<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2016.711147</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-69868</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effects of &lt;i&gt;Garcinia kola&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Azadirachta indica&lt;/i&gt; Seeds in the Inhibition of &lt;i&gt;Aspergillus flavus&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Aspergillus parasiticus&lt;/i&gt; Isolated from &lt;i&gt;Zea mays&lt;/i&gt; L. Awka, Nigeria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>N. Achugbu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>J.</surname><given-names>E. Amadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>C.</surname><given-names>V. Ilodibia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>N. Ikegbunam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>08</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1555</fpage><lpage>1563</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>16</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Crude extracts of neem and bitter kola seeds were evaluated for inhibition of the growth of aflatoxin-producing fungi (
  Aspergillus 
  flavus
   and 
  A. 
  parasiticus
  ) in 
  Zea 
  mays
   L. Different concentrations of the methanolic and ethanolic extracts of the test plants were tested individually and in combination against 
  A. 
  flavus
   and 
  A. 
  parasiticus
  . Inhibition of 
  A. 
  flavus
   using methanolic extracts of 
  G. kola
  , neem and combination of (
  G. kola
   and neem) seeds revealed that inhibition was highest in 
  G. kola
   (77.5) at 10% concentration, and lowest in neem (35.1) at 2.5% concentration. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference at 5%. Inhibition of 
  A. 
  flavus
   using ethanolic extracts of 
  G. kola
  , neem and combination of 
  G. kola
   and neem seeds revealed that inhibition was highest in the combination of (80.4) at 10% concentration and lowest in 
  G. kola
   (31.4) at 2.5% concentration. Using methanolic extracts of 
  G. kola
  , neem and combination against 
  A. 
  parasiticus
   showed that inhibition was highest in 
  G. kola
   and combination of seeds (54.8) at 10% concentration and lowest in neem seeds (30.5) at 5.0% concentration. The percentage inhibition of 
  A. 
  parasiticus
   using ethanolic extracts of 
  G. kola
  , neem and combination revealed that inhibition was highest in 
  G. kola 
  (79.5) at 10% concentration and lowest in the combination of G. kola and neem seeds (26.6) at 2.5% 
  concentration. These results will be important in planning a management strategy against 
  A. 
  flavus
   and 
  A. 
  parasiticus
   and other fungi associated with spoilage of stored products.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Garcinia kola</kwd><kwd> Azadirachta indica&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Inhibition</kwd><kwd> Aspergillus Species</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Zea mays&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Zea mays L. belongs to the grain-producing family―Poaceae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref1">1</xref>] . The name maize was derived from South American Indian Arawak-Carib word called-Mahiz. This seed is also called corn by the British and Americans which means “that which sustains life” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref2">2</xref>] . Maize is a widely adopted crop capable of production during the appropriate season in almost all parts of the world where farming is done. According to Fatima and Abdul [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref3">3</xref>] , the major cereals grown in the sub-savanna region of Nigeria include: maize (Zea mays L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). In Nigeria, maize was first introduced probably in the 16th century by the Portuguese. Global production of maize was estimated to be around 800 million tons in 2007, slightly more than rice which was 650 million tons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref4">4</xref>] . Mycotoxin contaminations of grains, especially those produced by species of Aspergillus render a significant portion of the agricultural produce in the world unfit for human consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref5">5</xref>] . Over 300 fungal metabolites have been reported toxic to man and animals and more than 25% of the world cereals are contaminated with known mycotoxin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>A major cause of plant diseases is fungi and is responsible for large scale harvest failures in crops like maize and other cereals all over the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref7">7</xref>] . Cultivation of maize is limited by diseases which cause grain loss of about 11% of the total production. The most widespread infection in stored grains is caused by fungi and they appear as mold or caking on the affected ears or grains. The corn loses colour, viability and reduction in food value. The poisonous mycotoxin is the most dreaded by-product of fungal attack. Mycotoxins cause poisoning in both livestock and human [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref8">8</xref>] . Uzma and Shahida [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref9">9</xref>] reported that more than sixty diseases affect maize. Several kinds of fungi can be associated with maize grains during storage either causing their deterioration or simply remaining viable to infect germinating seedlings. Aspergillus, Penicillium, Fusarium and some xerophytic species are fungi genera typically found in stored grains and several of them with capabilities of producing toxins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref10">10</xref>] . Some fungi especially species of Aspergillus, Diplodia, Penicillium, Fusarium, Trichoderma and a number of phycomycetes affect the seed of all forest species. The moisture content of the product enhances the development of these fungi. Also, temperature, storage time and degree of fungal contamination prior to storage, insect and mite activity facilitate fungi dissemination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref7">7</xref>] . Pacin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref11">11</xref>] identified Aspergillus and Fusarium species in stored grains and they were found mycotoxic at different concentrations.