Forests. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 75, 133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00069-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodriguez Pleguezueloa, C.R., Duran Zuazo, V.H., Muriel Fernandez, J.L., Martin Peinado, F.J. and Franco Tarifa, D. (2009) Litter Decomposition and Nitrogen Release in a Sloping Mediterranean Subtropical Agroecosystem on the Coast of Granada (SE, Spain): Effects of Floristic and Topographic Alteration on the Slope. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 134, 79-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fioretto, A., Nardo, C.D., Papa, S. and Fuggi, A. (2005) Lignin and Cellulose Degradation and Nitrogen Dynamics during Decomposition of Three Leaf Litter Species in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 1083-1091.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USDA-NRCS (2004) Comparing Warm-Season and Cool-Season Grasses: For Erosion Control, Water Quality, and Wildlife Habitat.  
http://teamhabitat.sjrcd.org/WSGMaryland.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fortes, C., Trivelin, P.C.O. and Vitti, A.C. (2012) Long-Term Decomposition of Sugarcane Harvest Residues in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy, 42, 189-198.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hadas, A., Kautsky, L., Goek, M. and Kara, E.E. (2004) Rates of Decomposition of Plant Residues and Available Nitrogen in Soil, Related to Residue Composition through Simulation of Carbon and Nitrogen Turnover. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 255-266.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.09.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lutz, H.J. and Chandler, R.F. (1946) Forest Soils. John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edmonds</surname><given-names> R.L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1984</year>)<article-title>Long Term Decomposition and Nutrient Dynamics in Pacific Silver Fir Needles in Western Washington</article-title><source> Canadian Journal of Forest Research</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 395</fpage>-<lpage>400</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Magid, J., Mueller, T., Jensen, L.S. and Nielsen, N.E. (1997) Modelling the Measurable: Interpretation of Field-Scale CO2 and N-Mineralization, Soil Microbial Biomass and Light Fractions as Indicators of Oilseed Rape, Maize and Barley Straw Decomposition. In: Cadisch, G. and Giller, K.E., Eds., Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition, CAB International, Wallingford, 349-362.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hadas, A., Doane, T.A., Kramer, A.W., van Kessel, C. and Horwath, W.R. (2002) Modelling the Turnover of 15N Labelled Fertilizer and Cover Crop in Soil and Its Recovery by Maize. European Journal of Soil Science, 53, 541-552.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00483.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tu, L.-H., Hu, H.-L., Hu, T.-X., Zhang, J., Li, X.-W., Liu, L., Xiao, Y.-L., Chen, G. and Li, R.-H. (2014) Litterfall, Litter Decomposition, and Nutrient Dynamics in Two Subtropical Bamboo Plantations of China. Pedosphere, 24, 84-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71726-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamido, S.A., Wood, C.W. and Guertal, E.A. (2016) Carbon Sequestration under Warm Season Turfgrasses in Home Lawns. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 4, 53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.49005</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>