<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">YM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Yangtze Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2475-7330</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ym.2017.11002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">YM-71571</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Dual Roles of CD38 in Autophagy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xianwang</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiaxing</surname><given-names>Song</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zijun</surname><given-names>Wu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Buqun</surname><given-names>Fan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiameng</surname><given-names>Mode</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratory of Neuronal Network and Brain Diseases Modulation, School of Medicine, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>The First Affiliated Hospital &amp;amp; The First School of Clinical Medicine, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>xwshine@yangtzeu.edu.cn(XW)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>01</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>19</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>27,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>March</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  CD38 is a versatile, ubiquitously expressed protein that was identified as a multifunctional enzyme. Recently, cumulating evidence has suggested that CD38 is involved in autophagy, which is an evolutionarily conserved lysosomal degradation and recycling system. Acting as a enzyme, CD38 utilizes nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) to synthesize nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP), which acts as a key messenger for Ca
  <sup>2+</sup>-mobilizing in lysosome by targeting two-pore channels (TPCs) or transient receptor potential mucolipins (TRPMLs). Multiple studies have indicated that CD38 is involved in autophagy by modulating intracellular Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> signaling. However, the control of autophagy by CD38 signaling is the subject of two contrary views. The autophagosomes trafficking and fusion with lysosomes to form autolysosomes are crucial steps in autophagy. On the one hand, the avail-able evidence indicates that lysosome trafficking and fusion to autophagosomes is positively modulated by CD38. On the other hand, overexpression of TPC2, which is positively modulated by CD38, was shown to promote the accumulation of autophagosomes, thus suppress autophagy. This review will reveal the interesting contrary dual roles of CD38 in autophagy, and critical insight into the molecular mechanisms of CD38 in autophagy regulation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>CD38</kwd><kwd> Autophagy</kwd><kwd> Calcium</kwd><kwd> NAADP</kwd><kwd> Lysosome</kwd><kwd> Autophagosome</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. CD38 and Calcium Signaling</title><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. The Function and Basic Structure of CD38</title><p>CD38 is a type II membrane protein, originally identified as a cell surface differentiation marker in B lymphocytes, and later found to be expressed ubiquitously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref2">2</xref>] . In fact, CD38 is a versatile molecule with big ambitions. Although early studies revealed that CD38 serves as a differentiation antigen on cell surface, multiple studies have indicated a more diverse role for CD38 in many physiological and pathological processes, including Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling, autophagy, tumorigenesis, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), richter syndrome, acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and type II diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>As a transmembrane protein, human CD38 is a 46-kDa glycoprotein, which consists of three conserved regions: a short N-terminal topological domain (NTD, residues 1 - 21), a single transmembrane helix domain (TMD, residues 22 - 44) and a long C-terminal catalytic domain (CCD, residues 45 - 300) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Some key amino residues in C-terminal catalytic region are responsible for nucleosidase activity of CD38. Mutations of the three residues W125F, W189G and E226G, affect the catalytic activity and subsequent calcium signaling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref13">13</xref>] . CD38 catalyzed synthesis of cADPR, which increased intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> and resulted in microglial activation and activation-induced cell death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref14">14</xref>] . Moreover, CD38 contains some variations in single nucleotide that occur at specific sites in the genome, called single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which have been used in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) as a key marker in gene mapping related to human diseases. The SNP position of CD38 at residues R140 (corresponding to rs1800561) is closely related to ASD or type II diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref11">11</xref>] . Another SNP site rs6449182 at P184 is associated with richter syndrome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref11">11</xref>] . Besides, the three disulfide bonds of CD38 are sponsored by cysteine residues between C160 and C173, C254 and C275, C278 and C296 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref13">13</xref>] . The N- linked glycosylation modifications are usually occurring at four asparagine residues N100, N164, N209 and N219 