<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Health</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Health</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1949-4998</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/health.2016.812121</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">Health-70342</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Simulation Model for the Risk of Fetal Exposure Originated by the Zika Virus (VIZK)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dalia</surname><given-names>M. Muñoz Pizza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anibal</surname><given-names>Muñoz Loaiza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oscar</surname><given-names>A. Manrique Arias</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vanessa</surname><given-names>Abello Sossa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carlos</surname><given-names>A. Abello Muñoz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Steven</surname><given-names>Raigosa Osorio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hans</surname><given-names>Meyer Contreras</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>John</surname><given-names>F. Arredondo Montoya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gonzaga</surname><given-names>Ospina Patiño</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Irma</surname><given-names>Pérez Contreras</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>E. Cardenas Perea</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Miguel</surname><given-names>A. Enríquez Guerra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jesús</surname><given-names>A. Valdez García</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Grupo de Modelación Matemática en Epidemiología (GMME), Facultad de Educación, Universidad del Quindío, Quindío, Colombia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Facultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>08</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1178</fpage><lpage>1186</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>30,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>September</day>	<month>2,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  It is set and analyzed a simulation model based on non-linear ordinary differential equations to interpret the dynamics of the microcephaly incidence caused by the Zika virus in a risk group of pregnant women. This one is induced by a population of men in a reproductive age. Also, some parameters of the model were estimated for an average temperature of 23℃ and by using the adjusted functions from references [1] [2]. All system simulations were done with the Maple software and parameters values obtained from several sources (estimated, hypothetic, and form literature). It has been found that the application of contraceptive measures impacts the population of sexually active women. As result, the exposure to congenital abnormalities increases, particularly, microcephaly.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Model</kwd><kwd> Microcephaly</kwd><kwd> Zika Virus</kwd><kwd> Basic Reproduction Number</kwd><kwd> Risk Group</kwd><kwd>  Incidence</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Zika virus (ZIKV) is transmitted by mosquitoes of the Flaviviridae family of the Flavivirus gender. These ones are pretty close to the ones that transmit encephalitis, yellow fever, dengue, and virus del Nilo. It was isolated in 1947 from blood of the Rhesus monkey (Macacamulatta) that it was feverish during a study of the yellow fever at the Zika forest in Uganda [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref3">3</xref>] . Later on, the virus was isolated from an Aedes africanus mosquitoes group in 1948 at the same region of the Zika jungle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref4">4</xref>] . The natural cycle of ZIKV implies mosquitoes principally from the genders: Aedes, Aedes furcifer, Aedes taylori, Aedes luteocephalus, and Aedes aegypti. The last one is considered the main vector for virus transmission [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref7">7</xref>] . ZIKV is transmitted by the infected mosquitoes bite maintaining a zoonotic cycle (disease transmission from animals to humans). In this transmission cycle, humans serve as accidental hosts, however, in areas without primates the humans take the role of primary amplifiers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref8">8</xref>] . It is suspected that ZIKV uses the primates as principal agents for their reproduction and transmission. Antibodies were detected in other animal species, including: buffaloes, elephants, goats, and hippopotamus among others. This fact suggests the possibility of multi-species transmission. Furthermore, there exists evidence of sexual transmission in humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>ZIKV infection variates in humans, the most common symptoms are: flu, headache, anorexia, eye ache, general discomfort, myalgia, arthralgia, asthenia, edema and diarrhea, that is to say, the symptomatology is unspecific. All this clinical picture may be confused with the other existent diseases, particularly with the most frequent ones, Dengue and Chikungunya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref12">12</xref>] . Even some people could be asymptomatic to this disease.</p><p>The ZIKV introduces questions about the possible role of the infection with the microcephaly; actually there are only ecological evidences. Microcephaly is defined as the presence of a cranial perimeter less than a couple of standard deviations for the average age, sex, and gestational age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref14">14</xref>] . Investigations suggest an increase in the microcephaly in some states where ZIKV was detected, indicating a possible association between events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref13">13</xref>] . The maternal-fetal transmission has been demonstrated in several infections as, Dengue and Nilo fever. Also, this disease may cause premature delivery, birth defects and microcephaly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In the last years it has been observed an increase in the infectious diseases, this is due to the known symptoms as well as the reemerging ones that have appeared with a high incidence because of social, economic and health factors. Such is the case of ZIKV, an endemic virus in some countries of Africa and Asia that has been expanded to other zones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref8">8</xref>] . From these facts emerges the importance of mathematical models on the risk of exposition to the ZIKV.