<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MRC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Modern Research in Catalysis</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2168-4480</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/mrc.2016.54010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MRC-70890</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Hydrogen Evolution from Water under Visible-Light Irradiation Using Keggin-Type Platinum(II)-Coordinated Phospho-, Silico-, and Germanotungstates as Co-Catalysts
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chika</surname><given-names>Nozaki Kato</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shunsaku</surname><given-names>Suzuki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuki</surname><given-names>Ihara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koki</surname><given-names>Aono</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rie</surname><given-names>Yamashita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Keisuke</surname><given-names>Kikuchi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tetsuji</surname><given-names>Okamoto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hidemitsu</surname><given-names>Uno</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Green Chemistry Research Division, Research Institute of Green Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Industrial Research Institute of Shizuoka Prefecture, Shizuoka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry and Biology, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>kato.chika@shizuoka.ac.jp(CNK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>103</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>24,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>September</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The tetramethylammonium salts of diplatinum(II) complexes composed of mono-lacunary Keggin-type silico and germanotungstates, [(CH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>4</sub>N]
  <sub>4</sub>[
  α-SiW
  <sub>11</sub>O
  <sub>39</sub>{
  cis-Pt(NH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>2</sub>}
  <sub>2</sub>]&amp;middot;13H
  <sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Si-Pt) and [(CH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>4</sub>N]
  <sub>4</sub>[
  α-GeW
  <sub>11</sub>O
  <sub>39</sub>{
  cis-Pt(NH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>2</sub>}
  <sub>2</sub>]&amp;middot;11H
  <sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt), were synthesized and crystallized. Single crystals of a tetramethylammonium salt of Keggin-type diplatinum(II)-coordinated phosphotungstate [(CH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>4</sub>N]
  <sub>3</sub>[
  α-PW
  <sub>11</sub>O
  <sub>39</sub>{
  cis-Pt(NH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>2</sub>}
  <sub>2</sub>]&#215;10H
  <sub>2</sub>O (TMA-P-Pt) were also obtained. The X-ray structural analyses revealed that the two 
  cis-platinum(II) moieties, [
  cis-Pt(NH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>2</sub>]
  <sup>2+</sup>, were each coordinated to two oxygen atoms in a mono-vacant site of [XW
  <sub>11</sub>O
  <sub>39</sub>]
  <sup>(12-n)-</sup> (X
  <sup>n+</sup> = Si
  <sup>4+</sup>, Ge
  <sup>4+</sup>, P
  <sup>5+</sup>). FTIR spectra of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt also suggested that the two platinum(II) moieties were 
  coordinated to the vacant site of [SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>8-</sup> and [GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>8-</sup>. The <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub> of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt showed signals assigned to the two sets of NH<sub>3</sub> ligands coordinated to the platinum sites. These three platinum compounds showed hydrogen evolution from aqueous triethanolamine solution under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm) in the presence of eosin Y, α-Keggin mono-aluminum-substituted silicotungstate, and titanium dioxide. The catalytic activities were influenced by the central atoms, and TMA-P-Pt showed the highest activities among the three platinum compounds.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Polyoxometalates</kwd><kwd> Diplatinum(II) Complex</kwd><kwd> Hydrogen Evolution</kwd><kwd> Visible Light</kwd><kwd> X-Ray Crystallography</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The development of photocatalysts, especially those that work under visible light irradiation, for the production of hydrogen from water is a critical issue in establishing clean energy systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref3">3</xref>] . Among the various possible photocatalysts, platinum is widely used as a co-catalyst to construct efficient photocatalytic systems for producing hydrogen because platinum promotes the separation of photo-generated electrons and holes and improves the efficiency of photocatalysis when it acts as the active center for hydrogen evolution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Therefore, we have synthesized tetramethylammonium and cesium salts of α-Keggin diplatinum-coordinated phosphotungstate, [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>3</sub>[PW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]&#215;10H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-P-Pt) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref5">5</xref>] and Cs<sub>3</sub>[α-PW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]∙8H<sub>2</sub>O (Cs-P-Pt) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref6">6</xref>] , and have constructed a novel photocatalytic system with Cs-P-Pt, eosin Y (EY), α-Keggin mono-aluminum-substituted polyoxotungstate K<sub>5</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>{Al(OH<sub>2</sub>)}O<sub>39</sub>]∙7H<sub>2</sub>O (K-Si-Al), and titanium dioxide to improve the effective utilization of platinum sites. This system achieved a steady hydrogen production during 12 h of light irradiation with highly effective utilization of the platinum sites for hydrogen production from aqueous triethanolamine (TEA) solutions under visible light irradiation (l ≥ 400 nm, ≥440 nm, and ≥500 nm) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref7">7</xref>] . During the light irradiation, we observed the formation of a reduced species (heteropoly blue species; HPB) of Cs-P-Pt, which was the key to achieving a steady hydrogen evolution during a 12 h of light irradiation. This is because it acted as a photosensitizer in the later stages, and compensated for the decline in hydrogen production caused by the decomposition of EY. Fu and Lu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref8">8</xref>] reported that the rate of HPB formation for XW<sub>12</sub>O<sub>40</sub><sup>(</sup><sup>8−n)−</sup> (X<sup>n</sup><sup>+</sup> = P<sup>5+</sup>, Ge<sup>4+</sup>, Si<sup>4+</sup>, B<sup>3+</sup>) is a key factor in determining hydrogen evolution rates under visible light irradiation, which is influenced by the central atoms in the polyoxoanions. In contrast, Wang and co-workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref9">9</xref>] observed no significant effect of the central atom on hydrogen evolution from 20% methanol aqueous solution catalyzed by (HTEA)<sub>2</sub>{[Na(TEA)<sub>2</sub>]H[SiW<sub>12</sub>O<sub>40</sub>]}&#215;5H<sub>2</sub>O, (HTEA)<sub>2</sub>{[Na(TEA)<sub>2</sub>][PW<sub>12</sub>O<sub>40</sub>]}&#215;4H<sub>2</sub>O, and (HTEA)<sub>2</sub>{[Na(TEA)<sub>2</sub>]H[GeW<sub>12</sub>O<sub>40</sub>]}&#215;4H<sub>2</sub>O with 1% Pt co-catalyst under a 300 W Xe lamp (without filter).