<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2016.711129</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-71586</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessment of Organic Compounds as Vehicular Emission Tracers in the Aburr&#225; Valley Region of Colombia
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Enrique</surname><given-names>Posada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Miryam</surname><given-names>Gómez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Viviana</surname><given-names>Monsalve</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>INDISA, Group of Process, Energy and Environmental Studies, Medellín, Colombia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Politécnico Colombiano Jaime Isaza Cadavid, Group GHYGAM, Medellín, Colombia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Enrique.posada@indisa.com(EP)</email>;<email>Enrique.posada@indisa.com(MG)</email>;<email>Enrique.posada@indisa.com(VM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>10</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1561</fpage><lpage>1570</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>August</day>	<month>16,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>24,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  
    The Aburr&#225; Valley region in Colombia, with Medell&#237;n as its main city, is an urban centre with about three million people. An investigation was carried out to deter-mine a set of baseline concentrations for VOC compounds associated with diesel fuel and gasoline, as vehicular emission tracers in the region. The VOC measurement campaigns, based on TENAX tube sampling and analysis according to TO-17 EPA method, were done in areas of low and high vehicular flow as well as on-board measurements covering major Medell&#237;n road networks during 24 hours. The results showed that there was a relation between VOCs concentrations and vehicular activi-ty. The diesel fuel sulfur content was also found as an important factor on VOC hy-drocarbon formation. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>VOCs</kwd><kwd> Vehicular Pollution Tracers</kwd><kwd> Vehicular Emissions</kwd><kwd> Urban Pollution</kwd><kwd> Rural Pollution</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>VOCs tend to be polluting considering both their inhalation and contact effects and as a source of secondary pollutants. For the present study, they were classified into two (2) groups: poly-nuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and aliphatic hydrocarbons (AH). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the list of VOCs studied and some basic characteristics.</p><p>The studied VOCs behave differently, following the two main types (alkanes [AH], and PAH) and this has to do with their molecular weight, as shown in the behavior of their vapor pressure and boiling point, properties that have to do with their presence in the atmosphere (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> VOCs studied and their vapour pressures as related to molecular weight</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-6703108x2.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> VOCs studied and their boiling points as related to molecular weight</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-6703108x3.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> VOCs studie</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Molecular weight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Vapor pressure at 25˚C, mm Hg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Boiling temperature at atm. pressure, ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Formula</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Nonane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C9H20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Decane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C10H22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Undecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.412</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C11H24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Dodecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C12H26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tridecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >232.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C13H28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tetradecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C14H30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Pentadecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >268.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C15H32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0850</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C10H8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C11H10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C11H10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenanthrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >332.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C14H10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-Methylphenanthrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000501</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >354.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C15H12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-Methylanthracene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000727</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >353.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C15H12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A review [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref2">2</xref>] of the health impact and occupational limits of the studied VOCs is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>In general, VOCs play an important role in environmental problems by their accumulation and persistence in the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref3">3</xref>] . Some VOCs, especially those of high molecular weight, resist oxidation processes and become persistent, being adsorbed on particles and transported over long distances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref4">4</xref>] , powering the global greenhouse effect.</p><p>So far no studies of these compounds have been done locally, so it is deemed important to carry out an exploratory work, in parallel with the fact that sulphur content of diesel fuel is undergoing changes at the time, from 2000 to 50 ppm and it is desired to correlate those changes with the said VOCs concentrations.</p><p>Alkanes tend to be emitted by vehicles, as they are components of fuels. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows typical contents of studied VOCs in low sulfur diesel and gasoline [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref5">5</xref>] . The other studied PAHs come from oil and coal tars and incomplete combustion, including wood combustion; Phenanthrene is also associated with cigarette and marihuana smoke and charcoal broil.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Occupational data for some of the VOCs studied. studie</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Residence half time in air, hr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Health impact</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Occupational limits</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Nonane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritation eyes, skin, nose, throat; headache, drowsiness, dizziness, confusion, nausea, tremor, discordination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV: 200 ppm (1050 mg/m<sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Decane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritation eyes, skin. Little impact</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV Not established</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Undecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No clear indication of risks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV Not established</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Dodecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritation eyes, skin. Little impact</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TEEL-0: Concentration below which people will experience no adverse health effects is 0.015 ppm (105 μg/m<sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tridecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritating to eyes and skin. Inhalation causes irritation of the lungs and respiratory system.