<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2016.711123</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-71201</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Investigation on &lt;sup&gt;226&lt;/sup&gt;Ra, &lt;sup&gt;238&lt;/sup&gt;Th, 40&lt;sup&gt;40&lt;/sup&gt;K and &lt;sup&gt;137&lt;/sup&gt;Cs Concentrations in Common Polishing Materials Consumed by Inhabitants in Saudi Arabia
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wedad</surname><given-names>Rayif Alharbi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Physics, Faculty Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Walharbi@kau.edu.sa</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>10</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1466</fpage><lpage>1472</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>10,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>13,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Knowledge of radioactivity present in polishing materials enables one to assess any possible radiological risks to human health. In this work, the radioactivity due to the presence of 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th, 
  <sup>40</sup>K, and 
  <sup>37</sup>Cs has been measured in polishing materials con-sumed in Saudi Arabia using gamma spectrometry with HPGe. The activity concentra-tions of 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th, 
  <sup>40</sup>K and 
  <sup>137</sup>Cs ranged from 13.61 &#177; 0.005 to 0.60 &#177; 0.002, 18.43 &#177; 0.003 to 0.78 &#177; 0.001, 342.59 &#177; 0.009 to 2.47 &#177; 0.001 and 1.47 &#177; 0.001 to 0.55 &#177; 0.001 Bq/l, respectively. For 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra and 
  <sup>40</sup>K, the highest values are measured in stainless steel polisher. The highest values also measured in metal polisher (copper-chrome) and disinfectant cleaner and polisher sample for 
  <sup>232</sup>Th and 
  <sup>137</sup>Cs. Radium equivalent activ-ity due to the natural radioactivity of the investigated samples ranged from 51.37 to 1.24 Bq/l. This value is less than the recommended values in the established standards. The evaluated data were compared with the literature data. Our results indicate that no significant radiological hazards arise from using investigated samples hence quite safe to be used as polishing materials.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gamma Spectrometry</kwd><kwd> Radiation Hazard</kwd><kwd> Polishing Materials</kwd><kwd> Natural Radioactivity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Naturally occurring radioisotopes (<sup>238</sup>Th, <sup>232</sup>U series and <sup>40</sup>K) are the main source of both external and internal radiation exposure in humans, whence the radiation finds its way into building materials, air, water, food, and eventually the human body. Human beings are exposed to external radiation from cosmic rays and terrestrial radiation. These isotopes enter the human body by intake from food and inhalation and result in exposure to internal radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref2">2</xref>] . According to the report by UNSCEAR, the total exposure per person resulting from ingestion of terrestrial radioisotopes was 0.3 mSv, of which 0.17 mSv comes from <sup>40</sup>K and 0.12 mSv comes from thorium and uranium series. Exposure from inhalation of terrestrial radioisotopes contributes another 0.01 mSv. Thus, the internal dose of terrestrial radioisotopes can be estimated from the concentrations of natural radioisotopes in foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref3">3</xref>] . Internal radiation exposure, mainly affecting various levels of the respiratory tract, is due to the deposition of short lived progeny products of radon, which are exhaled from building material into indoor air [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref5">5</xref>] . Radon (<sup>222</sup>Rn), a gaseous product of decay of <sup>226</sup>Ra, is extremely important in an indoor exposure. Radon easily diffuses from the ground and building materials to indoor air and is the source of exposing bronchus and lungs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref8">8</xref>] . The isotope <sup>137</sup>Cs is produced anthropogenically by several types of nuclear activity, including past testing of nuclear weapons, accidents in nuclear facilities, reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear power reactors. All these materials contain some amount of natural radionuclides that cause exposure of people to ionizing radiation. The measurement of activity concentrations of radionuclides in polishing materials is important in the assessment of population exposures, as most individuals spend 80% of their time indoors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref9">9</xref>] . Long exposures to low levels of ionizing radiation and poor ventilation of residential buildings can seriously increase health risks to polishing materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref10">10</xref>] . Polishing materials have a variety of chemical natures and some of them are toxic to humans and may cause sickness including cancers and death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref11">11</xref>] . Even nontoxic polishing materials can pollute the land or water. Therefore, care needs to be exercised when using and disposing such materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref12">12</xref>] . The present study was undertaken with the purpose of determining natural radioactivity in some polishing materials. The data obtained are essential for the development of standards and guidelines concerning the use and management of polishing materials.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Sampling and Measurements</title><p>Twenty-two samples representing commercial species of the most commonly consumed polishing materials were collected from Saudi Arabia local market. They were being used for cleaning and polishing purposes of marble, granite, ceramic, tiles, stucco, brick, porcelain, chrome and metal, houses and vehicles. Weighed samples were stored in standard polyethylene Marinelli beakers of 650 cm<sup>3</sup> volume each. The beakers were tightly sealed for 4 - 5 weeks to reach secular equilibrium where the rate of decay of the progeny becomes equal to that of the parent (radium and thorium) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref13">13</xref>] . <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows samples description.