</p><p>In this study, we synthesized the tetramethylammonium salts of Keggin-type diplatinum(II)-coordinated silico- and germanotungstates, [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・13H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Si-Pt) and [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・11H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt), by the reaction of mono- lacunary Keggin-type silico- or germanotungstate with cis-diamminedichloroplati- num(II) (cisplatin) in an aqueous solution. These compounds were characterized by X-ray crystallography, elemental analysis, thermogravimetric/differential thermal analyses (TG/DTA), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), cyclic voltammetry, and solution <sup>1</sup>H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The molecular structure of TMA-P-Pt was also determined by X-ray crystallography. Furthermore, we used TMA- P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt, and TMA-Ge-Pt as co-catalysts, and investigated their photocatalytic activities for hydrogen evolution from aqueous TEA solutions under light irradiation (l ≥ 400 nm) in the presence of EY, K-Si-Al, and titanium dioxide. The rates of EY (and fluorescein-like species) decomposition and the amounts of HPB anions were also monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials and Methods</title><p>The K<sub>8</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・17H<sub>2</sub>O [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref10">10</xref>] , K<sub>6</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>[GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・12H<sub>2</sub>O [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref11">11</xref>] , [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>3</sub>[α-PW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・10H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-P-Pt) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref5">5</xref>] , and K<sub>5</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>{Al(OH<sub>2</sub>)}O<sub>39</sub>]∙7H<sub>2</sub>O (K-Si-Al) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref7">7</xref>] were prepared as described in the literature. The number of solvated water molecules was determined by thermogravimetric/differen- tial thermal analysis (TG/DTA). [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・13H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Si-Pt) and [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・11H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt) were synthesized using a modification of the published method for TMA-P-Pt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref5">5</xref>] . The synthesis and characterization of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt are described in the supporting information. The crystallization of TMA-P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt, and TMA-Ge-Pt for X-ray crystallography is also described in the supporting information. All of the reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and were used as received. Titanium dioxide (anatase:rutile = 80:20) was obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. The elemental analysis results for C, H, and N were obtained using Flash EA (Thermo Electron Corporation) at Shizuoka University (Japan). The elemental analysis of Si, Ge, Pt, and W was carried out by Mikroanalytisches Labor Pascher (Remagen, Germany) and the Industrial Research Institute of Shizuoka Prefecture (Japan). The samples were dried overnight at ambient temperatures under 10<sup>−3</sup> - 10<sup>−4</sup> Torr vacuum before analysis. The TG/DTA data were obtained using Rigaku Thermo Plus EVO2 TG/DTA 81205Z instruments in air while increasing the temperature from 20˚C to 500˚C at a rate of 4˚C/min. The <sup>1</sup>H (600.17 MHz) and <sup>31</sup>P-{<sup>1</sup>H} (242.95 MHz) NMR spectra in solutions were recorded in 5-mm outer diameter tubes on a JEOL ECA-600 NMR spectrometer (Shizuoka University). The <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra were measured in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub> with reference to an internal 3-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt (DSS). Chemical shifts were reported as positive for resonances downfield of DSS (δ 0). The <sup>31</sup>P NMR spectra were measured in D<sub>2</sub>O with reference to an external standard of 85% H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> in a sealed capillary. Chemical shifts were reported as negative on the δ scale for resonances upfield of H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (δ 0). Solution ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectra were recorded using a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum Lambda 650 spectrophotometer. Cyclic voltammetry was measured by the Industrial Research Institute of Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. The measurements were carried out by using a glassy carbon working electrode (diameter, 3 mm), a platinum wire counter electrode, and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode (saturated KCl, TOYO Corporation) at approximately 20˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. X-Ray Crystallography</title><p>A yellow block crystal of TMA-P-Pt (0.080 &#215; 0.040 &#215; 0.040 mm), TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n) (0.060 &#215; 0.060 &#215; 0.050 mm), TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c) (0.080 &#215; 0.040 &#215; 0.040 mm), TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n) (0.030 &#215; 0.030 &#215; 0.020 mm), and TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c) (0.050 &#215; 0.030 &#215; 0.020 mm) was mounted on a loop or MicroMount. The measurement for TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n) were obtained using a Rigaku VariMax with a Saturn diffractometer using multi-layer mirror- monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71075 &#197;) at 100 &#177; 1 K. The measurement for TMA-P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c), TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c), and TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c) was carried out using a Rigaku VariMax with an XtaLAB P200 diffractometer using multi-layer mirror-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71075 &#197;) at 153 &#177; 1 K. Data were collected and processed using CrystalClear, CrystalClear-SM Expert for Windows, and structural analysis was performed using CrystalStructure for Windows. The structure was solved by SHELXS-2013 and refined by SHELXL-2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref12">12</xref>] . For the three platinum-coordinated polyoxoanions, 11 tungsten atoms, 2 platinum atoms, single phosphorus atom (or a silicon atom and a germanium atom), 4 nitrogen atoms, and 39 oxygen atoms were clarified. The three tetramethylammonium ions for TMA-P-Pt and four ions for TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt were also identified; however, the solvated water molecules could not be modeled due to the disorder of the atoms. Accordingly, the residual electron density was removed using the SQUEEZE routine in PLATON [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref13">13</xref>] . We noticed that at least two polymorphisms with space group of P2<sub>1</sub>/n and P2<sub>1</sub>/c were contained in the crystals of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt. The crystal data, molecular structures, and unit cell packings are shown in the supporting information.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Photocatalytic Reaction</title><p>Typical photocatalytic reactions were carried out at 25˚C. TMA-P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt, and TMA-Ge-Pt (0.5 - 2.0 μmol of Pt), EY (2.5 μmol), K<sub>5</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>{Al(OH<sub>2</sub>)}O<sub>39</sub>]∙7H<sub>2</sub>O (K-Si-Al) (2.5 μmol), and TiO<sub>2</sub> (anatase:rutile = 80:20) (50 mg) were dissolved in 10 mL of 100 mM aqueous triethanolamine (TEA) solution at pH 7.0. The solution was placed into a glass reaction vessel, which was connected to a Pyrex conventional closed gas circulation system (245.5 cm<sup>3</sup>). The photoreaction was initiated by light irradiation using a 300 W Xe lamp equipped with a cut-off filter (λ ≥ 400 nm). The evolution of H<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, CO, and CH<sub>4</sub> was analyzed using a gas chromatograph (thermal conductivity detector, Molecular Sieve 5A stainless columns). The samples were assigned after comparison with standard samples analyzed under the same conditions. The turnover number (TON) was calculated as 2[H<sub>2</sub> evolved (mol)]/[Pt atoms (mol)].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>To investigate the influence of central atoms in α-Keggin diplatinum(II)-coordinated polyoxotungstates on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, we synthesized two platinum compounds, [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・13H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Si-Pt) and [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・11H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt), by a 2:1 stoichiometric reaction of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin) with mono-lacunary Keggin silico- and germanotungstates, [SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>8−</sup> and [GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>8−</sup>, in an aqueous solution at 25&#176;C under atmospheric conditions, as previously reported for TMA-P-Pt (see supporting information; Scheme S1 and Scheme S2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref5">5</xref>] . TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt were finally isolated as analytically pure, yellow crystalline powder at 31% and 44% yield, respectively. A single crystal of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt for X-ray crystallography was obtained by vapor diffusion from water/ethanol at 25˚C. The TMA-P-Pt was successfully crystallized by vapor diffusion from water/acetone at 25˚C.