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref15">15</xref>] . These disulfide bonds and glycosylation modifications might play important roles in the topology of CD38 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. CD38, a Key Messager for Intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup>-Mobilizing</title><p>Generally speaking, intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> oscillation arise either from its release</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The structure of human CD38. Human CD38 contains three conserved domains: a short N-terminal topological domain (NTD, residues 1 - 21), a single transmembrane helix domain (TMD, residues 22 - 44) and a long C-terminal catalytic domain (CCD, residues 45 - 300). Three residues W125, W189 and E226 are responsible for nucleosidase activity of CD38. Two SNP positions occur at residues R140 and P184. The three disulfide bonds of CD38 are sponsored by cysteine residues between C160 and C173, C254 and C275, C278 and C296. The N-linked glycosylation modifications are occur at four asparagine residues N100, N164, N209 and N219</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2940005x2.png"/></fig><p>from intracellular stores, such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER), endolysosome and mitochondria, or by modulating Ca<sup>2+</sup> channels at the plasma membrane, including voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs), Na<sup>+</sup>/Ca<sup>2+</sup> exchanger (NCX), plasma membrane calcium-transporting ATPases (PMCAs), cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels (CNGCs), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazo- lepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NM- DAR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>As we known, Streb et al. discovered the Ca<sup>2+</sup>-mobilizing activity of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP<sub>3</sub>), which targets IP<sub>3</sub> receptor (IP<sub>3</sub>R) in ER and stimulates ER-Ca<sup>2+</sup> release [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref17">17</xref>] . In addition to IP<sub>3</sub>, cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) and nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) are also identified as important intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> messengers, which elicit intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> flux from either ER or endolysosome. As a multifunctional enzyme, CD38 is responsible for the synthesis of cADPR and NAADP from NAD and NADP, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref3">3</xref>] . Besides, CD38 also plays a critical role in the degradation of NAADP by hydrolyzing NAADP to ADP-ribose 2’-phosphate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref18">18</xref>] . It is known that both IP<sub>3</sub> and cADPR trigger Ca<sup>2+</sup> release from the ER via the IP<sub>3</sub>R and ryanodine receptors (RYR), respectively. However, the other potent Ca<sup>2+</sup>-mobilizing messenger NAADP drive Ca<sup>2+</sup> flux from the endolysosomal pools by targeting the two-pore channels (TPCs) or transient receptor potential mucolipin-1 (TRPML1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref20">20</xref>] . Intriguingly, the CD38/NAADP-mediated lysosome Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling have been shown to participate in the physiological regulation of cell functions or activities, such as autophagy and apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref21">21</xref>] . Cumulating evidence has suggested that autophagosomes trafficking and fusion with lysosomes is a NAADP/ Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling dependent process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref22">22</xref>] . Thus, modulating the production of NAADP in cells by CD38 may be play important roles in lysosomal functions, especially autolysosomes formation and autophagic contents elimination.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Autophagy: A Brief Introduction</title><p>Autophagy, also called self-eating, a natural and evolutionarily conserved lysosomal degradation and renovation process to hydrolyze unused or dysfunctional cellular components, such as long-lived or misfold proteins and useless organelles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref23">23</xref>] . Actually, the basal autophagy activity is essential for cell homeostasis, involving cell growth, survival, development and death. The levels of autophagy must be precisely regulated, as indicated by the fact that dysfunctional autophagy has been related to wide ranges of human diseases, such as cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref25">25</xref>] , neurodegenerative diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref26">26</xref>] , myopathies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref27">27</xref>] , gastrointestinal disorders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref28">28</xref>] , heart and liver diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref29">29</xref>] . The most interesting is the study about autophagy and cancer. There are dual roles of autophagy in tumorigenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref30">30</xref>] . On the one hand, autophagy was thought to be a tumor-suppression mechanism. In normal cells and tissues, autophagy usually acts as a tumor suppressor by autophagy-mediated recycling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref31">31</xref>] . By preventing the toxic accumulation of damaged protein and organelles, particularly mitochondria, autophagy resists oxidative stress and oncogenic signaling, which inhibits malignancy. One the other hand, autophagy also plays tumor-promoting roles. In most contexts, cancers can induce