</p><p>A very important tool as a complementary technology to boost maize production is the control of maize diseases. Breeding resistant varieties of maize, chemical treatment and biological control are some approaches that have been used over the decades to control maize diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref12">12</xref>] . Synthetic fungicides have greatly contributed to management of losses due to aflatoxin-producing fungi in stored products. However, long term problems have resulted due to indiscriminate application of synthetic fungicides and ingestion of hexachlorobenzene (HCB) leading to toxic porphyria or poisoning in humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref13">13</xref>] . Synthetic fungicides such as captan, captafol and folpet are widely used to protect maize seeds but are responsible for symptoms such as skin irritation, dermal sensitization and several respiratory problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Neem is native of India, Pakistan, Thailand, Burma and it belongs to the family Meliaceae. The amazing tree has been a help to human race since 4500 years ago [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref15">15</xref>] . One of the immediately perceivable impact of this antifungal, antibacterial and perhaps even antiviral king of the arboretums on the human body is its guaranteed ability to heal or cure many, if not all, skin diseases or epidermal problems ranging from dandruff, acne, psoriasis, ringworm, athlete's foot, warts, chicken pox, small pox and malaria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Garcinia kolakola Heckel (Ciusiaceae), commonly known as bitter kola (English), orogbo (Yoruba) and akinu (Igbo) is a widespread tree of evergreen forest valued in Nigeria for its medicinal nuts which has led to its exploitation in the natural forests in recent times [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref17">17</xref>] . It is chewed extensively in Southern Nigeria as a masticatory to cause nervous alertness and has been proven to exhibit pharmacological uses in treating coughs, and throat infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref17">17</xref>] . G. kola exhibits purgative, antiparasitic, anti- inflammatory, anti-bacterial and anti-viral properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref18">18</xref>] . In addition, G. kola enjoys a folk reputation in the management of sickle cell disease (SCD), as poison antidote [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref20">20</xref>] and in the preservation of lipid food products prone to rancidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Synthetic fungicides cannot be safely applied to maize grains for reasons of pesticide toxicity, though they may be effective and efficient for the control of seed-borne fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref22">22</xref>] . Therefore, there is a need to research for an alternative, eco-friendly and cost effective approaches for storing grains/cereals without toxicity problems. Plant extracts of many higher plants have been reported to exhibit antibacterial, antifungal and insecticidal properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref13">13</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref28">28</xref>] . One of the best alternatives is the plant metabolites and plant-based pesticides as they are known to have minimal environmental impact and danger to consumers in contrast to the synthetic pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref29">29</xref>] . Therefore, the present study was focused on the antifungal effect of neem and G. kola.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sources of Plant Materials</title><p>1) Maize (Zea mays L.) seeds: Relatively healthy maize seeds (not freshly harvested) were obtained from Awka and stored in sterile paper bags.</p><p>2) Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss): Neem seeds were obtained from neem trees located within Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Main Campus Awka.</p><p>3) Bitter kola (Garcinia kola H.) seeds: Bitter kola seeds were procured from Eke-Awka market, Awka, Anambra State.</p><p>All plants were identified and authenticated by the curator attached to the Herbarium at the Department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Media Preparation and Isolation</title><p>Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) was used for the isolation of fungi associated with maize seeds and for the sub-culture, growth and maintenance of the fungal isolates. SDA was prepared according to the manufacturer’s prescription and autoclaved at 121˚C for 15 minutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref31">31</xref>] . All measurements were done using the weighing balance.</p><p>Direct isolation method was employed. Twenty relatively healthy maize seeds were surface-sterilized with 10% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution for 10 minutes and rinsed in three changes of sterile distilled water and left to dry on sterile filter papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref32">32</xref>] . Five maize seeds were inoculated per Petri dish and incubated at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C for 5 days. The Petri dishes were sealed with paraffin to prevent contamination.