</p><p>The elemental analyses results were in good agreement with the calculated values for the chemical formula of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt with 13 and 11 hydrated water molecules (see supporting information). The weight loss observed during drying before analysis was 4.42% and 4.52% for TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt, corresponding to nine weakly solvated or adsorbed water molecules. In contrast, during TG/DTA under atmospheric conditions, a weight loss of 6.05% and 5.22% was observed below 259.8˚C and 210.8˚C, corresponding to 13 and 11 water molecules, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S1 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S2). Therefore, the number of water molecules (13) and (11) observed by TG/DTA under atmospheric conditions was consistent with the sum of hydrated water molecules (4) and (2) indicated by elemental analysis and the number of water molecules (9) corresponding to the weight loss observed during drying before analysis. In addition, a weight loss of 10.5% and 9.89% was observed in the temperature range from 259.8˚C to 420˚C and 210.8˚C to 403.4˚C, corresponding to the sum of four tetramethylammonium ions and four ammonia molecules, respectively.</p><p>The molecular structures and solid-state packings of TMA-P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt, and TMA-Ge-Pt are illustrated in Figures S3-S12. Selected bond lengths and angles around the platinum centers are summarized in Tables S1-S5. For the all compounds, the three and four tetramethylammonium ions were observed by X-ray crystallography; however, the hydrated water molecules could not be identified because of the disorder. The X-ray crystallography of these platinum compounds revealed that the two cis-platinum(II) moieties, [cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, were coordinated each to the two oxygen atoms in a mono-vacant site of [XW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>(12−n)−</sup> (X<sup>n</sup><sup>+</sup> = Si<sup>4+</sup>, Ge<sup>4+</sup>, P<sup>5+</sup>), as previously reported for Cs-P-Pt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref6">6</xref>] . The TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt crystals contained at least two polymorphisms with space group of P2<sub>1</sub>/n and P2<sub>1</sub>/c, while the TMA-P-Pt and Cs-P-Pt crystals did not contain polymorphisms for at least a dozen measurements.</p><p>The FTIR spectra of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt measured as KBr disks are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S13 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S14. The spectral patterns of TMA-Si-Pt (1006, 950, 892, 875, 840, 790, 734, 708, and 524 cm<sup>−1</sup>) and TMA-Ge-Pt (958, 950, 876, 839, 816, 790, 768, 717, 697, and 526 cm<sup>−1</sup>) were different from those of K<sub>8</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・17H<sub>2</sub>O (997, 961, 896, 799, 733, 539, and 515 cm<sup>−1</sup>) and K<sub>6</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>[GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・12H<sub>2</sub>O (957, 880, 848, 799, 720, 518, and 466 cm<sup>−1</sup>), suggesting that the two platinum(II) moieties were coordinated to the vacant site of [SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>8−</sup> and [GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>8−</sup>.</p><p>The <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra of TMA-Si-Pt in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub> showed two signals at 4.33 ppm and 4.37 ppm with 1:1 intensities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S15). As previously reported for TMA-P-Pt and Cs-P-Pt, the two <sup>1</sup>H signals were due to the two sets of NH<sub>3</sub> ligands coordinated to the platinum sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref6">6</xref>] . For TMA-Ge-Pt, a broad signal was observed at 4.37 ppm because of an overlap of the two signals of NH<sub>3</sub> ligands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S16).</p><p>The UV-Vis spectra (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S17 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S18) of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt in water showed two broad absorption bands at 322 nm (ε 6775 M<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>) and 406 nm (ε 1223 M<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>), and 323 nm (ε 7204 M<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>) and 409 nm (ε 1087 M<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>). The bands at 322 nm and 323 nm were assigned to the charge transfer bands of W-O and a broad band at 406 nm and 409 nm due to the two platinum(II) atoms, as previously reported for TMA-P-Pt and Cs-P-Pt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The photocatalytic activities of TMA-P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt, and TMA-Ge-Pt at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μmol Pt were determined for the evolution of hydrogen from 100 mM aqueous TEA solution (pH 7.0) under light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm) in the presence of EY, K-Si-Al, and TiO<sub>2</sub>. Here, TEA was employed as an electron donor. During the photoreactions, the platinum and aluminum compounds and EY were soluble in the aqueous TEA solution. Hydrogen was formed with 100% selectivity, and O<sub>2</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, and CH<sub>4</sub> were not detected under these reaction conditions. For the three platinum compounds, the amount of hydrogen increased with time, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>1 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S19. In the platinum range of 0.5 - 2.0 μmol, the order of TONs after 5 h was TMA-P-Pt &gt; TMA-Ge-Pt &gt; TMA-Si-Pt, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>.</p><p>To determine whether the amounts of HPB anions of TMA-P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt, and TMA-Ge-Pt were influenced by the central atoms or not, UV-Vis spectra of a mixture of EY (2.5 μmol) and platinum compounds (2.0 μmol Pt) were observed in 100 mM aqueous TEA solution at pH 7 (10 mL) under the light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>1</label><caption><title> Time course for hydrogen evolution from aqueous triethanolamine (TEA) solution under visible light irradiation. Reaction conditions: TMA-P-Pt (○), TMA-Si-Pt (△), and TMA-Ge-Pt (□) ((a) 0.5 μmol and (b) 2.0 μmol of Pt), EY (2.5 μmol), K-Si-Al (2.5 μmol), TiO<sub>2</sub> (anatase:rutile = 80:20) 50 mg, 100 mM TEA aqueous solution (10 mL, pH 7), light irradiation at λ ≥ 400 nm at 25˚C</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x2.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Hydrogen evolution from aqueous triethanolamine (TEA) solution under visible light irradiation<sup>a</sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pt complexes (μmol of Pt atom)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reaction time (h)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub> (μmol)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TON<sup>b</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-P-Pt (0.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.7 189.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235 758</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Si-Pt (0.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.3 130.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137 522</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Ge-Pt (0.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.0 162.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228 651</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-P-Pt (1.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.6 252.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167 505</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Si-Pt (1.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.0 166.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112 332</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Ge-Pt (1.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.7 193.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153 388</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-P-Pt (2.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.2 301.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 301</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Si-Pt (2.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.1 207.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 208</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Ge-Pt (2.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.6 230.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78 231</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-P-Pt (2.0)<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.4 125.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Si-Pt (2.0)<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.1 79.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TMA-Ge-Pt (2.0)<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.9 102.