autophagy to survive microenvironmental stress and to increase growth and aggressiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>In recent years, autophagy has attracted great interest in the biological and medical sciences. Actually, there are at least three types or pathways of autophagy, including macroautophagy, microautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref32">32</xref>] . One common hallmark of autophagy is mediated by the multiple autophagy-related (Atg) genes and their associated enzymes. The main and most common pathway, macroautophagy, usually called autophagy, is an intracellular recycling system, used primarily to mediate bulk degradation of superfluous or damaged cytosolic materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref23">23</xref>] . This autophagy processes include several steps: 1) induction and formation of a double membrane vesicle known as an autophagosome, 2) autophagosomes trafficking and fusion with lysosomes to form autolysosomes, and 3) degradation and recycling of autophagic contents via acidic lysosomal hydrolases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The overview of autophagy. The Atg9 complex, ULK complex and Beclin-1-Vps34 complex are important for induction of autophagosome. Besides, autophagosome formation also requires both LC3-II and Atg12-Atg5- Atg16L conjugation systems. The autophagosomes trafficking and fusion with lysosomes to form autolysosomes is controlled by a lot of factors, including Rab7, Rab5A, Lamp1/Lamp2, dynein ATPase, Vacuolin-1, TRPMLs and TPCs. In the breakdown step, autophagic materials or contents are hydrolyzed by lysosomal enzymes in autolysosome</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2940005x3.png"/></fig><p>As an evolutionarily ancient response to cellular stress, cell autophagy can be evoked by a wide variety of stresses, including nutrition starvation, bacterial and viral infection, drought, salt, senescence and oxidative stress. Indeed, the autophagy process is executed by more than 30 Atg factors and associated proteins in response to stimuli. It is known that autophagy is initiated at the phagophore assembly site (PAS) in yeast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref33">33</xref>] . Yamamoto et al. demonstrated that the Atg13- mediated supramolecular assembly is responsible for autophagy initiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref34">34</xref>] . Yao et al. indicated that the Atg1 complex bond to Atg9-vesicles, thus facilitating the induction of autophagy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref33">33</xref>] . In fact, autophagosome formation is the most complicated event, which is driven by series larger molecular complexes. As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, autophagy induction is controlled by the Unc-51-Like kinase (ULK, also called Atg1) complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref36">36</xref>] , Atg9 complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref33">33</xref>] and autophagosome formation requires Beclin-1-Vps34 complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref37">37</xref>] . Besides, the LC3-II (as ortholog of Atg8) and Atg12-Atg5-Atg16L conjugation systems are also essential for the autophagosomal formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref35">35</xref>] . In addition to Atg proteins, many other factors and proteins, including Ras-related protein Rab- 7/5A (Rab7/5A), Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1/2 (Lamp1/ Lamp2), ATPase, Vacuolin-1, TPCs and TRPMLs have been implicated in regulating autophagosomal lysosomal fusion process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>In the end, the completion of autophagy depends on lysosomal activity, deficiencies in autophagosomal lysosomal fusion and degradation can lead to the accumulation of autophagosomes, ultimately impairing cells or resulting in cell death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref41">41</xref>] . Accordingly, the mechanisms of the control for lysosome function are emerging as an important theme for autophagy-lysosomal cargos digestion.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. CD38 and Autophagy</title><p>Because lysosomes play an important role in autophagy, the regulation mechanism of lysosomal functions is considered as the key element for autophagy. The fact that autophagy involves degradation by the autolysosome, which is formed by conjugation of an autophagasome and a lysosome, suggests that CD38/ NAADP signaling might be implicated in this process (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). It is known that CD38-mediated regulation of lysosome function contributes to autophagic flux or autophagy maturation. However, as listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, there is paradox about the effect of CD38 on autophagy. The summary of these evidences are described as below.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. The Positive Regulation of CD38 in Autophagy</title><p>Most lines of evidence support the positive regulation of CD38 in autophagy. Cumulating evidence has suggested that lysosome trafficking and fusion to autophagosomes is positively modulated by NAADP via CD38 enzymatic activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref42">42</xref>] . Deficiency of CD38 resulted in a defective autophagic event in coronary arterial media of mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref43">43</xref>] . Inhibition of CD38 by CD38 shRNA or nicotinamide leads to accumulation of p62 and autophagosomes, suppressing lysosome fusion to autophagosomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref44">44</xref>] . Moreover, in indolocarbazole induced</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> The potential mechanisms