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Gamma Spectrometric Measurements</title><p>The activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs were measured with gamma-spectrometric system based on HPGe. The samples were counted using a gamma spectrometry (Canberra coaxial-type Model GC2520) with relative efficiency of 25% and resolution FWHM of 0.2 keV for 1332.5 keV gamma-ray peak of <sup>60</sup>Co and a peak to</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sample code and their description</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marble and ceramic cleaner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Super thick cleaner with Bleach</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ceramic cleaner, disinfectant and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eliminator bad odors cleaner and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Italy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stainless steel cleaner and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U.S.A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metal polisher (copper-chrome)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nederland</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antiseptic disinfectant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U.A.E</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disinfectant, cleaner and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Super polisher for all paint types including metallic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >England</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High glosser, protective paintwork sealant for the perfectionist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >England</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rapidly remover for intensive tar, adhesive, grease, wax, oil and silicone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Britain</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silver polish</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Italy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tiles and surface cleaner(cement, gypsum, rust and dirt remover</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Instant disinfectant, cleaner and polisher pine scent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U.A.E</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Instant disinfectant, cleaner and polisher pine scent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cleaner and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U.S.A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Advanced cleaner and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U.S.A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi-surface cleaner and disinfectant―powerful scent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U.S.A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Windows, mirrors, appliances, counters, Tiles and other smooth surface cleaner and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lime solvent from pots, tube and sinks rust remover, stains from stucco, brick, porcelain, chrome and metal-blasts calcium from glassware and tile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U.S.A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass and household cleaner and polisher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration cleaner and polisher of marble, granite, ceramic and tiles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spain</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Compton ratio of 50:1. The gamma-spectrometry system consists of HPGe connected to a desk top computer provided with a Canberra multichannel analyzer (MCA) in conjunction with a configuration software for spectrum acquisition and evaluation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>The specific activities were averaged from gamma-ray photo peaks at several energies. The gamma-ray lines at 295.2 and 351.9 keV from <sup>214</sup>Pb and at 609.3 and 1764.5 keV from <sup>214</sup>Bi were used to determine the specific activity of <sup>226</sup>Ra. The gamma ray lines of 338.4 keV; 911.2 keV and 968.97 keV from <sup>228</sup>Ac, the 238.58 keV and 727.3 keV from <sup>212</sup>Bi and 583.2 keV from <sup>208</sup>Tl were used to determine the specific activity of <sup>232</sup>Th. The specific activities of <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs were measured directly by its own gamma-ray lines at 1460.8 and 661.66 keV, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref13">13</xref>] . The minimum detectable amount (BDLs) for <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs were 0.312 &#177; 0.16, 0.340 &#177; 0.16, 1.660 &#177; 1.10 and 0.45 &#177; 0.06 Bq/l respectively. Radioactivity concentrations of each sample were measured for about 23 h. The data acquisition, display and spectrum analysis were carried out using a dedicated software program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref16">16</xref>] , which enabled also the concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K to be calculated. The degree of secular equilibrium reached between <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>232</sup>Th and their decay products was taken into account during the concentration calculations.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>The specific activity of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs, in the samples are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The highest average concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs (13.60 &#177; 0.0015, 18.43 &#177; 0.0031, 342.59 &#177; 0.0091and 1.47 &#177; 0.0005 Bq/l respectively) were found in samples P5,</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Average of <sup>226</sup>Ra,<sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and Ra<sub>eq</sub> of polishing materials in the current study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ra<sub>eq</sub> (Bq∙l<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Activity concentration (Bq∙l<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sample code</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>137</sup>Cs<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>238</sup>Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>226</sup>Ra</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.46 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.26 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.19 &#177; 0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.59 &#177; 0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.48 &#177; 0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.61 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.34 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.43 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.64 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.04 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24 &#177; 0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.74 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.23 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.22 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.13 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.93 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.30 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67 &#177; 0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12 &#177; 0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27 &#177; 0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.88 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.14 &#177; 0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.70 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P22</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>ND: Not detected.