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 102</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Reaction conditions: platinum complexes (0.2 - 2.0 μmol of Pt), K-Si-Al (2.5 μmol), EY (2.5 μmol), TiO<sub>2</sub> (anatase:rutile = 80:20) 50 mg, 100 mM TEA aq. soln. (pH 7; 10 mL), 25˚C, light (λ ≥ 400 nm); <sup>b</sup>Turnover number (TON) = 2[H<sub>2</sub> evolved (mol)]/[Pt atoms (mol)]; <sup>c</sup>Without TiO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>Before light irradiation, all spectra were the same as those of EY; thus, the bands of the platinum compounds were not observed because they were hidden by large bands of EY. During the light irradiation, a large band at approximately 520 nm was sifted to approximately 490 nm, which was assigned to a fluorescein-like species, as previously reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref15">15</xref>] . The shift was observed after at least 0.5 h of light irradiation, and the absorbance gradually decreased with time. We noticed that the rates of decrease in absorbance for TMA-Ge-Pt were much slower than those for TMA-P-Pt and TMA-Si-Pt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>2). Thus, a decomposition of fluorescein-like species was the most restrained in the presence of TMA-Ge-Pt. In contrast, a new broad band due to HPB was observed at around 650, 648, and 654 nm under light irradiation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>3) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref16">16</xref>] . During 4 h of light irradiation, the absorbance of HPB formed by reduction of W(VI) sites in the platinum compounds increased with time, decreasing in the order TMA-P-Pt &gt; TMA-Ge-Pt &gt; TMA-Si-Pt, which is consistent with that of hydrogen generation. In contrast, the absorbance of HPB in TMA-P-Pt and TMA-Si-Pt</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>2</label><caption><title> UV-vis spectra in 100 mM aqueous triethanolamine (TEA) solution at pH 7 of a mixture of platinum compounds (1.0 &#180; 10<sup>−4</sup> M) and EY (2.5 &#180; 10<sup>−4</sup> M) after 5 h of light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm). The fluorescein-like species were observed at around 490 nm for TMA-P-Pt (blue line), TMA-Si-Pt (red), and TMA-Ge-Pt (green)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x3.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>3</label><caption><title> (a) UV-vis spectra in 100 mM aqueous triethanolamine (TEA) solution at pH 7 of a mixture of platinum compounds (1.0 &#180; 10<sup>−4</sup> M) and EY (2.5 &#180; 10<sup>−4</sup> M) after (a) 3.5 h and (b) 5 h of light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm). The HPB were observed at around 650, 648, and 654 nm for TMA-P-Pt (blue line), TMA-Si-Pt (red), and TMA-Ge-Pt (green). Inset: a plot of absorbance observed at 650, 648, and 654 nm with time</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x4.png"/></fig><p>decreased after 5 h of light irradiation, and the order of absorbance changed to TMA-Ge-Pt &gt; TMA-P-Pt &gt; TMA-Si-Pt. The decrease of absorbance might be due to the lifetime of HPB and/or the remaining amounts of fluorescein-like species. However, the order of photocatalytic activities did not change during 5 h of irradiation even under the same reaction conditions as those of UV-vis measurements (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). Thus, the photocatalytic activities of platinum compounds were not decided by the amounts of sensitizers alone (i.e., fluorescein-like species and HPB anions, under the present reaction conditions).</p><p>Here, the cyclic voltammograms of TMA-P-Pt, TMA-Si-Pt, and TMA-Ge-Pt were measured in 0.1 M NaClO<sub>4</sub> aqueous solution (pH 5.5) at a scan rate of 100 mV/s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>4). The TMA-P-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt had two reduction potentials (values at the maximum of the first and second reduction waves) at (−0.837 and −1.05 V) and (−1.02 and −1.31 V) in the potential range from 0.0 to −1.5 V, and TMA-Si-Pt showed a reduction potential at approximately −1.07 V; these are likely one-electron reduction of W(VI) sites at pH 5.5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70890-ref17">17</xref>] . These redox pairs were reproducible in multiple scans at scan rates of 10-300 mV/s, revealing that the platinum compounds were stable during the reversible redox processes. This was also supported by the result that no clear deactivation was observed during 6 h of light irradiation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>1). These results suggest that a slower decrease of absorbance observed in TMA-Ge-Pt after 5 h of light irradiation was not due to the stability of platinum compounds. When mono-lacunary</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>4</label><caption><title> Cyclic voltammograms in 0.1 M NaClO<sub>4</sub> (pH 5.5) of TMA-P-Pt (blue line), TMA-Si-Pt (red), and TMA-Ge-Pt (green) at a scan rate of 100 mV/s</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x5.png"/></fig><p>Keggin-type polyoxotungstates [XW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>(</sup><sup>12−n)−</sup> (X<sup>n</sup><sup>+</sup> = Si<sup>4+</sup>, Ge<sup>4+</sup>, P<sup>5+</sup>) were used instead of platinum compounds under the same reaction conditions as those of UV-Vis measurements, a remarkable difference in the UV-Vis spectra of [GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>8−</sup> was not observed during 5-h light irradiation. These results suggested that a coordination of cis-platinum(II) moieties to the mono-vacant site in Keggin-type germanotungstate caused a specific influence to a decomposition of fluorescein-like species, and a long-lived fluorescein-like species could cause a slower decrease of absorbance of HPB in TMA-Ge-Pt. Further studies into these reaction mechanisms are in progress, and we will report the results in due course.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Summary</title><p>Monomeric diplatinum complexes composed of mono-lacunary α-Keggin silico- and germanotungstates were synthesized and characterized by X-ray structure analysis, elemental analysis, TG/DTA, FTIR, cyclic voltammetry, UV-Visible, and <sup>1</sup>H solution NMR spectroscopy. We successfully obtained single crystals of tetramethylammonium salts [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・13H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Si-Pt) and [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・11H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt) by reacting cisplatin with mono-lacunary α-Keggin polyoxoanions, followed by vapor diffusion from water/ethanol. The crystals of TMA-Si-Pt and TMA-Ge-Pt contained at least two polymorphisms with space group of P2<sub>1</sub>/n and P2<sub>1</sub>/c. Furthermore, single crystals of a tetramethylammonium salt of α-Keggin diplatinum-coordinated phosphotungstate [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>3</sub>[PW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]&#215;10H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-P-Pt) were obtained via vapour diffusion from water/acetone, and polymorphism was not observed under the present conditions. Single-crystal X-ray structure analyses of the three platinum compounds revealed that the two cis-platinum(II) moieties, [cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, were coordinated each to two oxygen atoms in a mono-vacant site of [XW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]<sup>(12−n)−</sup> (X<sup>n</sup><sup>+</sup> = Si<sup>4+</sup>, Ge<sup>4+</sup>, P<sup>5+</sup>). The three platinum compounds exhibited hydrogen evolution from aqueous TEA solution under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 400 nm) in the presence of eosin Y, α-Keggin mono-aluminum-substituted silicotungstate, and titanium dioxide. The order of photo- catalytic activities was TMA-P-Pt &gt; TMA-Ge-Pt &gt; TMA-Si-Pt; thus, the central atoms in platinum compounds affected the photocatalytic activities. The rates of fluorescein- like species decomposition and the amounts of HPB anions were also influenced by the central atoms, and TMA-Ge-Pt exhibited a specific influence. However, the order of rates in fluorescein-like species decomposition and amounts of HPB anions did not necessarily accord with that of photocatalytic activities under the present reaction conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. We also acknowledge Mr. Hattori (Shizuoka University) for preliminary experiments regarding the synthesis and crystallization of TMA-P-Pt and TMA-Si-Pt.