of CD38 in autophagy regulation. CD38 acts as a NAD<sup>+</sup> dependent enzyme, which catalyzes the synthesis of cADPR and NAADP from NAD<sup>+</sup> and NADP<sup>+</sup>, respectively. Then, the cytosolic cADPR and NAADP target to RYR on ER and TPC or TRP-ML1 on lysosome, modulating ER-Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling and lysosome-Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling, respectively. On the one hand, increasing of intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> leads to activation of dynein ATPase, ERK, PKCθ or cAMKKβ/AMPK signaling pathways, thus facilitates the formation of autolysosome. On the other hand, Ca<sup>2+</sup> releases promote ATP synthesis in mitochondria (Mito) and AMPK inhibition, lead to suppression of mTOR and autophagy. Moreover, releasing of Ca<sup>2+</sup> from lysosome by TPC2 or TRPML-1 has been suggested to inhibit Rab7 and alkalinizing lysosomal pH, thereby results in suppression of autophagosomal-lysosomal fusion, accumulation of autophagosomes in cytosol and subsequently autophagy impairment</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2940005x4.png"/></fig><p>cell autophagy, CD38 expression and the LC3-II/LC3-I ratio are significantly elevated in response to ZW2-1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref45">45</xref>] . Subsequent studies showed that enzymatic activity of CD38 to produce NAADP plays an essential role in the following breakdown of the autophagic contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref19">19</xref>] . When nucleosidase activity of CD38 is disrupted or NAADP production is decreased, the formation of autolysosomes and degradation of autophagic vesicles also become impaired, which promotes cell dedifferentiation, proliferation and growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref19">19</xref>] . Besides, NAADP is also reported to increase acidic vesicular organelle formation and the expression levels of LC3II and Beclin-1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref46">46</xref>] . It is known that ROS promote autophagy maturation by regulating dynein-mediated autophagosomes trafficking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref47">47</xref>] . High glucose induced ROS production results in the activation of dynein ATPase, which further triggers autophagosomes trafficking and fusion with lysosomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref47">47</xref>] . Moreover, antagonism of NAADP mediated Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling with NED-19 and pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2’,4’-disulfonic acid (PPADS) eliminated ROS- evoked lysosomes Ca<sup>2+</sup> flux and dynein activation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref47">47</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. The Negative Regulation of CD38 in Autophagy</title><p>In contrast, CD38 is also involved in inhibition of autophagy. Some lines of evi-</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The roles of CD38 in autophagy. Abbreviation: Embryonic stem cells, ESC; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL; Immature hematopoietic progenitors, IHP; Coronary arterial myocytes, CAM; Mouse glomerular podocytes, MGP; Vascular endothelial cells, VEC; Vascular smooth muscle cells, VSMC</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cell types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Potential Mechanism</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effect to autophagy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References (first author, year)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAADP-Lysosome-Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zhang, 2010</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Autophagic flux</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xu, 2011</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Astrocytes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAADP/TPCs, LC3-II, Beclin-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pereria, 2011</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VEC, VSMC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAADP/TRPML1/TPCs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Li, 2013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MGP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LC3-II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xiong, 2013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Autophagic flux</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zhang, 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dynein ATPase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xu, 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B cells</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blimp1, Beclin-1/p62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yuan, 2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >293T cells</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAADP/TRPML1, LRRK2/CaMKK/AMPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gomez-Suaga, 2012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CLL cells</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beclin-1, Bcl-2, Autophagic flux</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bologna, 2013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hela cells, ESC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAADP/TPC2/Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling, lysosomal pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lu, 2013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ESC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAADP/TPC2/Ca<sup>2+</sup> Signaling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lu, 