</p><p>P6, P5 and P8 respectively, whereas the lowest average concentrations<sup> 226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs (0.60 &#177; 0.0015, 0.78 &#177; 0.0011, 2.47 &#177; 0.0005, 0.55 &#177; 0.0008 Bq/l respectively) were found in samples P3, P17, P15 and P5. The <sup>40</sup>K activity concentration dominated over that of the <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>232</sup>Th, as normally happens in samples, while the highest activity level of <sup>40</sup>K (342 Bq/l) which was recorded in sample P5 was lower than that of the global average of 400 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>The variation among the activity levels in different samples may be attributed to the pH, and chemical composition of the raw materials from which they derived [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref18">18</xref>] . Some studies present the concentration values of <sup>226</sup>Ra only and do not consider the <sup>238</sup>U presence taking into account the fact that 98.5% of the radiological effects of the uranium series are produced by radium and its daughters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The activity concentrations of Ra, presented here, fall within the range reported by other authors. Both Th and K in this work revealed higher concentration levels compared to those level for painting oxides and paints. However, their levels were lower than in the case of titanium enamel frits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). According to the recommended reference level of 30, 25 and 370 Bq/kg for <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K, respectively, for the world average concentrations published by UNSCEAR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref1">1</xref>] , it was noted that the obtained results in all samples are lower than the recommended reference level.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Radiological Parameters</title>Radium Equivalent Activities (Ra<sub>eq</sub>)<p>Uniformity of the distribution of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K in materials with respect to radiation exposure has been described by a common index. This index is called the radium equivalent (Ra<sub>eq</sub>) activity and is defined as a weighted sum of the activity concentrations of the above three radionuclides. Ra<sub>eq</sub> is given in Bq∙l<sup>−1</sup> to compare the specific activity of materials containing different amounts of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K. It was assumed that 370 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of <sup>226</sup>Ra, 259 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of <sup>232</sup>Th or 4810 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of <sup>40</sup>K produce the same γ-ray dose rates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref20">20</xref>] ; Ra<sub>eq</sub> is calculated through the following relationship:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.71201-formula144"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-6703079x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where C<sub>Ra</sub>, C<sub>Th</sub>, and C<sub>K</sub> are the specific activities of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K, respectively, expressed in Bq∙l<sup>−1</sup>. The maximum value of Ra<sub>eq</sub> in building materials must be less than 370 Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup> for safe use of materials in the construction of buildings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref1">1</xref>] , to keep the external dose below 1.5 mSv∙y<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref21">21</xref>] . The results obtained by us showed that the lowest</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of concentrations range of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K (Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) recorded in various polishing materials of several studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Materials</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Activity concentration</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>226</sup>Ra<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>232</sup>Th<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>K<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Titanium enamel frits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 - 1018.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 - 1164.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >942.29 - 16,679.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Painting oxides</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35 - 72.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76 - 12.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26 - 200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref23">23</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5 - 43.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 - 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 - 7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.71201-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polishing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 - 13.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 - 18.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47 - 342.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present work</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Ra<sub>eq</sub> was equal to 1.24 Bq∙l<sup>−1</sup> in sample P17, while the highest value reached 51.37 Bq∙l<sup>−1</sup> in in sample P5 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). All the studied samples showed lower values than the recommended worldwide mean value 370 Bq kg<sup>−1</sup>. Thus, every material used to clean and polish of marble, granite, ceramic and tile can be considered to does not reveal a significant radiological hazard.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The activity levels of the natural terrestrial radionuclides as <sup>226</sup> Ra, <sup>232</sup> Th, <sup>40</sup>K and artificial <sup>137</sup>Cs were determined using a gamma-ray spectrometry in 22 samples of polishing materials collected from local stores. The obtained values were, in general, comparable to the corresponding ones obtained from other studies, and they all fell within the average worldwide ranges. Basing on the measurement results, the values of the radium equivalent activities Ra<sub>eq</sub> were calculated to assess the radiological hazard for inhabitants of Jeddah. The obtained values displayed to be below the permissible limiting values.