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kato, C.N., Suzuki, S., Ihara, Y., Aono, K., Yamashita, R., Kikuchi, K., Okamoto, T. and Uno, H. (2016) Hydrogen Evolution from Water under Visible-Light Irradiation Using Keggin-Type Pla- tinum(II)-Coordinated Phospho-, Silico-, and Germanotungstates as Co-Catalysts. Mo- dern Research in Catalysis, 5, 103-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/mrc.2016.54010</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Supporting Information</title><p>Synthesis and crystallization of [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・13H<sub>2</sub>O</p><p>(TMA-Si-Pt): K<sub>8</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・17H<sub>2</sub>O (0.659 g; 0.20 mmol) was added to a solution of cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> (0.120 g; 0.40 mmol) dissolved in 160 mL of water at 70˚C. After stirring for 4 h at 70˚C, a yellow precipitate was formed. The yellow precipitate was removed off through a membrane filter (JG 0.2 μm), and solid (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>NCl (13.152 g; 120 mmol) was added to the filtrate, and stirred for two days at 25˚C. Then, a yellow precipitate was collected by a membrane filter (JG 0.2 μm). For purification, the crude product was dissolved in H<sub>2</sub>O (5 mL of water per 100 mg of crude product) at 70˚C, followed by crystallization from ethanol at 25˚C. A yellow precipitate was collected by a membrane filter (JG 0.2 μm). The obtained product was dissolved in water (15 mL of water per 100 mg of product) at 70˚C, and crystallized from ethanol at 25˚C again. The obtained product was 0.1145 g (the yield calculated on the basis of [mol of TMA-Si-Pt]/ [mol of K<sub>8</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・17H<sub>2</sub>O] &#180; 100 was 31%). For the X-ray crystal measurement, the crystals were obtained by vapor diffusion from water (1 - 1.5 mL of water per 10 mg</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70890-formula20"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Scheme S1. Synthetic diagram of TMA-Si-Pt.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70890-formula21"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Scheme S2. Synthetic diagram of TMA-Ge-Pt.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S1</label><caption><title> TG/DTA data of TMA-Si-Pt</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S2</label><caption><title> TG/DTA data of TMA-Ge-Pt</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S3</label><caption><title> Molecular structure (ORTEP drawing) of TMA-P-Pt</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x10.png"/></fig><p>of product)/ethanol at 25˚C. Elemental analysis results showed: C, 5.21; H, 2.01; N, 3.06; Si, 0.78; Pt, 11.3%. Calculations for [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・xH<sub>2</sub>O (x = 4) = C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>68</sub>N<sub>8</sub>Pt<sub>2</sub>O<sub>43</sub>Si<sub>1</sub>W<sub>11</sub>: C, 5.49; H, 1.96; N, 3.20; Si, 0.80; Pt, 11.14%. A weight loss of 4.42% was observed during overnight drying at room temperature under 10<sup>−3</sup> - 10<sup>−4</sup> torr before analysis, suggesting the presence of 9 weakly solvated or adsorbed water molecules</p><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S4</label><caption><title> Solid-state packing of TMA-P-Pt</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S5</label><caption><title> Molecular structure (ORTEP drawing) of TMA-Si-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/n)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x12.png"/></fig><p>(4.43%). TG/DTA under atmospheric conditions showed a weight loss of 6.05% with- out a clear endothermic point observed below 259.8˚C; calculations showed 6.39% for 13 water molecules (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S1). Additionally, a weight loss of 10.5% with three exothermic peaks at 268.7˚C, 291.9˚C, and 401.1˚C was observed in the temperature range</p><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S6</label><caption><title> Solid-state packing of TMA-Si-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/n)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S7</label><caption><title> Molecular structure (ORTEP drawing) of TMA-Si-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/c)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x14.png"/></fig><p>from 259.8˚C to 420˚C; calculations showed four [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sup>+</sup> and four NH<sub>3</sub> molecules (total calcd: 10.0%). IR (KBr disk) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S13) results in the 1300 - 400 cm<sup>−1</sup> region (polyoxometalate region) showed: 1006 m, 950 s, 892 s, 875 s, 840 s, 790 s, 734 s, 708 s, and 524m cm<sup>−1</sup>. <sup>1</sup>H NMR (DMSO-d<sub>6</sub>, 20.4˚C; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S15): 2.53 (DMSO), 3.13 (CH<sub>3</sub>), 3.39 (H<sub>2</sub>O), 4.33 (NH<sub>3</sub>), and 4.37 (NH<sub>3</sub>). UV-vis absorption (in H<sub>2</sub>O, 7.0 &#180; 10<sup>−5</sup> M;</p><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S8</label><caption><title> Solid-state packing of TMA-Si-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/c)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x15.png"/></fig><fig id="fig13"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S9</label><caption><title> Molecular structure (ORTEP drawing) of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/n)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x16.png"/></fig><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S17) showed: λ 322 nm (ε 6775 M<sup>−1</sup>cm<sup>−1</sup>) and λ 406 nm (ε 1123 M<sup>−1</sup>cm<sup>−1</sup>).</p><p>Synthesis and crystallization of [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・11H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt): A solution of K<sub>6</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>[GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・12H<sub>2</sub>O (0.645 g; 0.20 mmol) dissolved in 40 mL of water was added to a solution of cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> (0.120 g; 0.40 mmol)</p><fig id="fig14"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S10</label><caption><title>Solid-state packing of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/n)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x17.png"/></fig><fig id="fig15"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S11</label><caption><title> Molecular structure (ORTEP drawing) of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/c)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x18.png"/></fig><p>dissolved in 150 mL of water at 25˚C. After stirring for 10 days at 25˚C, a yellow precipitate was formed. The yellow precipitate was removed off through a membrane filter (JG 0.2 μm), and solid (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>NCl (3.50 g; 16.0 mmol) was added to the filtrate, and stirred for 3 hours in an ice bath. Then, a yellow precipitate was collected by a membrane filter (JG 0.2 μm), and washed with a small amount of ethanol. For purification,</p><fig id="fig16"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S12</label><caption><title> Solid-state packing of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/c)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x19.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1</label><caption><title> Selected bond lengths and angles around the platinum centers of TMA-P-Pt</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lengths (&#197;)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.021(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.729(13)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.997(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.756(13)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.049(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.793(13)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.999(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.792(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.768</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.030(16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.932(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.054(16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.886(12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.028(17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.924(13)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.057(17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.958(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.925</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)&#215;&#215;&#215;Pt(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.267</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Angles (˚)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.8(7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)-W(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.0(8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.4(7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)-W(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.0(9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.3(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.2(6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.8(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.7(6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(10)-Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.0(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(11)-Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.1(7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(1)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.9(7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.0(7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.5(7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.6(6)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S2</label><caption><title> Selected bond lengths (&#197;) and angles (˚) around the platinum centers of TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lengths (&#197;)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.963(14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.760(14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.060(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.804(14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.009(14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.646(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.086(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.643(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.713</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.013(18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.884(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.061(12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.925(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.030(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.905(12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.094(18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.932(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.912</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)&#215;&#215;&#215;Pt(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.237</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Angles (˚)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.4(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)-W(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.9(7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.3(8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)-W(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.0(9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.2(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.2(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.8(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.6(7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(10)-Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.0(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(11)-Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.8(6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(1)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8(7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.3(8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.4(8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.7(7)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the crude product (0.589 g) was dissolved in 20 mL of water at 70˚C, followed by standing in a refrigerator at around 5˚C. A yellow crystals was collected by a membrane filter (JG 0.2 μm). The obtained product was 0.320 g (the yield calculated on the basis of [mol of TMA-Ge-Pt]/[mol of K<sub>6</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>[GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・12H<sub>2</sub>O] &#180; 100 was 44%). For the X-ray crystal measurement, the crystals were obtained by vapor diffusion from water (7.0 mL of water per 100 mg of product)/ethanol at 25˚C. Elemental analysis results showed: C, 5.25; H, 2.03; N, 3.05; Ge, 1.98; W, 57.7; Pt, 11.2%. Calculations for</p><p>[(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・xH<sub>2</sub>O (x = 2) = C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>64</sub>N<sub>8</sub>Pt<sub>2</sub>O<sub>41</sub>Ge<sub>1</sub>W<sub>11</sub>: C, 5.48; H, 1.84; N, 3.19; Ge, 2.07; W, 57.62; Pt, 11.12%. A weight loss of 4.51% was observed during overnight drying at room temperature under 10<sup>−3</sup> - 10<sup>−4</sup> torr before analysis, suggesting the presence of 9 weakly solvated or adsorbed water molecules (4.42%). TG/DTA under atmospheric conditions showed a weight loss of 5.22% without a clear endothermic point observed below 210.8˚C; calculations showed 5.4% for 11 water molecules (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S2). Additionally, a weight loss of 9.89% with three exothermic</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S3</label><caption><title> Selected bond lengths (&#197;) and angles (˚) around the platinum centers of TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lengths (&#197;)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.978(9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.851(9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.997(12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.784(9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.907(9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.775(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.990(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.780(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.968</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.798</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.004(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.920(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.032(15)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.884(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.995(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.922(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.020(14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.922(9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.912</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)&#215;&#215;&#215;Pt(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.275</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Angles (˚)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.3(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)-W(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.2(7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.9(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)-W(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.5(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.3(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.6(4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.0(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.8(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(10)-Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.4(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(11)-Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.6(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(1)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.2(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.7(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.8(5)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>peaks at 268.8, 285.0, and 315.9˚C was observed in the temperature range from 210.8 to 403.4˚C; calculations showed four [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sup>+</sup> and four NH<sub>3</sub> molecules (total calcd: 9.9%). IR (KBr disk) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S14) results in the 1300 - 400 cm<sup>−1</sup> region (polyoxometalate region) showed: 958 s, 950 s, 876 s, 839 s, 816 s, 790 s, 768 s, 717 s, 697 s, and 526 m cm<sup>−1</sup>. <sup>1</sup>H NMR (DMSO-d<sub>6</sub>, 21.9˚C; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S16): 2.53 (DMSO), 3.17 (CH<sub>3</sub>), 3.36 (H<sub>2</sub>O), and 4.37 (NH<sub>3</sub>). UV-vis absorption (in H<sub>2</sub>O, 7.1 &#180; 10<sup>−5</sup> M; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S18) showed: λ 323 nm (ε 7204 M<sup>−1</sup>cm<sup>−1</sup>) and λ 409 nm (ε 1087 M<sup>−1</sup>cm<sup>−1</sup>).</p><p>Crystallization of [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>3</sub>[PW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]&#215;10H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-P-Pt): A powder sample of TMA-P-Pt (69.3 mg) was dissolved in 23 mL of water at 25˚C. The crystallization was performed by vapor diffusion from acetone at 25˚C for a week. The characterization results obtained by TG/DTA, <sup>1</sup>H and <sup>31</sup>P NMR, and FT-IR spectroscopy were completely identical with those of the powder sample.