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Plant Extract</title><p>Fresh and healthy seeds of Azadirachta indica A. Juss were de-pulped and washed with sterile distilled water while Garcinia kola H. seeds were peeled and sliced with a sterile blade. These plant samples were air-dried at room temperature (25˚C) and turned into powder using a manual grinder. Solvents used for extraction were ethanol and methanol. Cold solvent extraction technique was employed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref33">33</xref>] . Five hundred grams (500 g) of each plant sample was dissolved in 1 litre of ethanol or methanol separately and left to stand for 48 hours at 25˚C. The mixture was filtered using Whatman No 1 filter paper and the filtrate was concentrated with a rotary evaporator at 75˚C (for ethanol) and 65˚C (for methanol). The crude extracts were collected in sterile sample bottles and stored at 4˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Antifungal Assay</title><p>Different concentrations of the test extracts were prepared by dissolving the extracts in the solvent; 25 mg/10ml, 50 mg/10ml, 75 mg/10ml and 100 mg/10ml. One millilitre (1 ml) of each plant extract solution was dispensed per Petri dish and 9 ml of molten SDA was added to each of the extracts to correspond to 2.5%, 5.0%, 7.5% and 10.0% extract concentration. Petri dishes were placed on a shaker for 10 minutes for even dispersion. Five millimetres (5 mm) disc of 5-day old pure culture of each test fungus was placed at the centre of the Petri dishes and incubated at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C. The negative control set up consists of un-amended agar plates while the positive control consists of the solvents mixed with the agar. The experimental design was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 3 replicates. All plates were sealed with paraffin and radial growth was measured for five days. Colony diameter was taken as the mean along two directions on two perpendicular lines drawn on the reverse side of the plates.</p><p>Percentage inhibition was calculated according to Whipps [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref34">34</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69868-formula650"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602680x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where R<sub>1 </sub>is the furthest radial distance of pathogen in control plates and R<sub>2</sub> is the furthest radial distance of pathogen in extract-incorporated agar plates.</p><p>The inhibition percentage was determined as a guide in selecting the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) that will be effective in controlling the fungi for their inhibitory effects using the scale of Sangoyomi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref35">35</xref>] .</p><p>≤0% no inhibition</p><p>&gt;0% - 20% slightly inhibition</p><p>&gt;20% - 50% moderate inhibition</p><p>&gt;50% - 100% inhibition (effective)</p><p>100% high inhibition</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed using ANOVA via SPSS. The means were separated using LSD at p ≤ 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Percentage Occurrence of Fungi from Maize Seeds</title><p>Fungal isolates associated with maize observed in this study include: Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. niger and Fusarium oxysporum. The most frequently occurring fungus was A. flavus (88.8%) while F. oxysporum was the lowest with 33.3%.</p><p>Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. niger and Fusarium oxysporum were isolated from the maize sample. Pure cultures of A. flavus formed yellow colonies on SDA and the morphological features revealed that A. flavus forms mycelia that are white with spreading yellow colonies. The microscopic characteristics of the fungus include long non-septate cells borne on the hyphae.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of Test Plant Extracts against Test Organisms</title><p>Result of methanolic extract of the test plant against A. flavus revealed that at 2.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. flavus was highest in G. kola (45.6) and lowest in neem seed (35.1). At 5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. flavus was highest in G. kola (68.4) and lowest in neem seeds (54.7). At 7.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. flavus was highest in G. kola (73.7) and lowest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (61.1). At 10.0% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. flavus was highest in G. kola (77.5) and lowest in neem seeds (64.9). There is a significant difference in the percentage inhibition of A. flavus between methanol extract of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds at 10% concentration (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Ethanolic extract of the test plant against A. flavus indicated that at 2.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. flavus was highest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (58.9) and lowest in G. kola (31.4). At 5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. flavus was highest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (69.6) and lowest in G. kola (38.2). At 7.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of Aspergillus flavus was highest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (73.4) and lowest in G. kola (45.6). At 10.0% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. flavus was highest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (80.4) and lowest in G. kola (53.6). Here, there is a significant difference in the percentage inhibition of A. flavus between ethanol extract of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds at 2.5%, 5.0% and 10% concentration (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Methanolic extract of test plants against A. parasiticus indicated that at 2.