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV Not established</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tetradecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritation eyes, skin. Inhalation causes irritation of the lungs and respiratory system</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV Not established</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Pentadecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No clear indication of risks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV Not established</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritating to skin and eyes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TWA 10 ppm (50 mg/m<sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritation. Toxic by all routes (i.e., ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV = 0.5 ppm (2.9 mg/m<sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irritating to skin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TLV = 0.5 ppm (2.9 mg/m<sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenanthrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 - 1570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A known irritant, photosensitizing skin to light. Potential occupational carcinogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TWA = 0.028 ppm (0.2 mg/m<sup>3</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Typical contents of studied VOC in low sulfur diesel and gasolin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% in typical diesel low S fuel</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% in gasoline</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Nonane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Decane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Undecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Dodecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tridecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tetradecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Pentadecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total studied AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The apparatus set up for the sampling is described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>The sampling method applied was EPA TO-17 using 90 mm length, 5 mm diameter stainless steel TENAX adsorption tubes filled with appropriate sorbent materials, prepared and supplied by the DRI (Desert Research Institute at Reno, Nevada, USA). The chemical analysis of the studied VOCs was also done at the DRI, using the Agilent Thermal Desorption-Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (TD-GC/MS) system.</p><p>The environmental samples were taken in a measurement campaign conducted in three sites, two of them with heavy traffic, the other one with low or inexistent traffic, from July to August 2011, with sampling periods of 24 hours. Each zone was evaluated during a week.</p><p>Additional samples were taken in the discharge of a diesel motor working under standardized laboratory conditions with diesel fuel of variable sulfur content. Run cycles followed standard ECE-M2 at 2420 rpm. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows a scheme for the run cycle.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methodology and Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Urban and Rural Sites</title><p>The VOC measurement campaign was conducted in three sites, two of them with heavy traffic (Poblado zone and Botanical Garden Park), the other one with low or inexistent traffic (Arv&#237; Park), from July to August 2010, with sampling periods of 24 hours. Each zone was evaluated during a week. Another sample was taken sampling during 24 hours continuously within a vehicle moving through designed zones in the city (On Board test). In the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, the sampling sites are located in the Aburr&#225; Valley map. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the concentrations in the urban and rural zones, and in the on-board 24 hour samples. It is clear that rural areas have lower VOCs concentrations than urban ones.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> compares the VOC concentrations found for the zones. It was found that the higher concentrations of the studied tracers correspond to pentadecane and naph-</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Description apparatus for VOC measurement (left) and apparatus located in the sampling zone (right)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-6703108x4.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Concentrations in urban and rural zones, and in the on-board 24-hour samples studied</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Poblado 05/08/10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Poblado 07/08/10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Poblado 10/08/10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Botanic Garden 20/08/10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arvi Park 31/08/10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >On-Board 02/09/10</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >urban</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Nonane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.870</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.736</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.769</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.896</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.919</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Decane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.693</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.986</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Undecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.668</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.473</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.467</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.728</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Dodecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.389</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.685</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.564</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tridecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.274</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.516</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.730</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tetradecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.588</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Pentadecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.986</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.379</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.839</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.836</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.269</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.637</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.741</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.322</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.576</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenanthrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.279</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-Metylphenanthrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.426</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-Methylanthracene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.523</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total studied VOC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.334</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.248</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.369</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.657</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total studied AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.666</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.851</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.922</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.894</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total estudied PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.398</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.763</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Run cycle scheme</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-6703108x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Sampling sites (Google map image 2016)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-6703108x6.png"/></fig><p>thalene. The on-board sample shows higher VOC’s concentrations than the other sampling sites. Probably because the on board test environment was in continuous contact with mobile sources. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows comparative result for all the zones in terms of total VOCs.</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Comparative results for VOC concentrations in all studied zones</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-6703108x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Total VOC concentrations for the studied zones</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-6703108x8.png"/></fig><p>It is clear in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> that the concentrations of VOCs in urban areas are clearly greater than the ones in rural areas. Urban total VOCs were about 25 times greater than the rural area. All concentrations, as expected, are clearly much lower than the reported occupational limits for the substances shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. A Review of VOC Concentrations in Urban and Rural Areas around the World</title><p>Following results reported elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71586-ref9">9</xref>] , <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> was prepared to compare values reported around the world with the ones found in the present study, in order to have a comparative measure of the magnitude of the problem in the Medell&#237;n region.