</p><p>Crystal data for [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>3</sub>[PW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]&#215;10H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-P-Pt):</p><p>C<sub>12</sub>H<sub>68</sub>N<sub>7</sub>Pt<sub>2</sub>O<sub>49</sub>P<sub>1</sub>W<sub>11</sub>; M = 3538.19, triclinic, space group: P-1 (#2), a = 13.232(3) &#197;, b =</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S4</label><caption><title> Selected bond lengths (&#197;) and angles (˚) around the platinum centers of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lengths (&#197;)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.986(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.787(12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.013(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.790(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.986(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.780(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.005(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.774(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.783</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.023(16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.937(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.018(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.895(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.013(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.957(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.049(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.949(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.935</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)&#215;&#215;&#215;Pt(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.455</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Angles (˚)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.5(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)-W(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157.0(6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.9(7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)-W(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.6(7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.5(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5(4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.3(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.3(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(10)-Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.8(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(11)-Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.4(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(1)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.8(5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.2(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.1(5)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>13.720(3) &#197;, c = 17.362(3) &#197;, α = 89.776(4), β = 82.439(5)˚, γ = 84.986(5), V = 3112.5(11) &#197;<sup>3</sup>, Z = 2, D<sub>c</sub> = 3.775 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, μ (Mo Kα) = 248.425 cm<sup>−1</sup>, R<sub>1</sub> = 0.0742 [I &gt; 2σ (I)], wR<sub>2</sub> = 0.2076 (for all data). GOF = 0.996 [29787 total reflections and 13856 unique reflections where I &gt; 2σ (I)]. CCDC No. 1472522. The molecular structure and unit cell packings of TMA-P-Pt are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S3 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S4.</p><p>Crystal data for [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・13H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Si-Pt) (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n): C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>86</sub>N<sub>8</sub>Pt<sub>2</sub>O<sub>52</sub>Si<sub>1</sub>W<sub>11</sub>; M = 3663.49, monoclinic, space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/n (#14), a = 13.4189(16) &#197;, b = 24.808(3) &#197;, c = 22.351(3) &#197;, β = 105,820(3)˚, V = 7158.7(16) &#197;<sup>3</sup>, Z = 4, D<sub>c</sub> = 3.399 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, μ (Mo Kα) = 216.063 cm<sup>−1</sup>, R<sub>1</sub> = 0.0620 [I &gt; 2σ (I)], wR<sub>2</sub> = 0.1822 (for all data). GOF = 0.901 [68797 total reflections and 16430 unique reflections where I &gt; 2σ(I)]. CCDC No. 1472524. The molecular structure and unit cell packings of TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n) are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S5 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S6.</p><p>Crystal data for [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・13H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Si-Pt) (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c): C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>86</sub>N<sub>8</sub>Pt<sub>2</sub>O<sub>52</sub>Si<sub>1</sub>W<sub>11</sub>; M = 3663.49, monoclinic, space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/c (#14), a =</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S5</label><caption><title> Selected bond lengths (&#197;) and angles (˚) around the platinum centers of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lengths (&#197;)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.023(13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.743(17)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.040(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.746(14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.030(17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.700(2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.060(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.680(2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.717</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.000(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.900(2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.040(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(2)-O(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.950(19)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.030(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.923(19)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.040(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(6)-O(19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.950(2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.931</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)&#215;&#215;&#215;Pt(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.300</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Angles (˚)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(5)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.7(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(3)-W(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.3(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(1)-O(10)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155.4(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pt(2)-O(11)-W(5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.2(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-O(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.2(7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-O(11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.1(8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(5)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.6(8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.1(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(10)-Pt(1)-N(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.7(9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(11)-Pt(2)-N(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.7(10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(1)-Pt(1)-N(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.2(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N(3)-Pt(2)-N(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.9(11)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(1)-O(4)-W(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.3(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W(5)-O(19)-W(6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.0(9)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig17"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S13</label><caption><title> FTIR spectra in the polyoxoanion region (1800 - 400 cm<sup>−1</sup>), measured as KBr disks, of (a) TMA-Si-Pt and (b) K<sub>8</sub>[SiW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・17H<sub>2</sub>O</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x20.png"/></fig><fig id="fig18"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S14</label><caption><title> FTIR spectra in the polyoxoanion region (1800 - 400 cm<sup>−1</sup>), measured as KBr disks, of (a) TMA-Ge-Pt and (b) K<sub>6</sub>Na<sub>2</sub>[GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>]・12H<sub>2</sub>O</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x21.png"/></fig><fig id="fig19"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S15</label><caption><title><sup>1</sup>H NMR spectrum in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub> of TMA-Si-Pt. The spectrum was referenced to an internal standard of DSS</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x22.png"/></fig><fig id="fig20"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S16</label><caption><title><sup>1</sup>H NMR spectrum in DMSO-d<sub>6</sub> of TMA-Ge-Pt. The spectrum was referenced to an internal standard of DSS</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x23.png"/></fig><fig id="fig21"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S17</label><caption><title>UV-Vis spectrum of TMA-Si-Pt in H<sub>2</sub>O in the range of 280 - 800 nm (7.23 &#180; 10<sup>−5</sup> M). Inset: in the range of 300 - 800 nm</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x24.png"/></fig><fig id="fig22"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S18</label><caption><title>UV-Vis spectrum of TMA-Ge-Pt in H<sub>2</sub>O in the range of 280 - 800 nm (7.23 &#180; 10<sup>−5</sup> M). Inset: in the range of 300 - 800 nm</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x25.png"/></fig><p>13.4261(10) &#197;, b = 24.8114(17) &#197;, c = 22.8205(15) &#197;, β = 106.679(4)˚, V = 7282.1(9) &#197;<sup>3</sup>, Z = 4, D<sub>c</sub> = 3.341 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, μ (Mo Kα) = 212.402 cm<sup>−1</sup>, R<sub>1</sub> = 0.0542 [I &gt; 2σ (I)], wR<sub>2</sub> = 0.0979 (for all data). GOF = 0.921 [68063 total reflections and 16679 unique reflections where I &gt; 2σ(I)]. CCDC No. 1472523. The molecular structure and unit cell packings of TMA-Si-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c) are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S7 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S8.