</p><p>Recently, some reports treating this issue have appeared. Daozhou et al. (2016), have analyzed a mathematical model for the prevention and control of Zika, including the vectorial and sexual transmission, with data of epidemic outbreaks of Brazil, Colombia and the Salvador. From those studies they conclude that the R<sub>0</sub> is more sensitive to the bite rate and the natural death rate of the mosquitoes as well as the sexual transmission increases the risk of infection, the epidemic size and extends the outbreak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref15">15</xref>] . Nishiura et al. (2016), have estimated the R<sub>0</sub> of the ZIKV infection, as an indicator of potential transmission, using data from the South Pacific region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref16">16</xref>] . On the other hand, Mu&#241;oz et al. (2016) have formulated and analyzed a mathematical model to treat the risk of microcephaly incidence caused by the ZIKV in a pregnant women group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>The model proposed in this paper helps to provide information that may help to elaborate effective control strategies, potential scenarios and transmission mechanisms of the virus.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Model</title><p>It is proposed a simulation model based in non-linear ordinary differential equations to describe the dynamics of pregnant women that are susceptible to get infected by ZIKV and may present fetal microcephaly induced by this virus. The variables of the model are described in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and the parameters in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Variables and initial populations of the model</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial populations</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The susceptible and sexually active women’s population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The susceptible pregnant women’s population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZIKV positive pregnant women’s population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infected pregnant women with no development of microcephaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infected women’s population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Susceptible and sexually active men’s population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZIKV positive men’s population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The non-carrier Aedes aegypti mosquitoes population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The virus-carrier Aedes aegypti mosquitoes population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total population (men + women)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total population of sexually active women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total population of sexually active men</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total population of mosquitoes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Parameters of the simulation model</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Estimated/hypothetic value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The fraction of women that get into the sexually active population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Men’s fraction that get into the sexually active population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The natural mortality rate of persons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infected pregnant women’s fraction that are not developing microcephaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infected pregnant women’s fraction that develops microcephaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Developing rate of the infection in the pregnant women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transmission probability to the susceptible women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7913</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Probability of pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The infected women recovery rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fraction of women that use contraceptive measures</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3, 0.6, 0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transmission probability to the susceptible men</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7913</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transmission probability to the non-carrier mosquitoes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6, 0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Death rate of the mosquitoes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the flux diagrams of the Figures 1-3, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The dynamic system in the sexually active women that get pregnant, susceptible to ZIKV as well as exposed to microcephaly are (according to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula7"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula8"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula9"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula10"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula11"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The dynamics of the pregnant women population</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x51.