<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2016.712138</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-70132</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Investigation Capability of Plasma Focus Device for &lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;N Radioisotope Production by Means of Deuteron Experimental Spectrum
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maryam</surname><given-names>Saed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahmud</surname><given-names>Vahdat Roshan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayoub</surname><given-names>Banoushi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morteza</surname><given-names>Habibi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>AmirKabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Research Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology of Iran, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Islamic Azad University Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>08</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1512</fpage><lpage>1518</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>23</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Optimal condition for 
  <sup>13</sup>N radioisotope production through 
  <sup>12</sup>C (d,n) 13N within plasma focus device is investigated. As the deuteron spectrum follows the empirical power law of the form 
  E<sup>-m</sup>, it is shown that the activity decreases by increasing the value of 
  m. Unlike the fact that the repetition rate increases the activity, it is possible to achieve higher activities by increasing the bombardment time at a fixed repetition rate.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Positron Emission Tomography (PET)</kwd><kwd> Plasma Focus</kwd><kwd> Deuteron Spectrum</kwd><kwd> Activation</kwd><kwd> Repetition Rate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Short-lived radioisotopes (SLR) such as <sup>11</sup>C, <sup>13</sup>N, <sup>15</sup>O, <sup>18</sup>F usually have medical applications, particularly in positron emission tomography (PET). These radioisotopes are obtained through bombarding appropriate targets by ion beams produced in accelerators. Due to the short half-life of such radioisotopes, which is one of the advantages of this method over others, they must be produced in a place where they are expected to be used. To this end, accelerators have to be used in hospitals. PET radioisotopes production by means of cyclotron is an expensive method, therefore it is suitable to consider pulsed plasma devices to produce PET radioisotope.</p><p>Plasma focus devices are one of the appropriate systems in producing short lived radioisotopes because they are low cost and easy to use and maintain.</p><p>As a switch is closed in a plasma focus device, a voltage of several tens kV is quickly applied to the electrodes. Due to gas electrical breakdown, free electrons move toward the insulation surface, afterward a current layer is formed. Because of the effect of Lorentz force (J &#215; B) on the current layer, the layer is ac- celerated towards the end of electrodes at a high speed. By the radial Lorentz force, a part of the current layer symmetrically moves towards the center of anode and a very short-lived, dense, hot plasma column is formed which is the source of ion, electron, X-ray and neutron production.</p><p>The voltage of capacitor bank for a plasma focus device is usually 10 - 30 kV, but the results of a lot of experiments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref1">1</xref>] have shown that deuteron beams emitted from the pinch have a wide range of energy (up to several MeV). Ion acceleration with such high energy is one of the most unexpected aspects of the plasma focus device. Several models have been suggested for acceleration of ions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref1">1</xref>] such as instabilities, anomalous resistivity, plasma wave, and shock wave. However, the ion acceleration mechanism in the plasma focus pinch is not understood well. The most important factor in ions acceleration is the m = 0 instability (sausage instability). This instability is often attributed to the acceleration of ions at high energy. The growth of such instabilities is due to radially symmetric disturbances in certain points. At these points, the cross sectional area is reduced, and then azimuthal magnetic field strength at the surface of the plasma will be extended. The magnetic pressure will be increased. As a result, the plasma column at these points compared to other pointsconstricts at a faster rate. Rapid changes of magnetic field at each constriction induce a large longitudinal electric field that accelerates ions within the plasma column at higher energies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>A good candidate for studying radioisotope production within the plasma focus is the nuclear reaction of <sup>12</sup>C (d,n) <sup>13</sup>N. The advantages of this reaction are high cross section, low threshold energy, short half-life, and the availability of target materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Through bombarding the graphite target by high energy deuterons, Nitrogen-13 is produced via the following reaction:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70132-formula311"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The threshold energy of this reaction is 328 keV. Nitrogen13 is a SLR and it decays with the half-life of 9.96 minutes and produces a positron (b+). The positrons are stopped in the graphite (positron speed is slowed down) and is annihilated with an electron. Two oppositely directed 511 keV gamma-rays are produced by the annihi- lation of every electron- positron pair.</p><p>Radioisotope production within plasma focus has been taken into consideration for a long time. Brzosko group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref4">4</xref>] in the U.S., Angeli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref5">5</xref>] in Italy, Roshan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] in Singapore can be named. The amount of activity produced in Singapore group has remarkably increased. Roshan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] have carried out their experiments on a plasma focus device NX2. They placed the target graphite <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to a distance of 100 mm in front of deuteron beam within NX2 device so that the solid angle between deuterons and target graphite was<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The activity reported by Roshan et al. within NX2 device with repetition rate of 1 Hz after 30 seconds of graphite bombardment was equal to 5.2 kBq [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] . This amount in this small device (1.7 kJ) is better than the reported activity of bigger devices. However, it is not very important for medical applications.