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in G. kola (43.8) and lowest in mixture of G. kola and neem seeds (38.1). At 5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in G. kola (46.2) and lowest in neem seeds (30.5). At 7.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in the combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (55.2) and lowest in neem seeds (38.0). At 10.0% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in combination of (G. kola and neem) and neem seeds (54.8) and lowest in G. kola (54.3). There is a significant difference in the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus between methanol extract of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds at 7.5% and 10% concentration (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Result of ethanolic extract of the test plant showed that at 2.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in G. kola (54.6) and lowest in the combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (26.6). At 5%</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage inhibition of Aspergillus flavus using methanol extract of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602680x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage inhibition of Aspergillus flavus using ethanol extract of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602680x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage inhibition of Aspergillus parasiticus using methanol extract of G. kola, neem, and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602680x10.png"/></fig><p>concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in G. kola (65.5) and lowest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (44.2). At 7.5% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in G. kola (76.7) and lowest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (39.3). At 10.0% concentration, the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus was highest in G. kola (79.5) and lowest in combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (48.1). There is a significant difference in the percentage inhibition of A. parasiticus between ethanol extract of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Four fungal isolates were identified in this study, of which three were Aspergillus species with A. flavus having the highest frequency of 88.88%. According to Yan-ni et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref36">36</xref>] , Aspergillus species are found to be associated to disease in maize. The result of high frequency of A. flavus in maize agrees with the report by Bankole et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref37">37</xref>] and Wagacha and Muthomi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref38">38</xref>] . Methanolic and ethanolic extracts of A. indica and G. kola seeds at four concentrations (2.5%, 5.0%, 7.5% and 10.0%) were observed in this study to inhibit the growth of A. flavus and A. parasiticus. Kaur and Kaur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref39">39</xref>] had reported that natural products of higher plants give a new source of antimicrobial agents with possible novel mechanism of action. This is supported by Kiran et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref40">40</xref>] , who screened seven medicinal plants for anti-fungal activity against seed-borne fungi of maize seeds.</p><p>In this study, the ability of the test plants extracts (individually and in combination) to inhibit the growth of A. flavus and A. parasiticus varied. Results showed that the test plants extracts were effective for reducing mycelial growth of test organism. Methanolic extract of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) against A. flavus showed antifungal activity in the inhibition which was highest in G. kola at 10% concentration. With ethanolic extracts of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) against A. flavus, the inhibitory activity was highest in the combination of G. kola and neem at 10% concentration. Methanolic extracts G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) against A. parasiticus showed that inhibition was highest in the combination of G. kola and neem at 7.5% concentration. In the ethanolic extracts of G. kola, neem and combination of (G. kola and neem) against A. parasiticus, inhibition was highest in G. kola at 10% concentration.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage inhibition of Aspergillus parasiticus using ethanol extract of G. kola, neem, and combination of (G. kola and neem) seeds</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602680x11.png"/></fig><p>In all, it can be seen from the study that G. kola and neem seeds produced good result (with slight variations) in inhibiting the growth of A. flavus and A. parasiticus and the solvents (methanol and ethanol) used were effective in extracting the active ingredients from the test plants. The extracts from these plants showed the ability to suppress growth of A. flavus and A. parasiticus. It is possible that these bioactive compounds may be responsible for the antifungal activity and hence the efficacy against A. flavus and A. parasiticus. This result confirms the report given by Joseph et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref41">41</xref>] , that extract from Garcinia have rich source of phenolic acids that inhibited aflatoxin producing fungi and that neem seed powder is a very good biological fungicide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69868-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Synthetic fungicides have been used for the preservation of stored grains, but due to long effects on human health, natural plant extracts may provide a better alternative in other to produce safe food. Much attention has been given to the use of medicinal plant to control plant diseases. This has led to the use of plant as excellent bio-fungicide. The two plant extracts used in this study contained effective phytochemical compounds that could be used as inhibitors of fungal growth in maize grains and also in other plant grains or cereals. The bioactive substance in these plants indicates that these plants are potential for managing A. flavus and A. parasiticus production in maize grains. In adapting the methods used in this study to control A. flavus and A. parasiticus, consideration should be given to the use of different concentrations of the crude plant extracts, and the test plant extracts as this had variations in inhibiting the growth of the organisms. This study also recommends evaluation of other medicinal plants as a bio-fungicide against A. flavus and A. parasiticus.