</p><fig id="fig23"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S19</label><caption><title>Time course for hydrogen evolution from aqueous TEA solution under visible light irradiation. Reaction conditions: TMA-P-Pt (○), TMA-Si-Pt (△), and TMA-Ge-Pt (□) (1.0 μmol of Pt), EY (2.5 μmol), K-Si-Al (2.5 μmol), TiO<sub>2</sub> (anatase : rutile = 80:20) 50 mg, 100 mM TEA aqueous solution (10 mL, pH 7), light irradiation at ≥400 nm at 25˚C</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2530146x26.png"/></fig><p>Crystal data for [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・11H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt) (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n): C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>82</sub>N<sub>8</sub>Pt<sub>2</sub>O<sub>50</sub>Ge<sub>1</sub>W<sub>11</sub>; M = 3671.97, monoclinic, space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/n (#14), a = 12.917(2) &#197;, b = 25.826(4) &#197;, c = 20.431(2) &#197;, β = 100.515(3)˚, V = 6701.1 (18) &#197;<sup>3</sup>, Z = 4, D<sub>c</sub> = 3.639 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, μ (Mo Kα) = 234.995 cm<sup>−1</sup>, R<sub>1</sub> = 0.0605 [I &gt; 2σ (I)], wR<sub>2</sub> = 0.1353 (for all data). GOF = 1.162 [109879 total reflections and 15397 unique reflections where I &gt; 2σ (I)]. CCDC No. 1472526. The molecular structure and unit cell packings of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/n) are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S9 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S10.</p><p>Crystal data for [(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub>N]<sub>4</sub>[α-GeW<sub>11</sub>O<sub>39</sub>{cis-Pt(NH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>]・11H<sub>2</sub>O (TMA-Ge-Pt) (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c): C<sub>16</sub>H<sub>82</sub>N<sub>8</sub>Pt<sub>2</sub>O<sub>50</sub>Ge<sub>1</sub>W<sub>11</sub>; M = 3671.97, monoclinic, space group: P2<sub>1</sub>/c (#14), a = 13.4248(13) &#197;, b = 24.909(2) &#197;, c = 22.767(3) &#197;, β = 106.708(6)˚, V = 7291.7(12) &#197;<sup>3</sup>, Z = 4, D<sub>c</sub> = 3.345 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, μ (Mo Kα) = 215.962 cm<sup>−1</sup>, R<sub>1</sub> = 0.0876 [I &gt; 2σ (I)], wR<sub>2</sub> = 0.2403 (for all data). GOF = 1.113 [68383 total reflections and 16705 unique reflections where I &gt; 2σ (I)]. CCDC No. 1472525. The molecular structure and unit cell packings of TMA-Ge-Pt (space group P2<sub>1</sub>/c) are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S11 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>S12.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.70890-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abe, R. (2010) Recent Progress on Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting under Visible Light Irradiation. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, 11, 179-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maeda, K. and Domen, K. (2010) Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 1, 2655-2661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz1007966</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hisatomi, T., Kubota, J. and Domen, K. (2014) Recent Advances in Semiconductors for Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Chemical Society Reviews, 43, 7520-7535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60378D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, J., Wang, D., Han, H. and Li, C. (2013) Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research, 46, 1900-1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar300227e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kato, M. and Kato, C.N. (2011) A Keggin-Type Polyoxotungstate-Coordinated Diplatinum(II) Complex: Synthesis, Characterization, and Stability of the Cis-Platinum(II) Moieties in Dimethylsulfoxide and Water. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 14, 982-985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2011.03.049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kato, C.N., Morii, Y., Hattori, S., Nakayama, R., Makino, Y. and Uno, H. (2012) Diplatinum(II)-Coordinated Polyoxotungstate: Synthesis, Molecular Structure, and Photocatalytic Performance for Hydrogen Evolution from Water under Visible-Light Irradiation. Dalton Transactions, 41, 10021-10027.http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2dt30915g</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hattori, S., Ihara, Y. and Kato, C.N. (2015) A Novel Photocatalytic System Constructed Using Eosin Y, Titanium Dioxide, and Keggin-Type Platinum(II)- and Aluminum(III)-Coordinated Polyoxotungstates for Hydrogen Production from Water Under Visible Light Irradiation. Catalysis Letters, 145, 1703-1709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10562-015-1574-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, N. and Lu, G. (2009) Photo-Catalytic H2 Evolution over a Series of Keggin-Structure Heteropoly Blue Sensitized Pt/TiO2 under Visible Light Irradiation. Applied Surface Science, 255, 4378-4383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.11.056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nie, Y., Chen, W., Liu, Z. and Wang, E. (2015) Synthesis and Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Activity of Three Keggin-Type Polyoxometalates with Different Central Atoms. Inorg. Chemical Communications, 61, 184-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2015.09.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tézé, A. and Hervé, G. (1977) Formation et isomerisation des undeca et dodeca tungstosilicates et germanates isomeres. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, 39, 999-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(77)80251-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haraguchi, N., Okaue, Y., Isobe, T. and Matsuda, Y. (1994) Stabilization of Tetravalent Cerium upon Coordination of Unsaturated Heteropolytungstate Anions. Inorganic Chemistry, 33, 1015-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic00084a008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A Short History of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0108767307043930</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spek, A.L. (2009) Structure Validation in Chemical Crystallography. Acta Crystallographica, D65, 148-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S090744490804362X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, X., Li, Y., Peng S., Lu, G. and Li, S. (2012) Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution under Visible Light Irradiation by the Polyoxometalate α-[AlSiW11(H2O)O39]5--Eosin Y System. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 12150-12157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimura, K., Miwa, T. and Imamura, M. (1970) Radiolysis and Photolysis of Methanolic Solutions of Eosin. I. The γ-Radiolysis of Neutral and Alkaline Solutions. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 43, 1329-1336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.43.1329</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Papaconstantinou, E. (1989) Photochemistry of Polyoxometalates of Molybdenum and Tungsten and/or Vanadium. Chemical Society Reviews, 18, 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/cs9891800001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70890-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sadakane M. and Steckhan E. (1998) Electrochemical Properties of Polyoxometalates as Electrocatalysts. Chemical Reviews, 98, 219-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr960403a</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>