</p><p>In this study, first the activity of a set of experimental spectra of deuteron produced by NX2 plasma focus device which has been measured by magnetic spectrometer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref7">7</xref>] is calculated and then the optimizing conditions of <sup>13</sup>N production is investigated.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. <sup>13</sup>N Activity Calculation Phases</title><p>Thick target yield shows the reaction probability or reaction rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70132-formula312"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where N is the number of nitrogen 13 nuclei per cubic centimeter; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the cross section of reaction <sup>12</sup>C</p><p>(d,n) <sup>13</sup>N; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is stopping power of deuterons on graphite target, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the incident energy of deuterons.</p><p>The data of cross section of the reaction <sup>12</sup>C (d,n) <sup>13</sup>N is obtained from EXFOR data base [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref8">8</xref>] and SRIM code [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref9">9</xref>] is used to calculate reaction stopping power (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the blue points are experimental data</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Deuteron stopping power in the graphite target</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x13.png"/></fig><p>(by means SRIM code) and the red curve is the fitted diagram on experimental data.</p><p>The total number of activated nitrogen 13 nuclei in the target estimated from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70132-formula313"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the conducted experiments, deuteron spectrum follows the empirical power law of the form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref11">11</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70132-formula314"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this paper, we fit the generated deuteron spectra in plasma focus device NX2 (1.7 kJ energy) by Equation (3). One of deuteron spectra has been given as an instance in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. We have fitted this deuteron spectrum by the exponential function in Equation (3) and it fits with Equation (4) spectrum. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the blue points are experimental data and the red curve is the fitted diagram according to Equation (4) on experimental data.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70132-formula315"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The number of <sup>13</sup>N nuclei can be calculated by replacing Equation (4) in Formula 2. Then, the activity is calculated.</p><p><sup>13</sup>N activity, resulting from deuteron collision (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) to graphite target has been calculated, A = 0.616 kBq.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Investigation Capability of Plasma Focus Device for <sup>13</sup>N Radioisotope Production</title><p><sup>13</sup>N radioisotope is achieved based on <sup>12</sup>C(d,n) <sup>13</sup>N process. The amount of <sup>13</sup>N activity is dependent on the whole deuteron spectrum descended upon <sup>12</sup>C solid target. As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, deuteron energy spectrum</p><p>follows the power law<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, with the investigations conducted on three sets of deuteron spectra</p><p>(within pressures of 4, 6, 8 mbar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref7">7</xref>] ), we realized that the number of incident deuterons and the energy of these</p><p>deuterons will be reduced with an increase of the amount of m in the exponential function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> depicts m changes based on maximum energy of deuterons spectra. As it is clear in the figure, the energy of these deuterons will be reduced with an increase of the amount of m and with the calculation of <sup>13</sup>N activity (as a consequence of the collision of these deuteron spectra with <sup>12</sup>C target) it was found that in the spectra with higher m, we would have less activity.</p><p>Moreover, the investigation of experimental spectra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref7">7</xref>] shows that as the number of incident deuterons increase, the value of m decreases and the activity increases.</p><p>For a better description of deuterons dependence on <sup>13</sup>N activity, we have calculated the number of <sup>13</sup>N nuclei</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Spectrum of deuteron produced in NX2 plasma focus device [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref7">7</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x19.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Maximum energy of experimental spectra of deuteron and its corresponding m</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x20.png"/></fig><p>for three series of deuteron spectra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The relationship between m and A is obtained from the following formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70132-formula316"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the number of deuterons ejected from the pinch in a solid angle<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In order to consider the probability of collision between all deuterons and graphite target, the value of the angle was chosen to be 80<sup>o</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref12">12</xref>] , <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the solid angle subtended by the target of graphite.</p><p>In order to calculate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the same laboratory conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] , (a graphite target with dimensions (15 &#215; 15 &#215; 0.7) 100 mm away from the pinch) are considered. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows activity changes in terms of m (exponential function power in Equation (3)). As is apparent from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and it was mentioned earlier, deuteron spectra with less m value as a consequence of the collision with <sup>12</sup>C target would have produced more <sup>13</sup>N nuclei. Therefore, the activity will increase.</p><p>Device energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref14">14</xref>] and repetition rate are factors affecting the rate of activity. As the device energy and the repetition rate increases, the number of incident deuterons will increase as well. Consequently, the rate of</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between m and A</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x26.png"/></fig><p>activity will increase remarkably.</p><p>In this research, for optimizing Nitrogen 13 radioisotope, the repetition rate is selected as an influential factor in increasing activity.