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The dynamics of the sexually active men’s population</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x52.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Dynamics of the Aedes aegypti mosquitoes population</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x53.png"/></fig><p>In this system <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> indicates the variation of each women population in time, these variations are defined as inflows minus outflows. The equations corresponding to the dynamics of the sexually active men that get infected by the virus-carrier mosquito bite are (according <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula12"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula13"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From these equations (6) and (7)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, are the variations of each men’s population in time, and are the result of inflows minus outflows. Finally, the equations belonging to the infectious process in the non-carrier and virus-carrier mosquitoes are (as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula14"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula15"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In a similar way, Equations (8) and (9) are result of inflows and outflows.</p><p>The variation in time of each total population <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined by the following differential equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula16"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As well,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula17"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Varying with respect to t, it is obtained</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula18"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the case of mosquitoes,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula19"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Varying in function of t,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula20"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From the dynamic systems, replacing the equations (1)-(7) in (10)-(13), it is obtained the dynamic system of the populations,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula21"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula22"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula23"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.70342-formula24"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Simulations and Results</title><p>The dynamic systems (1)-(5), (6)-(9) were simulated using the Maple software, with the values of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> it is indicated that with an 80% of women under contraceptive protection, the populations of susceptible pregnant women, the infected ones and men infected with ZIKV tend to stabilize in an average time of 40 days. These populations have a maximum point in an average of 10 days and having a lower number of infections through time. Moreover, the infected pregnant women with no microcephaly present a significant increase and tend to rise slowly through the time. This can be explained through a recent report by Cauchemez et al. (2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70342-ref18">18</xref>] where they have estimated that the risk of microcephaly increase approximately 1\% when the pregnant women are infected by ZIKV in the first trimester. According to this fact, it is possible to corroborate the increase of infected women that do not develop microcephaly, associating the ZIKV with a low fetal risk. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> depicts different levels of h (women’s</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Behavior of the susceptible pregnant women, infected pregnant women, infected women without microcephaly development, and ZIKV infected men</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x72.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The susceptible x<sub>2</sub> and infected x<sub>3</sub> pregnant women’s behavior.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x73.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x74.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Infected pregnant women that do not develop microcephaly</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x75.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> ZIKV infected men’s population</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x76.png"/></fig><p>fraction under contraceptive protection). The behavior of the susceptible pregnant women population rise showing a maximum point that is each time smaller as h increases, namely, with the contraceptive measures, the susceptible women population decreases. A similar behavior is presented by the infected pregnant women. Both populations tend to stabilize in an average of 35 days.</p><p>The pregnant women’s population that develops microcephaly have a quick growth till almost 25 days, after that, the population tends to have a linear-like growth through time as h increases. However, this population has a maximum point when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-8203762x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows that the infected men’s population rises quickly in an average of 10 days, after 20 days decreases and tends to stabilize. This population does not change through time when the fraction of women that are under contraceptive treatments rises.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The behavior of the simulations shows that the susceptible pregnant women’s population is sensitive to the women’s fraction under birth control. This is an expected result if we account for an 80% of this fraction, were the susceptible women, infected pregnant women and women without microcephaly development population’s decrease. With this model it is possible to make predictions and analysis to design more effective strategies in the future.