The appreciation of users is essential to improve all health programs. In this 21st century, the global competition among service providers is to render qualitative services to satisfy the desires of customers [1] . The quality of care is a judgment that is made by the customer after receiving the service and comparing their expectations with the received service [2] . Most of the organizations, for improving customer’s satisfaction and, consequently, their own survival, are willing to evaluate the strategies of their service quality, and so, the customer is considered the key indicator in this evaluation [3] . Expectations are customer’s demands, meaning that what they feel a service provider must present and perceptions are customer’s experiences [4] with the service received and the difference between costumer’s expectations and perceptions is called service quality gap [5] .

Researchers of service marketing have developed nineteen service quality models during the period 1984- 2003 [6] . The service quality model “SERVQUAL” ranks as the most important of these models. By determining the gap between costumer’s perceptions and expectations of the quality of provided services, the process of service provision could be improved and costumer’s satisfaction, as a very sensitive element in today’s field of competition, could be provided [7] .

In order to determine the gap of the service quality in hospitals and health care centers, the SERVQUAL approach has been used in many studies. This service conceptual model was introduced in 1985 by Parasuraman et al. This tool measures the patients’ perceptions and expectations of services in 5 different dimensions, including physical or concrete dimensions, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy [8] . In fact, customer-cent- ered organizations set their activities based on the expectations and preferences of their customers and are to satisfy the needs and expectations of customers and considering their expectations as service quality standards is of essence [9] .

Quality in the field of health services has a special place because the critical duty and mission of protecting the health and lives of the society is the responsibility of this part and any mistake could be irreparable; on the other hand, health services are related to a vast part of the society [10] . Different studies have been conducted to evaluate customer’s satisfaction for improving the quality of provided services using SERVQUAL model in different areas from higher education [11] to health services [12] , but a little attention has been paid to evaluation of service quality in different sections of primary health care of health centers [13] , including service timely detection of cervical cancer. It is in this sense that the aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of users of the cervical cancer detection service in two health centers of a Mexican province.

In this study, 93 users from San Luis Potosí, México were selected and some of its characteristics were analyzed, which indicate, from Table 1, that most of them are between 31 and 35 (52.7%), 21.5% between 21 and 30 years and 25.8% are in the range of 36 to 40 years. in relation to level education, the highest percentage (44.1%) have baccalaureate education and the lowest (12.9%) have high school education. As for marital status, most are married (82.8%). Regarding health services they have, 76.3% it affiliated to the Mexican Social Security Institute, 19.4% to Publicly Provided Health Insurance and 4.3% to Services Institute of Social Security for State Workers.

By measuring expectations and prospects in each dimension of scale SERVQUAL model, it was found that in all averages the scores before the attention (expectations) and after this (perspectives) there is a difference statistically significant (p = 0.000). In all cases, prospects were below expectations, which it means that users expected better care that they received (Table 2).

Degree of user satisfaction by dimension (as after care) was obtained as a percentage. Intangibles (the physical aspects that the customer perceives of the organization), 53.8% of them was unsatisfied and 3.2% very satisfied. Regarding reliability (ability to develop the service as promised as agreed and accurately), 54.8% of them was satisfied and 3.2% unsatisfied. On the other hand, responsibility (willingness to help customers and provide service fast), 51.6% of them was little satisfied and anyone was very satisfied. With regard to security dimension (knowledge of employees about what they do, their courtesy and their ability to convey trust), 52.6 % of them was little satisfied and anyone was unsatisfied. In the dimension empathy (ability to provide care and personal attention to their customers), 59.1% of them was little satisfied and anyone was unsatisfied about the service. It is important to note that the satisfaction’s degree “very satisfied” never obtained the highest percentage and that the degree “satisfied” only responsibility dimension occupied the highest percentage (Figure 1).

Before receiving care users had an expectation of 192.96 points. Considering that the highest score that can be obtained by applying the scale SERVQUAL is 196 points, we can assume that the expectation was high. However, after receiving the service perspective score was 184.49 points, indicating that the care provided was not that they expected. Difference between scores was 8.47 points (p = 0.004) (Figure 2).

In this century, global competition among service providers is to provide quality care to meet the customer’s wishes. This has been increasingly important in developing countries, allowing service providers to provide greater value, competitiveness, opportunities, services growth and increased customer satisfaction. The role of service quality as a key factor in user satisfaction and organizational performance is widely recognized in developed countries [1] . Although the quality of health services has been a topic widely discussed in the literature

Source: Multidimentional SERVQUAL scale. *IMSS: Mexican Social Security Institute, *SP: Publicly Provided Health Insurance, *ISSSTE: Services Institute of Social Security for State Workers.