2013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IHP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Autophagic flux</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gomez-Puerto, 2016</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>dence indicate that CD38 is a autophagy suppressor. Deficiency of CD150 is associated with increased expression levels of CD38 and inhibited phosphorylation of p38, JNK1/2, Bcl-2 and autophagic flux [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref7">7</xref>] . Moreover, CD38 deficiency immature hematopoietic progenitors show a higher autophagic flux as shown by analysis of LC3-II and p62 levels, as well as flow cytometry-based autophagic vesicle quantification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref48">48</xref>] . NAADP as a potent Ca<sup>2+</sup> mobilizing messenger, which targets the TRPMLs or TPCs and triggers Ca<sup>2+</sup> release from the endolysosomal stores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref19">19</xref>] . As we known, the members of the TRPML constitute a family of evolutionarily conserved cation channels that play crucial roles in endolysosomal vesicles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref49">49</xref>] . TRPMLs localize to endolysosomes and facilitate Ca<sup>2+</sup>-de- pendent fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes resulting in lysosomal degradation of autophagic material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref20">20</xref>] . It is known that TPCs have recently emerging as the targets for NAADP, which are crucial for appropriate basal and induced autophagic flux in cardiomyocytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref50">50</xref>] . For instance, overexpression of TPC2 in vitro suppressed autophagosomal-lysosomal fusion, thereby resulting in the decreasing levels of LC3-II and p62 and the accumulation of autophagosomes, suggesting that inhibition of autophagy progression by TPC2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref41">41</xref>] . Thus, NAADP and its receptors (TRPMLs or TPCs) in lysosome may play crucial roles in lysosomal functions and subsequent autophagy events.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. The Potential Mechansim of CD38 in Autophagy</title><p>It is well established that intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> is one important regulators of autophagy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref21">21</xref>] . Firstly, intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup>-mobilization stimulates calmodulin (CaM), ERK and PKCθ signaling, thereby mediating autophagy progression. Of note, overexpression of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) stimulates an increase in autophagy initiation through Ca<sup>2+</sup>-dependent activation of a CaMKKβ/adeno- sine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref52">52</xref>] . Moreover, Ca<sup>2+</sup> also inhibits autophagy by promoting mitochondria ATP, which inhibits CaMKKβ/AMPK pathway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref21">21</xref>] . Thus, CD38 triggers intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> flux from ER and lysosome can also result in opposite outcomes of autophagy directly, depending on multiple stimuli and the different cellular state. As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, CD38 catalyzes the synthesis of cADPR and NAADP from NAD and NADP, respectively. These two messengers target to RYR and TPC or TRP-ML1, modulating ER-Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling and lysosome-Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling, respectively. On the one hand, increasing of intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> leading to activation of dynein ATPase, ERK, PKCθ or cAMKKβ/AMPK signaling pathways, thus facilitates the formation of autolysosome. On the other hand, Ca<sup>2+</sup> releases promoting ATP synthesis in mitochondria and AMPK inhibition, leading to suppression of mTOR and autophagy. In addition, releasing of Ca<sup>2+</sup> from lysosome by TPC2 or TRPML-1 have been suggested to inhibit Rab7 and alkalinizing lysosomal pH, thereby resulting suppression of autophagosomal-lysosomal fusion, accumulation of autophagosomes in cytosol and subsequently autophagy impairment.</p><p>Indeed, CD38 is involved in various stimuli induced autophagy. FasL has been shown to significantly increase NAADP production and intracellular Ca<sup>2+ </sup>flux in CD38 overexpressed mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref53">53</xref>] . In experimental autoimmune myocarditis mouse model, IL-17 promote B cell autophagy by controlling B-lymphocyte- induced maturation protein-1 (Blimp-1) expression and CD38<sup>(+)</sup> CD138<sup>(+)</sup> B cell percentages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref54">54</xref>] . Not surprisingly, CD38 is possibly implicated in autophagy by variety of mechanisms. Lu et al. demonstrated that Vacuolin-1 suppress general endosomal-lysosomal degradation by decreasing V-ATPase activity to enhance lysosomal pH in HeLa cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref38">38</xref>] . Of interest, in addition to CD38, other NAD<sup>+ </sup>dependent enzymes, such as silent information regulator 2-related enzymes (Sirtuins) and the polymerase (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), act as the key mediators of macro autophagocytotic cell death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref56">56</xref>] . There is a potential crosstalk among CD38, Sirtuins and PARPs in autophagic cell death and survival pathways [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71571-ref56">56</xref>] .