</p><p>This analysis shows, in general, local values lower than the typical ones reported around the world. The typical values shown were chosen by the authors after elimination, at their own criteria, of extreme high values in the reported data.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> VOC concentrations (range and typical) around the world and in this study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Concentrations in urban areas (μg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Concentrations in rural areas (μg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range around the world</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Typical around the world</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average of this study</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range around the world</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Typical around the world</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average of this study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Nonane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 - 467</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 - 58.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.060</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Decane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16 - 1100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 - 161.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Undecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15- 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018 - 0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Dodecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 -160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 - 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tridecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18-2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01-0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tetradecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 - 36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 - 0.116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Pentadecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 - 158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 -0.149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.057</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 - 77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.139</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 - 5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-Methylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 - 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenanthrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 - 129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 -0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.456</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Diesel Engine Exhaust Concentrations</title><p>At the time of the study, S content of diesel fuel used in the region was undergoing changes, from 2000 ppm to 50 ppm and it was desired to correlate those changes with VOCs concentrations in the exhaust gases coming from a diesel motor working under standardized laboratory conditions.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> shows the results, which show a clear effect of the sulfur content of the fuel on the emissions of the studied VOCs.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p> The region atmosphere shows presence of VOCs.</p><p> The concentrations in urban areas are clearly greater than the ones in rural area. In the average urban total VOCs are 27 times larger.</p><p> The values found in rural and urban areas tend to be smaller than the typical values reported, around the world, in the literature. Total VOCs show values around 15% of the reported typical values for urban areas and about 5% for rural areas.</p><p> The VOC concentrations are related to vehicle emissions, especially to diesel fuel vehicle emissions.</p><p> An initial baseline has been established which should be useful for future work and public policy in relationship to vehicle related pollution control.</p><p> Reducing S content on diesel fuel has been a beneficial step in this direction.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> VOC concentrations in diesel fuel motor exhaust and sulfur content in diesel fuel</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fuel with sulfur at 50 ppm, &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fuel with sulfur at 500 ppm, &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fuel with sulfur at 2100 ppm, &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Nonane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Decane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >528</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Undecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >501</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Dodecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >649</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tridecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >586</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Tetradecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-Pentadecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >356</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Naphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-Metylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-Metylnaphthalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >317</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenanthrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total studied VOC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1832</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3869</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total studied AH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1650</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3230</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total estudied PAH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >505</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >639</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by POLIT&#201;CNICO COLOMBIANO JAIME ISAZA CADAVID and ECOPETROL. We acknowledge the DRI Institute for the analytical and sampling assistance and the University of Antioquia, GIMEL group, for the work done in the laboratory motor testing.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Posada, E., G&#243;mez, M. and Monsalve, V. (2016) Assessment of Organic Compounds as Vehicular Emission Tracers in the Aburr&#225; Valley Region of Colombia. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7, 1561-1570. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2016.711129</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.71586-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(1995) Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Data Base for the VOCs. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wiederkehr, P., et al. (1998) Urban Air Pollution. European Aspects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 403-418.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, H., So, K.L., Simpson, I.J., Barletta, B., Meinardi, S. and Blake, D.R. (2007) C1-C8 Volatile Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere of Hong Kong: Overview of Atmospheric Processing and Source Apportionment. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 1456-1472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chin, J.-Y. and Batterman, S.A. (2012) VOC Composition of Current Motor Vehicle Fuels and Vapors, and Collinearity Analyses for Receptor Modeling. Chemosphere, 86, 951-958.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sánchez, J.M. and Alcántara IX, A. Compuestos orgánicos volátiles en el medio ambiente, en Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Farmacia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barletta, B., Meinardi S., Sherwood, F., Chan, C.-Y., Wang, X.M., Zou, S.C., Chan, L.Y. and Blake, D.R. (2005) Volatile Organic Compounds in 43 Chinese Cities. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 5979-5990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derwent, R.G., Davies, T.J., Delaney, M., Dollard, G.J., Field, R.A., Dumitrean, P., Nason, P.D., Jones, B.M.R. and Pepler, S.A. (2000) Analysis and Interpretation of the Continuous Hourly Monitoring Data for 26 C2-C8 Hydrocarbons at 12 United Kingdom Sites during 1996. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 297-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00203-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71586-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pacheco, J., Franco, J., Behrentz, E., Belalcazar, L. and Clappier, A. (2009) VOCs Concentrations in the Ambient Air of Bogota City: Source Identification and Apportionment. Grupo de Estudios en Sostenibilidad Urbana y Regional, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia. Escuela Politécnica Federal de Lausanne (EPFL). Jeune Chercheur Boursier, KFPE, Suiza.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>