</p><p>ZIKV has a little known natural history, then, it is primordial to generate new mathematical studies to gain a better understanding of this disease and propose effective control strategies.</p><p>The proposed model in this paper can be applied (with the respective adjustments) in the study of other viral infections transmitted by vectors that generate risk of other pathological complications.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>AML thanks to Grupo de Modelaci&#243;n Matem&#225;tica en Epidemiolog&#237;a (GMME), Facu- ltad de Educaci&#243;n\’on, Universidad del Quind&#237;o-Colombia.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pizza, D.M.M., Loaiza, A.M., Arias, O.A.M., Sossa, V.A., Mu&#241;oz, C.A.A., Osorio, S.R., Contreras, H.M., Montoya, J.F.A., Pati&#241;o, G.O., Contreras, I.P., Perea, M.E.C., Guerra, M.A.E. and Garc&#237;a, J.A.V. (2016) A Simulation Model for the Risk of Fetal Exposure Originated by the Zika Virus (VIZK). Health, 8, 1178-1186. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/health.2016.812121</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.70342-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu-Helmersson, J., Stenlund, H., Wilder-Smith, A. and Rocklov, J. (2014) Vectorial Capacity of Aedes aegypti: Effects of Temperature and Implications for Global Dengue Epidemic Potential. PLOS ONE, 9, e89783.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Polwiang, S. (2015) The Seasonal Reproduction Number of Dengue Fever: Impacts of Climate to Transmission. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Silpakorn University, Thailandia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dick, G.W., Cocina, S.F. and Haddow, A.J. (1952) Zika aislamientos de virus y especificidad serológica. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 46, 509-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(52)90042-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dick, G.W. (1952) Patogenicidad del virus y propiedades fisicas Zika. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 46, 521-534.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(52)90043-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haddow, A.D., Schuh, A.J., Yasuda, C.Y., Kasper, M.R., Fleang, V., FHuy, R., Guzman, F.I., Tesh, R.B. and Weaver, S.C. (2012) Genetic Characterization of Zika Virus Strains: Geographic Expansion of the Asian Lineage. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 6, e1477.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faye, O., Faye, O., Diallo, D., Diallo, M., Weidmann, M. and Sail, A.A. (2013) Quantitative Real-Time PCR Detection of Zika Virus and Evaluation with Field-Caught Mosquitoes. Virology Journal, 10, 311.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baronti, C., Piorkowski, G., Charrel, R.N., Boubis, L., Leparc-Goffart, I. and de Lamballerie, X. (2014) Complete coding sequence of zika virus from a French Polynesia outbreak in 2013. Genome Announcements, 2, pii: e00500-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cabrera Pérez, Z. (2014) Epidemiologia del virus Zika. Universidad Veracruzana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heang, V., Yasuda, C.Y., Sovann, L., Haddow, A.D., Travassos da Rosa, A.P., Tesh, R.B., et al. (2012) Zika Virus Infection, Cambodia, 2010. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 18, 1-3.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1802.111224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kwong, J.C., Druce, J.D. and Leder, K. (2013) Zika Virus Infection Acquired during Brief Travel to Indonesia. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 89, 516-517.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pouliot, S.H., Xiong, X., Harville, E., Paz-Soldan, V., Tomashek, K.M., Breart, G., et al. (2010) Maternal Dengue and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Obstetrical &amp; Gynecological Survey, 65, 107-118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, P.S., Li, M.Z., Chong, C.S., Ng, L.C. and Tan, C.H. (2013) Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse): A Potential Vector of Zika Virus in Singapore. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 7, e2348.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2015) Rapid Risk Assessment: Microcephalyin Brazil Potentially Linked to the Zika Virus Epidemic, 24 November 2015. ECDC, Stock-holm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Penas, J.J. and And\'ujar, F.R. (2003) Alteraciones del perímetro craneal: Microcefalia y macrocefalia. Pediatr Integral, 7, 587-600.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daozhou, G., Yijun, L., Daihai, H., Travis, C.P., Yangk, K., Gerardo, Ch. and Shigui, R. (2016) Prevention and Control of Zika as a Mosquito-Borne and Sexually Transmitted  Disease: A Mathematical Modelling Analysis. Scientific Reports, 6, 28070.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishiura, H., Kinoshita, R., Mizumoto, K., Yasuda, Y. and Nah, K. (2016) Transmission Potential of Zika Virus Infection in the South Pacific. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 45, 95-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.02.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pizza, D.M.M., Loaiza, A.M., Montoya, J.F.A., Manrique, O.A., Sossa, V.A., Munoz, C.A.A., Raigosa, S.,Contreras, H.M., Contreras, I.P., Perea, M.E.C. and Enríquez, M.A. (2016) A Model for the Risk of Microcephaly Induced by the Zika Virus (ZIKV). Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 4, 109-117.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojmsi.2016.43010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70342-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cauchemez, S., Besnard, M., Bompard, P., Dub, T., Guillemette-Artur, P., Eyrolle-Guignot, D., Salje, H., Van Kerkhove, M.D., Abadie, V., Garel, C., Fontanet, A. and Mallet, H.-P. (2016) Association between Zika Virus and Microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013-15: A Retrospective Study. The Lancet, 387, 2125-2132.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00651-6</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>