Source: multidimentional SERVQUAL scale. E = Expectations; P = Perspectives; D.E. = Standard deviation, D.B.A. = difference betweenthe average; L.L. = Lower Límit; U.L. = Upper limit. *Wilcoxon.

for over 40 years, its definition, interpretation and assessment rating remains controversial and complex because of the multiple factors involving construction, [17] plus it has been interpreted in different ways. The satisfaction of external users, expressing individual value judgments and subjective, is the key in the definition and assessment of quality.

This is most often used to assess the quality of care in health services and measurement indicator is expressed in levels of user satisfaction [18] . The survey for validity and reliability is the most widely accepted to measure the quality of care in multidimensional tool business services [19] . Babakus and Mangold validated a new SERVQUAL construct to hospital [19] and in Mexico were validated in 2011 in a Celaya Guanajuato hospital [15] .

The incidence of cervical cancer has decreased substantially in developed countries due to the widespread success of Pap smears programs, however, these results have not been obtained in developing countries [20] [21] . Recognizing the limited effectiveness of the program in Mexico [22] , different strategies have been implemented, but the assessment of the prospects of the users of it is very important and little or nothing has been explored, marking the aim of this research using multidimensional SERVQUAL scale. In other countries like in Iran, was studied the customer’s perceptions and expectations of primary healthcare services quality in health centers of Bandar Abbas in this paper the authors found that the majority of participants (64%) assessed the services quality moderate and that the best dimension of service quality was assurance, followed by reliability, responsiveness and tangibles with empathy being the worst [23] . In our study, users had higher expectations that perspectives on the care provided, indicating low satisfaction. Furthermore, in this study itwas found that the dimension was more dissatisfaction was tangible, which include material, equipment, facilities and staff health. About, program quality and patient safety at Children’s Hospital of Mexico “Federico Gómez”, mentions that amenities include elements such as degree of comfort achieved, hotel services provided, the information system and situation of intimacy in which the patient is attending among others. This specifies that the quality is the application of science and medical technology in a way that maximizes their health benefits without increasing proportionately their risks [24] .

Thus, in our study we found that most users are dissatisfied with the elements related to the institution, which is important for future research are analyzed factors concerning the organization and specifically concerning the service provided by nurses, the qualitative aspects and everything that influences so that patients come to perform or notPap using new indicators. Health institutions in the public sector in Mexico, nursing staff is responsible for taking the cervical smear tests and the main contact with users of the program since one of its functions, in addition to providing care, is to provide the necessary information to women so they can achieve greater attachment to the early detection program. Such personnel must hear from women attending the screening on their expectations and experiences regarding the care in order to detect areas of opportunity later to become improvement strategies that increase the quality of this priority health program. In this sense, we have identified the main problems perceived by users, which lie in long waiting periods, conditions of inadequate physical spaces, lack of respect for privacy and lack of continuous and appropriate monitoring causing dissatisfaction with the service [25] .

The authorities of public organizations have realized that their achievements as the targets are not associated with the appreciation that management makes citizens. Political discourse and theoretical approaches are not always compatible with the operation of programs that impact poorly on the reality of the people they are intended. In this context, studies seeking to approach people and understand their complex reality of incorporating multidimensional aspects, are relevant to narrowing the gap between public policy planners and those who receive benefits [26] .

On the other hand, users have certain needs or desires which sometimes are not even concerning the care and can be obtained by the organization to design and deliver a service that no longer satisfied. Some systems are available to identify the real needs of customers, while others allow only perceive the needs of which the user is aware. Both perspectives are used to improve service quality and tend to greater satisfaction of people who receive it [16] .

In conducting this study there were different limitations, including the small influx of women who demand service and large span of time (45 minutes) to do this, which meant not being able to have a larger sample.

Finally, it should be mentioned that studies as performed by this research group and characteristics that were addressed are important to improve a program, in this case the timely detection of cervical cancer. Users’ opinion of the program is critical because they are the recipients of care and can provide useful information for decision makers’ information. For future research is suggested to address the point of view of health personnel regarding some variables analyzed in this study for comparison of the experiences of the major players in the program of cervical cancer screening. It should be mentioned that there are few studies on the quality of health care and user opinion, and much less those related to the service responsible for the early detection of cervical cancer.

Users of the program for early detection of cervical cancer were dissatisfied with it because attention was not what they expected. In most indicators addressed, a high percentage of dissatisfaction was obtained.

This project was supported by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT), code: PDCP2013-01-215888.

Gutiérrez Enríquez Sandra Olimpia,Gaytán Hernández Darío,Martínez Martínez Rosa Adriana,Gallegos García Verónica,Terán Figueroa Yolanda, (2016) Expectations and Perspectives of Users with the Screening Program for Cervical Cancer. Open Journal of Nursing,06,565-572. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2016.68060