</p><p>The activity after k successive shot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref15">15</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70132-formula317"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The effect of repetition rate on the amount of activity at frequencies of 1 Hz, 5 Hz, 10 Hz and 16 Hz during the bombardment time of 30 s (the time considered in the lab [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref6">6</xref>] ), 300 s (1/2 of radioisotope half-life), 600 s (1 half-life), 1200 s (2 half-life) 1800 s (3 half-life) is investigated and its diagram is drawn.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, as the repetition rate increases, the activity will also increase in such a way that at repetition rate of 1 Hz after one half-life (600 s), target bombardment is 0.2 MBq, while at the same bom- bardment time (one half-life) the activity at repetition rate of 16 Hz is 4 MBq. As a result, repetition rate is a very effective factor in increasing the activity.</p><p>The required activity for PET is more than 1 GBq. The calculated activity for one of the experimental spectra of deuteron at repetition rate of 16 Hz and bombardment time of 600 s (A<sub>cal</sub> = 8 MBq) is less than the required activity for imaging. In order to investigate the ability of plasma focus device for producing the required activity for imaging, by increasing the repetition rate, the activity is calculated at higher frequencies. Therefore, activity at frequencies of 50 Hz, 100 Hz, 500 Hz, and 1 kHz was examined. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, activity at repetition rate of 1 kHz after 1800 s is 0.9 GBq. Due to technical restrictions within the available plasma focus devices, achieving such a high repetition rate is difficult. For this reason, instead of increasing the repetition rate, we can increase the bombardment time at a fixed repetition rate. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the activity at a fixed repetition rate with different bombardment time.</p><p>The activity could be increased by increasing the device energy, too [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70132-ref13">13</xref>] . It was shown that there is a linear relationship between device energy and the activity. In order to reach to the required activity for PET imaging, the plasma focus energy should be in the order of kilo joules.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>A series of experimental deuteron spectra was used to show that the activity is highly dependent on the power of m in the empirical power law distribution of the deuterons. By decreasing the value of m, the energy and the number of incident deuterons will increase which will lead to the increment of the activity. Since the repetition rate of the device is a straight forward factor for increasing the number of incident deuterons, the activity is optimized by repetition rate.</p><p>In order to produce the practical activity for PET imaging, the repetition rate should be around 1 kHz which is</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Activity in terms of repetition rate</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x28.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Activity in terms of bombardment time</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-7502803x29.png"/></fig><p>technically difficult to achieve. Therefore, the bombardment time is increased at a fixed repetition rate.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Maryam Saed,Mahmud Vahdat Roshan,Ayoub Banoushi,Morteza Habibi, (2016) The Investigation Capability of Plasma Focus Device for <sup>13</sup>N Radioisotope Production by Means of Deuteron Experimental Spectrum. Journal of Modern Physics,07,1512-1518. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.712138</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.70132-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shirani, B., Abbasi, F. and Fusion, J. (2012) Prospects for 13N Production in a Small Plasma Focus Device. Journal of Fusion Energy, 32, 235-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10894-012-9558-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, S. and Saw, S.H. (2012) Physics of Plasmas, 19, Article ID: 112703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4766744</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roshan, M.V., Razaghi, S., Asghari, F., Rawat, R.S., Springham, S.V., Lee, P., Lee, S. and Tan, T.L. (2014) Physics Letters A, 3, 78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bienkowska, B., Jednorog, S., Ivanova-Stanik, I.M., Scholz, M. and Szydlowski, A. (2004) Acta Physica Slovaca, 54, 401-407.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sadowski, M., Ese, M., Moroso, R. and Pouzo, J. (2000) Nukleonika, 45, 179-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sadowski, M., Szydlowski, A., Scholz, M., Kelly, H., Marquez, A. and Lepone, A. (1999) Radiation Measurements, 31, 185-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00083-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ziegler, J.F. (2013) SRIM—The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter. http://www.srim.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zerkin, V. (2014) Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data (EXFOR). https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/exfor.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roshan, M.V., Springham, S.V., Talebitaher, A., Rawat, R.S. and Lee, P. (2010) Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 52, Article ID: 085007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/52/8/085007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roshan, M.V., Springham, S.V., Rawat, R.S. and Lee, P. (2010) IEEE Transactions on Plasma Sciences, 38, 3393-3397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2010.2083699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Angeli, E., Tartaria, A., Frignanic, M., Mostaccib, D., Rocchic, F. and Sumini, M. (2005) Nuclear Technology &amp; Radiation Protection, 1, 33-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brzosko, J.S., Melzacki, K., Powell, C. and Gai, M. (2001) Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry. Sixteenth International Conference of the American Institute of Physics, 277-280.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gulickson, R.L., Pickles, W.L., Price, D.F., Salhin, H.L. and Wainwright, T.E. (1978) Ion Beam Production in the Plasma Focus. The Second International Conference on Energy Storage, Compression, and Switching, Venice, 5-8 December 1978.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kruskal, M. and Schwarzschild, M. (1954) Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 223, 348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1954.0120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70132-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernstein, M.J. and Comisar, G.G. (1972) Physics of Fluids, 15, 700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1693966</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>