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>A. N. Achugbu,J. E. Amadi,C. V. Ilodibia,M. N. Ikegbunam, (2016) Effects of Garcinia kola and Azadirachta indica Seeds in the Inhibition of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus Isolated from Zea mays L. Awka, Nigeria. American Journal of Plant Sciences,07,1555-1563. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2016.711147</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.69868-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onuegbu, B.A. and Oji-Isoma, J. (2000) Effect of Commercial Bleach on Seedling Damping-Off of Pepper Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Scientia Africa, 1, 44-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akinleye, B.O. and Adigun, A.B. (2006) Soil Texture and the Phenotypic Expression of Maize (Zea mays L.). Research Journal of Botany, 3,136-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fatima, B.J. and Abdul, S.D. (2005) Fungi Associated with Maize. Nigerian Journal of Botany, 18, 81-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chukunda, F.A., Osakwe, J.A. and Baraka, R.E. (2013) Control of Seed-Borne Fungi of Stored Maize from Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute Port Harcourt. Research Web Pub, 1, 18-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devi, K.T., Mayo, M.A., Reddy, G., Emmanuel, K.E., Larondelle, Y. and Reddy, D.V.R. (2001) Occurrence of Ochratoxin A in Black Pepper, Coriander, Ginger and Turmeric in India. Food Additives Contamination, 18, 830-835.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030117589</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galvano, F., Piva, A., Ritieni, A. and Galvano, G. (2001) Dietary Strategies to Counteract the Effect of Mycotoxins: A Review. Journal of Food Protection, 64, 120-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suleiman, M.N. and Omafe, O.M. (2013) Activity of Three Medicinal Plants on Fungi Isolated from Stored Maize Seeds (Zea mays L.). Global Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, 1, 77-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otsuki, T., Wilson, J.S. and Sewadeh, M. (2001) What Price Precaution? European Harmonization of Aflatoxin Regulations and African Groundnut Exports. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 28, 263-283.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.3.263</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uzma, S. and Shahida, A. (2007) The Screening of Seven Medicinal Plants for Artificial Activity against Seed Borne Fungi of Maize Seeds. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39, 285-292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amadi, J.E. and Adeniyi, D.O. (2009) Mycotoxin Production by Fungi Isolated from Stored Grains. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8, 1219-1221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pacin, A.M., Boviev, E.C., Gonzazez, H.L., White Church, E.M., Martinez, E.J. and Resnik, S. (2009) Fungal and Fumonisins Contamination in Argentina Maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 57, 2778-2781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf803609c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tagne, A., Fenjio, T.P. and Sonna, C. (2008) Essential Oil and Plant Extract as Potential Substitute to Synthetic Fungicides in Control of Fungi. Endure International Conference, New Delhi, 23 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, D.M., Kumar, S.D., Kubendran, D. and Kalaichelvan, P. (2013) Hexachlorobenzene—Sources, Remediation and Future Prospects. IJCRR, 5, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ankita, S. and Kanika, S. (2012) Protection of Maize by Storage Fungi and Aflatoxin Production Using Botanicals. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources, 3, 215-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boni, E.E. (2005) Clinical Diagnosis of Common Scalp Disorders. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Symposium Proceedings, 10, 190-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1087-0024.2005.10103.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anand, N., Johnson, M.A. and Arulsamy, A. (2010) Antifungal Properties of Neem (Azadirachtaindica) Leaves Extract to treat Hair Dandruff. E-International Scientific Research Journal, 2, 244-252.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farombi, E.O., Adepoju, B.F., Ola-Davies, O.E. and Emerole, G.O. (2005) Chemoprevention of Aflatoxin B1-Induced Genotoxicity and Hepatic Oxidative Damage in Rats by Kolaviron, a Natural Bioflavonoid of Garcinia kola Seeds. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14, 207-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200506000-00003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogunmoyole, T., Olalekan, O.O., Fatai, O., Makun, J.O. and Made, I.J. (2012) Antioxidant and Phytochemical Profile of Aqueous and Ethanolic Extract of Garcinia kola. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, 4, 66-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kabangu, L., Galeffi, C., Aonzo, E., Nicoletti, M. and Messana, I. (1987) New Biflavone from the Bark of G. kola. Planta Medica, 11, 257-277.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Egunyomi, A., Moody, J.O. and Eletu, O.M. (2009) Antisickling Activities of Two Ethnomedicinal Plants Recipes Used for the Management of Sickle Cell Anaemia in Ibadan Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8, 20-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harris, C.A., Renfrew, M.J. and Woolridge, M.W. (2001) Assessing the Risk of Pesticide Residues to Consumers Recent and Future Developments. Food Additives and Contamination, 18, 1124-1129.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030110050122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dukic, N.M., Bozin, B., Sokovic, M. and Simin, N. (2004) Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Melissa officinalis L. (Lamiaceae) Essential Oil. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 52, 2485-2489.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf030698a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouamama, H., Noel, T., Villard, J., Benharref, A. and Jana, M. (2006) Antimicrobial Activities of the Leaf Extracts of Two Moroccan Cistus L. Species. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 104, 104-107.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ergene, A., Guler, P., Tan, S., Mirici, S., Hamzaoglu, E. and Duran, A. (2006) Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of Heracleum sphondylium Sub sp. Artvinense. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 1087-1089.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kiran, B. and Raveesha, K.A. (2006) Antifungal Activity of Seed Extract of Psoralea corylifolia L. Plant Disease Research, 20, 213-215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohana, D.C. and Raveesha, K.A. (2006) Anti-Bacterial Activity of Caesalpina coriaria (Jacq.) Willd. against Plant Pathogenic Xanthomonas Pathovars: An Eco-Friendly Approach. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 2, 317-327.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shariff, N., Sudarshana, M.S., Umesha, S. and Hariprasad, P. (2006) Antimicrobial Activity of Rauvolfia tetraphylla and Physalis minima Leaf and Callus Extracts. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 946-950.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olusanmi, M.J. and Amadi, J.E. (2009) Studies on the Antimicrobial Properties and Phytochemical Screening of Garlic (Allium sativum) Extracts. Ethnobotanical Leaflets, 13, 1186-1196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kakad, S.L., Dhembare, A.J. and Chakane, R. (2015) Evaluation of Antifungal Activities of Some Selected Plant Species against Fungal Pathogen. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Research, 5, 24-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheesebrough, M. (2000) Medical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries: Microbiology. Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford, 260 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jawetz, M.A., Brooks, G.F., Butel, J.S. and Morse, S.A. (2004) Medical Microbiology. 23rd Edition, McGraw Hill Companies Inc., Singapore, 818 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ritichie, B. (1991) Practical Techniques in Plant Pathology. CAB, Wallingford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harbone, J.B. (1973) Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York, 131 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Whipps, J.M. (1987) Effects of Media or Growth and Interactions between a Range of Soil-Borne Glass Pathogens and Antagonistic Fungi. New Pathologist, 107, 127-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04887.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sangoyomi, T.E. (2004) Post-Harvest Fungal Deterioration of Yam (Dioscorea rotundata. Poir) and Its Control. PhD Thesis, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 179 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yin, Y.N., Yan, L.Y., Jiang, J.H. and Ma, Z.H. (2008) Biological Control of Aflatoxin Contamination of Crops. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 9, 787-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0860003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bankole, S.A., Schollenberger, M. and Drochner, W. (2006) Mycotoxin Contamination in Food Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review. Mycotoxin Research, 22, 163-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02959270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wagacha, J.M. and Muthomi, J.W. (2008) Mycotoxin Problem in Africa: Current Status, Implications to Food Safety, Health and Possible Management Strategies. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 124, 1-12.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.01.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaur, R. and Kaur, H. (2010) The Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil and Plant Extracts of Wood Florida fruticosa. Archieves of Applied Science Research, 2, 302-309.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kiran, B., Lalith, V. and Raveesha, K.A. (2010) Screening of Some Medicinal Plants for Antifungal Activity against Seed Borne Fungi of Maize Seeds. African Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 2, 99-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69868-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joseph, G.S., Jayaprakasha, G.K., Selvi, A.T., Jena, B.S. and Sakariah, K.K. (2005) Anti-Aflatoxigenic and Anti-Oxidant Activities of Garcinia Extracts. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 101, 153-160.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.11.001</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>