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Alharbi, W.R. (2016) Investigation on <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>238</sup>Th, <sup>40</sup>K and <sup>137</sup>Cs Concentrations in Common Polishing Materials Consumed by Inhabitants in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7, 1466-1472. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2016.711123</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.71201-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, Annex B Exposure from Natural Radiation Sources, United Nations, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maxwell, O., Wagiran, H., Lee, S.K., Embong, Z. and Ugwuoke, P.E. (2015) Radioactivity Level and Toxic Elemental Concentration in Ground Water at Dei-Dei and Kubwa Areas of Abuja, North-Central Nigeria. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 107, 23-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.09.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faanu, A., Adukpo, O.K., Tettey-Larbi, L., et al. (2016) Natural Radioactivity Levels in Soils, Rocks and Water at a Mining Concession of Perseus Gold Mine and Surrounding Towns in Central Region of Ghana. Springerplus, 5, 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1716-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Taher, A. and Madkour, H.A. (2014) Environmental Studies and Radio-Ecological Impacts of Anthropogenic Areas: Shallow Marine Sediments Red Sea, Egypt. Journal of Isotopes in Environment and Health Studies, 50, 120-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2013.826211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stoulos, S., Manolopoulou, M. and Papastefanou, C. (2003) Assessment of Natural Radiation Exposure and Radon Exhalation from Building Materials in Greece. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 69, 225-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00081-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNSCEAR (1988) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, 32nd Session, United Nations, New York, 183-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stidley, C.A. and Samet, J.M. (1993) A Review of Ecological Studies of Lung-Cancer and Indoor Radon. Health Physics, 65, 234-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199309000-00001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alharbi, W.R. and Abbady, A.G.E. (2013) Measurement of Radon Concentrations in Soil and the Extent of Their Impact on the Environment from Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Natural Science, 5, 93-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ns.2013.51015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNSCEAR (1993) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guidotti, L., Carini, F., Rossi, R., Gatti, M., Cenci, R.M. and Beone, G.M. (2015) Gamma-Spectrometric Measurement of Radioactivity in Agricultural Soils of the Lombardia Region, Northern Italy. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 142, 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.01.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Aal, S.A., Korman, A., Stonert, A., Munnik, F. and Turos, A. (2009) Ion Beam Analysis of Ancient Egyptian Wall Paintings. Vacuum, 83, 54-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.01.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adebamowo, E.O., Agbede, O.A., Sridhar, M.K.C. and Adebamowo, C.A. (2006) An Evaluation of Lead Levels in Paints for Residential Use Sold in the Nigerian Market. Indoor and Built Environment, 15, 551-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1420326X06072992</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yussuf, N.M., Hossain, I. and Wagiran, H. (2012) Natural Radioactivity in Drinking and Mineral Water in Johor Bahru (Malaysia). Scientific Research and Essays, 7, 1070-1075.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, N., Singh, J., Esakki, S.C. and Tripathi, R.M. (2016) A Study of the Natural Radioactivity and Radon Exhalation Rate in Some Cements Used in India and Its Radiological Significance. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 9, 47-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Challan, M.B. and El-Taher, A. (2014) Analytical Approach for Radioactivity Correlation of Disc Sources with HPGe Detector Efficiency. Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 85, 23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GENIE-2000 (1997) Basic Spectroscopy (Standalone) V1.2A Copyright (c), Canberra Industries.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehra, R. (2009) Use of Gamma Ray Spectroscopy Measurements for Assessment of the Average Effective Dose from the Analysis of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in Soil Samples. Indoor Built Environ, 18, 270-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1420326X09104140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shanthi, G., Maniyan, C.G., Allan Gnana Raj, G. and Thampi Thanka Kumaran, J. (2009) Radioactivity in Food Crops from High Background Radiation Area in Southwest India. Current Science, 97, 1331-1335.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shousha, H.A. (2006) Radioactive Analysis and Radiological Hazards in Different Types of Egyptian Cement. Radiation Effects &amp; Defects in Solids, 161, 615-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10420150600858371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beretka, J. and Mathew, P.J. (1985) Natural Radioactivity of Australian Building Materials, Industrial Wastes and By-Products. Health Physics, 48, 87-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NEA-OECD (1979) Nuclear Energy Agency, Exposure to Radiation from Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Report by NEA Group of Experts, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, OECD, Paris, France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amekudzie, A., Adukpo O., Annkah, J., Faanu, A. and Emi-Reynolds, G. (2011) Determination of 40K, 226Ra and 232Th Concentration and Radiation Dose Assessment in Titanium Enamel Frits Use in Polishing Household Utensils in Ghana. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 289, 795-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1177-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abel-Ghany, H.A. (2011) Radiation Hazard Assessment in Egyptian Painting Oxides. A Comparative Study. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 33, 225-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-010-9336-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.71201-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, K.K. (2012) Radioactivity in Building Materials in Iraq. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 148, 372-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr033</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>