</p><p>Taken together, there are several potential mechanisms of CD38 in autophagy, including 1) mobilizing intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> release by producing cADPR and NAADP, 2) affecting the functions of lysosome by regulating the activity of lysosome related proteins, e.g. TPC2, Vacuolin-1, and 3) crosstalking with other NAD<sup>+</sup>-dependent enzymes, e.g. Sirtuins, PARPs. Thus, continuing to study the mechanism of CD38 and its related proteins in autophagy is very interesting works.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, CD38 acts as an important autophagy modulator by predominantly regulating CD38/NAADP/Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling mechanism. CD38 may be playing a dual effect on autophagy process in response to multiple different stimuli. A complete understanding the molecular mechanism of CD38 in autophagy remains in a fascinating challenge for future investigation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research is supported by Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 2016CFB180), Hubei Province Health and Family Planning Scientific Research Project (grant No. WJ2016Y07), Jingzhou Science and Technology Development Planning Project (grant no. JZKJ15063), the Open Fund of Laboratory of Neuronal Network and Brain Diseases Modulation in Yangtze University, the Development Fund from School of Medicine in Yangtze University, the Yangtze Fund for Youth Teams of Science and Technology Innovation and the College Students Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Program inYangtze University (grant No. 2016133). We thank Professor Hongwu Xin and his lab members for their valuable comments and advice.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wang, X.W., Song J.X., Wu, Z.J., Fan, B.Q. and Mode X.M. (2017) Dual Roles of CD38 in Autophagy. Yangtze Medicine, 1, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.4236/ym.2017.11002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.71571-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jackson, D.G. and Bell, J.I. (1990) Isolation of a cDNA Encoding the Human CD38 (T10) Molecule, a Cell Surface Glycoprotein with an Unusual Discontinuous Pattern of Expression during Lymphocyte Differentiation. Journal of Immunology, 144, 2811-2815.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y., Graeff, R. and Lee, H.C. (2012) Roles of cADPR and NAADP in Pancreatic Cells. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 44, 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gms044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galione, A. (2010) NAADP Receptors. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 3, a004036.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y.J., Zhu, W.J., Wang, X.W., Zhang, L.H. and Lee, H.C. (2015) Determinants of the Membrane Orientation of a Calcium Signaling Enzyme CD38. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1853, 2095-2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.10.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, T., et al. (2016) Immuno-Targeting the Multifunctional CD38 Using Nanobody. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 27055. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sasaki, M., Kakuda, Y., Miyakoshi, M., Sato, Y. and Nakanuma, Y. (2014) Infiltration of Inflammatory Cells Expressing Mitochondrial Proteins around Bile Ducts and in Biliary Epithelial Layer May Be Involved in the Pathogenesis in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 67, 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201917</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bologna, C., et al. (2016) SLAMF1 Regulation of Chemotaxis and Autophagy Determines CLL Patient Response. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 126, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI83013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chiarini, F., et al. (2012) A Combination of Temsirolimus, an Allosteric mTOR Inhibitor, with Clofarabine as a New Therapeutic Option for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Oncotarget, 3, 1615-1628. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.762</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Munesue, T., et al. (2010) Two Genetic Variants of CD38 in Subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Controls. Neuroscience Research, 67, 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2010.03.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aydin, S., et al. (2008) CD38 Gene Polymorphism and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Role in Transformation to Richter Syndrome? Blood, 111, 5646-5653. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-01-129726</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riebold, M., et al. (2011) All-Trans Retinoic Acid Upregulates Reduced CD38 Transcription in Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines from Autism Spectrum Disorder. Molecular Medicine, 17, 799-806.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antonelli, A., et al. (2002) Autoimmunity to CD38 and GAD in Type I and Type II Diabetes: CD38 and HLA Genotypes and Clinical Phenotypes. Diabetologia, 45, 1298-1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-002-0886-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Q., et al. (2005) Crystal Structure of Human CD38 Extracellular Domain. Structure, 13, 1331-1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2005.05.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayo, L., et al. (2008) Dual Role of CD38 in Microglial Activation and Activation-Induced Cell Death. The Journal of Immunology, 181, 92-103. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.92</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, R., et al. (2009) Glycoproteomics Analysis of Human Liver Tissue by Combination of Multiple Enzyme Digestion and Hydrazide Chemistry. Journal of Proteome Research, 8, 651-661. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr8008012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glazner, G.W., Chan, S.L., Lu, C. and Mattson, M.P. (2000) Caspase-Mediated Degradation of AMPA Receptor Subunits: A Mechanism for Preventing Excitotoxic Necrosis and Ensuring Apoptosis. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 20, 3641-3649.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Streb, H., Irvine, R.F., Berridge, M.J. and Schulz, I. (1983) Release of Ca2+ from a Nonmitochondrial Intracellular Store in Pancreatic Acinar Cells by Inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate. Nature, 306, 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1038/306067a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schmid, F., Bruhn, S., Weber, K., Mittrucker, H.W. and Guse, A.H. (2011) CD38: A NAADP Degrading Enzyme. FEBS Letters, 585, 3544-3548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2011.10.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, P.L., Zhang, Y., Abais, J.M., Ritter, J.K. and Zhang, F. (2013) Cyclic ADP-Ribose and NAADP in Vascular Regulation and Diseases. Messenger, 2, 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1166/msr.2013.1022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venkatachalam, K., Wong, C.O. and Zhu, M.X. (2015) The Role of TRPMLs in Endolysosomal Trafficking and Function. Cell Calcium, 58, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2014.10.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Decuypere, J.P., Bultynck, G. and Parys, J.B. (2011) A Dual Role for Ca(2+) in Autophagy Regulation. Cell Calcium, 50, 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2011.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., et al. (2014) Defective Autophagosome Trafficking Contributes to Impaired Autophagic Flux in Coronary Arterial Myocytes Lacking CD38 Gene. Cardiovascular Research, 102, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvu011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobayashi, S. (2015) Choose Delicately and Reuse Adequately: The Newly Revealed Process of Autophagy. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 38, 1098-1103. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b15-00096</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brisson, L., et al. (2016) Lactate Dehydrogenase B Controls Lysosome Activity and Autophagy in Cancer. Cancer Cell, 30, 418-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.08.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mowers, E.E., Sharifi, M.N. and Macleod, K.F. (2016) Autophagy in Cancer Metastasis. Oncogene, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2016.333</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caccamo, A., Ferreira, E., Branca, C. and Oddo, S. (2016) p62 Improves AD-Like Pathology by Increasing Autophagy. Molecular Psychiatry, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lai, C.H., et al. (2016) Multi-Strain Probiotics Inhibit Cardiac Myopathies and Autophagy to Prevent Heart Injury in High-Fat Diet-Fed Rats. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 13, 277-285. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.14769</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernandez, C., et al. (2016) Aspirin-Induced Gastrointestinal Damage Is Associated with an Inhibition of Epithelial Cell Autophagy. Journal of Gastroenterology, 51, 691-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-015-1137-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hofius, D., Munch, D., Bressendorff, S., Mundy, J. and Petersen, M. (2011) Role of Autophagy in Disease Resistance and Hypersensitive Response-Associated Cell Death. Cell Death and Differentiation, 18, 1257-1262. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2011.43</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amaravadi, R., Kimmelman, A.C. and White, E. (2016) Recent Insights into the Function of Autophagy in Cancer. Genes and Development, 30, 1913-1930. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.287524.116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">White, E. (2015) The Role for Autophagy in Cancer. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 125, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI73941</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sato, M., et al. (2016) Fluorescent-Based Evaluation of Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy and Microautophagy Activities in Cultured Cells. Genes to Cells: Devoted to Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms, 21, 861-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12390</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, Y., Perna, M.G., Hofmann, B., Beier, V. and Wollert, T. (2016) The Atg1-Kinase Complex Tethers Atg9-Vesicles to Initiate Autophagy. Nature Communications, 7, Article No. 10338. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10338</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamamoto, H., et al. (2016) The Intrinsically Disordered Protein Atg13 Mediates Supramolecular Assembly of Autophagy Initiation Complexes. Developmental Cell, 38, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karanasios, E., et al. (2016) Autophagy Initiation by ULK Complex Assembly on ER Tubulovesicular Regions Marked by ATG9 Vesicles. Nature Communications, 7, 12420. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12420</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jung, C.H., et al. (2009) ULK-Atg13-FIP200 Complexes Mediate mTOR Signaling to the Autophagy Machinery. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 20, 1992-2003. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-12-1249</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Funderburk, S.F., Wang, Q.J. and Yue, Z. (2010) The Beclin 1-VPS34 Complex—At the Crossroads of Autophagy and Beyond. Trends in Cell Biology, 20, 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, Y., et al. (2014) Vacuolin-1 Potently and Reversibly Inhibits Autophagosome-Lysosome Fusion by Activating RAB5A. Autophagy, 10, 1895-1905. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.32200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, Y., et al. (2013) Two Pore Channel 2 (TPC2) Inhibits Autophagosomal-Lyso-somal Fusion by Alkalinizing Lysosomal pH. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288, 24247-24263. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.484253</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, Y., et al. (2016) Golgi-Associated LC3 Lipidation Requires V-ATPase in Noncanonical Autophagy. Cell Death and Disease, 7, e2330. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.236</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, Y., Hao, B., Graeff, R. and Yue, J. (2013) NAADP/TPC2/Ca(2+) Signaling Inhibits Autophagy. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 6, e27595. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.27595</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parrington, J. and Tunn, R. (2014) Ca(2+) Signals, NAADP and Two-Pore Channels: Role in Cellular Differentiation. Acta Physiologica, 211, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12298</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, M., et al. (2011) Lysosomal Regulation of Autophagy Efflux via CD38-Mediated Signaling in Mouse Coronary Arterial Myocytes. Hypertension, 58, E178-E178.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiong, J., et al. (2013) Autophagy Maturation Associated with CD38-Mediated Regulation of Lysosome Function in Mouse Glomerular Podocytes. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 17, 1598-1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W., Lv, M., Zhao, X. and Zhang, J. (2015) Developing a Novel Indolocarbazole as Histone Deacetylases Inhibitor against Leukemia Cell Lines. Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, 2015, Article ID: 675053. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/675053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, G.J., et al. (2011) Nicotinic Acid Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NAADP) Regulates Autophagy in Cultured Astrocytes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286, 27875-27881. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C110.216580</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, M., et al. (2014) Enhancement of Dynein-Mediated Autophagosome Trafficking and Autophagy Maturation by ROS in Mouse Coronary Arterial Myocytes. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 18, 2165-2175. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12326</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomez-Puerto, M.C., et al. (2016) Autophagy Proteins ATG5 and ATG7 Are Essential for the Maintenance of Human CD34(+) Hematopoietic Stem-Progenitor Cells. Stem Cells, 34, 1651-1663. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeevi, D.A., Lev, S., Frumkin, A., Minke, B. and Bach, G. (2010) Heteromultimeric TRPML Channel Assemblies Play a Crucial Role in the Regulation of Cell Viability Models and Starvation-Induced Autophagy. Journal of Cell Science, 123, 3112-3124. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.067330</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia-Rua, V., et al. (2016) Endolysosomal Two-Pore Channels Regulate Autophagy in Cardiomyocytes. The Journal of Physiology, 594, 3061-3077. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP271332</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomez-Suaga, P., et al. (2012) Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 Regulates Autophagy through a Calcium-Dependent Pathway Involving NAADP. Human Molecular Genetics, 21, 511-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr481</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomez-Suaga, P. and Hilfiker, S. (2012) LRRK2 as a Modulator of Lysosomal Calcium Homeostasis with Downstream Effects on Autophagy. Autophagy, 8, 692-693. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.19305</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, F., Xia, M. and Li, P.L. (2010) Lysosome-Dependent Ca(2+) Release Response to Fas Activation in Coronary Arterial Myocytes through NAADP: Evidence from CD38 Gene Knockouts. American Journal of Physiology: Cell Physiology, 298, C1209-C1216. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00533.2009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuan, J., et al. (2014) Autophagy Contributes to IL-17-Induced Plasma Cell Differentiation in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis. International Immunopharmacology, 18, 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2013.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, Y.N.H., Chen, H., Li, J., Hong, Y., Wang, B., Wang, C., Zhang, J., Cao, W., Zhang, M., Xu, Y., Ding, X., Yin, S.K., Qu, X. and Ying, W. (2015) NAD&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;/NADH Metabolism and NAD&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;-Dependent Enzymes in Cell Death and Ischemic Brain Injury: Current Advances and Therapeutic Implications. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 22, 1239-1247. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867322666150209154420</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71571-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassa, P.O. (2009) The Molecular “Jekyll and Hyde” Duality of PARP1 in Cell Death and Cell Survival. Frontiers in Bioscience, 14, U72-U73. https://doi.org/10.2741/3232</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>